Search

Aims. The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the event rate of patients with ischemic stroke has been poorly investigated. We sought to evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 infection on mortality in patients with ischemic stroke admitted during the 2020 pandemic in Italy. Methods. We analyzed a nationwide, comprehensive, and universal administrative database of patients who were admitted for ischemic stroke during and after the national lockdown for the COVID-19 infection in 2020, and the equivalent periods over the previous 5 years in Italy. The 2020 observed hospitalization and mortality rates of stroke patients with and without COVID-19 infection were compared with the expected rates, in accordance with the trend of the previous 5 years. Results. During the period of observation, 300,890 hospitalizations for ischemic stroke occurred in Italy. In 2020, 41,302 stroke patients (1102 with concomitant COVID-19 infection) were admitted at 771 centers. The rate of admissions for ischemic stroke during the 2020 pandemic was markedly reduced compared with previous years (percentage change vs. 2015: −23.5). Based on the 5 year trend, the 2020 expected 30 day and 1 year mortality rates were 9.8% and 23.9%, respectively, and the observed incidence of death rates were 12.2% and 26.7%, respectively (both p < 0.001). After multiple corrections, higher rates of mortality were observed among patients admitted for stroke with a concomitant COVID-19 diagnosis. Conclusions. During the COVID-19 pandemic in 2020 in Italy, the rate of hospitalizations for ischemic stroke was dramatically reduced, although both the 30 day and 1 year mortality rates increased compared with the previous 5 year trend.

Background: Head-to-head comparisons of devices for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) are mostly limited to 2-arm studies so far. The aim of this study was to compare simultaneously outcomes of the most used, second- and third-generation transcatheter aortic valves in a real-world population. Methods: A total of 2728 patients undergoing TAVI with different second- and third-generation devices, and enrolled in the multicenter, prospective OBSERVANT II study (Observational Study of Effectiveness of TAVI With New Generation Devices for Severe Aortic Stenosis Treatment) from December 2016 to September 2018 were compared according to the transcatheter aortic valve received. Outcomes were adjudicated through a linkage with administrative databases, and adjusted using inverse propensity of treatment weighting. The primary end point was the composite of all-cause death, stroke and rehospitalization for heart failure at 1-year. Rates were reported consecutively for Evolut R, Evolut PRO, SAPIEN 3, ACURATE neo, and Portico groups. Results: The primary end point did not differ among groups (23.9% versus 24.7% versus 21.5% versus 23.7% versus 27.4%, respectively, P =0.56). Permanent pacemaker implantation was significantly lower for patients receiving SAPIEN 3 (19.9% versus 19.3% versus 12.5% versus 14.7% versus 22.1%, respectively, P P P Conclusions: Data from real-world practice showed low and comparable rates of complications after TAVI considering all the available devices. Patients receiving SAPIEN 3 valve had lower rates of paravalvular regurgitation and permanent pacemaker implantation, but higher transprosthetic gradients.

We sought to assess the clinical impact of Covid-19 infection on mortality in patients with Non-ST elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) admitted during the national outbreak in Italy.We analysed a nationwide, comprehensive, and universal administrative database of consecutive NSTEMI patients admitted during lockdown for Covid-19 infection (March,11st - May 3rd, 2020) and the equivalent periods of the previous 5 years in Italy. The observed rate of 30-day and 6-month all-cause mortality of NSTEMI patients with and without Covid-19 infection during the lockdown was compared with the expected rate of death according to the trend of the previous 5 years.During the period of observation, 48.447 NSTEMI hospitalizations occurred in Italy. Among these, 4981 NSTEMI patients were admitted during the 2020 outbreak: 173 (3.5%) with and 4808 (96.5%) without a Covid-19 diagnosis. According to the 5-year trend, the 2020 expected rate of 30-day and 6-month all-cause mortality was 6.5% and 12.2%, while the observed incidence of death was 8.3% (p = 0.001) and 13.6% (p = 0.041), respectively. Excluding NSTEMI patients with a Covid-19 diagnosis, the 6-month mortality rate resulted in accordance with the prior 5-year trend. After multiple corrections, the presence of Covid-19 diagnosis resulted one of the independent predictors of all-cause mortality at 30 days [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 4.3; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 2.90-6.23; p 0.0001] and 6 months (adjusted OR 3.5; 95% CI: 2.43-5.03; p 0.0001).During the 2020 national outbreak in Italy, a concomitant diagnosis of Covid-19 in NSTEMI was associated with a significantly higher rate of mortality.

The long-term clinical benefits of myocardial revascularization in a contemporary, nationwide cohort of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) survivors are unclear. We aimed to compare the mortality rates and clinical outcomes at 8 years of patients admitted in Italy for a first AMI managed with or without myocardial revascularization during the index event. This is a national retrospective cohort study that enrolled patients admitted for a first AMI in 2012 in all Italian hospitals who survived at 30 days. The outcomes of interest were all-cause mortality, major cardio-cerebrovascular events (MACCE), and re-hospitalization for heart failure (HF) at 8 years. Time to events was analysed using a Cox and Fine and Gray multivariate regression model. A total of 127 431 patients with AMI were admitted to Italian hospitals in 2012. The study cohort consisted of 62 336 AMI events, of whom 63.8% underwent percutaneous or surgical revascularization ≤30 days of the index hospital admission. At 8 years, the cumulative incidence of all-cause death was 36.5% (24.6% in revascularized and 57.6% in not revascularized patients). After multiple corrections, the hazard ratio (HR) for all-cause mortality in revascularized vs. not revascularized patients was 0.61 (P

The debate on the advantages and limitations of off-pump myocardial revascularization (OPCAB) on long-term outcomes has not still arrived to a conclusion. This study was designed to compare the impact of OPCAB vs, on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) on long-term mortality and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs).The PRIORITY project was designed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of two large prospective multicenter cohort studies on CABG. Data on isolated CABG were linked to two administrative datasets. The inverse probability of treatment weight was employed to balance the treatment groups. Time-to-event methods were employed to analyze endpoints.The cohort consisted of 10 988 patients who underwent isolated CABG (27.2% OPCAB). The median follow-up time was 7.9 years and was 100% complete. Unadjusted long-term survival was significantly worst for OPCAB, confirmed by weighted models (hazard ratio 1.08, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.01-1.14, P = 0.01). OPCAB was associated to an increased risk of MACCE at 10 years (weighted hazard ratio 1.18, 95% CI 1.12-1.23, P 0.001). Inside the MACCEs, OPCAB was significantly related to increased incidence of repeat revascularization (hazard ratio 2.27, 95% CI 1.39-3.85, P 0.001, in the first 6 months, hazard ratio 1.19, 95% CI 1.09-1.32, P 0.001 afterward) and stroke (hazard ratio 1.22, 95% CI 1.10-1.35, P 0.001).The results of this study suggest that OPCAB was associated with an increased risk of mortality, repeat myocardial revascularization and stroke at 10 years compared with on-pump CABG.

OBJECTIVES Our goal was to evaluate the impact of gender on the 10-year outcome of patients after isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) included in the Italian nationwide PRedictIng long-term Outcomes afteR Isolated coronary arTery bypass surgery (PRIORITY) study. METHODS The PRIORITY project was designed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of patients who underwent CABG and were included in 2 prospective multicentre cohort studies. The primary end point of this analysis was major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events. Baseline differences between the study groups were balanced with propensity score matching and inverse probability of treatment. Time to events was analysed using Cox regression and competing risk analysis. RESULTS The study population comprised 10 989 patients who underwent isolated CABG (women 19.6%). Propensity score matching produced 1898 well-balanced pairs. The hazard of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event was higher in women compared to men [adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 1.13, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.03–1.23; P = 0.009]. The incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event in women was significantly higher at 1 year (HR 1.31, 95% CI 1.11–1.55; P CONCLUSIONS The present study documented an excess of non-fatal cardiac events after CABG among women despite comparable 10-year survival with men. These findings suggest that studies investigating measures of tertiary prevention are needed to decrease the risk of adverse cardiovascular events among women.

OBJECTIVES To compare clinical outcomes of balloon-expandable (BE) and self-expanding (SE) transcatheter aortic valves (TAVs) up to 5 years. BACKGROUND To date, no robust, comparative data of BE and SE TAVs at long-term are available. METHODS We considered a total of 1,440 patients enrolled in the multicenter OBSERVANT study and undergoing transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TF-TAVI) with either supra-annular SE (n = 830, 57.6%) and intra-annular BE (n = 610, 42.4%) valves. Clinical outcomes of the two groups were compared after adjustment using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and confirmed by sensitivity analysis with propensity score matching. RESULTS Patients receiving SE valve showed a higher all-cause mortality at 5 years (Kaplan-Meier estimates 52.3% vs. 47.7%; Hazard ratio [HR] 1.18, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.38, p = .04). Landmark analyses showed that there was a not statistically significant reversal of risk excess against the BE group starting from 3 years after TAVI (3-5 years HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.76-1.25, p = .86). Post-procedural, moderate/severe paravalvular regurgitation (PVR)(HR 1.46, 95% CI 1.14-1.87; p

OBJECTIVES We sought to develop and validate a novel risk assessment tool for the prediction of 30-day mortality after surgical aortic valve replacement incorporating a patient’s frailty. METHODS Overall, 4718 patients from the multicentre study OBSERVANT was divided into derivation (n = 3539) and validation (n = 1179) cohorts. A stepwise logistic regression procedure and a criterion based on Akaike information criteria index were used to select variables associated with 30-day mortality. The performance of the regression model was compared with that of European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) II. RESULTS At 30 days, 90 (2.54%) and 35 (2.97%) patients died in the development and validation data sets, respectively. Age, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, concomitant coronary revascularization, frailty stratified according to the Geriatric Status Scale, urgent procedure and estimated glomerular filtration rate were independent predictors of 30-day mortality. The estimated OBS AVR score showed higher discrimination (area under curve 0.76 vs 0.70, P CONCLUSIONS The OBS AVR risk score showed high discrimination and calibration abilities in predicting 30-day mortality after surgical aortic valve replacement. The addition of a simplified frailty assessment into the model seems to contribute to an improved predictive ability over the EuroSCORE II. The OBS AVR risk score showed a significant association with long-term mortality.

Despite the prognostic role of frailty among elderly patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) is known, its assessment still represents a challenge due to the multitude of scales proposed in literature. The aim of this study was to define the prognostic impact of a simple combined frailty model including both functional and metabolic parameters in a large cohort of patients undergoing TAVI with new generation devices.We examined 1-year survival of patients affected by aortic valve stenosis treated with new generation TAVI devices from the OBSERVANT II study. Frailty of patients undergoing TAVI was stratified in four groups according to a combination of functional (geriatric status scale - GSS) and metabolic (global nutritional risk index - GNRI) assessment. Among 1985 patients included in the analysis, 1008 (51%) had no significant frailty, 246 (12%) had only functional impairment, 522 (26%) had only metabolic impairment and 209 (11%) had both functional and metabolic impairment. The presence of combined functional and metabolic frailty was associated with a two-fold increased risk of 1-year all-cause mortality (HR 2.06 [95% CI 1.35-3.14]; p = 0.001). GNRI as a single parameter had a lower impact on mortality (HR 1.48 [95% CI 1.05 - 2.09]; p = 0.027), whereas GSS did not impact on mortality (HR 1.23 [95% CI 0.77-1.97]; p = 0.386).In a large real-world cohort of patients undergoing TAVI with new generation devices, combined functional and metabolic frailty had a significant and incremental impact on 1-year mortality.

Background. We sought to assess the clinical impact of COVID-19 infection on mortality in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) admitted during the national outbreak in Italy. Methods. We analysed a nationwide, comprehensive, and universal administrative database of consecutive STEMI patients admitted during lockdown for COVID-19 infection (11 March–3 May 2020) and the equivalent periods of the previous 5 years in Italy. The observed rate of 30-day and 6-month all-cause mortality of STEMI patients with and without COVID-19 infection during the lockdown was compared with the expected rate of death, according to the trend of the previous 5 years. Results. During the study period, 32.910 STEMI hospitalizations occurred in Italy. Among these, 4048 STEMI patients were admitted during the 2020 outbreak: 170 (4.2%) with and 3878 (95.8%) without a COVID-19 diagnosis. According to the 5-year trend, the 2020 expected rates of 30-day and 6-month all-cause mortality were 9.2% and 12.6%, while the observed incidences of death were 10.8% (p = 0.016) and 14.4% (p = 0.017), respectively. Excluding STEMI patients with a COVID-19 diagnosis, the mortality rate resulted in accordance with the prior 5-year trend. After multiple corrections, the presence of COVID-19 diagnosis was an independent predictor of all-cause mortality at 30 days [adjusted odds ratio (OR) 4.5; 95% confidence intervals (CI) 3.09–6.45; p < 0.0001] and 6 months (adjusted OR 3.6; 95% CI: 2.47–5.12; p < 0.0001). Conclusions.During the 2020 national outbreak in Italy, COVID-19 infection significantly increased the mortality trend in patients with STEMI.

In Italy the National Outcomes Evaluation Programme, (P.N.E.) is the most comprehensive comparative evaluation of healthcare outcomes at the national level. The aim of this report is to describe the P.N.E. and some of the most relevant results achieved. The P.N.E. analysed 184 indicators on quality of care in 2015–2020 period. The data sources are the Italian Health Information Systems. The indicators reported were: proportion of surgery within 2 days after hip fracture in the elderly (HF), 30-day mortality after hospital admission for acute myocardial infarction (AMI), proportion of reoperations within 90 days of breast-conserving surgery and proportion of primary caesarean deliveries. Risk adjustment methods were used to take into account patients’ characteristics. From 2010 to 2020 the proportion of interventions within 2 days after HF increased from 31.3% to 64.6%, the AMI 30-day mortality decreased from 10.4% to 8.3%, the proportion of reinterventions within 90 days of breast-conserving surgery decreased from 12.0% to 5.9% and the proportion of primary caesarean deliveries decreased from 28.4% to 22.7%. Results by area of residence showed heterogeneity of healthcare quality. We observed a general improvement in different clinical areas not always associated with a reduction of heterogeneity among areas of residence.

The outcome of patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) may vary substantially based on baseline risk. We aimed at analyzing the impact of gender, age and heart failure (HF) on mortality trends, based on a nationwide, comprehensive and universal administrative database of AMI.This is a nationwide cohort study of patients admitted with AMI from 2009 to 2018 in all Italian hospitals. In-hospital mortality rate (I-MR) and 1-year post-discharge mortality rate (1-Y-MR) were assessed.Among the 1,000,965 AMI events included in the analysis, 43.6% occurred in patients aged ≥75 years, 34.7% in females and 21.8% in AMI complicated by HF at the index hospitalization. Both I-MR and 1-Y-MR significantly decreased over time (from 8.87% to 6.72%; mean annual change -0.23%; confidence intervals (CI): - 0.26% to -0.20% and from 12.24% to 10.59%; mean annual change -0.18%; CI: - 0.24% to -0.13%, respectively). This trend was confirmed in younger and elderly AMI patients, in both sexes. In AMI patients complicated by HF, both I-MR and 1-Y-MR were markedly high, regardless of age and gender.This contemporary, nationwide study suggests that I-MR and 1-Y-MR are still elevated, albeit decreasing over time. Elderly patients and those with HF at the time of index admission, present a particularly high risk of fatal events, regardless of gender.

The allocation of clinical and economic resources is an emerging issue in health management. A useful update necessarily depends on the evaluation of long-term outcomes of clinical and surgical resources that can permit emphasis on all amendable fields, improve quality of care, and reduce health costs. The PRIORITY (PRedictIng long term Outcomes afteR Isolated coronary arTery bypass surgerY) study represents the first innovative step toward the updating of health management in a selected field, surgery for coronary artery disease, which is one of the most prevalent diseases and requires allocation of high-cost resources, although information on long-term outcomes is limited. The aims of the PRIORITY study are the identification of preoperative risk factors for long-term outcomes and the development of clinical and administrative preoperative scores that can guide clinicians and the national health system to more appropriate actions for increasing quality of care and reducing costs.

Introduction: Few data on long-term follow-up of effectiveness and advantages related to the employ of double internal thoracic artery grafts (BITA) for coronary artery bypass grafting are available and the advantage of the employ of BITA have been recently questioned. Hypothesis: This observational cohort study was designed by the PRIORITY planning committee to evaluate 10-year follow-up of isolated CABG performed with and without BITA in order to evaluate the impact of BITA on long-term outcomes. Methods: The PRIORITY project was designed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of 2 large prospective multicenter cohort studies on CABG conducted between 2002-2004 and 2007-2008. Data on isolated CABG were linked to 2 administrative datasets. The primary endpoints were death and major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) at follow-up. Time-to-event data were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox regression. Models generation was performed on the full dataset and the validation was performed with Montecarlo simulations. Results: The population consisted of 11021 patients who underwent isolated CABG; double thoracic internal artery grafts was employed in 23.5%. The median follow-up time was 7.9 years (interquartile range 7.4 - 10 years). After adjustment for potential confounding factors, BITA was significantly associated with better survival (HR 0.81, 95%CI 0.73-0.89, p < 0.001). Moreover, the employment of BITA reduced the incidence of MACEs at follow-up (adjusted HR 0.83, 95%CI 0.77-0.89, p < 0.001). In details, BITA was demonstrated to be a protective factor for acute myocardial infarction (adjusted HR 0.83, 95%CI 0.72-0.96, p = 0.001) and for rehospitalization for percutaneous cardiac intervention (PCI; adjusted HR 0.72, 95%CI 0.63-0.84, p < 0.001). Conclusions: The employment of double internal thoracic artery grafts for coronary artery bypass grafting has been associated to significant survival advantage at long-term. Moreover, it is a protective factor for acute myocardial infarction and rehospitalization for percutaneous cardiac intervention, reducing the hazard by 28%.

Background The debate on the advantages and limitations of off-pump (OPCAB) on long-term outcomes has not still arrived to a conclusion. This study was designed to compare the impact of OPCAB vs on-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) on long-term mortality and major adverse cardiac events (MACEs). Methods The PRIORITY project was designed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of 2 large prospective multicenter cohort studies on CABG conducted between 2002–2004 and 2007–2008. Data on isolated CABG were linked to 2 administrative datasets. Time-to-event methods were employed to analyze outcomes. Results The population consisted of 11021 patients who underwent isolated CABG (27.2% OPCAB) that were divided into development and validation datasets. The median follow-up time was 8 years (interquartile range 7.6–10 years) and was 100% complete. Unadjusted long-term survival was significantly worst for OPCAB, nonetheless the adjustment did not confirm OPCAB as a risk factor for mortality (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.85–1.03, p=0.19). OPCAB was associated to an increased risk of MACE at 10 years (adjusted HR 1.14, 95% CI 1.06–1.23, p=0.001). Inside the MACEs, OPCAB was significantly related to increased incidence of rehospitalization for percutaneous cardiac intervention (PCI), (adjusted HR 1.33, 95% CI 1.16–1.53, p Conclusions OPCAB did not affect long-term mortality but is associated with an increased long-term risk of repeat PCI. These findings may have important implications towards health resources allocation, particularly in a climate of cost containment of healthcare expenditures. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): Italian Minister of Health

Background The advantages of the employment of double internal thoracic artery grafts (BITA) for coronary artery bypass grafting have been recently questioned and no data on long-term follow-up are available. This observational retrospective cohort study was designed by the PRIORITY planning committee to evaluate 10-year follow-up of isolated CABG performed with and without BITA in order to clarify and consolidate the contrasting literature. Methods The PRIORITY project was designed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of 2 large prospective multicenter cohort studies on CABG conducted between 2002–2004 and 2007–2008. Data on isolated CABG were linked to 2 administrative datasets. Time-to-event distributions were separately analyzed accordingly to primary event-type (death, MACEs), using Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox regression. Results The population consisted of 11021 patients who underwent isolated CABG that were divided into development and validation datasets; double thoracic internal artery grafts was employed in 24.6%. The median follow-up time was 8 years (interquartile range 7.6–10 years) and was 100% complete. After adjustment for potential confounding factors, BITA was significantly associated with better survival (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.76–0.95, p=0.003). Moreover, the employment of BITA reduced the incidence of MACEs at follow-up (adjusted HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.80–0.94, p=0.001). In details, BITA was demonstrated to be a protective factor for acute myocardial infarction (adjusted HR 0.84, 95% CI 0.71–0.99, p=0.05) and for rehospitalization for percutaneous cardiac intervention (PCI; adjusted HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.70–0.96, p=0.013). Conclusions The employment of double internal thoracic artery grafts for coronary artery bypass grafting has been associated to survival advantage at 10-year. Moreover, it significantly decreased the incidence of acute myocardial infarction and rehospitalization for percutaneous cardiac intervention. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Public grant(s) – National budget only. Main funding source(s): Italian Minister of Health

Background The debate on the benefits and limitations of off-pump (OPCAB) coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) on long-term outcomes is not yet settled. This study aimed to compare the impact of OPCAB vs on-pump CABG on long-term outcomes and to evaluate possible public health implications linked to their use. Methods The PRIORITY project was planned to evaluate the long-term outcomes of two prospective multicenter studies on CABG conducted between 2002-2004 and 2007-2008. Data on isolated CABG were linked to administrative data in order to retrieve patients' late outcome. Time-to-event distributions were analyzed accordingly to primary event-type (death, major adverse cardiac events (MACEs)) using the Kaplan-Meier and the Cox proportional hazards methods. Results The study population consisted of 11 021 patients who underwent isolated CABG (27.2% OPCAB). The median follow-up time was 8.0 years (interquartile range 7.6-10.0 years). OPCAB had comparable late all-cause mortality to on-pump CABG (HR 0.94, 95%CI 0.85-1.03, p = 0.19), but it was associated to an increased risk of MACE (adjusted HR 1.14, 95%CI 1.06-1.23, p = 0.001). In particular, OPCAB had an increased risk of repeated revascularization with percutaneous cardiac intervention (PCI) (adjusted HR 1.33, 95%CI 1.16-1.53, p Conclusions OPCAB does not affect long-term mortality, but it significantly increases the risk of MACEs. In particular, OPCAB had an increased risk of repeated revascularization with PCI. These findings may have important implications towards health resources allocation. Key messages Off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting strategy is associated with an increased long-term risk of MACE and repeated PCI. Off-pump strategy is mainly based on operator preferences and can have important implications in terms of healthcare costs.

Background Although the improvement of therapeutic strategies is leading to a dramatic decline of in-hospital acute coronary syndrome (ACS) death rates, differences in care and prognosis of ACS patients exist when age, gender and admission department are considered. Methods The national administrative hospital discharge record (HDR) system was used. Only data recorded from January 1, 2017 to Dicember 31, 2018 were analyzed. This approach allowed to identify 205775 patients reporting ACS as primary or secondary diagnosis: 122812 with non-ST-elevation ACS (NSTE-ACS) and 82963 with ST-elevation ACS (STEMI). The ACS cohort was stratified by age ( Results Among the 205775 patients hospitalized for ACS, 6% of STEMI and 8.3% of NSTE-ACS patients have been treated only in a general medicine ward and have never passed through a specific cardiology ward. For STEMI patients, the proportion becomes 4% when males are considered, increases up to 10% for females and up to 13% for elderly patients (≥75 years). During the index hospitalization, about 25% of female and more than 30% of elderly patients with STEMI do not undergo a coronary procedure or other extensive investigations; the same happens only in about 10% of male and 6% of younger patients. The proportion of improperly managed patients reaches 35% for women aged ≥75 years. Conclusions In-hospital management of women and elderly patients with ST-elevation ACS does not completely comply with the recommended guidelines and exposes them to unfavourable prognosis. Key messages Women and elderly STEMI patients are markedly less intensively investigated and treated in cardiologic departments. This medical policy could lead to unfavourable prognosis.

Background Identifying potential tools that could help improving the standard of care and lead to a better allocation of economic resources represents a main objective of research in public health. Using data from the PRIORITY cohort, this study aims to describe inpatients costs after a discharge for isolated coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG). Methods The PRIORITY project was designed to evaluate the long-term outcomes of 2 large multicenter cohort studies on CABG conducted between 2002-04 and 2007-08. For each patient discharged alive after a CABG intervention, costs of hospitalizations were estimated as the sum of costs of all the admissions occurred during 3 years of follow-up. NHS reimbursement rates were used as standard costs (in Euros). Inpatients costs were analysed according to their baseline risk factors. Results Among the 7363 patients included in this analysis, the median 3-year hospitalization costs were 4341€ (IQR: 1865-11699). Median costs were around 4.000€ for subjects alive at the end of follow up but higher for patients dying within 1 (about 8.600€) and 2-3 years of follow up (about 20.000€). The presence of comorbidities (such as diabetes and cancer) lead to higher median hospitalization costs while the on-pump approach was associated to lower median cost. Sixteen per cent of patients were at zero cost having no re-hospitalizations during the 3 years of follow-up (97% alive). Subjects at zero cost received more frequently on-pump approach, had a lower frequency of cancer, arteriopathy and ictus, but a higher frequency of angina and infarction. Conclusions Inpatient costs after isolated CABG are affected by preoperative comorbidities and by operative variables that could be removed or managed. Identifying independent risk factors for re-hospitalization will lead to the definition of a preoperative clinical and decision-making path that will bring both a clinical advantage for the patient and an optimization of costs for the NHS. Key messages Inpatient costs after isolated CABG are affected by preoperative comorbidities and operative characteristics like the on-pump approach. Appropriate management of operative approaches mainly based on operator preferences can have important implications in terms of healthcare costs.

Background The advantages to use the bilateral internal thoracic artery grafting (BITA) technique for coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) have been recently questioned, but data on long-term follow-up is limited. Using data from the PRIORITY project, this study aims to assess the outcome with the use of BITA grafting and its implications for public health. Methods The PRIORITY project was planned to evaluate the long-term outcomes of two prospective multicenter studies on CABG conducted between 2002-2004 and 2007-2008. Data on isolated CABG were linked to administrative data in order to retrieve patients' late outcome. Time-to-event distributions were analyzed accordingly to primary event-type (death, major adverse cardiac events (MACEs)) using the Kaplan-Meier and the Cox proportional hazards methods. Results The study population consisted of 11021 patients who underwent isolated CABG. BITA grafting was employed in 24.6% of patients. The median follow-up time was 8.0 years (interquartile range 7.6-10.0 years). After adjustment for potential confounding factors, BITA grafting was significantly associated with better survival (HR 0.85, 95%CI 0.76-0.95, p = 0.003). Moreover, using BITA grafting reduced the incidence of MACE (HR 0.87, 95%CI 0.80-0.94, p = 0.001), showing to be a protective factor for recurrent acute myocardial infarction (HR 0.84, 95%CI 0.71-0.99, p = 0.05) and for rehospitalization for percutaneous cardiac intervention (HR 0.82, 95%CI 0.70-0.96, p = 0.013). Conclusions BITA grafting during isolated CABG is associated with survival advantage at 10-year with a significantly reduced incidence of MACE. Being the choice to perform isolated CABG with or without BITA based mainly on operator personal preferences, these findings may have important implications from a public health perspective. Key messages The choice to perform CABG with or without BITA grafting is associated to different outcomes. The choice to perform CABG with or without BITA grafting is mainly based on operator preferences and may have important implications in terms of healthcare expenditures.

The OBSERVANT study evaluated the medium and long-term outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) versus surgical aortic valve replacement obtaining comparative effectiveness results at least for the first-generation devices. The OBSERVANT II study enrolled a new series of TAVI procedures to evaluate whether the use of new-generation devices has modified outcome differences recorded in the OBSERVANT study. The aim of this paper is to describe the clinical characteristics of the OBSERVANT II population and compare them with those of the OBSERVANT population.OBSERVANT II is a prospective multicenter observational study, which enrolled patients with severe aortic stenosis, who underwent a TAVI procedure in 30 Italian centers from December 2016 to September 2018. Clinical, anatomical and procedural information was recorded for each patient as well as procedure characteristics and any periprocedural outcomes. An administrative follow-up will allow to obtain information on medium and long-term outcomes.The enrolled population consists of 3001 patients with a mean age similar to that recorded in OBSERVANT (81.7 ± 6.3 vs 81.9 ± 6.2 years; p=0.336). OBSERVANT II patients show a lower prevalence of several morbid conditions than OBSERVANT patients (i.e. chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, coronary artery disease, peripheral arterial disease, etc.), though having very similar mean values of EuroSCORE II (7.2 ± 7.6% vs 7.4 ± 7.9%; p=0.558). According to three EuroSCORE II risk classes (≤3; 3-7; ≥7), the in-hospital mortality rates for patients enrolled in the two studies are 1.0% vs 2.0% (p≤0.000), 1.4% vs 4.1% (p0.000) and 2.4% vs 7.7% (p0.000), respectively.The first results of the OBSERVANT II study show that patients undergoing TAVI with new-generation devices are elderly, have a lower risk profile than patients enrolled in the OBSERVANT study but comparable mean values of EuroSCORE II. The in-hospital mortality rate for patients enrolled in the OBSERVANT II study is lower than that recorded in the OBSERVANT study across all the EuroSCORE II risk classes.

The OBSERVANT study (Observational Study of Effectiveness of SAVR-TAVI Procedures for Severe Aortic Stenosis Treatment) showed that mortality at 1 year is similar after transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) or surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) for real-world propensity-matched patients with aortic stenosis at low and intermediate risk. We report the 5-year outcomes of the Italian OBSERVANT study.The unadjusted enrolled population (N=7618) between December 2010 and June 2012 included 5707 patients on SAVR and 1911 patients on TAVR. The propensity score method was applied to select 2 groups with similar baseline characteristics. All outcomes were adjudicated through a linkage with administrative databases. The primary end points of this analysis were death from any cause and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events at 5 years. The matched population had a total of 1300 patients (650 per group). The propensity score method generated a low and intermediate-risk population (mean logistic EuroSCORE 2: 5.1±6.2% versus 4.9±5.1%, SAVR versus transfemoral TAVR; P=0.485). At 5 years, the rate of 5 death from any cause was 35.8% in the surgical group and 48.3% in the transcatheter group (hazard ratio, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.12-1.69; P=0.002). Similarly, TAVR was associated with an increased risk of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events as compared with SAVR (42.5% versus 54.0%; hazard ratio, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.11-1.63; P=0.003). The cumulative incidence of cerebrovascular events, myocardial infarction, and coronary revascularization were similar in the study groups at 5 years.The present results suggest that at 5 years, in a real-world population with severe aortic stenosis and at low and intermediate risk, suggest that SAVR is associated in with lower mortality and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events rates than transfemoral TAVR performed using first-generation devices. These data need to be confirmed in randomized trials using new-generation TAVR devices.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of nonagenarians after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) from the OBSERVANT study and to pool the results of the literature on this topic. Aortic stenosis is the most common acquired valvular heart disease in the Western countries, and its prevalence is linked to the phenomenon of population aging. TAVR can be considered as a wise approach to treat nonagenarians, but data on its safety and effectiveness are scarce. Data on 80 patients aged >90 years who underwent TAVR from OBSERVANT study were analyzed. A systematic review and meta-analysis of published data were performed. Thirty-day mortality in the OBSERVANT series was 6.3 %. None of these patients experienced stroke. Permanent pacemaker implantation was necessary in 20 % of patients. Paravalvular regurgitation was observed in 57.5 %. Survival at 1, 2, and 3 years was 79.6, 71.9, and 61.5 %. Ten series provided data on 1227 nonagenarians who underwent TAVR. Pooled 30-day mortality rate was 7.1 %, stroke 2.8 %, vascular access complication 8.8 %, and permanent pacemaker implantation 10.6 %. Paravalvular regurgitation was observed in 60.1 % of patients. Pooled 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates were 79.2, 68.2, and 55.6 %. Transapical TAVR was associated with a significantly higher risk of early mortality compared with transfemoral TAVR. The results of OBSERVANT study and aggregate data meta-analysis suggest that in nonagenarians, TAVR is associated with low postoperative morbidity and excellent intermediate survival. Transapical TAVR in these very elderly is associated with high postoperative mortality.

OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to assess the impact of frailty on the outcome after coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) and whether it may improve the predictive ability of European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE II). METHODS The Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) was assessed preoperatively in patients undergoing isolated CABG from the multicentre E-CABG registry, and patients were stratified into 3 classes: scores 1-2, scores 3-4 and scores 5-7. RESULTS Of the 6156 patients enrolled, 39.2% had CFS scores 1-2, 57.6% scores 3-4, and 3.2% scores 5-7. Logistic regression adjusted for multiple covariates showed that the CFS was an independent predictor of hospital/30-day mortality [CFS scores 3-4, odds ratio (OR) 3.95, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.19-7.14; CFS scores 5-7, OR 5.90, 95% CI 2.67-13.05] and resulted in an Integrated Improvement Index of 1.3 (P

Background Despite the well-known impact of female sex on outcome after surgical aortic valve replacement (sAVR), few studies investigated its role after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Methods After propensity-matching for age, baseline comorbidities, previous interventions, priority, frailty score, New York Heart Association class, left ventricular function and associated cardiac diseases, hospital mortality, and procedure-related morbidities of 388 women (194 TAVR versus 194 sAVR)—of 5,231 patients enrolled in 70 centers participating in this prospective multicenter national registry—were analyzed at a central management unit of the Italian National Institute of Health. Results Although hospital mortality was comparable (4.1% TAVR versus 3.1% sAVR; p = 0.177), women undergoing sAVR showed a higher rate of transfusion (63.9% versus 37.1% TAVR; p = 0.0001); higher number of transfusions per patient (3.6 ± 0.4 versus 2.3 ± 0.3 TAVR; p = 0.049); a higher incidence of low cardiac output state (5.7% versus 3.6% TAVR; p = 0.017) and acute renal failure (8.8% versus 4.1% TAVR; p = 0.01); and higher mean transprosthetic gradients (15.7 ± 12.6 mm Hg versus 11.9 ± 10.7 mm Hg TAVR; p = 0.004). In contrast, women undergoing TAVR experienced significant postprocedural aortic regurgitation (mild, 37.6% versus 7.7% sAVR; moderate-to-severe, 7.1% versus 1.5% sAVR; p = 0.0001) and a higher rate of stroke (7.7% versus 2.5% sAVR; p = 0.037), major vascular complications (9.3% versus 0.5% sAVR; p = 0.0001), pacemaker implantation (12.4% versus 6.2% sAVR; p = 0.004), need for emergent percutaneous coronary intervention (1.0% versus 0% sAVR; p = 0.007), and longer intermediate care unit length of stay (2.5 ± 4.4 days versus 1.4 ± 2.6 days sAVR; p = 0.008). Perioperative myocardial infarction and lengths of intensive care unit stay and hospitalization were comparable (not significant). Conclusions Women undergoing sAVR and TAVR experienced different periprocedural morbidities. These data strongly suggest the need to strictly individualize the indications.

Background Young patients requiring myocardial revascularization are considered at low operative risk, but data on their outcome are scarce. This study was undertaken to evaluate the prevalence and 30-day mortality of patients aged

Background The SYNTAX score (SS) is a determinant of outcome in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. In addition, it has been recently shown that the clinical SYNTAX score (cSS), obtained by adding clinical variables to the SS, improves the predictive power of the resulting risk model. We assessed the hypothesis that the use of the cSS may predict outcomes of patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Methods We measured the SYNTAX score in 874 patients undergoing isolated first time on-pump CABG. The clinical SYNTAX score was calculated at the time of the study using age, creatinine clearance and ejection fraction, the modified ACEF score, and analyses performed for major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) and all-cause mortality at 3-year follow-up. Results The mean age of the study population was 70.9 ± 8.1 years, and the median cSS 14.2 (range 2.1–286.5). The ROC curve analysis showed that a cSS >14.5 (81.4% sensitivity and 67.8% specificity) was a reliable tool in discrimination of patients for the occurrence of MACCE (AUC 0.78) and all-cause mortality (AUC 0.74). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis confirmed that patients belonging to higher cSS quartiles have poorer 3-year survival ( P = .0001) and MACCE-free survival ( P = .0001), with respect to those with lower cSS. Conclusions This observational study has shown that the clinical SYNTAX score, incorporating the lesion-based SS and clinical-based ACEF score, predicted mid-term adverse outcomes of patients undergoing CABG and may play an important role in the risk stratification of this population. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Excellent late survival is expected after coronary artery bypass (CABG) in patients aged ≥80 years, but immediate postoperative mortality can be rather high. This study was planned to identify variables associated with very high operative risk in these fragile patients. This is a multicenter study including 2,246 patients aged ≥80 years who underwent isolated CABG at 68 Italian hospitals. The proportion of patients aged ≥80 years varied from 1.7 to 13.6 % (overall 5.6 %, p < 0.0001) in different institutions. The median logistic EuroSCORE varied from 6.2 to 31.7 % (overall median 11.3 %, p =

Current guidelines state that cardiac rehabilitation is indicated after the acute phase of major cardiovascular diseases and interventions; on the other hand implementation of these indications is difficult because of several barriers, i.e. the number of patients per year with an indication exceeds by far the accommodation offer of cardiac rehabilitation centers; the demand for access to cardiac rehabilitation from acute cardiac care hospitals is low because the attention is focused on the acute phase of cardiac diseases. The present Consensus Document describes the changes in clinical epidemiology of the main cardiovascular diseases, showing that complications are increasingly more frequent in the postacute phase, especially in the setting of myocardial infarction. The Joint ANMCO/IACPR-GICR Committee defines priority criteria based on clinical risk for admission to cardiac rehabilitation centers as inpatients. This Consensus Document represents, therefore, an important step forward in the search for continuity of care in high-risk patients during the post-acute phase.

Coronary revascularization methods are among the most common major medical procedures performed in industrialized countries. The short- and long-term comparative effectiveness of different techniques remains undetermined.The study population included all adult patients (94,864 subjects) admitted for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in 2004 in Italy, as recorded in the National Hospital Discharge Records. Invasive reperfusion therapy (coronary artery bypass graft, percutaneous coronary intervention), and standard medical treatments were compared. End points were short-term (30-day) in-hospital mortality and any combination of new revascularizations, re-AMI, stroke, or death (MACCE) occurring within 6 and 12 months from initial treatment. Risk factors and comorbidities were used to define patients' health status. The Cox model was applied to evaluate risk-adjusted hazard ratios (HR) for different approaches. Medical treatment was used as the reference category. Propensity score matching was performed to evaluate selection bias in the allocation to CABG or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Both short-term mortality and 6- and 12-month MACCE risk for invasive reperfusion therapy was significantly lower than the reference (HR: 0.50, P0.001; 0.54, P0.001; 0.64, P0.001, respectively). In the matched population, while short-term mortality was significantly lower for PCI (HR 0.36, P0.001), long-term MACCE risk was lower for CABG (6-month HR 2.93, P0.001; 12-month HR 3.01, P0.001).In spite of adjustments for patients' health status, medical treatment resulted in a higher mortality and increased MACCE risk. While PCI gave the best short-term results, after 1 year the risk of re-interventions or further events was significantly lower for patients undergoing CABG.

Objectives: To compare the risk-adjustment model empirically derived from the 'Italian CABG Outcome Project' with that of the additive and logistic EuroSCORE in terms of accuracy, predictive power and ability to rank hospital performances.Methods: The Italian CABG model, the logistic and additive EuroSCORE were applied to the Italian CABG population; the observed deaths/expected deaths (O/E) ratios, as obtained by the three models, werecomputedfor eachItaliancardiacsurgery centreandforsixclassesofrisk-stratifiedpatients.The performanceofthethreemodelsin predictingthe30-daymortalitywasformallyassessedforcalibration(Hosmer—Lemeshowtest)anddiscrimination(ROCarea).Accordingtothethree models, risk-adjusted mortality rates (RAMR = O/EItalian CABG population mortality rate) were estimated for each centre; possible differences were detected in the identification of hospitals with mortality rates higher and lower than average. Results: The Italian CABG model uses fewer variables than the EuroSCORE system (14 vs 17) and exhibits the best performance in terms of discrimination and calibration. Contrary to the other testedmodels,thelogisticEuroSCOREshowsasignificantHosmer—Lemeshowtest(x 2� L ¼ 19:30,p < 0.0001),indicatingunsatisfactorycalibration, and a clear predicteddeath overestimationineach ofthe consideredriskclasses(O/E = 0.4). When a proper recalibrationprocedure is applied, the logistic EuroSCORE performance parameters achieve acceptable levels. The Italian CABG model identified seven centres as having higher than averagemortality,whiletheEuroSCOREidentifiedthesamesevencentresplusoneother.TheItalianCABGmodelidentifiedeightcentreswithlower than average mortality, five of which were identified by the additive EuroSCORE and four of which were identified by the logistic EuroSCORE. The additiveEuroSCOREidentifiedfourmoreandthelogisticEuroSCOREthree morelowmortalitycentres.Conclusions:Althoughthisanalysisrevealsa satisfactoryconcordancebetweenresultsfromthethreemodels,adetailedcomparisonshowsthattheItalianCABGmodelusesfewervariablesand performsbetterthantheothers.Nevertheless,whenproperlyrecalibrated,theEuroSCOREmodelcanbeexportedtotheItalianpopulationandused to rank hospital performance and evaluate preoperative risk of patients undergoing open-heart surgery. # 2007 European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Background Myocardial revascularization in young patients should be durable enough to avoid new cardiovascular events or repeated revascularization procedures. The aim of this study was to evaluate the late outcomes of patients less than 50 years of age undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in comparison with older patients. Methods This study was a survival analysis of a pooled multicenter prospective cohort of patients who underwent CABG. Results Five percent of patients (572 of 11,087) were less than 50 years of age. The prevalence of female sex, pulmonary disease, diabetes, stroke, and extracardiac arteriopathy was lower compared with that in older patients. Left ventricular function was more well preserved in patients less than 50 years of age, but the prevalence of recent myocardial infarction and the need for emergency surgical intervention was significantly higher in young patients. Multiple propensity score–adjusted analysis showed that patients aged less than 50 years had a significantly lower risk of mortality, even when compared with the 50- to 59-year stratum. In the propensity score–matched population (544 pairs), patients less than 50 years of age had significantly better 7-year outcomes compared with patients aged 50 years or more: survival (95.6% versus 81.1%; p p = 0.009), freedom from major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) (76.6% versus 63.9%; p = 0.002). Similar freedom from myocardial infarction (90.1% versus 90.1%; p = 0.68) and repeated revascularization (87.1% versus 87.2%; p = 0.65) was observed in patients less than 50 years of age and those older than 50 years. Conclusions Patients less than 50 years of age undergoing CABG have an excellent outcome compared with elderly patients. These data indicate that despite its premature onset, coronary artery disease in young patients does not have a more aggressive course than that in older patients.

The debate on the advantages and limitations of off-pump (OP) vs on pump (ON) CABG has not still arrived to a conclusion and concerns still exist on graft patency. Aim of this study was to compare the impact of OPCABG and ONCABG on mortality and morbidity, with a specific focus on mid-term need for

Objective: During the last decade, a worldwide growing interest in evaluating performance of health services through ‘outcome studies’ took place. This study started in early 2002 and represents the first National Health System (NHS) experience to evaluate adjusted performance indicators at national level. The aim of this study was to compare 30 days mortality after coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) between cardiac surgery centres, adjusting by confounding risk factors. Methods: All patients, aged 15—99 years, undergoing a CABG intervention after 1st January 2002 in 82 participating centres were eligible for this observational longitudinal study. For each patient, data on severity and risk factors were collected (type of procedure, haemodynamic condition, co-morbidities, recent myocardial infarction and unstable angina, ventricular function, emergency condition, vital status at 30 days). Using a multiple logistic regression analysis the best predictive model was developed for risk-adjustment; a cross-validation procedure was applied; specific risk adjusted mortality rates (RAMR) were estimated. The overall study population was used as reference standard. Results: 34,310 isolated CABG were performed in 64 of the 82 participating centres. Thirty days mortality resulted 2.61%, ranging from 0.33 to 7.63%; eight centres presented a RAMR significantly lower and seven significantly higher than the reference. Conclusions: The study provides valid measures of the heterogeneity between outcomes of the Italian cardiac surgery centres, to support decision-makingbyNHS management and individualpatients. Althoughnotstatisticallysignificant, RAMRdroppedfromyear 2002 to 2004 (2.8—2.4%) suggesting that this comparative outcome assessment can contribute to the improvement of performances in cardiac surgery. # 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

We read with interest the comments by Dr. Spadaccio and colleagues regarding the results of the OBSERVANT (Italian Observational Multicenter Registry) study, and we thank them for giving us the opportunity to clarify some of the issues raised in their letter. First, we would like to emphasize that

PURPOSE: To examine prospectively the relationship between vegetable consumption and long-term survival. METHODS: In 1965, a total of 1536 Italian males from two Italian rural cohorts of the Seven Countries Study, aged 45–65 years, were examined. Information on lifestyle and food consumption collected at this visit, and total and cause-specific mortality data collected in 30 years of follow-up were analyzed for the present study. RESULTS: During a period of 30 years, 1096 deaths occurred (308 from coronary heart disease, 325 from cancer, 158 from cerebrovascular disease and 305 from all other causes). The age-adjusted life expectancy for men consuming more than 60 g/day of vegetables was nearly 2 years longer than for men consuming less than 20 g/day. This increase in survival was more striking in smokers than nonsmokers (2.1 vs. a 1 year gain). The association also held for both geographic cohorts, although the pattern of vegetable consumption was very different in the two villages. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest a positive association between vegetable intake and life expectancy. Vegetable intake may be especially protective for smokers although the biological explanation for such an effect is unclear.