Search

High b-value diffusion-weighted imaging (hDWI) with a b-value of 2000 s/mm2 provides insufficient image contrast between benign and malignant tissues and an overlap of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) between Gleason grades (GG) in prostate cancer (PC). We compared image quality, PC detectability, and discrimination ability for PC aggressiveness between ultra-high b-value DWI (uhDWI) of 3000 s/mm2 and hDWI. The subjects were 49 patients with PC who underwent 3T multiparametric MRI. Single-shot echo-planar DWI was acquired with b-values of 0, 2000, and 3000 s/mm2. Anatomical distortion of prostate (AD), signal intensity of benign prostate (PSI), and lesion conspicuity score (LCS) were assessed using a 4-point scale; and signal-to-noise ratio, contrast-to-noise ratio, and mean ADC (×10–3 mm2/s) of lesion (lADC) and surrounding benign region (bADC) were measured. PSI was significantly lower in uhDWI than in hDWI (p < 0.001). AD, LCS, signal-to-noise ratio, and contrast-to-noise ratio were comparable between uhDWI and hDWI (all p > 0.05). In contrast, lADC was significantly lower than bADC in both uhDWI and hDWI (both p < 0.001). In comparison of lADC between tumors of ≤GG2 and those of ≥GG3, both uhDWI and hDWI showed significant difference (p = 0.007 and p = 0.021, respectively). AUC for separating tumors of ≤GG2 from those of ≥GG3 was 0.731 in hDWI and 0.699 in uhDWI (p = 0.161). uhDWI suppressed background signal better than hDWI, but did not contribute to increased diagnostic performance in PC. Compared with hDWI, uhDWI could not contribute to increased diagnostic performance in PC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

High b-value diffusion-weighted imaging (hDWI) with a b-value of 2000 s/mm2 provides insufficient image contrast between benign and malignant tissues and an overlap of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) between Gleason grades (GG) in prostate cancer (PC). We compared image quality, PC detectability, and discrimination ability for PC aggressiveness between ultra-high b-value DWI (uhDWI) of 3000 s/mm2 and hDWI. The subjects were 49 patients with PC who underwent 3T multiparametric MRI. Single-shot echo-planar DWI was acquired with b-values of 0, 2000, and 3000 s/mm2. Anatomical distortion of prostate (AD), signal intensity of benign prostate (PSI), and lesion conspicuity score (LCS) were assessed using a 4-point scale; and signal-to-noise ratio, contrast-to-noise ratio, and mean ADC (×10–3 mm2/s) of lesion (lADC) and surrounding benign region (bADC) were measured. PSI was significantly lower in uhDWI than in hDWI (p < 0.001). AD, LCS, signal-to-noise ratio, and contrast-to-noise ratio were comparable between uhDWI and hDWI (all p > 0.05). In contrast, lADC was significantly lower than bADC in both uhDWI and hDWI (both p < 0.001). In comparison of lADC between tumors of ≤GG2 and those of ≥GG3, both uhDWI and hDWI showed significant difference (p = 0.007 and p = 0.021, respectively). AUC for separating tumors of ≤GG2 from those of ≥GG3 was 0.731 in hDWI and 0.699 in uhDWI (p = 0.161). uhDWI suppressed background signal better than hDWI, but did not contribute to increased diagnostic performance in PC. Compared with hDWI, uhDWI could not contribute to increased diagnostic performance in PC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Generic oxaliplatin is widely used in colorectal cancer chemotherapy; however, studies on the adverse events of generic drugs are limited. We investigated the safety of brand-name and generic oxaliplatin used in capecitabine plus oxaliplatin(plus bevacizumab: Bmab)for colorectal cancer treatment., Participants and Methods: A total of 86 patients who newly started CAPOX(plus Bmab)between January 2018 and January 2022 were included in this retrospective study, excluding those who changed to generic from the brand-name drug during the chemotherapy course., Results: Forty-seven patients(54.6%)were in the generic drug(GE)group, while 39 patients(45.4%)were in the brand drug(EP)group. No significant difference was observed in the patient characteristics between the GE and EP groups. The median number of oxaliplatin administrations were 4 and 5 cycles in the GE and EP groups, respectively. Neutropenia of Grade 2 or higher was observed in 51.1%(24 patients)and 33.3%(13 patients)in the GE and EP groups, respectively. Hypersensitivity was observed in 14.9%(7 patients)and 7.7%(3 patients)in the GE and EP groups, respectively., Conclusion: There were no statistically significant differences between generic and brand-name oxaliplatin in the frequency of adverse events.