Search

Funding Information: The recently completed EU human biomonitoring initiative (HBM4EU, www.hbm4eu.eu/about-hbm4eu/), was a European Joint Programme that aimed to harmonise the collection and use of biomonitoring data to better understand human exposure to chemicals in the environment, in occupational settings and through the use of consumer products to improve chemical risk assessment and management efforts, and to support policy making (Ganzleben et al., 2017). Within the context of the HBM4EU project several priority substances were selected for investigation based on the most important needs of policy makers and risk assessors, as well as common needs of participating countries and a broad range of other stakeholders including trade unions (Ougier et al., 2021). Many of the priority substances, along with having an important economic role, also pose health risks for workers due to their occupational use. One of the priority substances was hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)), which was the main focus of the first of a series of three different HBM4EU occupational studies (Santonen et al. 2019a, 2022), the other two being focussed on electronic waste (E-waste) and diisocyanates exposures (Jones et al., 2022; Scheepers et al., 2021). In addition to Cr(VI), it was recognised that in chrome plating activities there may also be exposure to another group of HBM4EU priority chemicals, per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs). PFASs, including PFOS (perfluorooctane sulfonate), have been used as mist suppressants in chrome plating baths to prevent the evaporation of Cr(VI) vapours (Blepp et al., 2017; Gluge et al., 2020). Although PFOS has now been largely replaced in the EU, many of its substitutes in chrome plating activities are also PFASs which may cause similar health and environmental concerns.Occupational exposure to Cr(VI) has been associated with an increased risk of lung and sinonasal cancers and is suspected to lead to gastrointestinal tract cancers (den Braver-Sewradj et al., 2021; ECHA 2013; IARC 2012). In addition, it is a common cause of occupational asthma, allergic dermatitis and there is a concern for adverse effects on reproductive health (Sun and Costa 2022). Exposure to Cr(VI) may occur in several occupational activities, e.g., in welding, Cr(VI) electroplating and other surface treatment processes such as paint application and removal of old paint containing Cr(VI) (SCOEL 2017). In order to limit the workers’ exposure to Cr(VI) in the EU, Cr(VI) is currently regulated under both the European regulation (EC 1907/2006) on the Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals (REACH) and the EU Directive 2004/37/EC on the protection of workers from the risks related to exposure to carcinogens, mutagens or reprotoxic substances at work (CMRD) (EU 2004). The current binding Occupational Exposure Limit (OEL) set under the EU Directive 2004/37/EC is 10 μg/m3 (8-h time-weighted average (8-h TWA)) until January 17, 2025. After that period, the OEL (8-h TWA) will be reduced to 5 μg/m3. For welding, plasma-cutting processes and similar work processes that generate fumes, there is a derogation with an OEL of 25 μg/m³ (8-h TWA) until January 2025; after that date the OEL (8-h TWA) of 5 μg/m3 will be applicable. France, the Netherlands and Denmark already have stricter limits, with an OEL of 1 μg/m3 (8-h TWA) for Cr(VI) in all uses (Beskæftigelsesministeriet 2020; Ministère du travail, 2012; MinSZW 2016). In the US, the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH) has published, for inhalable Cr(VI) compounds, a threshold limit value (TLV) of 0.2 μg/m3 (8-h TWA) and a TLV Short-Term Exposure Limit (STEL) of 0.5 μg/m3 (ACGIH 2021). No EU-wide biological limit values (BLVs) for Cr(VI) are available, however some Member States have set BLVs for occupational exposure to Cr(VI), measured as urinary chromium (U–Cr). For example, France and Finland have derived BLVs of 2.5 μg/L and 10 μg/L corresponding to their respective OELs of 1 μg/m3 and 5 μg/m3 for Cr(VI) (ANSES 2017; STM 2020). The German Research Foundation (DFG 2020) has established biological exposure equivalents for carcinogenic substances (EKA values), ranging from 12 to 40 μg/L for U–Cr. These correspond to exposures ranging between 30 and 100 μg/m3 soluble alkaline chromate and/or Cr(VI) containing welding fumes over an 8-h work shift (Bolt and Lewalter 2012). Since these current national BLVs are mainly based on studies from plating workers, they include uncertainties especially concerning their applicability to workplaces other than the electroplating industry. One of the main aims of the HBM4EU chromates study was to provide EU relevant data on the current occupational Cr(VI) exposure to support the regulatory risk assessment and decision-making process. In addition, exposure to PFASs was evaluated in a subset of workers performing chrome plating activities.This project has received funding from the European Union's Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement No 733032 and received co-funding from the author's organizations and/or Ministries. The project team would like to thank all the companies and workers who participated in the HBM4EU chromates study and all the experts who have contributed to the conduct of the study. Participants of the HBM4EU chromates study workshop and policy questionnaires are also acknowledged. Mr. Jouko Remes and Dr. Kia Gluschkoff (Finnish Institute of Occupational Health) are acknowledged for their assistance with the statistical analyses and figures. Funding Information: This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program under grant agreement No 733032 and received co-funding from the author's organizations and/or Ministries. Publisher Copyright: © 2022 The Authors Within the EU human biomonitoring initiative (HBM4EU), a targeted, multi-national study on occupational exposure to hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)) was performed. Cr(VI) is currently regulated in EU under REACH (Registration, Evaluation, Authorisation and Restriction of Chemicals) and under occupational safety and health (OSH) legislation. It has recently been subject to regulatory actions to improve its risk management in European workplaces. Analysis of the data obtained within the HBM4EU chromates study provides support both for the implementation of these regulatory actions and for national enforcement programs and may also contribute to the updating of occupational limit values (OELs) and biological limit values for Cr(VI). It also provides useful insights on the contribution of different risk management measures (RMMs) to further reduce the exposure to Cr(VI) and may support the evaluation of applications for authorisation under REACH. Findings on chrome platers’ additional per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) exposure highlight the need to also pay attention to this substance group in the metals sector. A survey performed to evaluate the policy relevance of the HBM4EU chromates study findings supports the usefulness of the study results. According to the responses received from the survey, the HBM4EU chromates study was able to demonstrate the added value of the human biomonitoring (HBM) approach in assessment and management of occupational exposure to Cr(VI). For future occupational studies, we emphasise the need for engagement of policy makers and regulators throughout the whole research process to ensure awareness, relevance and uptake of the results in future policies. publishersversion published

Introduction: Phthalates, a group of ubiquitous industrial chemicals, have been widely used in occupational settings, mainly as plasticizers in a variety of applications. Occupational exposure to different phthalates has been studied in several occupational settings using human biomonitoring (HBM). Aim: To provide a comprehensive review of the available literature on occupational exposure to phthalates assessed using HBM and to determine future data needs on the topic as part of the HBM4EU project. Methods: A systematic search was carried out in the databases of Pubmed, Scopus, and Web of Science for articles published between 2000 and September 4, 2019 using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. A total of 22 studies on the occupational HBM of phthalates was considered suitable for review. Results and discussion: Among the reviewed studies, 19 (86%) focused on DEHP, an old phthalate that is now subject to authorization and planned to be restricted in the EU. Concentrations of MEHHP, one of its metabolites, varied up to 13-fold between studies and across sectors when comparing extreme geometric means, ranging from 11.6 (similar to the general populations) to 151 μg/g creatinine. Only 2 studies focused on newer phthalates such as DiNP and DPHP. Concerning the geographical distribution, 10 studies were performed in Europe (including 6 in Slovakia), 8 in Asia, and 4 in North America, but this distribution is not a good reflection of phthalate production and usage levels worldwide. Most HBM studies were performed in the context of PVC product manufacturing. Future studies should focus on: i) a more uniform approach to sampling timing to facilitate comparisons between studies; ii) newer phthalates; and iii) old phthalates in waste management or recycling. Conclusion: Our findings highlight the lack of recent occupational HBM studies on both old and new phthalate exposure in European countries and the need for a harmonized approach. Considering the important policy actions taken in Europe regarding phthalates, it seems relevant to evaluate the impact of these actions on exposure levels and health risks for workers. publishersversion published

The brain as a complex energy-informational system is dynamic structure, which during intrauterine development in humans changes within each gestational week. The dramatic introduction of endocrine disruptors in living systems on Earth is significantly reflected in the number of diseases, obesity, and infertility. Brain due to its complexity demand a specific scientific approach especially during intrauterine development. Development of program, which will enable the introduction of a test platform for recognition of disturbances within a horizontal, vertical and modular activity frames in the brain during development caused by xenobiotics, such as endocrine disruptors, is of great significance.

This is an initial report on the study design and collection of samples from occupational studies under Task 8.5 of the HBM4EU project. The occupational studies aim to collect EU relevant data on work related exposures to prioritised substances using harmonised methods and questionnaires. Hexavalent chromium is the focus of the first occupational study as there was a regulatory need for occupational exposure data as well as the requirement to test new more sensitive methods for biomonitoring.

Endocrine disruptors (EDs) belong to large and diverse groups of agents that may cause multiple biological effects associated with, for example, hormone imbalance and infertility, chronic diseases such as diabetes, genome damage and cancer. The health risks related with the exposure to EDs are typically underestimated, less well characterized, and not regulated to the same extent as, for example, carcinogens. The increased production and utilization of identified or suspected EDs in many different technological processes raises new challenges with respect to occupational exposure settings and associated health risks. Due to the specific profile of health risk, occupational exposure to EDs demands a new paradigm in health risk assessment, redefinition of exposure assessment, new effects biomarkers for occupational health surveillance and definition of limit values. The construction and plastics industries are among the strongest economic sectors, employing millions of workers globally. They also use large quantities of chemicals that are known or suspected EDs. Focusing on these two industries, this short communication discusses: (a) why occupational exposure to EDs needs a more specific approach to occupational health risk assessments, (b) identifies the current knowledge gaps, and (c) identifies and gives a rationale for a future occupational health paradigm, which will include ED biomarkers as a relevant parameter in occupational health risk assessment, surveillance and exposure prevention. publishersversion published