Search

Objectives: This study compared the performance of a dynamic partial tripolar cochlear implant speech encoding strategy termed dynamic current focusing (DCF) to monopolar stimulation (MP) using spectro-temporal, temporal, and speech-in-noise recognition testing. Design: DCF is a strategy that utilizes tripolar or high partial tripolar stimulation at threshold level and increases loudness by slowly widening current spread towards most comfortable level. Thirteen cochlear implant users were fitted with DCF and a non-steered MP matched on pulse rate, pulse width, and active electrodes. Nine participants completed the single-blinded within-subject crossover trial. Repeated testing consisted of four sessions. Strategies were allocated in a DCF-MP-DCF-MP or MP-DCF-MP-DCF design. Three-week adaptation periods ended with a test session in which speech-in-noise recognition (matrix speech-in-noise sentence test), spectro-temporal ripple tests (SMRT and STRIPES) and a temporal amplitude modulation detection test were conducted. All participants recorded their subjective experiences with both strategies using the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale questionnaire. Results: Participants' SMRT thresholds improved 0.40 ripples per octave (p = 0.02, Bonferroni-corrected: p = 0.1) with DCF over MP at 65 dB SPL. No significant differences between the strategies were found on speech-in-noise recognition at conversational (65 dB SPL) and soft (45 dB SPL) loudness levels, temporal testing, STRIPES, or the SMRT at 45 dB SPL. After Bonferroni correction, a learning effect remained on the matrix speech-in-noise sentence test at both loudness levels (65 dB SPL: p = 0.01; 45 dB SPL: p = 0.02). There was no difference in learning effects over time between DCF and MP. Similarly, no significant differences were found in subjective experience on the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing Scale questionnaire. DCF reduced average battery life by 48% (5.1 hours) (p < 0.001) compared to MP. Conclusions: DCF may improve spectral resolution over MP at comfortable loudness (65 dB SPL) in cochlear implant users. However, the evidence collected in this study was weak and the significant result disappeared after Bonferroni correction. Also, not all spectral tests revealed this improvement. As expected, battery life was reduced for DCF. Although the current study is limited by its small sample size, considering previous studies, DCF does not consistently improve speech recognition in noise over MP strategies.

Performing simulations with a realistic biophysical auditory nerve fiber model can be very time-consuming, due to the complex nature of the calculations involved. Here, a surrogate (approximate) model of such an auditory nerve fiber model was developed using machine learning methods, to perform simulations more efficiently. Several machine learning models were compared, of which a Convolutional Neural Network showed the best performance. In fact, the Convolutional Neural Network was able to emulate the behavior of the auditory nerve fiber model with extremely high similarity ( R 2 > 0 . 99 ), tested under a wide range of experimental conditions, whilst reducing the simulation time by five orders of magnitude. In addition, a method for randomly generating charge-balanced waveforms using hyperplane projection is introduced. In the second part of this paper, the Convolutional Neural Network surrogate model was used by an Evolutionary Algorithm to optimize the shape of the stimulus waveform in terms of energy efficiency. The resulting waveforms resemble a positive Gaussian-like peak, preceded by an elongated negative phase. When comparing the energy of the waveforms generated by the Evolutionary Algorithm with the commonly used square wave, energy decreases of 8%-45% were observed for differ-ent pulse durations. These results were validated with the original auditory nerve fiber model, which demonstrates that the proposed surrogate model can be used as its accurate and efficient replacement.(c) 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )

Objectives: Many studies have assessed the performance of individuals with cochlear implants (CIs) with electrically evoked compound action potentials (eCAPs). These eCAP-based studies have focused on the amplitude information of the response, without considering the temporal firing properties of the excited auditory nerve fibers (ANFs), such as neural latency and synchrony. These temporal features have been associated with neural health in animal studies and, consequently, could be of importance to clinical CI outcomes. With a deconvolution method, combined with a unitary response, the eCAP can be mathematically unraveled into the compound discharge latency distribution (CDLD). The CDLD reflects both the number and the temporal firing properties of excited ANFs. The present study aimed to determine to what extent the CDLD derived from intraoperatively recorded eCAPs is related to speech perception in individuals with CIs. Design: This retrospective study acquired data on monosyllabic word recognition scores and intraoperative eCAP amplitude growth functions from 124 adult patients with postlingual deafness that received the Advanced Bionics HiRes 90K device. The CDLD was determined for each recorded eCAP waveform by deconvolution. Each of the two Gaussian components of the CDLD was described by three parameters: the amplitude, the firing latency (the average latency of each component of the CDLD), and the variance of the CDLD components (an indication of the synchronicity of excited ANFs). Apart from these six CDLD parameters, the area under the CDLD curve (AUCD) and the slope of the AUCD growth function were determined as well. The AUCD was indicative of the total number of excited ANFs over time. The slope of the AUCD growth function indicated the increases in the number of excited ANFs with stimulus level. Associations between speech perception and each of these eight CDLD-related parameters were investigated with linear mixed modeling. Results: In individuals with CIs, larger amplitudes of the two CDLD components, greater AUCD, and steeper slopes of the AUCD growth function were all significantly associated with better speech perception. In addition, a smaller latency variance in the early CDLD component, but not in the late, was significantly associated with better speech recognition scores. Speech recognition was not significantly dependent on CDLD latencies. The AUCD and the slope of the AUCD growth function provided a similar explanation of the variance in speech perception (R-2) as the eCAP amplitude, the slope of the amplitude growth function, the amplitude, and variance of the first CDLD component. Conclusion: The results demonstrate that both the number and the neural synchrony of excited ANFs, as revealed by CDLDs, are indicative of postimplantation speech perception in individuals with a CI. Because the CDLD-based parameters yielded a higher significance than the eCAP amplitude or the AGF slope, the authors conclude that CDLDs can serve as a clinical predictor of the survival of ANFs and that they have predictive value for postoperative speech perception performance. Thus, it would be worthwhile to incorporate the CDLD into eCAP measures in future clinical applications.

Introduction: Contralateral routing of signals (CROS) overcomes the head shadow effect by redirecting speech signals from the contralateral ear to the better-hearing cochlear implant (CI) ear. Here we tested the performance of an adaptive monaural beamformer (MB) and a fixed binaural beamformer (BB) using the CROS system of Advanced Bionics. Methods: In a group of 17 unilateral CI users, we evaluated the benefits of MB and BB for speech recognition by measuring speech reception threshold (SRT) with and without beamforming. MB and BB were additionally evaluated with signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) measurements using a KEMAR manikin. We also assessed the effect of residual hearing in the CROS ear on the benefits of MB and BB. Speech was delivered in front of the listener in a background of homogeneous 8-talker babble noise. Results: With CI-CROS in omnidirectional settings with the T-mic active on the CI as a reference, BB significantly improved SRT by 1.4 dB, whereas MB yielded no significant improvements. The difference in effects on SRT between the two beamformers was, however, not significant. SNR effects were substantially larger, at 2.1 dB for MB and 5.8 dB for BB. CI-CROS with default omnidirectional settings also improved SRT and SNR by 1 dB over CI alone. Residual hearing did not significantly affect beamformer performance. Discussion: We recommend the use of BB over MB for CI-CROS users. Residual hearing in the CROS ear is not a limiting factor for fitting a CROS device, although a bimodal option should be considered.

Objective: Spread of excitation (SOE) in cochlear implants (CI) is a measure linked to the specificity of the electrode-neuron interface. The SOE can be estimated objectively by electrically evoked compound action potential (eCAP) measurements, recorded with the forward-masking paradigm in CI recipients. The eCAP amplitude can be plotted as a function of the roving masker, resulting in a spatial forward masking (SFM) curve. The eCAP amplitudes presented in the SFM curves, however, reflect an interaction between a masker and probe stimulus, making the SFM curves less reliable for examining SOE effects at the level of individual electrode contacts. To counter this, our previously published deconvolution method estimates the SOE at the electrode level by deconvolving the SFM curves (Biesheuvel et al., 2016). The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of stimulus level on the SOE of individual electrode contacts by using SFM curves analyzed with our deconvolution method.Design: Following the deconvolution method, theoretical SFM curves were calculated by the convolution of parameterized excitation density profiles (EDP) attributable to masker and probe stimuli. These SFM curves were subsequently fitted to SFM curves from CI recipients by iteratively adjusting the EDPs. We first improved the EDP parameterization to account for stimulus-level effects and validated this updated parameterization by comparing the EDPs to simulated excitation density profiles (sEDP) from our computational model of the human cochlea. Secondly, we analyzed SFM curves recorded with varying probe stimulus level in 24 patients, all implanted with a HiFocus Mid-Scala electrode array. With the deconvolution method extended to account for stimulus level effects, the SFM curves measured with varying probe stimulus levels were converted into EDPs to elucidate the effects of stimulus level on the SOE.Results: The updated EDP parameterization was in good agreement with the sEDPs from the computational model. Using the extended deconvolution method, we found that higher stimulus levels caused significant widening of EDPs ( p < 0.001). The stimulus level also affected the EDP amplitude ( p < 0.001) and the center of excitation ( p < 0.05). Concerning the raw SFM curves, an increase in current level led to higher SFM curve amplitudes ( p < 0.001), while the width of the SFM curves did not change significantly ( p = 0.62).Conclusion: The extended deconvolution method enabled us to study the effect of stimulus level on excitation areas in an objective way, as the EDP parameterization was in good agreement with sEDPs from our computational model. The analysis of SFM curves provided new insights into the effect of the stimulus level on SOE. We found that the EDPs, and therefore the SOE, mainly became wider when the stimulus level increased. Lastly, the comparison of the EDP parameterization with simulations in our computation model provided new insights about the validity of the deconvolution method.(c) 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )

Hypothesis: Insertion speed during cochlear implantation determines the risk of cochlear trauma. By slowing down insertion speed tactile feedback is improved. This is highly conducive to control the course of the electrode array along the cochlear contour and prevent translocation from the scala tympani to the scala vestibuli. Background: Limiting insertion trauma is a dedicated goal in cochlear implantation to maintain the most favorable situation for electrical stimulation of the remaining stimulable neural components of the cochlea. Surgical technique is one of the potential influencers on translocation behavior of the electrode array. Methods: The intrascalar position of 226 patients, all implanted with a precurved electrode array, aiming a mid-scalar position, was evaluated. One group (n = 113) represented implantation with an insertion time less than 25 seconds (fast insertion) and the other group (n = 113) was implanted in 25 or more seconds (slow insertion). A logistic regression analysis studied the effect of insertion speed on insertion trauma, controlled for surgical approach, cochlear size, and angular insertion depth. Furthermore, the effect of translocation on speech performance was evaluated using a linear mixed model. Results: The translocation rate within the fast and slow insertion groups were respectively 27 and 10%. A logistic regression analysis showed that the odds of dislocation increases by 2.527 times with a fast insertion, controlled for surgical approach, cochlear size, and angular insertion depth (95% CI = 1.135, 5.625). We failed to find a difference in speech recognition between patients with and without translocated electrode arrays. Conclusion: Slowing down insertion speed till 25 seconds or longer reduces the incidence of translocation.

Background: The refractory recovery function (RRF) measures the electrically evoked compound action potential (eCAP) in response to a second pulse (probe) after masking by a first pulse (masker). This RRF is usually used to assess the refractory properties of the electrically stimulated auditory nerve (AN) by recording the eCAP amplitude as a function of the masker probe interval. Instead of assessing eCAP amplitudes only, recorded waveforms can also be described as a combination of a short-latency component (S-eCAP) and a long-latency component (L-eCAP). It has been suggested that these two components originate from two different AN fiber populations with differing refractory properties. The main objective of this study was to explore whether the refractory characteristics revealed by S-eCAP, L-eCAP, and the raw eCAP (R-eCAP) differ from each other. For clinical relevance, we compared these refractory properties between children and adults and examined whether they are related to cochlear implant (CI) outcomes.Design: In this retrospective study, the raw RRF (R-RRF) was obtained from 121 Hi-Focus Mid-Scala or 1 J cochlear implant (Advanced Bionics, Valencia, CA) recipients. Each R-eCAP of the R-RRF was split into an S-eCAP and an L-eCAP using deconvolution to produce two new RRFs: S-RRF and L-RRF. The refractory properties were characterized by fitting an exponential decay function with three parameters: the absolute refractory period (T); the saturation level (A); and the speed of recovery from nerve refractoriness ( Tau), i.e., a measure of the relative refractory period. We compared the parameters of the R-RRF (R T , R A , R Tau) with those obtained from the S-RRF (S T , S A , S Tau) and L-RRF (L T , L A , L Tau) and investigated whether these parameters differed between children and adults. In addition, we examined the associations between these parameters and speech perception in adults with CI. Linear mixed modeling was used for the analyses.Results: We found that T R was significantly longer than S T and L T , and S T was significantly longer than L T . R A was significantly larger than S A and L A , and S A was significantly larger than L A . Also, S Tau was significantly longer in comparison to R Tau and L Tau, but no significant difference was found between R Tau and L Tau. Children presented a significantly larger S A and L A and a shorter R T in comparison to adults. Shorter S Tau was significantly associated with better speech perception in adult CI recipients, but other parameters were not.Conclusion: We demonstrated that the two components of the eCAP have different refractory properties and that these also differ from those of the R-eCAP. In comparison with the R-eCAP, the refractory properties derived from the S-eCAP and L-eCAP can reveal additional clinical implications in terms of the refractory difference between children and adults as well as speech performance after implantation. Thus, it is worthwhile considering the two components of the eCAP in the future when assessing the clinical value of the auditory refractory properties.

The main aim of this computational modelling study was to test the validity of the hypothesis that sensitivity to the polarity of cochlear implant stimulation can be interpreted as a measure of neural health. For this purpose, the effects of stimulus polarity on neural excitation patterns were investigated in a volume conduction model of the implanted human cochlea, which was coupled with a deterministic active nerve fibre model based on characteristics of human auditory neurons. The nerve fibres were modelled in three stages of neural degeneration: intact, with shortened peripheral terminal nodes and with complete loss of the peripheral processes. The model simulated neural responses to monophasic, biphasic, triphasic and pseudomonophasic pulses of both polarities. Polarity sensitivity was quantified as the so-called polarity effect (PE), which is defined as the dB difference between cathodic and anodic thresholds. Results showed that anodic pulses mostly excited the auditory neurons in their central axons, while cathodic stimuli generally excited neurons in their peripheral processes or near their cell bodies. As a consequence, cathodic thresholds were more affected by neural degeneration than anodic thresholds. Neural degeneration did not have a consistent effect on the modelled PE values, though there were notable effects of electrode contact insertion angle and distance from the modiolus. Furthermore, determining PE values using charge-balanced multiphasic pulses as approximations of monophasic stimuli produced different results than those obtained with true monophasic pulses, at a degree that depended on the specific pulse shape; in general, pulses with lower secondary phase amplitudes showed polarity sensitivities closer to those obtained with true monophasic pulses. The main conclusion of this study is that polarity sensitivity is not a reliable indicator of neural health; neural degeneration affects simulated polarity sensitivity, but its effect is not consistently related to the degree of degeneration. Polarity sensitivity is not simply a product of the state of the neurons, but also depends on spatial factors.(c) 2021 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ )

Objectives To compare the quality of life (QoL) of children with hearing loss (HL) and children with normal hearing (NH) and to examine how the QoL of children with HL changes over time, considering language skills, type of hearing device, degree of HL, and type of education. Methods and materials This longitudinal study included 62 children with HL and their parents. Developmental outcome data were collected at two time points, when the mean ages of the children were 4 and 11 years. The Pediatric Quality of Life (PedsQL™) questionnaire, which includes assessments of Physical, Emotional, Social, and School functioning, was completed by parents at both time points and by the children with HL at the second time point. Receptive and expressive language skills at 4 years were assessed by the Reynell Developmental Language Scale. Results were compared with a Dutch normative sample. Results The QoL of children with HL was similar to that of children with NH at both time points on two of the four QoL scales, Emotional and Physical functioning. On the other two scales, Social and School functioning, children with HL who attended special education and children who switched to mainstream education showed lower scores than children with HL who were consistently in mainstream education and lower scores than children with NH. The School QoL of children with HL decreased over time, as did the School QoL of children with NH. Social QoL of children with cochlear implants decreased over time, but this was not the case in children with hearing aids. Language skills and the degree of HL did not clinically improve the QoL over time of preschool children with HL. Conclusions The QoL of children with HL in mainstream education and the Physical and Emotional QoL of all children with HL were satisfactory. It is essential to develop specific guidance regarding school activities for children with HL in special education and for children with HL who switch to mainstream education in order to increase their social QoL.

Item does not contain fulltext OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To determine the effect of cochlear implantation on tinnitus perception in patients with severe bilateral postlingual sensorineural hearing loss and to demonstrate possible differences between unilateral and bilateral cochlear implantation. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective study. METHODS: Thirty-eight adult patients were included in this prospective study, as part of a multicenter randomized controlled trial investigating the benefits of bilateral cochlear implantation versus unilateral cochlear implantation. Pre- and postoperative tinnitus perception scores were evaluated, before and 1 year after implantation on three tinnitus questionnaires; the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI), the Tinnitus Questionnaire (TQ), and a visual analogue scale for tinnitus burden. RESULTS: Before implantation, the tinnitus prevalence was 42.1% (16 of 38) in the whole study group. One year after implantation, the tinnitus questionnaire scores had decreased in 71.4% according to the TQ and 80.0% according to the THI. Tinnitus was induced after cochlear implantation in six patients, five in the bilateral and one in the unilateral group. CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that cochlear implantation is effective in the reduction of tinnitus in patients with bilateral sensorineural hearing loss who suffered from preoperative tinnitus. Conversely, tinnitus may also increase or even be induced by the cochlear implantation itself. Cochlear implant candidates should be well informed about these possible consequences before undergoing surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 2b Laryngoscope, 126:956-961, 2016.

Objectives The first aim of this study was to examine various aspects of Theory of Mind (ToM) development in young children with moderate hearing loss (MHL) compared with hearing peers. The second aim was to examine the relation between language abilities and ToM in both groups. The third aim was to compare the sequence of ToM development between children with MHL and hearing peers. Design Forty-four children between 3 and 5 years old with MHL (35 to 70 dB HL) who preferred to use spoken language were identified from a nationwide study on hearing loss in young children. These children were compared with 101 hearing peers. Children were observed during several tasks to measure intention understanding, the acknowledgement of the other's desires, and belief understanding. Parents completed two scales of the child development inventory to assess expressive language and language comprehension in all participants. Objective language test scores were available from the medical files of children with MHL. Results Children with MHL showed comparable levels of intention understanding but lower levels of both desire and belief understanding than hearing peers. Parents reported lower language abilities in children with MHL compared with hearing peers. Yet, the language levels of children with MHL were within the average range compared with test normative samples. A stronger relation between language and ToM was found in the hearing children than in children with MHL. The expected developmental sequence of ToM skills was divergent in approximately one-fourth of children with MHL, when compared with hearing children. Conclusion Children with MHL have more difficulty in their ToM reasoning than hearing peers, despite the fact that their language abilities lie within the average range compared with test normative samples.

Objective Permanent childhood hearing impairment often results in speech and language problems that are already apparent in early childhood. Past studies show a clear link between language skills and the child's social–emotional functioning. The aim of this study was to examine the level of language and communication skills after the introduction of early identification services and their relation with social functioning and behavioral problems in deaf and hard of hearing children. Study Design Nationwide cross-sectional observation of a cohort of 85 early identified deaf and hard of hearing preschool children (aged 30–66 months). Methods Parents reported on their child's communicative abilities (MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventory III), social functioning and appearance of behavioral problems (Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire). Receptive and expressive language skills were measured using the Reynell Developmental Language Scale and the Schlichting Expressive Language Test, derived from the child's medical records. Results Language and communicative abilities of early identified deaf and hard of hearing children are not on a par with hearing peers. Compared to normative scores from hearing children, parents of deaf and hard of hearing children reported lower social functioning and more behavioral problems. Higher communicative abilities were related to better social functioning and less behavioral problems. No relation was found between the degree of hearing loss, age at amplification, uni- or bilateral amplification, mode of communication and social functioning and behavioral problems. Conclusion These results suggest that improving the communicative abilities of deaf and hard of hearing children could improve their social–emotional functioning.

Objectives: Among adult patients with prelingual deafness, interindividual variability in speech perception outcome after cochlear implantation is generally large. It was hypothesized that the intelligibility of the patient's own speech may be predictive of speech perception with a cochlear implant. The objectives were (1) to provide a validation of a new test battery as a measurement tool for intelligibility using a group of prelingually deafened patients; (2) to investigate the validity of the test battery as a predictor of postimplant speech perception, based on preliminary data with a cochlear implant from a subgroup of patients; and (3) to investigate the validity of the test battery as a predictor of postimplant health-related quality of life (HRQoL) for the same subgroup of patients. Design: Twenty-five adult cochlear implant candidates with prelingual deafness participated in this study. Average age at onset of deafness was 8 mos (range 0 to 4 yrs). Speech samples from the participants were recorded and presented to two normal-hearing listeners. Results from the seven intelligibility tests in the battery were subjected to analyses of reliability and validity. Furthermore, the multiple test outcomes were submitted to a Principal Component Analysis to investigate the possibility of summarizing the data. Subsequently, from the group of 25 participants, 9 participants with above-average intelligibility were selected for implantation. Speech perception data with a cochlear implant from the nine implantees were collected at 12 mos postimplantation, as well as HRQoL data. Predictive validity of the intelligibility test battery was determined, using the postimplant data as the criterion. Results: Results from the 25 participants averaged over listeners showed that all tests in the battery had good reliability and validity as measures of intelligibility. Principal Component Analysis showed that the multiple test outcomes could be summarized by a single underlying variable. Despite the early age at onset of deafness, the subgroup of nine participants who received a cochlear implant included several good performers in terms of speech perception with the implant. The intelligibility test battery summary score had good validity as a predictor of postimplant outcome: the more intelligible the participant's speech, the better his or her speech perception outcome with the cochlear implant. Availability of effective auditory input in early life may be the fundamental factor underlying the potential for speech perception with a cochlear implant in later life. The intelligibility test battery can be reduced to a single test to minimize testing time without negatively affecting its predictive validity. Predictive validity of the intelligibility test battery can be generalized to HRQoL outcomes of cochlear implantation, provided these outcomes are concerned with speech processing abilities. Conclusions: The new test battery (or its reduced version), used as a measure of intelligibility, is a promising tool for guiding cochlear implant candidacy decisions and counseling for individual patients with prelingual deafness. Because intelligibility has superior predictive power in comparison to age at onset of deafness, the latter should be discarded as an exclusion criterion for cochlear implantation.

Objectives/Hypothesis: To study to what extent it is possible to achieve identical insertion depths and to maintain the same performance after cochlear reimplantation. Study Design: Outcome research on a retrospective case series in a tertiary university referral center. Methods: Data were collected for 12 adults and three children who underwent reimplantation during the last 3 years with a new HiRes90K device with Hi Focus 1J electrode owing to failure of the feed-through seal. Multislice computed tomography scans were used to compare positions of the original and newly placed electrode arrays. The speech-perception scores on a consonant-vowel-consonant word test before and after reimplantation were compared. Results: All reimplantations were successfully performed by two experienced cochlear implantation surgeons, and no complications were observed. Postoperative imaging showed that the average displacement of the new implant was only 0.59 mm. Reactivation of the implant gave immediate open set speech understanding in all patients, and speech perception rapidly returned to the previous level obtained with the original implant within weeks; it was even significantly better at the 3-month follow-up. No relation was found between changes in performance and the amount of displacement of the electrode array. Conclusions: After cochlear reimplantation with the same device, electrode-array position can be accurately replicated and speech perception can be regained or even improved within weeks.

Introduction: The causes of Permanent Childhood Hearing Impairment (PCHI) are often quoted as being hereditary in 50%, acquired in 25%, and unknown in 25% of cases. Interest in the causes of PCHI has grown recently due to increasing diagnostic possibilities. We investigated the evidence for the reported distribution of these causes. Methods: Population-based study and a systematic review. Inclusion criteria for population-based study: children born between 2003 and 2005, resident in The Netherlands at birth, known at an Audiology Center with PCHI at the age of 3-5 years. The causes of PCHI were determined prospectively by detection of congenital cytomegalovirus on dried blood spots and/or genetic diagnostic investigations in addition to reviewing data from medical records. A systematic review was carried out using three terms (hearing loss, infant, and etiology) and limited to articles published between January 1997 and July 2009. Main outcome measures were: the (weighted) proportions of the various causes of PCHI following diagnostic investigations. Results: In the study-population (n = 185) a hereditary cause was found in 38.9%, acquired cause in 29.7%, miscellaneous cause in 7.1%, and the cause remained unknown in 24.3%. The systematic review of the literature (n = 9 articles) resulted in a weighted mean of 30.4% hereditary, 19.2% acquired, and 48.3% unknown causes of PCHI. Discussion: The systematic review and the results of the population-based study provided little support for the generally accepted distribution of causes of PCHI.

Objectives: To compare the preverbal communication skills of two groups of young implanted children: those with unilateral implantation and those with bilateral implantation. Material and methods: The study assessed 69 children: 42 unilaterally and 27 bilaterally implanted with age at implantation less than 3 years. The preverbal skills of these children were measured before and 1 year after implantation, using Tait Video Analysis that has been found able to predict later speech outcomes in young implanted children. Results: Before implantation there was no significant difference between the unilateral group and the bilateral group. There was still no difference at 12 months following implantation where vocal autonomy is concerned, but a strongly significant difference between the groups for vocal turn-taking and non-looking vocal turns, the bilateral group outperforming the unilateral group. Regarding gestural turn-taking and gestural autonomy, there was a strongly significant difference between the two groups at the 12 month interval, and also a difference before implantation for gestural autonomy, the unilateral group having the higher scores. Multiple regression of non-looking vocal turns revealed that 1 year following implantation, bilateral implantation contributed to 51% of the variance (p < 0.0001), after controlling for the influence of age at implantation and length of deafness which did not reach statistical significance. Conclusions: Profoundly deaf bilaterally implanted children are significantly more likely to use vocalisation to communicate, and to use audition when interacting vocally with an adult, compared with unilaterally implanted children. These results are independent of age at implantation and length of deafness. © 2009.