Author: "Friedrich, O." - Searchworks@Jio Institute Digital Library Search Results

Your search keyword '"Friedrich, O."' showing total 1,256 results

Start Over Author "Friedrich, O."

1,256 results on '"Friedrich, O."'

1. Dark Energy Survey Year 3: Blue Shear

Author: McCullough, J., Amon, A., Legnani, E., Gruen, D., Roodman, A., Friedrich, O., MacCrann, N., Becker, M. R., Myles, J., Dodelson, S., Samuroff, S., Blazek, J., Prat, J., Honscheid, K., Pieres, A., Ferté, A., Alarcon, A., Drlica-Wagner, A., Choi, A., Navarro-Alsina, A., Campos, A., Malagón, A. A. Plazas, Porredon, A., Farahi, A., Ross, A. J., Rosell, A. Carnero, Yin, B., Flaugher, B., Yanny, B., Sánchez, C., Chang, C., Davis, C., To, C., Doux, C., Brooks, D., James, D. J., Cid, D. Sanchez, Hollowood, D. L., Huterer, D., Rykoff, E. S., Gaztanaga, E., Huff, E. M., Suchyta, E., Sheldon, E., Sanchez, E., Tarsitano, F., Andrade-Oliveira, F., Castander, F. J., Bernstein, G. M., Gutierrez, G., Giannini, G., Tarle, G., Diehl, H. T., Huang, H., Harrison, I., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Tutusaus, I., Ferrero, I., Elvin-Poole, J., Marshall, J. L., Muir, J., Weller, J., Zuntz, J., Carretero, J., DeRose, J., Frieman, J., Cordero, J., De Vicente, J., García-Bellido, J., Mena-Fernández, J., Eckert, K., Romer, A. K., Bechtol, K., Herner, K., Kuehn, K., Secco, L. F., da Costa, L. N., Paterno, M., Soares-Santos, 21 M., Gatti, M., Raveri, M., Yamamoto, M., Smith, M., Kind, M. Carrasco, Troxel, M. A., Aguena, M., Jarvis, M., Swanson, M. E. C., Weaverdyck, N., Lahav, O., Doel, P., Wiseman, P., Miquel, R., Gruendl, R. A., Cawthon, R., Allam, S., Hinton, S. R., Bridle, S. L., Bocquet, S., Desai, S., Pandey, S., Everett, S., Lee, S., Shin, T., Palmese, A., Conselice, C., Burke, D. L., Buckley-Geer, E., Lima, M., Vincenzi, M., Pereira, M. E. S., Crocce, M., Schubnell, M., Jeffrey, N., Alves, O., Vikram, V., Zhang, Y., and Collaboration, DES
Subjects: Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Abstract: Modeling the intrinsic alignment (IA) of galaxies poses a challenge to weak lensing analyses. The Dark Energy Survey is expected to be less impacted by IA when limited to blue, star-forming galaxies. The cosmological parameter constraints from this blue cosmic shear sample are stable to IA model choice, unlike passive galaxies in the full DES Y3 sample, the goodness-of-fit is improved and the $\Omega_{m}$ and $S_8$ better agree with the cosmic microwave background. Mitigating IA with sample selection, instead of flexible model choices, can reduce uncertainty in $S_8$ by a factor of 1.5., Comment: Data access available at https://jamiemccullough.github.io/data/blueshear/
Published: 2024

2. Enhancing weak lensing redshift distribution characterization by optimizing the Dark Energy Survey Self-Organizing Map Photo-z method

Author: Campos, A., Yin, B., Dodelson, S., Amon, A., Alarcon, A., Sánchez, C., Bernstein, G. M., Giannini, G., Myles, J., Samuroff, S., Alves, O., Andrade-Oliveira, F., Bechtol, K., Becker, M. R., Blazek, J., Camacho, H., Rosell, A. Carnero, Kind, M. Carrasco, Cawthon, R., Chang, C., Chen, R., Choi, A., Cordero, J., Davis, C., DeRose, J., Diehl, H. T., Doux, C., Drlica-Wagner, A., Eckert, K., Eifler, T. F., Elvin-Poole, J., Everett, S., Fang, X., Ferté, A., Friedrich, O., Gatti, M., Gruen, D., Gruendl, R. A., Harrison, I., Hartley, W. G., Herner, K., Huang, H., Huff, E. M., Jarvis, M., Krause, E., Kuropatkin, N., Leget, P. -F., MacCrann, N., McCullough, J., Navarro-Alsina, A., Pandey, S., Prat, J., Raveri, M., Rollins, R. P., Roodman, A., Rosenfeld, R., Ross, A. J., Rykoff, E. S., Sanchez, J., Secco, L. F., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Sheldon, E., Shin, T., Troxel, M. A., Tutusaus, I., Varga, T. N., Wechsler, R. H., Yanny, B., Zhang, Y., Zuntz, J., Aguena, M., Annis, J., Bacon, D., Bocquet, S., Brooks, D., Burke, D. L., Carretero, J., Castander, F. J., Costanzi, M., da Costa, L. N., De Vicente, J., Doel, P., Ferrero, I., Flaugher, B., Frieman, J., García-Bellido, J., Gaztanaga, E., Gutierrez, G., Hinton, S. R., Hollowood, D. L., Honscheid, K., James, D. J., Kuehn, K., Lima, M., Lin, H., Marshall, J. L., Mena-Fernández, J., Menanteau, F., Miquel, R., Ogando, R. L. C., Paterno, M., Pereira, M. E. S., Pieres, A., Malagón, A. A. Plazas, Porredon, A., Sanchez, E., Cid, D. Sanchez, Smith, M., Suchyta, E., Swanson, M. E. C., Tarle, G., To, C., Vikram, V., and Weaverdyck, N.
Subjects: Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Instrumentation and Methods for Astrophysics
Abstract: Characterization of the redshift distribution of ensembles of galaxies is pivotal for large scale structure cosmological studies. In this work, we focus on improving the Self-Organizing Map (SOM) methodology for photometric redshift estimation (SOMPZ), specifically in anticipation of the Dark Energy Survey Year 6 (DES Y6) data. This data set, featuring deeper and fainter galaxies than DES Year 3 (DES Y3), demands adapted techniques to ensure accurate recovery of the underlying redshift distribution. We investigate three strategies for enhancing the existing SOM-based approach used in DES Y3: 1) Replacing the Y3 SOM algorithm with one tailored for redshift estimation challenges; 2) Incorporating $\textit{g}$-band flux information to refine redshift estimates (i.e. using $\textit{griz}$ fluxes as opposed to only $\textit{riz}$); 3) Augmenting redshift data for galaxies where available. These methods are applied to DES Y3 data, and results are compared to the Y3 fiducial ones. Our analysis indicates significant improvements with the first two strategies, notably reducing the overlap between redshift bins. By combining strategies 1 and 2, we have successfully managed to reduce redshift bin overlap in DES Y3 by up to 66$\%$. Conversely, the third strategy, involving the addition of redshift data for selected galaxies as an additional feature in the method, yields inferior results and is abandoned. Our findings contribute to the advancement of weak lensing redshift characterization and lay the groundwork for better redshift characterization in DES Year 6 and future stage IV surveys, like the Rubin Observatory.
Published: 2024

3. Weak lensing combined with the kinetic Sunyaev Zel'dovich effect: A study of baryonic feedback

Author: Bigwood, L., Amon, A., Schneider, A., Salcido, J., McCarthy, I. G., Preston, C., Sanchez, D., Sijacki, D., Schaan, E., Ferraro, S., Battaglia, N., Chen, A., Dodelson, S., Roodman, A., Pieres, A., Ferte, A., Alarcon, A., Drlica-Wagner, A., Choi, A., Navarro-Alsina, A., Campos, A., Ross, A. J., Rosell, A. Carnero, Yin, B., Yanny, B., Sanchez, C., Chang, C., Davis, C., Doux, C., Gruen, D., Rykoff, E. S., Huff, E. M., Sheldon, E., Tarsitano, F., Andrade-Oliveira, F., Bernstein, G. M., Giannini, G., Diehl, H. T., Huang, H., Harrison, I., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Tutusaus, I., Elvin-Poole, J., McCullough, J., Zuntz, J., Blazek, J., DeRose, J., Cordero, J., Prat, J., Myles, J., Eckert, K., Bechtol, K., Herner, K., Secco, L. F., Gatti, M., Raveri, M., Kind, M. Carrasco, Becker, M. R., Troxel, M. A., Jarvis, M., MacCrann, N., Friedrich, O., Alves, O., Leget, P. -F., Chen, R., Rollins, R. P., Wechsler, R. H., Gruendl, R. A., Cawthon, R., Allam, S., Bridle, S. L., Pandey, S., Everett, S., Shin, T., Hartley, W. G., Fang, X., Zhang, Y., Aguena, M., Annis, J., Bacon, D., Bertin, E., Bocquet, S., Brooks, D., Carretero, J., Castander, F. J., da Costa, L. N., Pereira, M. E. S., De Vicente, J., Desai, S., Doel, P., Ferrero, I., Flaugher, B., Frieman, J., Garcia-Bellido, J., Gaztanaga, E., Gutierrez, G., Hinton, S. R., Hollowood, D. L., Honscheid, K., Huterer, D., James, D. J., Kuehn, K., Lahav, O., Lee, S., Marshall, J. L., Mena-Fernandez, J., Miquel, R., Muir, J., Paterno, M., Malagon, A. A. Plazas, Porredon, A., Romer, A. K., Samuroff, S., Sanchez, E., Cid, D. Sanchez, Smith, M., Soares-Santos, M., Suchyta, E., Swanson, M. E. C., Tarle, G., To, C., Weaverdyck, N., Weller, J., Wiseman, P., and Yamamoto, M.
Subjects: Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies
Abstract: Extracting precise cosmology from weak lensing surveys requires modelling the non-linear matter power spectrum, which is suppressed at small scales due to baryonic feedback processes. However, hydrodynamical galaxy formation simulations make widely varying predictions for the amplitude and extent of this effect. We use measurements of Dark Energy Survey Year 3 weak lensing (WL) and Atacama Cosmology Telescope DR5 kinematic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich (kSZ) to jointly constrain cosmological and astrophysical baryonic feedback parameters using a flexible analytical model, `baryonification'. First, using WL only, we compare the $S_8$ constraints using baryonification to a simulation-calibrated halo model, a simulation-based emulator model and the approach of discarding WL measurements on small angular scales. We find that model flexibility can shift the value of $S_8$ and degrade the uncertainty. The kSZ provides additional constraints on the astrophysical parameters and shifts $S_8$ to $S_8=0.823^{+0.019}_{-0.020}$, a higher value than attained using the WL-only analysis. We measure the suppression of the non-linear matter power spectrum using WL + kSZ and constrain a mean feedback scenario that is more extreme than the predictions from most hydrodynamical simulations. We constrain the baryon fractions and the gas mass fractions and find them to be generally lower than inferred from X-ray observations and simulation predictions. We conclude that the WL + kSZ measurements provide a new and complementary benchmark for building a coherent picture of the impact of gas around galaxies across observations.
Published: 2024

4. DES Y3 + KiDS-1000: Consistent cosmology combining cosmic shear surveys

Author: Survey, Dark Energy, Collaboration, Kilo-Degree Survey, Abbott, T. M. C., Aguena, M., Alarcon, A., Alves, O., Amon, A., Andrade-Oliveira, F., Asgari, M., Avila, S., Bacon, D., Bechtol, K., Becker, M. R., Bernstein, G. M., Bertin, E., Bilicki, M., Blazek, J., Bocquet, S., Brooks, D., Burger, P., Burke, D. L., Camacho, H., Campos, A., Rosell, A. Carnero, Kind, M. Carrasco, Carretero, J., Castander, F. J., Cawthon, R., Chang, C., Chen, R., Choi, A., Conselice, C., Cordero, J., Crocce, M., da Costa, L. N., Pereira, M. E. da Silva, Dalal, R., Davis, C., de Jong, J. T. A., DeRose, J., Desai, S., Diehl, H. T., Dodelson, S., Doel, P., Doux, C., Drlica-Wagner, A., Dvornik, A., Eckert, K., Eifler, T. F., Elvin-Poole, J., Everett, S., Fang, X., Ferrero, I., Ferté, A., Flaugher, B., Friedrich, O., Frieman, J., García-Bellido, J., Gatti, M., Giannini, G., Giblin, B., Gruen, D., Gruendl, R. A., Gutierrez, G., Harrison, I., Hartley, W. G., Herner, K., Heymans, C., Hildebrandt, H., Hinton, S. R., Hoekstra, H., Hollowood, D. L., Honscheid, K., Huang, H., Huff, E. M., Huterer, D., James, D. J., Jarvis, M., Jeffrey, N., Jeltema, T., Joachimi, B., Joudaki, S., Kannawadi, A., Krause, E., Kuehn, K., Kuijken, K., Kuropatkin, N., Lahav, O., Leget, P. -F., Lemos, P., Li, S. -S., Li, X., Liddle, A. R., Lima, M., Lin, C. -A, Lin, H., MacCrann, N., Mahony, C., Marshall, J. L., McCullough, J., Mena-Fernández, J., Menanteau, F., Miquel, R., Mohr, J. J., Muir, J., Myles, J., Napolitano, N., Navarro-Alsina, A., Ogando, R. L. C., Palmese, A., Pandey, S., Park, Y., Paterno, M., Peacock, J. A., Petravick, D., Pieres, A., Malagón, A. A. Plazas, Porredon, A., Prat, J., Radovich, M., Raveri, M., Reischke, R., Robertson, N. C., Rollins, R. P., Romer, A. K., Roodman, A., Rykoff, E. S., Samuroff, S., Sánchez, C., Sanchez, E., Sanchez, J., Schneider, P., Secco, L. F., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Shan, H. -Y., Sheldon, E., Shin, T., Sifón, C., Smith, M., Soares-Santos, M., Stölzner, B., Suchyta, E., Swanson, M. E. C., Tarle, G., Thomas, D., To, C., Troxel, M. A., Tröster, T., Tutusaus, I., Busch, J. L. van den, Varga, T. N., Walker, A. R., Weaverdyck, N., Wechsler, R. H., Weller, J., Wiseman, P., Wright, A. H., Yanny, B., Yin, B., Yoon, M., Zhang, Y., and Zuntz, J.
Subjects: Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Abstract: We present a joint cosmic shear analysis of the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y3) and the Kilo-Degree Survey (KiDS-1000) in a collaborative effort between the two survey teams. We find consistent cosmological parameter constraints between DES Y3 and KiDS-1000 which, when combined in a joint-survey analysis, constrain the parameter $S_8 = \sigma_8 \sqrt{\Omega_{\rm m}/0.3}$ with a mean value of $0.790^{+0.018}_{-0.014}$. The mean marginal is lower than the maximum a posteriori estimate, $S_8=0.801$, owing to skewness in the marginal distribution and projection effects in the multi-dimensional parameter space. Our results are consistent with $S_8$ constraints from observations of the cosmic microwave background by Planck, with agreement at the $1.7\sigma$ level. We use a Hybrid analysis pipeline, defined from a mock survey study quantifying the impact of the different analysis choices originally adopted by each survey team. We review intrinsic alignment models, baryon feedback mitigation strategies, priors, samplers and models of the non-linear matter power spectrum., Comment: 40 pages, 21 figures, 15 tables, accepted Open Journal of Astrophysics. Download the chains from https://des.ncsa.illinois.edu/releases/y3a2/Y3key-joint-des-kids or create your own chains with CosmoSIS using https://github.com/joezuntz/cosmosis-standard-library/blob/main/examples/des-y3_and_kids-1000.ini Watch the core team discuss this analysis at https://cosmologytalks.com/2023/05/26/des-kids
Published: 2023
Full Text: View/download PDF

5. Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: magnification modelling and impact on cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and galaxy–galaxy lensing

Author: Elvin-Poole, J, MacCrann, N, Everett, S, Prat, J, Rykoff, ES, De Vicente, J, Yanny, B, Herner, K, Ferté, A, Di Valentino, E, Choi, A, Burke, DL, Sevilla-Noarbe, I, Alarcon, A, Alves, O, Amon, A, Andrade-Oliveira, F, Baxter, E, Bechtol, K, Becker, MR, Bernstein, GM, Blazek, J, Camacho, H, Campos, A, Rosell, A Carnero, Kind, M Carrasco, Cawthon, R, Chang, C, Chen, R, Cordero, J, Crocce, M, Davis, C, DeRose, J, Diehl, HT, Dodelson, S, Doux, C, Drlica-Wagner, A, Eckert, K, Eifler, TF, Elsner, F, Fang, X, Fosalba, P, Friedrich, O, Gatti, M, Giannini, G, Gruen, D, Gruendl, RA, Harrison, I, Hartley, WG, Huang, H, Huff, EM, Huterer, D, Krause, E, Kuropatkin, N, Leget, P-F, Lemos, P, Liddle, AR, McCullough, J, Muir, J, Myles, J, Navarro-Alsina, A, Pandey, S, Park, Y, Porredon, A, Raveri, M, Rodriguez-Monroy, M, Rollins, RP, Roodman, A, Rosenfeld, R, Ross, AJ, Sánchez, C, Sanchez, J, Secco, LF, Sheldon, E, Shin, T, Troxel, MA, Tutusaus, I, Varga, TN, Weaverdyck, N, Wechsler, RH, Yin, B, Zhang, Y, Zuntz, J, Aguena, M, Avila, S, Bacon, D, Bertin, E, Bocquet, S, Brooks, D, García-Bellido, J, Honscheid, K, Jarvis, M, Li, TS, Mena-Fernández, J, To, C, Wilkinson, RD, and Collaboration, DES
Subjects: Astronomical Sciences, Physical Sciences, cosmology: observations, cosmological parameters, gravitational lensing: weak, large-scale structure of Universe, Astronomical and Space Sciences, Astronomy & Astrophysics, Astronomical sciences, Particle and high energy physics, Space sciences
Abstract: We study the effect of magnification in the Dark Energy Survey Year 3 analysis of galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing, using two different lens samples: a sample of luminous red galaxies, redMaGiC, and a sample with a redshift-dependent magnitude limit, MagLim. We account for the effect of magnification on both the flux and size selection of galaxies, accounting for systematic effects using the Balrog image simulations. We estimate the impact of magnification on the galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing cosmology analysis, finding it to be a significant systematic for the MagLim sample. We show cosmological constraints from the galaxy clustering autocorrelation and galaxy-galaxy lensing signal with different magnifications priors, finding broad consistency in cosmological parameters in ΛCDM and wCDM. However, when magnification bias amplitude is allowed to be free, we find the two-point correlation functions prefer a different amplitude to the fiducial input derived from the image simulations. We validate the magnification analysis by comparing the cross-clustering between lens bins with the prediction from the baseline analysis, which uses only the autocorrelation of the lens bins, indicating that systematics other than magnification may be the cause of the discrepancy. We show that adding the cross-clustering between lens redshift bins to the fit significantly improves the constraints on lens magnification parameters and allows uninformative priors to be used on magnification coefficients, without any loss of constraining power or prior volume concerns.
Published: 2023

6. Non-local contribution from small scales in galaxy-galaxy lensing: Comparison of mitigation schemes

Author: Prat, J., Zacharegkas, G., Park, Y., MacCrann, N., Switzer, E. R., Pandey, S., Chang, C., Blazek, J., Miquel, R., Alarcon, A., Alves, O., Amon, A., Andrade-Oliveira, F., Bechtol, K., Becker, M. R., Bernstein, G. M., Chen, R., Choi, A., Camacho, H., Campos, A., Rosell, A. Carnero, Kind, M. Carrasco, Cawthon, R., Cordero, J., Crocce, M., Davis, C., DeRose, J., Diehl, H. T., Dodelson, S., Doux, C., Drlica-Wagner, A., Eckert, K., Eifler, T. F., Elvin-Poole, J., Everett, S., Fang, X., Ferté, A., Fosalba, P., Friedrich, O., Gatti, M., Giannini, G., Gruen, D., Gruendl, R. A., Harrison, I., Hartley, W. G., Herner, K., Huang, H., Huff, E. M., Jarvis, M., Krause, E., Kuropatkin, N., Leget, P. -F., McCullough, J., Myles, J., Navarro-Alsina, A., Porredon, A., Raveri, M., Rollins, R. P., Roodman, A., Rosenfeld, R., Ross, A. J., Rykoff, E. S., Sánchez, C., Sanchez, J., Secco, L. F., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Sheldon, E., Shin, T., Troxel, M. A., Tutusaus, I., Varga, T. N., Yanny, B., Yin, B., Zhang, Y., Zuntz, J., Aguena, M., Allam, S., Annis, J., Bacon, D., Bertin, E., Bocquet, S., Brooks, D., Burke, D. L., Carretero, J., Costanzi, M., Pereira, M. E. S., De Vicente, J., Desai, S., Ferrero, I., Flaugher, B., Gerdes, D. W., Gutierrez, G., Hinton, S. R., Hollowood, D. L., Honscheid, K., James, D. J., Lima, M., Menanteau, F., Mena-Fernández, J., Palmese, A., Paterno, M., Paz-Chinchón, F., Pieres, A., Malagón, A. A. Plazas, Rodriguez-Monroy, M., Sanchez, E., Schubnell, M., Smith, M., Soares-Santos, M., Suchyta, E., Swanson, M. E. C., Tarle, G., To, C., Weaverdyck, N., and Weller, J.
Subjects: Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Abstract: Recent cosmological analyses with large-scale structure and weak lensing measurements, usually referred to as 3$\times$2pt, had to discard a lot of signal-to-noise from small scales due to our inability to accurately model non-linearities and baryonic effects. Galaxy-galaxy lensing, or the position-shear correlation between lens and source galaxies, is one of the three two-point correlation functions that are included in such analyses, usually estimated with the mean tangential shear. However, tangential shear measurements at a given angular scale $\theta$ or physical scale $R$ carry information from all scales below that, forcing the scale cuts applied in real data to be significantly larger than the scale at which theoretical uncertainties become problematic. Recently there have been a few independent efforts that aim to mitigate the non-locality of the galaxy-galaxy lensing signal. Here we perform a comparison of the different methods, including the Y-transformation, the Point-Mass marginalization methodology and the Annular Differential Surface Density statistic. We do the comparison at the cosmological constraints level in a combined galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing analysis. We find that all the estimators yield equivalent cosmological results assuming a simulated Rubin Observatory Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST) Year 1 like setup and also when applied to DES Y3 data. With the LSST Y1 setup, we find that the mitigation schemes yield $\sim$1.3 times more constraining $S_8$ results than applying larger scale cuts without using any mitigation scheme., Comment: 11+4 pages, 4+4 figures. Matches the accepted version in MNRAS
Published: 2022
Full Text: View/download PDF

7. Non-local contribution from small scales in galaxy–galaxy lensing: comparison of mitigation schemes

Author: Prat, J, Zacharegkas, G, Park, Y, MacCrann, N, Switzer, ER, Pandey, S, Chang, C, Blazek, J, Miquel, R, Alarcon, A, Alves, O, Amon, A, Andrade-Oliveira, F, Bechtol, K, Becker, MR, Bernstein, GM, Chen, R, Choi, A, Camacho, H, Campos, A, Rosell, A Carnero, Kind, M Carrasco, Cawthon, R, Cordero, J, Crocce, M, Davis, C, DeRose, J, Diehl, HT, Dodelson, S, Doux, C, Drlica-Wagner, A, Eckert, K, Eifler, TF, Elvin-Poole, J, Everett, S, Fang, X, Ferté, A, Fosalba, P, Friedrich, O, Gatti, M, Giannini, G, Gruen, D, Gruendl, RA, Harrison, I, Hartley, WG, Herner, K, Huang, H, Huff, EM, Jarvis, M, Krause, E, Kuropatkin, N, Leget, P-F, McCullough, J, Myles, J, Navarro-Alsina, A, Porredon, A, Raveri, M, Rollins, RP, Roodman, A, Rosenfeld, R, Ross, AJ, Rykoff, ES, Sánchez, C, Sanchez, J, Secco, LF, Sevilla-Noarbe, I, Sheldon, E, Shin, T, Troxel, MA, Tutusaus, I, Varga, TN, Yanny, B, Yin, B, Zhang, Y, Zuntz, J, Aguena, M, Allam, S, Annis, J, Bacon, D, Bertin, E, Bocquet, S, Brooks, D, Burke, DL, Carretero, J, Costanzi, M, Pereira, MES, De Vicente, J, Desai, S, Ferrero, I, Flaugher, B, Gerdes, DW, Gutierrez, G, Hinton, SR, Hollowood, DL, Honscheid, K, James, DJ, Lima, M, Menanteau, F, Mena-Fernández, J, and Palmese, A
Subjects: Astronomical Sciences, Physical Sciences, gravitational lensing: weak, cosmological parameters, large-scale structure of Universe, cosmology: theory, Astronomical and Space Sciences, Astronomy & Astrophysics, Astronomical sciences, Particle and high energy physics, Space sciences
Abstract: Recent cosmological analyses with large-scale structure and weak lensing measurements, usually referred to as 3 × 2pt, had to discard a lot of signal to noise from small scales due to our inability to accurately model non-linearities and baryonic effects. Galaxy–galaxy lensing, or the position–shear correlation between lens and source galaxies, is one of the three two-point correlation functions that are included in such analyses, usually estimated with the mean tangential shear. However, tangential shear measurements at a given angular scale θ or physical scale R carry information from all scales below that, forcing the scale cuts applied in real data to be significantly larger than the scale at which theoretical uncertainties become problematic. Recently, there have been a few independent efforts that aim to mitigate the non-locality of the galaxy–galaxy lensing signal. Here, we perform a comparison of the different methods, including the Y-transformation, the point-mass marginalization methodology, and the annular differential surface density statistic. We do the comparison at the cosmological constraints level in a combined galaxy clustering and galaxy–galaxy lensing analysis. We find that all the estimators yield equivalent cosmological results assuming a simulated Rubin Observatory Legacy Survey of Space and Time (LSST) Year 1 like set-up and also when applied to DES Y3 data. With the LSST Y1 set-up, we find that the mitigation schemes yield ∼1.3 times more constraining S8 results than applying larger scale cuts without using any mitigation scheme.
Published: 2023

8. Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Magnification modeling and impact on cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing

Author: Elvin-Poole, J., MacCrann, N., Everett, S., Prat, J., Rykoff, E. S., De Vicente, J., Yanny, B., Herner, K., Ferté, A., Di Valentino, E., Choi, A., Burke, D. L., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Alarcon, A., Alves, O., Amon, A., Andrade-Oliveira, F., Baxter, E., Bechtol, K., Becker, M. R., Bernstein, G. M., Blazek, J., Camacho, H., Campos, A., Rosell, A. Carnero, Kind, M. Carrasco, Cawthon, R., Chang, C., Chen, R., Cordero, J., Crocce, M., Davis, C., DeRose, J., Diehl, H. T., Dodelson, S., Doux, C., Drlica-Wagner, A., Eckert, K., Eifler, T. F., Elsner, F., Fang, X., Fosalba, P., Friedrich, O., Gatti, M., Giannini, G., Gruen, D., Gruendl, R. A., Harrison, I., Hartley, W. G., Huang, H., Huff, E. M., Huterer, D., Krause, E., Kuropatkin, N., Leget, P. -F., Lemos, P., Liddle, A. R., McCullough, J., Muir, J., Myles, J., Navarro-Alsina, A., Pandey, S., Park, Y., Porredon, A., Raveri, M., Rodriguez-Monroy, M., Rollins, R. P., Roodman, A., Rosenfeld, R., Ross, A. J., Sánchez, C., Sanchez, J., Secco, L. F., Sheldon, E., Shin, T., Troxel, M. A., Tutusaus, I., Varga, T. N., Weaverdyck, N., Wechsler, R. H., Yin, B., Zhang, Y., Zuntz, J., Aguena, M., Avila, S., Bacon, D., Bertin, E., Bocquet, S., Brooks, D., García-Bellido, J., Honscheid, K., Jarvis, M., Li, T. S., Mena-Fernández, J., To, C., and Wilkinson, R. D.
Subjects: Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Abstract: We study the effect of magnification in the Dark Energy Survey Year 3 analysis of galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing, using two different lens samples: a sample of Luminous red galaxies, redMaGiC, and a sample with a redshift-dependent magnitude limit, MagLim. We account for the effect of magnification on both the flux and size selection of galaxies, accounting for systematic effects using the Balrog image simulations. We estimate the impact of magnification on the galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing cosmology analysis, finding it to be a significant systematic for the MagLim sample. We show cosmological constraints from the galaxy clustering auto-correlation and galaxy-galaxy lensing signal with different magnifications priors, finding broad consistency in cosmological parameters in $\Lambda$CDM and $w$CDM. However, when magnification bias amplitude is allowed to be free, we find the two-point correlations functions prefer a different amplitude to the fiducial input derived from the image simulations. We validate the magnification analysis by comparing the cross-clustering between lens bins with the prediction from the baseline analysis, which uses only the auto-correlation of the lens bins, indicating systematics other than magnification may be the cause of the discrepancy. We show adding the cross-clustering between lens redshift bins to the fit significantly improves the constraints on lens magnification parameters and allows uninformative priors to be used on magnification coefficients, without any loss of constraining power or prior volume concerns., Comment: Version accepted for publication in MNRAS. 21 pages, 13 figures, See this https://www.darkenergysurvey.org/des-year-3-cosmology-results-papers/ URL for the full DES Y3 cosmology release
Published: 2022
Full Text: View/download PDF

9. Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Redshift Calibration of the MagLim Lens Sample from the combination of SOMPZ and clustering and its impact on Cosmology

Author: Giannini, G., Alarcon, A., Gatti, M., Porredon, A., Crocce, M., Bernstein, G. M., Cawthon, R., Sánchez, C., Doux, C., Elvin-Poole, J., Raveri, M., Myles, J., Amon, A., Allam, S., Alves, O., Andrade-Oliveira, F., Baxter, E., Bechtol, K., Becker, M. R., Blazek, J., Camacho, H., Campos, A., Rosell, A. Carnero, Kind, M. Carrasco, Choi, A., Cordero, J., De Vicente, J., DeRose, J., Diehl, H. T., Dodelson, S., Drlica-Wagner, A., Eckert, K., Everett, S., Fang, X., Farahi, A., Fosalba, P., Friedrich, O., Gruen, D., Gruendl, R. A., Gschwend, J., Harrison, I., Hartley, W. G., Huff, E. M., Jarvis, M., Krause, E., Kuropatkin, N., Lemos, P., MacCrann, N., McCullough, J., Muir, J., Pandey, S., Prat, J., Rodriguez-Monroy, M., Ross, A. J., Rykoff, E. S., Samuroff, S., Secco, L. F., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Sheldon, E., Troxel, M. A., Tucker, D. L., Weaverdyck, N., Yanny, B., Yin, B., Zhang, Y., Abbott, T. M. C., Aguena, M., Bacon, D., Bertin, E., Bocquet, S., Brooks, D., Burke, D. L., Carretero, J., Castander, F. J., Costanzi, M., da Costa, L. N., Pereira, M. E. S., Desai, S., Doel, P., Ferrero, I., Flaugher, B., Friedel, D., Frieman, J., García-Bellido, J., Gerdes, D. W., Gutierrez, G., Hinton, S. R., Hollowood, D. L., Honscheid, K., James, D. J., Kent, S., Kuehn, K., Lahav, O., Lidman, C., Lima, M., Melchior, P., Mena-Fernández, J., Menanteau, F., Miquel, R., Ogando, R. L. C., Paterno, M., Paz-Chinchón, F., Pieres, A., Malagón, A. A. Plazas, Roodman, A., Sanchez, E., Scarpine, V., Smith, M., Suchyta, E., Swanson, M. E. C., Tarle, G., Thomas, D., To, C., and Vincenzi, M.
Subjects: Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Abstract: We present an alternative calibration of the MagLim lens sample redshift distributions from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) first three years of data (Y3). The new calibration is based on a combination of a Self-Organising Maps based scheme and clustering redshifts to estimate redshift distributions and inherent uncertainties, which is expected to be more accurate than the original DES Y3 redshift calibration of the lens sample. We describe in detail the methodology, we validate it on simulations and discuss the main effects dominating our error budget. The new calibration is in fair agreement with the fiducial DES Y3 redshift distributions calibration, with only mild differences ($<3\sigma$) in the means and widths of the distributions. We study the impact of this new calibration on cosmological constraints, analysing DES Y3 galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing measurements, assuming a $\Lambda$CDM cosmology. We obtain $\Omega_{\rm m} = 0.30\pm 0.04$, $\sigma_8 = 0.81\pm 0.07 $ and $S_8 = 0.81\pm 0.04$, which implies a $\sim 0.4\sigma$ shift in the $\Omega_{\rm}-S_8$ plane compared to the fiducial DES Y3 results, highlighting the importance of the redshift calibration of the lens sample in multi-probe cosmological analyses.
Published: 2022
Full Text: View/download PDF

10. Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Constraints on extensions to $\Lambda$CDM with weak lensing and galaxy clustering

Author: DES Collaboration, Abbott, T. M. C., Aguena, M., Alarcon, A., Alves, O., Amon, A., Annis, J., Avila, S., Bacon, D., Baxter, E., Bechtol, K., Becker, M. R., Bernstein, G. M., Birrer, S., Blazek, J., Bocquet, S., Brandao-Souza, A., Bridle, S. L., Brooks, D., Burke, D. L., Camacho, H., Campos, A., Rosell, A. Carnero, Kind, M. Carrasco, Carretero, J., Castander, F. J., Cawthon, R., Chang, C., Chen, A., Chen, R., Choi, A., Conselice, C., Cordero, J., Costanzi, M., Crocce, M., da Costa, L. N., Pereira, M. E. S., Davis, C., Davis, T. M., DeRose, J., Desai, S., Di Valentino, E., Diehl, H. T., Dodelson, S., Doel, P., Doux, C., Drlica-Wagner, A., Eckert, K., Eifler, T. F., Elsner, F., Elvin-Poole, J., Everett, S., Fang, X., Farahi, A., Ferrero, I., Ferté, A., Flaugher, B., Fosalba, P., Friedel, D., Friedrich, O., Frieman, J., García-Bellido, J., Gatti, M., Giani, L., Giannantonio, T., Giannini, G., Gruen, D., Gruendl, R. A., Gschwend, J., Gutierrez, G., Hamaus, N., Harrison, I., Hartley, W. G., Herner, K., Hinton, S. R., Hollowood, D. L., Honscheid, K., Huang, H., Huff, E. M., Huterer, D., Jain, B., James, D. J., Jarvis, M., Jeffrey, N., Jeltema, T., Kovacs, A., Krause, E., Kuehn, K., Kuropatkin, N., Lahav, O., Lee, S., Leget, P. -F., Lemos, P., Leonard, C. D., Liddle, A. R., Lima, M., Lin, H., MacCrann, N., Marshall, J. L., McCullough, J., Mena-Fernández, J., Menanteau, F., Miquel, R., Miranda, V., Mohr, J. J., Muir, J., Myles, J., Nadathur, S., Navarro-Alsina, A., Nichol, R. C., Ogando, R. L. C., Omori, Y., Palmese, A., Pandey, S., Park, Y., Paterno, M., Paz-Chinchón, F., Percival, W. J., Pieres, A., Malagón, A. A. Plazas, Porredon, A., Prat, J., Raveri, M., Rodriguez-Monroy, M., Rogozenski, P., Rollins, R. P., Romer, A. K., Roodman, A., Rosenfeld, R., Ross, A. J., Rykoff, E. S., Samuroff, S., Sánchez, C., Sanchez, E., Sanchez, J., Cid, D. Sanchez, Scarpine, V., Scolnic, D., Secco, L. F., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Sheldon, E., Shin, T., Smith, M., Soares-Santos, M., Suchyta, E., Tabbutt, M., Tarle, G., Thomas, D., To, C., Troja, A., Troxel, M. A., Tutusaus, I., Varga, T. N., Vincenzi, M., Walker, A. R., Weaverdyck, N., Wechsler, R. H., Weller, J., Yanny, B., Yin, B., Zhang, Y., and Zuntz, J.
Subjects: Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Abstract: We constrain extensions to the $\Lambda$CDM model using measurements from the Dark Energy Survey's first three years of observations and external data. The DES data are the two-point correlation functions of weak gravitational lensing, galaxy clustering, and their cross-correlation. We use simulated data and blind analyses of real data to validate the robustness of our results. In many cases, constraining power is limited by the absence of nonlinear predictions that are reliable at our required precision. The models are: dark energy with a time-dependent equation of state, non-zero spatial curvature, sterile neutrinos, modifications of gravitational physics, and a binned $\sigma_8(z)$ model which serves as a probe of structure growth. For the time-varying dark energy equation of state evaluated at the pivot redshift we find $(w_{\rm p}, w_a)= (-0.99^{+0.28}_{-0.17},-0.9\pm 1.2)$ at 68% confidence with $z_{\rm p}=0.24$ from the DES measurements alone, and $(w_{\rm p}, w_a)= (-1.03^{+0.04}_{-0.03},-0.4^{+0.4}_{-0.3})$ with $z_{\rm p}=0.21$ for the combination of all data considered. Curvature constraints of $\Omega_k=0.0009\pm 0.0017$ and effective relativistic species $N_{\rm eff}=3.10^{+0.15}_{-0.16}$ are dominated by external data. For massive sterile neutrinos, we improve the upper bound on the mass $m_{\rm eff}$ by a factor of three compared to previous analyses, giving 95% limits of $(\Delta N_{\rm eff},m_{\rm eff})\leq (0.28, 0.20\, {\rm eV})$. We also constrain changes to the lensing and Poisson equations controlled by functions $\Sigma(k,z) = \Sigma_0 \Omega_{\Lambda}(z)/\Omega_{\Lambda,0}$ and $\mu(k,z)=\mu_0 \Omega_{\Lambda}(z)/\Omega_{\Lambda,0}$ respectively to $\Sigma_0=0.6^{+0.4}_{-0.5}$ from DES alone and $(\Sigma_0,\mu_0)=(0.04\pm 0.05,0.08^{+0.21}_{-0.19})$ for the combination of all data. Overall, we find no significant evidence for physics beyond $\Lambda$CDM., Comment: Updated to match published version and fix a citation reference. 46 pages, 25 figures, data available at https://dev.des.ncsa.illinois.edu/releases/y3a2/Y3key-extensions
Published: 2022
Full Text: View/download PDF

11. Joint analysis of DES Year 3 data and CMB lensing from SPT and Planck III: Combined cosmological constraints

Author: Abbott, T. M. C., Aguena, M., Alarcon, A., Alves, O., Amon, A., Andrade-Oliveira, F., Annis, J., Ansarinejad, B., Avila, S., Bacon, D., Baxter, E. J., Bechtol, K., Becker, M. R., Benson, B. A., Bernstein, G. M., Bertin, E., Blazek, J., Bleem, L. E., Bocquet, S., Brooks, D., Buckley-Geer, E., Burke, D. L., Camacho, H., Campos, A., Carlstrom, J. E., Rosell, A. Carnero, Kind, M. Carrasco, Carretero, J., Cawthon, R., Chang, C., Chang, C. L., Chen, R., Choi, A., Chown, R., Conselice, C., Cordero, J., Costanzi, M., Crawford, T., Crites, A. T., Crocce, M., da Costa, L. N., Davis, C., Davis, T. M., de Haan, T., De Vicente, J., DeRose, J., Desai, S., Diehl, H. T., Dobbs, M. A., Dodelson, S., Doel, P., Doux, C., Drlica-Wagner, A., Eckert, K., Eifler, T. F., Elsner, F., Elvin-Poole, J., Everett, S., Everett, W., Fang, X., Ferrero, I., Ferté, A., Flaugher, B., Fosalba, P., Friedrich, O., Frieman, J., García-Bellido, J., Gatti, M., George, E. M., Giannantonio, T., Giannini, G., Gruen, D., Gruendl, R. A., Gschwend, J., Gutierrez, G., Halverson, N. W., Harrison, I., Herner, K., Hinton, S. R., Holder, G. P., Hollowood, D. L., Holzapfel, W. L., Honscheid, K., Hrubes, J. D., Huang, H., Huff, E. M., Huterer, D., Jain, B., James, D. J., Jarvis, M., Jeltema, T., Kent, S., Knox, L., Kovacs, A., Krause, E., Kuehn, K., Kuropatkin, N., Lahav, O., Lee, A. T., Leget, P. -F., Lemos, P., Liddle, A. R., Lidman, C., Luong-Van, D., McMahon, J. J., MacCrann, N., March, M., Marshall, J. L., Martini, P., McCullough, J., Melchior, P., Menanteau, F., Meyer, S. S., Miquel, R., Mocanu, L., Mohr, J. J., Morgan, R., Muir, J., Myles, J., Natoli, T., Navarro-Alsina, A., Nichol, R. C., Omori, Y., Padin, S., Pandey, S., Park, Y., Paz-Chinchón, F., Pereira, M. E. S., Pieres, A., Malagón, A. A. Plazas, Porredon, A., Prat, J., Pryke, C., Raveri, M., Reichardt, C. L., Rollins, R. P., Romer, A. K., Roodman, A., Rosenfeld, R., Ross, A. J., Ruhl, J. E., Rykoff, E. S., Sánchez, C., Sanchez, E., Sanchez, J., Schaffer, K. K., Secco, L. F., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Sheldon, E., Shin, T., Shirokoff, E., Smith, M., Staniszewski, Z., Stark, A. A., Suchyta, E., Swanson, M. E. C., Tarle, G., To, C., Troxel, M. A., Tutusaus, I., Varga, T. N., Vieira, J. D., Weaverdyck, N., Wechsler, R. H., Weller, J., Williamson, R., Wu, W. L. K., Yanny, B., Yin, B., Zhang, Y., and Zuntz, J.
Subjects: Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Abstract: We present cosmological constraints from the analysis of two-point correlation functions between galaxy positions and galaxy lensing measured in Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 3 data and measurements of cosmic microwave background (CMB) lensing from the South Pole Telescope (SPT) and Planck. When jointly analyzing the DES-only two-point functions and the DES cross-correlations with SPT+Planck CMB lensing, we find $\Omega_{\rm m} = 0.344\pm 0.030$ and $S_8 \equiv \sigma_8 (\Omega_{\rm m}/0.3)^{0.5} = 0.773\pm 0.016$, assuming $\Lambda$CDM. When additionally combining with measurements of the CMB lensing autospectrum, we find $\Omega_{\rm m} = 0.306^{+0.018}_{-0.021}$ and $S_8 = 0.792\pm 0.012$. The high signal-to-noise of the CMB lensing cross-correlations enables several powerful consistency tests of these results, including comparisons with constraints derived from cross-correlations only, and comparisons designed to test the robustness of the galaxy lensing and clustering measurements from DES. Applying these tests to our measurements, we find no evidence of significant biases in the baseline cosmological constraints from the DES-only analyses or from the joint analyses with CMB lensing cross-correlations. However, the CMB lensing cross-correlations suggest possible problems with the correlation function measurements using alternative lens galaxy samples, in particular the redMaGiC galaxies and high-redshift MagLim galaxies, consistent with the findings of previous studies. We use the CMB lensing cross-correlations to identify directions for further investigating these problems., Comment: 20 pages, 15 figures
Published: 2022
Full Text: View/download PDF

12. Constraining the Baryonic Feedback with Cosmic Shear Using the DES Year-3 Small-Scale Measurements

Author: Chen, A., Aricò, G., Huterer, D., Angulo, R., Weaverdyck, N., Friedrich, O., Secco, L. F., Hernández-Monteagudo, C., Alarcon, A., Alves, O., Amon, A., Andrade-Oliveira, F., Baxter, E., Bechtol, K., Becker, M. R., Bernstein, G. M., Blazek, J., Brandao-Souza, A., Bridle, S. L., Camacho, H., Campos, A., Rosell, A. Carnero, Kind, M. Carrasco, Cawthon, R., Chang, C., Chen, R., Chintalapati, P., Choi, A., Cordero, J., Crocce, M., Pereira, M. E. S., Davis, C., DeRose, J., Di Valentino, E., Diehl, H. T., Dodelson, S., Doux, C., Drlica-Wagner, A., Eckert, K., Eifler, T. F., Elsner, F., Elvin-Poole, J., Everett, S., Fang, X., Ferté, A., Fosalba, P., Gatti, M., Gaztanaga, E., Giannini, G., Gruen, D., Gruendl, R. A., Harrison, I., Hartley, W. G., Herner, K., Hoffmann, K., Huang, H., Huff, E. M., Jain, B., Jarvis, M., Jeffrey, N., Kacprzak, T., Krause, E., Kuropatkin, N., Leget, P. -F., Lemos, P., Liddle, A. R., MacCrann, N., McCullough, J., Muir, J., Myles, J., Navarro-Alsina, A., Omori, Y., Pandey, S., Park, Y., Porredon, A., Prat, J., Raveri, M., Refregier, A., Rollins, R. P., Roodman, A., Rosenfeld, R., Ross, A. J., Rykoff, E. S., Samuroff, S., Sánchez, C., Sanchez, J., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Sheldon, E., Shin, T., Troja, A., Troxel, M. A., Tutusaus, I., Varga, T. N., Wechsler, R. H., Yanny, B., Yin, B., Zhang, Y., Zuntz, J., Aguena, M., Annis, J., Bacon, D., Bertin, E., Bocquet, S., Brooks, D., Burke, D. L., Carretero, J., Conselice, C., Costanzi, M., da Costa, L. N., De Vicente, J., Desai, S., Doel, P., Ferrero, I., Flaugher, B., Frieman, J., García-Bellido, J., Gerdes, D. W., Giannantonio, T., Gschwend, J., Gutierrez, G., Hinton, S. R., Hollowood, D. L., Honscheid, K., James, D. J., Kuehn, K., Lahav, O., March, M., Marshall, J. L., Melchior, P., Menanteau, F., Miquel, R., Mohr, J. J., Morgan, R., Paz-Chinchón, F., Pieres, A., Sanchez, E., Smith, M., Suchyta, E., Swanson, M. E. C., Tarle, G., Thomas, D., and To, C.
Subjects: Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Abstract: We use the small scales of the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year-3 cosmic shear measurements, which are excluded from the DES Year-3 cosmological analysis, to constrain the baryonic feedback. To model the baryonic feedback, we adopt a baryonic correction model and use the numerical package \texttt{Baccoemu} to accelerate the evaluation of the baryonic nonlinear matter power spectrum. We design our analysis pipeline to focus on the constraints of the baryonic suppression effects, utilizing the implication given by a principal component analysis on the Fisher forecasts. Our constraint on the baryonic effects can then be used to better model and ameliorate the effects of baryons in producing cosmological constraints from the next generation large-scale structure surveys. We detect the baryonic suppression on the cosmic shear measurements with a $\sim 2 \sigma$ significance. The characteristic halo mass for which half of the gas is ejected by baryonic feedback is constrained to be $M_c > 10^{13.2} h^{-1} M_{\odot}$ (95\% C.L.). The best-fit baryonic suppression is $\sim 5\%$ at $k=1.0 {\rm Mpc}\ h^{-1}$ and $\sim 15\%$ at $k=5.0 {\rm Mpc} \ h^{-1}$. Our findings are robust with respect to the assumptions about the cosmological parameters, specifics of the baryonic model, and intrinsic alignments., Comment: 20 pages, 10 figures. DES Collaboration, Year-3 analysis
Published: 2022
Full Text: View/download PDF

13. Joint analysis of DES Year 3 data and CMB lensing from SPT and Planck II: Cross-correlation measurements and cosmological constraints

Author: Chang, C., Omori, Y., Baxter, E. J., Doux, C., Choi, A., Pandey, S., Alarcon, A., Alves, O., Amon, A., Andrade-Oliveira, F., Bechtol, K., Becker, M. R., Bernstein, G. M., Bianchini, F., Blazek, J., Bleem, L. E., Camacho, H., Campos, A., Rosell, A. Carnero, Kind, M. Carrasco, Cawthon, R., Chen, R., Cordero, J., Crawford, T. M., Crocce, M., Davis, C., DeRose, J., Dodelson, S., Drlica-Wagner, A., Eckert, K., Eifler, T. F., Elsner, F., Elvin-Poole, J., Everett, S., Fang, X., Ferté, A., Fosalba, P., Friedrich, O., Gatti, M., Giannini, G., Gruen, D., Gruendl, R. A., Harrison, I., Herner, K., Huang, H., Huff, E. M., Huterer, D., Jarvis, M., Kovacs, A., Krause, E., Kuropatkin, N., Leget, P. -F., Lemos, P., Liddle, A. R., MacCrann, N., McCullough, J., Muir, J., Myles, J., Navarro-Alsina, A., Park, Y., Porredon, A., Prat, J., Raveri, M., Rollins, R. P., Roodman, A., Rosenfeld, R., Ross, A. J., Rykoff, E. S., Sánchez, C., Sanchez, J., Secco, L. F., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Sheldon, E., Shin, T., Troxel, M. A., Tutusaus, I., Varga, T. N., Weaverdyck, N., Wechsler, R. H., Wu, W. L. K., Yanny, B., Yin, B., Zhang, Y., Zuntz, J., Abbott, T. M. C., Aguena, M., Allam, S., Annis, J., Bacon, D., Benson, B. A., Bertin, E., Bocquet, S., Brooks, D., Burke, D. L., Carlstrom, J. E., Carretero, J., Chang, C. L., Chown, R., Costanzi, M., da Costa, L. N., Crites, A. T., Pereira, M. E. S., de Haan, T., De Vicente, J., Desai, S., Diehl, H. T., Dobbs, M. A., Doel, P., Everett, W., Ferrero, I., Flaugher, B., Friedel, D., Frieman, J., García-Bellido, J., Gaztanaga, E., George, E. M., Giannantonio, T., Halverson, N. W., Hinton, S. R., Holder, G. P., Hollowood, D. L., Holzapfel, W. L., Honscheid, K., Hrubes, J. D., James, D. J., Knox, L., Kuehn, K., Lahav, O., Lee, A. T., Lima, M., Luong-Van, D., March, M., McMahon, J. J., Melchior, P., Menanteau, F., Meyer, S. S., Miquel, R., Mocanu, L., Mohr, J. J., Morgan, R., Natoli, T., Padin, S., Palmese, A., Paz-Chinchón, F., Pieres, A., Malagón, A. A. Plazas, Pryke, C., Reichardt, C. L., Rodríguez-Monroy, M., Romer, A. K., Ruhl, J. E., Sanchez, E., Schaffer, K. K., Schubnell, M., Serrano, S., Shirokoff, E., Smith, M., Staniszewski, Z., Stark, A. A., Suchyta, E., Tarle, G., Thomas, D., To, C., Vieira, J. D., Weller, J., and Williamson, R.
Subjects: Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Abstract: Cross-correlations of galaxy positions and galaxy shears with maps of gravitational lensing of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) are sensitive to the distribution of large-scale structure in the Universe. Such cross-correlations are also expected to be immune to some of the systematic effects that complicate correlation measurements internal to galaxy surveys. We present measurements and modeling of the cross-correlations between galaxy positions and galaxy lensing measured in the first three years of data from the Dark Energy Survey with CMB lensing maps derived from a combination of data from the 2500 deg$^2$ SPT-SZ survey conducted with the South Pole Telescope and full-sky data from the Planck satellite. The CMB lensing maps used in this analysis have been constructed in a way that minimizes biases from the thermal Sunyaev Zel'dovich effect, making them well suited for cross-correlation studies. The total signal-to-noise of the cross-correlation measurements is 23.9 (25.7) when using a choice of angular scales optimized for a linear (nonlinear) galaxy bias model. We use the cross-correlation measurements to obtain constraints on cosmological parameters. For our fiducial galaxy sample, which consist of four bins of magnitude-selected galaxies, we find constraints of $\Omega_{m} = 0.272^{+0.032}_{-0.052}$ and $S_{8} \equiv \sigma_8 \sqrt{\Omega_{m}/0.3}= 0.736^{+0.032}_{-0.028}$ ($\Omega_{m} = 0.245^{+0.026}_{-0.044}$ and $S_{8} = 0.734^{+0.035}_{-0.028}$) when assuming linear (nonlinear) galaxy bias in our modeling. Considering only the cross-correlation of galaxy shear with CMB lensing, we find $\Omega_{m} = 0.270^{+0.043}_{-0.061}$ and $S_{8} = 0.740^{+0.034}_{-0.029}$. Our constraints on $S_8$ are consistent with recent cosmic shear measurements, but lower than the values preferred by primary CMB measurements from Planck., Comment: 25 pages, 19 figures, submitted to PRD
Published: 2022
Full Text: View/download PDF

14. Joint analysis of DES Year 3 data and CMB lensing from SPT and Planck I: Construction of CMB Lensing Maps and Modeling Choices

Author: Omori, Y., Baxter, E. J., Chang, C., Friedrich, O., Alarcon, A., Alves, O., Amon, A., Andrade-Oliveira, F., Bechtol, K., Becker, M. R., Bernstein, G. M., Blazek, J., Bleem, L. E., Camacho, H., Campos, A., Rosell, A. Carnero, Kind, M. Carrasco, Cawthon, R., Chen, R., Choi, A., Cordero, J., Crawford, T. M., Crocce, M., Davis, C., DeRose, J., Dodelson, S., Doux, C., Drlica-Wagner, A., Eckert, K., Eifler, T. F., Elsner, F., Elvin-Poole, J., Everett, S., Fang, X., Ferté, A., Fosalba, P., Gatti, M., Giannini, G., Gruen, D., Gruendl, R. A., Harrison, I., Herner, K., Huang, H., Huff, E. M., Huterer, D., Jarvis, M., Krause, E., Kuropatkin, N., Leget, P. -F., Lemos, P., Liddle, A. R., MacCrann, N., McCullough, J., Muir, J., Myles, J., Navarro-Alsina, A., Pandey, S., Park, Y., Porredon, A., Prat, J., Raveri, M., Rollins, R. P., Roodman, A., Rosenfeld, R., Ross, A. J., Rykoff, E. S., Sánchez, C., Sanchez, J., Secco, L. F., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Sheldon, E., Shin, T., Troxel, M. A., Tutusaus, I., Varga, T. N., Weaverdyck, N., Wechsler, R. H., Wu, W. L. K., Yanny, B., Yin, B., Zhang, Y., Zuntz, J., Abbott, T. M. C., Aguena, M., Allam, S., Annis, J., Bacon, D., Benson, B. A., Bertin, E., Bocquet, S., Brooks, D., Burke, D. L., Carlstrom, J. E., Carretero, J., Chang, C. L., Chown, R., Costanzi, M., da Costa, L. N., Crites, A. T., Pereira, M. E. S., de Haan, T., De Vicente, J., Desai, S., Diehl, H. T., Dobbs, M. A., Doel, P., Everett, W., Ferrero, I., Flaugher, B., Friedel, D., Frieman, J., García-Bellido, J., Gaztanaga, E., George, E. M., Giannantonio, T., Halverson, N. W., Hinton, S. R., Holder, G. P., Hollowood, D. L., Holzapfel, W. L., Honscheid, K., Hrubes, J. D., James, D. J., Knox, L., Kuehn, K., Lahav, O., Lee, A. T., Lima, M., Luong-Van, D., March, M., McMahon, J. J., Melchior, P., Menanteau, F., Meyer, S. S., Miquel, R., Mocanu, L., Mohr, J. J., Morgan, R., Natoli, T., Padin, S., Palmese, A., Paz-Chinchón, F., Pieres, A., Malagón, A. A. Plazas, Pryke, C., Reichardt, C. L., Romer, A. K., Ruhl, J. E., Sanchez, E., Schaffer, K. K., Schubnell, M., Serrano, S., Shirokoff, E., Smith, M., Staniszewski, Z., Stark, A. A., Suchyta, E., Tarle, G., Thomas, D., To, C., Vieira, J. D., Weller, J., and Williamson, R.
Subjects: Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Abstract: Joint analyses of cross-correlations between measurements of galaxy positions, galaxy lensing, and lensing of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) offer powerful constraints on the large-scale structure of the Universe. In a forthcoming analysis, we will present cosmological constraints from the analysis of such cross-correlations measured using Year 3 data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES), and CMB data from the South Pole Telescope (SPT) and Planck. Here we present two key ingredients of this analysis: (1) an improved CMB lensing map in the SPT-SZ survey footprint, and (2) the analysis methodology that will be used to extract cosmological information from the cross-correlation measurements. Relative to previous lensing maps made from the same CMB observations, we have implemented techniques to remove contamination from the thermal Sunyaev Zel'dovich effect, enabling the extraction of cosmological information from smaller angular scales of the cross-correlation measurements than in previous analyses with DES Year 1 data. We describe our model for the cross-correlations between these maps and DES data, and validate our modeling choices to demonstrate the robustness of our analysis. We then forecast the expected cosmological constraints from the galaxy survey-CMB lensing auto and cross-correlations. We find that the galaxy-CMB lensing and galaxy shear-CMB lensing correlations will on their own provide a constraint on $S_8=\sigma_8 \sqrt{\Omega_{\rm m}/0.3}$ at the few percent level, providing a powerful consistency check for the DES-only constraints. We explore scenarios where external priors on shear calibration are removed, finding that the joint analysis of CMB lensing cross-correlations can provide constraints on the shear calibration amplitude at the 5 to 10% level., Comment: 30 pages, 20 figures, To be submitted to PRD
Published: 2022
Full Text: View/download PDF

15. Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: cosmological constraints from the analysis of cosmic shear in harmonic space

Author: Doux, C., Jain, B., Zeurcher, D., Lee, J., Fang, X., Rosenfeld, R., Amon, A., Camacho, H., Choi, A., Secco, L. F., Blazek, J., Chang, C., Gatti, M., Gaztanaga, E., Jeffrey, N., Raveri, M., Samuroff, S., Alarcon, A., Alves, O., Andrade-Oliveira, F., Baxter, E., Bechtol, K., Becker, M. R., Bernstein, G. M., Campos, A., Rosell, A. Carnero, Kind, M. Carrasco, Cawthon, R., Chen, R., Cordero, J., Crocce, M., Davis, C., DeRose, J., Dodelson, S., Drlica-Wagner, A., Eckert, K., Eifler, T. F., Elsner, F., Elvin-Poole, J., Everett, S., Ferté, A., Fosalba, P., Friedrich, O., Giannini, G., Gruen, D., Gruendl, R. A., Harrison, I., Hartley, W. G., Herner, K., Huang, H., Huff, E. M., Huterer, D., Jarvis, M., Krause, E., Kuropatkin, N., Leget, P. -F., Lemos, P., Liddle, A. R., MacCrann, N., McCullough, J., Muir, J., Myles, J., Navarro-Alsina, A., Pandey, S., Park, Y., Porredon, A., Prat, J., Rodriguez-Monroy, M., Rollins, R. P., Roodman, A., Ross, A. J., Rykoff, E. S., Sánchez, C., Sanchez, J., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Sheldon, E., Shin, T., Troja, A., Troxel, M. A., Tutusaus, I., Varga, T. N., Weaverdyck, N., Wechsler, R. H., Yanny, B., Yin, B., Zhang, Y., Zuntz, J., Abbott, T. M. C., Aguena, M., Allam, S., Annis, J., Bacon, D., Bertin, E., Bocquet, S., Brooks, D., Burke, D. L., Carretero, J., Costanzi, M., da Costa, L. N., Pereira, M. E. S., De Vicente, J., Desai, S., Diehl, H. T., Doel, P., Ferrero, I., Flaugher, B., Frieman, J., García-Bellido, J., Gerdes, D. W., Giannantonio, T., Gschwend, J., Gutierrez, G., Hinton, S. R., Hollowood, D. L., Honscheid, K., James, D. J., Kim, A. G., Kuehn, K., Lahav, O., Marshall, J. L., Menanteau, F., Miquel, R., Morgan, R., Ogando, R. L. C., Palmese, A., Paz-Chinchón, F., Pieres, A., Reil, K., Sanchez, E., Scarpine, V., Serrano, S., Smith, M., Suchyta, E., Swanson, M. E. C., Tarle, G., Thomas, D., To, C., and Weller, J.
Subjects: Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Abstract: We present cosmological constraints from the analysis of angular power spectra of cosmic shear maps based on data from the first three years of observations by the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y3). Our measurements are based on the pseudo-$C_\ell$ method and offer a view complementary to that of the two-point correlation functions in real space, as the two estimators are known to compress and select Gaussian information in different ways, due to scale cuts. They may also be differently affected by systematic effects and theoretical uncertainties, such as baryons and intrinsic alignments (IA), making this analysis an important cross-check. In the context of $\Lambda$CDM, and using the same fiducial model as in the DES Y3 real space analysis, we find ${S_8 \equiv \sigma_8 \sqrt{\Omega_{\rm m}/0.3} = 0.793^{+0.038}_{-0.025}}$, which further improves to ${S_8 = 0.784\pm 0.026 }$ when including shear ratios. This constraint is within expected statistical fluctuations from the real space analysis, and in agreement with DES~Y3 analyses of non-Gaussian statistics, but favors a slightly higher value of $S_8$, which reduces the tension with the Planck cosmic microwave background 2018 results from $2.3\sigma$ in the real space analysis to $1.5\sigma$ in this work. We explore less conservative IA models than the one adopted in our fiducial analysis, finding no clear preference for a more complex model. We also include small scales, using an increased Fourier mode cut-off up to $k_{\rm max}={5}{h{\rm Mpc}^{-1}}$, which allows to constrain baryonic feedback while leaving cosmological constraints essentially unchanged. Finally, we present an approximate reconstruction of the linear matter power spectrum at present time, which is found to be about 20\% lower than predicted by Planck 2018, as reflected by the $1.5\sigma$ lower $S_8$ value.
Published: 2022
Full Text: View/download PDF

16. Dark energy survey year 3 results: cosmological constraints from the analysis of cosmic shear in harmonic space

Author: Doux, C, Jain, B, Zeurcher, D, Lee, J, Fang, X, Rosenfeld, R, Amon, A, Camacho, H, Choi, A, Secco, LF, Blazek, J, Chang, C, Gatti, M, Gaztanaga, E, Jeffrey, N, Raveri, M, Samuroff, S, Alarcon, A, Alves, O, Andrade-Oliveira, F, Baxter, E, Bechtol, K, Becker, MR, Bernstein, GM, Campos, A, Rosell, A Carnero, Kind, M Carrasco, Cawthon, R, Chen, R, Cordero, J, Crocce, M, Davis, C, DeRose, J, Dodelson, S, Drlica-Wagner, A, Eckert, K, Eifler, TF, Elsner, F, Elvin-Poole, J, Everett, S, Ferté, A, Fosalba, P, Friedrich, O, Giannini, G, Gruen, D, Gruendl, RA, Harrison, I, Hartley, WG, Herner, K, Huang, H, Huff, EM, Huterer, D, Jarvis, M, Krause, E, Kuropatkin, N, Leget, P-F, Lemos, P, Liddle, AR, MacCrann, N, McCullough, J, Muir, J, Myles, J, Navarro-Alsina, A, Pandey, S, Park, Y, Porredon, A, Prat, J, Rodriguez-Monroy, M, Rollins, RP, Roodman, A, Ross, AJ, Rykoff, ES, Sánchez, C, Sanchez, J, Sevilla-Noarbe, I, Sheldon, E, Shin, T, Troja, A, Troxel, MA, Tutusaus, I, Varga, TN, Weaverdyck, N, Wechsler, RH, Yanny, B, Yin, B, Zhang, Y, Zuntz, J, Abbott, TMC, Aguena, M, Allam, S, Annis, J, Bacon, D, Bertin, E, Bocquet, S, Brooks, D, Burke, DL, Carretero, J, Costanzi, M, da Costa, LN, and Pereira, MES
Subjects: Particle and High Energy Physics, Physical Sciences, gravitational lensing: weak, cosmological parameters, large-scale structure of Universe, Astronomical and Space Sciences, Astronomy & Astrophysics, Astronomical sciences, Particle and high energy physics, Space sciences
Abstract: We present cosmological constraints from the analysis of angular power spectra of cosmic shear maps based on data from the first three years of observations by the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y3). Our measurements are based on the pseudo-Cℓ method and complement the analysis of the two-point correlation functions in real space, as the two estimators are known to compress and select Gaussian information in different ways, due to scale cuts. They may also be differently affected by systematic effects and theoretical uncertainties, making this analysis an important cross-check. Using the same fiducial Lambda cold dark matter model as in the DES Y3 real-space analysis, we find S8 ≡σ8 √Ωm/0.3 = 0.793-0.025+0.038 , which further improves to S8 = 0.784±0.026 when including shear ratios. This result is within expected statistical fluctuations from the real-space constraint, and in agreement with DES Y3 analyses of non-Gaussian statistics, but favours a slightly higher value of S8 , which reduces the tension with the Planck 2018 constraints from 2.3σ in the real space analysis to 1.5σ here. We explore less conservative intrinsic alignments models than the one adopted in our fiducial analysis, finding no clear preference for a more complex model. We also include small scales, using an increased Fourier mode cut-off up to kmax = 5 h Mpc-1 , which allows to constrain baryonic feedback while leaving cosmological constraints essentially unchanged. Finally, we present an approximate reconstruction of the linear matter power spectrum at present time, found to be about 20 per cent lower than predicted by Planck 2018, as reflected by the lo wer S8 value.
Published: 2022

17. Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Cosmology from combined galaxy clustering and lensing validation on cosmological simulations

Author: DeRose, J, Wechsler, RH, Becker, MR, Rykoff, ES, Pandey, S, MacCrann, N, Amon, A, Myles, J, Krause, E, Gruen, D, Jain, B, Troxel, MA, Prat, J, Alarcon, A, Sánchez, C, Blazek, J, Crocce, M, Giannini, G, Gatti, M, Bernstein, GM, Zuntz, J, Dodelson, S, Fang, X, Friedrich, O, Secco, LF, Elvin-Poole, J, Porredon, A, Everett, S, Choi, A, Harrison, I, Cordero, J, Rodriguez-Monroy, M, McCullough, J, Cawthon, R, Chen, A, Alves, O, Andrade-Oliveira, F, Bechtol, K, Camacho, H, Campos, A, Rosell, A Carnero, Kind, M Carrasco, Diehl, HT, Drlica-Wagner, A, Eckert, K, Eifler, TF, Gruendl, RA, Hartley, WG, Huang, H, Huff, EM, Kuropatkin, N, Raveri, M, Rosenfeld, R, Ross, AJ, Sanchez, J, Sevilla-Noarbe, I, Sheldon, E, Yanny, B, Yin, B, Zhang, Y, Fosalba, P, Aguena, M, Allam, S, Annis, J, Avila, S, Bacon, D, Bhargava, S, Brooks, D, Buckley-Geer, E, Burke, DL, Carretero, J, Castander, FJ, Chang, C, Costanzi, M, da Costa, LN, Pereira, MES, De Vicente, J, Desai, S, Dietrich, JP, Doel, P, Evrard, AE, Ferrero, I, Ferté, A, Flaugher, B, Frieman, J, García-Bellido, J, Gaztanaga, E, Giannantonio, T, Gschwend, J, Gutierrez, G, Hinton, SR, Hollowood, DL, Honscheid, K, Huterer, D, James, DJ, Kuehn, K, Lahav, O, Lima, M, Maia, MAG, and Marshall, JL
Subjects: Astronomical Sciences, Physical Sciences
Abstract: We present a validation of the Dark Energy Survey Year 3 (DES Y3) 3×2-point analysis choices by testing them on Buzzard2.0, a new suite of cosmological simulations that is tailored for the testing and validation of combined galaxy clustering and weak-lensing analyses. We show that the buzzard2.0 simulations accurately reproduce many important aspects of the DES Y3 data, including photometric redshift and magnitude distributions, and the relevant set of two-point clustering and weak-lensing statistics. We then show that our model for the 3×2-point data vector is accurate enough to recover the true cosmology in simulated surveys assuming the true redshift distributions for our source and lens samples, demonstrating robustness to uncertainties in the modeling of the nonlinear matter power spectrum, nonlinear galaxy bias, and higher-order lensing corrections. Additionally, we demonstrate for the first time that our photometric redshift calibration methodology, including information from photometry, spectroscopy, clustering cross-correlations, and galaxy-galaxy lensing ratios, is accurate enough to recover the true cosmology in simulated surveys in the presence of realistic photometric redshift uncertainties.
Published: 2022

18. Cosmic Shear in Harmonic Space from the Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Data: Compatibility with Configuration Space Results

Author: Camacho, H., Andrade-Oliveira, F., Troja, A., Rosenfeld, R., Faga, L., Gomes, R., Doux, C., Fang, X., Lima, M., Miranda, V., Eifler, T. F., Friedrich, O., Gatti, M., Bernstein, G. M., Blazek, J., Bridle, S. L., Choi, A., Davis, C., DeRose, J., Gaztanaga, E., Gruen, D., Hartley, W. G., Hoyle, B., Jarvis, M., MacCrann, N., Prat, J., Rau, M. M., Samuroff, S., Sánchez, C., Sheldon, E., Troxel, M. A., Vielzeuf, P., Zuntz, J., Abbott, T. M. C., Aguena, M., Allam, S., Annis, J., Bacon, D., Bertin, E., Brooks, D., Burke, D. L., Rosell, A. Carnero, Kind, M. Carrasco, Carretero, J., Castander, F. J., Cawthon, R., Costanzi, M., da Costa, L. N., Pereira, M. E. S., De Vicente, J., Desai, S., Diehl, H. T., Doel, P., Everett, S., Evrard, A. E., Ferrero, I., Flaugher, B., Fosalba, P., Friedel, D., Frieman, J., García-Bellido, J., Gerdes, D. W., Gruendl, R. A., Gschwend, J., Gutierrez, G., Hinton, S. R., Hollowood, D. L., Honscheid, K., Huterer, D., James, D. J., Kuehn, K., Kuropatkin, N., Lahav, O., Maia, M. A. G., Marshall, J. L., Melchior, P., Menanteau, F., Miquel, R., Morgan, R., Paz-Chinchón, F., Petravick, D., Pieres, A., Malagón, A. A. Plazas, Reil, K., Rodriguez-Monroy, M., Sanchez, E., Scarpine, V., Schubnell, M., Serrano, S., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Smith, M., Soares-Santos, M., Suchyta, E., Tarle, G., Thomas, D., To, C., Varga, T. N., Weller, J., and Wilkinson, R. D.
Subjects: Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Abstract: We perform a cosmic shear analysis in harmonic space using the first year of data collected by the Dark Energy Survey (DES-Y1). We measure the cosmic weak lensing shear power spectra using the Metacalibration catalogue and perform a likelihood analysis within the framework of CosmoSIS. We set scale cuts based on baryonic effects contamination and model redshift and shear calibration uncertainties as well as intrinsic alignments. We adopt as fiducial covariance matrix an analytical computation accounting for the mask geometry in the Gaussian term, including non-Gaussian contributions. A suite of 1200 lognormal simulations is used to validate the harmonic space pipeline and the covariance matrix. We perform a series of stress tests to gauge the robustness of the harmonic space analysis. Finally, we use the DES-Y1 pipeline in configuration space to perform a similar likelihood analysis and compare both results, demonstrating their compatibility in estimating the cosmological parameters $S_8$, $\sigma_8$ and $\Omega_m$. The methods implemented and validated in this paper will allow us to perform a consistent harmonic space analysis in the upcoming DES data., Comment: 16 pages, 11 figures. This version matches the published one
Published: 2021
Full Text: View/download PDF

19. Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Marginalisation over redshift distribution uncertainties using ranking of discrete realisations

Author: Cordero, Juan P., Harrison, Ian, Rollins, Richard P., Bernstein, G. M., Bridle, S. L., Alarcon, A., Alves, O., Amon, A., Andrade-Oliveira, F., Camacho, H., Campos, A., Choi, A., DeRose, J., Dodelson, S., Eckert, K., Eifler, T. F., Everett, S., Fang, X., Friedrich, O., Gruen, D., Gruendl, R. A., Hartley, W. G., Huff, E. M., Krause, E., Kuropatkin, N., MacCrann, N., McCullough, J., Myles, J., Pandey, S., Raveri, M., Rosenfeld, R., Rykoff, E. S., Sánchez, C., Sánchez, J., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Sheldon, E., Troxel, M., Wechsler, R., Yanny, B., Yin, B., Zhang, Y., Aguena, M., Allam, S., Bertin, E., Brooks, D., Burke, D. L., Rosell, A. Carnero, Kind, M. Carrasco, Carretero, J., Castander, F. J., Cawthon, R., Costanzi, M., da Costa, L., Pereira, M. E. da Silva, De Vicente, J., Diehl, H. T., Dietrich, J., Doel, P., Elvin-Poole, J., Ferrero, I., Flaugher, B., Fosalba, P., Frieman, J., Garcia-Bellido, J., Gerdes, D., Gschwend, J., Gutierrez, G., Hinton, S., Hollowood, D. L., Honscheid, K., Hoyle, B., James, D., Kuehn, K., Lahav, O., Maia, M. A. G., March, M., Menanteau, F., Miquel, R., Morgan, R., Muir, J., Palmese, A., Paz-Chinchon, F., Pieres, A., Malagón, A. Plazas, Sánchez, E., Scarpine, V., Serrano, S., Smith, M., Soares-Santos, M., Suchyta, E., Swanson, M., Tarle, G., Thomas, D., To, C., and Varga, T. N.
Subjects: Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Abstract: Cosmological information from weak lensing surveys is maximised by dividing source galaxies into tomographic sub-samples for which the redshift distributions are estimated. Uncertainties on these redshift distributions must be correctly propagated into the cosmological results. We present hyperrank, a new method for marginalising over redshift distribution uncertainties in cosmological analyses, using discrete samples from the space of all possible redshift distributions. This is demonstrated in contrast to previous highly simplified parametric models of the redshift distribution uncertainty. In hyperrank the set of proposed redshift distributions is ranked according to a small (in this work between one and four) number of summary values, which are then sampled along with other nuisance parameters and cosmological parameters in the Monte Carlo chain used for inference. This can be regarded as a general method for marginalising over discrete realisations of data vector variation with nuisance parameters, which can consequently be sampled separately to the main parameters of interest, allowing for increased computational efficiency. We focus on the case of weak lensing cosmic shear analyses and demonstrate our method using simulations made for the Dark Energy Survey (DES). We show the method can correctly and efficiently marginalise over a range of models for the redshift distribution uncertainty. Finally, we compare hyperrank to the common mean-shifting method of marginalising over redshift uncertainty, validating that this simpler model is sufficient for use in the DES Year 3 cosmology results presented in companion papers., Comment: Accepted for publication in MNRAS. 17 pages, 12 figures, comments welcome Replacement: Added small comments suggested by referee
Published: 2021
Full Text: View/download PDF

20. Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Exploiting small-scale information with lensing shear ratios

Author: Sánchez, C, Prat, J, Zacharegkas, G, Pandey, S, Baxter, E, Bernstein, GM, Blazek, J, Cawthon, R, Chang, C, Krause, E, Lemos, P, Park, Y, Raveri, M, Sanchez, J, Troxel, MA, Amon, A, Fang, X, Friedrich, O, Gruen, D, Porredon, A, Secco, LF, Samuroff, S, Alarcon, A, Alves, O, Andrade-Oliveira, F, Bechtol, K, Becker, MR, Camacho, H, Campos, A, Rosell, A Carnero, Kind, M Carrasco, Chen, R, Choi, A, Crocce, M, Davis, C, De Vicente, J, DeRose, J, Di Valentino, E, Diehl, HT, Dodelson, S, Doux, C, Drlica-Wagner, A, Eckert, K, Eifler, TF, Elsner, F, Elvin-Poole, J, Everett, S, Ferté, A, Fosalba, P, Gatti, M, Giannini, G, Gruendl, RA, Harrison, I, Hartley, WG, Herner, K, Huff, EM, Huterer, D, Jarvis, M, Jain, B, Kuropatkin, N, Leget, P-F, MacCrann, N, McCullough, J, Muir, J, Myles, J, Navarro-Alsina, A, Rollins, RP, Roodman, A, Rosenfeld, R, Rykoff, ES, Sevilla-Noarbe, I, Sheldon, E, Shin, T, Troja, A, Tutusaus, I, Varga, TN, Wechsler, RH, Yanny, B, Yin, B, Zhang, Y, Zuntz, J, Abbott, TMC, Aguena, M, Allam, S, Bacon, D, Bertin, E, Bhargava, S, Brooks, D, Buckley-Geer, E, Burke, DL, Carretero, J, Costanzi, M, da Costa, LN, Pereira, MES, Desai, S, Dietrich, JP, Doel, P, Evrard, AE, Ferrero, I, and Flaugher, B
Subjects: Particle and High Energy Physics, Astronomical Sciences, Physical Sciences
Abstract: Using the first three years of data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES), we use ratios of small-scale galaxy-galaxy lensing measurements around the same lens sample to constrain source redshift uncertainties, intrinsic alignments and other systematics or nuisance parameters of our model. Instead of using a simple geometric approach for the ratios as has been done in the past, we use the full modeling of the galaxy-galaxy lensing measurements, including the corresponding integration over the power spectrum and the contributions from intrinsic alignments and lens magnification. We perform extensive testing of the small-scale shear-ratio (SR) modeling by studying the impact of different effects such as the inclusion of baryonic physics, nonlinear biasing, halo occupation distribution descriptions and lens magnification, among others, and using realistic N-body simulations of the DES data. We validate the robustness of our constraints in the data by using two independent lens samples with different galaxy properties, and by deriving constraints using the corresponding large-scale ratios for which the modeling is simpler. The results applied to the DES Y3 data demonstrate how the ratios provide significant improvements in constraining power for several nuisance parameters in our model, especially on source redshift calibration and intrinsic alignments. For source redshifts, SR improves the constraints from the prior by up to 38% in some redshift bins. Such improvements, and especially the constraints it provides on intrinsic alignments, translate to tighter cosmological constraints when shear ratios are combined with cosmic shear and other 2pt functions. In particular, for the DES Y3 data, SR improves S8 constraints from cosmic shear by up to 31%, and for the full combination of probes (3×2pt) by up to 10%. The shear ratios presented in this work are used as an additional likelihood for cosmic shear, 2×2pt and the full 3×2pt in the fiducial DES Y3 cosmological analysis.
Published: 2022

21. Biophotonics—Intraoperative Guidance During Partial Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Author: Egen, Luisa, Demmel, Greta S., Grilli, Maurizio, Studier-Fischer, Alexander, Nickel, Felix, Haney, Caelan M., Mühlbauer, Julia, Hartung, Friedrich O., Menold, Hanna S., Piazza, Pietro, Rivas, Juan Gomez, Checcucci, Enrico, Puliatti, Stefano, Belenchon, Ines Rivero, Taratkin, Mark, Rodler, Severin, Cacciamani, Giovanni, Michel, Maurice S., and Kowalewski, Karl-Friedrich
Published: 2024
Full Text: View/download PDF

22. Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: galaxy clustering and systematics treatment for lens galaxy samples

Author: Rodríguez-Monroy, M, Weaverdyck, N, Elvin-Poole, J, Crocce, M, Rosell, A Carnero, Andrade-Oliveira, F, Avila, S, Bechtol, K, Bernstein, GM, Blazek, J, Camacho, H, Cawthon, R, De Vicente, J, DeRose, J, Dodelson, S, Everett, S, Fang, X, Ferrero, I, Ferté, A, Friedrich, O, Gaztanaga, E, Giannini, G, Gruendl, RA, Hartley, WG, Herner, K, Huff, EM, Jarvis, M, Krause, E, MacCrann, N, Mena-Fernández, J, Muir, J, Pandey, S, Park, Y, Porredon, A, Prat, J, Rosenfeld, R, Ross, AJ, Rozo, E, Rykoff, ES, Sanchez, E, Cid, D Sanchez, Sevilla-Noarbe, I, Tabbutt, M, To, C, Wagoner, EL, Wechsler, RH, Aguena, M, Allam, S, Amon, A, Annis, J, Bacon, D, Baxter, E, Bertin, E, Bhargava, S, Brooks, D, Burke, DL, Kind, M Carrasco, Carretero, J, Castander, FJ, Choi, A, Conselice, C, Costanzi, M, da Costa, LN, Pereira, MES, Desai, S, Diehl, HT, Flaugher, B, Fosalba, P, Frieman, J, García-Bellido, J, Giannantonio, T, Gruen, D, Gschwend, J, Gutierrez, G, Hinton, SR, Hollowood, DL, Honscheid, K, Huterer, D, Jain, B, James, DJ, Kuehn, K, Kuropatkin, N, Lima, M, Maia, MAG, March, M, Marshall, JL, Melchior, P, Menanteau, F, Miller, CJ, Miquel, R, Mohr, JJ, Morgan, R, Palmese, A, Paz-Chinchón, F, Pieres, A, Malagón, AA Plazas, Roodman, A, Scarpine, V, Serrano, S, and Smith, M
Subjects: Nuclear and Plasma Physics, Physical Sciences, cosmological parameters, cosmology: observations, dark energy, large-scale structure of the Universe, Astronomical and Space Sciences, Astronomy & Astrophysics, Astronomical sciences, Particle and high energy physics, Space sciences
Abstract: In this work, we present the galaxy clustering measurements of the two DES lens galaxy samples: a magnitude-limited sample optimized for the measurement of cosmological parameters, maglim, and a sample of luminous red galaxies selected with the redmagic algorithm. maglim/redmagic sample contains over 10 million/2.5 million galaxies and is divided into six/five photometric redshift bins spanning the range z [0.20, 1.05]/z [0.15, 0.90]. Both samples cover 4143 °2 over which we perform our analysis blind, measuring the angular correlation function with an S/N ∼63 for both samples. In a companion paper, these measurements of galaxy clustering are combined with the correlation functions of cosmic shear and galaxy-galaxy lensing of each sample to place cosmological constraints with a 3 × 2pt analysis. We conduct a thorough study of the mitigation of systematic effects caused by the spatially varying survey properties and we correct the measurements to remove artificial clustering signals. We employ several decontamination methods with different configurations to ensure the robustness of our corrections and to determine the systematic uncertainty that needs to be considered for the final cosmology analyses. We validate our fiducial methodology using lognormal mocks, showing that our decontamination procedure induces biases no greater than 0.5σ in the (ωm, b) plane, where b is the galaxy bias.
Published: 2022

23. Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and weak lensing

Author: Abbott, TMC, Aguena, M, Alarcon, A, Allam, S, Alves, O, Amon, A, Andrade-Oliveira, F, Annis, J, Avila, S, Bacon, D, Baxter, E, Bechtol, K, Becker, MR, Bernstein, GM, Bhargava, S, Birrer, S, Blazek, J, Brandao-Souza, A, Bridle, SL, Brooks, D, Buckley-Geer, E, Burke, DL, Camacho, H, Campos, A, Rosell, A Carnero, Kind, M Carrasco, Carretero, J, Castander, FJ, Cawthon, R, Chang, C, Chen, A, Chen, R, Choi, A, Conselice, C, Cordero, J, Costanzi, M, Crocce, M, da Costa, LN, da Silva Pereira, ME, Davis, C, Davis, TM, De Vicente, J, DeRose, J, Desai, S, Di Valentino, E, Diehl, HT, Dietrich, JP, Dodelson, S, Doel, P, Doux, C, Drlica-Wagner, A, Eckert, K, Eifler, TF, Elsner, F, Elvin-Poole, J, Everett, S, Evrard, AE, Fang, X, Farahi, A, Fernandez, E, Ferrero, I, Ferté, A, Fosalba, P, Friedrich, O, Frieman, J, García-Bellido, J, Gatti, M, Gaztanaga, E, Gerdes, DW, Giannantonio, T, Giannini, G, Gruen, D, Gruendl, RA, Gschwend, J, Gutierrez, G, Harrison, I, Hartley, WG, Herner, K, Hinton, SR, Hollowood, DL, Honscheid, K, Hoyle, B, Huff, EM, Huterer, D, Jain, B, James, DJ, Jarvis, M, Jeffrey, N, Jeltema, T, Kovacs, A, Krause, E, Kron, R, Kuehn, K, Kuropatkin, N, Lahav, O, Leget, P-F, Lemos, P, Liddle, AR, Lidman, C, and Lima, M
Subjects: Astronomical Sciences, Physical Sciences
Abstract: We present the first cosmology results from large-scale structure using the full 5000 deg2 of imaging data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Data Release 1. We perform an analysis of large-scale structure combining three two-point correlation functions (3×2pt): (i) cosmic shear using 100 million source galaxies, (ii) galaxy clustering, and (iii) the cross-correlation of source galaxy shear with lens galaxy positions, galaxy-galaxy lensing. To achieve the cosmological precision enabled by these measurements has required updates to nearly every part of the analysis from DES Year 1, including the use of two independent galaxy clustering samples, modeling advances, and several novel improvements in the calibration of gravitational shear and photometric redshift inference. The analysis was performed under strict conditions to mitigate confirmation or observer bias; we describe specific changes made to the lens galaxy sample following unblinding of the results and tests of the robustness of our results to this decision. We model the data within the flat ΛCDM and wCDM cosmological models, marginalizing over 25 nuisance parameters. We find consistent cosmological results between the three two-point correlation functions; their combination yields clustering amplitude S8=0.776-0.017+0.017 and matter density ωm=0.339-0.031+0.032 in ΛCDM, mean with 68% confidence limits; S8=0.775-0.024+0.026, ωm=0.352-0.041+0.035, and dark energy equation-of-state parameter w=-0.98-0.20+0.32 in wCDM. These constraints correspond to an improvement in signal-to-noise of the DES Year 3 3×2pt data relative to DES Year 1 by a factor of 2.1, about 20% more than expected from the increase in observing area alone. This combination of DES data is consistent with the prediction of the model favored by the Planck 2018 cosmic microwave background (CMB) primary anisotropy data, which is quantified with a probability-to-exceed p=0.13-0.48. We find better agreement between DES 3×2pt and Planck than in DES Y1, despite the significantly improved precision of both. When combining DES 3×2pt data with available baryon acoustic oscillation, redshift-space distortion, and type Ia supernovae data, we find p=0.34. Combining all of these datasets with Planck CMB lensing yields joint parameter constraints of S8=0.812-0.008+0.008, ωm=0.306-0.005+0.004, h=0.680-0.003+0.004, and mν
Published: 2022

24. Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing

Author: DES Collaboration, Abbott, T. M. C., Aguena, M., Alarcon, A., Allam, S., Alves, O., Amon, A., Andrade-Oliveira, F., Annis, J., Avila, S., Bacon, D., Baxter, E., Bechtol, K., Becker, M. R., Bernstein, G. M., Bhargava, S., Birrer, S., Blazek, J., Brandao-Souza, A., Bridle, S. L., Brooks, D., Buckley-Geer, E., Burke, D. L., Camacho, H., Campos, A., Rosell, A. Carnero, Kind, M. Carrasco, Carretero, J., Castander, F. J., Cawthon, R., Chang, C., Chen, A., Chen, R., Choi, A., Conselice, C., Cordero, J., Costanzi, M., Crocce, M., da Costa, L. N., Pereira, M. E. da Silva, Davis, C., Davis, T. M., De Vicente, J., DeRose, J., Desai, S., Di Valentino, E., Diehl, H. T., Dietrich, J. P., Dodelson, S., Doel, P., Doux, C., Drlica-Wagner, A., Eckert, K., Eifler, T. F., Elsner, F., Elvin-Poole, J., Everett, S., Evrard, A. E., Fang, X., Farahi, A., Fernandez, E., Ferrero, I., Ferté, A., Fosalba, P., Friedrich, O., Frieman, J., García-Bellido, J., Gatti, M., Gaztanaga, E., Gerdes, D. W., Giannantonio, T., Giannini, G., Gruen, D., Gruendl, R. A., Gschwend, J., Gutierrez, G., Harrison, I., Hartley, W. G., Herner, K., Hinton, S. R., Hollowood, D. L., Honscheid, K., Hoyle, B., Huff, E. M., Huterer, D., Jain, B., James, D. J., Jarvis, M., Jeffrey, N., Jeltema, T., Kovacs, A., Krause, E., Kron, R., Kuehn, K., Kuropatkin, N., Lahav, O., Leget, P. -F., Lemos, P., Liddle, A. R., Lidman, C., Lima, M., Lin, H., MacCrann, N., Maia, M. A. G., Marshall, J. L., Martini, P., McCullough, J., Melchior, P., Mena-Fernández, J., Menanteau, F., Miquel, R., Mohr, J. J., Morgan, R., Muir, J., Myles, J., Nadathur, S., Navarro-Alsina, A., Nichol, R. C., Ogando, R. L. C., Omori, Y., Palmese, A., Pandey, S., Park, Y., Paz-Chinchón, F., Petravick, D., Pieres, A., Malagón, A. A. Plazas, Porredon, A., Prat, J., Raveri, M., Rodriguez-Monroy, M., Rollins, R. P., Romer, A. K., Roodman, A., Rosenfeld, R., Ross, A. J., Rykoff, E. S., Samuroff, S., Sánchez, C., Sanchez, E., Sanchez, J., Cid, D. Sanchez, Scarpine, V., Schubnell, M., Scolnic, D., Secco, L. F., Serrano, S., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Sheldon, E., Shin, T., Smith, M., Soares-Santos, M., Suchyta, E., Swanson, M. E. C., Tabbutt, M., Tarle, G., Thomas, D., To, C., Troja, A., Troxel, M. A., Tucker, D. L., Tutusaus, I., Varga, T. N., Walker, A. R., Weaverdyck, N., Wechsler, R., Weller, J., Yanny, B., Yin, B., Zhang, Y., and Zuntz, J.
Subjects: Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Abstract: We present the first cosmology results from large-scale structure in the Dark Energy Survey (DES) spanning 5000 deg$^2$. We perform an analysis combining three two-point correlation functions (3$\times$2pt): (i) cosmic shear using 100 million source galaxies, (ii) galaxy clustering, and (iii) the cross-correlation of source galaxy shear with lens galaxy positions. The analysis was designed to mitigate confirmation or observer bias; we describe specific changes made to the lens galaxy sample following unblinding of the results. We model the data within the flat $\Lambda$CDM and $w$CDM cosmological models. We find consistent cosmological results between the three two-point correlation functions; their combination yields clustering amplitude $S_8=0.776^{+0.017}_{-0.017}$ and matter density $\Omega_{\mathrm{m}} = 0.339^{+0.032}_{-0.031}$ in $\Lambda$CDM, mean with 68% confidence limits; $S_8=0.775^{+0.026}_{-0.024}$, $\Omega_{\mathrm{m}} = 0.352^{+0.035}_{-0.041}$, and dark energy equation-of-state parameter $w=-0.98^{+0.32}_{-0.20}$ in $w$CDM. This combination of DES data is consistent with the prediction of the model favored by the Planck 2018 cosmic microwave background (CMB) primary anisotropy data, which is quantified with a probability-to-exceed $p=0.13$ to $0.48$. When combining DES 3$\times$2pt data with available baryon acoustic oscillation, redshift-space distortion, and type Ia supernovae data, we find $p=0.34$. Combining all of these data sets with Planck CMB lensing yields joint parameter constraints of $S_8 = 0.812^{+0.008}_{-0.008}$, $\Omega_{\mathrm{m}} = 0.306^{+0.004}_{-0.005}$, $h=0.680^{+0.004}_{-0.003}$, and $\sum m_{\nu}<0.13 \;\mathrm{eV\; (95\% \;CL)}$ in $\Lambda$CDM; $S_8 = 0.812^{+0.008}_{-0.008}$, $\Omega_{\mathrm{m}} = 0.302^{+0.006}_{-0.006}$, $h=0.687^{+0.006}_{-0.007}$, and $w=-1.031^{+0.030}_{-0.027}$ in $w$CDM. (abridged), Comment: See https://www.darkenergysurvey.org/des-year-3-cosmology-results-papers/ for the full DES Y3 3x2pt cosmology release. Matches version accepted in PRD
Published: 2021
Full Text: View/download PDF

25. Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: cosmology from combined galaxy clustering and lensing -- validation on cosmological simulations

Author: DeRose, J., Wechsler, R. H., Becker, M. R., Rykoff, E. S., Pandey, S., MacCrann, N., Amon, A., Myles, J., Krause, E., Gruen, D., Jain, B., Troxel, M. A., Prat, J., Alarcon, A., Sánchez, C., Blazek, J., Crocce, M., Giannini, G., Gatti, M., Bernstein, G. M., Zuntz, J., Dodelson, S., Fang, X., Friedrich, O., Secco, L. F., Elvin-Poole, J., Everett, S., Choi, A., Harrison, I., Cordero, J., Rodriguez-Monroy, M., McCullough, J., Cawthon, R., Chen, A., Alves, O., Camacho, H., Campos, A., Diehl, H. T., Drlica-Wagner, A., Eifler, T. F., Fosalba, P., Huang, H., Porredon, A., Raveri, M., Rosenfeld, R., Ross, A. J., Sanchez, J., Sheldon, E., Yanny, B., Yin, B., Aguena, M., Allam, S., Andrade-Oliveira, F., Annis, J., Avila, S., Bacon, D., Bechtol, K., Bhargava, S., Brooks, D., Buckley-Geer, E., Burke, D. L., Rosell, A. Carnero, Kind, M. Carrasco, Chang, C., Costanzi, M., da Costa, L. N., Pereira, M. E. S., De Vicente, J., Desai, S., Dietrich, J. P., Doel, P., Eckert, K., Evrard, A. E., Ferrero, I., Ferté, A., Flaugher, B., Frieman, J., García-Bellido, J., Gaztanaga, E., Giannantonio, T., Gruendl, R. A., Gschwend, J., Gutierrez, G., Hartley, W. G., Hinton, S. R., Hollowood, D. L., Honscheid, K., Huff, E. M., Huterer, D., James, D. J., Kuehn, K., Kuropatkin, N., Lahav, O., Lima, M., Maia, M. A. G., Marshall, J. L., Melchior, P., Menanteau, F., Miquel, R., Mohr, J. J., Morgan, R., Palmese, A., Paz-Chinchón, F., Pieres, A., Malagón, A. A. Plazas, Sanchez, E., Scarpine, V., Serrano, S., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Smith, M., Soares-Santos, M., Suchyta, E., Tarle, G., Thomas, D., To, C., Varga, T. N., and Zhang, Y.
Subjects: Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Abstract: We present a validation of the Dark Energy Survey Year 3 (DES Y3) $3\times2$-point analysis choices by testing them on Buzzard v2.0, a new suite of cosmological simulations that is tailored for the testing and validation of combined galaxy clustering and weak lensing analyses. We show that the Buzzard v2.0 simulations accurately reproduce many important aspects of the DES Y3 data, including photometric redshift and magnitude distributions, and the relevant set of two-point clustering and weak lensing statistics. We then show that our model for the $3\times2$-point data vector is accurate enough to recover the true cosmology in simulated surveys assuming the true redshift distributions for our source and lens samples, demonstrating robustness to uncertainties in the modeling of the non-linear matter power spectrum, non-linear galaxy bias and higher-order lensing corrections. Additionally, we demonstrate for the first time that our photometric redshift calibration methodology, including information from photometry, spectroscopy, clustering cross-correlations, and galaxy-galaxy lensing ratios, is accurate enough to recover the true cosmology in simulated surveys in the presence of realistic photometric redshift uncertainties., Comment: 29 pages, 10 figures, see this URL for the full DES Y3 cosmology release: https://www.darkenergysurvey.org/des-year-3-cosmology-results-papers/
Published: 2021
Full Text: View/download PDF

26. Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Exploiting small-scale information with lensing shear ratios

Author: Sánchez, C., Prat, J., Zacharegkas, G., Pandey, S., Baxter, E., Bernstein, G. M., Blazek, J., Cawthon, R., Chang, C., Krause, E., Lemos, P., Park, Y., Raveri, M., Sanchez, J., Troxel, M. A., Amon, A., Fang, X., Friedrich, O., Gruen, D., Porredon, A., Secco, L. F., Samuroff, S., Alarcon, A., Alves, O., Andrade-Oliveira, F., Bechtol, K., Becker, M. R., Camacho, H., Campos, A., Rosell, A. Carnero, Kind, M. Carrasco, Chen, R., Choi, A., Crocce, M., Davis, C., De Vicente, J., DeRose, J., Di Valentino, E., Diehl, H. T., Dodelson, S., Doux, C., Drlica-Wagner, A., Eckert, K., Eifler, T. F., Elsner, F., Elvin-Poole, J., Everett, S., Ferté, A., Fosalba, P., Gatti, M., Giannini, G., Gruendl, R. A., Harrison, I., Hartley, W. G., Herner, K., Huff, E. M., Huterer, D., Jarvis, M., Jain, B., Kuropatkin, N., Leget, P. -F., MacCrann, N., McCullough, J., Muir, J., Myles, J., Navarro-Alsina, A., Rollins, R. P., Roodman, A., Rosenfeld, R., Rykoff, E. S., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Sheldon, E., Shin, T., Troja, A., Tutusaus, I., Varga, T. N., Wechsler, R. H., Yanny, B., Yin, B., Zhang, Y., Zuntz, J., Abbott, T. M. C., Aguena, M., Allam, S., Bacon, D., Bertin, E., Bhargava, S., Brooks, D., Buckley-Geer, E., Burke, D. L., Carretero, J., Costanzi, M., da Costa, L. N., Pereira, M. E. S., Desai, S., Dietrich, J. P., Doel, P., Evrard, A. E., Ferrero, I., Flaugher, B., Frieman, J., García-Bellido, J., Gaztanaga, E., Gerdes, D. W., Giannantonio, T., Gschwend, J., Gutierrez, G., Hinton, S. R., Hollowood, D. L., Honscheid, K., Hoyle, B., James, D. J., Kuehn, K., Lahav, O., Lima, M., Lin, H., Maia, M. A. G., Marshall, J. L., Martini, P., Melchior, P., Menanteau, F., Miquel, R., Mohr, J. J., Morgan, R., Palmese, A., Paz-Chinchón, F., Petravick, D., Pieres, A., Malagón, A. A. Plazas, Rodriguez-Monroy, M., Sanchez, E., Scarpine, V., Schubnell, M., Serrano, S., Smith, M., Soares-Santos, M., Suchyta, E., Swanson, M. E. C., Tarle, G., Thomas, D., and To, C.
Subjects: Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Abstract: Using the first three years of data from the Dark Energy Survey, we use ratios of small-scale galaxy-galaxy lensing measurements around the same lens sample to constrain source redshift uncertainties, intrinsic alignments and other nuisance parameters of our model. Instead of using a simple geometric approach for the ratios, we use the full modeling of the galaxy-galaxy lensing measurements, including the corresponding integration over the power spectrum and the contributions from intrinsic alignments and lens magnification. We perform extensive testing of the small-scale shear ratio (SR) modeling by studying the impact of different effects such as the inclusion of baryonic physics, non-linear biasing, halo occupation distribution descriptions and lens magnification, among others, and using realistic $N$-body simulations. We validate the robustness of our constraints in the data by using two independent lens samples, and by deriving constraints using the corresponding large-scale ratios for which the modeling is simpler. The DES Y3 results demonstrate how the ratios provide significant improvements in constraining power for several nuisance parameters in our model, especially on source redshift calibration and intrinsic alignments (IA). For source redshifts, SR improves the constraints from the prior by up to 38\% in some redshift bins. Such improvements, and especially the constraints it provides on IA, translate to tighter cosmological constraints when SR is combined with cosmic shear and other 2pt functions. In particular, for the DES Y3 data, SR improves $S_8$ constraints from cosmic shear by up to 31\%, and for the full combination of probes (3$\times$2pt) by up to 10\%. The shear ratios presented in this work are used as an additional likelihood for cosmic shear, 2$\times$2pt and the full 3$\times$2pt in the fiducial DES Y3 cosmological analysis., Comment: 29 pages, 17 figures, accepted by PRD. This version matches the published version
Published: 2021
Full Text: View/download PDF

27. Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: High-precision measurement and modeling of galaxy-galaxy lensing

Author: Prat, J., Blazek, J., Sánchez, C., Tutusaus, I., Pandey, S., Elvin-Poole, J., Krause, E., Troxel, M. A., Secco, L. F., Amon, A., DeRose, J., Zacharegkas, G., Chang, C., Jain, B., MacCrann, N., Park, Y., Sheldon, E., Giannini, G., Bocquet, S., To, C., Alarcon, A., Alves, O., Andrade-Oliveira, F., Baxter, E., Bechtol, K., Becker, M. R., Bernstein, G. M., Camacho, H., Campos, A., Rosell, A. Carnero, Kind, M. Carrasco, Cawthon, R., Chen, R., Choi, A., Cordero, J., Crocce, M., Davis, C., De Vicente, J., Diehl, H. T., Dodelson, S., Doux, C., Drlica-Wagner, A., Eckert, K., Eifler, T. F., Elsner, F., Everett, S., Fang, X., Farahi, A., Ferté, A., Fosalba, P., Friedrich, O., Gatti, M., Gruen, D., Gruendl, R. A., Harrison, I., Hartley, W. G., Herner, K., Huang, H., Huff, E. M., Huterer, D., Jarvis, M., Kuropatkin, N., Leget, P. -F., Lemos, P., Liddle, A. R., McCullough, J., Muir, J., Myles, J., Navarro-Alsina, A., Porredon, A., Raveri, M., Rodriguez-Monroy, M., Rollins, R. P., Roodman, A., Rosenfeld, R., Ross, A. J., Rykoff, E. S., Sanchez, J., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Shin, T., Troja, A., Varga, T. N., Weaverdyck, N., Wechsler, R. H., Yanny, B., Yin, B., Zuntz, J., Abbott, T. M. C., Aguena, M., Allam, S., Annis, J., Bacon, D., Brooks, D., Burke, D. L., Carretero, J., Conselice, C., Costanzi, M., da Costa, L. N., Pereira, M. E. S., Desai, S., Dietrich, J. P., Doel, P., Evrard, A. E., Ferrero, I., Flaugher, B., Frieman, J., García-Bellido, J., Gaztanaga, E., Gerdes, D. W., Giannantonio, T., Gschwend, J., Gutierrez, G., Hinton, S. R., Hollowood, D. L., Honscheid, K., James, D. J., Kuehn, K., Lahav, O., Lin, H., Maia, M. A. G., Marshall, J. L., Martini, P., Melchior, P., Menanteau, F., Miller, C. J., Miquel, R., Mohr, J. J., Morgan, R., Ogando, R. L. C., Palmese, A., Paz-Chinchón, F., Petravick, D., Malagón, A. A. Plazas, Sanchez, E., Serrano, S., Smith, M., Soares-Santos, M., Suchyta, E., Tarle, G., Thomas, D., and Weller, J.
Subjects: Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Abstract: We present and characterize the galaxy-galaxy lensing signal measured using the first three years of data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES Y3) covering 4132 deg$^2$. These galaxy-galaxy measurements are used in the DES Y3 3$\times$2pt cosmological analysis, which combines weak lensing and galaxy clustering information. We use two lens samples: a magnitude-limited sample and the redMaGic sample, which span the redshift range $\sim 0.2-1$ with 10.7 M and 2.6 M galaxies respectively. For the source catalog, we use the Metacalibration shape sample, consisting of $\simeq$100 M galaxies separated into 4 tomographic bins. Our galaxy-galaxy lensing estimator is the mean tangential shear, for which we obtain a total S/N of $\sim$148 for MagLim ($\sim$120 for redMaGic), and $\sim$67 ($\sim$55) after applying the scale cuts of 6 Mpc/$h$. Thus we reach percent-level statistical precision, which requires that our modeling and systematic-error control be of comparable accuracy. The tangential shear model used in the 3$\times$2pt cosmological analysis includes lens magnification, a five-parameter intrinsic alignment model (TATT), marginalization over a point-mass to remove information from small scales and a linear galaxy bias model validated with higher-order terms. We explore the impact of these choices on the tangential shear observable and study the significance of effects not included in our model, such as reduced shear, source magnification and source clustering. We also test the robustness of our measurements to various observational and systematics effects, such as the impact of observing conditions, lens-source clustering, random-point subtraction, scale-dependent Metacalibration responses, PSF residuals, and B-modes., Comment: 33 pages, 18 figures, accepted by PRD
Published: 2021
Full Text: View/download PDF

28. Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Galaxy clustering and systematics treatment for lens galaxy samples

Author: Rodríguez-Monroy, M., Weaverdyck, N., Elvin-Poole, J., Crocce, M., Rosell, A. Carnero, Andrade-Oliveira, F., Avila, S., Bechtol, K., Bernstein, G. M., Blazek, J., Camacho, H., Cawthon, R., De Vicente, J., DeRose, J., Dodelson, S., Everett, S., Fang, X., Ferrero, I., Ferté, A., Friedrich, O., Gaztanaga, E., Giannini, G., Gruendl, R. A., Hartley, W. G., Herner, K., Huff, E. M., Jarvis, M., Krause, E., MacCrann, N., Mena-Fernández, J., Muir, J., Pandey, S., Park, Y., Porredon, A., Prat, J., Rosenfeld, R., Ross, A. J., Rozo, E., Rykoff, E. S., Sanchez, E., Cid, D. Sanchez, Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Tabbutt, M., To, C., Wagoner, E. L., Wechsler, R. H., Aguena, M., Allam, S., Amon, A., Annis, J., Bacon, D., Baxter, E., Bertin, E., Bhargava, S., Brooks, D., Burke, D. L., Kind, M. Carrasco, Carretero, J., Castander, F. J., Choi, A., Conselice, C., Costanzi, M., da Costa, L. N., Pereira, M. E. S., Desai, S., Diehl, H. T., Flaugher, B., Fosalba, P., Frieman, J., García-Bellido, J., Giannantonio, T., Gruen, D., Gschwend, J., Gutierrez, G., Hinton, S. R., Hollowood, D. L., Honscheid, K., Huterer, D., Jain, B., James, D. J., Kuehn, K., Kuropatkin, N., Lima, M., Maia, M. A. G., March, M., Marshall, J. L., Melchior, P., Menanteau, F., Miller, C. J., Miquel, R., Mohr, J. J., Morgan, R., Palmese, A., Paz-Chinchón, F., Pieres, A., Malagón, A. A. Plazas, Roodman, A., Scarpine, V., Serrano, S., Smith, M., Soares-Santos, M., Suchyta, E., Tarle, G., Thomas, D., and Varga, T. N.
Subjects: Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Abstract: In this work we present the galaxy clustering measurements of the two DES lens galaxy samples: a magnitude-limited sample optimized for the measurement of cosmological parameters, MagLim, and a sample of luminous red galaxies selected with the redMaGiC algorithm. MagLim / redMaGiC sample contains over 10 million / 2.5 million galaxies and is divided into six / five photometric redshift bins spanning the range $z\in[0.20,1.05]$ / $z\in[0.15,0.90]$. Both samples cover 4143 deg$^2$ over which we perform our analysis blind, measuring the angular correlation function with a S/N $\sim 63$ for both samples. In a companion paper (DES Collaboration et al. 2021)), these measurements of galaxy clustering are combined with the correlation functions of cosmic shear and galaxy-galaxy lensing of each sample to place cosmological constraints with a 3$\times$2pt analysis. We conduct a thorough study of the mitigation of systematic effects caused by the spatially varying survey properties and we correct the measurements to remove artificial clustering signals. We employ several decontamination methods with different configurations to ensure the robustness of our corrections and to determine the systematic uncertainty that needs to be considered for the final cosmology analyses. We validate our fiducial methodology using log-normal mocks, showing that our decontamination procedure induces biases no greater than $0.5\sigma$ in the $(\Omega_m, b)$ plane, where $b$ is galaxy bias. We demonstrate that failure to remove the artificial clustering would introduce strong biases up to $\sim 7 \sigma$ in $\Omega_m$ and of more than $4 \sigma$ in galaxy bias., Comment: 23 pages, 19 figures, see https://www.darkenergysurvey.org/des-year-3-cosmology-results-papers/ for the full DES Y3 cosmology release
Published: 2021
Full Text: View/download PDF

29. Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Cosmology from Cosmic Shear and Robustness to Data Calibration

Author: Amon, A., Gruen, D., Troxel, M. A., MacCrann, N., Dodelson, S., Choi, A., Doux, C., Secco, L. F., Samuroff, S., Krause, E., Cordero, J., Myles, J., DeRose, J., Wechsler, R. H., Gatti, M., Navarro-Alsina, A., Bernstein, G. M., Jain, B., Blazek, J., Alarcon, A., Ferté, A., Raveri, M., Lemos, P., Campos, A., Prat, J., Sánchez, C., Jarvis, M., Alves, O., Andrade-Oliveira, F., Baxter, E., Bechtol, K., Becker, M. R., Bridle, S. L., Camacho, H., Rosell, A. Carnero, Kind, M. Carrasco, Cawthon, R., Chang, C., Chen, R., Chintalapati, P., Crocce, M., Davis, C., Diehl, H. T., Drlica-Wagner, A., Eckert, K., Eifler, T. F., Elvin-Poole, J., Everett, S., Fang, X., Fosalba, P., Friedrich, O., Giannini, G., Gruendl, R. A., Harrison, I., Hartley, W. G., Herner, K., Huang, H., Huff, E. M., Huterer, D., Kuropatkin, N., Leget, P. -F., Liddle, A. R., McCullough, J., Muir, J., Pandey, S., Park, Y., Porredon, A., Refregier, A., Rollins, R. P., Roodman, A., Rosenfeld, R., Ross, A. J., Rykoff, E. S., Sanchez, J., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Sheldon, E., Shin, T., Troja, A., Tutusaus, I., Varga, T. N., Weaverdyck, N., Yanny, B., Yin, B., Zhang, Y., Zuntz, J., Aguena, M., Allam, S., Annis, J., Bacon, D., Bertin, E., Bhargava, S., Brooks, D., Buckley-Geer, E., Burke, D. L., Carretero, J., Costanzi, M., da Costa, L. N., Pereira, M. E. S., De Vicente, J., Desai, S., Dietrich, J. P., Doel, P., Ferrero, I., Flaugher, B., Frieman, J., García-Bellido, J., Gaztanaga, E., Gerdes, D. W., Giannantonio, T., Gschwend, J., Gutierrez, G., Hinton, S. R., Hollowood, D. L., Honscheid, K., Hoyle, B., James, D. J., Kron, R., Kuehn, K., Lahav, O., Lima, M., Lin, H., Maia, M. A. G., Marshall, J. L., Martini, P., Melchior, P., Menanteau, F., Miquel, R., Mohr, J. J., Morgan, R., Ogando, R. L. C., Palmese, A., Paz-Chinchón, F., Petravick, D., Pieres, A., Malagón, A. A. Plazas, Romer, A. K., Sanchez, E., Scarpine, V., Schubnell, M., Serrano, S., Smith, M., Soares-Santos, M., Suchyta, E., Tarle, G., Thomas, D., To, C., and Weller, J.
Subjects: Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Abstract: This work, together with its companion paper, Secco and Samuroff et al. (2021), presents the Dark Energy Survey Year 3 cosmic shear measurements and cosmological constraints based on an analysis of over 100 million source galaxies. With the data spanning 4143 deg$^2$ on the sky, divided into four redshift bins, we produce the highest significance measurement of cosmic shear to date, with a signal-to-noise of 40. We conduct a blind analysis in the context of the $\Lambda$CDM model and find a 3% constraint of the clustering amplitude, $S_8\equiv \sigma_8 (\Omega_{\rm m}/0.3)^{0.5} = 0.759^{+0.025}_{-0.023}$. A $\Lambda$CDM-Optimized analysis, which safely includes smaller scale information, yields a 2% precision measurement of $S_8= 0.772^{+0.018}_{-0.017}$ that is consistent with the fiducial case. The two low-redshift measurements are statistically consistent with the Planck Cosmic Microwave Background result, however, both recovered $S_8$ values are lower than the high-redshift prediction by $2.3\sigma$ and $2.1\sigma$ ($p$-values of 0.02 and 0.05), respectively. The measurements are shown to be internally consistent across redshift bins, angular scales and correlation functions. The analysis is demonstrated to be robust to calibration systematics, with the $S_8$ posterior consistent when varying the choice of redshift calibration sample, the modeling of redshift uncertainty and methodology. Similarly, we find that the corrections included to account for the blending of galaxies shifts our best-fit $S_8$ by $0.5\sigma$ without incurring a substantial increase in uncertainty. We examine the limiting factors for the precision of the cosmological constraints and find observational systematics to be subdominant to the modeling of astrophysics. Specifically, we identify the uncertainties in modeling baryonic effects and intrinsic alignments as the limiting systematics., Comment: 42 pages, 19 figures
Published: 2021
Full Text: View/download PDF

30. Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing using the MagLim lens sample

Author: Porredon, A., Crocce, M., Elvin-Poole, J., Cawthon, R., Giannini, G., De Vicente, J., Rosell, A. Carnero, Ferrero, I., Krause, E., Fang, X., Prat, J., Rodriguez-Monroy, M., Pandey, S., Pocino, A., Castander, F. J., Choi, A., Amon, A., Tutusaus, I., Dodelson, S., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Fosalba, P., Gaztanaga, E., Alarcon, A., Alves, O., Andrade-Oliveira, F., Baxter, E., Bechtol, K., Becker, M. R., Bernstein, G. M., Blazek, J., Camacho, H., Campos, A., Kind, M. Carrasco, Chintalapati, P., Cordero, J., DeRose, J., Di Valentino, E., Doux, C., Eifler, T. F., Everett, S., Ferté, A., Friedrich, O., Gatti, M., Gruen, D., Harrison, I., Hartley, W. G., Herner, K., Huff, E. M., Huterer, D., Jain, B., Jarvis, M., Lee, S., Lemos, P., MacCrann, N., Mena-Fernández, J., Muir, J., Myles, J., Park, Y., Raveri, M., Rosenfeld, R., Ross, A. J., Rykoff, E. S., Samuroff, S., Sánchez, C., Sanchez, E., Sanchez, J., Cid, D. Sanchez, Scolnic, D., Secco, L. F., Sheldon, E., Troja, A., Troxel, M. A., Weaverdyck, N., Yanny, B., Zuntz, J., Abbott, T. M. C., Aguena, M., Allam, S., Annis, J., Avila, S., Bacon, D., Bertin, E., Bhargava, S., Brooks, D., Buckley-Geer, E., Burke, D. L., Carretero, J., Costanzi, M., da Costa, L. N., Pereira, M. E. S., Davis, T. M., Desai, S., Diehl, H. T., Dietrich, J. P., Doel, P., Drlica-Wagner, A., Eckert, K., Evrard, A. E., Flaugher, B., Frieman, J., García-Bellido, J., Gerdes, D. W., Giannantonio, T., Gruendl, R. A., Gschwend, J., Gutierrez, G., Hinton, S. R., Hollowood, D. L., Honscheid, K., Hoyle, B., James, D. J., Kuehn, K., Kuropatkin, N., Lahav, O., Lidman, C., Lima, M., Lin, H., Maia, M. A. G., Marshall, J. L., Martini, P., Melchior, P., Menanteau, F., Miquel, R., Mohr, J. J., Morgan, R., Ogando, R. L. C., Palmese, A., Paz-Chinchón, F., Petravick, D., Pieres, A., Malagón, A. A. Plazas, Romer, A. K., Santiago, B., Scarpine, V., Schubnell, M., Serrano, S., Smith, M., Soares-Santos, M., Suchyta, E., Tarle, G., Thomas, D., To, C., Varga, T. N., and Weller, J.
Subjects: Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Abstract: Two of the most sensitive probes of the large scale structure of the universe are the clustering of galaxies and the tangential shear of background galaxy shapes produced by those foreground galaxies, so-called galaxy-galaxy lensing. Combining the measurements of these two two-point functions leads to cosmological constraints that are independent of the galaxy bias factor. The optimal choice of foreground, or lens, galaxies is governed by the joint, but conflicting requirements to obtain accurate redshift information and large statistics. We present cosmological results from the full 5000 sq. deg. of the Dark Energy Survey first three years of observations (Y3) combining those two-point functions, using for the first time a magnitude-limited lens sample (MagLim) of 11 million galaxies especially selected to optimize such combination, and 100 million background shapes. We consider two cosmological models, flat $\Lambda$CDM and $w$CDM. In $\Lambda$CDM we obtain for the matter density $\Omega_m = 0.320^{+0.041}_{-0.034}$ and for the clustering amplitude $S_8 = 0.778^{+0.037}_{-0.031}$, at 68% C.L. The latter is only 1$\sigma$ smaller than the prediction in this model informed by measurements of the cosmic microwave background by the Planck satellite. In $w$CDM we find $\Omega_m = 0.32^{+0.044}_{-0.046}$, $S_8=0.777^{+0.049}_{-0.051}$, and dark energy equation of state $w=-1.031^{+0.218}_{-0.379}$. We find that including smaller scales while marginalizing over non-linear galaxy bias improves the constraining power in the $\Omega_m-S_8$ plane by $31$% and in the $\Omega_m-w$ plane by $41$% while yielding consistent cosmological parameters from those in the linear bias case. These results are combined with those from cosmic shear in a companion paper to present full DES-Y3 constraints from the three two-point functions (3x2pt)., Comment: 27 pages, 17 figures, matches the version accepted in PRD. See https://www.darkenergysurvey.org/des-year-3-cosmology-results-papers/ for the full DES Y3 cosmology release
Published: 2021
Full Text: View/download PDF

31. Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Constraints on cosmological parameters and galaxy bias models from galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing using the redMaGiC sample

Author: Pandey, S., Krause, E., DeRose, J., MacCrann, N., Jain, B., Crocce, M., Blazek, J., Choi, A., Huang, H., To, C., Fang, X., Elvin-Poole, J., Prat, J., Porredon, A., Secco, L. F., Rodriguez-Monroy, M., Weaverdyck, N., Park, Y., Raveri, M., Rozo, E., Rykoff, E. S., Bernstein, G. M., Sánchez, C., Jarvis, M., Troxel, M. A., Zacharegkas, G., Chang, C., Alarcon, A., Alves, O., Amon, A., Andrade-Oliveira, F., Baxter, E., Bechtol, K., Becker, M. R., Camacho, H., Campos, A., Rosell, A. Carnero, Kind, M. Carrasco, Cawthon, R., Chen, R., Chintalapati, P., Davis, C., Di Valentino, E., Diehl, H. T., Dodelson, S., Doux, C., Drlica-Wagner, A., Eckert, K., Eifler, T. F., Elsner, F., Everett, S., Farahi, A., Ferté, A., Fosalba, P., Friedrich, O., Gatti, M., Giannini, G., Gruen, D., Gruendl, R. A., Harrison, I., Hartley, W. G., Huff, E. M., Huterer, D., Leget, P. -F., McCullough, J., Muir, J., Myles, J., Navarro-Alsina, A., Omori, Y., Rollins, R. P., Roodman, A., Rosenfeld, R., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Sheldon, E., Shin, T., Troja, A., Tutusaus, I., Varga, T. N., Wechsler, R. H., Yanny, B., Yin, B., Zhang, Y., Zuntz, J., Abbott, T. M. C., Aguena, M., Allam, S., Annis, J., Bacon, D., Bertin, E., Brooks, D., Burke, D. L., Carretero, J., Conselice, C., Costanzi, M., da Costa, L. N., Pereira, M. E. S., De Vicente, J., Dietrich, J. P., Doel, P., Evrard, A. E., Ferrero, I., Flaugher, B., Frieman, J., García-Bellido, J., Gaztanaga, E., Gerdes, D. W., Giannantonio, T., Gschwend, J., Gutierrez, G., Hinton, S. R., Hollowood, D. L., Honscheid, K., James, D. J., Jeltema, T., Kuehn, K., Kuropatkin, N., Lahav, O., Lima, M., Lin, H., Maia, M. A. G., Marshall, J. L., Melchior, P., Menanteau, F., Miller, C. J., Miquel, R., Mohr, J. J., Morgan, R., Palmese, A., Paz-Chinchón, F., Petravick, D., Pieres, A., Malagón, A. A. Plazas, Sanchez, E., Scarpine, V., Serrano, S., Smith, M., Soares-Santos, M., Suchyta, E., Tarle, G., Thomas, D., and Weller, J.
Subjects: Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies
Abstract: We constrain cosmological and galaxy-bias parameters using the combination of galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing measurements from the Dark Energy Survey Year-3 data. We describe our modeling framework, and choice of scales analyzed, validating their robustness to theoretical uncertainties in small-scale clustering by analyzing simulated data. Using a linear galaxy bias model and redMaGiC galaxy sample, we obtain constraints on the matter density to be $\Omega_{\rm m} = 0.325^{+0.033}_{-0.034}$. We also implement a non-linear galaxy bias model to probe smaller scales that includes parameterization based on hybrid perturbation theory and find that it leads to a 17% gain in cosmological constraining power. We perform robustness tests of our methodology pipeline and demonstrate the stability of the constraints to changes in the theoretical model. Using the redMaGiC galaxy sample as foreground lens galaxies, we find the galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing measurements to exhibit significant signals akin to de-correlation between galaxies and mass on large scales, which is not expected in any current models. This likely systematic measurement error biases our constraints on galaxy bias and the $S_8$ parameter. We find that a scale-, redshift- and sky-area-independent phenomenological de-correlation parameter can effectively capture the impact of this systematic error. We trace the source of this de-correlation to a color-dependent photometric issue and minimize its impact on our result by changing the selection criteria of redMaGiC galaxies. Using this new sample, our constraints on the $S_8$ parameter are consistent with previous studies, and we find a small shift in the $\Omega_{\rm m}$ constraints compared to the fiducial redMaGiC sample. We constrain the mean host halo mass of the redMaGiC galaxies in this new sample to be approximately $1.6 \times 10^{13} M_{\odot}/h$., Comment: 34 pages, 23 figures, includes the updated results from a new redmagic sample giving S8 consistent with the cosmic shear results (and also prefers Xlens=1)
Published: 2021
Full Text: View/download PDF

32. Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Cosmology from Cosmic Shear and Robustness to Modeling Uncertainty

Author: Secco, L. F., Samuroff, S., Krause, E., Jain, B., Blazek, J., Raveri, M., Campos, A., Amon, A., Chen, A., Doux, C., Choi, A., Gruen, D., Bernstein, G. M., Chang, C., DeRose, J., Myles, J., Ferté, A., Lemos, P., Huterer, D., Prat, J., Troxel, M. A., MacCrann, N., Liddle, A. R., Kacprzak, T., Fang, X., Sánchez, C., Pandey, S., Dodelson, S., Chintalapati, P., Hoffmann, K., Alarcon, A., Alves, O., Andrade-Oliveira, F., Baxter, E. J., Bechtol, K., Becker, M. R., Brandao-Souza, A., Camacho, H., Rosell, A. Carnero, Kind, M. Carrasco, Cawthon, R., Cordero, J. P., Crocce, M., Davis, C., Di Valentino, E., Drlica-Wagner, A., Eckert, K., Eifler, T. F., Elidaiana, M., Elsner, F., Elvin-Poole, J., Everett, S., Fosalba, P., Friedrich, O., Gatti, M., Giannini, G., Gruendl, R. A., Harrison, I., Hartley, W. G., Herner, K., Huang, H., Huff, E. M., Jarvis, M., Jeffrey, N., Kuropatkin, N., Leget, P. -F., Muir, J., Mccullough, J., Alsina, A. Navarro, Omori, Y., Park, Y., Porredon, A., Rollins, R., Roodman, A., Rosenfeld, R., Ross, A. J., Rykoff, E. S., Sanchez, J., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Sheldon, E. S., Shin, T., Tutusaus, I., Varga, T. N., Weaverdyck, N., Wechsler, R. H., Yanny, B., Yin, B., Zhang, Y., Zuntz, J., Abbott, T. M. C., Aguena, M., Allam, S., Annis, J., Bacon, D., Bertin, E., Bhargava, S., Bridle, S. L., Brooks, D., Buckley-Geer, E., Burke, D. L., Carretero, J., Costanzi, M., da Costa, L. N., De Vicente, J., Diehl, H. T., Dietrich, J. P., Doel, P., Ferrero, I., Flaugher, B., Frieman, J., García-Bellido, J., Gaztanaga, E., Gerdes, D. W., Giannantonio, T., Gschwend, J., Gutierrez, G., Hinton, S. R., Hollowood, D. L., Honscheid, K., Hoyle, B., James, D. J., Jeltema, T., Kuehn, K., Lahav, O., Lima, M., Lin, H., Maia, M. A. G., Marshall, J. L., Martini, P., Melchior, P., Menanteau, F., Miquel, R., Mohr, J. J., Morgan, R., Ogando, R. L. C., Palmese, A., Paz-Chinchón, F., Petravick, D., Pieres, A., Malagón, A. A. Plazas, Rodriguez-Monroy, M., Romer, A. K., Sanchez, E., Scarpine, V., Schubnell, M., Scolnic, D., Serrano, S., Smith, M., Soares-Santos, M., Suchyta, E., Swanson, M. E. C., Tarle, G., Thomas, D., and To, C.
Subjects: Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Abstract: This work and its companion paper, Amon et al. (2021), present cosmic shear measurements and cosmological constraints from over 100 million source galaxies in the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year 3 data. We constrain the lensing amplitude parameter $S_8\equiv\sigma_8\sqrt{\Omega_\textrm{m}/0.3}$ at the 3% level in $\Lambda$CDM: $S_8=0.759^{+0.025}_{-0.023}$ (68% CL). Our constraint is at the 2% level when using angular scale cuts that are optimized for the $\Lambda$CDM analysis: $S_8=0.772^{+0.018}_{-0.017}$ (68% CL). With cosmic shear alone, we find no statistically significant constraint on the dark energy equation-of-state parameter at our present statistical power. We carry out our analysis blind, and compare our measurement with constraints from two other contemporary weak-lensing experiments: the Kilo-Degree Survey (KiDS) and Hyper-Suprime Camera Subaru Strategic Program (HSC). We additionally quantify the agreement between our data and external constraints from the Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB). Our DES Y3 result under the assumption of $\Lambda$CDM is found to be in statistical agreement with Planck 2018, although favors a lower $S_8$ than the CMB-inferred value by $2.3\sigma$ (a $p$-value of 0.02). This paper explores the robustness of these cosmic shear results to modeling of intrinsic alignments, the matter power spectrum and baryonic physics. We additionally explore the statistical preference of our data for intrinsic alignment models of different complexity. The fiducial cosmic shear model is tested using synthetic data, and we report no biases greater than 0.3$\sigma$ in the plane of $S_8\times\Omega_\textrm{m}$ caused by uncertainties in the theoretical models., Comment: Minor modifications, results unchanged. Matches version published in PRD. DES Y3 cosmology data products in https://des.ncsa.illinois.edu/releases/y3a2
Published: 2021
Full Text: View/download PDF

33. Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Covariance Modelling and its Impact on Parameter Estimation and Quality of Fit

Author: Friedrich, O., Andrade-Oliveira, F., Camacho, H., Alves, O., Rosenfeld, R., Sanchez, J., Fang, X., Eifler, T. F., Krause, E., Chang, C., Omori, Y., Amon, A., Baxter, E., Elvin-Poole, J., Huterer, D., Porredon, A., Prat, J., Terra, V., Troja, A., Alarcon, A., Bechtol, K., Bernstein, G. M., Buchs, R., Campos, A., Rosell, A. Carnero, Kind, M. Carrasco, Cawthon, R., Choi, A., Cordero, J., Crocce, M., Davis, C., DeRose, J., Diehl, H. T., Dodelson, S., Doux, C., Drlica-Wagner, A., Elsner, F., Everett, S., Fosalba, P., Gatti, M., Giannini, G., Gruen, D., Gruendl, R. A., Harrison, I., Hartley, W. G., Jain, B., Jarvis, M., MacCrann, N., McCullough, J., Muir, J., Myles, J., Pandey, S., Raveri, M., Roodman, A., Rodriguez-Monroy, M., Rykoff, E. S., Samuroff, S., Sánchez, C., Secco, L. F., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Sheldon, E., Troxel, M. A., Weaverdyck, N., Yanny, B., Aguena, M., Avila, S., Bacon, D., Bertin, E., Bhargava, S., Brooks, D., Burke, D. L., Carretero, J., Costanzi, M., da Costa, L. N., Pereira, M. E. S., De Vicente, J., Desai, S., Evrard, A. E., Ferrero, I., Frieman, J., García-Bellido, J., Gaztanaga, E., Gerdes, D. W., Giannantonio, T., Gschwend, J., Gutierrez, G., Hinton, S. R., Hollowood, D. L., Honscheid, K., James, D. J., Kuehn, K., Lahav, O., Lima, M., Maia, M. A. G., Menanteau, F., Miquel, R., Morgan, R., Palmese, A., Paz-Chinchón, F., Plazas, A. A., Sanchez, E., Scarpine, V., Serrano, S., Soares-Santos, M., Smith, M., Suchyta, E., Tarle, G., Thomas, D., To, C., Varga, T. N., Weller, J., and Wilkinson, R. D.
Subjects: Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Abstract: We describe and test the fiducial covariance matrix model for the combined 2-point function analysis of the Dark Energy Survey Year 3 (DES-Y3) dataset. Using a variety of new ansatzes for covariance modelling and testing we validate the assumptions and approximations of this model. These include the assumption of a Gaussian likelihood, the trispectrum contribution to the covariance, the impact of evaluating the model at a wrong set of parameters, the impact of masking and survey geometry, deviations from Poissonian shot-noise, galaxy weighting schemes and other, sub-dominant effects. We find that our covariance model is robust and that its approximations have little impact on goodness-of-fit and parameter estimation. The largest impact on best-fit figure-of-merit arises from the so-called $f_{\mathrm{sky}}$ approximation for dealing with finite survey area, which on average increases the $\chi^2$ between maximum posterior model and measurement by $3.7\%$ ($\Delta \chi^2 \approx 18.9$). Standard methods to go beyond this approximation fail for DES-Y3, but we derive an approximate scheme to deal with these features. For parameter estimation, our ignorance of the exact parameters at which to evaluate our covariance model causes the dominant effect. We find that it increases the scatter of maximum posterior values for $\Omega_m$ and $\sigma_8$ by about $3\%$ and for the dark energy equation of state parameter by about $5\%$., Comment: part of the DES year-3 combined 2-point function analysis; prepared for submission to MNRAS
Published: 2020
Full Text: View/download PDF

34. Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Cluster Abundances, Weak Lensing, and Galaxy Correlations

Author: To, C., Krause, E., Rozo, E., Wu, H., Gruen, D., Wechsler, R. H., Eifler, T. F., Rykoff, E. S., Costanzi, M., Becker, M. R., Bernstein, G. M., Blazek, J., Bocquet, S., Bridle, S. L., Cawthon, R., Choi, A., Crocce, M., Davis, C., DeRose, J., Drlica-Wagner, A., Elvin-Poole, J., Fang, X., Farahi, A., Friedrich, O., Gatti, M., Gaztanaga, E., Giannantonio, T., Hartley, W. G., Hoyle, B., Jarvis, M., MacCrann, N., McClintock, T., Miranda, V., Pereira, M. E. S., Park, Y., Porredon, A., Prat, J., Rau, M. M., Ross, A. J., Samuroff, S., Sánchez, C., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Sheldon, E., Troxel, M. A., Varga, T. N., Vielzeuf, P., Zhang, Y., Zuntz, J., Abbott, T. M. C., Aguena, M., Annis, J., Avila, S., Bertin, E., Bhargava, S., Brooks, D., Burke, D. L., Rosell, A. Carnero, Kind, M. Carrasco, Carretero, J., Chang, C., Conselice, C., da Costa, L. N., Davis, T. M., Desai, S., Diehl, H. T., Dietrich, J. P., Everett, S., Evrard, A. E., Ferrero, I., Flaugher, B., Fosalba, P., Frieman, J., García-Bellido, J., Gruendl, R. A., Gutierrez, G., Hinton, S. R., Hollowood, D. L., Huterer, D., James, D. J., Jeltema, T., Kron, R., Kuehn, K., Kuropatkin, N., Lima, M., Maia, M. A. G., Marshall, J. L., Menanteau, F., Miquel, R., Morgan, R., Muir, J., Myles, J., Palmese, A., Paz-Chinchón, F., Plazas, A. A., Romer, A. K., Roodman, A., Sanchez, E., Santiago, B., Scarpine, V., Serrano, S., Smith, M., Suchyta, E., Swanson, M. E. C., Tarle, G., Thomas, D., Tucker, D. L., Weller, J., and Wester, W.
Subjects: Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Abstract: Combining multiple observational probes is a powerful technique to provide robust and precise constraints on cosmological parameters. In this letter, we present the first joint analysis of cluster abundances and auto/cross correlations of three cosmic tracer fields measured from the first year data of the Dark Energy Survey: galaxy density, weak gravitational lensing shear, and cluster density split by optical richness. From a joint analysis of cluster abundances, three cluster cross-correlations, and auto correlations of galaxy density, we obtain $\Omega_{\rm{m}}=0.305^{+0.055}_{-0.038}$ and $\sigma_8=0.783^{+0.064}_{-0.054}$. This result is consistent with constraints from the DES-Y1 galaxy clustering and weak lensing two-point correlation functions for the flat $\nu\Lambda$CDM model. We thus combine cluster abundances and all two-point correlations from three cosmic tracer fields and find improved constraints on cosmological parameters as well as on the cluster observable--mass scaling relation. This analysis is an important advance in both optical cluster cosmology and multi-probe analyses of upcoming wide imaging surveys., Comment: 14 pages, 7 figures, 2 tables; submitted to PRL; comments are welcome
Published: 2020
Full Text: View/download PDF

35. Perturbation theory for modeling galaxy bias: validation with simulations of the Dark Energy Survey

Author: Pandey, S., Krause, E., Jain, B., MacCrann, N., Blazek, J., Crocce, M., DeRose, J., Fang, X., Ferrero, I., Friedrich, O., Aguena, M., Allam, S., Annis, J., Avila, S., Bernstein, G. M., Brooks, D., Burke, D. L., Rosell, A. Carnero, Kind, M. Carrasco, Carretero, J., Costanzi, M., da Costa, L. N., De Vicente, J., Desai, S., Elvin-Poole, J., Everett, S., Fosalba, P., Frieman, J., García-Bellido, J., Gruen, D., Gruendl, R. A., Gschwend, J., Gutierrez, G., Honscheid, K., Kuehn, K., Kuropatkin, N., Maia, M. A. G., Marshall, J. L., Menanteau, F., Miquel, R., Palmese, A., Paz-Chinchón, F., Plazas, A. A., Roodman, A., Sanchez, E., Scarpine, V., Schubnell, M., Serrano, S., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Smith, M., Soares-Santos, M., Suchyta, E., Swanson, M. E. C., Tarle, G., and Weller, J.
Subjects: Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics, Astrophysics - Astrophysics of Galaxies
Abstract: We describe perturbation theory (PT) models of galaxy bias for applications to photometric galaxy surveys. We model the galaxy-galaxy and galaxy-matter correlation functions in configuration space and validate against measurements from mock catalogs designed for the Dark Energy Survey (DES). We find that an effective PT model with five galaxy bias parameters provides a good description of the 3D correlation functions above scales of 4 Mpc/$h$ and $z < 1$. Our tests show that at the projected precision of the DES-Year 3 analysis, two of the non-linear bias parameters can be fixed to their co-evolution values, and a third (the $k^2$ term for higher derivative bias) set to zero. The agreement is typically at the 2 percent level over scales of interest, which is the statistical uncertainty of our simulation measurements. To achieve this level of agreement, our {\it fiducial} model requires using the full non-linear matter power spectrum (rather than the 1-loop PT one). We also measure the relationship between the non-linear and linear bias parameters and compare them to their expected co-evolution values. We use these tests to motivate the galaxy bias model and scale cuts for the cosmological analysis of the Dark Energy Survey; our conclusions are generally applicable to all photometric surveys., Comment: 19 pages, 14 figures, 1 table
Published: 2020
Full Text: View/download PDF

36. Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: cosmology with moments of weak lensing mass maps -- validation on simulations

Author: Gatti, M., Chang, C., Friedrich, O., Jain, B., Bacon, D., Crocce, M., DeRose, J., Ferrero, I., Fosalba, P., Gaztanaga, E., Gruen, D., Harrison, I., Jeffrey, N., MacCrann, N., McClintock, T., Secco, L., Whiteway, L., Abbott, T. M. C., Allam, S., Annis, J., Avila, S., Brooks, D., Buckley-Geer, E., Burke, D. L., Rosell, A. Carnero, Kind, M. Carrasco, Carretero, J., Cawthon, R., da Costa, L. N., De Vicente, J., Desai, S., Diehl, H. T., Doel, P., Eifler, T. F., Estrada, J., Everett, S., Evrard, A. E., Frieman, J., Garcia-Bellido, J., Gerdes, D. W., Gruendl, R. A., Gschwend, J., Gutierrez, G., James, D. J., Johnson, M. D., Krause, E., Kuehn, K., Lima, M., Maia, M. A. G., March, M., Marshall, J. L., Melchior, P., Menanteau, F., Miquel, R., Palmese, A., Paz-Chinchon, F., Plazas, A. A., Sanchez, C., Sanchez, E., Scarpine, V., Schubnell, M., Serrano, S., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Smith, M., Soares-Santos, M., Suchyta, E., Swanson, M. E. C., Tarle, G., Thomas, D., Troxel, M. A., Zuntz, J., and collaboration, the DES
Subjects: Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Abstract: We present a simulated cosmology analysis using the second and third moments of the weak lensing mass (convergence) maps. The analysis is geared towards the third year (Y3) data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES), but the methodology can be applied to other weak lensing data sets. The second moment, or variances, of the convergence as a function of smoothing scale contains information similar to standard shear 2-point statistics. The third moment, or the skewness, contains additional non-Gaussian information. We present the formalism for obtaining the convergence maps from the measured shear and for obtaining the second and third moments of these maps given partial sky coverage. We estimate the covariance matrix from a large suite of numerical simulations. We test our pipeline through a simulated likelihood analyses varying 5 cosmological parameters and 10 nuisance parameters. Our forecast shows that the combination of second and third moments provides a 1.5 percent constraint on $S_8 \equiv \sigma_8 (\Omega_{\rm m}/0.3)^{0.5}$ for DES Y3 data. This is 20 percent better than an analysis using a simulated DES Y3 shear 2-point statistics, owing to the non-Gaussian information captured by the inclusion of higher-order statistics. The methodology developed here can be applied to current and future weak lensing datasets to make use of information from non-Gaussianity in the cosmic density field and to improve constraints on cosmological parameters., Comment: submitted to MNRAS
Published: 2019
Full Text: View/download PDF

37. Cosmological lensing ratios with DES Y1, SPT and Planck

Author: Prat, J., Baxter, E. J., Shin, T., Sánchez, C., Chang, C., Jain, B., Miquel, R., Alarcon, A., Bacon, D., Bernstein, G. M., Cawthon, R., Crawford, T. M., Davis, C., De Vicente, J., Dodelson, S., Eifler, T. F., Friedrich, O., Gatti, M., Gruen, D., Hartley, W. G., Holder, G. P., Hoyle, B., Jarvis, M., Krause, E., MacCrann, N., Mawdsley, B., Nicola, A., Omori, Y., Pujol, A., Rau, M. M., Reichardt, C. L., Samuroff, S., Sheldon, E., Troxel, M. A., Vielzeuf, P., Zuntz, J., Abbott, T. M. C., Abdalla, F. B., Annis, J., Avila, S., Aylor, K., Benson, B. A., Bertin, E., Bleem, L. E., Brooks, D., Burke, D. L., Carlstrom, J. E., Kind, M. Carrasco, Carretero, J., Chang, C. L., Cho, H-M., Chown, R., Crites, A. T., Cunha, C. E., da Costa, L. N., Desai, S., Diehl, H. T., Dietrich, J. P., Dobbs, M. A., Doel, P., Everett, W. B., Evrard, A. E., Flaugher, B., Fosalba, P., García-Bellido, J., Gaztanaga, E., George, E. M., Gerdes, D. W., Giannantonio, T., Gruendl, R. A., Gschwend, J., Gutierrez, G., de Haan, T., Halverson, N. W., Harrington, N. L., Holzapfel, W. L., Honscheid, K., Hou, Z., Hrubes, J. D., James, D. J., Jeltema, T., Knox, L., Kron, R., Kuehn, K., Kuropatkin, N., Lahav, O., Lee, A. T., Leitch, E. M., Lima, M., Luong-Van, D., Maia, M. A. G., Manzotti, A., Marrone, D. P., Marshall, J. L., McMahon, J. J., Melchior, P., Menanteau, F., Meyer, S. S., Miller, C. J., Mocanu, L. M., Mohr, J. J., Natoli, T., Padin, S., Plazas, A. A., Pryke, C., Romer, A. K., Roodman, A., Ruhl, J. E., Rykoff, E. S., Sanchez, E., Sayre, J. T., Scarpine, V., Schaffer, K. K., Serrano, S., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Shirokoff, E., Simard, G., Smith, M., Soares-Santos, M., Sobreira, F., Staniszewski, Z., Stark, A. A., Story, K. T., Suchyta, E., Swanson, M. E. C., Tarle, G., Thomas, D., Vanderlinde, K., Vieira, J. D., Vikram, V., Walker, A. R., Weller, J., Williamson, R., and Zahn, O.
Subjects: Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Abstract: Correlations between tracers of the matter density field and gravitational lensing are sensitive to the evolution of the matter power spectrum and the expansion rate across cosmic time. Appropriately defined ratios of such correlation functions, on the other hand, depend only on the angular diameter distances to the tracer objects and to the gravitational lensing source planes. Because of their simple cosmological dependence, such ratios can exploit available signal-to-noise down to small angular scales, even where directly modeling the correlation functions is difficult. We present a measurement of lensing ratios using galaxy position and lensing data from the Dark Energy Survey, and CMB lensing data from the South Pole Telescope and Planck, obtaining the highest precision lensing ratio measurements to date. Relative to the concordance $\Lambda$CDM model, we find a best fit lensing ratio amplitude of $A = 1.1 \pm 0.1$. We use the ratio measurements to generate cosmological constraints, focusing on the curvature parameter. We demonstrate that photometrically selected galaxies can be used to measure lensing ratios, and argue that future lensing ratio measurements with data from a combination of LSST and Stage-4 CMB experiments can be used to place interesting cosmological constraints, even after considering the systematic uncertainties associated with photometric redshift and galaxy shear estimation., Comment: 17 pages, 11 figures
Published: 2018
Full Text: View/download PDF

38. Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Joint Analysis of Galaxy Clustering, Galaxy Lensing, and CMB Lensing Two-point Functions

Author: Abbott, T. M. C., Abdalla, F. B., Alarcon, A., Allam, S., Annis, J., Avila, S., Aylor, K., Banerji, M., Banik, N., Baxter, E. J., Bechtol, K., Becker, M. R., Benson, B. A., Bernstein, G. M., Bertin, E., Bianchini, F., Blazek, J., Bleem, L., Bleem, L. E., Bridle, S. L., Brooks, D., Buckley-Geer, E., Burke, D. L., Carlstrom, J. E., Rosell, A. Carnero, Kind, M. Carrasco, Carretero, J., Castander, F. J., Cawthon, R., Chang, C., Chang, C. L., Cho, H-M., Choi, A., Chown, R., Crawford, T. M., Crites, A. T., Crocce, M., Cunha, C. E., D'Andrea, C. B., da Costa, L. N., Davis, C., de Haan, T., DeRose, J., Desai, S., De Vicente, J., Diehl, H. T., Dietrich, J. P., Dobbs, M. A., Dodelson, S., Doel, P., Drlica-Wagner, A., Eifler, T. F., Elvin-Poole, J., Everett, W. B., Flaugher, B., Fosalba, P., Friedrich, O., Frieman, J., García-Bellido, J., Gatti, M., Gaztanaga, E., George, E. M., Gerdes, D. W., Giannantonio, T., Gruen, D., Gruendl, R. A., Gschwend, J., Gutierrez, G., Halverson, N. W., Harrington, N. L., Hartley, W. G., Holder, G. P., Hollowood, D. L., Holzapfel, W. L., Honscheid, K., Hou, Z., Hoyle, B., Hrubes, J. D., Huterer, D., Jain, B., James, D. J., Jarvis, M., Jeltema, T., Johnson, M. W. G., Johnson, M. D., Kent, S., Kirk, D., Knox, L., Kokron, N., Krause, E., Kuehn, K., Lahav, O., Lee, A. T., Leitch, E. M., Li, T. S., Lima, M., Lin, H., Luong-Van, D., MacCrann, N., Maia, M. A. G., Manzotti, A., Marrone, D. P., Marshall, J. L., Martini, P., McMahon, J. J., Menanteau, F., Meyer, S. S., Miquel, R., Mocanu, L. M., Mohr, J. J., Muir, J., Natoli, T., Nicola, A., Nord, B., Omori, Y., Padin, S., Pandey, S., Plazas, A. A., Porredon, A., Prat, J., Pryke, C., Rau, M. M., Reichardt, C. L., Rollins, R. P., Romer, A. K., Roodman, A., Ross, A. J., Rozo, E., Ruhl, J. E., Rykoff, E. S., Samuroff, S., Sánchez, C., Sanchez, E., Sayre, J. T., Scarpine, V., Schaffer, K. K., Secco, L. F., Serrano, S., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Sheldon, E., Shirokoff, E., Simard, G., Smith, M., Soares-Santos, M., Sobreira, F., Staniszewski, Z., Stark, A. A., Story, K. T., Suchyta, E., Swanson, M. E. C., Tarle, G., Thomas, D., Troxel, M. A., Tucker, D. L., Vanderlinde, K., Vieira, J. D., Vielzeuf, P., Vikram, V., Walker, A. R., Wechsler, R. H., Weller, J., Williamson, R., Wu, W. L. K., Yanny, B., Zahn, O., Zhang, Y., and Zuntz, J.
Subjects: Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Abstract: We perform a joint analysis of the auto and cross-correlations between three cosmic fields: the galaxy density field, the galaxy weak lensing shear field, and the cosmic microwave background (CMB) weak lensing convergence field. These three fields are measured using roughly 1300 sq. deg. of overlapping optical imaging data from first year observations of the Dark Energy Survey and millimeter-wave observations of the CMB from both the South Pole Telescope Sunyaev-Zel'dovich survey and Planck. We present cosmological constraints from the joint analysis of the two-point correlation functions between galaxy density and galaxy shear with CMB lensing. We test for consistency between these measurements and the DES-only two-point function measurements, finding no evidence for inconsistency in the context of flat $\Lambda$CDM cosmological models. Performing a joint analysis of five of the possible correlation functions between these fields (excluding only the CMB lensing autospectrum) yields $S_{8}\equiv \sigma_8\sqrt{\Omega_{\rm m}/0.3} = 0.782^{+0.019}_{-0.025}$ and $\Omega_{\rm m}=0.260^{+0.029}_{-0.019}$. We test for consistency between these five correlation function measurements and the Planck-only measurement of the CMB lensing autospectrum, again finding no evidence for inconsistency in the context of flat $\Lambda$CDM models. Combining constraints from all six two-point functions yields $S_{8}=0.776^{+0.014}_{-0.021}$ and $\Omega_{\rm m}= 0.271^{+0.022}_{-0.016}$. These results provide a powerful test and confirmation of the results from the first year DES joint-probes analysis., Comment: 20 pages, 7 figures
Published: 2018
Full Text: View/download PDF

39. Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: tomographic cross-correlations between DES galaxies and CMB lensing from SPT+Planck

Author: Omori, Y., Giannantonio, T., Porredon, A., Baxter, E., Chang, C., Crocce, M., Fosalba, P., Alarcon, A., Banik, N., Blazek, J., Bleem, L. E., Bridle, S. L., Cawthon, R., Choi, A., Chown, R., Crawford, T., Dodelson, S., Drlica-Wagner, A., Eifler, T. F., Elvin-Poole, J., Friedrich, O., Gruen, D., Holder, G. P., Huterer, D., Jain, B., Jarvis, M., Kirk, D., Kokron, N., Krause, E., MacCrann, N., Muir, J., Prat, J., Reichardt, C. L., Ross, A. J., Rozo, E., Rykoff, E. S., Sánchez, C., Secco, L. F., Simard, G., Wechsler, R. H., Zuntz, J., Abbott, T. M. C., Abdalla, F. B., Allam, S., Avila, S., Aylor, K., Benson, B. A., Bernstein, G. M., Bertin, E., Bianchini, F., Brooks, D., Buckley-Geer, E., Burke, D. L., Carlstrom, J. E., Rosell, A. Carnero, Kind, M. Carrasco, Carretero, J., Castander, F. J., Chang, C. L., Cho, H-M., Crites, A. T., Cunha, C. E., da Costa, L. N., de Haan, T., Davis, C., De Vicente, J., Desai, S., Diehl, H. T., Dietrich, J. P., Dobbs, M. A., Everett, W. B., Doel, P., Estrada, J., Flaugher, B., Frieman, J., García-Bellido, J., Gaztanaga, E., Gerdes, D. W., George, E. M., Gruendl, R. A., Gschwend, J., Gutierrez, G., Halverson, N. W., Harrington, N. L., Hartley, W. G., Hollowood, D. L., Holzapfel, W. L., Honscheid, K., Hou, Z., Hoyle, B., Hrubes, J. D., James, D. J., Jeltema, T., Kuehn, K., Kuropatkin, N., Lee, A. T., Leitch, E. M., Lima, M., Luong-Van, D., Manzotti, A., Marrone, D. P., Marshall, J. L., McMahon, J. J., Melchior, P., Menanteau, F., Meyer, S. S., Miller, C. J., Miquel, R., Mocanu, L. M., Mohr, J. J., Natoli, T., Padin, S., Plazas, A. A., Pryke, C., Romer, A. K., Roodman, A., Ruhl, J. E., Sanchez, E., Scarpine, V., Schaffer, K. K., Schubnell, M., Serrano, S., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Shirokoff, E., Smith, M., Soares-Santos, M., Sobreira, F., Staniszewski, Z., Stark, A. A., Story, K. T., Suchyta, E., Swanson, M. E. C., Tarle, G., Thomas, D., Troxel, M. A., Vanderlinde, K., Vieira, J. D., Walker, A. R., Wu, W. L. K., and Zahn, O.
Subjects: Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Abstract: We measure the cross-correlation between redMaGiC galaxies selected from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) Year-1 data and gravitational lensing of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) reconstructed from South Pole Telescope (SPT) and Planck data over 1289 sq. deg. When combining measurements across multiple galaxy redshift bins spanning the redshift range of $0.15
Published: 2018
Full Text: View/download PDF

40. Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cross-correlation between DES Y1 galaxy weak lensing and SPT+Planck CMB weak lensing

Author: Omori, Y., Baxter, E., Chang, C., Kirk, D., Alarcon, A., Bernstein, G. M., Bleem, L. E., Cawthon, R., Choi, A., Chown, R., Crawford, T. M., Davis, C., De Vicente, J., DeRose, J., Dodelson, S., Eifler, T. F., Fosalba, P., Friedrich, O., Gatti, M., Gaztanaga, E., Giannantonio, T., Gruen, D., Hartley, W. G., Holder, G. P., Hoyle, B., Huterer, D., Jain, B., Jarvis, M., Krause, E., MacCrann, N., Miquel, R., Prat, J., Rau, M. M., Reichardt, C. L., Rozo, E., Samuroff, S., Sánchez, C., Secco, L. F., Sheldon, E., Simard, G., Troxel, M. A., Vielzeuf, P., Wechsler, R. H., Zuntz, J., Abbott, T. M. C., Abdalla, F. B., Allam, S., Annis, J., Avila, S., Aylor, K., Benson, B. A., Bertin, E., Bridle, S. L., Brooks, D., Burke, D. L., Carlstrom, J. E., Rosell, A. Carnero, Kind, M. Carrasco, Carretero, J., Castander, F. J., Chang, C. L., Cho, H-M., Crites, A. T., Crocce, M., Cunha, C. E., da Costa, L. N., de Haan, T., Desai, S., Diehl, H. T., Dietrich, J. P., Dobbs, M. A., Everett, W. B., Fernandez, E., Flaugher, B., Frieman, J., García-Bellido, J., George, E. M., Gruendl, R. A., Gutierrez, G., Halverson, N. W., Harrington, N. L., Hollowood, D. L., Honscheid, K., Holzapfel, W. L., Hou, Z., Hrubes, J. D., James, D. J., Jeltema, T., Kuehn, K., Kuropatkin, N., Lima, M., Lin, H., Lee, A. T., Leitch, E. M., Luong-Van, D., Maia, M. A. G., Manzotti, A., Marrone, D. P., Marshall, J. L., Martini, P., McMahon, J. J., Melchior, P., Menanteau, F., Meyer, S. S., Mocanu, L. M., Mohr, J. J., Natoli, T., Ogando, R. L. C., Padin, S., Plazas, A. A., Pryke, C., Romer, A. K., Roodman, A., Ruhl, J. E., Rykoff, E. S., Sanchez, E., Scarpine, V., Schaffer, K. K., Schindler, R., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Shirokoff, E., Smith, M., Smith, R. C., Soares-Santos, M., Sobreira, F., Staniszewski, Z., Stark, A. A., Story, K. T., Suchyta, E., Swanson, M. E. C., Tarle, G., Thomas, D., Vanderlinde, K., Vieira, J. D., Vikram, V., Walker, A. R., Weller, J., Williamson, R., Wu, W. L. K., and Zahn, O.
Subjects: Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Abstract: We cross-correlate galaxy weak lensing measurements from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) year-one (Y1) data with a cosmic microwave background (CMB) weak lensing map derived from South Pole Telescope (SPT) and Planck data, with an effective overlapping area of 1289 deg$^{2}$. With the combined measurements from four source galaxy redshift bins, we reject the hypothesis of no lensing with a significance of $10.8\sigma$. When employing angular scale cuts, this significance is reduced to $6.8\sigma$, which remains the highest signal-to-noise measurement of its kind to date. We fit the amplitude of the correlation functions while fixing the cosmological parameters to a fiducial $\Lambda$CDM model, finding $A = 0.99 \pm 0.17$. We additionally use the correlation function measurements to constrain shear calibration bias, obtaining constraints that are consistent with previous DES analyses. Finally, when performing a cosmological analysis under the $\Lambda$CDM model, we obtain the marginalized constraints of $\Omega_{\rm m}=0.261^{+0.070}_{-0.051}$ and $S_{8}\equiv \sigma_{8}\sqrt{\Omega_{\rm m}/0.3} = 0.660^{+0.085}_{-0.100}$. These measurements are used in a companion work that presents cosmological constraints from the joint analysis of two-point functions among galaxies, galaxy shears, and CMB lensing using DES, SPT and Planck data., Comment: 15 pages, 6 figures
Published: 2018
Full Text: View/download PDF

41. Survey geometry and the internal consistency of recent cosmic shear measurements

Author: Troxel, M. A., Krause, E., Chang, C., Eifler, T. F., Friedrich, O., Gruen, D., MacCrann, N., Chen, A., Davis, C., DeRose, J., Dodelson, S., Gatti, M., Hoyle, B., Huterer, D., Jarvis, M., Lacasa, F., Peiris, H. V., Prat, J., Samuroff, S., Sánchez, C., Sheldon, E., Vielzeuf, P., Wang, M., Zuntz, J., Abdalla, F. B., Allam, S., Annis, J., Avila, S., Bertin, E., Brooks, D., Burke, D. L., Rosell, A. Carnero, Kind, M. Carrasco, Carretero, J., Crocce, M., Cunha, C. E., D'Andrea, C. B., da Costa, L. N., De Vicente, J., Diehl, H. T., Doel, P., Evrard, A. E., Flaugher, B., Fosalba, P., Frieman, J., García-Bellido, J., Gaztanaga, E., Gerdes, D. W., Gruendl, R. A., Gschwend, J., Gutierrez, G., Hartley, W. G., Hollowood, D. L., Honscheid, K., James, D. J., Kirk, D., Kuehn, K., Kuropatkin, N., Li, T. S., Lima, M., March, M., Menanteau, F., Miquel, R., Mohr, J. J., Ogando, R. L. C., Plazas, A. A., Roodman, A., Sanchez, E., Scarpine, V., Schindler, R., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Smith, M., Soares-Santos, M., Sobreira, F., Suchyta, E., Swanson, M. E. C., Thomas, D., Walker, A. R., and Wechsler, R. H.
Subjects: Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Abstract: We explore the impact of an update to the typical approximation for the shape noise term in the analytic covariance matrix for cosmic shear experiments that assumes the absence of survey boundary and mask effects. We present an exact expression for the number of galaxy pairs in this term based on the the survey mask, which leads to more than a factor of three increase in the shape noise on the largest measured scales for the Kilo-Degree Survey (KIDS-450) real-space cosmic shear data. We compare the result of this analytic expression to several alternative methods for measuring the shape noise from the data and find excellent agreement. This update to the covariance resolves any internal model tension evidenced by the previously large cosmological best-fit $\chi^2$ for the KiDS-450 cosmic shear data. The best-fit $\chi^2$ is reduced from 161 to 121 for 118 degrees of freedom. We also apply a correction to how the multiplicative shear calibration uncertainty is included in the covariance. This change, along with a previously known update to the reported effective angular values of the data vector, jointly shift the inferred amplitude of the correlation function to higher values. We find that this improves agreement of the KiDS-450 cosmic shear results with Dark Energy Survey Year 1 and Planck results., Comment: 7 pages, 2 figures; matches accepted version
Published: 2018
Full Text: View/download PDF

42. Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Methodology and Projections for Joint Analysis of Galaxy Clustering, Galaxy Lensing, and CMB Lensing Two-point Functions

Author: Baxter, E. J., Omori, Y., Chang, C., Giannantonio, T., Kirk, D., Krause, E., Blazek, J., Bleem, L., Choi, A., Crawford, T. M., Dodelson, S., Eifler, T. F., Friedrich, O., Gruen, D., Holder, G. P., Jain, B., Jarvis, M., MacCrann, N., Nicola, A., Pandey, S., Prat, J., Reichardt, C. L., Samuroff, S., Sánchez, C., Secco, L. F., Sheldon, E., Troxel, M. A., Zuntz, J., Abbott, T. M. C., Abdalla, F. B., Annis, J., Avila, S., Bechtol, K., Benson, B. A., Bertin, E., Brooks, D., Buckley-Geer, E., Burke, D. L., Rosell, A. Carnero, Kind, M. Carrasco, Carretero, J., Castander, F. J., Cawthon, R., Cunha, C. E., D'Andrea, C. B., da Costa, L. N., Davis, C., De Vicente, J., DePoy, D. L., Diehl, H. T., Doel, P., Estrada, J., Evrard, A. E., Flaugher, B., Fosalba, P., Frieman, J., García-Bellido, J., Gaztanaga, E., Gerdes, D. W., Gruendl, R. A., Gschwend, J., Gutierrez, G., Hartley, W. G., Hollowood, D., Hoyle, B., James, D. J., Kent, S., Kuehn, K., Kuropatkin, N., Lahav, O., Lima, M., Maia, M. A. G., March, M., Marshall, J. L., Melchior, P., Menanteau, F., Miquel, R., Plazas, A. A., Roodman, A., Rykoff, E. S., Sanchez, E., Schindler, R., Schubnell, M., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Smith, M., Smith, R. C., Soares-Santos, M., Sobreira, F., Suchyta, E., Swanson, M. E. C., Tarle, G., Walker, A. R., Wu, W. L. K., and Weller, J.
Subjects: Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Abstract: Optical imaging surveys measure both the galaxy density and the gravitational lensing-induced shear fields across the sky. Recently, the Dark Energy Survey (DES) collaboration used a joint fit to two-point correlations between these observables to place tight constraints on cosmology (DES Collaboration et al. 2017). In this work, we develop the methodology to extend the DES year one joint probes analysis to include cross-correlations of the optical survey observables with gravitational lensing of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) as measured by the South Pole Telescope (SPT) and Planck. Using simulated analyses, we show how the resulting set of five two-point functions increases the robustness of the cosmological constraints to systematic errors in galaxy lensing shear calibration. Additionally, we show that contamination of the SPT+Planck CMB lensing map by the thermal Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect is a potentially large source of systematic error for two-point function analyses, but show that it can be reduced to acceptable levels in our analysis by masking clusters of galaxies and imposing angular scale cuts on the two-point functions. The methodology developed here will be applied to the analysis of data from the DES, the SPT, and Planck in a companion work., Comment: 21 pages, 11 figures; matches version resubmitted to journal
Published: 2018
Full Text: View/download PDF

43. Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: galaxy mock catalogues for BAO

Author: Avila, S., Crocce, M., Ross, A. J., García-Bellido, J., Percival, W. J., Camacho, N. Banik H., Kokron, N., Chan, K. C., Andrade-Oliveira, F., Gomes, R., Gomes, D., Lima, M., Rosenfeld, R., Salvador, A. I., Friedrich, O., Abdalla, F. B., Annis, J., Benoit-Lévy, A., Bertin, E., Brooks, D., Kind, M. Carrasco, Carretero, J., Castander, F. J., Cunha, C. E., da Costa, L. N., Davis, C., De Vicente, J., Doel, P., Fosalba, P., Frieman, J., Gerdes, D. W., Gruen, D., Gruendl, R. A., Gutierrez, G., Hartley, W. G., Hollowood, D., Honscheid, K., James, D. J., Kuehn, K., Kuropatkin, N., Miquel, R., Plazas, A. A., Sanchez, E., Scarpine, V., Schindler, R., Schubnell, M., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Smith, M., Sobreira, F., Suchyt, E., Swanson, M. E. C., Tarle, G., Thomas, D., and Walker, A. R.
Subjects: Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Abstract: Mock catalogues are a crucial tool in the analysis of galaxy surveys data, both for the accurate computation of covariance matrices, and for the optimisation of analysis methodology and validation of data sets. In this paper, we present a set of 1800 galaxy mock catalogues designed to match the Dark Energy Survey Year-1 BAO sample (Crocce et al. 2017) in abundance, observational volume, redshift distribution and uncertainty, and redshift dependent clustering. The simulated samples were built upon HALOGEN (Avila et al. 2015) halo catalogues, based on a $2LPT$ density field with an exponential bias. For each of them, a lightcone is constructed by the superposition of snapshots in the redshift range $0.45
Published: 2017
Full Text: View/download PDF

44. Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cross-correlation between Dark Energy Survey Y1 galaxy weak lensing and South Pole Telescope+Planck CMB weak lensing

Author: Omori, Y, Baxter, EJ, Chang, C, Kirk, D, Alarcon, A, Bernstein, GM, Bleem, LE, Cawthon, R, Choi, A, Chown, R, Crawford, TM, Davis, C, De Vicente, J, DeRose, J, Dodelson, S, Eifler, TF, Fosalba, P, Friedrich, O, Gatti, M, Gaztanaga, E, Giannantonio, T, Gruen, D, Hartley, WG, Holder, GP, Hoyle, B, Huterer, D, Jain, B, Jarvis, M, Krause, E, MacCrann, N, Miquel, R, Prat, J, Rau, MM, Reichardt, CL, Rozo, E, Samuroff, S, Sánchez, C, Secco, LF, Sheldon, E, Simard, G, Troxel, MA, Vielzeuf, P, Wechsler, RH, Zuntz, J, Abbott, TMC, Abdalla, FB, Allam, S, Annis, J, Avila, S, Aylor, K, Benson, BA, Bertin, E, Bridle, SL, Brooks, D, Burke, DL, Carlstrom, JE, Rosell, A Carnero, Kind, M Carrasco, Carretero, J, Castander, FJ, Chang, CL, Cho, H-M, Crites, AT, Crocce, M, Cunha, CE, da Costa, LN, de Haan, T, Desai, S, Diehl, HT, Dietrich, JP, Dobbs, MA, Everett, WB, Fernandez, E, Flaugher, B, Frieman, J, García-Bellido, J, George, EM, Gruendl, RA, Gutierrez, G, Halverson, NW, Harrington, NL, Hollowood, DL, Honscheid, K, Holzapfel, WL, Hou, Z, Hrubes, JD, James, DJ, Jeltema, T, Kuehn, K, Kuropatkin, N, Lima, M, Lin, H, Lee, AT, Leitch, EM, Luong-Van, D, Maia, MAG, Manzotti, A, Marrone, DP, Marshall, JL, and Martini, P
Subjects: Particle and High Energy Physics, Physical Sciences, astro-ph.CO
Abstract: We cross-correlate galaxy weak lensing measurements from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) year-one data with a cosmic microwave background (CMB) weak lensing map derived from South Pole Telescope (SPT) and Planck data, with an effective overlapping area of 1289 deg2. With the combined measurements from four source galaxy redshift bins, we obtain a detection significance of 5.8σ. We fit the amplitude of the correlation functions while fixing the cosmological parameters to a fiducial ΛCDM model, finding A=0.99±0.17. We additionally use the correlation function measurements to constrain shear calibration bias, obtaining constraints that are consistent with previous DES analyses. Finally, when performing a cosmological analysis under the ΛCDM model, we obtain the marginalized constraints of ωm=0.261-0.051+0.070 and S8σ8ωm/0.3=0.660-0.100+0.085. These measurements are used in a companion work that presents cosmological constraints from the joint analysis of two-point functions among galaxies, galaxy shears, and CMB lensing using DES, SPT, and Planck data.
Published: 2019

45. Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Tomographic cross-correlations between Dark Energy Survey galaxies and CMB lensing from South Pole Telescope+Planck

Author: Omori, Y, Giannantonio, T, Porredon, A, Baxter, EJ, Chang, C, Crocce, M, Fosalba, P, Alarcon, A, Banik, N, Blazek, J, Bleem, LE, Bridle, SL, Cawthon, R, Choi, A, Chown, R, Crawford, T, Dodelson, S, Drlica-Wagner, A, Eifler, TF, Elvin-Poole, J, Friedrich, O, Gruen, D, Holder, GP, Huterer, D, Jain, B, Jarvis, M, Kirk, D, Kokron, N, Krause, E, MacCrann, N, Muir, J, Prat, J, Reichardt, CL, Ross, AJ, Rozo, E, Rykoff, ES, Sánchez, C, Secco, LF, Simard, G, Wechsler, RH, Zuntz, J, Abbott, TMC, Abdalla, FB, Allam, S, Avila, S, Aylor, K, Benson, BA, Bernstein, GM, Bertin, E, Bianchini, F, Brooks, D, Buckley-Geer, E, Burke, DL, Carlstrom, JE, Rosell, A Carnero, Kind, M Carrasco, Carretero, J, Castander, FJ, Chang, CL, Cho, H-M, Crites, AT, Cunha, CE, da Costa, LN, de Haan, T, Davis, C, De Vicente, J, Desai, S, Diehl, HT, Dietrich, JP, Dobbs, MA, Everett, WB, Doel, P, Estrada, J, Flaugher, B, Frieman, J, García-Bellido, J, Gaztanaga, E, Gerdes, DW, George, EM, Gruendl, RA, Gschwend, J, Gutierrez, G, Halverson, NW, Harrington, NL, Hartley, WG, Hollowood, DL, Holzapfel, WL, Honscheid, K, Hou, Z, Hoyle, B, Hrubes, JD, James, DJ, Jeltema, T, Kuehn, K, Kuropatkin, N, Lee, AT, Leitch, EM, Lima, M, Luong-Van, D, and Manzotti, A
Subjects: Particle and High Energy Physics, Physical Sciences, astro-ph.CO
Abstract: We measure the cross-correlation between redMaGiC galaxies selected from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) year 1 data and gravitational lensing of the cosmic microwave background (CMB) reconstructed from South Pole Telescope (SPT) and Planck data over 1289 deg2. When combining measurements across multiple galaxy redshift bins spanning the redshift range of 0.15
Published: 2019

46. Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cross-correlation between Dark Energy Survey Y1 galaxy weak lensing and South Pole Telescope +Planck CMB weak lensing

Author: Omori, Y, Baxter, EJ, Chang, C, Kirk, D, Alarcon, A, Bernstein, GM, Bleem, LE, Cawthon, R, Choi, A, Chown, R, Crawford, TM, Davis, C, De Vicente, J, Derose, J, Dodelson, S, Eifler, TF, Fosalba, P, Friedrich, O, Gatti, M, Gaztanaga, E, Giannantonio, T, Gruen, D, Hartley, WG, Holder, GP, Hoyle, B, Huterer, D, Jain, B, Jarvis, M, Krause, E, Maccrann, N, Miquel, R, Prat, J, Rau, MM, Reichardt, CL, Rozo, E, Samuroff, S, Sánchez, C, Secco, LF, Sheldon, E, Simard, G, Troxel, MA, Vielzeuf, P, Wechsler, RH, Zuntz, J, Abbott, TMC, Abdalla, FB, Allam, S, Annis, J, Avila, S, Aylor, K, Benson, BA, Bertin, E, Bridle, SL, Brooks, D, Burke, DL, Carlstrom, JE, Carnero Rosell, A, Carrasco Kind, M, Carretero, J, Castander, FJ, Chang, CL, Cho, HM, Crites, AT, Crocce, M, Cunha, CE, Da Costa, LN, De Haan, T, Desai, S, Diehl, HT, Dietrich, JP, Dobbs, MA, Everett, WB, Fernandez, E, Flaugher, B, Frieman, J, García-Bellido, J, George, EM, Gruendl, RA, Gutierrez, G, Halverson, NW, Harrington, NL, Hollowood, DL, Honscheid, K, Holzapfel, WL, Hou, Z, Hrubes, JD, James, DJ, Jeltema, T, Kuehn, K, Kuropatkin, N, Lima, M, Lin, H, Lee, AT, Leitch, EM, Luong-Van, D, Maia, MAG, Manzotti, A, Marrone, DP, and Marshall, JL
Subjects: astro-ph.CO
Abstract: We cross-correlate galaxy weak lensing measurements from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) year-one data with a cosmic microwave background (CMB) weak lensing map derived from South Pole Telescope (SPT) and Planck data, with an effective overlapping area of 1289 deg2. With the combined measurements from four source galaxy redshift bins, we obtain a detection significance of 5.8σ. We fit the amplitude of the correlation functions while fixing the cosmological parameters to a fiducial ΛCDM model, finding A=0.99±0.17. We additionally use the correlation function measurements to constrain shear calibration bias, obtaining constraints that are consistent with previous DES analyses. Finally, when performing a cosmological analysis under the ΛCDM model, we obtain the marginalized constraints of ωm=0.261-0.051+0.070 and S8σ8ωm/0.3=0.660-0.100+0.085. These measurements are used in a companion work that presents cosmological constraints from the joint analysis of two-point functions among galaxies, galaxy shears, and CMB lensing using DES, SPT, and Planck data.
Published: 2019

47. Dark Energy Survey year 1 results: Joint analysis of galaxy clustering, galaxy lensing, and CMB lensing two-point functions

Author: Abbott, TMC, Abdalla, FB, Alarcon, A, Allam, S, Annis, J, Avila, S, Aylor, K, Banerji, M, Banik, N, Baxter, EJ, Bechtol, K, Becker, MR, Benson, BA, Bernstein, GM, Bertin, E, Bianchini, F, Blazek, J, Bleem, LE, Bridle, SL, Brooks, D, Buckley-Geer, E, Burke, DL, Carlstrom, JE, Rosell, A Carnero, Kind, M Carrasco, Carretero, J, Castander, FJ, Cawthon, R, Chang, C, Chang, CL, Cho, H-M, Choi, A, Chown, R, Crawford, TM, Crites, AT, Crocce, M, Cunha, CE, D'Andrea, CB, da Costa, LN, Davis, C, de Haan, T, DeRose, J, Desai, S, De Vicente, J, Diehl, HT, Dietrich, JP, Dobbs, MA, Dodelson, S, Doel, P, Drlica-Wagner, A, Eifler, TF, Elvin-Poole, J, Everett, WB, Flaugher, B, Fosalba, P, Friedrich, O, Frieman, J, Garcia-Bellido, J, Gatti, M, Gaztanaga, E, George, EM, Gerdes, DW, Giannantonio, T, Gruen, D, Gruendl, RA, Gschwend, J, Gutierrez, G, Halverson, NW, Harrington, NL, Hartley, WG, Holder, GP, Hollowood, DL, Holzapfel, WL, Honscheid, K, Hou, Z, Hoyle, B, Hrubes, JD, Huterer, D, Jain, B, James, DJ, Jarvis, M, Jeltema, T, Johnson, MWG, Johnson, MD, Kent, S, Kirk, D, Knox, L, Kokron, N, Krause, E, Kuehn, K, Lahav, O, Lee, AT, Leitch, EM, Li, TS, Lima, M, Lin, H, Luong-Van, D, MacCrann, N, Maia, MAG, and Manzotti, A
Subjects: astro-ph.CO
Abstract: We perform a joint analysis of the auto and cross-correlations between threecosmic fields: the galaxy density field, the galaxy weak lensing shear field,and the cosmic microwave background (CMB) weak lensing convergence field. Thesethree fields are measured using roughly 1300 sq. deg. of overlapping opticalimaging data from first year observations of the Dark Energy Survey andmillimeter-wave observations of the CMB from both the South Pole TelescopeSunyaev-Zel'dovich survey and Planck. We present cosmological constraints fromthe joint analysis of the two-point correlation functions between galaxydensity and galaxy shear with CMB lensing. We test for consistency betweenthese measurements and the DES-only two-point function measurements, finding noevidence for inconsistency in the context of flat $\Lambda$CDM cosmologicalmodels. Performing a joint analysis of five of the possible correlationfunctions between these fields (excluding only the CMB lensing autospectrum)yields $S_{8}\equiv \sigma_8\sqrt{\Omega_{\rm m}/0.3} =0.782^{+0.019}_{-0.025}$ and $\Omega_{\rm m}=0.260^{+0.029}_{-0.019}$. We testfor consistency between these five correlation function measurements and thePlanck-only measurement of the CMB lensing autospectrum, again finding noevidence for inconsistency in the context of flat $\Lambda$CDM models.Combining constraints from all six two-point functions yields$S_{8}=0.776^{+0.014}_{-0.021}$ and $\Omega_{\rm m}= 0.271^{+0.022}_{-0.016}$.These results provide a powerful test and confirmation of the results from thefirst year DES joint-probes analysis.
Published: 2019

48. Cosmological lensing ratios with DES Y1, SPT, and Planck

Author: Prat, J, Baxter, E, Shin, T, Sánchez, C, Chang, C, Jain, B, Miquel, R, Alarcon, A, Bacon, D, Bernstein, GM, Cawthon, R, Crawford, TM, Davis, C, De Vicente, J, Dodelson, S, Eifler, TF, Friedrich, O, Gatti, M, Gruen, D, Hartley, WG, Holder, GP, Hoyle, B, Jarvis, M, Krause, E, MacCrann, N, Mawdsley, B, Nicola, A, Omori, Y, Pujol, A, Rau, MM, Reichardt, CL, Samuroff, S, Sheldon, E, Troxel, MA, Vielzeuf, P, Zuntz, J, Abbott, TMC, Abdalla, FB, Annis, J, Avila, S, Aylor, K, Benson, BA, Bertin, E, Bleem, LE, Brooks, D, Burke, DL, Carlstrom, JE, Kind, M Carrasco, Carretero, J, Chang, CL, Cho, H-M, Chown, R, Crites, AT, Cunha, CE, da Costa, LN, Desai, S, Diehl, HT, Dietrich, JP, Dobbs, MA, Doel, P, Everett, WB, Evrard, AE, Flaugher, B, Fosalba, P, García-Bellido, J, Gaztanaga, E, George, EM, Gerdes, DW, Giannantonio, T, Gruendl, RA, Gschwend, J, Gutierrez, G, de Haan, T, Halverson, NW, Harrington, NL, Holzapfel, WL, Honscheid, K, Hou, Z, Hrubes, JD, James, DJ, Jeltema, T, Knox, L, Kron, R, Kuehn, K, Kuropatkin, N, Lahav, O, Lee, AT, Leitch, EM, Lima, M, Luong-Van, D, Maia, MAG, Manzotti, A, Marrone, DP, Marshall, JL, McMahon, JJ, Melchior, P, Menanteau, F, Meyer, SS, Miller, CJ, and Mocanu, LM
Subjects: Astronomical Sciences, Physical Sciences, gravitational lensing: weak, cosmological parameters, cosmology: observations, large-scale structure of Universe, astro-ph.CO, Astronomical and Space Sciences, Astronomy & Astrophysics, Astronomical sciences, Particle and high energy physics, Space sciences
Abstract: Correlations between tracers of the matter density field and gravitational lensing are sensitive to the evolution of the matter power spectrum and the expansion rate across cosmic time. Appropriately defined ratios of such correlation functions, on the other hand, depend only on the angular diameter distances to the tracer objects and to the gravitational lensing source planes. Because of their simple cosmological dependence, such ratios can exploit available signal-to-noise ratio down to small angular scales, even where directly modelling the correlation functions is difficult. We present a measurement of lensing ratios using galaxy position and lensing data from the Dark Energy Survey, and CMB lensing data from the South Pole Telescope and Planck, obtaining the highest precision lensing ratio measurements to date. Relative to the concordance CDM model, we find a best-fitting lensing ratio amplitude of A = 1.1 ± 0.1. We use the ratio measurements to generate cosmological constraints, focusing on the curvature parameter. We demonstrate that photometrically selected galaxies can be used to measure lensing ratios, and argue that future lensing ratio measurements with data from a combination of LSST and Stage-4 CMB experiments can be used to place interesting cosmological constraints, even after considering the systematic uncertainties associated with photometric redshift and galaxy shear estimation.
Published: 2019

49. Holmium Versus Thulium Laser Enucleation of the Prostate: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Author: Hartung, Friedrich O., Kowalewski, Karl-Friedrich, von Hardenberg, Jost, Worst, Thomas S., Kriegmair, Maximilian C., Nuhn, Philipp, Herrmann, Thomas R.W., Michel, Maurice S., and Herrmann, Jonas
Published: 2022
Full Text: View/download PDF

50. Density split statistics: joint model of counts and lensing in cells

Author: Friedrich, O., Gruen, D., DeRose, J., Kirk, D., Krause, E., McClintock, T., Rykoff, E. S., Seitz, S., Wechsler, R. H., Bernstein, G. M., Blazek, J., Chang, C., Hilbert, S., Jain, B., Kovacs, A., Lahav, O., Abdalla, F. B., Allam, S., Annis, J., Bechtol, K., Benoit-Levy, A., Bertin, E., Brooks, D., Rosell, A. Carnero, Kind, M. Carrasco, Carretero, J., Cunha, C. E., D'Andrea, C. B., da Costa, L. N., Davis, C., Desai, S., Diehl, H. T., Dietrich, J. P., Drlica-Wagner, A., Eifler, T. F., Fosalba, P., Frieman, J., Garcia-Bellido, J., Gaztanaga, E., Gerdes, D. W., Giannantonio, T., Gruendl, R. A., Gschwend, J., Gutierrez, G., Honscheid, K., James, D. J., Jarvis, M., Kuehn, K., Kuropatkin, N., Lima, M., March, M., Marshall, J. L., Melchior, P., Menanteau, F., Miquel, R., Mohr, J. J., Nord, B., Plazas, A. A., Sanchez, E., Scarpine, V., Schindler, R., Schubnell, M., Sevilla-Noarbe, I., Sheldon, E., Smith, M., Soares-Santos, M., Sobreira, F., Suchyta, E., Swanson, M. E. C., Tarle, G., Thomas, D., Troxel, M. A., Vikram, V., and Weller, J.
Subjects: Astrophysics - Cosmology and Nongalactic Astrophysics
Abstract: We present density split statistics, a framework that studies lensing and counts-in-cells as a function of foreground galaxy density, thereby providing a large-scale measurement of both 2-point and 3-point statistics. Our method extends our earlier work on trough lensing and is summarized as follows: given a foreground (low redshift) population of galaxies, we divide the sky into subareas of equal size but distinct galaxy density. We then measure lensing around uniformly spaced points separately in each of these subareas, as well as counts-in-cells statistics (CiC). The lensing signals trace the matter density contrast around regions of fixed galaxy density. Through the CiC measurements this can be related to the density profile around regions of fixed matter density. Together, these measurements constitute a powerful probe of cosmology, the skewness of the density field and the connection of galaxies and matter. In this paper we show how to model both the density split lensing signal and CiC from basic ingredients: a non-linear power spectrum, clustering hierarchy coefficients from perturbation theory and a parametric model for galaxy bias and shot-noise. Using N-body simulations, we demonstrate that this model is sufficiently accurate for a cosmological analysis on year 1 data from the Dark Energy Survey., Comment: 21 pages + appendix, accepted for publication in PRD
Published: 2017
Full Text: View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources

See catalog results

Searchworks

Select search scope, currently: Articles Catalog books, media & more in Jio Institute collections Articles journal articles & other e-resources

Search

Search Constraints

Refine your results

Search Limiters

Topic

Publication Year Range

Language

Category

Publication Type

Journal

Region

Database

Publisher

1,256 results on '"Friedrich, O."'

Search Results

Catalog

Select search scope, currently: Articles

Catalog

books, media & more in Jio Institute collections

Articles

journal articles & other e-resources