Search

Accessible flood modeling for low-resource, data-scarce communities currently does not exist. This paper proposes using drone imagery to compensate for the lack of other flood modeling data (i.e. streamflow measurements). Three flood models were run for Dzaleka Refugee Camp, located in Dowa, Malawi. Two of the models (the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) and the Hydrologic Engineering Center River Analysis System (HEC-RAS)) are commonly used hydrological-hydraulic based models. The third model, the Water Caused Erosion Patterns (WCEP) model, was proposed by the author to capitalize on the high-resolution drone imagery using geological-geomorphological information. The drone imagery used in this study has a resolution of 3.5cm and shows erosion patterns throughout the refugee camp. By comparing the erosion patterns to flow direction of the surface, the erosion patterns were determined to be water caused or not water caused, the erosion patterns considered water caused were defined as high-risk flood areas, creating the WCEP model. The three models were compared using locations of collapsed houses throughout the camp. It was found that the WCEP model represents the location of collapsed houses significantly better (misclassification rate below 17%) than the SWAT or HEC-RAS models (misclassification rate below 54%, and 67% respectively). The WCEP model was combined with the best hydrological-hydraulic model (SWAT) to create a hydrogeomorphological model which capitalizes on both the drone imagery and the hydrological process. Master of Science The negative impact flooding has on communities can be reduced through flood modeling. But commonly used flood models are not accessible to data-scarce communities because of the historical data the models require. This paper explores using aerial imagery taken by a drone to make-up for the lack of historical data at Dzaleka Refugee Camp located in Dowa, Malawi. Drone imagery has a very high spatial resolution (3.5cm), so it is able to provide a lot of details, including marks that show an increase of flooding in certain areas and elevation information. The flood model presented in this paper is created using the found flood marks in drone imagery. The presented model is then compared to two commonly used flood models, and all three flood models are compared to locations of houses that collapsed from flooding throughout the refugee camp. The model created using drone imagery did the best job predicting high-risk locations with misclassification rates below 17%. The drone imagery model was then combined with a commonly used model to create a more comprehensive flood model, capitalizing on all available data.