Search

ZusammenfassungOnkologischen PatientInnen wird ein regelmäßiges körperliches Training explizit empfohlen. Das Hochintensive Intervalltraining (HIIT) rückt dank steigender Evidenzlage in unterschiedlichen Diagnosegruppen vermehrt in den Fokus der onkologischen Sport- und Bewegungstherapie. Die Betrachtung der aktuellen Literatur zeigt, dass das HIIT für Krebspatienten nach Abschluss der Therapie eine potenziell sichere sowie durchführbare Trainingsmethode ist. Darüber hinaus kann das HIIT positive Effekte auf die verringerte körperliche Leistungsfähigkeit von Krebspatienten haben. In diesem Zusammenhang ist sowohl das „4×4“- als auch das „10×1“-Protokoll mit onkologischen PatientInnen nach Abschluss der Therapie auf dem Fahrradergometer durchführbar, wobei insbesondere das „4×4“-Schema zur Realisierung von intensiven Trainingsreizen geeignet ist. Trotz zunehmender Untersuchungen bezüglich der Effekte von HIIT auf onkologische PatientInnen werden in diesem Forschungsbereich weitere qualitativ hochwertige Studien mit großer Teilnehmendenzahl benötigt.

Purpose The aim of this study was to compare the effects of different exercise modes (aerobic, resistance) and intensity prescriptions (standard, polarized, undulating) on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in cancer survivors. Methods 107 breast or prostate cancer survivors (52% females, age 58 ± 10 years, 6–52 weeks after primary therapy) performed one out of four training programs, two sessions/week, over 12 weeks: work rate-matched vigorous intensity aerobic training (ATStandard, n = 28) and polarized intensity aerobic training (ATPolarized, n = 26) as well as volume-matched moderate intensity resistance training (RTStandard, n = 26) and daily undulating intensity resistance training (RTUndulating, n = 27). Health-related quality of life (HRQoL, EORTC-QLQ-C30) and cancer-related fatigue (CRF, MFI-20) were assessed at baseline, at the end of intervention and after a 12-week follow-up without further prescribed exercise. Results Over the intervention period, HRQoL-function-scales of the EORTC-QLQ-C30 improved over time (p = .007), but no group*time interaction was observed (p = .185). Similarly, CRF values of the MFI-20 improved over time (p = .006), but no group*time interaction was observed (p = .663). When including the follow-up period and pooling the AT and the RT groups, HRQoL-function-scales developed differently between groups (p = .022) with further improvements in RT and a decline in AT. For CRF no significant interaction was found, but univariate analyses showed a non-significant trend of more sustainable effects in RT. Conclusions AT and RT with different work rate-/volume-matched intensity prescriptions elicits positive effects on HRQoL and CRF, without one regimen being significantly superior to another over the intervention period. However, RT might result in more sustainable effects compared to AT over a follow-up period without any further exercise prescription. Clinical trial registration The study was registered at clinicaltrials.gov (NCT02883699).

Background Standardized training prescriptions often result in large variation in training response with a substantial number of individuals that show little or no response at all. The present study examined whether the nonresponse in markers of cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) to moderate intensity endurance training can be overcome through an increase in training intensity. Methods Thirty-one healthy, untrained participants (46 ± 8 years, BMI 25.4 ± 3.3 kg•m-2 and V̇O2max 34 ± 4 mL•min-1•kg-1) trained for 10 weeks with moderate intensity (3 d•wk-1 for 50 min per session at 55% HRreserve). Hereafter, the allocation into two groups was performed by stratified randomisation for age, gender and VO2max response. CON trained for another 16 weeks at moderate intensity, INC trained energy-equivalent for 8 weeks at 70% HRreserve and then performed high-intensity interval training (4x4) for another 8 weeks. Nonresponders were identified as participants with VO2max increase below the technical measurement error. Results There was a significant difference in V̇O2max response between INC (3.4±2.7mL•kg-1•min-1) and CON (0.4±2.9 mL•kg-1•min-1 ) after 26 weeks of training (P=.020). After 10 weeks of moderate training, in total 15 of 31 participants were classified as VO2max nonresponders (48%). After another 16 weeks continuous moderate intensity training, no further reduction of nonresponders was observed in CON. In contrast, the energy equivalent training with increasing training intensity in INC significantly (P=.008) reduced the number of nonresponders to 2 of 15 (13%). The energy equivalent higher training intensities eliminated the rate of nonresponders more effectively than continued moderate training intensities (P=.012). Conclusion Increasing exercise-intensity can reduce the rate of nonresponse in VO2max to endurance training even when the total energy expenditure is held constant. Maintaining moderate endurance training intensities might not be the best choice to optimize training gains.

Purpose To prescribe resistance training (RT) using percentages of (%) maximal strength (Smax), it is prerequisite that (I) methods for testing Smax are valid and (II) the relationship between %Smax and the corresponding number of repetitions (NOR) is known. This has never been investigated in cancer survivors (CS) and was the purpose of the present study. Methods Twenty breast (58 ± 10y) and 20 prostate CS (68 ± 6y), 3.6 ± 2.4 months after primary therapy, completed one one-repetition maximum (1-RM) test, one hypothetical 1-RM (h1-RM) test and three RT sessions (three sets at six different strength machines (SM)). H1-RM was calculated using two commonly used equations (after Brzycki and Epley), resulting in three Smax values for each SM, which were then compared to each other (1-RM as a reference). Each RT session was performed at a different intensity (92%, 69% and 47% of 1-RM/h1-RM). CS performed repetitions to fatigue and the resulting NOR were compared to the predicted NOR. Results Smax values differed between 1-RM and h1-RM values for each SM and between h1-RM values for some SM. Differences between performed and predicted NOR occurred among all intensities and methods. Conclusion Different strength tests yield different results for Smax and a certain %1-RM/h1-RM does not necessarily correspond to a specific NOR in all individuals, which questions the use of (I) h1-RM tests for determining Smax and (II) prescribing RT intensities based on %1-RM/h1-RM which is still the most common method used for RT intensity prescription in healthy individuals and patient populations, including CS.

The aim of this study is to evaluate retinal and optic nerve head (ONH) perfusion in patients with systolic chronic heart failure (CHF) compared to healthy control subjects. Twenty-seven eyes of 27 patients with CHF (study group) and 31 eyes of 31 healthy subjects (control group) were prospectively included in this study. CHF Patients had a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)

Purpose Physical activity promises to reduce disease-related symptoms and therapy-related side effects in patients suffering from aggressive lymphoma (L) or acute leukemia (AL). For an efficient training program, determination of patients’ physical capacity with a purposive exercise test is crucial. Here, we evaluated the feasibility and suitability of a graded exercise test (GXT) frequently applied in patients suffering from solid tumors by assessing whether patients achieved criteria for maximal exercise testing according to the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM). Methods The GXT was performed by 51 patients with an aggressive L or AL prior to the start or in the earliest possible phase of high-dose chemotherapy, following a recommended protocol for cancer patients, starting at 20 Watts (W), with an increase of 10 W/min until volitional exhaustion. Subsequently, we investigated whether the following ACSM criteria were fulfilled: (1) failure of heart rate to increase despite increasing workload, (2) post-exercise capillary lactate concentration ≥ 8.0 mmol L−1, (3) rating of perceived exertion at exercise cessation > 17 on the 6–20 Borg Scale. Results Out of 51 patients, two, six, and 35 participants met the first, second, and third criterion, respectively. No relevant relationships between the completion of the criteria and patients’ characteristics (e.g., gender, age) were found. Conclusion Although results of this study suggest a general feasibility of the applied GXT, the ACSM criteria were not met by the majority of the participants. Therefore, this study raises doubts about the suitability of the GXT protocol and the ACSM criteria for this group of patients., Support Care Cancer

Schlüter, K, Schneider, J, Rosenberger, F, and Wiskemann, J. Feasibility of high-intensity resistance training sessions in cancer survivors. J Strength Cond Res 36(9): 2643-2652, 2022-Moderate-intensity resistance training (MIRT) is regarded as safe in cancer survivors (CS), but for high-intensity resistance training (HIRT), evidence is lacking. Hence, in the current exploratory analyses, single sessions of HIRT are compared with MIRT regarding safety and feasibility. Twenty-three of 24 included CS (14 breast and 10 prostate CS, 61.6 ± 9.5 years, body mass index 27.0 ± 4.3 kg·m -2 , 6-52 weeks after end of primary therapy) started a 12-week resistance training (RT) with a daily undulating periodization model including HIRT (90% of 1 repetition maximum [1RM]) and MIRT (67% 1RM) sessions. Parameters of safety (adverse events [AEs] and training-related pain), feasibility (physical and mental exhaustion, sensation of effort, enjoyment, and dropout rate), and adherence were assessed. An alpha level of 0.05 was applied for analyses. Nineteen of 23 training starters (83%) completed all sessions. Fourteen minor AEs occurred. A significantly higher increase for physical exhaustion appeared in HIRT ( p0.001). For 18% (HIRT) and 19% (MIRT) of the sessions, training-related pain was reported with no significant difference between intensities. In total, 34% of HIRT and 35% of MIRT sessions were perceived as overstraining or partly overstraining with no significant difference between intensities, but enjoyment (median and quartiles on a 1-7 scale) was high for both (HIRT = 5 [5;6] and MIRT = 5 [4,6]). Our analysis indicates that HIRT sessions do not differ from MIRT sessions concerning safety or feasibility, but training-related pain should be monitored. RT protocols incorporating high-intensity training loads can be applied safely in breast and prostate CS.

Background/AimDacryocystorhinostomy (DCR) remains the gold standard therapy for nasolacrimal duct obstruction (NLDO), but is invasive and does not maintain the physiology of the lacrimal pathway. With transcanlicular microdrill dacryoplasty (MDP), there is a minimally invasive alternative surgical approach. This study aimed to present this modern lacrimal duct surgery technique and to evaluate its long-term success rate in a large study population.MethodsThe medical records of 1010 patients with acquired NLDO were retrospectively reviewed. Adult patients who had undergone transcanalicular MDP were included. The evaluation included the following parameters: age, gender, success rate, complication rate, obstruction grade and patient satisfaction. Long-term results regarding patient satisfaction and success rate were evaluated by a telephone survey. Only a complete resolution of symptoms was defined as success.Results793 eyes of 576 patients after transcanalicular MDP could be included in the study. The mean follow-up time was 8.7±0.9 years. Initial surgical success rate was 84.0%. At the time of the follow-up, 57.5% (n=229) still had full resolution of symptoms. The mean patient satisfaction with the procedure was 6.9±3.2 out of 10 points. Heavy bleeding occurred in two cases only (0.25%).ConclusionThis is the first study to show the success rate of microendoscopic lacrimal duct surgery after such a long follow-up period and in such a large study population. Transcanalicular MDP is a minimally invasive technique with a very low complication rate and can be used as an alternative procedure before performing more invasive lacrimal duct surgery such as DCR.

Purpose Cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) seems to be prognostic prior to allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Influencing factors of CRF in allo-HSCT candidates have not been studied so far. Aim was to identify potentially influencing factors on CRF. Methods To assess CRF, a maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET) was performed on average 2.6 ± 7.2 days prior to admission. A regression analysis was conducted, with the following predictors: gender, age, body mass index (BMI), time between last therapy and allo-HSCT (t_Therapies), number of cardiotoxic therapies (n_Cardiotox), number of transplantations (n_Transplantations), comorbidity index (HCT-CI), hemoglobin level of the last 3 months (area under the curve), and physical activity. Results A total of 194 patients performed a CPET. VO2peak was significantly reduced compared with reference data. In total, VO2peak was 21.4 ml/min/kg (− 27.5%, p p 2peak was significantly (p Conclusions Our study demonstrates a decreased CRF indicating the potential need of prehabilitative exercise. We revealed some influencing factors on CRF. Those patients could benefit the most from exercise.

Cancer survivors demonstrate a reduced maximal oxygen uptake, which is clinically relevant in terms of overall survival. However, it remains uncertain whether they attain their “true maximal oxygen uptake” in a cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET). In the present study, a supramaximal verification bout (Verif) was applied in cancer survivors to confirm attainment of maximal oxygen uptake. Seventy-five participants (age, 61 ± 12 years; n = 43 females with breast cancer and n = 32 males with prostate cancer, 6–52 weeks after primary therapy) performed a CPET on a cycle ergometer and a Verif at 110% peak power output. As verification criterion, maximal oxygen uptake in Verif should not exceed maximal oxygen uptake in CPET by >3%. On average, maximal oxygen uptake was significantly lower in Verif compared with CPET (1.60 ± 0.38 L·min–1 vs. 1.65 ± 0.36 L·min–1, p = .023). On the individual level, n = 51 (68%) satisfied the verification criterion, whereas n = 24 (32%) demonstrated a higher maximal oxygen uptake in Verif. n = 69 (92%) fulfilled ≥2 secondary criteria for maximal exhaustion in the CPET. While maximal oxygen uptake was not underestimated in the CPET on average, one-third of cancer survivors did not attain their true maximal oxygen uptake. Verif appears feasible and beneficial to confirm true maximal oxygen uptake in this population. Furthermore, it might be more reliable than secondary criteria for maximal exhaustion. Novelty In about one-third of cancer survivors, maximal oxygen uptake is underestimated by a CPET. This underestimation of maximal oxygen uptake is not necessarily indicated by secondary criteria for maximal exhaustion. A supramaximal verification bout appears feasible and helpful for the determination of maximal oxygen uptake in cancer survivors.

Purpose Most studies with cancer survivors use percentages of peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) for intensity prescription. Lactate or ventilatory thresholds might be useful submaximal alternatives, but this has never been investigated. Therefore, we aimed at comparing three training sessions prescribed using %VO2peak (reference), lactate thresholds, and ventilatory thresholds in terms of meeting the vigorous-intensity zone, physiological, and psychological responses. Methods Twenty breast (58 ± 10 years) and 20 prostate cancer survivors (68 ± 6 years), 3.6 ± 2.4 months after primary therapy, completed a maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test and three vigorous training sessions in randomized order: 38 min of cycling at 70% VO2peak (M-VO2peak), 97% of individual anaerobic lactate threshold (M-IAT), and 67% between ventilatory thresholds 1 and 2 (M-VT). Heart rate (HR), blood lactate concentration (bLa), perceived exertion, and enjoyment were assessed. Results Cancer survivors exercised at 75 ± 23, 85 ± 18, and 79 ± 19 W during M-VO2peak, M-IAT, and M-VT (p > .05). Sessions could not be completed in 3, 8, and 6 cases. Session completers showed HR of 82 ± 7, 83 ± 9, and 84 ± 8 %HRpeak and bLa of 3.7 ± 1.9, 3.9 ± 0.9, and 3.9 ± 1.5 mmol·l−1, which was not different between sessions (p > .05). However, variance in bLa was lower in M-IAT compared to M-VO2peak (p = .001) and to M-VT (p = .022). Conclusion All intensity prescription methods on average met the targeted intensity zone. Metabolic response was most homogeneous when using lactate thresholds. Implications for cancer survivors Submaximal thresholds are at least as useful as VO2peak for intensity prescription in cancer survivors. Overall, slightly lower percentages should be chosen to improve durability of the training sessions.

PURPOSE: Exercise has been underutilized in people with advanced or incurable cancer despite the potential to improve physical function and reduce psychosocial morbidity, especially for people with bone metastases because of concerns over skeletal complications. The International Bone Metastases Exercise Working Group (IBMEWG) was formed to develop best practice recommendations for exercise programming for people with bone metastases on the basis of published research, clinical experience, and expert opinion. METHODS: The IBMEWG undertook sequential steps to inform the recommendations: (1) modified Delphi survey, (2) systematic review, (3) cross-sectional survey to physicians and nurse practitioners, (4) in-person meeting of IBMEWG to review evidence from steps 1-3 to develop draft recommendations, and (5) stakeholder engagement. RESULTS: Recommendations emerged from the contributing evidence and IBMEWG discussion for pre-exercise screening, exercise testing, exercise prescription, and monitoring of exercise response. Identification of individuals who are potentially at higher risk of exercise-related skeletal complication is a complex interplay of these factors: (1) lesion-related, (2) cancer and cancer treatment–related, and (3) the person-related. Exercise assessment and prescription requires consideration of the location and presentation of bone lesion(s) and should be delivered by qualified exercise professionals with oncology education and exercise prescription experience. Emphasis on postural alignment, controlled movement, and proper technique is essential. CONCLUSION: Ultimately, the perceived risk of skeletal complications should be weighed against potential health benefits on the basis of consultation between the person, health care team, and exercise professionals. These recommendations provide an initial framework to improve the integration of exercise programming into clinical care for people with bone metastases.

Background Exercise has the potential to improve physical function and quality of life in individuals with bone metastases but is often avoided due to safety concerns. This systematic review summarizes the safety, feasibility and efficacy of exercise in controlled trials that include individuals with bone metastases. Methods MEDLINE, Embase, Pubmed, CINAHL, PEDro and CENTRAL databases were searched up to July 16, 2020. Results A total of 17 trials were included incorporating aerobic exercise, resistance exercise or soccer interventions. Few (n = 4, 0.5%) serious adverse events were attributed to exercise participation, with none related to bone metastases. Mixed efficacy results were found, with exercise eliciting positive changes or no change. The majority of trials included an element of supervised exercise instruction (n = 16, 94%) and were delivered by qualified exercise professionals (n = 13, 76%). Conclusions Exercise appears safe and feasible for individuals with bone metastases when it includes an element of supervised exercise instruction.

ZusammenfassungÜber das Auftreten von Zwischenfällen, sogenannten Adverse Events, im Training mit onkologischen Patienten liegen bislang nur wenige Daten vor. Diese wurden im Rahmen von klinischen Studien erfasst und beschreiben das Training als sicher. Ziel der vorliegenden Arbeit war es, die Sicherheit von Training mit onkologischen Patienten in der Routineversorgung zu erfassen.Mithilfe eines selbstentwickelten Fragebogens wurden retrospektiv für das Jahr 2017 Trainingszentren befragt, wie häufig Serious Adverse Events (Tod, reanimationspflichtiger Herzkreislaufstillstand, Knochenbrüche, Narbenbrüche, Verletzungen) und Non-Serious Adverse Events (Krampfanfälle, Übelkeit / Erbrechen, muskuläre Beschwerden, Kreislaufbeschwerden, oberflächliche Wunden / Hämatome) während des Trainings mit onkologischen Patienten aufgetreten waren.Es konnten 34 Fragebögen aus 12 Ländern ausgewertet werden. In insgesamt 91.252 Patientenstunden traten 672 Adverse Events auf. Davon wurden 10 Zwischenfälle als Serious Adverse Events bewertet (Inzidenz 11 pro 100.000 Patientenstunden), wobei keine Todesfälle darunter waren. Die meisten (n = 6) Serious Adverse Events traten während des Ausdauertrainings auf. Als Non-Serious Adverse Events wurden 662 Zwischenfälle angegeben (Inzidenz 725 pro 100.000 Patientenstunden). Non-Serious Adverse Events wurden auf alle Trainingsarten verteilt beobachtet.Training mit onkologischen Patienten in der Routineversorgung außerhalb von Studien kann vorläufig als sicher bewertet werden, da die vorliegende erste Erhebung in über 90.000 Patientenstunden keinen Todesfall ergab. Allerdings sollten Sporttherapeuten auf Zwischenfälle vorbereitet sein und Ausdauertraining besonders aufmerksam betreuen.

The aim of this study is to evaluate retinal and optic nerve head (ONH) perfusion in patients with systolic chronic heart failure (CHF) compared to healthy control subjects.Twenty-seven eyes of 27 patients with CHF (study group) and 31 eyes of 31 healthy subjects (control group) were prospectively included in this study. CHF Patients had a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) 50% and were classified by New York Heart Association (NYHA) class. OCT-A was performed using RTVue XR Avanti with AngioVue (Optovue, Inc, Fremont, CA, USA). The area of the foveal avascular zone (FAZ) and flow density (FD) data were extracted and analyzed.There was no significant difference in the signal strength index between the study group (group 1) and the control group (group 2) (ONH: p = 0.015; macula: p = 0.703). The difference in the area of the foveal avascular zone between the two groups was also not significant (p = 0.726). The flow density (whole en face) in the ONH (RPC) in group 1 was significantly lower compared to control (group 1 = 48.40 ± 2.48 (49.0 [46.7, 50.3]); group 2 = 50.15 ± 1.85 (50.6 [48.5, 51.70]); p = 0.008). There was a significant and strong correlation between LVEF and the macular flow density (whole en face) (superficial: rs = 0.605 deep: rs = 0.425, p 0.01).Patients with CHF showed reduced flow density compared with healthy controls. The reduced FD correlated with the LVEF and the functional (NYHA) class. Retinal perfusion as measured using OCTA might provide an insight into the global microperfusion and hemodynamic state of heart failure patients.

Exercise concomitant to radiotherapy for stable spinal metastases was demonstrated to increase bone density and reduce pain. In the DISPO-II study, the feasibility of exercise concomitant to radiotherapy for unstable spinal metastases was investigated. Here, a detailed analysis of the training program is presented. Cancer patients with spinal metastases (Taneichi score &ge, D) were randomly assigned to an intervention group (INT, n = 27, 62 &plusmn, 9 years) or control group (CON, n = 29, 61 &plusmn, 9 years). INT performed spinal stabilization exercises (&ldquo, all fours&rdquo, /&ldquo, plank&rdquo, swimmer&rdquo, band exercise&rdquo, ), and CON received relaxation, daily concomitant to radiotherapy. Exercise attendance rate was 90% in INT and 80% in CON (p = 0.126). Within INT, exercise dose increased significantly (p &lt, 0.001). 54% of patients could not perform &ldquo, in some or all sessions. 42% could not perform &ldquo, in some or all sessions. 13 and 25% could not perform &ldquo, and &ldquo, in some sessions. &ldquo, Plank&rdquo, holding time increased in INT and remained unchanged in CON with different development between groups (p = 0.022). Handgrip strength did not develop differently between groups (p = 0.397). The exercise intervention demonstrated high acceptability but required frequent modifications due to pain, weakness and immobility to be feasible for the majority of participants. It enhanced specific muscle strength. Larger trials should now investigate exercise effects on health.

Purpose Induction of IDO depends on the activation of AhR forming the AhR/IDO axis. Activated AhR can transcribe various target genes including cytotoxic and inhibiting receptors of NK cells. We investigated whether AhR and IDO levels as well as activating (NKG2D) and inhibiting (KIR2DL1) NK cell receptors are influenced by acute exercise and different chronic endurance exercise programs. Methods 21 adult breast and prostate cancer patients of the TOP study (NCT02883699) were randomized to intervention programs of 12 weeks of (1) endurance standard training or (2) endurance polarized training after a cardiopulmonary exercise test (CPET). Serum was collected pre-CPET, immediately post-CPET, 1 h post-CPET and after 12 weeks post-intervention. Flow cytometry analysis was performed on autologous serum incubated NK-92 cells for: AhR, IDO, KIR2DL1 and NKG2D. Differences were investigated using analysis-of-variance for acute and analysis-of-covariance for chronic effects. Results Acute exercise: IDO levels changed over time with a significant increase from post-CPET to 1 h post-CPET (p = 0.03). KIR2DL1 levels significantly decreased over time (p p = 0.31). Chronic exercise: for both IDO and NKG2D a significant group × time interaction, a significant time effect and a significant difference after 12 weeks of intervention were observed (IDO: all p p > 0.05). Conclusion Both acute and chronic endurance training may regulate NK cell function via the AhR/IDO axis. This is clinically relevant, as exercise emerges to be a key player in immune regulation.

Chemotherapy is a physically and psychologically highly demanding treatment, and specific Internet-based interventions for cancer patients addressing both physical side effects and emotional distress during chemotherapy are scarce. This study examined the feasibility and acceptability of a guided biopsychosocial online intervention for cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy (OPaCT). A pre-post, within-participant comparison, mixed-methods research design was followed. Patients starting chemotherapy at the outpatient clinic of the National Center for Tumor Diseases in Heidelberg, Germany, were enrolled. Feasibility and acceptability were evaluated through intervention uptake, attrition, adherence and participant satisfaction. As secondary outcomes, PHQ-9, GAD-7, SCNS-SF34-G and CBI-B-D were administered. A total of N = 46 patients participated in the study (female 76.1%). The age of participants ranged from 29 to 70 years (M = 49.3, SD = 11.3). The most prevalent tumour diseases were breast (45.7%), pancreatic (19.6%), ovarian (13.1%) and prostate cancer (10.8%). A total of N = 37 patients (80.4%) completed the OPaCT intervention. Qualitative and quantitative data showed a high degree of participant satisfaction. Significant improvements in the SCNS-SF34 subscale ‘psychological needs’ were found. Study results demonstrate the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention. The results show that OPaCT can be implemented well, both in the treatment process and in participants’ everyday lives. Although it is premature to make any determination regarding the efficacy of the intervention tested in this feasibility study, these results suggest that OPaCT has the potential to reduce unmet psychological care needs of patients undergoing chemotherapy.

(1) Background: Pancreatic cancer (PaCa) is directly related to malnutrition, cachexia and weight loss. Nutritional interventions (NI) are used in addition to standard therapy. The aim of this systematic review is to provide an overview of the types of NI and their effects. (2) Methods: We included RCTs with at least one intervention group receiving an NI and compared them with a control group with no NI, placebo or alternative treatment on cachexia, malnutrition or weight loss in patients with PaCa. Any available literature until 12 August 2021 was searched in the Pubmed and Cochrane databases. RCTs were sorted according to NI (parenteral nutrition, enteral nutrition, dietary supplements and mixed or special forms). (3) Results: Finally, 26 studies with a total of 2720 patients were included. The potential for bias was mostly moderate to high. Parenteral nutrition is associated with a higher incidence of complications. Enteral nutrition is associated with shorter length of stay in hospital, lower rate and development of complications, positive effects on cytokine rates and lower weight loss. Dietary supplements enriched with omega-3 fatty acids lead to higher body weight and lean body mass. (4) Conclusions: Enteral nutrition and dietary supplements with omega-3 fatty acids should be preferred in nutritional therapy of PaCa patients.

While there is growing evidence for positive effects of progressive resistance training in curatively treated cancer patients, data on advanced cancer patients are scarce. This pilot study aimed at investigating for the first time feasibility and effects of progressive resistance training in advanced cancer patients undergoing tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. Patients starting a TKI-based anti-tumor therapy were assigned to a resistance training group (RT, 12 weeks of progressive machine-based resistance training 2×/week) or a control group (CON, treatment as usual) until 10 patients had finished in each group (RT 80% males, 90% renal cell carcinoma, 65 ± 11 years, CON 80% males, 70% renal cell carcinoma, 61 ± 6 years). Primary endpoint was feasibility. Furthermore, fatigue (MFI), quality of life (QoL, EORTC QLQC30), and muscle strength were assessed. Testing occurred at baseline and after 12 weeks. Training was feasible in 9 out of 10 participants and no serious adverse events occurred. It had beneficial effects on muscle strength (maximum voluntary isometric contraction of the quadriceps: RT +11 ± 9 Nm, CON −13 ± 25 Nm, p = 0.005), but not on fatigue (general fatigue score RT +0.3 ± 4.1, CON -1.5 ± 3.0, p = 0.223) or QoL (global QoL score RT −5.6 ± 16.1, CON −2.0 ± 18.2, p = 0.617). Progressive machine-based resistance training appears feasible in the majority of advanced cancer patients undergoing TKI therapy. However, its positive effects on muscle strength do not seem to be associated with positive effects on fatigue or quality of life. Future studies should therefore compare whether home-based training is more beneficial for patient-reported outcomes. NCT01645150

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate retinal and optic nerve head (ONH) perfusion in patients with inactive Graves ophthalmopathy (GO) and compare it to healthy controls using optical coherence tomography angiography (OCTA). Methods: Twenty-nine eyes of 29 patients with inactive GO (study group) and 29 eyes of 29 healthy subjects (control group) were included in this study. The vessel density (VD) data in the superficial and deep retinal OCT angiogram of the macula and the radial peripapillary capillary network (RPC) were extracted and analyzed. OCTA was performed using RTVue XR Avanti with AngioVue (Optovue Inc, Fremont, CA). Clinical activity was evaluated using the clinical activity score, the severity assessment using the NOSPECS classification. Results: The VD in the superficial OCT angiogram and in the OCT angiogram of the ONH was significantly lower in the GO group when compared to the control group (whole en face, P = .016; parafovea, P = .026; RPC peripapillary, P = .027). There was no significant correlation between VD and functional parameters or the NOSPECS classification. Conclusion: Macular VD and ONH capillary density measured using OCTA were significantly lower in the study group compared to healthy controls. Noninvasive quantitative analysis of retinal perfusion using OCTA could be useful in monitoring patients with GO. Abbreviations: CAS = clinical activity score; GO = Graves ophthalmopathy; OCTA = optical coherence tomography angiography; ONH = optic nerve head; RPC = radial peripapillary capillary; rSp = Spearman's correlation coefficient; VD = vessel density.

Purpose Most studies with cancer survivors use percentages of peak oxygen uptake (VO2peak) for intensity prescription. Lactate or ventilatory thresholds might be useful submaximal alternatives, but this has never been investigated. Therefore, we aimed at comparing three training sessions prescribed using %VO2peak (reference), lactate thresholds, and ventilatory thresholds in terms of meeting the vigorous-intensity zone, physiological, and psychological responses. Methods Twenty breast (58 ± 10 years) and 20 prostate cancer survivors (68 ± 6 years), 3.6 ± 2.4 months after primary therapy, completed a maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test and three vigorous training sessions in randomized order: 38 min of cycling at 70% VO2peak (M-VO2peak), 97% of individual anaerobic lactate threshold (M-IAT), and 67% between ventilatory thresholds 1 and 2 (M-VT). Heart rate (HR), blood lactate concentration (bLa), perceived exertion, and enjoyment were assessed. Results Cancer survivors exercised at 75 ± 23, 85 ± 18, and 79 ± 19 W during M-VO2peak, M-IAT, and M-VT (p > .05). Sessions could not be completed in 3, 8, and 6 cases. Session completers showed HR of 82 ± 7, 83 ± 9, and 84 ± 8 %HRpeak and bLa of 3.7 ± 1.9, 3.9 ± 0.9, and 3.9 ± 1.5 mmol·l−1, which was not different between sessions (p > .05). However, variance in bLa was lower in M-IAT compared to M-VO2peak (p = .001) and to M-VT (p = .022). Conclusion All intensity prescription methods on average met the targeted intensity zone. Metabolic response was most homogeneous when using lactate thresholds. Implications for cancer survivors Submaximal thresholds are at least as useful as VO2peak for intensity prescription in cancer survivors. Overall, slightly lower percentages should be chosen to improve durability of the training sessions.

PURPOSE High-intensity interval training (HIIT) is a time-efficient and promising tool for enhancing physical fitness. However, there is lack of research concerning safety and feasibility of HIIT in cancer survivors. Therefore, two different HIIT protocols were investigated in terms of safety, feasibility, and acute exercise responses. METHODS Forty cancer survivors (20 breast and 20 prostate cancer survivors, 62.9 ± 9.2 yr, BMI 27.4 ± 3.9 kg·m, 6 to 52 wk after the end of primary therapy) completed a maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test and two HIIT protocols on a cycle ergometer: 10 × 1 min at peak power output (10 × 1) and 4 × 4 min at 85%-95% peak HR (4 × 4). Safety (adverse events), acute physiological responses (HR, blood lactate concentration) and acute psychological responses (RPE, enjoyment) were recorded. RESULTS No major but three minor adverse events occurred. Ninety-five percent of participants were able to complete each HIIT protocol. Estimated energy expenditure (159 ± 15 vs 223 ± 45 kcal, P < 0.001), HR (128 ± 20 vs 139 ± 18 bpm; P < 0.001), blood lactate concentration (5.4 ± 1.0 vs 5.9 ± 1.9 mmol·L; P = 0.035), and RPE legs/breathing (13.8 ± 2.0/13.1 ± 2.0 vs 14.6 ± 2.1/14.3 ± 2.0; P = 0.038/0.003) were significantly higher in the 4 × 4. Enjoyment did not differ between protocols (P = 0.301). CONCLUSIONS The two HIIT protocols as single sessions appear safe and in the vast majority of breast and prostate cancer survivors after the end of primary therapy also feasible and enjoyable. The 4 × 4 elicited higher energy expenditure and higher cardio-circulatory and metabolic strain and might therefore be preferred if a high training stimulus is intended.

Purpose The aim of this study was to investigate the outcomes of a fixed intravitreal aflibercept regimen in patients with vascular pigment epithelium detachment (vPED) secondary to age-related macular degeneration with refractory subretinal fluid. Methods A prospective, interventional case series involved 20 eyes of 20 patients with refractory subretinal fluid and vPED treated with at least three injections of intravitreal anti-VEGF prior to study inclusion. After study inclusion, patients were treated with three injections of intravitreal aflibercept 2 mg/0.05 mL monthly followed by injections every 8 weeks. Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) were evaluated at all visits. Fluorescein angiography and indocyanine green angiography were performed at baseline and quarterly. Primary outcomes were effectivity of a fixed treatment as measured in change in BCVA, PED greatest linear diameter (GLD), and PED height from baseline to month 12. In an additional post hoc analysis, vPED patients were differentiated into two groups: (1) vPED lesions that showed persistence of subretinal fluid throughout 1 year of treatment and (2) vPED lesions that showed complete resolution of subretinal fluid at least at one of the monthly performed OCT volume scans. Reflectivity values were determined in the subretinal pigment epithelium (RPE) compartment in OCT scans at baseline, month 6 and 12. Results A total of 18 patients completed the study protocol. The mean age was 74.8 ± 10.6 years, and six patients were female. The median BCVA of all patients was 72.0 ± 8.0 EDTRS letters at baseline and 72.5 ± 9.5 EDTRS letters at 12-month follow-up (p = 0.7420). The median PED height in all patients as measured in the OCT images significantly decreased from 372.0 ± 140.0 μm to 149.0 ± 142.0 μm after 12 months of treatment (p = 0.0020). Persistent subretinal fluid was present at every OCT control in six patients (group 1). Twelve patients showed resolution of subretinal fluid at least at one OCT control (group 2). Reflectivity values in the sub-RPE compartment in OCT scans were 41.48 ± 4.48 (group 1) and 42.62 ± 12.34 (group 2) at baseline (p = 0.854) and 65.88 ± 6.74 and 50.87 ± 14.11 at month 12 (p = 0.038). Conclusions Intravitreal aflibercept in refractory vPED leads to a significant reduction in PED height and disease activity as well as preservation of BCVA over 1 year. Persistent subretinal fluid was present in PED lesions with high values of reflectivity under the RPE, suggesting both a diffusion barrier and an increasing fibrovascular maturization of the choroidal neovascularization. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03370380

Background: Isometric paravertebral muscle training (IPMT) may improve mobility, pain, and quality of life (QOL) in cancer patients with spinal metastases. However, this regimen remains unproven in patients with unstable spinal metastases (USM), a population at high risk for clinical exacerbation with such interventions. Thus, we conducted this exploratory, non-blinded, randomized controlled trial (NCT02847754) to evaluate the safety/feasibility of IPMT and secondarily assess pain, bone density, pathologic fracture rate, and QOL. Methods: All patients had histologically/radiologically confirmed USM (per Taneichi score) and underwent non-operative management with 5&ndash, 10 fractions of palliative radiotherapy (RT). Randomization (1:1) groups were IPMT (intervention, INT) or muscle relaxation (control, CON), both lasted 15 min/day and started concurrently with radiotherapy. The primary endpoint was feasibility (completion of training programs three months post-RT). Secondary endpoints were pain response (Visual Analog Scale) and opioid consumption, bone density and pathologic fracture rate, and QOL (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, EORTC questionnaires). Results: Sixty patients were randomized and 56 received protocol therapy. Mean survival in both groups was 4.4 months. There were no adverse events with either training regimen. Altogether, &ge, 80% of the planned sessions were completed by 55% (n = 16/29) in CON and 67% (n = 18/27) in INT. Regarding the post-radiotherapy home-based training, &ge, 80% of planned sessions were completed by 64% (n = 9/14) of the INT cohort. There were no differences in pain scores, opioid consumption, or bone density between arms (p &gt, 0.05 for all). No difference was observed between groups regarding new pathological fractures (INT: n = 1 vs. CON: n = 3) after three months (p = 0.419). There were no QOL differences between arms (all parameters p &gt, 0.05). Conclusions: IPMT is potentially feasible for high-risk USM patients. Future trials adequately powered for relevant endpoints are thus recommended.

Objectives: To evaluate the knowledge of and attitudes toward postmortem cornea donation in living young and elderly potential donors in a German city. Method: High-school students and seniors participated in a nonrandomized prospective survey focusing on willingness to donate corneas postmortem and factors that might influence underlying specific attitudes. Statistical analysis was descriptive and included logistic regression. Results: The survey showed that 73.3% of the high-school students and 41.6% of the seniors, 53.2% of whom had already signed an advanced medical directive, felt insufficiently informed about donation. High-school students were significantly less willing to donate their corneas postmortem (p < 0.001), and fewer of them possessed a donor card (p < 0.001). High-school students specified the internet as their favored source of information about donation in 82.7% of cases, while the family physician was the first preference for 47.8% of the seniors. Conclusions: The willingness to donate and the proportion of donor card ownership were significantly lower in the high-school students than among the seniors, corresponding to their respective knowledge in matters of donation. Young people should be systematically informed about cornea donation at school, as soon as they reach the legal minimum age for donation, and primary-care physicians should provide relevant information to every new patient to aid their decision making concerning postmortem cornea donation.

Rationale: One repetition maximum (1-RM) testing is a standard strength assessment procedure in clinical exercise intervention trials. Because no adverse events (AEs) are published, expert panels usually consider it safe for patient populations. However, we here report a vertebral fracture during 1-RM testing. Patient concerns: A 69-year-old breast cancer survivor (body-mass-index 31.6 kg/m2), 3 months after primary therapy, underwent 1-RM testing within an exercise intervention trial. At the leg press, she experienced pain accompanied by a soft crackling. Diagnosis: Imaging revealed a partially unstable cover plate compression fracture of the fourth lumbar vertebra (L4) with a vertical fracture line to the base plate, an extended bone marrow edema and a relative stenosis of the spinal canal. Interventions: It was treated with an orthosis and vitamin D supplementation. Another imaging to exclude bone metastases revealed previously unknown osteoporosis. Outcomes: The patient was symptom-free 6.5 weeks after the event but did not return to exercise. Conclusion: This case challenges safety of 1-RM testing in elderly clinical populations. Lessons: Pre-exercise osteoporosis risk assessment might help reducing fracture risk. However, changing the standard procedure from 1-RM to multiple repetition maximum (x-RM) testing in studies with elderly or clinical populations would be the safest solution.

Observed response to regular exercise training differs widely between individuals even in tightly controlled research settings. However, the respective contributions of random error and true interindividual differences as well as the relative frequency of nonresponders are disputed. Specific challenges of analyses on the individual level as well as a striking heterogeneity in definitions may partly explain these inconsistent results. Repeated testing during the training phase specifically addresses the requirements of analyses on the individual level. Here we report a first implementation of this innovative design amendment in a head-to-head comparison of existing analytical approaches. To allow for comparative implementation of approaches we conducted a controlled endurance training trial (1 yr walking/jogging, 3 days/wk for 45 min with 60% heart rate reserve) in healthy, untrained subjects ( n = 36, age = 46 ± 8 yr; body mass index 24.7 ± 2.7 kg/m2; V̇o2max 36.6 ± 5.4). In the training group additional V̇o2max tests were conducted after 3, 6, and 9 mo. Duration of the control condition was 6 mo due to ethical constraints. General efficacy of the training intervention could be verified by a significant increase in V̇o2max in the training group ( P < 0.001 vs. control). Individual training response of relevant magnitude (>0.2 × baseline variability in V̇o2max) could be demonstrated by several approaches. Regarding the classification of individuals, only 11 of 20 subjects were consistently classified, demonstrating remarkable disagreement between approaches. These results are in support of relevant interindividual variability in training efficacy and stress the limitations of a responder classification. Moreover, this proof-of-concept underlines the need for tailored methodological approaches for well-defined problems. NEW & NOTEWORTHY This work reports a first implementation of a repeated testing training trial for the investigation of individual response. This design amendment was recently proposed to address specifically the statistical requirements of analyses on the individual level. Moreover, a comprehensive comparison of previously published methods exemplifies the striking heterogeneity of existing approaches.

Purpose: To compare energy requirements and substrate use for running a given distance fast versus slow under field conditions. Methods: Ten males and four females who were moderately endurance trained (32 +/- 6 yr; 71 +/- 11 kg; body mass index: 22.7 +/- 2.3 kg[middle dot]m-2; [latin capital V with dot above]O2max: 62.0 +/- 6.0 mL[middle dot]min-1[middle dot]kg-1; individual anaerobic threshold [IAT]: 13.7 +/- 1.4 km[middle dot]h-1) performed an incremental running protocol to determine IAT. Subsequently, two 8000-m runs at 70 and 95% IAT were performed on separate days in randomized order on an indoor track. Energy expenditure (EE) was measured by means of a portable metabolic device (indirect calorimetry). A meaningful difference in EE was defined as >10%. Results: EE was significantly greater during the 95% IAT run than during the 70% IAT run (2650 +/- 276 and 2554 +/- 348 kJ, respectively). However, this difference was only 3.8 +/- 4.8%. Including measurements up to 10 min postexercise, the difference rose to 5.1 +/- 4.7% (95% IAT: 2830 +/- 301 kJ; 70% IAT: 2692 +/- 368 kJ). There was no significant difference between the absolute amounts of fat oxidized during the runs (70% IAT: 26 +/- 5 g; 95% IAT: 20 +/- 5 g). During the 95% IAT run, significantly more carbohydrates were metabolized than during the 70% IAT run (108 +/- 14 and 90 +/- 5 g, respectively). The difference in EE between the two runs increased from the first to the third part of the running distance (first: no significance; second: P < 0.01; third: P < 0.001). Conclusion: Energy requirements for a commonly run distance in recreational endurance training differ significantly but not relevantly between slow and fast speeds. However, increasing total running distance might lead to larger differences.