Search

Hydropower production can cause migration delay and fish mortality, impeding the safe and timely downstream migration of diadromous fish, such as Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar) and silver eels (Anguilla anguilla). To date, only a few field performance tests, especially for eels, have evaluated the efficiency of fine-spaced angled racks associated to a surface bypass entrance to protect fish. Here, 115 salmon smolts and 65 silver eels were radio-tracked over a 2 yr period to assess passage efficiency and passage time at a hydropower intake (50 m3.s−1) retrofitted with a 20 mm rack associated to a surface bypass (2 m3.s−1). Results showed high impediment (89.6% and 96.9% for smolts and eels, respectively), and passage efficiency for the angled rack (89.1% and 93.3%), with short passage times (median, 3 and 7.5 min). However, our results highlighted a strong influence of hydrological conditions, in enhancing fish passage, especially through the bear-trap gate. We conclude that this fish passage solution, making use of existing spillways on the study site, is highly effective for both species. Special attention must, however, be paid to bar-rack design and its cleaning system to ensure fish guidance and prevent impingement or passage through the rack, especially for salmon smolts.

Hydropower energy can contribute to achieve the carbon neutrality goals, but also needs to reach environmental sustainability. Hydropower plants (HPP) constitute barriers to fish migrations that are essential for accomplishing their complete biological cycle. Fish downstream passage solutions (FDPS) have to be implemented to maximize their survival, guiding them away from the turbine intakes towards a safe passage alternative. Recent telemetry studies confirmed the efficiency of 26° inclined low bar spacing (20 mm) rack associated to surface bypasses, installed upstream HPPs, to protect downstream migrating Atlantic salmon smolts. Here we tested the efficiency of such FDPS for eel protection using radiotelemetry at four successive HPPs (with intake capacities from 28 to 45 m3.s−1) in the Ariège River (southern France). Between 52 and 74 eels, longer than 550 mm, entered the HPP intakes and 100% of them were protected from turbine passage. All eels crossed the HPP water intake using the surface bypasses, and the great majority in few minutes from their first presentation in front of the rack. These results showed that in such rack configuration, it is not necessary to add a specific bottom bypass, usually recommended for eels. We also showed the importance of optimal hydraulic conditions, mainly tangential (parallel to the rack) velocity and bypass discharge, to efficiently guide the eels towards the surface bypasses, reducing their passage time. Overall, our study provided key elements to water managers for designing an efficient FDPS for eels.

From 2010 to 2016, an evaluation of the performance of a partial-depth guide wall associated with three surface bypasses to ensure the safe downstream migration of Atlantic salmon smolts was conducted at the Tuilières power plant on the Dordogne River in southwestern France. The objectives of this study, during which 603 smolts were monitored using radio telemetry, were (i) to determine their escapement rate (passage through routes other than turbines), (ii) to analyse their behaviour faced with the structure and (iii) to assess the permeability of the guide wall as a function of turbine and spilling flows. The rate of escapement through the surface bypass routes varied from approximately 15% to 85%. The turbine flow was the main factor influencing the guide wall efficiency. The contribution of secondary bypasses, while significant for low flows, decreased rapidly with the increase in turbine flows. The vast majority of fish arrived on the two downstream bays of the wall or directly in the area of the main bypass, with the guiding effect of the guide wall becoming less noticeable with the increase of turbine flow. A modification of the depth of the guide wall in 2014 slightly improved its efficiency (by 5–10%) for low turbine flows. Logistic regression models were used to describe the evolution of the efficiency of the facilty as a function of the turbine flow and the probability of direct passage under a bay as a function of average velocity under this bay.