Search

BackgroundFull level 1 personal protective equipment (PPE) is used in various domains and contexts. Prior research has shown influences of such equipment on performance, comfort, and contamination levels. The coronavirus disease (COVID-19) pandemic forced a pervasive requirement of PPE, with little preparation, rushed deployment, inadequate time for training, and massive use by personnel who are inexperienced or not qualified in its effective use. ObjectiveThis study aims to examine the key human factors (physical and ergonomic, perceptual and cognitive) that influence the use of level 1 PPE when attending to patients with suspected or confirmed COVID-19. MethodsThe research approach consisted of a short survey disseminated to health care professionals in two countries, Israel and Portugal, with similar demographics and health care systems. The survey included 10 items with a 5-point Likert scale regarding the key human factors involved in level 1 PPE, as identified in prior research. ResultsA total of 722 respondents from Israel and 301 respondents from Portugal were included in the analysis. All the respondents reported using level 1 PPE with patients with COVID-19 in the range of several hours daily to several hours weekly. The Cronbach α was .73 for Israel and .75 for Portugal. Responses showed high levels of difficulty, with medians of 4 for items related to discomfort (n=539/688, 78% in Israel; n=328/377, 87% in Portugal), hearing (n=236/370, 64% in Portugal; n=321/642, 50% in Israel), seeing (n=697/763, 89% in Israel; n=317/376, 84% in Portugal), and doffing (n=290/374, 77% in Portugal; n=315/713, 44% in Israel). A factor analysis showed a set of strongly related variables consisting of hearing, understanding speech, and understanding the situation. This suggests that degradation in communication was strongly associated with degradation in situational awareness. A subsequent mediation analysis showed a direct effect of PPE discomfort on situational awareness (P

Background: In-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) still has a poor prognosis despite medical advancements in recent decades. Early and high-quality cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), as well as good teamwork, are important prognostic factors. There are no clear guidelines regarding the composition of a dedicated hospital CPR team. We compared outcomes of IHCA treated by a dedicated hospital CPR team compared to ward medical staff with advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) training. Methods: A single-center retrospective observational study based on the cardiopulmonary resuscitation database of Soroka University Medical Center from January 2016 until December 2019. We compared the results of resuscitations conducted by regular ward medical staff, certified in ACLS, versus those conducted by the dedicated hospital's CPR team. Results: Of the 360 CPR events analyzed, 141 (39.1%) ended in return of spontaneous circulation, 70 (19.4%) patients were alive after 24 hours, 23 (6.4%) survived for 30 days, and 18 (5%) survived to discharge. Of those who survived to discharge, 11 (61.1%) had a cerebral performance category (CPC) score of 1–2, and 7 (38.9%) had a score of 3–4 (mean 2.09). Survival-to-discharge was significantly higher in the CPR-team group compared to the ward-team group (7.6% vs. 1.9%, p = 0.013). However, with propensity score analysis the difference in survival became insignificant (RR = 1.97, 95% CI: 0.40–9.63, p = 0.40). Conclusion: We found no difference in survival between IHCA treated by a dedicated hospital CPR team compared to a standard ward team, both trained with biennial ACLS training. Nevertheless, crude survival-to-discharge was significantly higher in the CPR-team group. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Percutaneous bedside tracheostomy (PBT) is a one of the common and safe procedures in intensive care units through the world. In the present paper we published our clinical experience with a performance of PBTs in the regular ward by intensive care physicians' team. We found it safe and similar outcome in comparison to open surgical tracheostomy method in operation room by ENT team. The performance of PBT in the regular ward showed potential economic advantages in saving medical staff and operating room resources.

There is a growing body of evidence that suggests a connection between traumatic brain injury (TBI) and subsequent post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD). While the exact mechanism is unknown, we hypothesize that chronic glutamate neurotoxicity may play a role. The consumption of dietary glutamate is a modifiable factor influencing glutamate levels in the blood and, therefore, in the brain. In this systematic review, we explored the relationship between dietary glutamate and the development of post-TBI PTSD. Of the 1748 articles identified, 44 met the inclusion criteria for analysis in this review. We observed that individuals from countries with diets traditionally high in glutamate had greater odds of developing PTSD after TBI (odds ratio = 15.2, 95% confidence interval 11.69 to 19.76, p < 0.01). These findings may support the hypothesis that chronically elevated blood glutamate concentrations caused by high dietary intake invoke neurodegeneration processes that could ultimately result in PTSD. Further studies will clarify whether lowering glutamate via diet would be an effective strategy in preventing or treating post-TBI PTSD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]