Search

Background: This study analyzed the effect of walking breaks or low-volume high-intensity interval exercise (LV-HIIE) on markers of metabolic syndrome relative to a day of prolonged sitting. Methods: Twenty-five adults with excess body fat participated in this crossover trial: (1) 10-hour sitting day (SIT), (2) LV-HIIE followed by a sitting day (EX+SIT), and (3) sitting day with 5-minute walking breaks for every 20 minutes (SIT+WB). Glucose and blood pressure (BP) were measured before and 1 hour after 4 meals and 2 hours after lunch. Triglycerides were measured at baseline, 2, and 3.5 hours after lunch. Generalized mixed models were used to identify differences in the area under the curve (AUC) of BP and incremental AUC (iAUC) of glucose and triglycerides among the sessions. Results: iAUC-glucose was lower in SIT+WB than SIT (β = -35.3 mg/dL·10 h; 95% confidence interval, -52.5 to -8.2). AUC-diastolic BP was lower in SIT+WB than SIT (β = -14.1 mm Hg·10 h; 95% confidence interval, -26.5 to -1.6) and EX+SIT (β = -14.5 mm Hg·10 h; 95% confidence interval, -26.9 to -2.1). There were no differences in triglycerides and systolic BP levels among the sessions. Conclusion: Adults with excess body fat present lower glucose and diastolic BP during a day with breaks in sitting time compared with a prolonged sitting day with or without an LV-HIIE session. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We compared physiological and psychological responses between low-volume high-intensity interval training (LV-HIIT) sessions with different work-recovery durations. Ten adult males performed two LV-HIIT sessions in a randomized, counter-balanced order. Specifically, 60/60 s LV-HIIT and 30/30 s LV-HIIT. Oxygen uptake (VO2), carbon dioxide output (VCO2), ventilation (VE), respiratory exchange ratio (RER), perceived exertion (RPE), and affect were assessed. During intervals, the VO2 (3.25 ± 0.57 vs. 2.83 ± 0.50 L/min), VCO2 (3.15 ± 0.61 vs. 2.93 ± 0.58 L/min), VE (108.59 ± 27.39 vs. 94.28 ± 24.98 L/min), and RPE (15.9 ± 1.5 vs. 13.9 ± 1.5) were higher (ps ≤ 0.01), while RER (0.98 ± 0.05 vs. 1.03 ± 0.03) and affect (-0.8 ± 1.4 vs. 1.1 ± 2.0) were lower (ps ≤ 0.007) in the 60/60 s LV-HIIT. During recovery periods, VO2 (1.85 ± 0.27 vs. 2.38 ± 0.46 L/min), VCO2 (2.15 ± 0.35 vs. 2.44 ± 0.45 L/min), and affect (0.6 ± 1.7 vs. 1.7 ± 1.8) were lower (ps ≤ 0.02), while RER (1.20 ± 0.05 vs. 1.03 ± 0.05; p < 0.001) was higher in the 60/60 s LV-HIIT. Shorter LV-HIIT (30 s) elicits lower physiological response and attenuated negative affect than longer LV-HIIT (60 s). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

To investigate the joint associations of accelerometer-measured moderate-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and sedentary time (ST) with cardiometabolic risk in older adults. This cross-sectional study included 248 participants (aged 65.8 ± 5.1 years; 73.7% females). Cardiometabolic risk was defined using continuous metabolic syndrome score (cMetS). MVPA and ST were assessed by accelerometry. Participants were categorized according to their MVPA and ST levels: i) 'Inactive + High ST' (<150 min/week and > 10.6 h/day); ii) 'Inactive + Low ST' (< 150 min/week and ≤ 10.6 h/day); iii) 'Active + High ST' (≥ 150 min/week and > 10.6 h/day) and iv) 'Active + Low ST' (≥ 150 min/week and ≤ 10.6 h/day). The cut-offs for active and inactive were based on current PA guidelines. The cut-offs for low and high ST were based on the median value from this cohort. Generalized linear models were used for data analyses ('Inactive + High ST' as group reference) controlling for known cardiometabolic risk factors. The 'Active + Low ST' (β = −0.34, 95% CI –0.57, −0.11) and 'Active + High ST' (β = −0.28, 95% CI –0.55, −0.02) groups had lower cMetS compared to the 'Inactive + High ST' group (p < 0.05). No difference was found between the 'Inactive + Low ST' and 'Inactive + High ST' groups (β = −0.19, 95% CI –0.41, 0.03). Meeting MVPA recommendations (≥ 150 min/week) is associated with a lower cardiometabolic risk in older adults, even in those with high ST. • MVPA and ST are inversely associated with cardiometabolic risk in older adults. • Joint associations of MVPA and ST with cardiometabolic risk is poorly understood. • Active individuals had a lower cardiometabolic risk than the inactive with high ST. • Inactive older adults with low and high ST showed a similar cardiometabolic risk. • Older adults should be encouraged to meet appropriate MVPA levels (150+ min/week). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We compared physiological and psychological responses between low-volume high-intensity interval training (LV-HIIT) sessions with different work-recovery durations. Ten adult males performed two LV-HIIT sessions in a randomized, counter-balanced order. Specifically, 60/60 s LV-HIIT and 30/30 s LV-HIIT. Oxygen uptake (VO 2 ), carbon dioxide output (VCO 2 ), ventilation (VE), respiratory exchange ratio (RER), perceived exertion (RPE), and affect were assessed. During intervals, the VO 2 (3.25 ± 0.57 vs. 2.83 ± 0.50 L/min), VCO 2 (3.15 ± 0.61 vs. 2.93 ± 0.58 L/min), VE (108.59 ± 27.39 vs. 94.28 ± 24.98 L/min), and RPE (15.9 ± 1.5 vs. 13.9 ± 1.5) were higher (ps ≤ 0.01), while RER (0.98 ± 0.05 vs. 1.03 ± 0.03) and affect (-0.8 ± 1.4 vs. 1.1 ± 2.0) were lower (ps ≤ 0.007) in the 60/60 s LV-HIIT. During recovery periods, VO 2 (1.85 ± 0.27 vs. 2.38 ± 0.46 L/min), VCO 2 (2.15 ± 0.35 vs. 2.44 ± 0.45 L/min), and affect (0.6 ± 1.7 vs. 1.7 ± 1.8) were lower (ps ≤ 0.02), while RER (1.20 ± 0.05 vs. 1.03 ± 0.05; p < 0.001) was higher in the 60/60 s LV-HIIT. Shorter LV-HIIT (30 s) elicits lower physiological response and attenuated negative affect than longer LV-HIIT (60 s).