1. An accessible scheme for monitoring free‐roaming cat population trends
- Author
-
Hila Wolf, Eyal Klement, Lior Azriel, Tal Raz, and I. Gunther
- Subjects
0106 biological sciences ,Population ,fertility control ,trap–neuter–return ,010603 evolutionary biology ,01 natural sciences ,03 medical and health sciences ,Free roaming ,lcsh:QH540-549.5 ,Statistics ,Prevalence ratio ,education ,Transect ,Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics ,Original Research ,030304 developmental biology ,Nature and Landscape Conservation ,Mathematics ,0303 health sciences ,education.field_of_study ,free‐roaming cats ,Ecology ,Trap neuter return ,sterilization ,Neutering ,population monitoring ,lcsh:Ecology ,Free roaming cats ,Urban environment ,population control - Abstract
Free‐roaming cats (FRCs) form nondomiciliary population groups that might lead to adverse environmental effects, as well as to welfare impairment of the cats themselves. Though criticized by ecologists, for the last two decades, the trap–neuter–return (TNR) programs were often employed aiming to manage these populations. At present, no accepted and accessible monitoring scheme exists to determine the effectiveness of those programs. In the current study, we present the reliability and validity of an applicable monitoring scheme, as an adjunct tool for a TNR program of FRC in an urban environment. The monitoring scheme is based on cat observation counts along randomly chosen transects. Fifty‐four transects were repeatedly walked for three years, between 2012‐2014, in 27 neighborhoods within an urban area of 19.3 Km2. Cat numbers counted in the 2014 observations were significantly higher than cat numbers found in the 2012 observations (prevalence ratio = 1.258, CI95%= 1.198–1.322, p, The presentation of the reliability and validity of an applicable monitoring scheme of free‐roaming cats in an urban environment.
- Published
- 2020