1. Reduction of missed thoracic findings in emergency whole-body computed tomography using artificial intelligence assistance
- Author
-
Johannes Rueckel, Frederik F. Strobl, Thomas Geyer, Sophia Kaestle, Bastian O. Sabel, Nicola Fink, Vincent Schwarze, Jonathan I. Sperl, Michael Ingrisch, Boj Hoppe, Jens Ricke, and Jan Rudolph
- Subjects
Lung ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,business.industry ,medicine.medical_treatment ,Computed tomography ,medicine.disease ,Malignancy ,Polytrauma ,030218 nuclear medicine & medical imaging ,03 medical and health sciences ,0302 clinical medicine ,medicine.anatomical_structure ,Radiological weapon ,medicine ,Original Article ,Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and imaging ,Artificial intelligence ,business ,Whole body ,030217 neurology & neurosurgery ,Reduction (orthopedic surgery) ,Artery - Abstract
Background Radiology reporting of emergency whole-body computed tomography (CT) scans is time-critical and therefore involves a significant risk of pathology under-detection. We hypothesize a relevant number of initially missed secondary thoracic findings that would have been detected by an artificial intelligence (AI) software platform including several pathology-specific AI algorithms. Methods This retrospective proof-of-concept-study consecutively included 105 shock-room whole-body CT scans. Image data was analyzed by platform-bundled AI-algorithms, findings were reviewed by radiology experts and compared with the original radiologist's reports. We focused on secondary thoracic findings, such as cardiomegaly, coronary artery plaques, lung lesions, aortic aneurysms and vertebral fractures. Results We identified a relevant number of initially missed findings, with their quantification based on 105 analyzed CT scans as follows: up to 25 patients (23.8%) with cardiomegaly or borderline heart size, 17 patients (16.2%) with coronary plaques, 34 patients (32.4%) with aortic ectasia, 2 patients (1.9%) with lung lesions classified as "recommended to control" and 13 initially missed vertebral fractures (two with an acute traumatic origin). A high number of false positive or non-relevant AI-based findings remain problematic especially regarding lung lesions and vertebral fractures. Conclusions We consider AI to be a promising approach to reduce the number of missed findings in clinical settings with a necessary time-critical radiological reporting. Nevertheless, algorithm improvement is necessary focusing on a reduction of "false positive" findings and on algorithm features assessing the finding relevance, e.g., fracture age or lung lesion malignancy.
- Published
- 2021
- Full Text
- View/download PDF