Search

Data regarding the clinical outcomes of men with metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) who harbor homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene alterations have not been fully characterized. Here, we examine a cohort of mHSPC patients who underwent genomic sequencing to evaluate the impact of HRR gene alterations on time to castrate resistance and other outcomes. We found that the presence of an HRR gene alteration is associated with a shorter time to mCRPC. INTRODUCTION: The homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathway is a frequently mutated pathway in advanced prostate cancer. The clinical course of patients with HRR gene alterations who have metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) has not been fully characterized. Here, we examine the outcomes of men with mHSPC with HRR alterations. METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective analysis of men with mHSPC who underwent next generation sequencing. The primary objective was to assess the time from diagnosis of mHSPC to metastatic castrate resistance prostate cancer (mCRPC) in patients with pathogenic HRR alterations compared to individuals lacking these alterations. Key secondary objectives included time to mCRPC in prespecified cohorts, PSA response, and overall survival. RESULTS: 151 men with mHSPC were identified for the study. 24% (N = 37) had pathogenic HRR gene alterations detected with the most common alterations found in BRCA2 (n = 15), ATM (n = 10), and CDK12 (n = 7). Time to mCRPC was significantly decreased in patients with HRR gene alterations versus those without such alterations (12.7 vs. 16.1 months, HR 1.95, P = .02). In multivariate analysis, the effect of HRR gene alterations on time to CRPC remained significant when adjusting for age, mHSPC therapy, the volume of disease, the presence of visceral metastases, and PSA (adjusted HR 1.69, P = .02). Stratified by specific HRR gene alteration, patients with BRCA2 or CDK12 had significantly decreased time to mCRPC compared to other HRR alterations. CONCLUSION: HRR gene alterations are associated with the worse outcomes in mHSPC with significantly shorter time to mCRPC. Given the established role of Poly (ADP-ribose) Polymerase (PARP) inhibitors in mCRPC, these data highlight an opportunity to examine PARP inhibitors earlier in the clinical course for prostate cancer patients. Ongoing prospective studies will further validate the role of PARP inhibitors in mHSPC patients.

BackgroundSipuleucel-T (sip-T) is a Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved autologous cellular immunotherapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). We hypothesized that combining sip-T with interleukin (IL)-7, a homeostatic cytokine that enhances both B and T cell development and proliferation, would augment and prolong antigen-specific immune responses against both PA2024 (the immunogen for sip-T) and prostatic acid phosphatase (PAP).MethodsFifty-four patients with mCRPC treated with sip-T were subsequently enrolled and randomized 1:1 into observation (n=26) or IL-7 (n=28) arms of a phase II clinical trial (NCT01881867). Recombinant human (rh) IL-7 (CYT107) was given weekly×4. Immune responses were evaluated using flow cytometry, mass cytometry (CyTOF), interferon (IFN)-γ ELISpot, 3H-thymidine incorporation, and ELISA.ResultsTreatment with rhIL-7 was well tolerated. For the rhIL-7-treated, but not observation group, statistically significant lymphocyte subset expansion was found, with 2.3–2.6-fold increases in CD4+T, CD8+T, and CD56bright NK cells at week 6 compared with baseline. No significant differences in PA2024 or PAP-specific T cell responses measured by IFN-γ ELISpot assay were found between rhIL-7 and observation groups. However, antigen-specific T cell proliferative responses and humoral IgG and IgG/IgM responses significantly increased over time in the rhIL-7-treated group only. CyTOF analyses revealed pleiotropic effects of rhIL-7 on lymphocyte subsets, including increases in CD137 and intracellular IL-2 and IFN-γ expression. While not powered to detect clinical outcomes, we found that 31% of patients in the rhIL-7 group had prostate specific antigen (PSA) doubling times of >6 months, compared with 14% in the observation group.ConclusionsTreatment with rhIL-7 led to a significant expansion of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, and CD56bright natural killer (NK) cells compared with observation after treatment with sip-T. The rhIL-7 treatment also led to improved antigen-specific humoral and T cell proliferative responses over time as well as to increased expression of activation markers and beneficial cytokines. This is the first study to evaluate the use of rhIL-7 after sip-T in patients with mCRPC and demonstrates encouraging results for combination approaches to augment beneficial immune responses.

There has been considerable interest in ctDNA next generation sequencing platforms to assess genomic alterations in mCRPC given its accessibility and identification of temporal genomic data.In this retrospective analysis, we analyzed 63 patients who underwent ctDNA genomic profiling during their mCRPC disease course using a CLIA-certified commercial assay. The primary objective was to assess the feasibility of commercial ctDNA analysis in a real world mCRPC cohort. Key secondary objectives included assessment of the landscape of pathogenic ctDNA alterations and the prognostic significance of ctDNA detection on overall survival (OS).Among the cohort, at the time of ctDNA collection, median age was 70 years, and 47.6% (N = 30/63) had bone-only metastases. ctDNA was detected in the majority of patients with at least 1 pathogenic alteration detected in 90.5% (N = 57/63) of individuals. The most common alterations detected were in AR, TP53, and PIK3CA. Actionable alterations with FDA-approved therapies were found in 15.8% (N = 10) of the cohort. The presence of ≤ 1 versus1 alteration on ctDNA analysis was strongly associated with inferior OS with a median OS of 26.1 versus 8.8 months, respectively (HR = 7.0, 95% CI, 2.2-23.1, P.001). In multivariate analysis, the number of detected alterations remained a significant predictor for OS. Lastly, there was weak correlation between Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA), and ctDNA characteristics.ctDNA is a viable next generation sequencing (NGS) platform in mCRPC and can be utilized to identify actionable alterations. The presence and extent of ctDNA alterations appear to be prognostic of OS in mCRPC.

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE:Given the technical limitations of obtaining tissue next-generation sequencing, there has been considerable interest in blood ctDNA to assess genomic alterations in mCRPC...

This selection from the NCCN Guidelines for Adolescent and Young Adult (AYA) Oncology focuses on treatment and management considerations for AYA patients with cancer. Compared with older adults with cancer, AYA patients have unique needs regarding treatment, fertility counseling, psychosocial and behavioral issues, and supportive care services. The complete version of the NCCN Guidelines for AYA Oncology addresses additional aspects of caring for AYA patients, including risk factors, screening, diagnosis, and survivorship.

Neoadjuvant Targeted Molecular Therapy in the setting of localized and locally advanced renal cell carcinoma has emerged as a strategy to render primary renal tumors amenable to planned surgical resection in settings where radical resection or nephron-sparing surgery was not thought to be safe or feasible. Presurgical tumor reduction has been demonstrated in a number of studies including a recently published randomized double-blind placebo-controlled study, and an expanding body of literature suggests benefit in select patients. Nonetheless, most reports are small phase II clinical trials or retrospective reports. Thus, large randomized clinical trial data are not present to support this approach, and guidelines for use of presurgical therapy have not been promulgated. The advent of immunomodulation through checkpoint inhibition represents an exciting horizon for neoadjuvant strategies. This article reviews the current status and future prospects of neoadjuvant therapy in nonmetastatic renal cell carcinoma.

To evaluate change in platelet count as an indicator of response to primary tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).We conducted a multicentre retrospective analysis of patients with mRCC undergoing primary TKI therapy from May 2005 to August 2014. Change in platelet count was defined as post-treatment platelet count after the first cycle of treatment minus the pretreatment platelet count. Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours were used to define partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD). Analysis was conducted between subgroups with stable/increased (+ΔPlt) and decreased (-ΔPlt) counts. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), determined using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Multivariable analysis was conducted for risk factors associated with PD.A total of 115 patients with mRCC were analysed, of whom 19 (16.6%) had a +ΔPlt and 96 (83%) a -ΔPlt. More patients with a +ΔPlt had a Karnofsky score80 (42.1 vs 14.6%; P = 0.005) and2 metastatic sites (78.9 vs 51%; P = 0.041). More patients with +ΔPlt than with -ΔPlt had PD (89.4 vs 19.1%; P0.001) and more of those with -ΔPlt than with +ΔPlt had SD/PR (80.9 vs 10.6%; P0.001). Multivariable analysis showed that +ΔPlt (odds ratio [OR] 5.36, P0.001), Karnofsky score80 (OR 2.96, P = 0.002) and2 metastatic sites at presentation (OR 1.87, P = 0.013) were risk factors for PD. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a lower 5-year OS in patients with +ΔPlt than in those with -ΔPlt (23 vs 53%; P0.0001). +ΔPlt had a sensitivity of 48.6%, a specificity of 97.4%, a positive predictive value of 89.5% and a negative predictive value of 80.9% for PD.Patients with a -ΔPlt were more likely to respond to TKI therapy and had longer OS. +ΔPlt above baseline had a high specificity for PD after primary TKI. Further investigation is required to determine the utility of ΔPlt.

Background We analyzed outcomes of neoadjuvant sunitinib in patients with renal-cell carcinoma (RCC) and inferior vena caval (IVC) tumor and compared outcomes to patients who did not undergo neoadjuvant therapy before surgery. Patients and Methods We performed a multicenter retrospective comparison of RCC patients with IVC tumor who underwent neoadjuvant sunitinib before surgery versus those who did not. Response to sunitinib was defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Primary outcome was cancer-specific survival. Secondary outcomes included overall survival. Multivariate analysis was performed to identify risk factors associated with primary and secondary outcomes. Kaplan-Meier analysis compared survival in neoadjuvant and primary surgery groups. Results Data of 53 patients were analyzed (19 neoadjuvant sunitinib, 34 primary surgery; median follow-up, 58 months). Eighteen (9 in each group, P = .143) had metastatic RCC. There was no difference in IVC tumor level between the 2 groups (P = .76). After neoadjuvant sunitinib, median primary tumor decreased size from 8.1 to 6.8 cm, and IVC tumor decreased by 1.3 cm. IVC tumor level decreased in 8 (42.1%) of 19 and was stable in 10 (52.6%) of 19; 5 (26.3%) of 19 experienced partial response. Similar proportions of patients underwent robot-assisted or minimally invasive approaches (P = .351), and no differences were noted in complications (P = .194). Multivariate analysis showed neoadjuvant sunitinib was associated with improved cancer-specific survival (odds ratio = 3.28; P = .021). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated significantly longer median cancer-specific survival (72 vs. 38 months, P = .023) for neoadjuvant sunitinib. Conclusion Neoadjuvant sunitinib was associated with a reduction in primary tumor and thrombus size as well as improved survival. Further investigation is needed to determine the utility of neoadjuvant sunitinib in RCC with IVC tumor.

Background Second-line treatment options for patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (UC) are limited. Fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) is dysregulated in UC by activating mutations or protein overexpression in non-mutant tumours. In this study, the efficacy, pharmacodynamics and safety of dovitinib—a broad-targeted inhibitor of tyrosine kinases, including FGFR3—were evaluated in patients with previously treated advanced UC with and without FGFR3 mutations. Methods Forty-four adults with advanced UC who had progressed after one to three platinum-based and/or combination chemotherapy regimens were classified as having mutant ( FGFR3 MUT ; n =12), wild-type ( FGFR3 WT ; n =31), or unknown ( n =1) FGFR3 status. Patients received 500mg dovitinib once daily on a 5-days-on/2-days-off schedule. The primary end-point of this two-stage study was the investigator-assessed overall response rate (ORR). Results Most of the patients were men (75%) and over half of the patients were aged ⩾65years (61%). All patients had received ⩾1 prior antineoplastic therapy for UC. The study was terminated at the end of stage 1, when it was determined by investigator review that the ORR of both the FGFR3 MUT (0%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.0–26.5) and FGFR3 WT (3.2%; 95% CI, 0.1–16.7) groups did not meet the criteria to continue to stage 2. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events, suspected to be study-drug related, included thrombocytopenia (9%), fatigue (9%), and asthenia (9%). Conclusion Although generally well tolerated, dovitinib has very limited single-agent activity in patients with previously treated advanced UC, regardless of FGFR3 mutation status. clinicaltrials.gov NCT00790426.

Background Sunitinib might optimize the feasibility of partial nephrectomy (PN) for complex renal tumors with imperative indications. We compared the renal functional outcomes of patients with complex renal masses who had undergone sunitinib before PN with those of patients who had not required neoadjuvant sunitinib before PN. Patients and Methods We performed a multicenter retrospective analysis of patients with renal cell carcinoma who had undergone PN for a complex renal mass (R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score, 10-12) and imperative indications from January 2012 to July 2014. Neoadjuvant sunitinib was used in cases for which PN was not considered feasible. The cohort was divided into those patients who had undergone PN without neoadjuvant sunitinib and those who had undergone PN after sunitinib (no-neoadjuvant vs. neoadjuvant). The change in tumor size and R.E.N.A.L. score were assessed. The primary outcome was the change in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (ΔeGFR) from preoperatively to the last postoperative follow-up visit. Results The data from 125 consecutive patients were analyzed (47 neoadjuvant and 78 no-neoadjuvant; median follow-up, 21 months). The neoadjuvant plus PN patients had had a greater median tumor size preoperatively (7.2 vs. 6 cm; P = .045). Sunitinib caused a significant decrease in the median tumor size (from 7.2 to 5.8 cm [19.4%]; P = .012) and R.E.N.A.L. score (from 11 to 9; P = .001). No significant differences were found between the neoadjuvant and no-neoadjuvant groups in the ischemia time ( P = .413) or incidence of complications ( P = .728). The median ΔeGFR was similar (neoadjuvant, 6.4; no-neoadjuvant, 6.1; P = .534). Linear regression analysis for factors associated with an increasing ΔeGFR demonstrated increasing age (estimate, −0.074; P = .009) increasing body mass index (estimate, −0.087; P = .043), and decreasing baseline eGFR (estimate, −0.104; P = .02) as significant factors. Conclusion The use of neoadjuvant sunitinib might facilitate complex PN and result in renal functional outcomes similar to those of patients with a complex renal mass who had not required neoadjuvant sunitinib.

BACKGROUND: Preliminary data suggest a potential decreased benefit of docetaxel in patients with metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who previously received abiraterone acetate, a novel androgen synthesis inhibitor (ASI). Cancer and Leukemia Group B (CALGB) trial 90401 (Alliance), a phase 3 trial in patients with mCRPC who received docetaxel-based chemotherapy, offered the opportunity to evaluate effect of prior ketoconazole, an earlier generation ASI, on clinical outcomes after docetaxel. METHODS: In CALGB trial 90401, 1050 men with chemotherapy-naive mCRPC were randomized to receive treatment with docetaxel and prednisone that included either bevacizumab or placebo. In total, 1005 men (96%) had data available regarding prior ketoconazole therapy.

To compare outcomes of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) patients who underwent primary cytoreductive nephrectomy (CRN), followed by adjuvant sunitinib therapy, vs those who underwent primary sunitinib therapy before planned CRN.This was a multi-institutional retrospective analysis of 35 mRCC patients from June 2005 to August 2009 (median follow-up, 28.5 months): 17 underwent primary CRN, followed by adjuvant sunitinib (group 1); 18 underwent primary sunitinib therapy, followed by planned CRN (group 2). Response to therapy was determined using Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Group 2 patients who had partial response (PR)/stable disease (SD) proceeded to CRN (group 2 +CRN). Group 2 patients who progressed were treated with salvage systemic therapy (group 2 no-CRN). Primary and secondary outcomes were disease-specific survival (DSS) and overall survival (OS).Patient demographic and tumor characteristics were similar. The groups had similar rates of DSS and OS on univariate analysis (P = .318 and P = .181). In group 2, 11 (61%) had PR/DS; 7 (39%) progressed. Mean times to disease-specific death in group 1, group 2 (+CRN), and group 2 (no-CRN) were 29.2, 4.6, and 28.7 months, respectively (P = .025). Kaplan-Meier analysis of DSS and OS demonstrated significant improvement in group 2 (+CRN) vs group 1 vs group 2 (no-CRN; P .001), which remained significant on multivariate regression.Nonresponders to primary sunitinib therapy had a poor prognosis. Offering CRN, if safely feasible, combined with sunitinib, was associated with improved disease-specific outcome in mRCC. Responders to primary sunitinib who underwent CRN had better DSS and OS than patients who underwent primary CRN, followed by sunitinib. Further investigation is required to assess the role, timing, and sequencing of targeted therapy and CRN in treatment of mRCC.

To compare surgical complications and tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI)-toxicities in patients who underwent primary cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) followed by adjuvant TKI therapy versus those who underwent neoadjuvant TKI therapy prior to planned CN for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC).Two-center retrospective analysis. Sixty-one mRCC patients underwent TKI therapy with sunitinib between July 2007 to January 2014. Patients were divided into three groups: primary CN followed by adjuvant TKI (n = 27, Group 1), neoadjuvant TKI prior to CN (n = 21, Group 2), and primary TKI alone (no surgery, n = 13, Group 3). Primary outcome was frequency and severity of surgical complications (Clavien). Secondary outcome was frequency and severity of TKI-related toxicities (NIH Common Toxicity Criteria). Multivariable analysis was carried out for factors associated with complications.There were no significant differences in demographics, ECOG status, and median number TKI cycles (p = 0.337). Mean tumor size (cm) was larger in Group 3 (12.8) than Group 2 (8.9) and Group 1 (9.3), p = 0.014. TKI-related toxicities occurred in 100%, 90.5%, and 88.9% in Group 3, Group 2, and Group 1 (p = 0.469). There was no difference in incidence of high grade (p = 0.967) and low grade (p = 0.380) TKI-toxicities. Overall surgical complication rate was similar between Group 2 (47.6%) and Group 1 (33.3%), p = 0.380. Group 2 had more high grade surgical complications (28.6%) than Group 1 (0%), p = 0.004. Multivariable analysis demonstrated increasing age was independently associated with development of surgical complications (HR 1.059, p = 0.040).Patients receiving neoadjuvant TKI therapy prior to CN experienced more high grade surgical complications than patients who underwent primary CN. Potential for increased high grade surgical complications requires further investigation and may impact pretreatment counseling.

Dose escalation with intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for carcinoma of the prostate has augmented the need for accurate prostate localization prior to dose delivery. Daily planar kilovoltage (kV) imaging is a low-dose image-guidance technique that is prevalent among radiation oncologists. However, clinical outcomes evaluating the benefit of daily kV imaging are lacking. The purpose of this study was to report our clinical experience, including prostate motion and gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) toxicities, using this modality. A retrospective analysis of 100 patients treated consecutively between December 2005 and March 2008 with definitive external beam IMRT for T1c-T4 disease were included in this analysis. Prescription doses ranged from 74–78 Gy (median, 76) in 2 Gy fractions and were delivered following daily prostate localization using on-board kV imaging (OBI) to localize gold seed fiducial markers within the prostate. Acute and late toxicities were graded as per the NCI CTCAEv3.0. The median follow-up was 22 months. The magnitude and direction of prostate displacement and daily shifts in three axes are reported. Of note, 9.1% and 12.9% of prostate displacements were ≥ 5 mm in the anterior-posterior and superior-inferior directions, respectively. Acute grade 2 GI and GU events occurred in 11% and 39% of patients, respectively, however no grade 3 or higher acute GI or GU events were observed. Regarding late toxicity, 2% and 17% of patients developed grade 2 toxicities, and similarly no grade 3 or higher events had occurred by last follow-up. Thus, kV imaging detected a substantial amount of inter-fractional displacement and may help reduce toxicity profiles, especially high grade events, by improving the accuracy of dose delivery.

Study type – Therapy (case series) Level of Evidence 4 OBJECTIVE To investigate efficacy of neoadjuvant tyrosine kinase-inhibitor therapy (TKI) before imperative nephron-sparing surgery (NSS), as NSS in patients with large locally advanced or centrally located tumours can be challenging, and TKI therapy might result in a reduction of primary tumour burden and increase the feasibility of NSS. PATIENTS AND METHODS This was a multicentre retrospective review and prospective pilot study of patients undergoing neoadjuvant sunitinib before planned NSS from February 2006 to February 2009. All patients underwent confirmatory biopsy for clear cell renal cell carcinoma. Patients received two 28-day cycles of sunitinib before NSS. Demographics/tumour characteristics, tumour response (by the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors), outcomes and complications were analysed. RESULTS Twelve patients (seven men and five women; mean age 60.1 years, tumours on 14 renal units) were given TKI before NSS for imperative indications. The mean pretreatment tumour diameter was 7.1 cm; all patients had a decrease in size of the primary tumour after TKI, with a mean reduction in maximum diameter of 1.5 cm (21.1%). Four of 14 and 10 of 14 primary tumours had a partial response and stable disease after TKI. NSS was achievable in all 14 kidneys. Four patients had a concurrent metastasectomy. The mean warm ischaemia time was 22.5 min; postoperative dialysis was not required in any patients. Final pathology revealed negative tumour margins in all 14 tumours. The mean creatinine and estimated glomerular filtration rate (before/after NSS) were 1.34/1.40 mg/dL (P = 0.431) and 57.7/53.4 mL/min/1.73 m2 (P = 0.475), respectively. At a mean follow-up of 23.9 months, 10 of the 12 patients were alive, one died from metastatic RCC and none required dialysis. Three of the 14 renal units developed delayed urinary leaks, all in patients who also received postoperative sunitinib. All leaks resolved with conservative measures. CONCLUSIONS Neoadjuvant TKI followed by NSS is safe and feasible, with all patients achieving a reduction in maximum tumour diameter, and with NSS being achievable with negative margins and with no requirement for postoperative dialysis. Further investigation is required.

lymphadenopathy (HR 1.82, P < 0.001), number of metastatic sites (HR 1.69, P 1⁄4 0.001), hemoglobin (HR 1.47, P 1⁄4 0.017), neutrophil (HR 1.78, P1⁄4 0.033), corrected calcium (HR 1.96, P1⁄4 0.022), and time from diagnosis to treatment (HR 1.68, P 1⁄4 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: We found that complete metastasectomy performed before targeted therapy significantly increased overall survival in patients with mRCC. If surgically resectable, aggressive metastasectomy should be considered.

with significant morbidity, yet there are no prognostic tools for preoperative assessment of morbidity and oncologic outcomes in these patients. Our goal was to develop an accurate multivariable predictive model for survival outcomes and complications to aid decision making in the pre-operative setting. METHODS: We identified patients who underwent surgery for RCC with suprahepatic tumor thrombus extension from 2000-2013 at 4 tertiary centers. A Cox proportional hazard model was employed for analysis of overall survival, and multivariable logistic regression for major complications within 90 days of surgery ( Clavien 3A). Nomograms were internally calibrated by bootstrap resampling method. RESULTS: 50 patients with level III and 89 with level IV thrombus were identified. During a median follow-up of 24 months, 83 patients (59.7%) died. Major complications were reported in 49 patients (35.5%). Distant metastases, ECOG performance status, preoperative systemic symptoms, tumor size, and elevated pre-operative alkaline phosphatase were associated with overall survival on univariable analysis. Factors associated with increased risk of major complications on univariable analysis included preoperative systemic symptoms, level 4 thrombus, elevated alkaline phosphatase and aspartate transaminase. Preoperative nomograms achieved a concordance index of 0.83 for both overall survival and major complications. CONCLUSIONS: We have developed and internally validated accurate pre-operative models for the prediction of survival and major complications in RCC patients with suprahepatic IVC thrombus. If externally validated, these tools may have value in preoperative patient counseling and clinical trial design.

190 Background: The optimal sequence and combination of life-extending anticancer therapies in mCRPC pts remains unknown. Sipuleucel-T (sip-T), an autologous cellular immunotherapy approved for the therapy of asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) pts, was evaluated in combination with abiraterone acetate and prednisone (abi) in the phase II STAMP trial (NCT01487863), with pts randomly assigned to receive CON sip-T + abi or SEQ sip-T followed by abi. The combination was well-tolerated and did not alter the immune response parameters that correlate with overall survival (OS) (Small Clin Can Res 2015). Here, we present long-term follow-up of clinical outcomes, including OS. Methods: mCRPC pts were randomized 1:1 to CON or SEQ therapy with sip-T and abi. Abi began 1 day after (CON) or at wk 10 (SEQ) after the first sip-T infusion and continued for 26 wk of therapy, after which continued abi therapy was permitted. Long-term clinical outcomes included OS, disease-specific death (DSS), progressive disease (PD), time to first anticancer intervention (tACI), and safety. Results: 69 pts were enrolled (35 CON; 34 SEQ). Median OS was 34.0 mo (95% CI, 24.4-not estimable [NE]; 30.0 mo CON; 34.2 mo SEQ; p = 0.921), and median time to DSS was not reached (CON vs SEQ; p = 0.733). Median time to PD was 17.3 mo (95% CI, 9.7–NE; 17.7 mo CON vs 13.9 mo SEQ; p = 0.914; consistent with higher rates of abi discontinuation due to PD in SEQ [26.5% vs 14.3% in CON]). tACI was similar between arms at 15.4 mo (95% CI, 11.0–19.9). No new safety signals were observed with the combination, and no discernable difference in clinical outcomes was observed with CON or SEQ treatments. Conclusions: Long-term follow-up data confirm that sip-T + CON or SEQ abi is well-tolerated, with no new safety signals. No clear differences were observed in clinical outcomes between arms, although the study was not powered to detect these differences. Future and more appropriately powered studies on the effect of sip-T + continuous abi for responding pts may provide further insights on the benefit of combination therapy. Clinical trial information: NCT01487863.

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is among the most prevalent malignancies in the USA. Most RCCs are sporadic, but hereditary syndromes associated with RCC account for 2–3 % of cases and include von Hippel-Lindau, hereditary leiomyomatosis, Birt-Hogg-Dube, tuberous sclerosis, hereditary papillary RCC, and familial renal carcinoma. In the past decade, our understanding of the genetic mutations associated with sporadic forms of RCC has increased considerably, with the most common mutations in clear cell RCC seen in the VHL, PBRM1, BAP1, and SETD2 genes. Among these, BAP1 mutations are associated with aggressive disease and decreased survival. Several targeted therapies for advanced RCC have been approved and include sunitinib, sorafenib, pazopanib, axitinib (tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGFR) activity), everolimus, and temsirolimus (TKIs that inhibit mTORC1, the downstream part of the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway). High-dose interleukin 2 (IL-2) immunotherapy and the combination of bevacizumab plus interferon-α are also approved treatments. At present, there are no predictive genetic markers to direct therapy for RCC, perhaps because the vast majority of trials have been evaluated in unselected patient populations, with advanced metastatic disease. This review will focus on our current understanding of the molecular genetics of RCC, and how this may inform therapeutics.

Purpose: Patients question whether multiple biopsy sessions cause worse prostate cancer outcomes. Therefore, we investigated whether there is an association between the number of prior biopsy sessions and biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy.Materials and Methods: Men in the SEARCH (Shared Equal Access Regional Cancer Hospital) database who underwent radical prostatectomy between 1988 and 2010 after a known number of prior biopsies were included in the analysis. Number of biopsy sessions (range 1 to 8) was examined as a continuous and categorical (1, 2 and 3 to 8) variable. Biochemical recurrence was defined as a prostate specific antigen greater than 0.2 ng/ml, 2 values at 0.2 ng/ml or secondary treatment for an increased prostate specific antigen. The association between number of prior biopsy sessions and biochemical recurrence was analyzed using the Cox proportional hazards model. Kaplan-Meier estimates of freedom from biochemical recurrence were compared among the groups.Results: Of the...

Background: Activation of the hepatocyte growth factor (HGF)/mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor receptor (MET) pathway promotes tumor growth, invasion and dissemination. Emibetuzumab is a humanized IgG4 monoclonal antibody that binds to and inhibits ligand-dependent and ligand-independent activation of MET. In the first-in-human dose escalation study NCT0128756, emibetuzumab demonstrated favorable tolerability when administered up to 2000mg Q2W IV in unselected patients. The study was expanded to evaluate emibetuzumab in expansion cohorts for patients with tumors positive for MET expression. Methods: Patients with locally advanced or metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) with bone metastasis, renal cell carcinoma (RCC), non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) received 2000 mg emibetuzumab Q2W IV on a 28-day cycle. RCC, NSCLC, and HCC patients were required to have measurable disease as defined by RECIST v1.1 and have MET positive tumors (≥50% of cells to be ≥2+ for MET expression) as determined by a MET IHC assay (Ventana). The objectives were to evaluate the safety and activity of emibetuzumab in patients with MET positive tumors. Additional objectives included pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD). Results: A total of 62 patients received emibetuzumab across the 4 cohorts: CRPC n = 15, RCC n = 19, NSCLC n = 19,and HCC n = 9, with a median of prior systemic oncology therapies of 6, 3, 5, and 3, respectively. Common possibly related treatment-emergent adverse events included fatigue (29% all grades, 3% Gr3/4), nausea (13% all grades, no Gr3/4), edema of limbs (8% all grades, 2% Gr3/4), and anorexia (8%, no Gr3/4) and were similar among cohorts. No evidence of clinical activity was observed in CRPC patients. For RCC, NSCLC, and HCC patients with MET positive tumors, an overall disease control rate (DCR = partial response [PR] + stable disease [SD]) of 32% (15/47) was observed. In the individual cohorts, DCR was 26% (5/19) in RCC, 26% (5/19) in NSCLC, and 56% (5/9) in HCC. The median duration of disease stabilization in the 3 cohorts was: 4.2 months (range 1.6-24.6) in RCC, 3.9 months (range 2.5-6.4) in NSCLC, and 3.7 months (range 1.2-6.6) in HCC. One PR was observed in an HCC patient with MET amplification. After a single dose of 2000 mg emibetuzumab, PK parameters were similar among these cohorts and also comparable to patients treated at this dose during dose escalation. Conclusions: In cohorts enriched for tumor MET expression, limited single-agent activity of emibetuzumab was observed indicating that MET positivity by IHC (Ventana assay) at the cut-point employed here might not be a sufficient predictive biomarker to select patients receiving benefit from emibetuzumab monotherapy for the tumor types studied. Further evaluation of biomarkers/assays to identify patients who may benefit from treatment with emibetuzumab may be warranted. Citation Format: Michaela S. Banck, Rashmi Chugh, Ronald B. Natale, Alain Algazi, Bradley C. Carthon, Lee S. Rosen, Michael E. Menefee, Andrew Xiuxuan Zhu, Takami Sato, Brian Moser, P. Kellie Turner, Jay Tuttle, Xuejing Aimee Wang, Volker Wacheck, Frederick E. Millard. Phase 1 results of emibetuzumab (LY2875358), a bivalent MET antibody, in patients with advanced castration-resistant prostate cancer, and MET positive renal cell carcinoma, non-small cell lung cancer, and hepatocellular carcinoma. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC International Conference: Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2015 Nov 5-9; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2015;14(12 Suppl 2):Abstract nr A55.

Purpose: Increased clearance of drugs, such as oral cyclosporine, that are CYP3A and/or ABCB1 (P-gp/MDR1) substrates was reported in African-American compared with Caucasian patients. We hypothesized that the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of docetaxel, an i.v. administered cytotoxic and substrate for CYP3A4, CYP3A5, and ABCB1, would differ between African-American and Caucasian patients. Experimental Design: We investigated population pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics and the pharmacogenetics of CYP3A4, CYP3A5, and ABCB1 in African-American and Caucasian cancer patients who received docetaxel 75 or 100 mg/m2 as a 1-h i.v. infusion. Plasma docetaxel concentrations were measured by high-performance liquid chromatography. Clinical toxicity and absolute neutrophil count (ANC) were monitored on days 8, 15, and 22 postadministration of docetaxel. Using a limited sampling strategy and nonlinear mixed-effects modeling, each patient's docetaxel clearance was estimated. Genotyping for known polymorphisms in CYP3A4, CYP3A5, and ABCB1 was done. Results: We enrolled 109 patients: 40 African-Americans (26 males; 14 females), with a median age of 61 years (range, 29-73), and 69 Caucasians (43 males; 26 females), with a median age of 63 years (range, 38-81). There was no difference in the geometric mean docetaxel clearance between African-American patients [40.3 L/h; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 19.3-84.1] and Caucasian patients (41.8 L/h; 95% CI, 22.0-79.7; P = 0.6). We observed no difference between African-American and Caucasian patients in the percentage decrease in ANC nor were docetaxel pharmacokinetic parameters related to the genotypes studied. Conclusions: Docetaxel clearance and its associated myelosuppression were similar in African-American and Caucasian cancer patients.

Telomerase reverse transcriptase (TRT) is the first bona fide common tumor antigen. While several 9mer peptides of the human TRT have been identified for HLA-A2, little information exists on peptides for the remaining HLA types. Here, we used a multi-step approach to select and characterize a panel of HLA-B7 9mer peptides as candidate immunogens. In sequence, we used algorithm-based predictions, in vivo immunization of HLA-B7 transgenic (Tg) mice, in vitro immunization of human blood lymphocytes from two normal donors and two cancer patients, in vivo processing in HLA-B7 Tg mice and HLA-B7 supertype binding. We found a correlation between the in vivo immunogenicity and the actual HLA-B7 binding avidity of the seven predicted peptides. Furthermore, endogenous processing correlated with in vitro immunogenicity in human PBMC and HLA-B7 supertype binding. Peptide (1123)LPSDFKTIL(1131) (p1123) with the wider spectrum of supertype binding displayed the highest immunogenicity overall and was endogenously processed in several human lymphoblastoid cells. Since no single step of the screening/selection process could substitute for the whole approach, we conclude that the identification of MHC class I-restricted peptides for potential vaccination of cancer patients remains, by and large, an empirical process.

Purpose To prospectively evaluate the pharmacokinetics and toxicity profile of paclitaxel in relation to patient age in adults ≥ 55 years old. Patients and Methods Paclitaxel was administered at 175 mg/m2 for 3 hours to 153 patients, 46 of whom were ≥ 75 years of age. Pharmacokinetic and toxicity assessments were performed. Data were analyzed by cohort (cohort 1, age 55 to 64 years; cohort 2, age 65 to 74 years; cohort 3, age ≥ 75 years). Results Paclitaxel concentration versus time (AUC) and total-body clearance (CLtb) data were available for 122 patients (cohort 1, 46 patients; cohort 2, 44 patients; cohort 3, 32 patients). Mean paclitaxel AUC increased across cohorts (P = .01). Mean (SE) AUCs were 22.4 (2.5) μmol/L × hour, 26.2 (2.8) μmol/L × hour, and 31.7 (5.6) μmol/L × hour for cohorts 1, 2, and 3, respectively. There was a corresponding significant (P = .007) age-related decrease in mean (SE) paclitaxel CLtb (cohort 1, 11.0 [0.7] L/h/m2; cohort 2, 9.3 [0.6] L/h/m2; cohort 3, 8.2 [0.6] L/h/m2). Patients in cohort 3 experienced significantly lower absolute neutrophil count nadirs than did younger groups (P = .02). There was also a significant increase in percentage of patients with ≥ grade 3 neutropenia across age cohorts (cohort 1, 22%; cohort 2, 35%; cohort 3, 49%; P = .006). However, the increased exposure of patients to paclitaxel and increased neutropenia were not reflected in adverse clinical sequelae such as hospitalization for toxicity (P = .82), receiving intravenous antibiotics (P = .21), or experiencing a temperature more than 38°C (P = .45). Conclusion Although paclitaxel CLtb decreases with increasing patient age, there is great interpatient variability. Cooperative group studies to evaluate the effect of aging on pharmacokinetics are feasible.

5047^ Background: Sipuleucel-T and AA + P are FDA-approved for asymptomatic/minimally symptomatic mCRPC. Suppression of the androgen axis can be immunostimulatory and AA suppresses circulating androgen levels; AA plus sipuleucel-T may therefore be synergistic. However P used with AA, which may be immunosuppressive, has not been studied with concurrent sipuleucelET and could impair sipuleucel-T production and/or immunologic response. P11-3 (NCT01487863) is the 1st study to evaluate the combination of sipuleucel-T and AA + P Methods: Patients (pts) with asymptomatic/minimally symptomatic mCRPC were randomized (1:1) to sipuleucel-T (3 infusions at approx 2-wk intervals) with up to 26 wks of AA + P (AA 1000mg QD + P 5mg BID) starting 1 day after the 1st sipuleucel-T infusion (concurrent, arm A) or at 10 wks following the 1st sipuleucel-T infusion (sequential, arm B). Endpoints included the effect of AA + P on product (sipuleucel-T) characteristics eg antigen presenting cell (APC) activation, measured as CD54 upregulation (primary endpoint), APC (measured as CD54+ cells) and total nucleated cell (TNC) counts, as well as safety and immunologic responses. Results: 31 pts in arm A and 32 pts in arm B completed sipuleucel-T treatment by the interim analysis (Nov 2012). Baseline characteristics were similar in the 2 arms. 60/63 pts received all 3 infusions of sipuleucel-T. No significant differences in median cumulative APC activation, APC count or TNC count were seen between the arms. Increased CD54 upregulation with the 2nd and 3rd treatments were indicative of a prime boost effect in both arms. Similar profiles of antigen-specific humoral and cellular immune responses were generated with no difference in magnitude of response between the arms (p>0.05). The incidence of adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs was similar in both arms. Conclusions: These data suggest sipuleucel-T can be successfully manufactured during concurrent AA + P. Product potency and prime boost effect were similar to sipuleucel-T alone. Immune responses and AEs were similar in both arms. It is not known if sipuleucel-T will provide similar efficacy with concurrent or sequential AA + P. Clinical trial information: NCT01487863.

255 Background: Increased signaling through mutational activation of fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) contributes to tumor development and vascularization of urothelial carcinoma (UC). Dovitinib (TKI258), an oral investigational inhibitor of angiogenic factors including FGFR3, has demonstrated inhibition of tumor growth and proliferation in preclinical UC models with FGFR3-activating mutations or protein overexpression. Methods: Advanced UC patients (pts) with 1-3 prior regimens received dovitinib 500 mg/day on a 5-days-on/2-days-off schedule. Pts were stratified into 2 groups based on presence (mut) or absence (non-mut) of FGFR3 gene mutation in archival tissue (initially analyzed by SNaPshot; later by Sanger sequencing for screening and confirmation). The primary objective was overall response rate (ORR) in each group using a Simon’s 2-stage design (20 pts planned for stage 1 and 20 for stage 2 if ≥ 2 responses seen in stage 1). Results: A total of 44 pts (median age, 67 years) were treated in stage 1: 12 FGFR3 mut, 31 FGFR3 non-mut, and 1 unknown mutation status. Over-recruitment of non-mut pts was due to rapid enrollment of non-mut pts with invasive bladder tumors and some tumors initially classified as mut by SNaPshot but reclassified as non-mut after sequencing. Most pts (77%) had metastases in ≥ 2 organs. ORR (local review) was 0% in the FGFR3 mut group and 3% in the FGFR3 non-mut group (1 partial response). Median progression-free survival was 3 months in the FGFR3 mut group and 1.8 months in the FGFR3 non-mut group. There were insufficient non-mut responders to proceed to stage 2. Since most pts in the mut group did not receive > 6 months of treatment and meeting the response threshold to proceed to stage 2 was highly unlikely, the study was terminated. Common adverse events were diarrhea (73%), nausea (61%), and asthenia (50%) and were similar in both groups. Conclusions: Although there were difficulties in evaluating mutation status, dovitinib had limited single-agent activity in pts with advanced bladder cancer regardless of FGFR3 mutation status. Further studies are needed to understand the role of FGFR3 inhibition in advanced UC treatment. Clinical trial information: NCT00790426.

257 Background: Cabazitaxel (Cbz) improves overall survival in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) after docetaxel failure, compared with mitoxantrone (HR 0.70; 95% CI 0.59–0.83; P < 0.0001). Following Cbz approval for the treatment of mCRPC, this study was undertaken to evaluate any effect of Cbz on the QTc interval. Methods: This prospective, multinational, open-label study ( NCT01087021 ) enrolled pts with advanced solid tumors (without other therapeutic options). Cbz 25 mg/m² IV was administered on Day 1 Q3W. QTc and other ECG intervals were assessed on Day 1 of Cycle 1. Triplicate ECGs were obtained from 12-lead Holter recordings and concomitant serial blood samples were collected for pharmacokinetic (PK) analysis. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in the corrected QTc interval (according to the Fridericia formula QTcF). Results: A total of 96 pts were enrolled; 32 pts under the original protocol (6-h Holter) and 64 pts following protocol amendment 1, which extended ECG and PK monitoring (24-h Holter). Median age was 63 yrs (69.8% male), 30.5% and 57.9% of pts were ECOG PS 0 and 1 respectively; 33 pts (34.4%) had prostate cancer. Screening ECG was abnormal but not clinically significant in 39.6% of pts. The majority (n = 65) of pts received ≥ 3 treatment cycles; safety and ECG parameters were evaluated in 95 and 94 pts, respectively. In the 24-h Holter group (n = 63), the maximum least squares (LS) mean change from baseline in QTcF was 4.8 msec (90% CI 2.1–7.5), returning to baseline by 24 h. Similar results were observed in the overall population (n = 94). At Cmax, Cbz concentration had no effect on QTcF change from baseline; the mean (CV%) Cmax (n = 91) and AUC (n = 92) were 276 ng/ml (63%) and 1245 ng.h/ml (82%). The LS mean change from baseline in heart rate increased up to 24 h but remained < 10 beats per minute. The most common Grade 3/4 AEs were neutropenia (27.4%), febrile neutropenia (12.6%), fatigue (12.6%) and dehydration (5.3%). No Grade 3/4 cardiac AEs were reported. Of the 6 deaths reported, 1 (infection) was study drug related. Conclusions: Cbz had no significant effect on QTc interval in pts with advanced tumors. The Cbz safety profile is consistent with previous findings and with other taxane-based therapies.