Search

Background and Objective: Whether benefits and risks of intravenous (IV) infliximab combotherapy with immunosuppressants versus infliximab monotherapy apply to subcutaneous (SC) infliximab is unknown. This post hoc analysis of a pivotal randomised CT-P13 SC 1.6 trial aimed to compare SC infliximab monotherapy with combotherapy in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Methods: Biologic-naïve patients with active Crohn’s disease or ulcerative colitis received CT-P13 IV 5 mg/kg at Week (W) 0 and 2 (dose-loading phase). At W6, patients were randomised (1:1) to receive CT-P13 SC 120 or 240 mg (patients 0.999) or meeting efficacy or biomarker outcomes including clinical remission (62.9% vs 74.1%; p = 0.418). Monotherapy and combotherapy groups had comparable immunogenicity (anti-drug antibodies [ADAs]: 65.5% vs 48.0% [p = 0.271], neutralising antibodies [in ADA-positive patients]: 10.5% vs 16.7% [p = 0.630], respectively). Conclusions: Pharmacokinetics, efficacy and immunogenicity were potentially comparable between SC infliximab monotherapy and combotherapy in biologic-naïve IBD patients. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02883452. Graphical Abstract: [Figure not available: see fulltext.]

Background Crohn’s disease (CD) is highly heterogenous and may be complicated by stricturing behavior. Personalized prediction of stricturing will inform management. We aimed to create a stricturing risk stratification model using genomic/clinical data. Methods Exome sequencing was performed on CD patients, and phenotype data retrieved. Biallelic variants in NOD2 were identified. NOD2 was converted into a per-patient deleteriousness metric (“GenePy”). Using training data, patients were stratified into risk groups for fibrotic stricturing using NOD2. Findings were validated in a testing data set. Models were modified to include disease location at diagnosis. Cox proportional hazards assessed performance. Results Six hundred forty-five patients were included (373 children and 272 adults); 48 patients fulfilled criteria for monogenic NOD2-related disease (7.4%), 24 of whom had strictures. NOD2 GenePy scores stratified patients in training data into 2 risk groups. Within testing data, 30 of 161 patients (18.6%) were classified as high-risk based on the NOD2 biomarker, with stricturing in 17 of 30 (56.7%). In the low-risk group, 28 of 131 (21.4%) had stricturing behavior. Cox proportional hazards using the NOD2 risk groups demonstrated a hazard ratio (HR) of 2.092 (P = 2.4 × 10-5), between risk groups. Limiting analysis to patients diagnosed aged Conclusions A NOD2 genomic biomarker predicts stricturing risk, with prognostic power improved in pediatric-onset CD. Implementation into a clinical setting can help personalize management.

IntroductionPatients with suspected inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) referred from primary care often face diagnostic and treatment delays. This study aimed to compare a novel direct-access IBD endoscopy pathway with the traditional care model.MethodSingle centre real-world study analysing primary care referrals with suspected IBD. Group A: patients triaged to direct-access IBD endoscopy. Group B: patients undergoing traditional outpatient appointments before the availability of direct-access IBD endoscopy. Demographics, fecal calprotectin (FCP), C-reactive protein (CRP), disease activity score, endoscopy findings, treatment and follow-up were collected and statistically analysed. Ranked semantic analysis of IBD symptoms contained within referral letters was performed.ResultsReferral letters did not differ significantly in Groups A and B. Demographic data, FCP and CRP values were similar. Referral to treatment time (RTT) at the time of IBD endoscopy was reduced from 177 days (Group B) to 24 days (Group A) (pConclusionOur novel pathway resulted in an 86% reduction in RTT with associated increased diagnostic yield while saving 100% of initial IBD consultant outpatient appointments. Replication in other trusts may improve patient experience and accelerate time to diagnosis/treatment while optimising the use of healthcare resources.

Item does not contain fulltext BACKGROUND: Etrolizumab is a gut-targeted anti-β7 integrin monoclonal antibody. In a previous phase 2 induction study, etrolizumab significantly improved clinical remission versus placebo in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis. We aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of etrolizumab with infliximab in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis. METHODS: We conducted a randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, phase 3 study (GARDENIA) across 114 treatment centres worldwide. We included adults (age 18-80 years) with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (Mayo Clinic total score [MCS] of 6-12 with an endoscopic subscore of ≥2, a rectal bleeding subscore of ≥1, and a stool frequency subscore of ≥1) who were naive to tumour necrosis factor inhibitors. Patients were required to have had an established diagnosis of ulcerative colitis for at least 3 months, corroborated by both clinical and endoscopic evidence, and evidence of disease extending at least 20 cm from the anal verge. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive subcutaneous etrolizumab 105 mg once every 4 weeks or intravenous infliximab 5 mg/kg at 0, 2, and 6 weeks and every 8 weeks thereafter for 52 weeks. Randomisation was stratified by baseline concomitant treatment with corticosteroids, concomitant treatment with immunosuppressants, and baseline disease activity. All participants and study site personnel were masked to treatment assignment. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients who had both clinical response at week 10 (MCS ≥3-point decrease and ≥30% reduction from baseline, plus ≥1-point decrease in rectal bleeding subscore or absolute rectal bleeding score of 0 or 1) and clinical remission at week 54 (MCS ≤2, with individual subscores ≤1); efficacy was analysed using a modified intention-to-treat population (all randomised patients who received at least one dose of study drug). GARDENIA was designed to show superiority of etrolizumab over infliximab for the primary endpoint. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02136069, and is now closed to recruitment. FINDINGS: Between Dec 24, 2014, and June 23, 2020, 730 patients were screened for eligibility and 397 were enrolled and randomly assigned to etrolizumab (n=199) or infliximab (n=198). 95 (48%) patients in the etrolizumab group and 103 (52%) in the infliximab group completed the study through week 54. At week 54, 37 (18·6%) of 199 patients in the etrolizumab group and 39 (19·7%) of 198 in the infliximab group met the primary endpoint (adjusted treatment difference -0·9% [95% CI -8·7 to 6·8]; p=0·81). The number of patients reporting one or more adverse events was similar between treatment groups (154 [77%] of 199 in the etrolizumab group and 151 [76%] of 198 in the infliximab group); the most common adverse event in both groups was ulcerative colitis (55 [28%] patients in the etrolizumab group and 43 [22%] in the infliximab group). More patients in the etrolizumab group reported serious adverse events (including serious infections) than did those in the infliximab group (32 [16%] vs 20 [10%]); the most common serious adverse event was ulcerative colitis (12 [6%] and 11 [6%]). There was one death during follow-up, in the infliximab group due to a pulmonary embolism, which was not considered to be related to study treatment. INTERPRETATION: To our knowledge, this trial is the first phase 3 maintenance study in moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis to use infliximab as an active comparator. Although the study did not show statistical superiority for the primary endpoint, etrolizumab performed similarly to infliximab from a clinical viewpoint. FUNDING: F Hoffmann-La Roche.

Contains fulltext : 291657.pdf (Publisher’s version ) (Open Access) BACKGROUND: Anti-TNF drugs, such as infliximab, are associated with attenuated antibody responses after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. We aimed to determine how the anti-TNF drug infliximab and the anti-integrin drug vedolizumab affect vaccine-induced neutralising antibodies against highly transmissible omicron (B.1.1.529) BA.1, and BA.4 and BA.5 (hereafter BA.4/5) SARS-CoV-2 variants, which possess the ability to evade host immunity and, together with emerging sublineages, are now the dominating variants causing current waves of infection. METHODS: CLARITY IBD is a prospective, multicentre, observational cohort study investigating the effect of infliximab and vedolizumab on SARS-CoV-2 infection and vaccination in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Patients aged 5 years and older with a diagnosis of IBD and being treated with infliximab or vedolizumab for 6 weeks or longer were recruited from infusion units at 92 hospitals in the UK. In this analysis, we included participants who had received uninterrupted biological therapy since recruitment and without a previous SARS-CoV-2 infection. The primary outcome was neutralising antibody responses against SARS-CoV-2 wild-type and omicron subvariants BA.1 and BA.4/5 after three doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. We constructed Cox proportional hazards models to investigate the risk of breakthrough infection in relation to neutralising antibody titres. The study is registered with the ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN45176516, and is closed to accrual. FINDINGS: Between Sept 22 and Dec 23, 2020, 7224 patients with IBD were recruited to the CLARITY IBD study, of whom 1288 had no previous SARS-CoV-2 infection after three doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine and were established on either infliximab (n=871) or vedolizumab (n=417) and included in this study (median age was 46·1 years [IQR 33·6-58·2], 610 [47·4%] were female, 671 [52·1%] were male, 1209 [93·9%] were White, and 46 [3·6%] were Asian). After three doses of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, 50% neutralising titres (NT50s) were significantly lower in patients treated with infliximab than in those treated with vedolizumab, against wild-type (geometric mean 2062 [95% CI 1720-2473] vs 3440 [2939-4026]; p

Background: The combination of infliximab and immunosuppressant therapy is a standard management strategy for patients with Crohn's disease. Concerns regarding the implications of long-term combination therapy provided the rationale for a formal clinical trial of treatment de-escalation. Our aim was to compare the relapse rate and the time spent in remission over 2 years between patients continuing combination therapy and those stopping infliximab or immunosuppressant therapy. Methods: This multicentre, open-label, randomised controlled trial was performed in 64 hospitals in seven countries in Europe and Australia. Adult patients with Crohn's disease in steroid-free clinical remission for more than 6 months, on combination therapy of infliximab and immunosuppressant therapy for at least 8 months were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to either continue combination therapy (combination group), discontinue infliximab (infliximab withdrawal group), or discontinue immunosuppressant therapy (immunosuppressant withdrawal group). Randomisation was stratified according to disease duration before start of first anti-TNF treatment (≤2 or >2 years), failure of immunosuppressant therapy before start of infliximab, and presence of ulcers at baseline endoscopy. The patient number and group of each stratum were assigned by a central online randomisation website. Treatment was optimised or resumed in case of relapse in all groups. Participants, those assessing outcomes, and those analysing the data were not masked to group assignment. The coprimary endpoints were the relapse rate (superiority analysis) and time in remission over 2 years (non-inferiority analysis, non-inferiority margin 35 days). Analyses were done on an intention-to-treat basis. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02177071, and with EU Clinical Trials Register, EUDRACT 2014-002311-41. The trial was completed in April, 2021. Findings: Between Nov 2, 2015, and April 24, 2019, 254 patients were screened. Of these, 211 were randomised and 207 were included in the final analysis (n=67 in the combination group, n=71 in the infliximab withdrawal group, and n=69 in the immunosuppressant withdrawal group). 39 patients had a relapse (eight [12%] of 67 in the combination group, 25 [35%] of 71 in the infliximab withdrawal group, six [9%] of 69 in the immunosuppressant withdrawal group). 2-year relapse rates were 14% (95% CI 4–23) in the combination group, 36% (24–47) in the infliximab withdrawal group, and 10% (2–18) in the immunosuppressant withdrawal group (hazard ratio [HR] 3·45 [95% CI 1·56–7·69], p=0·003, for infliximab withdrawal vs combination, and 4·76 [1·92–11·11], p=0·0004, for infliximab withdrawal vs immunosuppressant withdrawal). Of 28 patients who had a relapse and were retreated or optimised according to protocol, remission was achieved in 25 patients (one of two in the combination group, 22 of 23 in the infliximab withdrawal group, and two of three in the immunosuppressant withdrawal group). The mean time spent in remission over 2 years was 698 days (95% CI 668–727) in the combination group, 684 days (651–717) in the infliximab withdrawal group, and 706 days (682–730) in the immunosuppressant withdrawal group. The difference in restricted mean survival time in remission was –14 days (95% CI –56 to 27) between the infliximab withdrawal group and the combination group and –22 days (–62 to 16) between the infliximab withdrawal group and the immunosuppressant withdrawal group. The 95% CIs contained the non-inferiority threshold (–35 days). We recorded 31 serious adverse events, in 20 patients, with no difference in frequency between groups. The most frequent serious adverse events were infections (four in the combination group, two in the infliximab withdrawal group, and one in the immunosuppressant withdrawal group) and Crohn's disease exacerbation (three in the combination group, four in the infliximab withdrawal group, and one in the immunosuppressant withdrawal group). No death nor malignancy was recorded. Interpretation: In patients with Crohn's disease in sustained steroid-free remission under combination therapy with infliximab and immunosuppressant therapy, withdrawal of infliximab should only be considered after careful assessment of risks and benefits for each patient, whereas withdrawal of immunosuppressant therapy could generally represent a preferable strategy when considering treatment de-escalation. Funding: European Union's Horizon 2020.

Introduction/Background Enteropathic arthritis is inflammatory arthritis which is associated with inflammatory bowel disease such as Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis. The optimal treatment for patients is one which is effective for both arthritis and bowel disease. First line treatments include DMARDs such as methotrexate and sulfasalazine. Second line options include anti-TNF biologics such as infliximab and adalimumab, and the anti-IL-12/23 biologic ustekinumab. There is currently little guidance on choice of treatment if these options fail. We present a case of Crohn’s-associated inflammatory arthritis which did not respond to two anti-TNFs but was successfully treated with the JAK inhibitor upadacinitib. Description/Method A 30-year-old male was referred to gastroenterology with a 4 month history of diarrhoea and weight loss. His faecal calprotectin was raised at 982µg/g. He had a history of seronegative inflammatory arthritis diagnosed 5 years previously. He had been treated initially with methotrexate and sulfasalazine, which were discontinued due to side effects and inefficacy, and his arthritis was subsequently well-controlled on etanercept for the last year. Colonoscopy showed patchy colitis at the rectum which was continuous in the transverse and ascending colon and caecum. The appearances and mucosal biopsy were consistent with moderately active Crohn’s colitis. In view of this, etanercept was switched to adalimumab, which was administered using the accelerated loading regimen used in IBD. Five weeks after switching the patient developed a flare of arthritis with knee and ankle inflammation and CRP 30. He was given oral steroids and reviewed in a combined rheumatology/gastroenterology clinic. The frequency of adalimumab was increased to 40mg weekly and subcutaneous methotrexate 10mg weekly was introduced. Despite this, the patient’s arthritis remained active, although with some improvement in his bowel symptoms and a fall in faecal calprotectin to 117µg/g. Adalimumab was switched to certolizumab and methotrexate increased to 15mg weekly with intra-muscular steroids. On certolizumab he developed progressively more active arthritis with CRP 83, bilateral ankle inflammation and large knee effusions requiring aspiration and steroid injection. After 8 weeks of certolizumab, there was no improvement and the decision was made to switch to upadacitinib 15mg daily. Within 4 weeks of treatment with upadacitinib he noticed a significant improvement in his arthritis and after 12 weeks was in clinical remission with normal CRP and faecal calprotectin. Methotrexate was later discontinued due to nausea. Over 12 months later the patient remains in remission for both bowel disease and arthritis on upadacitinib monotherapy. Discussion/Results In enteropathic arthritis, joint symptoms may precede or follow bowel disease. Etanercept, a recombinant TNF-receptor fusion protein, is not an effective treatment for IBD. Indeed, there are case reports and observational data to suggest that etanercept may be associated with an increased risk of developing IBD in some patients. In our case the patient developed Crohn’s disease while taking etanercept and the switch to adalimumab precipitated a flare of his arthritis which was not controlled by treatment intensification. The failure of two anti-TNF biologics, adalimumab and certolizumab, may point to the activation of alternative cytokine inflammatory pathways as the driver of the patient’s disease. Our patient was managed in a combined rheumatology/gastroenterology clinic which enabled an inter-specialty approach to managing both aspects of his disease. After the failure of certolizumub we made the decision to trial upadacitinib, a selective JAK1 inhibitor, owing to our experience of its effectiveness in rheumatoid and psoriatic arthritis, and its promising results in Phase 3 trials in Crohn’s disease. We considered ustekinumab but opted against it as in our experience it may be suboptimal in patients in whom arthritis is the most troublesome symptom. Upadacitinib worked quickly and effectively to control our patient’s arthritis alongside his bowel disease and was well tolerated. There are currently limited treatments which are effective for both IBD and arthritis, and there is little guidance on treatment strategies in enteropathic arthritis if anti-TNF and ustekinumab are unsuccessful. Tofacitinib, a JAK1/3 inhibitor, is licensed for rheumatoid and psoriatic arthritis and ulcerative colitis, but is not effective for Crohn’s disease. Upadacitinib is undergoing Phase 3 trials in Crohn’s disease and our case highlights its potential role in the treatment of patients with Crohn’s disease and inflammatory arthritis in whom anti-TNF therapy is unsuccessful. Key learning points/Conclusion 1. Etanercept is not an effective treatment for inflammatory bowel disease and may necessitate a change to another anti-TNF biologic such as infliximab or adalimumab. 2. Upadacitinib, a selective JAK1 inhibitor, was successfully used in our case to treat both arthritis and bowel disease. Although this was just one case, the results of Phase 3 trials suggest a promising role for upadacitinib in Crohn’s disease and it is already used in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis. 3. Patients with enteropathic arthritis may be best managed in a specialist combined gastroenterology and rheumatology clinic where a holistic approach to the management of both aspects of their disease can be undertaken.

BACKGROUND Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) may impact the extent to which food, eating, and drinking bring satisfaction and enjoyment to peoples' lives, and this may impact dietary intake. The prevalence of an impaired food-related quality of life (FR-QoL), its associated factors, and its impact on diet have not been explored. OBJECTIVES To measure the prevalence and nature of the burden of impaired FR-QoL in people with IBD, the factors associated with these, and their associations with nutrient intake. METHODS We recruited 1576 outpatients with IBD (≥16 years old) in person from 7 IBD centers across the United Kingdom. Patients completed validated questionnaires to measure their FR-QoL, quality of life (QoL), distress, fatigue, anxiety, and depression. Dietary intake was recorded using the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer FFQ. A health professional recorded disease activity, Montreal classification, blood results, BMI, and malnutrition risk. FR-QoL was regressed onto explanatory variables using univariable and multivariable analyses. RESULTS Data from 1221 patients were available (77.4% response; Crohn's disease, 65%; ulcerative colitis, 35%). The FR-QoL mean (± SD) score was 80.8 ± 26.9, with wide ranges (minimum, 29; maximum, 145). Following multivariable regression, the strongest associations with FR-QoL were the number of recent disease flares (5 flares β = -12.7; P

Background Intestinal macrophages are key immune cells in the maintenance of intestinal immune homeostasis and have a role in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, the mechanisms by which macrophages exert a pathological influence in both ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn disease (CD) are not yet well understood. Methods We purified intestinal macrophages from gastrointestinal mucosal biopsies (patients with UC, patients with CD, and healthy donors) and analyzed their transcriptome by RNA sequencing and bioinformatics, confirming results with quantitative polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemistry. Results Compared with those of healthy donors, intestinal macrophages in patients with UC and with CD showed cellular reprograming of 1287 and 840 dysregulated genes, respectively (false discovery rate ≤ 0.1). The UC and CD intestinal macrophages showed an activated M1 inflammatory phenotype and the downregulation of genes engaged in drug/xenobiotic metabolism. Only macrophages from CD showed, concomitant to an M1 phenotype, a significant enrichment in the expression of M2 and fibrotic and granuloma-related genes. For the first time, we showed (and validated by quantitative polymerase chain reaction and immunohistochemistry) that intestinal macrophages in patients with IBD present both M1 and M2 features, as recently described for tumor-associated macrophages, that affect key pathways for IBD pathology, represented by key markers such as MMP12 (fibrosis), CXCL9 (T-cell attraction), and CD40 (T-cell activation). Conclusions Our data support the therapeutic targeting of macrophages to maintain remission in IBD but also indicate that a shift toward an M2 program—as proposed by some reports—may not limit the recruitment and activation of T cells because M2 features do not preclude M1 activation in patients with UC or CD and could exacerbate M2-related CD-specific features such as fibrosis and the formation of granulomas.

Objectives: Transition from originator biological medicines to their biosimilar equivalents is now part of routine clinical practice, but there is little understanding of patient experiences, which influence adherence and overall satisfaction with care. Understanding this will help ensure future switches adequately address patients' concerns and expectations leading to better outcomes for all stakeholders. Method: 35 patients participating in a clinical trial including an open-label transition event from originator to biosimilar adalimumab, mimicking what would be encountered in a real-world setting, took part in semi-structured interviews exploring their experience of biosimilar transition. Results: Opinions expressed were often heterogeneous, but common experiences and themes were identified. Five themes were identified following thematic analysis. (1) Understanding and awareness of biosimilars: prior awareness of biosimilars and knowledge of the biosimilar concept was low, indicating a disparity between healthcare professionals and patients. (2) Motivation to undertake transition: patients accept a biosimilar transition to minimise drug expenditure. (3) Initial concerns: before undertaking biosimilar transition away from the brand they had experienced, anticipated loss of efficacy and adverse effects from the biosimilar were common concerns for patients. (4) Reassuring factors: trust in the healthcare team is critical to patient acceptance of biosimilars. Important reassurances include a point of contact, education about biosimilars and monitoring. (5) Experiences during the transition: on reflection, participants described consistent efficacy and tolerability (although 22 participants specifically mentioned injection pain) following brand transition. Conclusion: The majority of patients felt comfortable with future transition to another adalimumab biosimilar. Injection experience was an important component of patient satisfaction.

Background: A treat-to-target strategy, in which strictly defined treatment targets facilitate decision making in clinical practice, is advocated as an optimised management approach for some chronic disorders. The aim of the STARDUST trial was to assess whether a treat-to-target strategy with early endoscopy, regular biomarker and clinical symptom monitoring, and dose intensification for persistent inflammatory activity, was more successful in achieving endoscopic improvement at week 48 than a clinically driven maintenance strategy in patients with moderate-to-severe active Crohn's disease receiving ustekinumab. Methods: This open-label, multicentre, randomised phase 3b trial included adults with active, moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease (Crohn's Disease Activity Index [CDAI] 220–450 and Simple Endoscopic Score in Crohn's Disease [SES-CD] ≥3) for whom conventional therapy or one biologic therapy, or both, had failed. Patients received intravenous ustekinumab approximating 6 mg/kg at baseline and subcutaneous ustekinumab 90 mg at week 8. At week 16, patients with a CDAI improvement of 70 or more points from baseline were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive standard-of-care or treat-to-target maintenance treatment through week 48. Randomisation was balanced by using randomly permuted blocks and was stratified by biologic history status and baseline SES-CD score. All patients who signed informed consent, who were not screening failures, and who received at least one dose of study treatment were included in week 16 analyses. All patients included in week 16 analyses and randomly assigned to one of the maintenance treatment regimens were included in the week 48 efficacy and safety analyses (ie, on an intention-to-treat basis). Patients assigned to the treat-to-target arm received ustekinumab every 12 weeks or every 8 weeks based on SES-CD improvement from baseline and could escalate to every 4 weeks through week 48 if prespecified targets were missed. Patients assigned to the standard-of-care arm received ustekinumab every 12 weeks or every 8 weeks; those receiving treatment every 12 weeks could escalate per European labelling. The primary efficacy endpoint was endoscopic response at week 48 (SES-CD score ≥50% decrease from baseline), analysed by non-responder imputation. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03107793, and is active but not recruiting. Findings: 498 patients received standard induction treatment, of whom 440 were randomly assigned to the treat-to-target group (n=219) or the standard-of-care group (n=221). At week 48, there was no significant difference in endoscopic response (83 [38%] of 219 patients vs 66 [30%] of 221 patients; p=0·087), endoscopic remission (25 [11%] vs 32 [15%]; p=0·334), mucosal healing (31 [14%] vs 37 [17%]; p=0·449), and clinical remission (135 [62%] vs 154 [70%]; p=0·072) between the two groups; clinical response was significantly lower in the treat-to-target group than in the standard-of-care group (149 [68%] vs 172 [78%]; p=0·020). Other endoscopic, clinical, and biomarker outcomes were generally not significantly different between groups. The most commonly reported treatment-emergent adverse events were nasopharyngitis (29 [13%] of 219 patients in the treat-to-target group vs 29 [13%] of 221 patients in the standard-of-care group), abdominal pain (23 [11%] vs 19 [9%]), arthralgia (24 [11%] vs 19 [9%]), and headache (24 [11%] vs 21 [10%]). Interpretation: Timely escalation of ustekinumab therapy for patients with Crohn's disease, based on early endoscopic response, clinical symptoms, and biomarkers, did not result in significantly better endoscopic outcomes at week 48 than symptom-driven decisions alone. Future studies need to confirm if some subgroups of patient might benefit from a treat-to-target strategy with ustekinumab. Funding: Janssen-Cilag.

Anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) agents such as infliximab and adalimumab have greatly altered the treatment landscape in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, there are remaining unmet needs and opportunities to optimise their use. Recent data suggest that proactive therapeutic drug monitoring may lead to more efficient usage of these agents, with potential for higher rates of corticosteroid-free clinical remission than with reactive monitoring. Expanded application of faecal calprotectin measurements may also be valuable, given the ease of use of the assay and its proven effectiveness as a diagnostic tool and predictor of relapse risk. From a practical viewpoint, improved multidisciplinary working may be essential to optimise patient care, with IBD nurse specialists playing an increasingly central role within this model. Finally, the availability of biosimilars of the anti-TNF agents allow drug costs to be reduced without compromising safety or efficacy – thereby providing opportunities to improve accessibility. Alongside extensive data on originator to biosimilar infliximab switch, new studies are beginning to demonstrate the safety of biosimilar to biosimilar switch, as well as adalimumab biosimilar transitions. The risk of a nocebo effect when switching to a biosimilar can be reduced through improved patient education and preparation.

Background Primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) is closely associated with inflammatory bowel disease, particularly ulcerative colitis (UC), with an increased risk of biliary and colorectal malignancy. We sought to clarify the prevalence, characteristics and long-term outcome of sub-clinical PSC diagnosed by magnetic resonance cholangiogram (MRC) in patients with UC and normal liver biochemistry, with or without colorectal dysplasia (CRD). Methods In this prospective case-control study, 70 patients with UC and normal liver function (51 extensive UC, 19 CRD), 28 healthy volunteers (negative controls) and 28 patients with PSC and cholestasis (positive controls) underwent MRC and blood evaluation. MRC scans were interpreted blindly by two radiologists who graded individually, the scans as definitive for PSC, possible for PSC or normal. Clinical outcome was assessed by blood monitoring, abdominal imaging and endoscopic surveillance. Results 7/51 (14%) with extensive UC and 4/19 (21%) with CRD had biliary abnormalities on MRC consistent with PSC. 7/11 (64%) with sub-clinical PSC had isolated intrahepatic duct involvement. Sub-clinical PSC was associated with advanced age (P = .04), non-smoking (P = .03), pANCA (P = .04), quiescent colitis (P = .02), absence of azathioprine (P = .04) and high-grade CRD (P = .03). Inter-observer (kappa = 0.88) and intra-observer (kappa = 0.96) agreement for MRC interpretation was high. No negative controls were assessed as definite PSC, 4/28 were considered on blinding as possible PSC. During follow-up of sub-clinical PSC (median 10.1(3.1-11.9) years), four patients developed abnormal liver biochemistry, two had radiological progression of PSC and seven developed malignancy, including two biliary and one colorectal carcinoma. Conclusions Prevalence of sub-clinical PSC appears high in patients with extensive UC and normal liver biochemistry, with or without CRD. Disease progression and malignancy were identified on long-term follow-up. MRC should be considered for all patients with extensive UC or CRD to stratify surveillance.

Background Anti-TNF exposure has been linked to demyelination events. We sought to describe the clinical features of demyelination events following anti-TNF treatment and to test whether affected patients were genetically predisposed to multiple sclerosis [MS]. Methods We conducted a case-control study to describe the clinical features of demyelination events following anti-TNF exposure. We compared genetic risk scores [GRS], calculated using carriage of 43 susceptibility loci for MS, in 48 cases with 1219 patients exposed to anti-TNF who did not develop demyelination. Results Overall, 39 [74%] cases were female. The median age [range] of patients at time of demyelination was 41.5 years [20.7–63.2]. The median duration of anti-TNF treatment was 21.3 months [0.5-99.4] and 19 [36%] patients were receiving concomitant immunomodulators. Most patients had central demyelination affecting the brain, spinal cord, or both. Complete recovery was reported in 12 [23%] patients after a median time of 6.8 months [0.1–28.7]. After 33.0 months of follow-up, partial recovery was observed in 29 [55%] patients, relapsing and remitting episodes in nine [17%], progressive symptoms in three [6%]: two [4%] patients were diagnosed with MS. There was no significant difference between MS GRS scores in cases (mean -3.5 × 10–4, standard deviation [SD] 0.0039) and controls [mean -1.1 × 10–3, SD 0.0042] [p = 0.23]. Conclusions Patients who experienced demyelination events following anti-TNF exposure were more likely female, less frequently treated with an immunomodulator, and had a similar genetic risk to anti-TNF exposed controls who did not experience demyelination events. Large prospective studies with pre-treatment neuroimaging are required to identify genetic susceptibility loci.

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) clinical nurse specialists deliver a service that is highly valued by patients. Access to a specialist nurse-led IBD helpline forms part of the UK IBD consensus standards. This retrospective cohort study analyses the workload evolution of an IBD helpline and discusses its implications for the design of future services. Helpline activity was shown to increase significantly between 2016 and 2018. While largely due to appropriate increased patient demand for acute advice, significant inefficiencies were demonstrated. These are likely to be present in other comparable helpline services, alongside opportunities for making more efficient use of specialist nurse time. In addition, helpline activity was shown to generate a significant additional workload involving patient follow-up and results. Robust methods for capturing this workload could help units with similar services with service design, job planning and reimbursement.

Summary Background Etrolizumab is a gut-targeted, anti-β7 integrin, monoclonal antibody. In an earlier phase 2 induction study, etrolizumab significantly improved clinical remission compared with placebo in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of etrolizumab in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis who had been previously treated with anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) agents. Methods HICKORY was a multicentre, phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in adult (18–80 years) patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis (Mayo Clinic total score [MCS] of 6–12 with an endoscopic subscore of ≥2, a rectal bleeding subscore of ≥1, and a stool frequency subscore of ≥1) previously treated with TNF inhibitors. Patients were recruited from 184 treatment centres across 24 countries in North America, South America, Europe, Asia, Oceania, and the Middle East. Patients needed to have an established diagnosis of ulcerative colitis for at least 3 months, corroborated by both clinical and endoscopic evidence, and evidence of disease extending at least 20 cm from the anal verge. In cohort 1, patients received open-label etrolizumab 105 mg every 4 weeks for a 14-week induction period. In cohort 2, patients were randomly assigned (4:1) to receive subcutaneous etrolizumab 105 mg or placebo every 4 weeks for the 14-week induction phase. Patients in either cohort achieving clinical response to etrolizumab induction were eligible for the maintenance phase, in which they were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive subcutaneous etrolizumab 105 mg or placebo every 4 weeks through to week 66. Randomisation was stratified by baseline concomitant treatment with corticosteroids, concomitant treatment with immunosuppressants (induction randomisation only), baseline disease activity, week 14 MCS remission status (maintenance randomisation only), and induction cohort (maintenance randomisation only). All patients and study site personnel were masked to treatment assignment. Primary endpoints were remission (Mayo Clinic total score [MCS] ≤2, with individual subscores of ≤1 and a rectal bleeding subscore of 0) at week 14, and remission at week 66 among patients with a clinical response (MCS with ≥3-point decrease and ≥30% reduction from baseline, plus ≥1 point decrease in rectal bleeding subscore or absolute rectal bleeding score of 0 or 1) at week 14. Efficacy was analysed using a modified intent-to-treat population. Safety analyses included all patients who received at least one dose of study drug during the induction phase. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov , NCT02100696 . Findings HICKORY was conducted from May 21, 2014, to April 16, 2020, during which time 1081 patients were screened, and 609 deemed eligible for inclusion. 130 patients were included in cohort 1. In cohort 2,479 patients were randomly assigned to the induction phase (etrolizumab n=384, placebo n=95). 232 patients were randomly assigned to the maintenance phase (etrolizumab to etrolizumab n=117, etrolizumab to placebo n=115). At week 14, 71 (18·5%) of 384 patients in the etrolizumab group and six (6·3%) of 95 patients in the placebo group achieved the primary induction endpoint of remission (p=0·0033). No significant difference between etrolizumab and placebo was observed for the primary maintenance endpoint of remission at week 66 among patients with a clinical response at week 14 (27 [24·1%] of 112 vs 23 [20·2%] of 114; p=0·50). Four patients in the etrolizumab group reported treatment-related adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation. The proportion of patients reporting at least adverse event was similar between treatment groups for induction (etrolizumab 253 [66%] of 384; placebo 63 [66%] of 95) and maintenance (etrolizumab to etrolizumab 98 [88%] of 112; etrolizumab to placebo 97 [85%] of 114). The most common adverse event in both groups was ulcerative colitis flare. Most adverse events were mild or moderate. During induction, the most common serious adverse event was ulcerative colitis flare (etrolizumab ten [3%] of 384; placebo: two [2%] of 95). During maintenance, the most common serious adverse event in the etrolizumab to etrolizumab group was appendicitis (two [2%] of 112) and the most common serious adverse events in the etrolizumab to placebo group were ulcerative colitis flare (two [2%] of 114) and anaemia (two [2%] of 114). Interpretation HICKORY demonstrated that a significantly higher proportion of patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis who had been previously treated with anti-TNF agent were able to achieve remission at week 14 when treated with etrolizumab compared with placebo; however, there was no significant difference between groups in remission at week 66 among patients with a clinical response at week 14. Funding F Hoffmann-La Roche.

Background and Aims Subcutaneous [SC] vedolizumab presents the opportunity for inflammatory bowel disease [IBD] patients to manage their treatment at home. There are currently no data on the process of transitioning patients established on intravenous [IV] to SC vedolizumab as part of routine clinical care. The aim of this programme is to evaluate the clinical and biochemical outcomes of switching a cohort of IBD patients established on IV vedolizumab to SC, at 12 weeks following the transition. Methods In all, 178 adult patients were offered the opportunity to transition to SC vedolizumab. Patients who agreed were reviewed prior to switching and at Week 12 [W12] after their first SC dose. Evaluation outcomes included disease activity scores, the IBD-Control Patient-Reported Outcome Measures [PROMs], and faecal calprotectin [FCP]. Reasons for patients declining or accepting transitioning, pharmacokinetics, adverse drug reactions, and risk factors for a poor outcome in SARS-CoV-2 infection were also assessed. Results A total of 124 patients agreed to transition, of whom 106 patients had been on IV vedolizumab for at least 4 months. There were no statistically significant differences in disease activity scores or IBD-Control PROMs between baseline and W12. A statistically significant increase in FCP was observed [31 µg/g vs. 47 µg/g; p = 0.008], although this was unlikely to be clinically relevant. The most common adverse drug reaction reported was injection site reactions [15%]. Based on this cohort of patients, an expected reduction of £572,000 per annum is likely to be achieved. Conclusions Transitioning patients established on IV vedolizumab to SC appears to be safe and effective, with high patient satisfaction and multiple benefits for the health service.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Anti-tumor necrosis factor (anti-TNF) therapies are the most widely used biologic drugs for treating immune-mediated diseases, but repeated administration can induce the formation of anti-drug antibodies. The ability to identify patients at increased risk for development of anti-drug antibodies would facilitate selection of therapy and use of preventative strategies.METHODS: We performed a genome-wide association study to identify variants associated with time to development of anti-drug antibodies in a discovery cohort of 1240 biologic-naïve patients with Crohn's disease starting infliximab or adalimumab therapy. Immunogenicity was defined as an anti-drug antibody titer ≥10 AU/mL using a drug-tolerant enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Significant association signals were confirmed in a replication cohort of 178 patients with inflammatory bowel disease.RESULTS: The HLA-DQA1*05 allele, carried by approximately 40% of Europeans, significantly increased the rate of immunogenicity (hazard ratio [HR], 1.90; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.60-2.25; P = 5.88 × 10-13). The highest rates of immunogenicity, 92% at 1 year, were observed in patients treated with infliximab monotherapy who carried HLA-DQA1*05; conversely the lowest rates of immunogenicity, 10% at 1 year, were observed in patients treated with adalimumab combination therapy who did not carry HLA-DQA1*05. We confirmed this finding in the replication cohort (HR, 2.00; 95% CI, 1.35-2.98; P = 6.60 × 10-4). This association was consistent for patients treated with adalimumab (HR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.32-2.70) or infliximab (HR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.57-2.33), and for patients treated with anti-TNF therapy alone (HR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.37-2.22) or in combination with an immunomodulator (HR, 2.01; 95% CI, 1.57-2.58).CONCLUSIONS: In an observational study, we found a genome-wide significant association between HLA-DQA1*05 and the development of antibodies against anti-TNF agents. A randomized controlled biomarker trial is required to determine whether pretreatment testing for HLA-DQA1*05 improves patient outcomes by helping physicians select anti-TNF and combination therapies. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03088449.

Introduction The infliximab biosimilar SB2 was approved in the EU (2016, Flixabi®) and the US (2017, Renflexis®) for the same indications as the reference product (Remicade®) based on a robust analytical and clinical data package. Areas covered This systematic literature review summarizes available analytical and clinical data on SB2, including randomized controlled clinical trials and real-world evidence studies. Overall, 184 articles and congress abstracts were identified (excluding duplicates), whereof 5 reports on analytical data, four reports on two randomized controlled trials and 13 reports of real-world evidence studies were included. Expert opinion The available analytical and clinical data support the equivalence of SB2 to the reference product across approved indications. This is further supported by emerging real-world evidence, particularly in extrapolated indications such as inflammatory bowel disease for both infliximab-naive patients and patients already established on infliximab switching to SB2. Switching from originator or biosimilar infliximab to SB2 including both single and multiple switches was not associated with an increased risk of loss of treatment response or any safety or immunogenicity concerns. Overall, the approved infliximab biosimilar SB2 is safe and effective in clinical practice across licensed indications.

Introduction: The purpose of this review is to highlight the role of biosimilars in early treatment in IBD and introduce ways to facilitate a patient-centric switching process through multi...

ObjectiveTo understand the effectiveness of ustekinumab in treating Crohn’s disease (CD) in a UK real-world setting.DesignRetrospective cohort study using prospectively maintained clinical records.SettingSingle UK inflammatory bowel disease centre.PatientsAdult patients with an established diagnosis of CD prescribed ustekinumab outside of clinical trials at University Hospital Southampton (UHS).InterventionsUstekinumab, a monoclonal antibody to the shared p40 subunit of interleukin (IL) 12 and IL-23 as part of routine clinical care.Main outcome measuresEffectiveness as measured by an improvement in physician’s global assessment, drug persistence and improvement in biomarkers (C-reactive protein (CRP), albumin and calprotectin).Results84 patients were included, 72 had a postinduction review and 49 had 1-year data. At postinduction clinical review, clinical response occurred in 53% of patients and clinical remission occurred in 8%. For patients on ustekinumab at 1 year, clinical response occurred in 71% and remission in 14%. Adverse events included four patients with infections requiring admission, one drug-related rash, five CD surgeries and two CD exacerbations.ConclusionsUstekinumab was well tolerated in a complex UK CD population and demonstrated benefit to patients in terms of clinical response and improvement of biomarkers and with some patients attaining clinical remission. No unexpected safety signals were seen.

BACKGROUND: Anti-TNF drugs are effective treatments for the management of Crohn's disease but treatment failure is common. We aimed to identify clinical and pharmacokinetic factors that predict primary non-response at week 14 after starting treatment, non-remission at week 54, and adverse events leading to drug withdrawal. METHODS: The personalised anti-TNF therapy in Crohn's disease study (PANTS) is a prospective observational UK-wide study. We enrolled anti-TNF-naive patients (aged ≥6 years) with active luminal Crohn's disease at the time of first exposure to infliximab or adalimumab between March 7, 2013, and July 15, 2016. Patients were evaluated for 12 months or until drug withdrawal. Demographic data, smoking status, age at diagnosis, disease duration, location, and behaviour, previous medical and drug history, and previous Crohn's disease-related surgeries were recorded at baseline. At every visit, disease activity score, weight, therapy, and adverse events were recorded; drug and total anti-drug antibody concentrations were also measured. Treatment failure endpoints were primary non-response at week 14, non-remission at week 54, and adverse events leading to drug withdrawal. We used regression analyses to identify which factors were associated with treatment failure. FINDINGS:We enrolled 955 patients treated with infliximab (753 with originator; 202 with biosimilar) and 655 treated with adalimumab. Primary non-response occurred in 295 (23·8%, 95% CI 21·4-26·2) of 1241 patients who were assessable at week 14. Non-remission at week 54 occurred in 764 (63·1%, 60·3-65·8) of 1211 patients who were assessable, and adverse events curtailed treatment in 126 (7·8%, 6·6-9·2) of 1610 patients. In multivariable analysis, the only factor independently associated with primary non-response was low drug concentration at week 14 (infliximab: odds ratio 0·35 [95% CI 0·20-0·62], p=0·00038; adalimumab: 0·13 [0·06-0·28], p

ObjectiveDelayed second dose SARS-CoV-2 vaccination trades maximal effectiveness for a lower level of immunity across more of the population. We investigated whether patients with inflammatory bowel disease treated with infliximab have attenuated serological responses to a single dose of a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine.DesignAntibody responses and seroconversion rates in infliximab-treated patients (n=865) were compared with a cohort treated with vedolizumab (n=428), a gut-selective anti-integrin α4β7 monoclonal antibody. Our primary outcome was anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) antibody concentrations, measured using the Elecsys anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) antibody assay 3–10 weeks after vaccination, in patients without evidence of prior infection. Secondary outcomes were seroconversion rates (defined by a cut-off of 15 U/mL), and antibody responses following past infection or a second dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine.ResultsGeometric mean (SD) anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody concentrations were lower in patients treated with infliximab than vedolizumab, following BNT162b2 (6.0 U/mL (5.9) vs 28.8 U/mL (5.4) pConclusionInfliximab is associated with attenuated immunogenicity to a single dose of the BNT162b2 and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. Vaccination after SARS-CoV-2 infection, or a second dose of vaccine, led to seroconversion in most patients. Delayed second dosing should be avoided in patients treated with infliximab.Trial registration numberISRCTN45176516.

BackgroundDelayed second-dose SARS-CoV-2 vaccination trades maximal effectiveness for a lower level of immunity across more of the population. We investigated whether patients with inflammatory bowel disease treated with infliximab have attenuated serological responses to a single-dose of a SARS-CoV-2 vaccine.MethodsAntibody responses and seroconversion rates in infliximab-treated patients (n=865) were compared to a cohort treated with vedolizumab (n=428), a gut-selective anti-integrin α4β7 monoclonal antibody. Our primary outcome was anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) antibody concentrations 3-10 weeks after vaccination in patients without evidence of prior infection. Secondary outcomes were seroconversion rates, and antibody responses following past infection or a second dose of the BNT162b2 vaccine.FindingsGeometric mean [SD] anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody concentrations were lower in patients treated with infliximab than vedolizumab, following BNT162b2 (6.0 U/mL [5.9] vs 28.8 U/mL [5.4] PInterpretationInfliximab is associated with attenuated immunogenicity to a single-dose of the BNT162b2 and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 SARS-CoV-2 vaccines. Vaccination after SARS-CoV-2 infection, or a second dose of vaccine, led to seroconversion in most patients. Delayed second dosing should be avoided in patients treated with infliximab.FundingRoyal Devon and Exeter and Hull University Hospital Foundation NHS Trusts. Unrestricted educational grants: F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG (Switzerland), Biogen GmbH (Switzerland), Celltrion Healthcare (South Korea) and Galapagos NV (Belgium).Research in contextEvidence before this studyFaced with further surges of SARS-CoV-2 infection, a growing number of countries, including the UK, have opted to delay second vaccine doses for all people. This strategy trades maximal effectiveness against a lower level of protective immunity across more of the at-risk population.We have previously shown that seroprevalence, seroconversion in PCR-confirmed cases, and the magnitude of anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibodies following SARS-CoV-2 infection are reduced in infliximab-compared with vedolizumab-treated patients. Whether single-doses of vaccines are effective in patients treated with anti-TNF therapies is unknown.We searched PubMed from 25 November 2019 to 23 March 2021 with the terms “anti-tumour necrosis factor” or “anti-integrin” or “infliximab” or “adalimumab” or “vedolizumab” or “biological therapy” or “biologic therapy” AND “SARS-CoV-2” or “coronavirus” or “COVID-19” or AND “seroprevalence” or “seroconversion” or “antibody” or “antibody response” or “magnitude” or “immunogenicity” AND “vaccine” or “vaccination” or “immunisation” or “immunization” or “ChAdOx1 nCoV-19” or “BNT162b2” or “mRNA-1273”, without restriction on language.Serological responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines have been reported in registration trials and small observational cohorts of healthy volunteers. Two small studies, including one unpublished preprint, found that COVID-19 vaccine immunogenicity rates were lower in transplant recipients and patients with malignancy receiving immunosuppressive therapy, and fewer patients treated with potent immunosuppressants seroconverted than healthy controls. No studies have assessed the effect of anti-TNF therapy on immunogenicity following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination.Added value of this studyTo test if anti-TNF drugs attenuate serological responses to primary SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, we analysed anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike (S) antibody concentrations and seroconversion rates in 1293 patients with inflammatory bowel disease who received primary vaccinations with either the ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 or BNT162b2 vaccines. 865 were treated with the anti-TNF drug infliximab and outcomes were compared to a reference cohort of 428 patients treated with vedolizumab, a gut selective anti-integrin α4β7 monoclonal antibody that is not associated with impaired systemic immune responses.Anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels and rates of seroconversion were lower following primary vaccination with both the BNT162b2 and ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccines in patients with IBD treated with infliximab compared to vedolizumab. Older age, immunomodulator use, Crohn’s disease (versus ulcerative colitis or inflammatory bowel disease unclassified), and current smoking were associated with lower anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody concentrations, irrespective of vaccine type. Non-white ethnicity was associated with higher anti-SARS-CoV-2 (S) antibody concentrations following primary vaccination with both vaccines. Antibody concentrations and seroconversion rates were higher in patients with past SARS-CoV-2 infection prior to a single-dose of either vaccine, and after 2 doses of the BNT162b2 vaccine.Implications of the available evidenceOur findings have important implications for patients treated with anti-TNF therapy, particularly for those also treated with an immunomodulator. Poor antibody responses to a single-dose of vaccine exposes these patients to a potential increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection. However, higher rates of seroconversion in patients with two exposures to SARS-CoV-2 antigen, even in the presence of TNF blockade, suggest that all patients receiving these drugs should be prioritized for optimally timed second doses. Until patients receive a second vaccine dose, they should consider that they are not protected from SARS-CoV-2 infection and continue to practice enhanced physical distancing and shielding if appropriate. Even after two antigen exposures, a small subset of patients failed to mount an antibody response. Antibody testing and adapted vaccine schedules should be considered to protect these at-risk patients.

The biosimilar concept is now well established. Clinical data accumulated pre- and post-approval have supported biosimilar uptake, in turn stimulating competition in the biologics market and increasing patient access to biologics. Following technological advances, other innovative biologics, such as "biobetters" or "value-added medicines," are now reaching the market. These innovative biologics differ from the reference product by offering additional clinical or non-clinical benefits. We discuss these innovative biologics with reference to CT-P13, initially available as an intravenous (IV) biosimilar of reference infliximab. A subcutaneous (SC) formulation, CT-P13 SC, has now been developed. Relative to CT-P13 IV, CT-P13 SC offers clinical benefits in terms of pharmacokinetics, with comparable efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity, as well as increased convenience for patients and reduced demands on healthcare system resources. As was once the case for biosimilars, nomenclature and regulatory pathways for innovative biologics require clarification to support their uptake and ultimately benefit patients. ispartof: MABS vol:13 issue:1 ispartof: location:United States status: published

Introduction Aligned to the 2019 IBD Standards, IBD UK developed a national Benchmarking Tool comprising a Service Self-Assessment for healthcare professionals and a Patient Survey. The aim was to qualify current local service performance to facilitate future quality improvement. Methods The IBD Patient Survey ran from 8/7/19–22/11/19, and predominantly focussed on patient experience in the preceding 12 months. The Service Self-Assessment ran from 1/10/19–31/1/20. Estimates were encouraged where formal audit data was not available. Results 10222 patients and 166 IBD (Inflammatory Bowel Disease) services (134 adult, 32 paediatric) completed the tools. Services cared for a median of 2000 adult (IQR 1400-3500) or 165 paediatric (IQR 100-280) patients. 38% (12/32) of paediatric and 21% (28/134) adult services saw >90% of patients with suspected IBD within 4 weeks of referral. 54% (1133/2104) of recently diagnosed patients felt what mattered to them was taken into account when making decisions about treatment and care. During a flare 77% (127/166) of services reported being able to respond to >90% of patients contacting the IBD service advice line by the end of the next working day. 61% (6174/10071) of patients reported having contacted their IBD service advice line. When admitted to hospital 54% (89/166) of services reported >90% of patients were seen within 24 hours of admission by an IBD specialist on a gastroenterology ward. For elective surgery 69% (114/166) of services reported waiting times of Conclusions The IBD UK Benchmarking Tool provides location-matched service performance and patient experience data. To support and measure impact of quality improvement, the Tool will be repeated longitudinally.

Introduction Oral corticosteroids continue to play a key role in inducing remission in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) but are not effective as maintenance agents. Avoiding prolonged courses of treatment is an important strategy to minimise side effects. The UK IBD Registry has established an infrastructure capable of recording prescribing at point-of-care using a range of different local systems and software, including direct capture from local operational records. We investigated the feasibility of extracting data to undertake audit of steroid prescribing for hospitals participating in the Registry. Methods Data submitted to the UK IBD Registry were analysed over three consecutive fiscal years (2016/17, 2017/18 and 2018/19). All prescriptions for oral steroids (prednisolone or budesonide) with a record of both a start and stop date were extracted and linked to patient characteristics. We compared the mean duration of steroid courses initiated in each year and the proportion lasting eight weeks or less. Results There were 2,156 prescriptions (prednisolone 83%; budesonide 17%) with a start and stop date, relating to 1,591 patients treated at 42 hospitals. Three quarters (77.4%) of cases had a single steroid prescription recorded over the three year time period (5.8% had >2). Results are summarised in the table 1. There was a year-on-year reduction in the mean duration of recorded steroid courses from 13.0 to 8.4 weeks (p Conclusion IBD teams participating in the UK IBD Registry have achieved a reduction in the duration of steroid treatment courses, suggesting progress in efforts to avoid prolonged steroid exposure. The Registry has established an infrastructure capable of serving as a platform for future nationwide prospective steroid audit.

Introduction Malnutrition in patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) is a risk factor for postoperative complications including anastomotic breakdown, prolonged hospitalisation and increased mortality.1 Pre-operative dietary therapy has been shown to improve post-operative outcomes in patients with Crohn’s disease.2 This study investigates nutritional care of patients pre and post IBD surgery. Methods All surgical episodes in patients with IBD between 1/1/2018 & 31/12/2018 were extracted from University Hospital Southampton Databases. Non-IBD or non-resection surgeries were excluded. Each electronic case record was manually examined for evidence of the following: Pre and or post-operative Dietitian input, Pre-operative nutritional support prescription, Body Mass Index (BMI) pre-op, operation and post-op, Iron status checked pre-op, Vitamin B12 checked and or replaced post-op. A data protection impact assessment was completed and approved by the Trust Information Governance. Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test was used to measure differences between BMI values at each time point. Results Of 1,012 cases, 72 were confirmed IBD resections. There was a statistically significant fall in weight between pre op and admission with 23% losing >5%,14% >10% and 9% >20% (p:0.005). Weight loss was also identified pre vs post-op (p:0.002) and between operative & discharge weights (p:0.05). 43% were seen by a dietician pre-op and 51%(n=37) were seen post op. 88% (n=7) of patients with a low pre-op BMI ( Conclusions This study confirms patients with IBD have inconsistent nutritional assessment and monitoring in the pre & post-operative period. Weight loss is common and those with a normal BMI may not be referred for a dietetic assessment. A formal peri-operative nutritional care pathway should be implemented to ensure optimal care. References Michel Adamina, Konstantinos Gerasimidis, Rotem Sigall-Boneh, et al.Perioperative Dietary Therapy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease. Journal of Crohn’s and Colitis, 2019 1–14. Dreznik Y, Horesh N, Gutman M, et al. Preoperative nutritional optimisation for Crohn’s disease patients can improve surgical outcome. Dig Surg 2018; 35:442–7.

Introduction Patients with suspected IBD referred by primary care (GP) are traditionally seen in gastroenterology outpatient clinics followed by endoscopic investigations. This 2 phase model leads to delay in diagnosis and treatment, increasing pressure on gastroenterology outpatient services while still requiring endoscopic intervention. Our novel pilot project compared outcomes between direct-access IBD physician-delivered endoscopy versus the traditional clinic model for patients with suspected IBD. Method A prospective cohort of consecutive patients referred by GP with suspected IBD were triaged either direct to IBD endoscopy (n=50) or to outpatient IBD clinic followed by IBD endoscopy (n=50) at the discretion of 10 gastroenterology consultants grading GP referrals. Data on demographics, faecal calprotectin, C-reactive protein, endoscopy outcomes, treatment, and follow up was collected. (Group A = direct to IBD endoscopy and Group B = IBD endoscopy via IBD clinic). Results Both groups were age and gender-matched. Group A had a higher mean calprotectin (1363 ug/g vs 302 ug/g) and a higher C-reactive protein (10.6 mg/l vs 4.5 mg/l). In Group A only 38% had a full colonoscopy versus 86% in Group B. Definitive diagnosis and treatment at time of IBD endoscopy took 27 days in Group A versus 212 days in Group B. Treatment with immunomodulators and biologics was similar in both groups but mesalazine and steroid use was higher in Group A due to more severe disease and higher rate of ulcerative colitis, table 1 shows the diagnostic breakdowns from both groups following endoscopy. The IBD pick up was significantly higher in Group A with 70% vs 42%. Endoscopy DNA rate was twice as high in Group B (n=6). The direct to IBD endoscopy pathway resulted in 50 less initial IBD consultant clinics (100% reduction) with a follow-up shift from IBD consultant to IBD nurse clinics. Conclusion Triaging patients referred with suspected IBD directly to IBD physician delivered endoscopy resulted in more than a 26-week reduction in time to diagnosis and treatment while saving 100% of initial IBD consultant clinics. IBD pick up was high at 70% in direct to IBD endoscopy group, identifying a higher-need IBD population. Triaging GP referrals with suspected IBD direct to IBD endoscopy delivers rapid assessment and treatment.

Primary non-response and secondary loss of response remain a significant issue with the currently available treatment options for a significant proportion of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). There are multiple unmet needs in the IBD treatment algorithm and new treatment options are required. As our understanding of the pathogenesis of IBD evolves, new therapeutic targets are being identified. The JAK-STAT pathway has been extensively studied. Tofacitinib, a JAK1 inhibitor, is now licensed for use in the induction and maintenance of ulcerative colitis and there are a large number of molecules currently under investigation. These new small molecule drugs (SMDs) will challenge current treatment pathways at a time when clinical therapeutic outcomes are rapidly evolving and becoming more ambitious. This is a review of the current JAK1 inhibitors in IBD including the current evidence from clinical trials.

ObjectiveCOVID-19 has disrupted the normal way of life in the UK, but for some patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), the impact of this unprecedented global emergency was far greater. We aimed to assess the experience of patients with IBD during the COVID-19 lockdown.DesignWe designed a survey focused on the impact of COVID-19 on IBD healthcare, social and psychological well-being and quality of life. To capture those most likely to be affected we targeted survey invitations at our British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) defined high and moderate-risk IBD population. Access to the survey was also available via our trust’s social media pages.Results685 responses were received. 76% of respondents categorised themselves in BSG defined moderate or high-risk groups, requiring stringent social distancing or shielding. 87% did not change their IBD medication, with most reported changes initiated by the IBD team. 39% were worried about their IBD care, but most services were largely uninterrupted. 90% received ‘at-risk’ notification often from multiple sources, but 17% not until May. The majority reported a negative impact of COVID-19 on their quality of life and significantly increased perceived stress. Patients expressed a strong wish of having future care delivered remotely.ConclusionCOVID-19 has had a significant negative impact on psychological well-being of patients with IBD. Local IBD services must have a robust data set of vulnerable patients and be designated future responsibility for prompt communication of advice to avoid delayed and sometimes conflicting information. Remote patient management systems should be further developed and embedded in clinical practice.

ObjectiveTo assess outcomes in patients with iron-deficient inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) treated with ferric maltol in UK real-world practice.Design/MethodThis observational, multicentre, retrospective cohort study included adults with IBD and iron-deficiency anaemia (IDA; haemoglobin ≥95 to ResultsThirty of 59 patients had data for the primary outcome, 19 of whom (63%) achieved haemoglobin normalisation at week 12. Mean±SD haemoglobin was 127±16 g/L at week 12 (increase of 14±17 g/L from baseline). Overall, 27 patients achieved haemoglobin normalisation by the end of the observation period; mean±SD time to normalisation was 49.5±25.6 days. Nine of 17 patients had normalised serum ferritin (30–300 µg/L) at week 12, and 16 patients had normalised ferritin at the end of the observation period; mean±SD time to normalisation was 71.3±27.6 days. Twenty-four adverse events occurred in 19 patients (32%); most frequent adverse events were abdominal pain or discomfort (n=9) and constipation (n=3).ConclusionFerric maltol increases haemoglobin and iron indices and is generally well tolerated in patients with IBD and IDA treated in clinical practice. These real-world data support findings from randomised controlled trials.

ObjectiveSymptoms and clinical course during inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) vary among individuals. Personalised care is therefore essential to effective management, delivered by a strong patient-centred multidisciplinary team, working within a well-designed service. This study aimed to fully rewrite the UK Standards for the healthcare of adults and children with IBD, and to develop an IBD Service Benchmarking Tool to support current and future personalised care models.DesignLed by IBD UK, a national multidisciplinary alliance of patients and nominated representatives from all major stakeholders in IBD care, Standards requirements were defined by survey data collated from 689 patients and 151 healthcare professionals. Standards were drafted and refined over three rounds of modified electronic-Delphi.ResultsConsensus was achieved for 59 Standards covering seven clinical domains; (1) design and delivery of the multidisciplinary IBD service; (2) prediagnostic referral pathways, protocols and timeframes; (3) holistic care of the newly diagnosed patient; (4) flare management to support patient empowerment, self-management and access to specialists where required; (5) surgery including appropriate expertise, preoperative information, psychological support and postoperative care; (6) inpatient medical care delivery (7) and ongoing long-term care in the outpatient department and primary care setting including shared care. Using these patient-centred Standards and informed by the IBD Quality Improvement Project (IBDQIP), this paper presents a national benchmarking framework.ConclusionsThe Standards and Benchmarking Tool provide a framework for healthcare providers and patients to rate the quality of their service. This will recognise excellent care, and promote quality improvement, audit and service development in IBD.

Background and Aims Mucosal healing is important in Crohn’s disease therapies. Epithelial homeostasis becomes dysregulated in Crohn’s, with increased permeability, inflammation, and diarrhoea. MicroRNAs are small non-coding RNAs that regulate gene expression and show changes in inflammatory bowel disease. Tumour necrosis factor alpha [TNFα] inhibitor protein 3 is raised in Crohn’s and regulates TNFα-mediated activation of NFκB. We investigated TNFα regulation by microRNA in Crohn’s disease [CD], and studied effects on epithelial permeability and inflammation. Methods Colonic epithelium from CD and healthy donor biopsies was isolated using laser capture microdissection, and microRNA was quantified. Tumour necrosis factor alpha inhibitor protein 3 was characterised immunohistochemically on serial sections. Expression effect of microRNA was confirmed with luciferase reporter assays. Functional barrier permeability studies and innate cytokine release were investigated with cell and explant culture studies. Results MicroRNA23a levels significantly increased in colonic Crohn’s epithelium compared with healthy epithelium. Luciferase reporter assays in transfected epithelial cells confirmed that microRNA23a repressed expression via the 3’ untranslated region of tumour necrosis factor alpha inhibitor protein 3 mRNA, coinciding with increased NFκB-mediated transcription. Immunohistochemical staining of TNFAIP3 protein in colonic biopsies was reduced or absent in adjacent Crohn’s sections, correlating inversely with microRNA23a levels and encompassing some intercohort variation. Overexpression of microRNA23a increased epithelial barrier permeability in a colonic epithelial model and increased inflammatory cytokine release in cultured explant biopsies, mimicking Crohn’s disease characteristics. Conclusions MicroRNA23a overexpression in colonic Crohn’s epithelium represses tumour necrosis factor alpha inhibitor protein 3, enhancing sensitivity to TNFα, with increased intestinal permeability and cytokine release.

Symptomatic ulcerative colitis (UC) can be a chronic, disabling condition. Flares in disease activity are associated with many of the negative impacts of mild-to-moderate UC. Rapid resolution of flares can provide benefits to patients and healthcare systems. i Support Therapy-Access to Rapid Treatment (iSTART) introduces patient-centered care for mild-to-moderate UC. iSTART provides patients with the ability to self-assess symptomology and self-start a short course of second-line treatment when necessary. An international panel of experts produced consensus statements and recommendations. These were informed by evidence from systematic reviews on the epidemiology, mesalazine (5-ASA) treatment, and patient use criteria for second-line therapy in UC. Optimized 5-ASA is the first-line treatment in all clinical guidelines, but may not be sufficient to induce remission in all patients. Corticosteroids should be prescribed as second-line therapy when needed, with budesonide MMX® being a preferred steroid option. Active involvement of suitable patients in management of UC flares has the potential to improve therapy, with patients able to show good accuracy for flare self-assessment using validated tools. There is a place in the UC treatment pathway for an approach such as iSTART, which has the potential to provide patient, clinical and economic benefits. ispartof: INTESTINAL RESEARCH vol:16 issue:4 pages:522-+ ispartof: location:Korea (South) status: published

International audience; Iron deficiency without anemia and iron deficiency anemia are common and frequently overlooked complications of inflammatory bowel disease. Despite the frequency and impact of iron deficiency in inflammatory bowel disease, there are gaps in our understanding about its incidence, prevalence and natural history and, consequently, patients may be undertreated. Medical registries have a key role in collecting data on the disease’s natural history, the safety and effectiveness of drugs in routine clinical practice, and the quality of care delivered by healthcare services. Even though iron deficiency impacts inflammatory bowel disease patients and healthcare systems substantially, none of the established European inflammatory bowel disease registries systematically collects information on iron parameters and related outcomes. Collection of robust iron parameter data from patient registries is one way to heighten awareness about the importance of iron deficiency in this disease and to generate data to improve the quality of patient care, patient outcomes, and thus quality of life. This objective could be achieved through collection of specific laboratory, clinical, and patient-reported measurements that could be incorporated into existing registries. This review describes the status of current European inflammatory bowel disease registries and the data they generate, in order to highlight their potential role in collecting iron data, to discuss how such information gathering could contribute to our understanding of iron deficiency anemia, and to provide practical information in regard to the incorporation of accumulated iron parameter data into registries.

Background iBaSS is a phase IV single-centre, prospective, randomised, single-blind, cross-over study in adults with Crohn’s disease. 112 participants have been recruited from patients attending the IBD clinic for routine treatment. Eligibility criteria included mHBI < 8, stable on Humira™ or Imraldi™ with no expectation to discontinue or adjust adalimumab (ADA) dosing in the study period. The pragmatic study design mimics the optimal care pathway of patients transitioning between originator and biosimilar ADA, allowing all participants to experience both. Such transitions are part of routine clinical practice but with little understanding of the patient perspective. As part of iBaSS we capture the patient perspective and experience of transition, with the aim of informing future practice. Methods Purposive sampling was used to capture a wide range of perspectives from a subset of the participants treated with the originator ADA at enrolment. Interviews were semi-structured, using open-ended questions, facilitated by a topic guide developed with reference to published literature. Interviews were recorded, transcribed and analysed using thematic analysis. Thirty five participants were interviewed. Results Five themes were identified: (1) understanding and awareness of biosimilars, (2) motivation to undertake transition, (3) initial concerns, (4) reassuring factors and (5) reflection of experience. Opinions expressed were often heterogeneous, but commonly-occurring experiences were also identified. Prior awareness of biosimilars and knowledge of the biosimilar concept was low indicating a disparity between healthcare professionals and patients. Patients accept a biosimilar transition to minimise drug expenditure. Prior to undertaking biosimilar transition away from the brand they had experienced, efficacy and adverse effects were common concerns for patients. Trust in the healthcare team is critical to patient acceptance of biosimilars and important reassurances include a point of contact, education about biosimilars and specific monitoring. When reflecting on the experience, participants noted little subjective difference in efficacy or tolerability (although 22 participants specifically mentioned injection pain) following brand transition and the majority feel comfortable with future transition to another ADA biosimilar. Injection experience is important in patient satisfaction. Conclusion While biosimilars have driven a reduction in drug acquisition costs, the majority of patients have little knowledge and some concerns about transitioning to a biosimilar but accept the principles and can be reassured. The wide-ranging views elucidated suggest that a tailored, patient-centred approach is key to successful implementation.

Summary Background The UK IBD Audit Programme reported improved inpatient care processes for ulcerative colitis (UC) between 2005 and 2013. There are no independent data describing national or institutional trends in patient outcomes over this period. Aim To assess the association between the outcome of emergency admission for UC and year of treatment. Methods Retrospective analysis of hospital administrative data, focused on all emergency admissions to English public hospitals with a discharge diagnosis of UC. We extracted case mix factors (age, sex, co‐morbidity, emergency bed days in last year, deprivation status), outcomes of index admission (death and first surgery), 30‐day emergency readmissions (all‐cause, and selected causes) and outcome of readmission. Results There were 765 deaths and 3837 unplanned first operations in 44 882 emergency admissions, with 5311 emergency readmissions (with a further 171 deaths and 517 first operations). Case mix adjusted odds of death for any given year were 9% lower (OR 0.91, 95% CI: 0.89‐0.94), and that for emergency surgery 3% lower (OR 0.97, 95% CI: 0.95‐0.98) than the preceding year. Results were robust to sensitivity analysis (admissions lasting ≥4 days). There was no reduction in odds for all‐cause readmission, but rates for venous thromboembolism declined significantly. Analysis of institutional‐level metrics across 136 providers showed a stepwise reduction in outliers for mortality and unplanned surgery. Conclusions Risk of death and unplanned surgery for UC patients admitted as emergencies declined consistently, as did unexplained variation between hospitals. Risk of readmission was unchanged (over 1 in 10). Multiple factors are likely to explain these nationwide trends.

Introduction Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients calling our specialist nurse led IBD flare line with worsening symptoms were traditionally seen in outpatient clinics before being referred for endoscopy to evaluate disease activity. Non-IBD endoscopists often deferred treatment decisions until subsequent IBD outpatient appointments (OPA), leading to delays in treatment and pressure on IBD OPA workload. Methods In January 2016 “flare slots” on dedicated IBD endoscopy lists were introduced. Patients with flare symptoms submitted stool for enteric pathogen exclusion and those subsequently deemed suitable were directly booked to a flare slot on an IBD endoscopy list, if available. Anonymised data was systematically extracted from clinical systems for the first 6 months of 2016, 2017 and 2018 regarding endoscopy outcomes leading to change in treatment and number of OPA in the respective years. Change in treatment was defined as start/stop of medication, urgent investigation to guide treatment or admission to hospital. Results For the first six months of 2016, 2017 and 2018, data identified 90, 92 and 92 IBD flare line-triggered flexible sigmoidoscopies respectively. Overall 74.6% had ulcerative colitis and the remainder Crohn’s disease (22.3%) or IBDU (1.3%). In 2016, 63.3% of procedures were performed by IBD physicians, which increased to 77.2% and 79.3% in 2017 and 2018 respectively. IBD endoscopists initiated change in treatment following their procedures in 70.2% (2016), 74.7% (2017) and 84.9% (2018) of cases, compared to 9.1%, 14.3% and 5.3% of non-IBD endoscopist procedures over the same period. Total gastroenterology outpatient appointments within the year in this population were 232 (2016), 214 (2017) and 111 (2018); a 52.2% decrease from 2016 to 2018. Nurse-led outpatient appointments following IBD flare flexible sigmoidoscopy increased from 19 in 2016 to 51 in 2017 and 53 in 2018, when they constituted 47% of OPA in this group. This represented a 72.8% (155 OPA) reduction in consultant appointments from 2016 to 2018 (Figure1). Conclusion Changing the model of service delivery for acute IBD flares by combining IBD physician delivered endoscopy with proactive management decisions resulted in a change of management in 84.9% of patients. This reduced overall IBD OPA by 52.2%, while increasing nurse led follow up clinics in this cohort to 47% leading to a total 72.2% reduction in consultant OPA.