8 results on '"Franzoi, Daniele"'
Search Results
2. Which individual, social, and urban factors in early childhood predict psychopathology in later childhood, adolescence and young adulthood? A systematic review
- Author
-
Franzoi, Daniele, Bockting, Claudi L., Bennett, Kirsty F., Odom, Annick, Lucassen, Paul J., Pathania, Alisha, Lee, Alexandra, Brouwer, Marlies E., van de Schoot, Rens, Wiers, Reinout W., and Breedvelt, Josefien J.F.
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. Which individual, social, and urban factors in early childhood predict psychopathology in later childhood, adolescence and young adulthood? A systematic review
- Author
-
Leerstoel Bockting, Leerstoel Schoot, Methodology and statistics for the behavioural and social sciences, Franzoi, Daniele, Bockting, Claudi L., Bennett, Kirsty F., Odom, Annick, Lucassen, Paul J., Pathania, Alisha, Lee, Alexandra, Brouwer, Marlies E., van de Schoot, Rens, Wiers, Reinout W., Breedvelt, Josefien J.F., Leerstoel Bockting, Leerstoel Schoot, Methodology and statistics for the behavioural and social sciences, Franzoi, Daniele, Bockting, Claudi L., Bennett, Kirsty F., Odom, Annick, Lucassen, Paul J., Pathania, Alisha, Lee, Alexandra, Brouwer, Marlies E., van de Schoot, Rens, Wiers, Reinout W., and Breedvelt, Josefien J.F.
- Published
- 2024
4. COVID-19 and common mental health symptoms in the early phase of the pandemic: An umbrella review of the evidence
- Author
-
Witteveen, Anke B., Young, Susanne Y., Cuijpers, Pim, Ayuso-Mateos, José Luis, Barbui, Corrado, Bertolini, Federico, Cabello, Maria, Cadorin, Camilla, Downes, Naomi, Franzoi, Daniele, Gasior, Michael, Gray, Brandon, Melchior, Maria, van Ommeren, Mark, Palantza, Christina, Purgato, Marianna, van der Waerden, Judith, Wang, Siyuan, and Sijbrandij, Marit
- Subjects
Biological sciences - Abstract
Background There remains uncertainty about the impact of the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on mental health. This umbrella review provides a comprehensive overview of the association between the pandemic and common mental disorders. We qualitatively summarized evidence from reviews with meta-analyses of individual study-data in the general population, healthcare workers, and specific at-risk populations. Methods and findings A systematic search was carried out in 5 databases for peer-reviewed systematic reviews with meta-analyses of prevalence of depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms during the pandemic published between December 31, 2019 until August 12, 2022. We identified 123 reviews of which 7 provided standardized mean differences (SMDs) either from longitudinal pre- to during pandemic study-data or from cross-sectional study-data compared to matched pre-pandemic data. Methodological quality rated with the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews checklist scores (AMSTAR 2) instrument was generally low to moderate. Small but significant increases of depression, anxiety, and/or general mental health symptoms were reported in the general population, in people with preexisting physical health conditions, and in children (3 reviews; SMDs ranged from 0.11 to 0.28). Mental health and depression symptoms significantly increased during periods of social restrictions (1 review; SMDs of 0.41 and 0.83, respectively) but anxiety symptoms did not (SMD: 0.26). Increases of depression symptoms were generally larger and longer-lasting during the pandemic (3 reviews; SMDs depression ranged from 0.16 to 0.23) than those of anxiety (2 reviews: SMDs 0.12 and 0.18). Females showed a significantly larger increase in anxiety symptoms than males (1 review: SMD 0.15). In healthcare workers, people with preexisting mental disorders, any patient group, children and adolescents, and in students, no significant differences from pre- to during pandemic were found (2 reviews; SMD's ranging from -0.16 to 0.48). In 116 reviews pooled cross-sectional prevalence rates of depression, anxiety, and PTSD symptoms ranged from 9% to 48% across populations. Although heterogeneity between studies was high and largely unexplained, assessment tools and cut-offs used, age, sex or gender, and COVID-19 exposure factors were found to be moderators in some reviews. The major limitations are the inability to quantify and explain the high heterogeneity across reviews included and the shortage of within-person data from multiple longitudinal studies. Conclusions A small but consistent deterioration of mental health and particularly depression during early pandemic and during social restrictions has been found in the general population and in people with chronic somatic disorders. Also, associations between mental health and the pandemic were stronger in females and younger age groups than in others. Explanatory individual-level, COVID-19 exposure, and time-course factors were scarce and showed inconsistencies across reviews. For policy and research, repeated assessments of mental health in population panels including vulnerable individuals are recommended to respond to current and future health crises., Author(s): Anke B. Witteveen 1,*, Susanne Y. Young 1,2, Pim Cuijpers 1, José Luis Ayuso-Mateos 3,4, Corrado Barbui 5, Federico Bertolini 5, Maria Cabello 3,4, Camilla Cadorin 5, Naomi Downes [...]
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. Which individual, social, and urban factors in early childhood predict psychopathology in later childhood, adolescence and young adulthood? A systematic review
- Author
-
Franzoi, Daniele, primary, Bockting, Claudi, additional, Bennett, Kirsty F., additional, Odom, Annick, additional, Lucassen, Paul J., additional, Pathania, Alisha, additional, Lee, Alexandra, additional, Brouwer, Marlies, additional, van de Schoot, Rens, additional, Wiers, Reinout W., additional, and Breedvelt, Josefien, additional
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
6. Risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection, severe COVID-19 illness and COVID-19 mortality in people with pre-existing mental disorders: an umbrella review
- Author
-
Cadorin, Camilla, Bertolini, Federico, Witteveen, Anke, Young, Susanne, Cuijpers, Pim, Ayuso-Mateos, Jose, Barbui, Corrado, Cabello, María, Downes, Naomi, Franzoi, Daniele, Gasior, Michael, Gray, Brandon, John, Ann, Melchior, Maria, van Ommeren, Mark, Palantza, Christina, Purgato, Marianna, van der Waerden, Judith, Wang, Siyuan, Sijbrandij, Marit, Clinical Psychology, APH - Mental Health, World Health Organization (WHO) Collaborating Center, APH - Global Health, Clinical, Neuro- & Developmental Psychology, Università degli studi di Verona = University of Verona (UNIVR), Department of Clinical, Neuro and Developmental Psychology, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam [Amsterdam] (VU), Department of Psychiatry, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Princesa (IIS-Princesa), Department of Psychiatry, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique (iPLESP), Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM)-Sorbonne Université (SU), Department of Mental Health and Substance Use, World Health Organization, Swansea University, Université Pierre et Marie Curie - Paris 6 (UPMC)-Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM), Centre de Recherche en Informatique, Signal et Automatique de Lille - UMR 9189 (CRIStAL), and Centrale Lille-Université de Lille-Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)
- Subjects
Umbrella review ,Psychiatry and Mental health ,Sars-CoV-2 ,SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being ,[SDV]Life Sciences [q-bio] ,Mental health ,Pre-existing mental health disorders ,Mortality ,Covid-19 - Abstract
Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic has posed a serious health risk, especially in vulnerable populations. Even before the pandemic, people with mental disorders had worse physical health outcomes compared to the general population. This umbrella review investigated whether having a pre-pandemic mental disorder was associated with worse physical health outcomes due to the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods Following a pre-registered protocol available on the Open Science Framework platform, we searched Ovid MEDLINE All, Embase (Ovid), PsycINFO (Ovid), CINAHL, and Web of Science up to the 6th of October 2021 for systematic reviews on the impact of COVID-19 on people with pre-existing mental disorders. The following outcomes were considered: risk of contracting the SARS-CoV-2 infection, risk of severe illness, COVID-19 related mortality risk, risk of long-term physical symptoms after COVID-19. For meta-analyses, we considered adjusted odds ratio (OR) as effect size measure. Screening, data extraction and quality assessment with the AMSTAR 2 tool have been done in parallel and duplicate. Results We included five meta-analyses and four narrative reviews. The meta-analyses reported that people with any mental disorder had an increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection (OR: 1.71, 95% CI 1.09–2.69), severe illness course (OR from 1.32 to 1.77, 95%CI between 1.19–1.46 and 1.29–2.42, respectively) and COVID-19 related mortality (OR from 1.38 to 1.52, 95%CI between 1.15–1.65 and 1.20–1.93, respectively) as compared to the general population. People with anxiety disorders had an increased risk of SAR-CoV-2 infection, but not increased mortality. People with mood and schizophrenia spectrum disorders had an increased COVID-19 related mortality but without evidence of increased risk of severe COVID-19 illness. Narrative reviews were consistent with findings from the meta-analyses. Discussion and conclusions As compared to the general population, there is strong evidence showing that people with pre-existing mental disorders suffered from worse physical health outcomes due to the COVID-19 pandemic and may therefore be considered a risk group similar to people with underlying physical conditions. Factors likely involved include living accommodations with barriers to social distancing, cardiovascular comorbidities, psychotropic medications and difficulties in accessing high-intensity medical care.
- Published
- 2023
7. Additional file 1 of Risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection, severe COVID-19 illness and COVID-19 mortality in people with pre-existing mental disorders: an umbrella review
- Author
-
Bertolini, Federico, Witteveen, Anke B, Young, Susanne, Cuijpers, Pim, Ayuso-Mateos, Jose Luis, Barbui, Corrado, Cabello, María, Cadorin, Camilla, Downes, Naomi, Franzoi, Daniele, Gasior, Michael Elizabeth, Gray, Brandon, John, Ann, Melchior, Maria, van Ommeren, Mark, Palantza, Christina, Purgato, Marianna, Van der Waerden, Judith, Wang, Siyuan, and Sijbrandij, Marit
- Abstract
Supplementary Material 1
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
8. COVID-19 and Mental Health: An umbrella review of systematic reviews with or without meta-analyses
- Author
-
Witteveen, Anke, Young, Susanne, Cuijpers, Pim, Mateos, Jose, Barbui, Corrado, Federico, Bertolini, Cabello, Maria, Downes, Naomi, Franzoi, Daniele, Gasior, Michael, Gray, Brandon, Gunnell, David, John, Ann, Palantza, Christina, Purgato, Marianna, van der Waerden, Judith, van Ommeren, Mark, Wang, Siyuan, and Sijbrandij, Marit
- Subjects
FOS: Psychology ,Clinical Psychology ,Mental Disorders ,suicidality ,Medicine and Health Sciences ,psychological interventions ,Psychology ,COVID-19 ,Psychiatry and Psychology ,mental health disorders ,Social and Behavioral Sciences ,mental health care access ,vulnerable populations - Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has led to world-wide human suffering, which may include negative effects on mental health (United Nations, 2020). A great number of research projects have assessed the mental health impacts of COVID-19, which have been integrated into systematic reviews (SRs) with or without meta-analyses (MAs). Although some authors have reported direct and indirect negative effects of COVID-19 on specific mental health problems (e.g., depression or post-traumatic stress symptoms) and elevated generic psychological distress due to pandemic control measures (e.g., Dong et al., 2021; Xiong et al., 2020), other population-based studies indicated that most people are resilient and do not experience an increase in distress despite exposure to stressors (Pierce et al., 2021). Generally, findings from SRs and MAs are inconsistent and highly diverse in quality. Hence, proper understanding of the evidence on the impacts of COVID-19 on mental health is needed to correctly inform the global mental health response and to identify gaps in knowledge for further scientific research. The aim of this umbrella review is to synthesize the existing evidence of the impact of COVID-19 on mental health. To this end, the proposed umbrella review will answer the following questions: (1) What is the impact of COVID-19 on prevalence of mental health symptoms and mental health disorders among the general population, health care workers, and vulnerable groups and what is the mental health impact of COVID-19 over time during the pandemic? (2) What is the impact of COVID-19 on suicidal behaviour and suicidal thoughts prevalence in any population? (3) Are people living with pre COVID-19 existing mental health disorders at (increased) risk of severe illness and mortality and/or of contracting SARS-CoV-2 compared to any other population? (4) What is the impact of COVID-19 on access and delivery of mental health services and how have mental health services changed during the pandemic? (5a) What is the effectiveness of psychological interventions aimed to prevent and reduce mental health problems (depression, anxiety, posttraumatic stress, substance use, suicidal behaviours) and improve well-being and resilience related to COVID-19 and the epidemic control measures? (5b) What is the effectiveness of psychological interventions and strategies adapted to be delivered during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to psychological interventions as usual on the reduction of mental health problems and on access to mental health services during the pandemic?
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.