Search

The aim of endocrine therapy is to reduce the estrogenic stimulus for tumour growth. After failure of tamoxifen — the standard “first-line” hormonotherapy for advanced breast cancer (ABC) — the most frequently prescribed endocrine therapies are progestins and aromatase inhibitors (AIs) (“second-line” hormonotherapy). Estrogen deprivation through AIs provides effective treatment of hormone-dependent ABC in postmenopausal (PMP) women. Over the past few years, the goals of our research programme were to develop more potent, more selective and better tolerated AIs than our first AI, aminoglutethimide (AG). Lentaron® (4-hydroxyandrostenedione, formestane), a highly selective steroidal compound was the first of the new AIs to be used in clinical trials. It is a substrate analogue, administered as an i.m. injection every 2 weeks. It is effective in the treatment of ABC with an objective response rate (ORR) similar to tamoxifen and megestrol acetate (MA) and is generally well tolerated; rare instances of injection site reactions have been reported. Afema® (fadrozole HCl), a non-steroidal AI is active orally, and effectively suppresses estrogen levels in PMP women, but it is not completely selective for aromatase when administered at higher than therapeutic doses. At the therapeutic dose of 1 mg twice a day it has an anti-tumour efficacy similar to MA, a good tolerability and no clinically relevant effects on other hormones of the endocrine system. Letrozole is the fourth of our AIs in clinical development. It is a non-steroidal, achiral, orally active, potent and highly selective competitive AI. Clinical endocrine studies have shown that the dose of 0.5 mg a day is the lowest dose achieving maximum estrogen suppression. Over a wide dose range, a lack of clinically relevant effects on other hormones of the endocrine system has confirmed its high selectivity. In four phase Ib/IIa studies in PMP patients with ABC who failed previous therapy, letrozole produced ORRs of 9, 31, 33 and 36%. One phase IIb/III study has been completed and two others are ongoing, comparing two doses of letrozole with MA or AG to confirm the anti-tumour efficacy of letrozole in the treatment of ABC in PMP women after treatment with anti-estrogens. Preliminary results from the completed trial show that letrozole 2.5 mg is superior to 0.5 mg in terms of ORR, time to progression and time to treatment failure, and is superior to the standard dose of MA in terms of ORR and tolerability. Therefore letrozole 2.5 mg can be recommended as a first choice for the treatment of PMP patients with hormone receptor-positive or unknown ABC after anti-estrogen therapy.

Purpose: The present study evaluated and compared the efficacy of pegvisomant and octreotide in blocking the growth hormone (GH) axis in humans based on pharmacodynamic biomarkers associated with the GH axis. The study also evaluated the safety of pegvisomant given at high s.c. doses for 14 days. Experimental Design: Eighty healthy subjects were enrolled in five cohorts: cohorts 1 to 3, s.c. pegvisomant at 40, 60, or 80 mg once daily × 14 days (n = 18 per cohort); cohort 4, s.c. octreotide at 200 μg thrice daily × 14 days (n = 18); and cohort 5, untreated control (n = 8). Serial blood samples were collected to measure plasma concentrations of total insulin-like growth factor type I (IGF-I), free IGF-I, IGF-II, IGF-binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3), and GH in all subjects and serum pegvisomant concentrations in subjects of cohorts 1 to 3. All subjects receiving treatment were monitored for adverse events (AE). Results: After s.c. dosing of pegvisomant once daily for 14 days, the mean maximum suppression values of total IGF-I were 57%, 60%, and 62%, at 40, 60, and 80 mg dose levels, respectively. The maximum suppression was achieved ∼7 days after the last dose and was sustained for ∼21 days. Pegvisomant also led to a sustained reduction in free IGF-I, IGFBP-3, and IGF-II concentrations by up to 33%, 46%, and 35%, respectively, and an increase in GH levels. In comparison, octreotide resulted in a considerably weaker inhibition of total IGF-I and IGFBP-3 for a much shorter duration, and no inhibition of IGF-II. AEs in pegvisomant-treated subjects were generally either grade 1 or 2. The most frequent treatment-related AEs included injection site reactions, headache, and fatigue. Conclusions: Pegvisomant at well-tolerated s.c. doses was considerably more efficacious than octreotide in suppressing the GH axis, resulting in substantial and sustained inhibition of circulating IGF-I, IGF-II, and IGFBP-3 concentrations. These results provide evidence in favor of further testing the hypothesis that pegvisomant, through blocking the GH receptor–mediated signal transduction pathways, could be effective in treating tumors that may be GH, IGF-I, and/or IGF-II dependent, such as breast and colorectal cancer.

Purpose: This study was performed to determine the maximum tolerated dose, dose-limiting toxicities, and pharmacokinetics of brostallicin, a nonalkylating DNA minor groove binder and a synthetic derivative of distamycin A, given as a weekly i.v. infusion. Experimental Design: Using an accelerated dose escalation design, patients with advanced solid tumor malignancies were treated with brostallicin administered as a 10-min i.v. infusion on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle. The starting dose of brostallicin was 0.3 mg/m2/week. To study the pharmacokinetic behavior of brostallicin, serial blood samples were obtained before and after the first and last infusions during cycle 1, and in cycles 2 and 4 in a limited number of patients. Results: Fourteen patients received 32 complete cycles of brostallicin. Dose-limiting toxicity was febrile neutropenia and was observed in 3 of 5 patients treated at 4.8 mg/m2/week. The maximum tolerated dose and recommended Phase II dose was 2.4 mg/m2/week. The mean ± SD terminal half-life at the maximum tolerated dose was 4.6 ± 4.1 h. There was moderate distribution of brostallicin into tissues, and the clearance was ∼20% of the hepatic blood flow. The area under the concentration time curve0-∞ of brostallicin increased in a dose-linear fashion. No significant relationship was observed between any plasma pharmacokinetic parameter and clinical toxicities. There were no objective responses during the trial, but 5 patients had stable disease after two cycles of treatment. Conclusions: The dose-limiting toxicity of weekly brostallicin was neutropenia. Systemic exposure increases linearly with dose. The recommended dose for Phase II studies is 2.4 mg/m2 on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle.

Background Taxotere, a semisynthetic compound structurally related to taxol, has a broad spectrum of activity in murine transplantable tumors; in the B16 melanoma model, it caused a total log cell kill 2.5 times greater than that caused by taxol at equitoxic doses. Purpose We conducted a phase I study of Taxotere (a) to determine its qualitative and quantitative toxic effects and a starting dose for phase II trials, (b) to investigate its clinical pharmacology, and (c) to document its antitumor activity. Methods Taxotere was given as a 1-hour infusion at a starting dose of 1 mg/m2 per day for 5 consecutive days. The 5-day course of therapy was repeated every 21 days. Thirty-nine cancer patients with advanced disease were entered in the study; at least three patients were entered at each dose level. Initial dose escalations were planned at 100% increments until biologic activity was observed; subsequent escalations were planned at 50% increments until grade 2 toxicity (the National Cancer Institute's Common Toxicity Criteria) occurred and then at 25% increments until the maximum tolerated dose was established. Results Thirty-nine patients were entered in the study. Successive dose levels used were 1, 4, 8, 16, 12, and 14 mg/m2 per day. The dose-limiting toxic effects were granulocytopenia and concurrent mucositis. Grade 4 granulocytopenia associated with grade 3 mucositis developed in six of 12 patients treated at a dose of 16 mg/m2 per day, two of 10 treated at 12 mg/m2 per day, and two of eight treated at 14 mg/m2 per day. Because these toxic effects occurred concurrently, all patients so affected developed neutropenic fevers and required hospitalization. Neither cardiac nor neurologic toxic effects were noted. Anti-tumor activity was observed in six patients with ovarian cancer and in one with breast carcinoma. Although pharmacokinetic parameters were consistent between day 1 and day 5 for individual patients, considerable variation existed among those treated at the same dose level. A relationship was observed between the area under the curve for plasma concentration of drug x time (AUC) on day 1 and the percentage decrease in absolute granulocyte counts. Conclusion Granulocytopenia associated with oral mucositis is the dose-limiting toxicity of this schedule. We recommended a starting dose of 14 mg/m2 per day for phase II studies of this 5-day schedule. Dose modifications on days 2-5 based on the day-1 AUC may allow individualized dosing.

A considerable volume of animal pharmacologic data support the view that increased flux through the polyol pathway provides a unifying hypothesis for the major complications of diabetes. An extensive clinical program has been established to verify the extrapolation of the animal pharmacologic findings to man. Clinical data accumulated to date confirm the biochemical and electrophysiologic effects, and encouraging evidence of a drug effect in diabetic neuropathy and retinopathy has already been observed. In the large, controlled safety data base already available, the long-term clinical use of sorbinil is devoid of significant adverse effects in terms of both subjective side effects and laboratory parameters. The only clinically important adverse reaction reported to date has been a hypersensitivity reaction in the early weeks of therapy, which is similar to that seen with other hydantoins.

Extensive animal data now exist to indicate potential benefit of sorbinil in the treatment of the major complications of diabetes mellitus. A clinical programme has been constructed to explore this therapeutic potential and encouraging evidence of drug effect has already been observed in patients with neuropathy and retinopathy. Two small preliminary studies in patients with painful neuropathy have shown that clinically significant reduction of pain was more frequently achieved with sorbinil than with placebo. A 6-month study of patients with retinopathy, using vitreous fluorophotometry as the criterion of retinal damage, showed significant (p = 0.03) benefit for the sorbinil group compared with the placebo group. Drug evaluation in these areas is complex and difficult but it is anticipated that the accumulation of additional data will further substantiate the efficacy suggested by these early findings. The only clinically important adverse effect of sorbinil is the hypersensitivity reaction. This usually occurs during the initial weeks of therapy and is similar to that seen with phenytoin. The long term use of sorbinil is without significant adverse effects.

A phase II double-blind placebo-controlled, randomized dose-ranging trial was undertaken to determine the antiemetic efficacy and toxicity of the synthetic cannabinoid levonantradol at doses of 0.5, 1.0, 1.5, and 2.0 mg. Intramuscular levonantradol was prophylactically administered in random dosing to 20 subjects with a documented history of refractory emesis due to chemotherapy in advanced cancer. The selected dose was administered prior to the chemotherapy and was serially repeated over 12 hours, and efficacy and toxicity data were evaluated for 24 hours. Significant (P less than 0.01) antiemetic activity over placebo was observed with all doses of levonantradol administered, and a dose-effect response was not observed. Doses up to 2.0 mg were well tolerated, and observed toxicity increased with increased doses and with repeated dosing. Psychomimetic effects were mild and tolerable, and the limiting side effects were somnolence and hypotension.