Search

BACKGROUND: The annual number of parental karyotypes in cases of repeated miscarriage is increasing gradually in The Netherlands. The efficiency of offering parental karyotyping in couples with repeated miscarriage has not been evaluated before, especially not for the group with miscarriages at advanced maternal age. METHODS: A historical cohort study and nested case–control study were conducted, including couples with at least two miscarriages. Data were retrieved from medical records and telephone interviews. The obstetric follow‐up was recorded for ≥2 years after the parental chromosome analysis. Data were analysed to compare ratios of carrier/non‐carrier couples in whom maternal age was ≥36 or <36 years at the second, third or fourth and more miscarriage. A projected prevalence of carrier status of a structural chromosome abnormality was calculated by extrapolating the number of included patients to the original level of the total screening population. RESULTS: Forty‐one couples with carrier status of a structural chromosome abnormality and 74 couples without carrier status were included. No unbalanced offspring arose after the detection of a structural chromosome abnormality. The risk of being a carrier was not significantly lower (as might be expected) when women were ≥36 years. Ascertainment after two, three, or four and more miscarriages did not change these findings. CONCLUSIONS: Karyotyping of 1324 couples ascertained for repeated miscarriage did not yield an unbalanced fetal chromosome pattern after the ascertainment of parental carrier status. In women with advanced maternal age, the frequency of carrier status was not lower than in younger women. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The ProTWIN Trial (NTR1858) showed that, in women with a multiple pregnancy and a cervical length < 25(th) percentile (38 mm), prophylactic use of a cervical pessary reduced the risk of adverse perinatal outcome. We investigated whether other maternal or pregnancy characteristics collected at baseline can improve identification of women most likely to benefit from pessary placement., Methods: ProTWIN is a multicenter randomized trial in which 808 women with a multiple pregnancy were assigned to pessary or control. Using these data we developed a multivariable logistic model comprising treatment, cervical length, chorionicity, pregnancy history and number of fetuses, and the interaction of these variables with treatment as predictors of adverse perinatal outcome., Results: Short cervix, monochorionicity and nulliparity were predictive factors for a benefit from pessary insertion. History of previous preterm birth and triplet pregnancy were predictive factors of possible harm from pessary. The model identified 35% of women as benefiting (95% CI, 32-39%), which is 10% more than using cervical length only (25%) for pessary decisions. The model had acceptable calibration. We estimated that using the model to guide the choice of pessary placement would reduce the risk of adverse perinatal outcome significantly from 13.5% when no pessary is inserted to 8.1% (absolute risk reduction, 5.4% (95% CI, 2.1-8.6%))., Conclusions: We developed and internally validated a multivariable treatment selection model, with cervical length, chorionicity, pregnancy history and number of fetuses. If externally validated, it could be used to identify women with a twin pregnancy who would benefit from a pessary, and lead to a reduction in adverse perinatal outcomes in these women. Copyright © 2016 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd., (Copyright © 2016 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Objective: To investigate whether vaginal Group B Streptococcus (GBS) colonisation or other baseline characteristics of women with preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) can help in identifying subgroups of women who would benefit from immediate delivery., Design: Secondary analysis of the PPROMEXIL trials., Setting: Sixty hospitals in the Netherlands., Population: Women with PPROM between 34 and 37 weeks of gestation., Methods: Random assignment of 723 women to immediate delivery or expectant management., Main Outcome Measures: Early onset neonatal sepsis., Results: Vaginal GBS colonisation status was the only marker which was significantly associated with the benefit of immediate delivery (P for interaction: 0.04). GBS colonisation was observed in 14% of women. The risk of early onset neonatal sepsis in GBS-positive women was high (15.2%) when they were managed expectantly but this risk was reduced to 1.8% with immediate delivery. The early onset neonatal sepsis risk was much lower in neonates of GBS-negative women: 2.6% after expectant management and 2.9% with immediate delivery. We estimated that by inducing labour only in GBS-positive women, there would be a 10.4% increase in term delivery rate, while keeping neonatal sepsis and caesarean delivery rates comparable to a strategy of labour induction for all., Conclusions: Our post hoc findings suggest that women with PROM between 34 and 37 weeks might benefit from immediate delivery if they have GBS vaginal colonisation, while in GBS-negative women labour induction could be delayed until 37 weeks., (© 2014 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.)

Objective: To externally validate two models from the USA (entry-to-care [ETC] and close-to-delivery [CTD]) that predict successful intended vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) for the Dutch population., Design: A nationwide registration-based cohort study., Setting: Seventeen hospitals in the Netherlands., Population: Seven hundred and sixty-three pregnant women, each with one previous caesarean section and a viable singleton cephalic pregnancy without a contraindication for an intended VBAC., Methods: The ETC model comprises the variables maternal age, prepregnancy body mass index (BMI), ethnicity, previous vaginal delivery, previous VBAC and previous nonprogressive labour. The CTD model replaces prepregnancy BMI with third-trimester BMI and adds estimated gestational age at delivery, hypertensive disease of pregnancy, cervical examination and induction of labour. We included consecutive medical records of eligible women who delivered in 2010. For validation, individual probabilities of women who had an intended VBAC were calculated., Main Outcome Measures: Discriminative performance was assessed with the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic and predictive performance was assessed with calibration plots and the Hosmer-Lemeshow (H-L) statistic., Results: Five hundred and fifteen (67%) of the 763 women had an intended VBAC; 72% of these (371) had an actual VBAC. The AUCs of the ETC and CTD models were 68% (95% CI 63-72%) and 72% (95% CI 67-76%), respectively. The H-L statistic showed a P-value of 0.167 for the ETC model and P = 0.356 for the CTD model, indicating no lack of fit., Conclusion: External validation of two predictive models developed in the USA revealed an adequate performance within the Dutch population., (© 2014 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.)

Objective: To develop and internally validate a model that predicts the outcome of an intended vaginal birth after caesarean (VBAC) for a Western European population that can be used to personalise counselling for deliveries at term., Design: Registration-based retrospective cohort study., Setting: Five university teaching hospitals, seven non-university teaching hospitals, and five non-university non-teaching hospitals in the Netherlands., Population: A cohort of 515 women with a history of one caesarean section and a viable singleton pregnancy, without a contraindication for intended VBAC, who delivered at term., Methods: Potential predictors for a vaginal delivery after caesarean section were chosen based on literature and expert opinions. We internally validated the prediction model using bootstrapping techniques., Main Outcome Measures: Predictors for VBAC. For model validation, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for discriminative capacity and calibration-per-risk-quantile for accuracy were calculated., Results: A total of 371 out of 515 women had a VBAC (72%). Variables included in the model were: estimated fetal weight greater than the 90(th) percentile in the third trimester; previous non-progressive labour; previous vaginal delivery; induction of labour; pre-pregnancy body mass index; and ethnicity. The AUC was 71% (95% confidence interval, 95% CI = 69-73%), indicating a good discriminative ability. The calibration plot shows that the predicted probabilities are well calibrated, especially from 65% up, which accounts for 77% of the total study population., Conclusion: We developed an appropriate Western European population-based prediction model that is aimed to personalise counselling for term deliveries., (© 2013 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.)

Background: Little is known on the actual diagnostic and therapeutic management of recurrent miscarriage and the impact of introducing guidelines on this topic. The objective of this study was to evaluate any changes in the management of recurrent miscarriage among Dutch gynaecologists after the introduction of the Dutch guideline 'Recurrent Miscarriage' in 1999., Methods: Questionnaires were sent to all practices for obstetrics and gynaecology in the Netherlands. Data concerned definition, diagnosis and treatment of recurrent miscarriage. Results were compared with a similar study conducted before the introduction of the guideline and with the recommendations in the guideline., Results: The response rate was 83%. Regarding gestational age, only 3% of the respondents used the definition as advised in the guideline. After the introduction of the guideline, thrombophilia factors were tested more frequently, anticoagulants were prescribed more frequently and more respondents reported to correct uterine malformations. Therapies not described in the guideline, e.g. donor insemination and oocyte donation, were still applied., Conclusions: The adherence to the Dutch guideline 'Recurrent Miscarriage' was rather poor, presumably due to guideline-related as well as physician-related barriers. Too many diagnostic tests and ineffective therapeutic interventions were performed. This study demonstrates the importance of appropriate implementation and revision.

Objective: To identify additional risk factors and the corresponding probability of carrying a chromosome abnormality in couples with two or more miscarriages., Design: Nested case-control study., Method: In 6 centres for clinical genetics in the Netherlands, data were collected from couples referred for karyotyping after 2 2 miscarriages from 1992-2000. Factors influencing the probability of carrier status were examined. The corresponding probability of carrier status was calculated for the various combinations of these factors., Results: In total 279 carrier couples and 428 non-carrier couples were included. 4 independent factors influencing the probability of carrier status were identified: a younger maternal age at the time of second miscarriage, a history of > or = 3 miscarriages, a history of > 2 miscarriages in a brother or sister of either partner, and a history of> 2 miscarriages in parents of either partner. The calculated probability of carrier status in couples referred for chromosome analysis after two or more miscarriages, varied between 0.5-10.2%. In 18% of couples included, the risk was found to be so low (< 2.2%), that in couples with comparable risk factors, it may not be necessary to perform karyotyping., Conclusion: This study demonstrated that the probability of carrier status in couples with > or = 2 miscarriages is modified by additional factors. Selective chromosome analysis would result in a more effective referral policy and therefore decrease the number of chromosome analyses and lower the costs.