Search

Cutaneous melanoma, a type of skin tumor originating from melanocytes, often develops from premalignant naevoid lesions via a gradual transformation process driven by an accumulation of (epi)genetic lesions. These dysplastic naevi display altered morphology and often proliferation of melanocytes. Additionally, melanocytes in dysplastic naevi show structural mitochondrial and melanosomal alterations and have elevated reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels. For this study we performed genome-wide expression and proteomic analysis of melanocytes from dysplastic naevus (DNMC) and adjacent normal skin (MC) from 18 patients. Whole genome expression profiles of the DNMC and MC of each individual patient subjected to GO-based comparative statistical analysis yielded significantly differentially expressed GO classes including “organellar ribosome,” “mitochondrial ribosome,” “hydrogen ion transporter activity,” and “prefoldin complex.” Validation of 5 genes from these top GO classes revealed a heterogeneous differential expression pattern. Proteomic analysis demonstrated differentially expressed proteins in DNMC that are involved in cellular metabolism, detoxification, and cytoskeletal organization processes, such as GTP-binding Rho-like protein CDC42, glutathione-S-transferase omega-1 and prolyl 4-hydroxylase. Collectively these results point to deregulation of cellular processes, such as metabolism and protein synthesis, consistent with the observed elevated oxidative stress levels in DNMC potentially resulting in oxidative DNA damage in these cells.

We report a genome-wide association study for melanoma that was conducted by the GenoMEL Consortium. Our discovery phase included 2,981 individuals with melanoma and 1,982 study-specific control individuals of European ancestry, as well as an additional 6,426 control subjects from French or British populations, all of whom were genotyped for 317,000 or 610,000 single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Our analysis replicated previously known melanoma susceptibility loci. Seven new regions with at least one SNP with P < 10(-5) and further local imputed or genotyped support were selected for replication using two other genome-wide studies (from Australia and Texas, USA). Additional replication came from case-control series from the UK and The Netherlands. Variants at three of the seven loci replicated at P < 10(-3): an SNP in ATM (rs1801516, overall P = 3.4 × 10(-9)), an SNP in MX2 (rs45430, P = 2.9 × 10(-9)) and an SNP adjacent to CASP8 (rs13016963, P = 8.6 × 10(-10)). A fourth locus near CCND1 remains of potential interest, showing suggestive but inconclusive evidence of replication (rs1485993, overall P = 4.6 × 10(-7) under a fixed-effects model and P = 1.2 × 10(-3) under a random-effects model). These newly associated variants showed no association with nevus or pigmentation phenotypes in a large British case-control series.

We report a genome-wide association study of melanoma conducted by the GenoMEL consortium based on 317K tagging SNPs for 1,650 selected cases and 4,336 controls, with replication in an additional two cohorts (1,149 selected cases and 964 controls from GenoMEL, and a population-based case-control study in Leeds of 1,163 cases and 903 controls). The genome-wide screen identified five loci with genotyped or imputed SNPs reaching P < 5 x 10(-7). Three of these loci were replicated: 16q24 encompassing MC1R (combined P = 2.54 x 10(-27) for rs258322), 11q14-q21 encompassing TYR (P = 2.41 x 10(-14) for rs1393350) and 9p21 adjacent to MTAP and flanking CDKN2A (P = 4.03 x 10(-7) for rs7023329). MC1R and TYR are associated with pigmentation, freckling and cutaneous sun sensitivity, well-recognized melanoma risk factors. Common variants within the 9p21 locus have not previously been associated with melanoma. Despite wide variation in allele frequency, these genetic variants show notable homogeneity of effect across populations of European ancestry living at different latitudes and show independent association to disease risk.

Dysplastic naevi (DN) are a known risk factor for malignant melanoma. Their occurrence is closely connected with the degree of skin pigmentation. People with a light complexion are more likely to develop DN than dark-skinned individuals. We examined the proposition that DN exhibit altered melanin formation, which may be involved in their malignant transformation. X-ray microanalysis was used to study the composition of melanosomes from DN and to compare the results with those obtained from melanomas, banal (dermal) naevi and normal cutaneous melanocytes. We analysed sulphur (an indicator of phaeomelanin) and two metals, iron and calcium, involved in oxidative stress. FACS analysis of dihydrorhodamine-123-labelled cells was employed to quantify differences in the production of radical oxygen species in DN cells and normal skin melanocytes. A significantly higher sulphur content was found in melanosomes from DN cells and melanoma cells when compared with normal melanocytes and naevus cells from banal naevi. In addition, melanosomes of DN cells and melanoma cells contained higher amounts of iron and calcium. In the case of calcium, this was associated with a significantly elevated cytoplasmic concentration. FACS analysis showed that DN cells exhibited higher concentrations of radical oxygen species than normal skin melanocytes from the same individuals. We propose that increased phaeomelanogenesis in DN cells is connected with oxidative imbalance, which is reflected by increased intracellular concentrations of reactive oxygen species and raised calcium and iron concentrations. We show that the metabolic alterations in DN cells resemble those found in melanoma cells. Our findings provide support for the idea that DN cells are true precursor lesions of melanoma.

Cutaneous melanoma continues to increase in incidence in many countries, and intentional tanning is a risk factor for melanoma. The aim of this study was to understand how melanoma risk factors, perceived threat and preferences for a suntan relate to intentional tanning. Self-report data were collected on behalf of GenoMEL (www.genomel.org) from the general population using an online survey. A total of 8178 individuals completed the survey, with 72.8% of respondents being from Europe, 12.1% from Australia, 7.1% from the US, 2.5% from Israel and 5.5% from other countries. Seven percent of respondents had previously been diagnosed with melanoma and 8% had at least one first-degree relative with a previous melanoma. Overall, 70% reported some degree of intentional tanning during the past year, and 38% of respondents previously diagnosed with melanoma had intentionally tanned. The total number of risk factors was positively correlated with perceived risk of melanoma [correlation coefficient (rho) = 0.27], and negatively correlated with intentional tanning (rho = -0.16). Preference for a dark suntan was the strongest predictor of intentional tanning [regression coefficient (beta)= 0.35, P

Purpose: We report the largest study to date analyzing the risk of cancers other than melanoma in melanoma families positive for the same CDKN2A mutation. Experimental Design: We studied family members of 22 families positive for the p16-Leiden founder mutation who had attended a surveillance clinic or were their close relatives. Within this cohort, observed and expected rates of cancer were computed by mutation status consisting of 221 (proven plus obligate) carriers, 639 (proven plus obligate) noncarriers, and 668 first-degree relatives whose carrier risk was estimated from the relationship to known carriers and the age and melanoma status of that person and their relatives. Results: Our analysis shows a relative risk (RR) of cancer other than melanoma and nonmelanoma skin cancer of 4.4 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 3.3-5.6], predominantly attributable to the increased risk for pancreatic cancer (RR, 46.6; 95% CI, 24.7-76.4), but also for other cancers. We provide substantial proof for pancreatic cancer being a key component of the p16-Leiden phenotype. Inclusion of this cancer in a penetrance analysis leads to an estimated RR of pancreatic cancer for mutation carriers of 47.8 (95% CI, 28.4-74.7). Conclusions: This study shows clear evidence of increased risk of cancers other than melanoma in CDKN2A families carrying the p16-Leiden mutation. Further research is necessary to determine if similar risks apply to families with CDKN2A mutations other than p16-Leiden.

GenoMEL, comprising major familial melanoma research groups from North America, Europe, Asia, and Australia has created the largest familial melanoma sample yet available to characterize mutations in the high-risk melanoma susceptibility genes CDKN2A/alternate reading frames (ARF), which encodes p16 and p14ARF, and CDK4 and to evaluate their relationship with pancreatic cancer (PC), neural system tumors (NST), and uveal melanoma (UM). This study included 466 families (2,137 patients) with at least three melanoma patients from 17 GenoMEL centers. Overall, 41% (n = 190) of families had mutations; most involved p16 (n = 178). Mutations in CDK4 (n = 5) and ARF (n = 7) occurred at similar frequencies (2-3%). There were striking differences in mutations across geographic locales. The proportion of families with the most frequent founder mutation(s) of each locale differed significantly across the seven regions (P = 0.0009). Single founder CDKN2A mutations were predominant in Sweden (p.R112_L113insR, 92% of family's mutations) and the Netherlands (c.225_243del19, 90% of family's mutations). France, Spain, and Italy had the same most frequent mutation (p.G101W). Similarly, Australia and United Kingdom had the same most common mutations (p.M53I, c.IVS2-105A>G, p.R24P, and p.L32P). As reported previously, there was a strong association between PC and CDKN2A mutations (P < 0.0001). This relationship differed by mutation. In contrast, there was little evidence for an association between CDKN2A mutations and NST (P = 0.52) or UM (P = 0.25). There was a marginally significant association between NST and ARF (P = 0.05). However, this particular evaluation had low power and requires confirmation. This GenoMEL study provides the most extensive characterization of mutations in high-risk melanoma susceptibility genes in families with three or more melanoma patients yet available. (Cancer Res 2006; 66(20): 9818-28)

Prognosis in patients with uveal melanoma is poor as approximately half of all tumors metastasize and currently there are no effective treatments for disseminated disease. Differences in invasiveness between uveal melanomas could therefore be of major significance regarding clinical outcome. To identify genes associated with invasive potential, we have used microarray expression profiling combined with phenotypic characterization of uveal melanoma and melanocyte cell lines to define a gene signature associated with cellular invasion. A panel of 14 uveal cell cultures was assessed using three assays of invasiveness: matrigel invasion chamber system, scratch wound closure and cell motility. We identified a set of 853 differentially expressed transcripts (Wilcoxon–Mann–Whitney test, P

Up to 10% of all melanoma patients show a family history of disease. One main predisposing gene for familial melanoma development is CDKN2A, a tumor suppressor gene that encodes two distinct proteins, p16INK4A and p14ARF. CDKN2A germline mutations have been found in 20-40% of melanoma-prone families. So far, BRAF and NRAS are the most frequently altered oncogenes described in cutaneous melanoma. To date, little is known about the somatic changes that occur in familial melanoma. The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of BRAF and NRAS somatic mutations in familial melanomas and to evaluate the associations between these mutations and clinicopathological factors. The study was performed as a collaboration within GenoMEL (The Melanoma Genetics Consortium). A total of 135 primary familial cutaneous melanomas (88 tumors from CDKN2A mutation-carriers and 47 from CDKN2A non-carriers) were investigated. Paraffin-blocks of tumors were collected from 8 GenoMEL centers in Australia, Italy, Latvia, the Netherlands, Spain, Sweden, and UK. Tumor cells were isolated by laser capture microdissection and mutation screening (BRAF exon 15 and NRAS exon 3) was performed by direct sequencing. Mutation analysis revealed BRAF and NRAS mutations in 41.6% and 11.4% of tumors, respectively. In no case were BRAF and NRAS mutations found to coexist in the same tumor. There was no difference in BRAF mutation frequency between tumors from patients with CDKN2A alterations and tumors from patients wild-type for CDKN2A (41.0% vs. 42.9%). Similarly, the frequency of NRAS mutations did not differ markedly when tumors from CDKN2A mutation-carriers and non-carriers were compared (9.0% vs. 15.6%). There was also no difference in the frequency of BRAF mutations between tumors with CDKN2A mutations disrupting both p16INK4A and p14ARF and tumors with CDKN2A mutations affecting p16INK4A only (40.6% vs. 36.4%). When tumors with different CDKN2A founder mutations were compared, BRAF mutations were seen in 50.0%, 45.8%, 37.5% and 35.0% of p.M53I, p.R112_L113insR, p.G101W and c.225_243del19 altered tumors, respectively. NRAS mutations were observed in 14.3% 12.5% and 10.5% of p.R112_L113insR, p.M53I and c.225_243del19 altered tumors, respectively, whereas no NRAS mutations were seen in tumors with the p.G101W founder mutation. Patients with BRAF-mutated tumors had a significantly lower median age at diagnosis compared to patients with NRAS-mutated or BRAF/NRAS wild-type tumors (43.5, 54 and 51.5 years, respectively). Moreover, melanomas with mutated BRAF or NRAS were thicker than BRAF/NRAS wild-type cases (median thickness 1.0, 1.4 and 0.7mm, respectively). Our results suggest a role for the BRAF and NRAS oncogenes in familial melanoma. Somatic changes of these genes occur in tumors from both CDKN2A mutation carriers and non-carriers. Presence of BRAF or NRAS mutations associated with patient and tumor characteristics. Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 867. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-867