Search

Background: There is only sparse knowledge on the psychological burden of patients who have periprosthetic joint infections. The aim of our study was to assess the need for psychological support following total joint arthroplasty of the hip and knee. A special focus was set on patients who had aseptic and septic complications., Methods: A total of 13,976 patients who underwent total hip (n = 6,926) or total knee arthroplasty (n = 7,050) between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2019 at a single institution were retrospectively evaluated for the postoperative need for a psychological consultation. Data were collected on age, sex, type of surgery, and indications for revision procedures. The need for a psychological consultation was assessed during the daily postoperative visits, which were further coordinated by 2 institutional psychologists., Results: The average age was 68 years (range, 12 to 100), and there were 63.5% women. The overall rate of psychological consultations was 1.7%. Patients who had a septic indication for revision surgery had an 18.7-fold higher rate of postoperative psychological consultations compared to patients following primary surgery and a 5.4-fold higher rate compared to patients who had an aseptic indication. In detail, this rate was 1.0% in the primary subgroup, compared to 7.7% following revision arthroplasty (P < .001). In the revision subgroup, the rate was 17.9% for septic and 3.3% for aseptic revision arthroplasty cases (P < .001). Postoperative psychological consultations were twice as frequent in women (2.1%) compared to men (1.0%), P < .001., Conclusions: The present study raises awareness of the markedly high psychological burden in revision arthroplasty cases, in the view of the high estimated number of unknown cases. There is a significant correlation between periprosthetic joint infectionsand the postoperative need for a psychological consultation, with women being at an even higher risk. Health care providers should aim at offering psychological support for patients who have a septic complication, with affected patients being at risk for psychological stress., Level of Evidence: IV., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence, microbiological spectrum, risk factors, and clinical outcomes of unexpected-positive-intraoperative-cultures (UPIC) in presumed aseptic and unclear revision-total-hip-/knee-arthroplasties (rTHA and rTKA) compared to culture-negative (CN) revisions., Methods: This study reviewed all International-consensus-meeting-2018 (ICM 2018) negative or inconclusive rTHA (n = 751) and rTKA (n = 679) performed at our institution from 2011 to 2020 with a minimum follow-up of two years. A Kaplan-Meier-analysis was performed to determine the septic and aseptic-free implant survival in cases with UPIC's and matched culture-negative cases. Patient demographics, risk factors, microbiological spectrum and clinical outcomes were evaluated., Results: There were significantly more UPIC cases in rTHA 196/751 (26.1 %) compared to rTKA 113/679 (16.6 %); (p < 0.001). UPICs in rTKA and rTHA have a lower septic and aseptic implant-free-survival compared to CN revisions. Patients with a history of nickel allergy have a higher risk of an UPIC in rTHA and rTKA (p < 0.001). Septic re-revisions after UPIC had a significantly (H: p = 0.004; K: p = 0.030) shorter time period to the primary/previous surgery (H: 84 (IQR:41-797); K: 115 (IQR:55-446)) compared to patients with aseptic re-revisions after UPIC (H:1248 (IQR:178-3534); K: 827 (IQR:361-1183))., Conclusion: UPICs have a higher rate of septic and aseptic failure than CN outcomes. UPICs are twice as common in rTHA compared to rTKA. Preoperative PJI workup reduces the UPIC rate. Nickel allergy is a risk factor for UPIC. Early revisions with UPICs after primary THA or TKA have a higher risk of septic failure., The Translational Potential of This Article: This article provides new information on revision rates for UPIC and potential risk factors for UPIC and its treatment failure., Competing Interests: None., (© 2024 The Author(s).)

Aims: This study aimed to evaluate the BioFire Joint Infection (JI) Panel in cases of hip and knee periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) where conventional microbiology is unclear, and to assess its role as a complementary intraoperative diagnostic tool., Methods: Five groups representing common microbiological scenarios in hip and knee revision arthroplasty were selected from our arthroplasty registry, prospectively maintained PJI databases, and biobank: 1) unexpected-negative cultures (UNCs), 2) unexpected-positive cultures (UPCs), 3) single-positive intraoperative cultures (SPCs), and 4) clearly septic and 5) aseptic cases. In total, 268 archived synovial fluid samples from 195 patients who underwent acute/chronic revision total hip or knee arthroplasty were included. Cases were classified according to the International Consensus Meeting 2018 criteria. JI panel evaluation of synovial fluid was performed, and the results were compared with cultures., Results: The JI panel detected microorganisms in 7/48 (14.5%) and 15/67 (22.4%) cases related to UNCs and SPCs, respectively, but not in cases of UPCs. The correlation between JI panel detection and infection classification criteria for early/late acute and chronic PJI was 46.6%, 73%, and 40%, respectively. Overall, the JI panel identified 12.6% additional microorganisms and three new species. The JI panel pathogen identification showed a sensitivity and specificity of 41.4% (95% confidence interval (CI) 33.7 to 49.5) and 91.1% (95% CI 84.7 to 94.9), respectively. In total, 19/195 (9.7%) could have been managed differently and more accurately upon JI panel evaluation., Conclusion: Despite its microbial limitation, JI panel demonstrated clinical usefulness by complementing the traditional methods based on multiple cultures, particularly in PJI with unclear microbiological results., Competing Interests: S. Gardete Hartmann reports financial support from BioFire Diagnostics, bioMérieux for attendance with oral presentation and poster presentation at 40th Annual Meeting of the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS), and the Interdisciplinary Course on Antibiotics and Resistance (ICARe) 2022, respectively. J. G. Hofstaetter and S. Gardete Hartmann report payment for expert testimonial by BioFire Diagnostics, bioMérieux, unrelated to this study. The remaining co-authors report no conflict of interest., (© 2024 Gardete-Hartmann et al.)

Background: Data regarding the diagnostic value of ultrasound (US)-determined fluid film and joint aspiration prior to revision total hip arthroplasty for suspected periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) are limited. This study aimed to analyze the value of US-determined fluid film, characterized the preoperative and intraoperative microbiological spectrum and resistance patterns, and compared the concordance between preoperative synovial fluid and intraoperative culture results., Methods: We analyzed 366 US examinations from 324 patients prior to revision total hip arthroplasty. Selected cases were grouped into clearly infected, noninfected, and inconclusive cohorts, according to the International Consensus Meeting 2018 Criteria. For US-determined fluid film <1 mm, no aspiration was performed based on our institutional protocol. Patients were grouped into no aspiration (144 of 366; [39.3%]), dry tap (21 of 366; [5.7%]), and a successful tap (201 of 366; [54.9%]). The microbiological spectrum and antibiograms were compared between preoperative and intraoperative results., Results: The absence of US-determined fluid film showed no correlation with the presence of a hip PJI. Overall, 31.9% cases of the no-aspiration group had a PJI. In total, 13.5% discrepancies were found between successful taps and intraoperative cultures. The most prevalent microorganisms in preoperative synovial fluid were Staphylococcus epidermidis and Staphylococcus aureus (20.8%), while intraoperatively S. epidermidis (26.3%) and Cutibacterium acnes (14.5%) were leading. Additional microorganisms were identified in 32.5% of intraoperative cultures. There were no differences between resistance patterns of preoperative and intraoperative concordant microorganisms., Conclusions: Absence of US-determined fluid film cannot rule out the presence of a hip PJI. Combined microbiological results from hip US aspirations and subsequent surgical procedures are crucial to design an effective treatment for suspected hip PJI., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background Context: In severe cases of postoperative spinal implant infections (PSII) multiple revision surgeries may be needed. Little is known if changes in the microbiological spectrum and antibiotic resistance pattern occur between revision surgeries., Purpose: Analysis of the microbiological spectrum and antibiotic resistance pattern in patients with multiple revision surgeries for the treatment of PSII STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective database analysis., Patient Sample: Between 01/2011 and 12/2018, 103 patients underwent 248 revision surgeries for the treatment of PSII. Twenty patients (19.4%) who underwent multiple revision surgeries for PSII were included in this study., Outcome Measures: Microbiological spectrum, antibiotic resistance pattern., Methods: A retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained single center spine infection database was performed with a minimum follow-up of 3 years. Overall, 20 patients (six male/14 female) underwent 82 revisions for PSII (median 3; range 2-12). There were 55 of 82 (67.1%) procedures with a positive microbiological result. Microbiological analysis was performed on tissue and implant sonication fluid. Changes in microbial spectrum and antibiotic resistance pattern between surgeries were evaluated using Chi-Square and Fisher's exact test., Results: In total, 74 microorganisms (83.3% gram-positive; 10.8% gram-negative) were identified. The most common microorganisms were Staphylococcus epidermidis (18.9%) and Cutibacterium acnes (18.9%). All S. epidermidis identified were methicillin-resistant (MRSE). Overall, there were 15 of 55 (27.3%) polymicrobial infections. The microbiological spectrum changed in 57.1% (20/35) between the revision stages over the entire PSII period. In 42.9% (15/35) the microorganism persisted between the revision surgeries stages. Overall, changes of the antibiotic resistance pattern were seen in 17.4% (8/46) of the detected microorganisms, comparing index revision and all subsequent re-revisions. Moreover, higher resistance rates were found for moxifloxacin and for ciprofloxacin at first re-revision surgery compared with index PSII revision. Resistances against vancomycin increased from 4.5% (1/23) at index PSII revision to 7.7% (2/26) at first re-revision surgery., Conclusions: Changes of the microbiological spectrum and the resistance pattern can occur in patients with severe PSII who require multiple revision surgeries. It is important to consider these findings in the antimicrobial treatment of PSII. The microbiological analysis of intraoperative tissue samples should be performed at every revision procedure for PSII., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declared that there are no conflicts of interest. There was no financial support for this study., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Resection arthroplasty can be performed as the first stage of a two-stage procedure in some patients with severe periprosthetic hip joint infections with poor bone stock. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate factors associated with the subsequent failure or success of these patients. Between 2011 and 2020; in 61 (26.4%) of 231 patients who underwent a two-stage protocol of periprosthetic hip joint infections; no spacer was used in the first stage. The minimum follow-up period was 12 months. Patient's demographics and various infection risk factors were analyzed. In total, 37/61 (60.7%) patients underwent a successful reimplantation, and four patients died within the follow-up period. Patients within the failure group had a significantly higher Charlson comorbidity index ( p = 0.002); number of operations prior to resection arthroplasty ( p = 0.022) and were older ( p = 0.018). Failure was also associated with the presence of a positive culture in the first- and second-stage procedures ( p = 0.012). Additional risk factors were persistent high postoperative CRP values and the requirement of a negative-pressure wound therapy ( p ≤ 0.05). In conclusion, multiple factors need to be evaluated when trying to predict the outcome of patients undergoing resection arthroplasty as the first stage of a two-stage procedure in patients with challenging periprosthetic hip joint infections.

Background: A positive microbiological result at reimplantation may lead to a failed 2-stage revision arthroplasty in the treatment of periprosthetic joint infections. Little is known about changes in microbiological spectrum and resistance pattern between culture positive first and second stage procedures in revision knee and hip arthroplasty., Methods: Between January 2011 and December 2019, we performed 327 two-stage revision arthroplasties on 312 patients. There were 37 of 312 (11.9%) patients (20 hips/17 knees) who had a positive microbiological culture during the first and second stage procedure. We analyzed the microbiological spectrum, antimicrobial resistance pattern, and clinical outcome of culture positive first and second stage procedures as well as subsequent re-revisions., Results: Re-revision was necessary in 40.5% (15/37) of patients with culture positive first and second stage procedure at a median follow-up of 3.5 years. We found microbiological changes in 83.8% (31/37) of patients between the first and second stage and in 88.9% (8/9) between the second stage and subsequent culture positive re-revision. Polymicrobial infections were found in 21.6% (8/37) of first and in 16.2% (6/37) of second stage procedures. In 27% (10/37) of patients, microorganisms persisted between the first and second stage procedure. The antimicrobial resistance pattern changed in 60% of persistent microorganisms between the first and second stage procedure., Conclusion: Changes in microbiological spectrum and resistance pattern are common between culture positive first and second stage procedures as well as subsequent re-revisions. This has to be considered in the antimicrobial treatment of periprosthetic joint infections., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The aim of this study was to evaluate the number of primary and revision total joint arthroplasties (TJA/rTJA) in 2020 compared to 2019. Specifically, the first and the second waves of the COVID-19 pandemic were evaluated as well as the pre-operative COVID-19 test. A cross-sectional single-center study of our prospectively maintained institutional arthroplasty registry was performed. The first COVID-19 wave and the second COVID-19 wave led to a socioeconomic lockdown in 2020. Performed surgeries, cause of revision, age, gender, and American Society of Anesthesiologists-level were analyzed. Preoperative COVID-19 testing was evaluated and nationwide COVID-19 data were compared to other countries. In 2020, there was a decrease by 16.2% in primary and revision TJAs of the hip and knee compared to 2019. We observed a reduction of 15.8% in primary TJAs and a reduction of 18.6% on rTJAs in 2020 compared to 2019. There is an incline in total hip arthroplasties (THAs) and a decline in total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) comparing 2019 to 2020. During the first wave, there was a reduction in performed primary TJAs of 86%. During the second wave, no changes were observed. This is the first study quantifying the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on primary and revision TJAs regarding the first and second wave.