Search

Objective The purpose of this cross-sectional study was to evaluate multiple indices of wellbeing in healthcare professionals during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods Healthcare professionals were invited to participate across the University Hospitals healthcare system in Ohio, USA. Participants (N = 6397) completed online questionnaires on their wellbeing, including healthy behaviors, safety and security, mental and physical health concerns, and social support. Differences in wellbeing across demographics were also assessed. Results Overall, healthcare professionals’ mean subjective wellbeing was 7.98 (1.50) and their future health score was 3.98 (1.13). Room for improvement was noted for diet, sleep, and positive thinking. Males reported significantly higher levels of overall wellbeing and future health scores, including fruit and vegetable intake and physical activity, and alcohol use, whereas females reported higher levels of positive thinking and tobacco use. Of the three largest racial groups, White and Asian employees scored significantly higher on future health, M = 4.00 (1.17) and M = 4.10 (1.13), than Black or African American employees, M = 3.74 (1.10). Conclusions This cross-sectional study assessed the wellbeing of healthcare workers during the initial peak of the COVID-19 pandemic prior to vaccine delivery. Future work will implement strategies to improve healthcare workers’ wellbeing in an individualized way based on our findings, as well as evaluate changes in wellbeing and future health scores across time.

248 Background: Although cancer patients frequently use CAM, it is uncertain how oncologists’ spirituality and religiosity impact their decisions to use or recommend CAM with their patients. Methods: A US probability sample of 1,000 ASCO members was contacted by mail and email to complete a survey regarding clinical approaches to herb and supplement (HS) use by cancer patients. Results: Of 927 deliverable surveys, 423 surveys were returned for a response rate of 46%. Respondents were mostly men (72%), Caucasian (76%), with a median age of 48. Approximately 16% reported no religion, 19% Jewish, 24% Catholic, 28% Christian, and 13% other religions. Eighteen percent reported attending religious services at least once a week including 15% who attend several times per week. Twenty-eight percent reported high theological pluralism (skepticism regarding whether one religion is the only true religion). Fifty-eight percent self-described themselves as very or moderately spiritual. Univariate analyses indicated significant correlations with self-reported spirituality and religious service attendance and the likelihood of personal CAM use, recommending any CAM, and recommending HS. In multivariate analyses, predictors of personal CAM use were: female gender (OR = 5.6, CI 0.09-0.37), non-Caucasian (OR = 3.0, CI 0.16-0.70), educated in HS (OR = 2.6, CI 1.37-5.08), attending religious services less than monthly (OR = 3.0, CI 0.17-0.65), and self –reported high or moderate spirituality (OR = 3.2, CI 1.5-6.6). Physician predictors for sometimes or often recommending HS were male gender (OR = 1.85, CI 0.92-3.75) and self–reported low spirituality (OR = 2.9, CI, 0.15-0.77). Recommending CAM was associated with female gender (OR = 2.6, CI 0.15-0.97), educated in HS (OR = 3.4, CI 1.46-7.78), and self–reported high or moderate spirituality (OR = 2.8, CI 1.26-6.31). No correlations were found with religious affiliation. Conclusions: This is the first study to identify self-reported spirituality as a significant factor among US oncologists’ decision to use CAM and recommend CAM to patients, and further studies are needed to explore this potential influence.