Search

Se analizó el comportamiento reproductivo y la variación de la proporción sexual del camaroncito rojo Pleuroncodes monodon. Las muestras provinieron de lances experimentales en tres cruceros de evaluación hidroacústica de recursos pelágicos durante 2001 frente a la costa peruana. Un total de 8517 ejemplares fueron diferenciados según el sexo. Los machos presentaron un marcado dimorfismo sexual, mientras que las hembras se diferenciaron entre aquellas ovígeras y no ovígeras. Las tallas entre sexos no mostraron diferencias significativas (prueba de Kolmogorov-Smirnov, P > 0.05); las tallas medias fueron menores que 20 mm de longitud cefalotorácica. La proporción sexual indicó que en invierno hubo una mayor predominancia de machos que de hembras (prueba χ², P < 0.05). Se observaron hembras ovígeras durante todo el periodo de estudio, con mayor actividad en primavera, y una dispersión de la población en la temporada reproductiva. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The breeding behavior and sex ratio variation of the carrot squat lobster Pleuroncodes monodon were analyzed. Specimens were collected from experimental hauls in three acoustic pelagic resource assessment surveys during 2001 off the Peruvian coast. A total of 8517 individuals were differentiated according to sex. Males showed clear sexual dimorphism, while females were divided into ovigerous or non-ovigerous individuals. Size did not differ significantly between sexes (Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, P > 0.05); average sizes were smaller than 20 mm cephalothoraxic length. The sex ratio indicated that in winter males were more predominant than females (χ² test, P < 0.05). Ovigerous females were observed during all the period of study, with major activity in spring, and population dispersion occurred during the breeding season. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Fisheries are highly complex social-ecological systems that often face 'wicked' problems from unsustainable resource management to climate change. Addressing these challenges requires transdisciplinary approaches that integrate perspectives across scientific disciplines and knowledge systems. Despite widespread calls for transdisciplinary fisheries research (TFR), there are still limitations in personal and institutional capacity to conduct and support this work to the highest potential. The viewpoints of early career researchers (ECRs) in this field can illuminate challenges and promote systemic change within fisheries research. This paper presents the perspectives of ECRs from across the globe, gathered through a virtual workshop held during the 2021 World Fisheries Congress, on goals, challenges, and future potential for TFR. Big picture goals for TFR were guided by principles of co-production and included (i) integrating transdisciplinary thinking at all stages of the research process, (ii) ensuring that research is inclusive and equitable, (iii) co-creating knowledge that is credible, relevant, actionable, and impactful, and (iv) consistently communicating with partners. Institutional inertia, lack of recognition of the extra time and labour required for TFR, and lack of skill development opportunities were identified as three key barriers in conducting TFR. Several critical actions were identified to help ECRs, established researchers, and institutions reach these goals. We encourage ECRs to form peer-mentorship networks to guide each other along the way. We suggest that established researchers ensure consistent mentorship while also giving space to ECR voices. Actions for institutions include retooling education programs, developing and implementing new metrics of impact, and critically examining individualism and privilege in academia. We suggest that the opportunities and actions identified here, if widely embraced now, can enable research that addresses complex challenges facing fishery systems contributing to a healthier future for fish and humans alike., Competing Interests: Conflict of interestThe authors declare no competing interests in the publication of this work., (© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2022, Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.)

Increasing attention is paid to the interdependence between the ecological and human dimensions to improve the management of natural resources. Understanding how artisanal fishers see and use the common-pool resources in a co-management system may hold the clue to establishing effective coastal fisheries policies or strengthening existing ones. A more comprehensive planning of the system will also have a bearing on how to reduce conflicts and strengthen social networks. We surveyed artisanal fishers and decision-makers to determine their perceptions about the Management and Exploitation Areas of Benthic Resources (known as MEABR) in Chile's Biobio region. We performed a field study from November 2018 to August 2019, applying a set of questionnaires to determine the ecological and human attributes that contribute to MEABR outcomes, and then constructed composite scores for those attributes according to a multidimensional scaling technique ("Rapfish"). We find that fishers have different perspectives: surprisingly, women highlighted that the institutional dimension was the most influential on MEABR performance, whereas men highlighted the ecological and economic outcomes. The decision-makers' role in the MEABR system was considered adequate, but communication and socialization of regulations were irregular. Results also showed that fishers expressed dissatisfaction with illegal fishing practices (poaching), productivity, profits, and conflicts inside and outside the MEABRs. Our study allowed us to better understand how the MEABR has developed in the region. We recommend strengthening local management strategies with particular attention paid to networking among stakeholders, including gender inclusive relationships., Competing Interests: The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.