1. Impact of spill-in counts from off-target regions on [18F]Flortaucipir PET quantification
- Author
-
Francisco J. López-González, Alejandro Costoya-Sánchez, José Paredes-Pacheco, Alexis Moscoso, Jesús Silva-Rodríguez, and Pablo Aguiar
- Subjects
Tau PET ,Monte Carlo ,Off-target binding ,PVE ,SUVR ,Neurosciences. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry ,RC321-571 - Abstract
Background: [18F]Flortaucipir (FTP) PET quantification is usually hindered by spill-in counts from off-target binding (OFF) regions. The present work aims to provide an in-depth analysis of the impact of OFF in FTP PET quantification, as well as to identify optimal partial volume correction (PVC) strategies to minimize this problem. Methods: 309 amyloid-beta (Aβ) negative cognitively normal subjects were included in the study. Additionally, 510 realistic FTP images with different levels of OFF were generated using Monte Carlo simulation (MC). Images were corrected for PVC using both a simple two-compartment and a multi-region method including OFF regions. FTP standardized uptake value ratio (SUVR) was quantified in Braak Areas (BA), the hippocampus (which was not included in Braak I/II) and different OFF regions (caudate, putamen, pallidum, thalamus, choroid plexus (ChPlex), cerebellar white matter (cerebWM), hemispheric white matter (hemisWM) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)) using the lower portion of the cerebellum as a reference region. The correlations between OFF and cortical SUVRs were studied both in real and in simulated PET images, with and without PVC. Results: In-vivo, we found correlations between all OFF and target regions, especially strong for the hemisWM (slope>0.63, R2>0.4). All the correlations were attenuated but remained significant after applying PVC, except for the ChPlex. In MC simulations, the hemisWM and CSF were the main contributors to PVE in all BA (slopes 0.15-0.26 and 0.13-0.21 respectively). The hemisWM (slope=0.2), as well as the ChPlex (slope=0.02), influenced SUVRs in the hippocampus. The CerebWM was negatively correlated with all target regions (slope0.8). While no other correlations between OFF and target regions were found, hemisWM was correlated with all OFF regions but the cerebWM (slopes 0.06-0.33). HemisWM correlations attenuated (slopes
- Published
- 2022
- Full Text
- View/download PDF