Search

Summary Objective Abdominal fat ultrasound (US) is a simple clinical tool that may allow measures of fat depots not visible using common dual‐energy X‐ray absorptiometry (DEXA) or computerized tomography (CT) imaging. The aim of this study was to validate the technique, give measures of superficial and profound subcutaneous, preperitoneal, omental and perirenal (retroperitoneal) fat and correlate them with MS markers. Methods Sequential US measures of these five abdominal fat layers were done at 397 adults. Blood pressure (BP), body mass index (BMI), waist, body fat %, HOMA‐IR index (homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance), lipid profile and leptin were recorded. Metabolic syndrome (MS) was defined according to Cholesterol education programme adult treatment panel III (ATPIII) criteria. Results Subcutaneous and omental fat were increased among people with obesity, whereas preperitoneal and perirenal fat did not show any difference according to BMI or waist. Women showed thicker subcutaneous fat (both superficial and profound), whereas men had bigger omental fat. Both postmenopausal and diabetic patients had changes in omental fat only, whereas patients with fatty liver showed thicker preperitoneal and perirenal fat, as well. MS patients showed both thicker perirenal and omental fat. A cut‐off of 54 mm in male (M)/34 mm in female (F) of omental fat and 22.5 mm (M)/12.5 mm (F) of perirenal fat could be predictive of later MS onset. Conclusions US is a valid method to measure all different abdominal fat depots. Omental and perirenal fat measures may classify patients at risk for MS. Preperitoneal fat depot may also correlate with fatty liver disease.

Optimal management of cardiovascular disease should start with the identification of subjects at subclinical stages. However, available tools are not always accurate or affordable. We assess the usefulness of ultrasound-guided measurement of abdominal fat layers as a surrogate marker of cardiovascular risk. We performed a cross-sectional, case-control, exploratory, pilot study in 10 people living with HIV (PLWH) and 10 HIV-uninfected subjects (control group) matched for age, sex, and body mass index. All participants were men 45-60 years of age, with no active disease or previous abdominal surgery; the PLWH group had been virologically suppressed for >= 2 years under stable antiretroviral therapy. The thickness of abdominal superficial and deep subcutaneous fat, preperitoneal fat, omental (periaortic) fat, and retroperitoneal (perirenal) fat was compared between both groups. Correlations between fat layers and traditional markers of cardiovascular risk were assessed. The thickness of most layers was always higher among PLWH. The differences were statistically significant for the preperitoneal fat layer (p = .04). The presence of atherosclerotic plaque was correlated with the preperitoneal fat layer in the PLWH group (odds ratio = 1.49, p = .02), and metabolic syndrome was correlated with superficial subcutaneous fat, although this was low (odds ratio = 0.54, p = .02). In the control group, several associations were found between carotid intima media thickness and abdominal fat layers. All abdominal fat layers were thicker in the PLWH group, especially preperitoneal fat, and several associations were found between specific fat layers and traditional cardiovascular risk markers. Our results suggest that the thickness of abdominal fat layers, assessed by ultrasound, could be a marker of cardiovascular risk. However, further studies with larger populations are required to confirm these findings.

Breast implants may be responsible for secondary deformities produced by parenchymal atrophy. However, few studies in the literature have reported changes in breast tissue after augmentation surgery. In this study, the breast thickness of patients undergoing breast augmentation was monitored by ultrasound, and correlations with surface, volume and projection measurements were examined. We studied the parenchymal thickness at the lower pole of the breast with ultrasound in 36 women (72 breasts). In another group of 33 patients (66 breasts), we studied the thickness at the upper and lower poles along the meridian of each breast by ultrasound and measured the anthropometric metrics, volume and projection of the breast with a 3D camera. Midline measurements close to the areola showed reduced thickness at the lower pole, with 31.8% at the midpoint of the lower pole and 42% at the infra-areolar level (p

The objective was to evaluate both the effectiveness and safety of urapidil in management of hypertensive emergencies (HE) in the prehospital setting. This was an open, prospective study for 6 months. We evaluated systolic (SBP), diastolic (DBP), and mean blood pressure (MBP), and heart rate (HR) with continuous noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring in 16 consecutive cases of HE. We used urapidil at different doses (25 to 100 mg) at 5 minute intervals, according to the blood pressure response. The basal DBP was 127 +/- 16 mmHg. Urapidil was effective in 15 patients. ANOVA test showed a significant drop out in DBP (P