1. Improved recovery of functionally active eosinophils and neutrophils using novel immunomagnetic technology
- Author
-
Manali Mukherjee, Jose Alfredo Cano Eguez, Kiho Son, Paige Lacy, Brendan A.S. McIntyre, Caroline Ethier, Parameswaran Nair, Francis Davoine, Katherine Radford, Luke J. Janssen, and Nicola LaVigne
- Subjects
0301 basic medicine ,Neutrophils ,Immunology ,Biology ,Flow cytometry ,03 medical and health sciences ,Leukocyte Count ,0302 clinical medicine ,Eosinophil activation ,medicine ,Centrifugation, Density Gradient ,Immunology and Allergy ,Humans ,Centrifugation ,Whole blood ,CD63 ,medicine.diagnostic_test ,Cluster of differentiation ,Immunomagnetic Separation ,Degranulation ,Flow Cytometry ,Molecular biology ,Staining ,Eosinophils ,030104 developmental biology ,030215 immunology - Abstract
Clinically relevant and reliable reports derived from in vitro research are dependent on the choice of cell isolation protocols adopted between different laboratories. Peripheral blood eosinophils are conventionally isolated using density-gradient centrifugation followed by immunomagnetic selection (positive/negative) while neutrophils follow a more simplified dextran-sedimentation methodology. With the increasing sophistication of molecular techniques, methods are now available that promise protocols with reduced user-manipulations, improved efficiency, and better yield without compromising the purity of enriched cell populations. These recent techniques utilize immunomagnetic particles with multiple specificities against differential cell surface markers to negatively select non-target cells from whole blood, greatly reducing the cost/time taken to isolate granulocytes. Herein, we compare the yield efficiencies, purity and baseline activation states of eosinophils/neutrophils isolated using one of these newer protocols that use immunomagnetic beads (MACSxpress isolation) vs. the standard isolation procedures. The study shows that the MACSxpress method consistently allowed higher yields per mL of peripheral blood compared to conventional methods (P
- Published
- 2017