Search

Adding bevacizumab to erlotinib prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) of patients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC in the Japanese JO25567 trial, but limited data were available in non-Asian patients. BEVERLY is an Italian, multicenter, randomized, phase 3 investigating the addition of bevacizumab to erlotinib as first-line treatment of advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC.Eligible patients were randomized 1:1 to erlotinib plus bevacizumab or erlotinib alone. Investigator-assessed PFS and blinded independent centrally reviewed PFS were coprimary end points. With 80% power in detecting a 0.60 hazard ratio and two-sided α error of 0.05, 126 events of 160 patients were needed. The trial was registered as NCT02633189 and EudraCT 2015-002235-17.From April 11, 2016, to February 27, 2019, a total of 160 patients were randomized to erlotinib plus bevacizumab (80) or erlotinib alone (80). At a median follow-up of 36.3 months, median investigator-assessed PFS was 15.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 12.2-18.6) with erlotinib plus bevacizumab and 9.6 months (95% CI: 8.2-10.6) with erlotinib alone (hazard ratio = 0.66, 95% CI: 0.47-0.92). Blinded independent centrally reviewed PFS analysis confirmed this result. A statistically significant interaction with treatment effect was found for smoking habit (p = 0.0323), with PFS prolongation being clinically significant only among current or previous smokers. Hypertension (grade ≥3: 24% versus 5%), skin rash (grade ≥ 3: 31% versus 14%), thromboembolic events (any grade: 11% versus 4%), and proteinuria (any grade: 23% versus 6%) were more frequent with the combination.The addition of bevacizumab to first-line erlotinib prolonged PFS in Italian patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC; toxicity was increased with the combination but without unexpected safety issues.

Francesco Rosetti’s contribution is divided into four sections, aiming to analyze how Machiavelli’s work influenced artists in dealing with the image of political power. The first section deals with Niccolo Machiavelli’s own portraits, arguing that he became the proverbial image of the courtier. This image in its turn influenced the idea of state portraits. The second section analyzes the depiction of rulers during the Renaissance and how the Machiavellian idea of power was expressed artistically. The third and fourth sections focus on the evolution of this model in Napoleon and his propaganda, especially its effort to create popular art and its influence on totalitarian art until Andy Warhol’s revolutionary approach to the icons of power.

Introduction Pemetrexed maintenance therapy (MT) after induction with platinum-based chemotherapy has recently become a common treatment strategy for advanced nonsquamous non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the benefits of MT should be weighed with consideration of the patients' perceptions and preferences. The aim of the present study was to evaluate patients' attitudes toward MT and to describe physicians' awareness of their patients' inclinations. Materials and Methods We administered a 12-question anonymous survey and the Distress Thermometer Questionnaire to patients with advanced or recurrent nonsquamous NSCLC. The survey was also distributed to the referring physicians. Results From December 2014 to July 2015, 92 patients and 37 physicians were enrolled. All 92 patients completed the questionnaire at T0 (before starting chemotherapy) and 56.5% also did so at T1 (after completion of induction). The physicians completed the survey only at T0. Most patients had a positive attitude toward MT at both T0 (78.9%) and T1 (86.5%), and 100% of the physicians thought their patients would be in favor of MT. The physicians believed that their patients' attitudes toward MT would decrease proportionally with the reduction in the magnitude of the overall survival increase and expected benefits. The decrease expected by the physicians was much greater than that reported by the patients. This was especially true for an overall survival increase as small as 1 month (51.9% of patients accepting MT vs. 13.5% supposed by physicians) or when the only treatment benefit was radiologic tumor stabilization (69.3% of patients accepting MT vs. 37.8% supposed by physicians). Conclusion NSCLC patients have a generally positive attitude toward MT, which is not directly proportional to the expected benefits and greater than the attitude expected by physicians.

Introduction Gefitinib, erlotinib, and afatinib represent the approved first-line options for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Because pivotal trials frequently lack external validity, real-world data may help to depict the diagnostic-therapeutic pathway and treatment outcome in clinical practice. Methods MOST is a multicenter observational study promoted by the Veneto Oncology Network, aiming at monitoring the diagnostic-therapeutic pathway of patients with nonsquamous EGFR-mutant NSCLC. We reported treatment outcome in terms of median time to treatment failure (mTTF) and assessed the impact of each agent on the expense of the regional health system, comparing it with a prediction based on the pivotal trials. Results An EGFR mutation test was performed in 447 enrolled patients, of whom 124 had EGFR mutation and who received gefitinib (n = 69, 55%), erlotinib (n = 33, 27%), or afatinib (n = 22, 18%) as first-line treatment. Because erlotinib was administered within a clinical trial to 15 patients, final analysis was limited to 109 patients. mTTF was 15.3 months, regardless of the type of tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) used. In the MOST study, the budget impact analysis showed a total expense of €3,238,602.17, whereas the cost estimation according to median progression-free survival from pivotal phase III trials was €1,813,557.88. Conclusion Good regional adherence and compliance to the diagnostic-therapeutic pathway defined for patients with nonsquamous NSCLC was shown. mTTF did not significantly differ among the three targeted TKIs. Our budget impact analysis suggests the potential application of real-world data in the process of drug price negotiation. Implications for practice The MOST study is a real-world data collection reporting a multicenter adherence and compliance to diagnostic-therapeutic pathways defined for patients with epidermal growth factor receptor-mutant non-small cell lung cancer. This represents an essential element of evidence-based medicine, providing information on patients and situations that may be challenging to assess using only data from randomized controlled trials, e.g., turn-around time of diagnostic tests, treatment compliance and persistence, guideline adherence, challenging-to-treat populations, drug safety, comparative effectiveness, and cost effectiveness. This study may be of interest to various stakeholders (patients, clinicians, and payers), providing a meaningful picture of the value of a given therapy in routine clinical practice.

Purpose To test the efficacy of adding cisplatin to first-line treatment for elderly patients with advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) within a combined analysis of two parallel phase III trials, MILES-3 and MILES-4. Patients and Methods Patients with advanced NSCLC who were older than age 70 years with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 1 were randomly assigned to gemcitabine or pemetrexed, without or with cisplatin. In each trial, 382 events were required to detect a hazard ratio (HR) of death of 0.75, with 80% power and two-tailed α of .05. Trials were closed prematurely because of slow accrual, but the joint database allowed us to analyze the efficacy of cisplatin on the basis of intention-to-treat and adjusted by trial, histotype, non-platinum companion drug, stage, performance status, sex, age, and size of the study center. Results From March 2011 to August 2016, 531 patients (MILES-3, 299; MILES-4, 232) were assigned to gemcitabine or pemetrexed without (n = 268) or with cisplatin (n = 263). Median age was 75 years, 79% were male, and 70% had nonsquamous histology. At a median 2-year follow-up, 384 deaths and 448 progression-free survival events were recorded. Overall survival was not significantly prolonged with cisplatin (HR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.70 to 1.05; P = .14) and global health status score of quality of life was not improved, whereas progression-free survival (HR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.63 to 0.92; P = .005) and objective response rate (15.5% v 8.5%; P = .02) were significantly better. Significantly more severe hematologic toxicity, fatigue, and anorexia were found with cisplatin. Conclusion The addition of cisplatin to single-agent chemotherapy does not significantly prolong overall survival, and it does not improve global health status score of quality of life in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC.

Background: Epidemiological studies indicated that the presence of insulin resistance is an adverse prognostic factor in MBC. Recently increasing interest has focused on metformin, an oral insulin- sensitizing drug widely prescribed for type 2 diabetes; unexpensive and well tolerated, metformin has also been shown to have direct antiproliferative properties in breast cancer. We present here the final analysis of a phase II comparative multicentric study on the addition of metformin to first line chemotherapy in MBC non diabetic patients. Methods: This is a Phase II randomized study of HER-2 negative MBC patients with measurable or non-measurable disease; no prior chemotherapy for MBC was allowed. Patients were allowed to have had prior endocrine therapy for MBC and prior adjuvant chemotherapy if completed at least 1 year prior to study entry. Patients were stratified by HOMA Index (>2,5 vs Results: As of June 8th, 2014, 108 patients had been randomised. Median age was 60 yrs (range 36-77); 87% of patients were ER+, 60% had received prior adjuvant CT, with antracyclines in 51% of patients. Prior endocrine therapy for MBC was used in 39% of the patients. Measurable disease was present in 74% of the patients. 48% of the patients were insulin resistant by HOMA Index >2.5 and 60% were overweight (BMI > 25: 16% were obese, BMI >30). At a median follow up of 16 months (range 1 – 48), median PFS (ITT) was 9 months (95% CI 8-14) with AC + M and 11 months (95% CI 7-16) with AC alone, p=.84. No significant interaction was detected between HOMA Index and treatment arm (p = 0.15). Median OS was 30 months (95% CI 14-NE) in Arm A versus 27 (95% CI 17-33) in Arm B, p = .58. The most common toxicities observed were G3/4 neutropenia in 51.5% of patients in arm A vs 69.6% in arm B, with Febrile Neutropenia observed in 2,2% and 5.4% of patients, respectively. As expected G2 diarrhea was reported by 11.1% of patients in Arm A. Conclusions: The addition of M to AC in MBC patients receiving first line chemotherapy did not improve PFS compared with AC alone. M seems to have a protective effect on hematological toxicity. Final results including translational data will be available at SABCS 2014. Citation Format: Alessandra Gennari, Oriana Nanni, Andrea DeCensi, Samanta Sarti, Andrea Freschi, Alessandra Bologna, Lorenzo Gianni, Laura Amaducci, Francesco Rosetti, Filippo Giovanardi, Anna Fedeli, Massimo Ambroggi, Paolo Bruzzi, Dino Amadori. Phase II randomised clinical study of first line chemotherapy plus metformin versus first line chemotherapy alone in HER2 negative, non diabetic, metastatic breast cancer patients: Final results of the MYME study [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-13-02.

Summary Background The addition of cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitors and prolonged constant infusion (PCI) of gemcitabine to treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) might improve treatment efficacy. We aimed to assess whether the addition of rofecoxib or PCI gemcitabine could improve overall survival compared with first-line treatment with cisplatin plus gemcitabine given by standard infusion. Methods Patients with stage IV or IIIb (with supraclavicular nodes or pleural effusion) NSCLC who were under 70 years of age and who had performance status 0 or 1 were eligible for this multicentre, prospective, open-label, randomised phase III trial with 2×2 factorial design. Patients were randomly assigned to one of four treatment groups: group A, gemcitabine 1200 mg/m 2 in a 30-min intravenous infusion on days 1 and 8 and intravenous cisplatin 80 mg/m 2 on day 1, every 21 days for six cycles; group B, the same treatments as group A plus oral rofecoxib 50 mg/day until disease progression; group C, intravenous PCI gemcitabine 1200 mg/m 2 in a 120-min infusion on days 1 and 8 and intravenous cisplatin 80 mg/m 2 on day 1, every 21 days for six cycles; group D, the same drugs as group C plus oral rofecoxib 50 mg/day until disease progression. The primary endpoint was overall survival; secondary endpoints were progression-free survival, response rate, quality of life, and toxicity. Analyses were intention-to-treat. This trial is registered on the clinical trials site of the US National Institutes of Health website http://clinicaltrials.gov/ct/show/NCT00385606. Findings Between Jan 30, 2003, and May 3, 2005, 400 patients were enrolled. Median age was 60 years (range 29–71). PCI gemcitabine did not improve overall survival (median 47 weeks [95% CI 40–55] vs 44 [36–52], with standard gemcitabine infusion, hazard ratio (HR) of death 0·93 [0·74–1·17], p=0·41), progression-free survival, nor any other secondary endpoint. Vomiting and fatigue were significantly worse with PCI gemcitabine. The two rofecoxib groups were closed early (on Oct 1, 2004) due to withdrawal of the drug because of safety issues. With intention-to-treat statistical analyses limited to 240 patients (ie, those randomised before July 1, 2004) who had at least 3 months of treatment, rofecoxib did not prolong overall survival (median 44 weeks [CI 36–55] vs 44 [40–54] without rofecoxib, and HR of death 1·00 [0·75–1·34], p=0·85), or progression-free survival, but did improve response rate (41% vs 26%, p=0·02), global quality of life, physical, emotional and role functioning, fatigue, and sleeping. Rofecoxib significantly increased the incidence of diarrhoea and decreased constipation, fatigue, fever, weight loss, and pain, and analgesic consumption. Severe cardiac ischaemia was more frequent with rofecoxib than without; however, the difference was not statistically significant in the primary analysis (p=0·06) and became significant when patients who were randomised between July 1, 2004, and Sept 30, 2004, were included in the analysis (p=0·03). Interpretation Neither PCI gemcitabine nor rofecoxib prolonged survival in the patients in this study. Rofecoxib improved response rate and several quality-of-life items, including pain-related items and global quality of life. Further studies with less cardiotoxic COX-2 inhibitors are needed in NSCLC.

Background:The combination of intravenous paclitaxel (three-times weekly administration at a dose of 175 mg/m2) and oral capecitabine has been shown to be highly active in the treatment of advanced or metastatic breast cancer. Currently, there is much interest in the use of relatively low dose weekly paclitaxel infusions in this clinical setting. Aim:To assess the activity and safety of capecitabine plus weekly paclitaxel at a dose of 60 mg/m2in heavily pretreated metastatic breast cancer patients. Patients and methods:Patients were required to have pretreated metastatic breast cancer with measurable/ evaluable disease and a performance status of 0–2 (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group score). Capecitabine was administered orally at a dosage of 1000 mg/m2twice daily on days 1–14, followed by a 7-day rest period. Paclitaxel was administered as a 1-hour intravenous infusion on a weekly basis at a dose of 60 mg/m2. Twenty-one days of therapy represented one cycle. Results:The hypothesis of activity of the capecitabine-paclitaxel combination at the level of clinical interest (40% response rate) was accepted when the 15th response was observed and 33 patients were enrolled. The median progression-free survival and median overall survival estimates were 9.2 and 19.6 months, respectively. Therapy was generally well tolerated and manageable on an outpatient basis. The following grade 3/4 adverse events were observed: hand-foot syndrome (21.2%), neutropenia (12.1%), anemia, nausea/vomiting, stomatitis/ mucositis, and nail disorders (all occurred in 9.0%), and vascular/coagulation disorders (

Introduction: Treatment of elderly patients with small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is based on scanty evidence. Methods: Patients with extensive SCLC, age >70 years, and performance status 0-2 were eligible for a study looking for optimal two-drug combination of gemcitabine (Gem) with vinorelbine (Vin), etoposide (Eto), cisplatin (Cis), or carboplatin (Car). Gemcitabine dose was the same (1000 mg/m2, days 1-8) in all combinations. A two-stage minimax flexible design for response was applied to GemVin combination (Vin 25 mg/m2, days 1-8). For GemCar, GemCis, GemEto, a phase I-II Bayesian design was applied, looking for the optimal dose of the partner drugs. Objective response rate ≥60% and unacceptable toxicity ≤25% were required to define a combination worthy of further studies. Results: Median age of 78 eligible patients was 74 years. GemVin produced a 36.7% objective response rate. GemEto and GemCis arms were found not sufficiently active. GemCar produced 16 responses (14 with area under the curve [AUC] 3.5 and 2 with AUC 4.0) in 26 patients (61.5%) and 6 cases of unacceptable toxicity (3 at each Car dose). Conclusions: In elderly patients with extensive SCLC, GemVin, GemEto, and GemCis are not enough active and do not merit further studies. Gem plus Car might deserve further attention. © 2011 by the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

Pain is a highly distressing symptom for patients with advanced cancer. WHO analgesic ladder is widely accepted as a guideline for its treatment. Our aim was to describe pain prevalence among patients diagnosed with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), impact of pain on quality of life (QoL) and adequacy of pain management. Data of 1021 Italian patients enrolled in three randomised trials of chemotherapy for NSCLC were pooled. QoL was assessed by EORTC QLQ-C30 and LC-13. Analgesic consumption during the 3 weeks following QoL assessment was recorded. Adequacy of pain management was evaluated by the Pain Management Index (PMI). Some pain was reported by 74% of patients (42% mild, 24% moderate and 7% severe); 50% stated pain was affecting daily activities (30% a little, 16% quite a bit, 336 very much). Bone metastases strongly affected presence of pain. Mean global QoL linearly decreased from 64.9 to 36.4 from patients without pain to those with severe pain (P < 0.001). According to PMI, 616 out of 752 patients reporting pain (82%) received inadequate analgesic treatment. Bone metastases were associated with improved adequacy and worst pain with reduced adequacy at multivariate analysis. In conclusion, pain is common in patients with advanced NSCLC, significantly affects QoL, and is frequently undertreated. We recommend that: (i) pain self-assessment should be part of oncological clinical practice; (ii) pain control should be a primary goal in clinical practice and in clinical trials; (iii) physicians should receive more training in pain management; (iv) analgesic treatment deserves greater attention in protocols of anticancer treatment. © 2004 Cancer Research UK.

Background: Vinorelbine prolongs survival and improves quality of life in elderly patients with advanced non-smallcell lung cancer (NSCLC). Some studies have also suggested that gemcitabine is well tolerated and effective in such patients. We compared the effectiveness and toxicity of the combination of vinorelbine plus gemcitabine with those of each drug given alone in an open-label, randomized phase III trial in elderly patients with advanced NSCLC. Methods: Patients aged 70 years and older, enrolled between December 1997 and November 2000, were randomly assigned to receive intravenous vinorelbine (30 mg/m 2 of body surface area), gemcitabine (1200 mg/m 2 ), or vinorelbine (25 mg/m 2 ) plus gemcitabine (1000 mg/m 2 ). All treatments were delivered on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks for a maximum of six cycles. The primary endpoint was survival. Survival curves were drawn using the Kaplan–Meier method and analyzed by the Mantel–Haenszel test. Secondary endpoints were quality of life and toxicity. Results: Of 698 patients available for intention-to-treat analysis, 233 were assigned to receive vinorelbine, 233 to gemcitabine, and 232 to vinorelbine plus gemcitabine. Compared with each single drug, the combination treatment did not improve survival. The hazard ratio of death for patients receiving the combination treatment was 1.17 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.95 to 1.44) that of patients receiving vinorelbine and 1.06 (95% CI = 0.86 to 1.29) that of patients receiving gemcitabine. Although quality of life was similar across the three treatment arms, the combination treatment was more toxic than the two drugs given singly. Conclusion: The combination of vinorelbine plus gemcitabine is not more effective than single-agent vinorelbine or gemcitabine in the treatment of elderly patients with advanced NSCLC. [J Natl Cancer Inst 2003;95: 362–72]

e20676 Background: Elderly and patients with ECOG PS ≥ 2 often present with medical and physiological characteristics that make the selection of their treatment more challenging. Single-agent vinorelbine improves survival and quality of life compared with best supportive care. At constant effectiveness between two treatments formulations patient preference must be taken into account. Methods: Stage IIIB or IV NSCLC patients candidates to receive a first line chemotherapy with Vinorelbine alone due to age ≥ 70 and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance status ≤2 or age ≤ 70 but ECOG PS ≥ 2, could enter the study. Patients were randomized to receive: • Arm A: first cycle of IV vinorelbine (30 mg/m2) and second cycle of oral vinorelbine (60mg/m2) • Arm B: first cycle of oral vinorelbine followed by a second cycle of IV vinorelbine. In both arms vinorelbine was administered at day 1 and day 8 every 3 weeks. From the third cycle onwards patients had to choose to continue with oral or intravenous vinorelbine. The dosage of oral vinorelbine could be subsequently increased to 80 mg/m2 at physician’s choice. Treatment continued until disease progression, intolerable toxicity or patient refusal. The primary objective of the study was the patient preference for oral or intravenous vinorelbine. Results: Ninety-three patients entered the study and were randomized. Sixty-two were able to complete the first two cycles and to express a preference (32 in Arm A and 30 in Arm B). Forty-five out of 62 were males and 17 females. Median age was 80 (72-89). Nineteen patients had an ECOG PS of 0, 39 a PS of 1 and 4 a PS of 2 (30.7%, 62.9% and 6.4% respectively). Eighteen patients (29%) decided to continue with IV vinorelbine while 44 patients (71%) expressed a preference for oral vinorelbine p = 0.001 (Gart's test). Regarding secondary enpoints, median OS was 5.7 (4.7-7.7) and 5.5 (3.8-9.1) months and median PFS was 3.5 (2.4-4.4) and 3.5 (3.5-5.0) for arm A and arm B respectively. Conclusions: The study has clearly demonstrated that elderly or frail patients with NSCLC prefer to receive an oral rather than an intravenous chemotherapy. The reasons for the choice were expressed in a questionnaire still in evaluation. Clinical trial information: nct01848613.

9002 Background: The role of platinum in first line treatment of elderly patients with advanced NSCLC is still debated. We tested its efficacy in two parallel phase 3 trials. Methods: Advanced NSCLC patients, > 70 years, ECOG performance status 0-1, were eligible. In MILES-3 (started in 2011) patients with any tumor histology were randomly assigned 1:1 to cisplatin/gemcitabine (C 60 mg/m² d1, G 1000mg/m² dd1,8) or gemcitabine (G 1200 mg/m² dd1,8). In MILES-4 (started in 2013 with a factorial design) patients with non-squamous histology were randomly assigned 1:1:1:1 to CG, G, cisplatin/pemetrexed (C 60 mg/m² d1, P 500 mg/m² d1) or pemetrexed (P 500 mg/m² d1). Six cycles were planned. In each trial, to have 80% power in detecting a HR of death 0.75 (corresponding to 3-month prolongation of median survival), with 0.05 two-tailed α, 382 events were required. The two trials were closed prematurely because of slow accrual but a joint analysis allowed to properly perform the final analysis, according to IDMC advice. Analysis was based on intention-to treat and adjusted by possible confounding factors. Results: From Mar 2011 to Aug 2016, 531 patients (MILES-3: 299, MILES-4: 232) were assigned to cisplatin-doublet (n = 263) or single-agent chemotherapy (n = 268). Median age was 75, 79% were male, 70% had non-squamous histology. Median number of cycles was 4 and 3 with and without cisplatin, respectively. With a median follow-up of 2 years, 384 deaths and 448 progression-free survival (PFS) events were reported. With and without cisplatin, median OS was 9.6 vs 7.5 months (HR 0.86, 95% CI: 0.70-1.04, p = 0.14); median PFS was 4.6 vs 3.0 months (HR 0.76, 95% CI: 0.63-0.92, p = 0.005); response rate was 15.5% vs 8.5% (p = 0.02). Significantly more severe hematologic toxicity and fatigue were reported with cisplatin. Conclusions: Although improving PFS and response rate, addition of cisplatin to single-agent chemotherapy does not significantly prolong overall survival of elderly patients with advanced NSCLC. QOL data will be reported separately. Partially supported by AIFA (grant FARM8KAJZK) and Eli Lilly. Clinical trial information: NCT01405586 and NCT01656551.

Background Although first-line therapy for patients affected by advanced mesothelioma is well established, there is a lack of data regarding the impact of second-line treatment. Methods We retrospectively collected data of patients affected by advanced mesothelioma, already treated with first-line therapy based on pemetrexed and platin, with a response (partial response or stable disease) lasting at least 6 months, and re-treated with a pemetrexed-based therapy at progression. The primary objective was to describe time to progression and overall survival after re-treatment. Results Overall across several Italian oncological Institutions we found 30 patients affected by advanced mesothelioma, in progression after a 6-month lasting clinical benefit following a first-line treatment with cisplatin and pemetrexed, and re-challenged with a pemetrexed-based therapy. In these patients we found a disease control rate of 66%, with reduction of pain in 43% of patients. Overall time to progression and survival were promising for a second-line setting of patients with advanced mesothelioma, being 5.1 and 13.6 months, respectively. Conclusions In our opinion, when a patient has a long-lasting benefit from previous treatment with pemetrexed combined with a platin compound, the same treatment should be offered at progression.

Summary Background Chemotherapy is the standard treatment for advanced non-small-cell lung cancer, and myelosuppression is a common side-effect. We aimed to assess whether haematological toxic effects could be a biological measure of drug activity and a marker of efficacy. Methods We analysed data for 1265 patients who received chemotherapy (vinorelbine, gemcitabine, gemcitabine and vinorelbine, cisplatin and vinorelbine, or cisplatin and gemcitabine) within three randomised trials. Primary landmark analyses were restricted to 436 patients who received all six planned chemotherapy cycles and who were alive 180 days after randomisation. Neutropenia was categorised on the basis of worst WHO grade during chemotherapy: absent (grade 0), mild (grade 1–2), or severe (grade 3–4). All statistical analyses were stratified by treatment allocation. Analyses were repeated in the out-of-landmark group (829 patients), stratifying by treatment allocation and number of chemotherapy cycles. The primary endpoint was overall survival. Findings In the landmark group, hazard ratios of death were 0·65 (0·46–0·93) for patients with severe neutropenia and 0·74 (0·56–0·98) for those with mild neutropenia. Median survival after the landmark time of 180 days was 31·4 weeks (95% CI 25·7–39·6) for patients without neutropenia compared with 42·0 weeks (32·7–59·7) for patients with severe neutropenia, and with 43·7 weeks (36·6–66·0) for those with mild neutropenia (severe vs mild vs no neutropenia p=0·0118). Findings were much the same for the out-of-landmark group. Interpretation Neutropenia during chemotherapy is associated with increased survival of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer, and its absence might be a result of underdosing. Prospective trials are needed to assess whether drug dosing guided by the occurrence of toxic effects could improve efficacy of standard regimens.

e21018 Background: Ten to 15% of patients (pts) with breast cancer (BC) will be diagnosed with central nervous system (CNS) metastases, and autopsy series suggest that up to 30% of pts have evidenc...

e18117 Background: NSCLC is a very uncommon in pts ≤ 40 years and is usually considered as a distinct disease, with a better prognosis compared to older pts. In recent years, third generation drugs...

1069 Background: Ten to 15% of patients (pts) with breast cancer will be diagnosed with central nervous system (CNS) metastases, and autopsy series suggest that up to 30% of pts have evidence of CNS disease at the time of death. The idenfication of factors that may predispose to CNS metastasis may help lead to earlier detection and possibly to improvement in disease management. Methods: Breast cancer pts with CNS metastases were identified within a database of 1300 breast cancer diganoses from 1995 to 2007 at the Department of Oncology, Azienda ULSS 13 VE. Pathologic features of tumor samples were examined using standard immunohistochemical assays. Results: Fifty-one pts with CNS metastases were identified. Median age at primary breast cancer diagnosis was 49 years (range, 28–78); median time to CNS metastases was 45 months (range, 3–244). HER2 overexpression was found in tumors from 25 pts (49.0%); 23 pts had tumors lacking overexpression of HER2, estrogen receptors (ER), and progesterone receptors (PgR) (ie, “triple negative” disease). Overexpression of p53 (at least 20% tumor cells positive), Ki67 (at least 20%), and BCL2 (at least 30%) were detected in tumors from 16 pts (31.4%), 32 pts (62.7%), and 14 pts (27.5%), respectively. Median survival from CNS involvement was 3.67 months (95% CI 2.05–5.28), with 24.4% and 15.3% of patients estimated to be alive at 12 and 24 months, respectively (Kaplan-Meier product limit method). A Cox proportional hazards analysis found that Ki67 overexpression was the only factor independently associated with a significantly increased risk of death (2.7-fold increase, p=0.028), while triple negative status was associated with a 1.8-fold increase in the risk of death (P=0.08) (Table). Conclusions: In our series of breast cancer pts with CNS metastases, nearly all had either HER2 overexpression or triple-negative disease. Pts whose tumors had higher proliferative indices, assessed by Ki67, had the poorest prognosis. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

21094 Background: T-2a creates a reversible double-strand DNA break allowing DNA doubling. Anthracyclines (A) stabilize the DNA double-strand breaks, and T-2a is probably the primary molecular target of A. Due to the close location of T-2a and Her-2 genes on chromosome 17, T-2a gene aberrations are mainly associated with Her-2 gene amplification; while a correlation exists between Her-2 amplification and protein overexpression this is not true for T-2a. A linear correlation between T-2a and Ki67 labeling indices was found, suggesting that both essentially reflect cellular proliferation. The correlation between T-2a overexpression and both Her-2 and Ki67 was investigated in a series of consecutive patients undergone neoadjuvant A-containing chemotherapy for locally-advanced breast cancer. Material and Methods: T-2a expression was measured by means of monoclonal antibody Ki-S1; thresholds (ts) for immunopositivity were tested at 10%, 15% and 20%, respectively. Both the anti-c-erb-B2 primary antibody (clone CB11) and the Dako test were employed to recognize c-erb-B2 protein. Ki67 was measured using the MIB-1 antibody, with ts for positivity at 10%. Patients were required to have a cT>2cm breast cancer. The neoadjuvant chemotherapy included Adriamycin 60mg/m2 or Epirubicin 75mg/m2, in combination with Paclitaxel (175 mg/m2), every 3 weeks for 4 cycles. Bivariate correlations were performed according to Pearson. Results: 38 patients were enrolled until August, 2006. A significant correlation between T-2a and Ki67 was found (r=.598; P No significant financial relationships to disclose.

7125 Background: Single-agent chemotherapy is the standard treatment for elderly pts with advanced NSCLC, following the results of the ELVIS and MILES-1 trials. Some hints that infusing gemcitabine at a fixed dose rate of 10 mg/m2/minute can optimize its pharmacokinetics have been reported. A prospective phase 2 study was conducted to describe activity and toxicity of PCI-G. Methods: Advanced (stage IV or IIIb with supraclavear nodes or pleural effusion) NSCLC pts, aged >70, PS 0–1, were eligible. 51 patients were required according to a single-stage phase 2 design to have 90% confidence in estimating a 25% ±10% response rate. Response was assessed with RECIST; toxicity was coded with NCI-CTC. Results: From October 2002 to June 2003, 51 pts were enrolled. 26 pts (51%) were older than 75 years. Two complete and seven partial responses were observed, for an overall response rate of 17.6% (95% exact CI: 8–31). The median progression-free survival was 16 wks (95% CI: 11–21) and the median overall survival was 41 wks (95% CI: 28–51). Two toxic deaths were recorded (1 bronchial bleeding and 1 hepatic toxicity). Other relevant toxicities were (% of pts): grade 3–4 neutropenia (11.8%), grade 3 thrombocytopenia (5.9%), grade 3 pulmonary toxicity (3.9%) and grade 3 liver toxicity (3.9%); platelet transfusion, grade 3 anemia, RBC transfusion, non-neutropenic infection, and grade 4 neurotoxicity were all reported in one pt each. Conclusions: In this phase 2 prospective study dedicated to elderly pts with advanced NSCLC, PCI-G was not sufficiently active to warrant further investigation. No significant financial relationships to disclose.