Search

Biliary tract cancer’s (BTC) treatment main stone for advanced stages is constituted by chemotherapy. Surgical centralization and physicians’ confidence in the use of new technologies and molecular analysis turned out to be of interest and potentially influencing survival. After applying a random-effect model, the relationship between each clinical variable on the main outcome was investigated through multilevel mixed-effects logistic regression. The risk-standardized outcomes were calculated for each centre involved. In the unadjusted cohort the median survival was 8.6 months (95%C.I.: 7.8–9.3) with a 9-month survival rate of 48.3% (95%C.I.: 45.0–51.5). A substantial heterogeneity across hospitals was found (I2: 70.3%). In multilevel mixed effect logistic regression, male, being treated for gallbladder cancer, higher ECOG, increased NLR, CEA and Ca 19.9 and low value of haemoglobin showed to increase the odds for 9-month mortality. The model estimated that the residual variance observed in 9-month mortality was attributable for the 2.6% to the treating hospital. Through a multilevel mixed effect model, average risk-standardized mortality within 9 months was 50.1%. As noticeable, all hospital’s risk-standardized mortality falls within 95%C.I., thus all participating centres provided similar outcomes when adjusted for patient case-mix. Heterogenicity between hospital did not affect the outcome in term of overall survival.

The management of the primary tumor in metastatic colorectal, gastric and pancreatic cancer patients may be challenging. Indeed, primary tumor progression could be associated with severe symptoms, compromising the quality of life and the feasibility of effective systemic therapy, and might result in life-threatening complications. While retrospective series have suggested that surgery on the primary tumor may confer a survival advantage even in asymptomatic patients, randomized trials seem not to definitively support this hypothesis. We discuss the evidence for and against primary tumor resection for patients with metastatic gastrointestinal (colorectal, gastric and pancreatic) cancers treated with systemic therapies and put in context the pros and cons of the onco-surgical approach in the time of precision oncology. We also evaluate current ongoing trials on this topic, anticipating how these will influence both research and everyday practice.

Background This study was designed to demonstrate the non-inferiority (NI) in overall survival (OS) of suspension of androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) versus maintenance and intermittent versus continuous docetaxel administration in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients. Patients and methods mCRPC patients were randomised to first-line docetaxel with maintenance or suspension of ADT. Patients attaining a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response after four chemotherapy cycles underwent second randomisation to receive continuous or intermittent docetaxel therapy. Six hundred patients were to be randomised to achieve 80% statistical power to demonstrate an NI hazard ratio (HR) of 1.25 of interruption versus maintenance of ADT. Results The trial was prematurely closed when 198 participants were randomised. OS was similar in patients who continued (N = 96) versus those who interrupted (n = 102) ADT during docetaxel therapy (HR 0.98, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72–1.33] and those on a continuous (N = 35) versus an intermittent (N = 42) docetaxel schedule (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.55–1.43). No difference in radiological progression-free survival, PSA response, or toxicity was observed between the study arms. The actual NI hazard margins of OS in Arms A and B patients were 1.33 and 1.43, respectively. Conclusions This trial enrolled one-third of the planned patients; this main weakness dramatically limits the interpretation of the results. ADT discontinuation and switching to an intermittent schedule did not seem to affect docetaxel efficacy. The absence of testosterone recovery in the majority of patients could have been a contributory factor. In men with mCRPC, ADT discontinuation should only be done with regular biochemical and clinical monitoring, with the option of quickly restarting ADT at disease progression.

Key Points Question Do patients receiving abiraterone acetate with prednisone as first-line therapy for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with bone metastases benefit from the addition of bone resorption inhibitors? Findings In this cohort study of 745 patients receiving first-line abiraterone acetate with prednisone for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with bone metastases, the use of concomitant bone resorption inhibitors was associated with improvements in overall survival, particularly among those with a high volume of disease. Meaning These findings suggest that the addition of bone resorption inhibitors to abiraterone acetate with prednisone as first-line therapy could be beneficial for the treatment of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer with bone metastases., Importance Bone resorption inhibitors (BRIs) are recommended by international guidelines to prevent skeletal-related events (SREs) among patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and bone metastases. Abiraterone acetate with prednisone is currently the most common first-line therapy for the treatment of patients with mCRPC; however, the clinical impact of the addition of BRIs to abiraterone acetate with prednisone in this disease setting is unknown. Objective To evaluate the association of the use of concomitant BRIs with overall survival (OS) and time to first SRE among patients with mCRPC and bone metastases receiving abiraterone acetate with prednisone as first-line therapy. Design, Setting, and Participants This retrospective cohort study collected data from 745 consecutive patients who began receiving abiraterone acetate with prednisone as first-line therapy for mCRPC with bone metastases between January 1, 2013, and December 31, 2016. Data were collected from 8 hospitals in Canada, Europe, and the US from June 15 to September 15, 2019. Exposures Patients were classified by receipt vs nonreceipt of concomitant BRIs and subclassified by volume of disease (high volume or low volume, using definitions from the Chemohormonal Therapy Vs Androgen Ablation Randomized Trial for Extensive Disease in Prostate Cancer [CHAARTED] E3805 study) at the initiation of abiraterone acetate with prednisone therapy. Main Outcomes and Measures The primary end point was OS. The secondary end point was time to first SRE. The Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards models were used. Results Of the 745 men (median age, 77.6 years [interquartile range, 68.1-83.6 years]; 699 White individuals [93.8%]) included in the analysis, 529 men (71.0%) received abiraterone acetate with prednisone alone (abiraterone acetate cohort), and 216 men (29.0%) received abiraterone acetate with prednisone plus BRIs (BRI cohort). A total of 420 men (56.4%) had high-volume disease, and 276 men (37.0%) had low-volume disease. The median follow-up was 23.5 months (95% CI, 19.8-24.9 months). Patients in the BRI cohort experienced significantly longer OS compared with those in the abiraterone acetate cohort (31.8 vs 23.0 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.65; 95% CI, 0.54-0.79; P, This cohort study examines whether the addition of bone resorption inhibitors is associated with improvements in overall survival and skeletal-related events among patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer receiving abiraterone acetate with prednisone as first-line therapy.

Andrea Casadei-Gardini,1 Francesco Montagnani,2 Chiara Casadei,1 Francesca Arcadipane,3 Kalliopi Andrikou,4 Deborah Aloi,5 Alessandra Anna Prete,6,7 Maria Giulia Zampino,8 Antonella Argentiero,9 Giuseppe Pugliese,4 Stefania Martini,10 Giuseppe Carlo Iorio,10 Mario Scartozzi,11 Massimiliano Mistrangelo,12 Lorenzo Fornaro,13 Paola Cassoni,14 Giorgia Marisi,15 Veronica Dell’Acqua,16 Paola Simona Ravenda,8 Sara Lonardi,6 Nicola Silvestris,7 Berardino De Bari,5 Umberto Ricardi,3 Stefano Cascinu,4 Pierfrancesco Franco91Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy; 2Oncology Department, SOC Oncology, ASL (Health Local Authority), Biella, Italy; 3Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza, Turin, Italy; 4Department of Hematology and Oncology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy; 5Radiation Oncology Department, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire “Jean Minjoz”, Besançon Cedex, France; 6Unit of Medical Oncology 1, Department of Clinical and Experimental Oncology, Istituto Oncologico Veneto, IRCCS, Padua, Italy; 7Department of Radiological, Oncological and Pathological Sciences, Policlinico Umberto I University Hospital, Rome, Italy; 8Division of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology and Neuroendocrine Tumors, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; 9Medical Oncology Unit, Cancer Institute Giovanni Paolo II, Bari, Italy; 10Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; 11Department of Medical Oncology, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy; 12Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; 13Unit of Medical Oncology 2, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana University, Pisa, Italy; 14Department of Medical Sciences, Pathology Unit, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; 15Biosciences Laboratory, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per Lo Studio e La Cura Dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy; 16Department of Radiotherapy, IRCCS, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, ItalyBackground: In anal cancer, there are no markers nor other laboratory indexes that can predict prognosis and guide clinical practice for patients treated with concurrent chemoradiation. In this study, we retrospectively investigated the influence of immune inflammation indicators on treatment outcome of anal cancer patients undergoing concurrent chemoradiotherapy.Methods: All patients had a histologically proven diagnosis of squamous cell carcinoma of the anal canal/margin treated with chemoradiotherapy according to the Nigro’s regimen. Impact on prognosis of pre-treatment systemic index of inflammation (SII) (platelet x neutrophil/lymphocyte), neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) were analyzed.Results: A total of 161 consecutive patients were available for the analysis. Response to treatment was the single most important factor for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). At univariate analysis, higher SII level was significantly correlated to lower PFS (p

International audience; BACKGROUND:FOLFIRINOX (leucovorin, 5-fluorouracil, irinotecan, and oxaliplatin) is an option for fit patients with metastatic (MPC) and locally advanced unresectable (LAPC) pancreatic cancer. However, no criteria reliably identify patients with better outcomes.PATIENTS AND METHODS:We investigated putative prognostic factors among 137 MPC/LAPC patients treated with triplet chemotherapy. Association with 6-month survival status (primary endpoint) was assessed by multivariate logistic regression models. A nomogram predicting the risk of death at 6 months was built by assigning a numeric score to each identified variable, weighted on its level of association with survival. External validation was performed in an independent data set of 206 patients. The study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03590275).RESULTS:Four variables (performance status, liver metastases, baseline carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio) were found to be associated with 6-month survival by multivariate analysis or had sufficient clinical plausibility to be included in the nomogram. Accuracy was confirmed in the validation cohort (C index = 0.762; 95% confidence interval, 0.713-0.825). After grouping all cases, 4 subsets with different outcomes were identified by 0, 1, 2, or > 2 poor prognostic features (P < .0001).CONCLUSION:The nomogram we constructed accurately predicts the risk of death in the first 6 months after initiation of FOLFIRINOX in MPC/LAPC patients. This tool could be useful to guide communication about prognosis, and to inform the design and interpretation of clinical trials.

Background HER2 is the only validated predictive biomarker in gastro-oesophageal carcinoma (GOC). However, several factors, such as heterogeneity in protein expression, shortage of evaluable tumour tissue and need for quick target assessment, underline the usefulness of a pre-screening tool in order to anticipate HER2 status. Methods Data from 723 consecutive GOC analysed for HER2 at four Italian Institutions were collected. HER2 positivity was defined as 3+ by immunohistochemistry (IHC) or 2+ with gene amplification by in situ hybridisation (ISH). A multivariate logistic regression model was built using data from 413 cases, whereas 310 patients served as validation cohort. C-index, visual inspection of the calibration plot, Brier score and Spiegelhalter z-test were used to assess the performance of the nomogram. Results HER2 positive rate was 17.4%. Four variables were retained after adjustment in the final model: grading, Lauren’s histotype, pathologic material analysed (surgical specimen/biopsy) and site of tissue collection (primary tumour/metastases). Visual inspection of the calibration plot revealed a very good overlap between predicted and observed probabilities, with a Brier score of 0.101 and a non-significant Spiegelhalter z-test (P = 0.319). C-index resulted in 0.827 (95%CI 0.741–0.913). Conclusion A simple nomogram based on always-available pathologic information accurately predicts the probability of HER2 positivity in GOC.

30 Background: BM in patients (pts) with CRPC are associated with shorter overall survival (OS) and higher costs. BRI zoledronic acid and denosumab are frequently used to prevent skeletal-related events (SRE) in pts with CRPC and BM. AA is the most common 1st line therapy for men with metastatic CRPC. We aimed to assess the impact of BRI on OS and time to first SRE (ttSRE) of pts receiving 1st line treatment AA for CRPC with BM. Methods: A retrospective cohort of pts starting AA as 1st line therapy for CRPC with BM between 2013-2016 was identified through 8 hospitals’ IRB approved registries. Pts were classified by use of concomitant BRI and subgrouped by volume of disease (per E3805 definition) at AA start. Kaplan-Meier method and Cox models were used to assess OS and ttSRE with hazard ratio (HR) estimates (95% CI). Results: Of the 745 pts included (543 deaths), 529 (71.0%) had AA alone and 216 (29.0%) AA+BRI. Median follow-up was 23.5 months. Pts receiving concomitant BRI showed a significantly longer OS and a 35% reduced risk of death compared to AA alone (HR=0.65; 95% CI, 0.54-0.79; P5, PS 0 vs. ≥1, and PSA are independently associated with longer OS. Conclusions: The addition of BRI to 1st line AA for CRPC men with BM was associated with improved OS, particularly in HV, and worsened ttSRE, more evident in LV. These data suggest a potentially different impact of concomitant BRI on HV vs. LV, which could affect clinical decision making.[Table: see text]

Despite the amelioration of systemic therapy, overall survival (OS) of metastatic gastric cancer (GC) patients remains poor. Liver is a common metastatic site and retrospective series suggest a potential OS benefit from hepatectomy, with interesting 5-year (5 y) and 10-year (10 y) OS rates in selected patients. We aim to evaluate the impact of liver resection and related prognostic factors on long-term outcome in this setting.We searched Pubmed, EMBASE, and Abstracts/posters from international meetings since 1990. Data were extracted from publish papers. Random effects models meta-analyses and meta-regression models were built to assess 5yOS and the impact of different prognostic factor. Heterogeneity was assessed using between study variance, IThirty-three observational studies (for a total of 1304 patients) were included. Our analysis demonstrates a 5yOS rate of 22% (95%CI: 18-26%) and 10yOS rate of 11% (95%CI: 7-18%) among patients undergoing radical hepatectomy. A favorable effect on OS was shown by several factors linked to primary cancer (lower T and N stage, no lympho-vascular or serosal invasion) and burden of hepatic disease (≤3 metastases, unilobar involvement, greatest lesion 5 cm, negative resection margins). Moreover, lower CEA and CA19.9 levels and post-resection chemotherapy were associated with improved OS.Surgical resection of liver metastases from GC seems associated with a significant chance of 5yOS and 10yOS and compares favourably with results of medical treatment alone. Prospective evaluation of this approach and validation of adequate selection criteria are needed.

Casadei-Gardini A, Montagnani F, Casadei C, et al. Cancer Manag Res. 2019;11:3631–3642. The authors have advised that the affiliations are not correct in the published paper (page 3631). They have provided revised author and affiliations lists, as follows, and confirm that the modifications do not alter their conflicts of interest status in regard to this work. Andrea Casadei-Gardini,1,2 Francesco Montagnani,3 Chiara Casadei,1 Francesca Arcadipane,4 Kalliopi Andrikou,2 Deborah Aloi,5 Alessandra Anna Prete,6 Maria Giulia Zampino,7 Antonella Argentiero,8 Giuseppe Pugliese,2 Stefania Martini,4 Giuseppe Carlo Iorio,4 Mario Scartozzi,9 Massimiliano Mistrangelo,10 Lorenzo Fornaro,11 Paola Cassoni,12 Giorgia Marisi,13 Veronica Dell’Acqua,14 Paola Simona Ravenda,7 Sara Lonardi,6 Nicola Silvestris,8 Berardino De Bari,5 Umberto Ricardi,4 Stefano Cascinu,2 Pierfrancesco Franco4 1Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy; 2Department of Hematology and Oncology, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy; 3Oncology Department, SOC Oncology, ASL (Health Local Authority), Biella, Italy; 4Department of Oncology, Radiation Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; 5Radiation Oncology Department, Centre Hospitalier Régional Universitaire “Jean Minjoz”, Besançon Cedex, France; 6Unit of Medical Oncology 1, Department of Clinical and Experimental Oncology, Istituto Oncologico Veneto, IRCCS, Padua, Italy; 7Division of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology and Neuroendocrine Tumors, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Milan, Italy; 8Medical Oncology Unit, Cancer Institute Giovanni Paolo II, Bari, Italy; 9Department of Medical Oncology, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy; 10Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; 11Unit of Medical Oncology 2, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana University, Pisa, Italy; 12Department of Medical Sciences, Pathology Unit, University of Turin, Turin, Italy; 13Biosciences Laboratory, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per Lo Studio e La Cura Dei Tumori (IRST) IRCCS, Meldola, Italy; 14Department of Radiotherapy, IRCCS, European Institute of Oncology, Milan, ItalyRead the original article

Clinical data suggest that beyond-progression, the blockade of angiogenesis is associated with improved survivals in colorectal cancer. We conducted a systematic review to investigate the therapeutic effects of antiangiogenic drugs administered as later lines of treatment in patients already progressed to a previous anti-VEGF based treatment. An extensive literature search was conducted. Hazard ratios (HR) for progression (PFS) and death (OS) were extracted. An inverse-variance meta-analysis model was implemented. 6 randomized controlled trials were retrieved, including 3407 patients, treated with different antiangiogenic drugs. All of them had progressed during or after a previous line of treatment with bevacizumab. Overall, both PFS (HR=0.63, P P < 0.001) were significantly increased with the use of antiangiogenic drug. No heterogeneity was observed despite different drugs. Protracted inhibition of the VEGF pathway is associated with a significant improvement of both PFS and OS, independently from the antiangiogenic agent used.

Background Surgery is the mainstay of treatment for oesophageal squamous-cell carcinoma (OSCC) but with poor results. Attempts to improve patient outcome have been made by introducing chemotherapy (CT), radiotherapy (RT), or both (CRT). However, randomized comparisons for all these strategies are not always available. Patients and methods We conducted an extensive literature search for studies comparing surgery with multimodality treatment (i.e. [neo-]adjuvant CT or RT or CRT or definitive CRT). Network meta-analysis was performed in a Bayesian framewor and node-split models were built to assess inconsistency. Results Twenty-five trials including a total of 3866 OSCC patients were included. Neoadjuvant CRT was associated with the most robust survival advantage across different multimodality treatment options (HR 0.73; 95% credible interval [CrI] 0.63–0.86). Definitive CRT was also significantly more effective than surgery but with greater uncertainties (HR 0.62; 95%CrI 0.41–0.96). Neoadjuvant CT (HR 0.90; 95%CrI 0.76–1.07) and adjuvant CRT (HR 1.00; 95%CrI 0.70–1.40) are associated with a non-significant benefit. Conclusions To date, neoadjuvant CRT seems to represent the best approach to maximize the benefit of a multimodality approach.

e16508 Background: BM in patients (pts) with CRPC correlate with higher mortality and costs. BRI zoledronic acid and denosumab are frequently used for the prevention of skeletal-related events (SRE) in pts with CRPC and BM. AA is the most common 1st line treatment for men with metastatic CRPC. We sought to evaluate the impact of BRI on time to first SRE (ttSRE) and OS of pts receiving 1st line therapy AA for CRPC with BM. Methods: We identified a cohort of men starting AA as 1st line therapy for CRPC with BM between 2013-2015 from 7 hospitals’ IRB approved registries. Pts were grouped by use of concomitant BRI and subgrouped by volume of disease (per E3805 definition) at AA start. The endpoints were OS, defined as time from AA start to death or last follow-up visit, and ttSRE. Results: Of the 338 pts included, 256 (76%) received AA alone and 82 (24%) AA+BRI. ECOG PS (PS) was ≥1 for 178 pts (52.7%). No statistically significant difference in ttSRE was found between the 2 cohorts [see Table]. Median follow-up for OS was 25.6 months. Pts receiving concomitant BRI showed a significantly longer OS and a 36% decreased risk of death compared to AA alone (HR = 0.64; 95% CI, 0.64 0.46-0.91; p = 0.012). Notably, OS in the AA alone group was shorter than commonly described. The OS benefit with BRI was greater for men with high volume disease (HV) (HR = 0.42; 95% CI, 0.25-0.71; p = 0.001). On MVA, BRI vs. no BRI, low volume of disease vs. HV, PS 0 vs. ≥1, baseline VAS pain ≤3 vs. > 5, and baseline PSA are independently associated with longer OS. Conclusions: Using a multicenter database, the addition of BRI to 1st line AA for CRPC men with BM and poor prognostic factors did not improve prevention of SRE. However, concomitant use of BRI and AA was associated with a significantly improved OS, particularly in HV. Further research to determine the driving factors is needed. [Table: see text]

Background Genitourinary (GU) cancers are a major healthcare issue in modern oncology. In the last decade many efforts have been made to develop new treatment options but with the possible exception of renal cell carcinoma, very few steps ahead have been taken. At the same time, a wide variety of molecular markers, potentially helpful in identifying patient subpopulation most likely to benefit from a specific treatment have been identified. Our goal is to clarify if biomarkers could be used at present to personalize treatment for GU cancers. Materials and methods Literature was search using PubMed and EMBASE using different terms and combinations regarding possible prognostic and predictive markers in renal, prostate and urothelial cancers. Results 3546 articles were retrieved. After excluding duplications, preclinical studies and factors without possible predictive value 654 publications remain. N-telopeptide, HER2/neu, EGFR, and p53 in prostate cancer, sVEGF-A for RCC and EMMPRIN and Survivin in urothelial cancer were among those identified. After a careful examination of published data, none of them reached a sufficient evidence to be suggested for use outside of clinical trials. Conclusions To date any reliable biomarkers has been validated for tailored treatments approaches in GU cancer. Future studies focusing on this issue are urgently needed.

It is not clear if progression-free survival (PFS) is a good surrogate end-point for overall survival (OS) for metastatic colorectal cancer if antiangiogenic therapies are used.We investigated randomized controlled trials testing antiangiogenic agents against chemotherapy. Log hazard ratios (HR) for PFS and OS were used to construct linear regression models. The surrogate threshold effect (STE) was calculated.Thirteen studies and 24 comparison arms were available, including 7,179 patients. This model returned a significant correlation between PFS and OS (R(2)=0.68, p0.001) with an STE of 0.83. Analysis restricted to first-line gave similar results (R(2)=0.68, p0.001, STE=0.75).There is a significant correlation between the effect of treatment on PFS and OS. PFS remains a good surrogate end-point for OS even if anti-angiogenic agents are used.

Cisplatin has been largely used in the treatment of advanced, unresectable gastric cancer, mainly in combinations with fluoropyrimidines and anthracyclines. Oxaliplatin has been shown to be at least as effective as cisplatin for this disease, but with less toxicity and a better tolerability profile, especially for older patients. We performed a systematic review of the literature to address and quantify differences in the efficacy and the safety between oxaliplatin and cisplatin for the treatment of this disease. The literature was searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing oxaliplatin to cisplatin. Odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to analyze dichotomous variables. Hazard ratios (HRs) for progression and death were combined with an inverse variance method based on logarithmic conversion. A fixed effect model and Mantel–Haenszel’s (M-H) method were used. Heterogeneity was tested with the Q test and the I 2 value. Sensitivity analyses were performed. Three RCTs were identified, involving a total of 1294 patients. Oxaliplatin significantly improved progression-free survival (HR = 0.88, p = 0.02) and overall survival (HR = 0.88, p = 0.04). Moreover, it was associated with less neutropenia (OR = 0.53, p

Altered metabolism of cancer first highlighted by Otto Warburg has a long history. Although ignored for a considerable amount of time, it is now receiving substantial attention. We recently published results obtained with a combination of two drugs, lipoic acid and hydroxycitrate, targeting metabolic enzymes particularly affected in cancer: ATP citrate lyase and pyruvate dehydrogenase kinase. This treatment was as efficient as chemotherapy in the three mouse cancer models that were tested. In this work, we asked if our drug combination could be used in conjunction with standard cytotoxic chemotherapy, in particular cisplatin, to improve basic protocol efficacy. A combination of lipoic acid and hydroxycitrate was administered to mice implanted with syngeneic cancer cells, LL/2 lung carcinoma and MBT-2 bladder carcinoma, concommitantly with classical chemotherapy (cisplatin or methotrexate). We demonstrate that the triple combination lipoic acid + hydroxycitrate + cisplatin or methotrexate is more efficient than cisplatin or methotrexate used individually or the combination of lipoic acid and hydroxycitrate administered alone. Of particular note are the results obtained in the treatment of an 80 year-old female who presented with ductal adenocarcinoma of the pancreas accompanied by liver metastases. A treatment course using gemcitabine plus α-lipoic acid and hydroxycitrate gave highly promising results. The in vivo data, coupled with the case study results, suggest a possible advantage in using a treatment targeted at cancer metabolism in association with classical chemotherapy.

Background Capecitabine is an oral fluoropyrimidine that is shown to have similar efficacy to 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) when used both alone and in combination with oxaliplatin in the treatment of colorectal cancer (CRC). Capecitabine and irinotecan combinations (XELIRI) have been developed for the treatment of this disease but randomized comparisons with standard infusional 5-FU and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) showed conflicting results. Patients and Methods We searched the literature for randomized controlled trials comparing XELIRI to FOLFIRI for the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals were used to analyze dichotomous variables. Hazard ratios for progression and death were combined with an inverse variance method based on logarithmic conversion. The fixed-effect model and Mantel-Haenszel method were used. Heterogeneity was investigated with the Q-test and I 2 . Sensitivity analyses were performed. Results Only 3 studies were identified, involving a total of 450 patients. XELIRI was associated with significantly shorter progression-free survival (PFS) and increased grade 3/4 gastrointestinal toxicities such as nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. Severe neutropenia, however, was significantly more frequent with FOLFIRI. No differences in responses and febrile neutropenia events were observed. Conclusion Our analysis suggest that the 2 regimens are not equivalent. XELIRI remains an option for the first-line treatment of metastatic CRC but FOLFIRI should be preferred as it confers more benefits in terms of PFS and induces fewer GI toxicities.

394 Background: FOLFIRINOX achieved a significant step forward in the treatment of mPC. However, patient prognosis remains dismal, and better discrimination of outcomes could be useful to guide clinical decision-making and patient stratification. We aimed at developing and validating a prognostic model and nomogram able to predict the risk of early death (within 6 months post-treatment initiation) in mPC pts treated with first-line FOLFIRINOX. Methods: Data from 137 mPC treated with the GONO FOLFOXIRI schedule at a single institution were used as developing set. Univariate associations with death in the first 6 months after treatment initiation were investigated. Based on the multivariate model, a nomogram was developed assigning points equal to its weighted relevance to each significant variable. The nomogram was externally validated on an independent, parallel cohort of 206 mPC pts treated with FOLFIRINOX at different Italian and French centers. Predictive ability was assessed with the concordance index (C-index) and visual inspection of the calibration plot. Results: 4 out of the 27 considered variables were retained in the multivariable model: ECOG performance status (PS), neutrophils-to-lymphocytes ratio (NLR), liver metastases, and basal serum CA19.9. The nomogram demonstrated adequate discriminative ability in the validation set with a C-index of 0.754. When grouped in different prognostic categories (according to none, 1, 2, or > 2 risk factors), pts included in our study showed significantly different outcomes with median OS ranging from 6.2 ( > 2 risk factors) to 19.5 months (no risk factors, P < 0.05). Conclusions: PS, NLR, liver metastasis, and CA19.9 were the major determinants of 6-month OS. Our nomogram may help clinicians in discussing with pts the benefits and risks of therapy, and in designing future clinical trials. A visual format of the nomogram will be presented. [Table: see text]

The effects of anticancer chemotherapy on antigen-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) are mostly unknown. We tested the effects of cytotoxic drugs such as 5-fluorouracil, gemcitabine, and oxaliplatin on the functional activity of antigen-specific CTL cultures derived from the peripheral blood mononuclear cells of human donors. We found that a biweekly drug-exposure of human HLA-A(*)02.01+ CTLs derived from bulk cultures led to completely different effects if occurring early (day second) or late (day thirteenth) after the in vitro stimulations with the cognate peptides. In the first case, there was a significant CTL inhibition, whereas in the second, there was a marked enhancement of the antigen-specific cytolytic activity. Results of immunocytofluorimetric studies and CTL/natural killer inhibition assays suggested that the latter effect could be related to a more selective drug-mediated inhibition of cohabitant T regulatory (reg) cells. These results were translated in an in vivo therapeutic mouse model where humanized HLA-A(*)02.01 transgenic mice inoculated with EL-4/humanized HLA-A(*)02.01 transgenic mice showed a prolonged survival and the greatest rate of cure when receiving a combined treatment with a thymidylate synthase-specific peptide vaccine and a multidrug chemotherapy regimen administered late after immunization. Tumor samples derived from this group of mice showed a reduced expression of the target thymidylate synthase antigen, a marked reduction of T(reg)s, and a noteworthy infiltration of C8+ T cells. These results may have clinical implications for the design of new translational anticancer regimens aimed at combining chemotherapy and immunotherapy.

Aim: EMA licensed eribulin mesylate in 2011 for women with advanced breast cancer already treated with at least two lines of chemotherapy, including anthracyclines and taxanes. Azienda Sanitaria Firenze experience is reported to assess the efficacy and safety of eribulin in the real-life setting. Patients & methods: Eribulin was infused as per indication. All women treated in the last 2 years were reviewed. Results: A total of 27 women received eribulin. All but one was pretreated with anthracyclines, 97% with taxanes and 87% with capecitabine. Median age was 63 years (range: 27–80). A median of four cycles of eribulin were infused (range: 2–10). Overall response rate was 30% with a 45% of clinical benefit (response plus stable disease for at least 24 weeks). Toxicities have been as expected. Severe toxicities were rare, with one patient experiencing sepsis and 18% developing grade 3 asthenia. Conclusion: Eribulin maintains its activity out of clinical trials, without unexpected toxicities.

e15719 Background: After the intensification of first-line treatment in metastatic PC the number of patients fit and able to receive a SL treatment is increasing; despite these results, the choice of SL chemotherapy remains a challenging issue. The role of OXA in SL setting has given conflicting results in CONKO-003 and PANCREOX trials; the reasons of this inconsistency are difficult to understand. Methods: In order to detect a possible advantage from the use of oxaliplatin in SL, we pooled together the results of randomized phase II/III studies adding OXA to fluoropyrimidines after a gemcitabine-based first-line. Hazard ratios (HRs) for progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were extracted, while the number of events was used for RR to determine odds ratio (OR) with corresponding 95%CIs. Fixed-effect and random-effect models were used as appropriate, on the basis of the evidence of a non-significant or significant heterogeneity among trials, respectively. The Review Manager software was used (version 5.3). Results: Three studies were identified; main characteristics and results are summarized in the table. No benefit in overall survival derived from the use of OXA (HR 1.03, 95% CI, 0.64-1.67; p=0.90) but significant heterogeneity was reported (p=0.003); the addition of OXA produced a significant benefit in terms of PFS (HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.68-0.97; p=0.02) with a higher chance of response (OR 1.81, 95% CI 1.01-3.24; P=0.05). Interestingly heterogeneity between trials was less evident in PFS and RR than in OS suggesting that this could be a confounding element in the interpretation of data. Conclusions: The reasons of conflicting results concerning the use of oxaliplatin doublets in SL setting are not clear. Given the recent advances in first-line setting, it would be interesting to identify an optimal sequential strategy, hopefully in a personalized approach. [Table: see text]

Imatinib mesylate (IM) is a very important drug in the treatment of gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) and chronic myeloid leukaemia (CML). In large clinical trials conducted until now it demonstrated a good cardiac safety profile. However during the last years many reports indicated a possible IM-induced cardiotoxicity. Here we report a case of a patient with a GIST who developed a severe and irreversible cardiac failure during IM treatment. Interestingly, she suffered from chronic renal failure, a condition that does not contraindicate treatment. Our opinion is that IM-induced cardiotoxicity could be facilitated by the presence of relevant comorbidities such as pre-existing cardiovascular disease or renal failure, commonly present in daily practice but excluded from clinical trials. Phase IV studies are needed to address the question of the real incidence of IM-induced cardiotoxicity in the general population.

Medizinische Ansatze zur Krebsbehandlung und vornehmlich die Strahlen- und Chemotherapie basieren nahezu ausschlieslich auf Wirkstoffen, die Zellen vernichten. Das Hauptproblem der aktuellen Behandlungsmethoden besteht jedoch darin, dass diese nicht spezifisch nur Krebszellen angreifen. Bei den Zytostatika macht vor allem die konstante und kontinuierliche Vermehrung vieler Krebszellen die Krebszellen anfalliger fur eine Vernichtung als normale Zellen. Bei der Strahlentherapie wird eine gewisse Spezifizitat durch die lokale Begrenzung der Bestrahlung auf den Tumor und das unmittelbar umgebende gesunde Gewebe erreicht. Beide Behandlungsmethoden sind jedoch durch ihre toxische Wirkung auf normale Zellen eingeschrankt.

Metastases to the liver receive most of their blood supply from the arterial route, therefore for patients with hepatic metastases from large bowel cancer, hepatic arterial infusion adopting drug-eluting beads preloaded with irinotecan (DEBIRI) may offer a chance of cure.In a multi-institutional study, 74 patients were randomly assigned to receive DEBIRI (36) versus systemic irinotecan, fluorouracil and leucovorin (FOLFIRI, 38). The primary end-point was survival; secondary end points were response, recurrence, toxicity, quality of life, cost and influence of molecular markers.At 50 months, overall survival was significantly longer for patients treated with DEBIRI than for those treated with FOLFIRI (p=0.031, log-rank). Median survival was 22 (95% Confidence Interval CI=21-23) months, for DEBIRI and 15 (95% CI=12-18) months for FOLFIRI. Progression-free survival was 7 (95% CI=3-11) months in the DEBIRI group compared to 4 (95% CI=3-5) months in the FOLFIRI group and the difference between groups was statistically significant (p=0.006, log-rank). Extrahepatic progression had occurred in all patients by the end of the study, at a median time of 13 (95% CI=10-16) months in the DEBIRI group compared to 9 (95% CI 5-13) months in the FOLFIRI group. A statistically significant difference between groups was not observed (p=0.064, log-rank).The median time for duration of improvement to quality of life was 8 (95% CI=3-13) months in the DEBIRI group and 3 (95% CI=2-4) months in the FOLFIRI group. The difference in duration of improvement was statistically significant (p=0.00002, log-rank).This study showed a statistically significant difference between DEBIRI and FOLFIRI for overall survival (7 months), progression-free survival (3 months) and quality of life (5 months). In addition, a clinically significant improvement in time to extrahepatic progression (4 months) was observed for DEBIRI, a reversal of the expectation for a regional treatment. This suggests a benefit of DEBIRI treatment over standard chemotherapy and serves to establish the expected difference between these two treatment options for planning future large randomized studies.

Tumor hypoxia is the condition where cancer cells have been deprived of oxygen. As a tumor grows, it rapidly outgrows its blood supply, leaving portions of the tumor with regions where the oxygen concentration is significantly lower than in healthy tissues. Hypoxic tumor cells are usually resistant to chemotherapy and radiotherapy, but they can be made more susceptible to treatment by increasing the amount of oxygen in them. Cancer physiology can be a new significant target for therapy.

Colorectal cancer is one of the most significant health emerging problem in western countries. Patients with colorectal cancer have liver metastases at presentation in about 25% of cases and another 50% will develop liver recurrence within the next 5 years. Intra-arterial hepatic chemoembolization (TACE) could be a new therapeutic opportunity in the treatment of unresectable or chemorefractory metastases.Since November 2005 we performed a clinical trial of TACE with irinotecan-eluting beads (DEBIRI) in 20 patients affected by liver metastases from colorectal cancer as palliative setting. We developed an intensive treatment with intra-arterial lidocaine and post-procedure supportive therapy to reduce acute toxic effectsWe observed a high response rate (80%), with reduction of lesional contrast enhancement in all responding patients. Due to the supportive treatment, TACE was well tolerated by most patients with a median duration of hospitalization of 3 days (range 1-10). The most important adverse event was abdominal pain. Supportive treatment with antibiotic and antiemetic prophylaxis, and intravenous hydratation is strictly necessary until stabilization of serum levels of transaminases and to prevent infections. Major analgesic as morphine and intra-arterial lidocaine must be used before the procedure.Our results suggest that TACE using DEBIRI feasible in pretreated patients with liver metastases from CRC adopting an adequate supportive therapy to reduce side effects.

Hypoxia characterizing tumour milieu and represents a key aspect in tumor progression and response to treatment. Many researchers are evaluating the differences between normal and neoplastic cells at biomolecular properties. The physiology of tumours is substantially different from that of normal tissues from which we have a unique and selective target for cancer treatment.

Purpose: GOLFIG chemoimmunotherapy regimen proved to be a safe and very active chemoimmunotherapy regimen in advanced colon cancer patients. We have thus investigated the immunobiological feedback to the treatment and its possible correlation with the clinical outcome of these patients. Experimental Design: This clinical and immunologic study involved 46 patients, 27 males and 19 females, enrolled in the GOLFIG-1 phase II trial who received gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 15), oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2 on days 2 and 16), levofolinic acid (100 mg/m2 on days 1, 2, 15, and 16), and 5-fluorouracil (400 mg/m2 as a bolus, and 800 mg/m2 as a 24-hour infusion on days 1, 2, 15, and 16) followed by s.c. granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (100 μg, on days 3-7) and interleukin 2 (0.5 × 106 IU twice a day on days 8-14 and 17-29). Results: The regimen was confirmed to be safe and very active in pretreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. A subgroup analysis of these patients revealed a prolonged time to progression and survival in six patients who developed late signs of autoimmunity. A multivariate analysis validated the occurrence of autoimmunity signs as an independent predictor of favorable outcome. A parallel immunologic study detected in the peripheral blood mononuclear cells of these patients a progressive increase in lymphocyte and eosinophil counts, amplification in central memory, a marked depletion of immunosuppressive regulatory T cells, and activation of colon cancer–specific cytotoxic T cells. Conclusions: Our results suggest that immunity feedback to GOLFIG regimen and its antitumor activity are tightly correlated.

14542 Background: A multi-center phase II trial has been designed to evaluate toxicity, anti-tumour and immune-biological activity of the bio-chemotherapy GOLFIG regimen in advanced colorectal cancer (A-CRC). Methods: The trial involved 46 patients (34/46 2nd line or more). The biweekly GOLFIG regimen consisted of gemcitabine (1,000 mg/m2, day 1), oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2, day 2), levofolinic acid (100 mg /m2, day 1,2) and 5-FU (400 mg/m2 as a bolus, and 800 mg/m2 as 24 hour infusion, days 1,2) followed by sc GM-CSF (100 μg, days 3 to 8) and sc IL-2 (0.5 X 106 IUs twice a day, days 9 to 14). Results: GOLFIG regimen was well tolerated and resulted very active (ORR = 56.5%; disease control = 91.3%), fulfilling the pre-selected (40–60%) target of activity, with a promising TTP [12.26 months, 95% CI; 9.2–15.2 mo.] and OS [18.76 months, 95% CI; 15.2–22.3 mo.]. We detected a significant rise in lymphocyte number and colon cancer-specific cytotoxic T cells (CTLs) paralleled by a reduction in suppressive T-regulatory CD4+CD25+ FoxP3+ lymphocytes -Treg. Self-limiting autoimmunity (AI) occurred in 6 (14%) patients. 1 patient developed cutaneous lesions, with pathological diagnosis of Discoid Lupus Erythematosus (DLE), while 5 other presented a mono / oligoarticular arthritis mainly localized at the knees, elbows, shoulders and fingers with signs of synovitis (pain and swelling) paralleled by a significant increase of inflammatory markers (ESR, C-RP and rheumatoid factor). Subgroup analysis disclosed a mean time to progression of 23.8 months (95% CI; 12.1–35.56 mo.) and an overall survival of 31.83 months (95% CI; 19.9–43.7 mo.) in the 6 AI patients, significantly longer than in patients who did not develop AI [TTP and OS respectively 10.52 (95% CI; 7.7–13.3) and 16.8 months (95% CI; 13.3–20.2)], P ≤ 0.0039 and 0.0080. 5/6 AI patients are still alive and 3 have so far achieved a survival of 37, 41 and 50 months. Conclusions: The GOLFIG regimen exerts immunological and anti-tumour activity and has manageable toxicity in A-CRC. The occurrence of AI is predictive of a favourable outcome. These results provided the rationale for a presently ongoing phase III trial aimed to compare the efficacy of GOLFIG vs. FOLFOX-4 regimen as first line treatment in A- CRC patients. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

3587 We have recently described a poly-chemotherapy (GOLF) regimen that: A) is active in colon carcinoma patients as second line of therapy; B) induces high levels of necrosis and apoptosis in colon cancer cells; C) up-regulates the expression and release of heat shock proteins (HSP)-70 and -90 and tumour-associated antigens (2,3); and D) down-regulates tumour cell resistance to the death signals of cytotoxic-T-lymphocytes.These effects represented the rationale for projecting GOLFIG regimen. Here we describe the results of a multi-center translational phase II trial designed to evaluate the toxicity, anti-tumour activity of a novel regimen designated as GOLFIG-1, composed by the GOLF poly-chemotherapy followed by the subcutaneous (sc.) administration of GM-CSF and low-dose IL-2 in colorectal carcinoma patients. The study involved 37 patients (21M and 16F, mean age 62.5 years), 24 of whom had received a previous line of treatment, and 24 had liver involvement. All the patients received biweekly chemotherapy with gemcitabine (1g/m2, day 1 and 15), oxaliplatin (85 mg/m2, day 2 and 16), levo-folinic acid (100 mg /m2, day 1, 2, 15, 16) and 5-Fluorouracil (400 mg/m2 as a bolus, and 800 mg/m2 as 24 hour infusion, days 1, 2, 15, 16). These patients also received sc GM-CSF (100 μg, day 3 to 8) followed by sc IL-2 (0.5 X 106 IUs twice a day from day 9 to 14 and from 17 to 29). The treatment was well tolerated and very active in colon carcinoma patients, with high objective response (64.9%) and disease control rates (97.3%), with an average time to progression of 12.94 months (CI 95%: 9.98–15.91). An immunological study confirmed the immunological response to colon carcinoma antigen, a significant reduction in suppressive regulatory T lymphocytes (CD4+CD25+T-reg) and a significant reduction of VEGF levels reported in a previous study. In conclusion, these results suggest that the GOLFIG regimen exerts strong immunological and anti-tumour activity in colorectal cancer patients. A randomized phase III trials aimed to compare the efficacy of GOLFIG-1 with FOLFOX-4 regimen in patients with advanced colorectal carcinoma is presently ongoing. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Gemcitabine, oxaliplatin, leucovorin, and 5-fluorouracil (GOLF) is a novel multidrug regimen inducing high levels of necrosis and apoptosis in colon carcinoma cells. This regimen is also able to promote a process of Ag remodeling including up-regulation of immunotherapy targets like carcinoembryonic Ag (CEA), thymidylate synthase (TS). We have conducted a preclinical study aimed to investigate whether these drug-induced modifications would also enhance colon cancer cell immunogenicity. Several CTL lines were thus generated by in vitro stimulating human HLA-A(*)02.01+ PBMCs, from normal donors and colon cancer patients, with autologous dendritic cells cross-primed with cell lysates of colon cancer cells untreated, irradiated, or previously exposed to different drug treatments including the GOLF regimen. Class I HLA-restricted cytolytic activity of these CTL lines was tested against colon cancer cells and CEA and TS gene transfected target cells. These experiments revealed that CTLs sensitized with GOLF-treated cancer cells were much more effective than those sensitized with the untreated colon carcinoma cells or those exposed to the other treatments. CTL lines sensitized against the GOLF-treated colon cancer cells, also expressed a greater percentage of T-lymphocyte precursors able to recognize TS- and CEA-derived peptides. These results suggest that GOLF regimen is a powerful antitumor and immunomodulating regimen that can make the tumor cells a suitable means to induce an Ag-specific CTL response. These results suggest that a rationale combination of GOLF chemotherapy with cytokine-based immunotherapy could generate a chemotherapy-modulated Ag-specific T-lymphocyte response in cancer patients able to destroy the residual disease survived to the cytotoxic drugs.

We have performed a translational phase II trial testing an original immunotherapy schedule based on the monthly subcutaneous (s.c.) administration of hrGM-CSF (days 1 through 5) and very low dose hrIL-2 (days 6 through 15) in 19 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Bone pain, first dose reaction to GM-CSF, asthenia and fever were the most common side effects. A partial response, and a disease stabilization were respectively observed in 4 and 11 cases, with a rate of objective response and a disease control rate respectively of 21% and 79%. We recorded a time to progression of 9 months and a 2- and 3-year survival respectively of 42% (8/19 patients) and 26% (5/19 patients). Our results suggest that this GM-CSF/hrIL-2 combination is active and well tolerated in patients with renal cell carcinoma and deserves to be investigated in larger comparative trials.