Search

Submit Manuscript | http://medcraveonline.com from the premise that the real expert of a situation is the person himself. Use narrative pediatric practice is taken into account that the child’s identity is made of multiple stories, influencing his life: he tells those and those others tell or told about him. It is based on the ability of each to make from his early childhood and permanently stories to make sense of everything that happens to him. The bricks of these stories are his family culture, social, education, experiences, beliefs, everything that was said about him. They can help prevent or achieve what is important to him. Some stories take up so much space that they become “absolute truths” that enclose life its owner. Still other stories are always possible [5]. Make a detour by Australia of 80 years; the original population, known for its artistic tradition, suffered for decades of a double genocide: nearly all of Aborigines was eliminated physically, and what remained of the communities, children were taken from their families and placed among the settlers to be “assimilated”. Since then, these communities have declined (alcohol and drugs, violence, schooling, etc.). Psychologists and therapists whites were asked to come to their aid. Among them, Michael White [3], formed in Brief Therapy Center in Palo Alto, has an original approach, reported by Dina Scherrer [6] explaining the Aborigines: “We were asked to help solve the problems we have created. Anything we can do to help you is to ask you to explain how you think the world and look into your culture and your traditions that 50,000 years ago the solutions that have been developed to solve your problems. This humble posture Mickael White face of Aborigines is the foundation of Narratives practices developed in the AngloSaxon countries for over 30 years. They were introduced in France since 2004 when they begin to be taught at the University. How is this idea that the other has in him the resources to develop “stories” that will make it harder is it relevant in pediatrics?

Introduction: the ASALÉE association is a medical cooperation device already used and evaluated in general medicine. The number of independent paediatricians who are less and less numerous but still have multiple missions could benefit from such a system. This is why we were interested in the first paediatric medical cooperation system within ASALÉE. The main objective was to describe this new system. Our secondary objective was to evaluate the benefit of this system for patients and their families. Material and methods: we carried out a descriptive unicentric observational study over 6 months including consecutively and without exclusion criteria all the patients seen in consultation by the paediatric nurse and collected data concerning the patients, their families and consultations. We also questioned the families by a questionnaire to understand the benefits of these consultations. Results: 234 patients were included. 61.1% of the patients in the study are less than 1 year old. The 2 most common reasons for consultation were "care for newborns and infants" and "parental support". 65.9% of patients referred by paediatricians came to the consultation. The response rate to the questionnaire was 49% with 99% of positive responses concerning families feedback on this system. Discussion: this study describes an innovative and topical concept in liberal paediatrics which would require other types of studies in order to be evaluated in its entirety but which could conceivably be extended to other territories., Introduction : l’association ASALÉE est un dispositif de coopération médicale déjà utilisé et évalué en médecine générale. Les pédiatres libéraux de moins en moins nombreux mais ayant toujours des missions multiples pourraient bénéficier d’un tel dispositif. C’est pourquoi nous nous sommes intéressés au premier dispositif de coopération médicale pédiatrique au sein d’ASALÉE. L’objectif principal était la description de ce nouveau dispositif. Notre objectif secondaire était d’évaluer le bénéfice de ce dispositif pour les patients et leur famille. Matériel et méthodes : nous avons réalisé une étude observationnelle descriptive unicentrique sur 6 mois en incluant de manière consécutive et sans critère d’exclusion tous les patients vus en consultation par la puéricultrice et avons recueilli des données concernant les patients, leur famille et les consultations. Nous avons également interrogé les familles au travers d’un questionnaire afin d’appréhender le bénéfice apporté par ces consultations. Résultats : 234 patients ont été inclus. 61.1% des patients de l’étude ont moins de 1 an. Les 2 motifs de consultation les plus représentés sont « soins aux NN et nourrissons » et « soutien parental ». 65.9% des patients adressés par les pédiatres sont venus à la consultation. Le taux de réponse au questionnaire était de 49% avec 99% de réponses positives concernant le retour des familles sur ce système. Discussion : cette étude décrit un concept innovant et d’actualité en pédiatrie libérale qui nécessiterait d’autres types d’études afin d’être évalué dans sa globalité mais que l’on peut imaginer être étendu à d’autres territoires.