Search

Background: Rituximab and lenalidomide is a preferred option for relapsed indolent B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Obinutuzumab may be a superior combination partner with lenalidomide given enhanced antibody dependent cellular cytotoxicity and phagocytosis compared to rituximab. Our aim was to determine the recommended phase 2 dose, safety, and activity of lenalidomide in combination with fixed dose of obinutuzumab in relapsed and refractory indolent B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma., Methods: In this single-arm, open-label, phase 1/2 trial, we enrolled patients with relapsed or refractory WHO Grade 1-3A follicular lymphoma, marginal zone lymphoma and small lymphocytic lymphoma and adequate performance status (ECOG 0-2) at the MD Anderson Cancer Center. We excluded patients with evidence of ongoing transformation to aggressive lymphoma. During phase 1, 1000 mg intravenous obinutuzumab was administered with three predefined levels of oral lenalidomide in a 3 + 3 dose escalation design to establish lenalidomide 20 mg as the recommended phase 2 dose. During phase 2, patients received induction therapy with six 28-day cycles of lenalidomide 20 mg with intravenous obinutuzumab 1000 mg. In accordance with our prior experience with lenalidomide plus rituximab, patients who were responding to the combination could receive up to 6 additional cycles (up to 12 cycles in total) of combination therapy. Dosing of obinutuzumab was continued in all responding patients after cycle 6 every 2 months for a total of 30 months from the start of therapy. The decision of number of cycles of combination therapy beyond 6 was at discretion of the investigator and was included to allow individualisation of therapy to maximise response while minimising exposure. The co-primary objectives were to evaluate the safety and overall response, defined as the proportion of patients who achieved a complete or partial response in relapsed and refractory indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma at the end of induction therapy, according to Cheson and colleagues (2007 criteria). The secondary endpoints were complete response after induction therapy and time to event endpoints including time to progression, progression free survival, and overall survival. Analyses were intent to treat in the efficacy cohort and per-treated in the safety population in all patients who received at least one dose of either investigational agent. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01995669., Findings: Between June 03, 2014, and 07 March 2019, we completed planned enrolment, and 66 patients started therapy including 9 patients in phase 1 and 57 patients in phase 2. All patients were evaluated for safety and the 60 patients treated at the recommended phase 2 dose of lenalidomide 20 mg were evaluable for activity. Grade 3-4 haematological toxicities included neutropenia 21% (14/66) and thrombocytopenia 11% (7/66) with no cases of febrile neutropenia. Grade 3-4 non-haematological toxicities included lung infection 8% (5/66), fatigue 8% (5/66) and rash 6% (4/66). By Cheson 2007 criteria, 90% (54/60, 95% CI: 79-96) achieved an overall response at the end of induction meeting the prespecified activity endpoint. Complete responses were seen in 33% (20/60, 95% CI: 22-47) at the end of induction. Median progression free survival, time to progression and overall survival have not been reached after median follow-up of 41.7 months. Estimated 4-year progression free survival rates were 55% (95% CI: 42-73), time to progression of 56% (95% CI: 43-74) and overall survival of 84% (95% CI: 74-95)., Interpretation: Our findings suggest that oral lenalidomide with obinutuzumab is safe and highly active in patients with relapsed and refractory indolent B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma and is associated with prolonged remission duration. The study is limited by the lack of a control arm leading to cross-trial comparisons to evaluate activity. Future randomised trials comparing this regime to rituximab and lenalidomide are warranted., Funding: Genentech and an MD Anderson Core grant., Competing Interests: AG: Received honorarium for participation in advisory board for Kite Pharma. CKC: has received honorarium for participation in advisory boards with Kite/Gilead. LF: No competing interests. NF: has received research support from Celgene for undertaking the preclinical and clinical trials of lenalidomide. PS: consultancy for Kite, a Gilead Company, Roche-Genentech, Hutchinson MediPharma, ADC Therapeutics, Incyte Morphosis and TG Therapeutics; research funding from Sobi Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca-Acerta, ALX Oncology, and ADC Therapeutics. Research: Salary support from the Leukemia Lymphoma Society Scholar in Clinical Research Career Development Program, the Sabin Fellowship Award, and by Gilead Scholar in Clinical Research Award. FJH: No competing interests. LEF: No competing interests. JRW: Consulting and Research Funding—BMS ADC Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Genentech, Kite, Janssen, Kymera, Merck, Morphosys/Incyte, Novartis. Consulting: Abbvie, GenMab, Regeneron, and SeaGen. CO: No competing interests. JA: No competing interests. RN: Consulting–Abbvie, Incyte. Honorarium for Educational Events—AstraZeneca, ScienciaCME, MedPage, Curio Science. Travel Support for Attending Meetings–Viracta Therapeutics, Inc. Studio E.R. Congressi s.r.l. World Health Communications, Ltd. RES: Grants–Seagen, BMS, GSK and Rafael Pharmaceuticals. SSN—has received research support from Kite/Gilead, Cellectis, Poseida, Merk, Acerta, Karus, BMS, Unum Therapeutics, Allogene, and Precision Biosciences; served as consultant and advisory board member for Kite/Gliead, Celgene, Novartis, Unum Therapeutics, Pfizer, Merck, Precision Biosciences, Cell Medica, Incyte, Allogene, Calibr, and Legend Biotech; has patents related to cell therapy. CF: Consultant: Abbvie, Bayer, BeiGene, Celgene, Denovo Biopharma, Foresight Diagnostics, Genentech/Roche, Genmab, Gilead, Karyopharm, N-Power Medicine, Pharmacyclics/Janssen, SeaGen, Spectrum. Stock Options: Foresight Diagnostics, N-Power MedicineResearch Funding: 4D, Abbvie, Acerta, Adaptimmune, Allogene, Amgen, Bayer, Celgene, Cellectis EMD, Gilead, Genentech/Roche, Guardant, Iovance, Janssen Pharmaceutical, Kite, Morphosys, Nektar, Novartis, Pfizer, Pharmacyclics, Sanofi, Takeda, TG Therapeutics, Xencor, Ziopharm, Burroughs Wellcome Fund, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, National Cancer Institute, V Foundation, Leukemia and Lymphoma Sociery, Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas: CPRIT Scholar in Cancer Research. LJN: has received honorarium for participation in advisory boards/consulting from Abbvie, ADC Therapeutics, BMS/Celgene, Caribou Biosciences, Daiichi Sankyo, Epizyme, Genentech/Roche, Genmab, Janssen, Incyte, Ipsen, Novartis, and Takeda; research support from BMS/Celgene, Caribou Biosciences, Daiichi Sankyo, Epizyme, Genentech/Roche, Genmab, Gilead/Kite, IGM Biosciences, Ipsen, Janssen, Novartis, and Takeda., (© 2024 The Authors.)

Patients with follicular lymphoma, an indolent form of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, typically experience multiple relapses over their disease course. Periods of remission become progressively shorter with worse clinical outcomes after each subsequent line of therapy. Currently, no clear standard of care/preferred treatment approach exists for patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma. As novel agents continue to emerge for treatment in the third-line setting, guidance is needed for selecting the most appropriate therapy for each patient. Several classes of targeted therapeutic agents, including monoclonal antibodies, phosphoinositide 3-kinase inhibitors, enhancer of zeste homolog 2 inhibitors, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies, and bispecific antibodies, have been approved by regulatory authorities based on clinical benefit in patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma. Additionally, antibody-drug conjugates and other immunocellular therapies are being evaluated in this setting. Effective integration of CAR-T cell therapy into the treatment paradigm after two or more prior therapies requires appropriate patient selection based on transformation status following a rebiopsy; a risk evaluation based on age, fitness, and remission length; and eligibility for CAR-T cell therapy. Consideration of important logistical factors (e.g., proximity to the treatment center and caregiver support during key periods of CAR-T cell therapy) is also critical. Overall, an individualized treatment plan that considers patient-related factors (e.g., age, disease status, tumor burden, comorbidities) and prior treatment types is recommended for patients with relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma. Future analyses of real-world data and a better understanding of mechanisms of relapse are needed to further refine patient selection and identify optimal sequencing of therapies in this setting., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)

Abstract: Tisagenlecleucel is approved for adults with relapsed/refractory (r/r) follicular lymphoma (FL) in the third- or later-line setting. The primary analysis (median follow-up, 17 months) of the phase 2 ELARA trial reported high response rates and excellent safety profile in patients with extensively pretreated r/r FL. Here, we report longer-term efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetic, and exploratory biomarker analyses after median follow-up of 29 months (interquartile range, 22.2-37.7). As of 29 March 2022, 97 patients with r/r FL (grades 1-3A) received tisagenlecleucel infusion (0.6 × 108-6 × 108 chimeric antigen receptor-positive viable T cells). Bridging chemotherapy was allowed. Baseline clinical factors, tumor microenvironment, blood soluble factors, and circulating blood cells were correlated with clinical response. Cellular kinetics were assessed by quantitative polymerase chain reaction. Median progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DOR), and overall survival (OS) were not reached. Estimated 24-month PFS, DOR, and OS rates in all patients were 57.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 46.2-67), 66.4% (95% CI, 54.3-76), and 87.7% (95% CI, 78.3-93.2), respectively. Complete response rate and overall response rate were 68.1% (95% CI, 57.7-77.3) and 86.2% (95% CI, 77.5-92.4), respectively. No new safety signals or treatment-related deaths were reported. Low levels of tumor-infiltrating LAG3+CD3+ exhausted T cells and higher baseline levels of naïve CD8+ T cells were associated with improved outcomes. Tisagenlecleucel continued to demonstrate highly durable efficacy and a favorable safety profile in this extended follow-up of 29 months in patients with r/r FL enrolled in ELARA. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT03568461., (© 2024 American Society of Hematology. Published by Elsevier Inc. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

Background: Follicular lymphoma (FL) and marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) are indolent non-Hodgkin lymphomas (iNHL). Median survival for iNHL is approximately 20 years. Because standard treatments are not curative, patients often receive multiple lines of therapy with associated toxicity-rationally designed, combination therapies with curative potential are needed. The immunomodulatory drug lenalidomide was evaluated in combination with rituximab for the frontline treatment of FL in the phase 3 RELEVANCE study. Ibrutinib, an oral Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor, is active in NHL and was evaluated in combination with lenalidomide, rituximab, and ibrutinib (IRR) in a phase 1 study., Methods: The authors conducted an open-label, phase 2 clinical trial of IRR for previously untreated FL and MZL. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) at 24 months., Results: This study included 48 participants with previously untreated FL grade 1-3a (N = 38), or MZL (N = 10). Participants received 12, 28-day cycles of lenalidomide (15 mg, days 1-21 cycle 1; 20 mg, cycles 2-12), rituximab (375 mg/m 2 weekly in cycle 1; day 1 cycles 2-12), and ibrutinib 560 mg daily. With a median follow-up of 65.3 months, the estimated PFS at 24 months was 78.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 68.0%-91.4%) and 60-month PFS was 59.7% (95% CI, 46.6%-76.4%). One death occurred unrelated to disease progression. Grade 3-4 adverse events were observed in 64.6%, including 50% with grade 3-4 rash., Conclusions: IRR is highly active as frontline therapy for FL and MZL. Compared to historical results with lenalidomide and rituximab, PFS is similar with higher grade 3-4 toxicity, particularly rash. The study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02532257)., (© 2023 American Cancer Society.)

Autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR T) therapy is highly effective in relapsed/refractory large B cell lymphoma (rrLBCL) but is associated with toxicities that delay recovery. While the biological mechanisms of cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicity have been investigated, the pathophysiology is poorly understood for prolonged cytopenia, defined as grade ≥3 cytopenia lasting beyond 30 days after CAR T infusion. We performed single-cell RNA sequencing of bone marrow samples from healthy donors and rrLBCL patients with or without prolonged cytopenia and identified significantly increased frequencies of clonally expanded CX3CR1 hi cytotoxic T cells, expressing high interferon (IFN)-γ and cytokine signaling gene sets, associated with prolonged cytopenia. In line with this, we found that hematopoietic stem cells from these patients expressed IFN-γ response signatures. IFN-γ deregulates hematopoietic stem cell self-renewal and differentiation and can be targeted with thrombopoietin agonists or IFN-γ-neutralizing antibodies, highlighting a potential mechanism-based approach for the treatment of CAR T-associated prolonged cytopenia., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests M.R.G. reports research funding from Sanofi, Kite/Gilead, Abbvie, and Allogene; consulting for Abbvie; honoraria/consulting fees from Tessa Therapeutics, Monte Rosa Therapeutics, Daiichi Sankyo, and Abbvie; and stock ownership of KDAc Therapeutics. S.S.N. received research support from Kite/Gilead, BMS, Cellectis, Poseida, Allogene, Unum Therapeutics, Precision Biosciences, and Adicet Bio; served as Advisory Board Member/Consultant for Kite/Gilead, Merck, Novartis, Sellas Life Sciences, Athenex, Allogene, Incyte, Adicet Bio, BMS, Legend Biotech, Bluebird Bio, Fosun Kite, Sana Biotechnology, Caribou, Astellas Pharma, Morphosys, Janssen, Chimagen, ImmunoACT, and Orna Therapeutics; has received royalty income from Takeda Pharmaceuticals; has stock options from Longbow Immunotherapy, Inc; and has intellectual property related to cell therapy. P.S. received research support from Sobi, AstraZeneca/Acerta, ALX Oncology, and ADC Therapeutics; and served as Advisory Board Member/Consultant for Kite/Gilead, Roche/Genentech, Incyte/Morphosys, ADC Therapeutics, TG Therapeutics, Hutchinson/MediPharma, and AstraZeneca/Acerta. R.N. reports speakership for Incyte. J.R.W. reports consulting for Kite/Gilead, BMS, Novartis, Genentech/Roche, AstraZeneca, Morphosys/Incyte, Janssen, ADC Therapeutics, Calithera, Kymera, Merck, MonteRosa, SeaGen, and Abbvie; and research funding from Kite/Gilead, BMS, Novartis, Genentech/Roche, AstraZeneca, Morphosys/Incyte, Janssen, ADC Therapeutics, Calithera, and Kymera. S.A. reports research funding from Seattle Genetics, Merck, Xencor, Chimagen, and Tessa Therapeutics; advisory board membership or consulting for Tessa Therapeutic’s, Chimagen, ADC Therapeutics, and KITE/Gilead; and data safety monitoring board membership for Myeloid Therapeutics. L.J.N. reports honoraria for participation on advisory boards from ADC Therapeutics, Atara, BMS, Caribou Biosciences, Epizyme, Genentech, Genmab, Gilead/Kite, Janssen, Morphosys, Novartis, and Takeda; research support from BMS, Caribou Biosciences, Epizyme, Genentech, Genmab, Gilead/Kite, Janssen, IGM Biosciences, Novartis, and Takeda; and serves on a DSMB for DeNovo, Genentech, MEI, and Takeda. C.R.F. reports consulting for Abbvie, Bayer, BeiGene, Celgene, Denovo Biopharma, Foresight Diagnostics, Genentech/Roche, Genmab, Gilead, Karyopharm, N-Power Medicine, Pharmacyclics/Janssen, SeaGen, and Spectrum; research funding from 4D, Abbvie, Acerta, Adaptimmune, Allogene, Amgen, Bayer, Celgene, Cellectis EMD, Gilead, Genentech/Roche, Guardant, Iovance, Janssen Pharmaceutical, Kite, Morphosys, Nektar, Novartis, Pfizer, Pharmacyclics, Sanofi, Takeda, TG Therapeutics, Xencor, Ziopharm, Burroughs Wellcome Fund, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, National Cancer Institute, V Foundation, and Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas: CPRIT Scholar in Cancer Research; and stock ownership in Foresight Diagnostics, N-Power Medicine. F.V. reports research funding from Allogene and Geron corporation; and honoraria from i3Health, Elsevier, America Registry of Pathology, Society of Hematology Oncology, and CRISP Therapeutics. K.T. reports consulting for Symbio Pharaceuticals and honoraria from Mission Bio. R.E.S. reports research funding from SeaGen, BMS, GSK, and Rafael Pharmaceuticals., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Follicular lymphoma (FL) is generally considered an indolent disease, although patients with relapsing FL experience progressively shorter durations of response to second or later lines of therapy. The ongoing ELARA trial in adult patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) FL treated with tisagenlecleucel demonstrated an overall response rate of 86.2% and a complete response rate of 69.1%, with no treatment-related deaths. Tisagenlecleucel was administered in the outpatient setting in 18% of patients in ELARA; however, there is limited knowledge concerning the impact of inpatient versus outpatient tisagenlecleucel administration on healthcare resource utilization (HCRU) among patients with r/r FL. Here, we present the first HCRU analysis among patients with r/r FL who received tisagenlecleucel in the Phase II, single-arm, multicenter ELARA trial. HCRU was characterized using hospitalization data from day 1 to month 2 after tisagenlecleucel infusion. Information on length of stay, facility use, and discharge was assessed in patients who received tisagenlecleucel in the outpatient or inpatient setting. All costs were inflated to 2020 US dollars. As of August 3, 2021 (20-month median follow-up), 17/97 (18%) r/r FL patients were infused in an outpatient setting. Patients infused in the outpatient setting generally had favorable Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status and Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index scores, and less bulky disease at baseline. However, the outpatients had higher proportions of patients with grade 3A FL, primary refractory disease, and >5 lines of prior therapy compared with inpatients. Forty-one percent of patients treated in the outpatient setting did not require hospitalization within 30 days after infusion, and outpatients who did require hospitalization had a shorter average length of stay compared with inpatients (5 versus 13 days). No outpatients required intensive care unit (ICU) admission, whereas 9% of inpatients were admitted to the ICU. The mean postinfusion hospitalization costs were $7477 and $40,054 in the outpatient and inpatient settings, respectively. Efficacy between both groups was similar. Tisagenlecleucel can be safely administered to some patients in the outpatient setting, which may reduce HCRU for patients with r/r FL., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

The ELARA trial indicates tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel) is an effective anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy for relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma (r/r FL). As ELARA is a single-arm trial, this study compares tisa-cel outcomes from the ELARA trial with usual care from a real-world cohort. ELARA enrolled 98 patients as of 29 March 2021 (median follow-up: 15 months from enrollment). Usual care data were obtained from ReCORD-FL, a global retrospective study of patients with r/r FL, who met similar eligibility criteria to ELARA. With a data cutoff date of 31 December 2020, 187 patients with ≥2 preceding treatment lines were included in the ReCORD-FL (median follow-up: 57 months from third-line) study. An indirect treatment comparison was performed for 97 patients from the ELARA trial and 143 patients from the ReCORD-FL study with no missing data on baseline factors. The line of therapy for which outcomes were assessed was selected or matched between cohorts using propensity score modeling. After baseline factor adjustment via weighting by odds, complete response rate (CRR; 95% confidence interval) was 69.1% (59.8%-78.3%) for tisa-cel vs. 37.3% (26.4%-48.3%) for usual care; overall response rate was 85.6% (78.7%-92.5%) vs. 63.6% (52.5%-74.7%). Kaplan-Meier probability of being progression/event-free at 12 months was 70.5% (61.4%-79.7%) for tisa-cel vs. 51.9% (40.6%-63.3%) for usual care, with hazard ratio (HR)=0.60 (0.34-0.86); 12-month overall survival was 96.6% (92.9%-100%) vs. 71.7% (61.2%-82.2%), with HR=0.2 (0.02-0.38). In conclusion, tisa-cel was associated with a 1.9-fold higher complete response rate and a 1.4-fold higher rate of being progression or event free at 12 months vs usual care, as well as a death risk reduction of 80%. The findings provide additional evidence on the benefit of tisa-cel in patients with r/r FL after ≥2 treatment lines. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT03568461., (© 2022 by The American Society of Hematology. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).)

Background: A significant portion of diabetic macular edema (DME) is refractory to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) agents. This study investigates morphological and functional outcomes to a single intravitreal bevacizumab (IVB) injection in patients with center-involving DME (ciDME) at 4-6 weeks and compares treatment responders and non-responders based on spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) features., Methods: IRB approved observational, retrospective chart review of patients with ciDME, identified by ICD-10 code, who received IVB and underwent baseline and 4-6 weeks follow-up SD-OCT imaging between January 1, 2016 and January 19, 2021. Patients who had received previous treatment with anti-VEGF or intraocular steroids within 1 year were excluded. Variables included best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central subfield thickness (CST) and total macular volume (TMV). Eyes were classified as responders if CST reduction was greater than 10%. OCT scans were graded qualitatively by two masked graders using Imagivault software. Paired Student's t-tests, Wilcoxon signed rank tests and Chi-Square tests were used for analysis., Results: A total of 334 prospective subjects were identified, and after applying exclusion criteria 52 eyes from 46 patients (mean age 64.22 ± 8.12 years, 58.7% male) were included. Mean BCVA did not significantly change with treatment, 63.9 ETDRS letters (~ 20/50) at baseline and 65.9 ETDRS letters (~ 20/50) post-treatment (p = 0.07). Mean CST decreased from 466 ± 123 μm at baseline to 402 ± 86 μm post-treatment (p < 0.001). 22 (42.3%) of eyes were categorized as responders and 30 (57.7%) as non-responders. Average change in CST from baseline in responders was -164 μm (p < 0.001) and + 9 μm in non-responders (p = 0.47). Vitreomacular adhesion (VMA) was more prevalent in non-responders (28.7% vs. 4.8%, p = 0.03). In addition, cyst location in the inner nuclear layer (INL) was present more frequently in responders (95.5% vs. 73.3%, p = 0.037) as was subretinal fluid (45.5% vs. 13.3%, p = 0.01)., Conclusion: The short-term response to a single IVB was sub-optimal with structural but no functional improvements. Greater baseline CST, presence of INL cysts and subretinal fluid may represent factors indicative of a better treatment response., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

FOXM1 is a transcription factor that controls cell cycle regulation, cell proliferation, and differentiation. Overexpression of FOXM1 has been implicated in various cancer types. However, the activation status and functional significance of FOXM1 in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) have not been well investigated. Using proteomic approaches, we discovered that the protein expression levels of FOXM1 and PLK1 were positively correlated in DLBCL cell lines and primary DLBCL. Expression levels of FOXM1 and PLK1 mRNAs were also significantly higher in DLBCL than in normal human B cells and could predict poor prognosis of DLBCL, particularly in patients with germinal center B cell-like (GCB) DLBCL. Furthermore, proteomic studies defined a FOXM1-PLK1 signature that consisted of proteins upstream and downstream of that axis involved in the p38-MAPK-AKT pathway, cell cycle, and DNA damage/repair. Further studies demonstrated a mechanistic function of the FOXM1/PLK1 axis in connection with the DNA damage response pathways regulating the S/G2 checkpoint of the cell cycle. Therapeutic targeting of FOXM1/PLK1 using a FOXM1 or PLK1 inhibitor, as well as other clinically relevant small-molecule inhibitors targeting ATR-CHK1, was highly effective in DLBCL in vitro models. These findings are instrumental for lymphoma drug discovery aiming at the FOXM1/PLK1/ATR/CHK1 axis., Competing Interests: None., (AJCR Copyright © 2022.)

Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported. The RELEVANCE trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01650701) showed that lenalidomide plus rituximab (R 2 ) provided similar efficacy to rituximab plus chemotherapy (R-chemo) in patients with advanced-stage, previously untreated follicular lymphoma (FL). We report the second interim analysis of the RELEVANCE trial after 6 years of follow-up. Patients with previously untreated grade 1-3a FL were assigned 1:1 to R 2 or R-chemo, followed by rituximab maintenance. Coprimary end points were complete response (confirmed/unconfirmed) at week 120 and progression-free survival (PFS). At median follow-up of 72 months, 6-year PFS was 60% and 59% for R 2 and R-chemo, respectively (hazard ratio = 1.03 [95% CI, 0.84 to 1.27]). Six-year overall survival was estimated to be 89% in both groups. Median PFS and overall survival were not reached in either group. Overall response after progression was 61% and 59%, and 5-year estimated survival rate after progression was 69% and 74% in the R 2 and R-chemo groups, respectively. The transformation rate per year in the R 2 and R-chemo groups was 0.68% and 0.45%, and secondary primary malignancies occurred in 11% and 13% ( P = .34), respectively. No new safety signals were observed. R 2 continues to demonstrate comparable, durable efficacy and safety versus R-chemo in previously untreated patients with FL and provides an acceptable chemo-free alternative.

Patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphomas (rrLBCL) can achieve long-term remission after CD19 chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy (CART19). However, more than half of recipients will experience treatment failure. Thus, approaches are needed to identify high-risk patients who may benefit from alternative or consolidative therapy. We evaluated low-pass whole-genome sequencing (lpWGS) of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) before CART19 as a new approach for risk stratification. We performed lpWGS on pretreatment plasma samples from 122 patients at time of leukapheresis who received standard-of-care CART19 for rrLBCL to define DNA copy number alterations (CNAs). In multivariable selection, high focal CNA score (FCS) denoting genomic instability was the most significant pretreatment variable associated with inferior 3-month complete response rates (28% vs 56%, P = .0029), progression-free survival (PFS; P = .0007; hazard ratio, 2.11), and overall survival (OS; P = .0026; hazard ratio, 2.10). We identified 34 unique focal CNAs in 108 (89%) patients; of these, deletion 10q23.3 leading to loss of FAS death receptor was the most highly associated with poor outcomes, leading to inferior PFS (P < .0001; hazard ratio, 3.49) and OS (P = .0027; hazard ratio, 2.68). By combining FCS with traditional markers of increased tumor bulk (elevated lactate dehydrogenase and >1 extranodal site), we built a simple risk model that could reliably risk stratify patients. Thus, lpWGS of cfDNA is a minimally invasive assay that could rapidly identify high-risk patients and may guide patient selection for and targeted therapies to evaluate in future clinical trials., (© 2022 by The American Society of Hematology.)

Limited data exist regarding the outcome of patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) who relapse or progress after frontline lenalidomide and rituximab (R2). Moreover, mechanisms of resistance to R2 in FL remain unclear, with increased protumoral macrophages suspected as a major contributory culprit to this phenomenon. This retrospective study analyzed the outcome of patients with advanced-stage FL grade 1 to 3A who relapsed or progressed after frontline R2. A multiplex immunofluorescence macrophage panel, including CD47, CD14, CD68, CD115 (also known as colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor [CSF1R]), CD163, CD172a (also known as signal regulatory protein α [SIRPα]), and CD274 (also known as programmed cell death-ligand 1 [PDL1]), was used to stain tissue biopsy specimens collected before initiation of R2 and at the time of progression. Among 156 patients with advanced-stage FL treated with frontline R2, 33 (21%) relapsed or progressed and required second-line therapy, after a median of 33 months (range, 1-122 months). Second-line therapy was chemoimmunotherapy in 16 (48%) patients and other therapy in 17 (52%). The overall response rate was 78%, and complete response rate was 72%. Median progression-free survival was significantly longer in patients who received chemoimmunotherapy compared with other therapy (99 vs 25 months; P = .004). Three macrophage populations were significantly increased in tissue samples collected at progression compared with before frontline treatment: CD68+CD115+ (P = .02), CD68+CD115+CD172a+ (P = .02), and CD68+CD163+CD172a+ (P = .01). Chemoimmunotherapy is an effective treatment strategy for patients with FL who relapse after frontline R2. Therapies targeting specific macrophage populations may yield novel approaches for improving outcomes with frontline R2., (© 2022 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (B-NHL) encompasses multiple clinically and phenotypically distinct subtypes of malignancy with unique molecular etiologies. Common subtypes of B-NHL, such as diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, have been comprehensively interrogated at the genomic level, but rarer subtypes, such as mantle cell lymphoma, remain less extensively characterized. Furthermore, multiple B-NHL subtypes have thus far not been comprehensively compared using the same methodology to identify conserved or subtype-specific patterns of genomic alterations. Here, we employed a large targeted hybrid-capture sequencing approach encompassing 380 genes to interrogate the genomic landscapes of 685 B-NHL tumors at high depth, including diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, mantle cell lymphoma, follicular lymphoma, and Burkitt lymphoma. We identified conserved hallmarks of B-NHL that were deregulated in the majority of tumors from each subtype, including frequent genetic deregulation of the ubiquitin proteasome system. In addition, we identified subtype-specific patterns of genetic alterations, including clusters of co-occurring mutations and DNA copy number alterations. The cumulative burden of mutations within a single cluster were more discriminatory of B-NHL subtypes than individual mutations, implicating likely patterns of genetic cooperation that contribute to disease etiology. We therefore provide the first cross-sectional analysis of mutations and DNA copy number alterations across major B-NHL subtypes and a framework of co-occurring genetic alterations that deregulate genetic hallmarks and likely cooperate in lymphomagenesis.

PD-1 blockade enhances the function of antitumor T cells and antibody-dependent, cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC) of NK cells. In a single-center, open-label, phase 2 trial, we tested the combination of pembrolizumab, an anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody, and rituximab, an anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody that induces ADCC, in 30 patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) with rituximab-sensitive disease who had relapsed after ≥1 prior therapy. Pembrolizumab was administered at 200 mg IV every 3 weeks for up to 16 cycles, and rituximab was given at 375 mg/m2 IV weekly for 4 weeks in cycle 1 only. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) were liver enzyme abnormalities (3%), diarrhea (3%), nausea (3%), aseptic meningitis (3%), and pancreatitis (3%). Low-grade immune-related AEs were reported in 80% of patients, including diarrhea (43%), liver enzyme abnormalities (33%), thyroid dysfunction (27%), and rash (23%). Grade 3 or 4 immune-related AEs occurred in 13% of the patients. Treatment-related AEs led to discontinuation in 6 (20%) patients. The overall response rate (primary end point) was 67%, and the complete response (CR) rate was 50%. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.6 months (95% confidence interval, 8.2-27.6), the 3-year overall survival rate was 97%, and 23% of patients were in remission at a median follow-up of 35 months. The presence of a high CD8+ T-effector score at baseline in the tumor was associated with induction of a CR and improved PFS. In this single-arm, phase 2 study, the combination of pembrolizumab and rituximab demonstrates favorable efficacy and safety profile in relapsed FL. This trial is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT02446457., (© 2022 by The American Society of Hematology. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0), permitting only noncommercial, nonderivative use with attribution. All other rights reserved.)

Tisagenlecleucel is an autologous anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor-T cell therapy with clinically meaningful outcomes demonstrated in patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) B-cell lymphoma. In a previous pilot study of tisagenlecleucel in r/r follicular lymphoma (FL), 71% of patients achieved a complete response (CR). Here we report the primary, prespecified interim analysis of the ELARA phase 2 multinational trial of tisagenlecleucel in adults with r/r FL after two or more treatment lines or who relapsed after autologous stem cell transplant (no. NCT03568461). The primary endpoint was CR rate (CRR). Secondary endpoints included overall response rate (ORR), duration of response, progression-free survival, overall survival, pharmacokinetics and safety. As of 29 March 2021, 97/98 enrolled patients received tisagenlecleucel (median follow-up, 16.59 months; interquartile range, 13.8-20.21). The primary endpoint was met. In the efficacy set (n = 94), CRR was 69.1% (95% confidence interval, 58.8-78.3) and ORR 86.2% (95% confidence interval, 77.5-92.4). Within 8 weeks of infusion, rates of cytokine release syndrome were 48.5% (grade ≥3, 0%), neurological events 37.1% (grade ≥3, 3%) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) 4.1% (grade ≥3, 1%) in the safety set (n = 97), with no treatment-related deaths. Tisagenlecleucel is safe and effective in extensively pretreated r/r FL, including in high-risk patients., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc.)

Background: The single-arm DAWN trial (NCT01779791) of ibrutinib monotherapy in patients with relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma (FL) showed an overall response rate (ORR) of 20.9% and a median response duration of 19.4 months. This biomarker analysis of the DAWN dataset sought to determine genetic classifiers for prediction of response to ibrutinib treatment., Methods: Whole exome sequencing was performed on baseline tumor samples. Potential germline variants were excluded; a custom set of 1216 cancer-related genes was examined. Responder- versus nonresponder-associated variants were identified using Fisher's exact test. Classifiers with increasing numbers of genes were created using a greedy algorithm that repeatedly selected genes, adding the most nonresponders to the existing "predicted nonresponders" set and were evaluated with 10-fold cross-validation., Results: Exome data were generated from 88 patient samples and 13,554 somatic mutation variants were inferred. Response data were available for 83 patients (17 responders, 66 nonresponders). Each sample showed 100 to >500 mutated genes, with greater variance across nonresponders. The overall variant pattern was consistent with previous FL studies; 75 genes had mutations in >10% of patients, including genes previously reported as associated with FL. Univariate analysis yielded responder-associated genes FANCA, HISTH1B, ANXA6, BTG1, and PARP10, highlighting the importance of functions outside of B-cell receptor signaling, including epigenetic processes, DNA damage repair, cell cycle/proliferation, and cell motility/invasiveness. While nonresponder-associated genes included well-known TP53 and CARD11, genetic classifiers developed using nonresponder-associated genes included ATP6AP1, EP400, ARID1A, SOCS1, and TBL1XR1, suggesting resistance to ibrutinib may be related to broad biological functions connected to epigenetic modification, telomere maintenance, and cancer-associated signaling pathways (mTOR, JAK/STAT, NF-κB)., Conclusion: The results from univariate and genetic classifier analyses provide insights into genes associated with response or resistance to ibrutinib in FL and identify a classifier developed using nonresponder-associated genes, which warrants further investigation., Trial Registration: NCT01779791., (© 2021 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

PI3-kinase p110δ is mainly expressed in lymphocytes and is an attractive therapeutic target in B cell lymphomas. Targeting p110β may further suppress tumor growth and overcome escape mechanisms. KA2237 is an oral, potent, dual p110β/p110δ inhibitor. In preclinical studies, KA2237 inhibited p110β- and p110δ-dependent AKT activation and suppressed proliferation of diverse hematological and epithelial tumors. Twenty-one patients received KA2237 in a first-in-human phase I study (NCT02679196; diffuse large B cell, n  = 8; follicular, n  = 5; mantle cell, n  = 3; chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma, n  = 3; marginal zone, n  = 1; Waldenstrom's, n  = 1). Median age 69; median prior therapies 3. Eighty-six percent of patients experienced treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs). Forty-three percent of patients experienced grade ≥3 TRAEs, with rash ( n  = 3), pneumonia ( n  = 3), transaminitis ( n  = 2), and pneumonitis ( n  = 2) being most common. Thirty-three percent discontinued treatment due to adverse events. KA2237 induced objective responses in indolent and aggressive lymphoma (overall response rate 37%; complete response n  = 4, partial response n  = 3).

Purpose: Tafasitamab, an Fc-modified, humanized, anti-CD19 monoclonal antibody, in combination with lenalidomide, demonstrated efficacy in transplant-ineligible patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), in the single-arm, phase II L-MIND study (NCT02399085). RE-MIND, a retrospective observational study, generated a historic control for L-MIND to delineate the contribution of tafasitamab to the efficacy of the combination., Patients and Methods: Data were retrospectively collected from patients with R/R DLBCL treated with lenalidomide monotherapy for comparison with tafasitamab + lenalidomide-treated patients (L-MIND). Key eligibility criteria were aligned with L-MIND. Estimated propensity score-based Nearest Neighbor 1:1 Matching methodology balanced the cohorts for nine prespecified prognostic baseline covariates. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed best overall response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included complete response (CR) rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS)., Results: Data from 490 patients going through lenalidomide monotherapy were collected; 140 qualified for matching with the L-MIND cohort. The primary analysis included 76 patients from each cohort who received a lenalidomide starting dose of 25 mg/day. Cohort baseline covariates were comparable. A significantly better ORR of 67.1% (95% confidence interval, 55.4-77.5) was observed for the combination therapy versus 34.2% (23.7-46.0) for lenalidomide monotherapy [odds ratio, 3.89 (1.90-8.14); P < 0.0001]. Higher CR rates were achieved with combination therapy compared with lenalidomide monotherapy [39.5% (28.4-51.4) vs. 13.2% (6.5-22.9)]. Survival endpoints favored combination therapy. Lenalidomide monotherapy outcomes were similar to previously published data., Conclusions: RE-MIND enabled the estimation of the additional treatment effect achieved by combining tafasitamab with lenalidomide in patients with R/R DLBCL., (©2021 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy targeting CD19 may be associated with long-term adverse effects such as cytopenia and immune deficiency. In order to characterize these late events, we analyzed 31 patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma treated with axicabtagene ciloleucel at our institution on two clinical trials, ZUMA-1 (clinicaltrials gov. Identifier: NCT02348216) and ZUMA-9 (clinicaltrials gov. Identifier: NCT03153462). Complete blood counts, lymphocyte subsets, and immunoglobulin levels were measured serially until month 24 or progression. Fifteen (48%) patients had grade 3-4 cytopenia, including anemia (five, 16%), neutropenia (nine, 29%), or thrombocytopenia (13, 42%) at day 30. Cytopenia at day 30 was not significantly associated with later diagnosis of myelodysplasia. Among patients with ongoing remission, grade 3-4 cytopenia was observed in one of nine (11%) at 2 years. While peripheral CD8+ T cells recovered early, CD4+ T-cell recovery was delayed with a count of <200/mL in three of nine (33%) patients at 1 year and two of seven (29%) at 2 years. Immunoglobulin G levels normalized in five of nine (56%) patients at 2 years. Thirteen (42%) patients developed grade 3-4 infectious complications, including herpes zoster and Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia. These results suggest the need for prolonged monitoring and prophylaxis against opportunistic infections in these patients, to improve the longterm safety of axicabtagene ciloleucel therapy.

Background : Atypical Usher syndrome has recently been associated with arylsulfatase G ( ARSG) variants. In these cases, characteristic findings include progressive sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) without vestibular involvement and ring-shaped late-onset retinitis pigmentosa (RP). Materials and Methods: One patient with atypical Usher syndrome and a novel homozygous ARSG variant was included in this study. The patient underwent a comprehensive ophthalmic examination, including multimodal imaging and genetic testing. Results: A 60-year-old male of Persian decent presented to our clinic with a history of 20 years of progressive SNHL, and 10 years of progressive peripheral vision loss and pigmentary retinopathy. Consistent with previous reports of ARSG -related atypical Usher syndrome, fundus examination revealed ring-shaped retinal hyperpigmentation and fundus autofluorescence (FAF) demonstrated a six-zone pattern of autofluorescence. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) showed extensive cystoid spaces concentrated in the ganglion cell layer. Widefield OCT angiography at the level of the choriocapillaris showed signs of atrophy that corresponded to the FAF hypofluorescent zone. The patient was homozygous for a novel ARSG variant c. 1270 C > T, p. Arg424Cys. Conclusion: We report a novel ARSG variant in a case of atypical Usher syndrome and describe multimodal imaging findings that further characterize the effect of ARSG in the pathogenesis of atypical Usher syndrome.

Purpose: Phosphatidylinositol-3-kinase (PI3K) inhibitors have shown activity in relapsed or refractory (R/R) indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (iNHL). PI3K inhibitors have been hampered by poor long-term tolerability and toxicity, which interfere with continuous use. Umbralisib, a dual inhibitor of PI3Kδ/casein kinase-1ε, exhibits improved selectivity for PI3Kδ compared with other PI3K inhibitors. This phase IIb trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of umbralisib in patients with R/R iNHL., Patients and Methods: In this multicohort, open-label, phase IIb study, 208 patients with R/R marginal zone, follicular, or small lymphocytic lymphoma (MZL, FL, or SLL) unresponsive to prior treatments (≥ 1 MZL; ≥ 2 FL/SLL), including ≥ 1 anti-CD20-based therapy, were administered umbralisib 800 mg orally once daily until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or study withdrawal. Primary end point is overall response rate; secondary end points include time to response, duration of response, progression-free survival, and safety., Results: The median follow-up is 27.7 months (efficacy) and 21.4 months (safety). The overall response rate was 47.1%, and tumor reduction occurred in 86.4% of patients. The median time to response was 2.7-4.6 months. The median duration of response was not reached for MZL, 11.1 months for FL, and 18.3 months for SLL. Median progression-free survival was not reached for MZL, 10.6 months for FL, and 20.9 months for SLL. At least one grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was reported in 53.4% of patients. TEAEs led to umbralisib discontinuation in 32 patients (15.4%). A total of 31 patients (14.9%) discontinued because of a treatment-related adverse event. Grade ≥ 3 TEAEs reported in ≥ 10% of patients: neutropenia (11.5%) and diarrhea (10.1%). Increased ALT/AST (grade ≥ 3) occurred in 6.7%/7.2% of patients., Conclusion: Umbralisib achieved meaningful clinical activity in heavily pretreated patients with iNHL. The safety profile was manageable, with a relatively low incidence of immune-mediated toxicities and adverse event-related discontinuations., Competing Interests: Nathan H. FowlerEmployment: BostongeneConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche/Genentech, TG Therapeutics, Verastem, Bayer, Celgene, NovartisResearch Funding: Roche, Celgene, Gilead Sciences, TG Therapeutics, Novartis, AbbVie, BeiGene Felipe SamaniegoConsulting or Advisory Role: Astex Pharmaceuticals, ADC Therapeutics, Imbrium Therapeutics Wojciech JurczakResearch Funding: TG Therapeutics Nilanjan GhoshConsulting or Advisory Role: Seattle Genetics, TG Therapeutics, AstraZeneca, Verastem, Pharmacyclics/Janssen, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Genmab, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Beigene, AbbVie, IncyteSpeakers' Bureau: AbbVie, Janssen Oncology, Kite/Gilead Sciences, Seattle Genetics, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Pharmacyclics/Janssen, EpizymeResearch Funding: Pharmacyclics, TG Therapeutics, Genentech/Roche, Seattle Genetics, Bristol-Myers Squibb/Celgene, Gilead Sciences Enrico DerenziniConsulting or Advisory Role: AstraZenecaResearch Funding: TG-Therapeutics, ADC Therapeutics James A. ReevesResearch Funding: Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Eli Lilly, Tesaro, TG Therapeutics, Genentech, Celgene, Merck, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boston Biomedical Inc, AstraZeneca, NovoCure, Calithera Biosciences, Novartis, Guardant Health, Acerta Pharma, Rhizen Pharmaceuticals, Takeda, Onconova Therapeutics, Sanofi, CTI Biopharma, Eisai, Janssen Chan Y. CheahHonoraria: Roche/Genentech, Janssen-Cilag, TG Therapeutics, Loxo/Lilly, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, Ascentage Pharma, MDSConsulting or Advisory Role: Janssen-Cilag, Roche/Genentech, TG Therapeutics, Loxo/Lilly, Gilead Sciences, AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Ascentage Pharma, MDSSpeakers' Bureau: Janssen-CilagResearch Funding: Roche, Celgene, AbbVieTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Roche Tycel PhillipsHonoraria: Seattle Genetics, Incyte, Pharmacyclics, Bayer, Gilead Sciences, GenentechConsulting or Advisory Role: Seattle Genetics, Pharmacyclics, Incyte, Genentech, Bayer, Gilead Sciences, Curis, Kite/Gilead, Celgene, GenmabResearch Funding: AbbVie, Pharmacyclics/Janssen, Bayer Ewa Lech-MarandaConsulting or Advisory Role: Roche, Amgen, AbbVie, Astellas Pharma, Novartis, Janssen-Cilag, Sanofi/Aventis, Takeda, Gilead Sciences Bruce D. ChesonConsulting or Advisory Role: TG Therapeutics, AbbVie, Pharmacyclics/Janssen, Morphosys, Celgene, Karyopharm Therapeutics, Epizyme, Gilead Sciences, SymBio Pharmaceuticals, Parexel, Merck, Glaxo Smith Kline, Beigene, Kite, Reddy Biosimilar, Bayer, CelgeneResearch Funding: TG Therapeutics, Trillium Therapeutics, Seattle Genetics, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Gilead Sciences, Pharmacyclics, AbbVie, AstraZenecaTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: SymBio Pharmaceuticals Paolo F. CaimiConsulting or Advisory Role: Genentech, Seattle Genetics, TG Therapeutics, Kite Pharma, ADC Therapeutics, Bayer, Amgen, Verastem, EpizymeSpeakers' Bureau: CelgeneResearch Funding: Genentech, ADC Therapeutics Lori A. LeslieConsulting or Advisory Role: Kite/Gilead, TG Therapeutics, Celgene/BMS, Seattle Genetics, AbbVie, PCYC/Janssen, ADC Therapeutics, BeiGene, AstraZenecaSpeakers' Bureau: Kite Pharma, Celgene/BMS, Seattle Genetics, AbbVie, PCYC/Janssen, ADC Therapeutics, BeiGene, AstraZeneca, Epizyme, Karyopharm Julio C. ChavezConsulting or Advisory Role: Kite/Gilead, Novartis, Karyopharm Therapeutics, MorphoSys, TeneoBio, AbbVie, JanssenSpeakers' Bureau: AstraZeneca, BeiGene, MorphoSys, EpizymeResearch Funding: Merck Gustavo FonsecaHonoraria: Amgen, CelgeneConsulting or Advisory Role: Amgen, Celgene, Bayer, Abvie/Pharmacyclics, Dava Oncology, KaryopharmSpeakers' Bureau: Amgen, CelgeneResearch Funding: Celgene, Amgen, TG Therapeutics, Verastem OncologyTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Amgen, Celgene Sunil BabuStock and Other Ownership Interests: Fort Wayne Medical Oncology & Hematology, Lutheran HospitalHonoraria: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Lilly, Bayer, AstraZenecaConsulting or Advisory Role: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Alexion Pharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, argenx, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, Kite Pharma, Janssen OncologySpeakers' Bureau: Alexion PharmaceuticalsResearch Funding: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Novartis, Genentech/Roche, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Janssen Oncology, Amgen, TG Therapeutics, AbbVie, Lilly, Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Merck, Novartis, Syndax, Nektar, Sanofi, argenxTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Alexion Pharmaceuticals, Lilly, Janssen Oncology, Genentech/Roche Daniel J. HodsonResearch Funding: Gilead Sciences John M. BurkeConsulting or Advisory Role: Genentech/Roche, AbbVie, Seattle Genetics, Bayer, AstraZeneca, Adaptive Biotechnologies, Verastem, MorphoSys, Kura Oncology, Epizyme, BeiGene, Kymera, NovartisSpeakers' Bureau: Seattle Genetics, Beigene Jeff P. SharmanLeadership: US OncologyConsulting or Advisory Role: Pharmacyclics, Celgene, TG Therapeutics, Genentech, AbbVie, Acerta Pharma/AstraZeneca, Beigene, PfizerResearch Funding: Pharmacyclics, Genentech, Celgene, Acerta Pharma, Gilead Sciences, Seattle Genetics, TG Therapeutics, Merck, Takeda John M. PagelConsulting or Advisory Role: Gilead Sciences, AstraZeneca, Actinium Pharmaceuticals, BeiGene, Loxo Hari P. MiskinEmployment: TG TherapeuticsLeadership: TG TherapeuticsStock and Other Ownership Interests: TG TherapeuticsTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: TG Therapeutics Peter SportelliEmployment: TG TherapeuticsLeadership: TG TherapeuticsStock and Other Ownership Interests: TG TherapeuticsTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: TG Therapeutics Owen A. O'ConnorEmployment: TG TherapeuticsLeadership: TG TherapeuticsBoard Appointments, Stock, and Other Ownership Interests: TG Therapeutics, Kymera, Myeloid Therapeutics, NomoCan PharmaceuticalsHonoraria: MundipharmaConsulting or Advisory Role: Mundipharma Research, Astex PharmaceuticalsResearch Funding: Merck, Celgene/Bristol-Myers Squibb, Seagen, Mundipharma, Astex Pharmaceuticals, ADC Therapeutics Michael S. WeissEmployment: TG TherapeuticsLeadership: TG TherapeuticsStock and Other Ownership Interests: TG TherapeuticsTravel, Accommodations, Expenses: TG Therapeutics Pier Luigi ZinzaniConsulting or Advisory Role: Sanofi, Verastem, Celltrion, Gilead Sciences, Janssen-Cilag, Bristol-Myers Squibb, SERVIER, Sandoz, MSD, Immune Design, Celgene, Portola Pharmaceuticals, Roche, EUSA Pharma, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, TG Therapeutics, TakedaSpeakers' Bureau: Verastem, Celltrion, Gilead Sciences, Janssen-Cilag, Bristol-Myers Squibb, SERVIER, Sandoz, MSD, Immune Design, Celgene, Portola Pharmaceuticals, Roche, EUSA Pharma, Kyowa Hakko KirinNo other potential conflicts of interest were reported.

High-dose chemotherapy (HDC) and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) are used as consolidation in first remission (CR1) in some centres for untreated, transformed indolent B-cell lymphoma (Tr-iNHL) but the evidence base is weak. A total of 319 patients with untreated Tr-iNHL meeting prespecified transplant eligibility criteria [age <75, LVEF ≥45%, no severe lung disease, CR by positron emission tomography or computed tomography ≥3 months after at least standard cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisolone with rituximab (R-CHOP) intensity front-line chemotherapy] were retrospectively identified. Non-diffuse large B-cell lymphoma transformations were excluded. About 283 (89%) patients had follicular lymphoma, 30 (9%) marginal-zone lymphoma and six (2%) other subtypes. Forty-nine patients underwent HDC/ASCT in CR1, and a 1:2 propensity-score-matched cohort of 98 patients based on age, stage and high-grade B-cell lymphoma with MYC, BCL2 and/or BCL6 rearrangements (HGBL-DH) was generated. After a median follow-up of 3·7 (range 0·1-18·3) years, ASCT was associated with significantly superior progression-free survival [hazard ratio (HR) 0·51, 0·27-0·98; P = 0·043] with a trend towards inferior overall survival (OS; HR 2·36;0·87-6·42; P = 0·1) due to more deaths from progressive disease (8% vs. 4%). Forty (41%) patients experienced relapse in the non-ASCT cohort - 15 underwent HDC/ASCT with seven (47%) ongoing complete remission (CR); 10 chimeric antigen receptor-modified T-cell (CAR-T) therapy with 6 (60%) ongoing CR; 3 allogeneic SCT with 2 (67%) ongoing CR. Although ASCT in CR1 improves initial duration of disease control in untreated Tr-iNHL, the impact on OS is less clear with effective salvage therapies in this era of CAR-T., (© 2020 British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Few studies have estimated the real-world economic burden such as all-cause and follicular lymphoma (FL)-related costs and health care resource utilization (HCRU) in patients with FL., Objectives: This study evaluated outcomes in patients who were newly initiated with FL indicated regimens by line of therapy with real-world data., Methods: A retrospective study was conducted among patients with FL from MarketScan ® databases between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2013. Patients were selected if they were ≥18 years old when initiated on a FL indicated therapy, had at least 1 FL-related diagnosis, ≥1 FL commonly prescribed systemic anti-cancer therapy after diagnosis, and did not use any FL indicated regimen in the 24 months prior to the first agent. These patients were followed up at least 48 months and the outcomes, including the distribution of regimens by line of therapy, the treatment duration by line of therapy, all-cause and FL-related costs, and HCRU by line of therapy were evaluated., Results: This study identified 598 patients who initiated FL indicated treatment. The average follow-up time was approximately 5.7 years. Of these patients, 50.2% (n=300) were female, with a mean age of 60.7 years (SD=13.1 years) when initiating their treatment with FL indicated regimens. Overall, 598 (100%) patients received first-line therapy, 180 (43.6%) received second-line therapy, 51 received third-line therapy, 21 received fourth-line therapy, and 10 received fifth-line therapy. Duration of treatment by each line of therapy was 370 days, 392 days, 162 days, 148 days, and 88 days, respectively. The most common first-line regimens received by patients were rituximab (n=201, 33.6%), R-CHOP (combination of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin hydrochloride [hydroxydaunomycin]; n=143, 24.0%), BR (combination of bendamustine and rituximab; n=143, 24.0%), and R-CVP (combination of rituximab, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisone; n=71, 11.9%). The most common second-line treatment regimens were (N=180): rituximab (n=78, 43.3%) and BR (n=41, 22.8%). Annualized all-cause health care costs per patient ranged from US$97 141 (SD: US$144 730) for first-line to US$424 758 (SD: US$715 028) for fifth-line therapy., Conclusions: The primary regimens used across treatment lines conform to those recommended by the National Comprehensive Cancer Network clinical practice guidelines. The economic burden for patients with FL is high and grows with subsequent lines of therapy.

Neurotoxicity or immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) is the second most common acute toxicity after chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. However, there are limited data on the clinical and radiologic correlates of ICANS. We conducted a cohort analysis of 100 consecutive patients with relapsed or refractory large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) treated with standard of care axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel). ICANS was graded according to an objective grading system. Neuroimaging studies and electroencephalograms (EEGs) were reviewed by an expert neuroradiologist and neurologist. Of 100 patients included in the study, 68 (68%) developed ICANS of any grade and 41 (41%) had grade ≥3. Median time to ICANS onset was 5 days, and median duration was 6 days. ICANS grade ≥3 was associated with high peak ferritin (P = .03) and C-reactive protein (P = .001) levels and a low peak monocyte count (P = .001) within the 30 days after axi-cel infusion. Magnetic resonance imaging was performed in 38 patients with ICANS and revealed 4 imaging patterns with features of encephalitis (n = 7), stroke (n = 3), leptomeningeal disease (n = 2), and posterior reversible encephalopathy syndrome (n = 2). Abnormalities noted on EEG included diffuse slowing (n = 49), epileptiform discharges (n = 6), and nonconvulsive status epilepticus (n = 8). Although reversible, grade ≥3 ICANS was associated with significantly shorter progression-free (P = .02) and overall survival (progression being the most common cause of death; P = .001). Our results suggest that imaging and EEG abnormalities are common in patients with ICANS, and high-grade ICANS is associated with worse outcome after CAR T-cell therapy in LBCL patients., (© 2020 by The American Society of Hematology.)

The impact of pre-treatment maximum standardized uptake value (SUV max ) on the outcome of follicular lymphoma (FL) following specific frontline regimens has not been explored. We performed a retrospective analysis of 346 patients with advanced stage follicular lymphoma (FL) without histological evidence of transformation, and analyzed the impact of SUV max on outcome after frontline therapy. Fifty-two (15%) patients had a SUV max >18, and a large lymph node ≥6 cm was the only factor associating with SUV max >18 on multivariate analysis (odds ratio 2.7, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.3-5.3, P =0.006). The complete response rate was significantly lower among patients treated with non-anthracycline-based regimens if SUV max was >18 (45% vs 92%, P <0.001), but not among patients treated with R-CHOP ( P =1). SUV max >18 was associated with significantly shorter progression-free survival among patients treated with non-anthracycline-based regimens (77 months vs. not reached, P =0.02), but not among patients treated with R-CHOP ( P =0.73). SUV max >18 associated with shorter overall survival (OS) both in patients treated with R-CHOP (8-year OS 70% vs. 90%, P =0.02) and non-anthracycline-based frontline regimens (8-year OS 50% vs 85%, P =0.001). In conclusion, pre-treatment PET scan has prognostic and predictive value in patients with advanced stage FL receiving frontline treatment., (Copyright© 2020 Ferrata Storti Foundation.)

Lenalidomide is an immunomodulatory drug approved in the United States for use with rituximab in patients with relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma. We reviewed data from trials addressing the safety and efficacy of lenalidomide alone and in combination with rituximab as a first-line therapy and as a treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma. Lenalidomide-rituximab has been demonstrated to be an effective chemotherapy-free therapy that improves upon single-agent rituximab and may become an alternative to chemoimmunotherapy., (© 2020 by The American Society of Hematology.)

In 2 randomized phase 3 trials BR resulted in longer progression-free survival (PFS) than frontline R-CHOP in patients with indolent and mantle cell lymphoma. However, in subset analyses of follicular lymphoma (FL), the results were incongruent. We conducted a retrospective matched-pair analysis to compare the outcome of patients with advanced stage FL, receiving frontline BR ( N  = 73) or R-CHOP ( N  = 73), matched by age, gender, stage, and FL International Prognostic Index score. On multivariable analysis, baseline maximum standardized uptake value (SUV max ) >13 was associated with use of R-CHOP ( p  = .001). After a median follow-up of 69 months for the BR arm and 126 months for the R-CHOP arm, 5-year PFS was 80% and 70%, respectively ( p  = .07). After adjusting for SUV max >13, the trend for better PFS in BR was not maintained. Prospective studies are needed to validate the role of pretreatment SUV max as a stratification factor in future randomized therapeutic trials in FL.

This phase 2 study evaluated the activity and safety of ibrutinib, a Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor, plus rituximab in adults with previously untreated follicular lymphoma. Patients received once-daily ibrutinib 560 mg continuously plus once-weekly rituximab 375 mg/m 2 for 4 weeks beginning Week 1 (Arm 1, n = 60) or Week 9 (following an 8-week ibrutinib lead-in) to explore biomarkers (Arm 2, n = 20). The primary endpoint was the best overall response rate (ORR). The median age was 58 years; most had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of 0 (74%) and Stage III/IV disease (84%). At a median study follow-up of 34 months in Arm 1 and 29 months in Arm 2, ORRs were 85% [95% confidence interval (CI) 73-93] and 75% (95% CI 51-91), respectively, with complete responses in 40% and 50%. The median duration of response was not reached in either arm; 30-month progression-free and overall survival rates were 67% and 97% (Arm 1) and 65% and 100% (Arm 2). The most common adverse events were fatigue, diarrhoea and nausea. Higher grade (Grade 3/4) haematological, haemorrhagic and cardiac events occurred infrequently. Ibrutinib plus rituximab was active and tolerable in first-line follicular lymphoma., (© 2020 The Authors. British Journal of Haematology published by British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Patients with early-stage nodal follicular lymphoma (FL) may be rendered free of detectable disease by a diagnostic excisional biopsy. We reviewed the management and outcomes of 48 patients with FL, diagnosed from 2003-2013, treated at a single institution. The primary endpoints were local control (LC) and progression-free survival (PFS).Median age at diagnosis was 54.5 years (range 15-74 years). Forty-seven patients were stage I (97.9%); 15 patients (31.3%) had grade 3 disease. Initial management consisted of observation (12 patients; 25.0%), radiation therapy (RT) alone (12 patients; 25.0%), systemic therapy alone (9 cases; 18.8%), or both (15 patients; 31.3%). Median follow-up was 4.92 years (range 0.5-13.83 years). 4-year PFS and OS were 80.9% and 97.1%, respectively. Patients treated with additional therapy experienced significantly better 4-year LC (100% vs. 81.8%; p  = .012) and 4-year PFS (86.7% vs. 63.6%; p  = .006).Patients with completely resected limited-stage FL would benefit from therapy beyond excisional biopsy alone.

Controversy exists regarding the optimal management of limited stage grade 3 follicular lymphoma (FL3). We assessed the treatment outcomes of 190 consecutive patients with stage I-II FL. Fifty two patients had FL3 disease, in whom the median age was 55 years. At a median follow-up of 65 months, 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 76.6% and 87.6%, respectively. Patients receiving systemic therapy followed by radiation therapy (RT) had a significantly better PFS ( p =.003) than those treated with RT alone, but similar OS ( p  = .476). Patients treated with RT had 100% local control. Compared to 132 patients with grade 1-2 FL, those with FL3 had similar PFS ( p  = .493) and OS ( p   =  .330). Patients with FL3 can experience favorable outcomes when treated with a combination of systemic therapy and RT, comparable to low grade FL.

Background: Programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) are frequently expressed in T-cell lymphomas. This provides a rationale for exploration of immune checkpoint inhibitors in the management of T-cell lymphomas., Patients and Methods: In this phase II single-arm multicenter trial, patients with relapsed or refractory systemic T-cell lymphoma were treated with 200 mg pembrolizumab intravenously every 21 days. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints were response rate, overall survival, response duration, and safety. We assessed PD-L1, p-AKT expression, and peripheral blood immune cells as potential predictive biomarkers., Results: Of 18 enrolled patients, 13 were evaluable for the primary endpoint. The trial was halted early after a preplanned interim futility analysis. The overall response rate was 33% (95% confidence interval [CI], 9%-55%); 4 patients achieved a complete response (27%; 95% CI, 5%-49%). The median PFS was 3.2 months (95% CI, 1.2-3.7 months), and the median overall survival was 10.6 months (95% CI, 3.2-100 months). The median duration of response was 2.9 months (95% CI, 0-10.1 months). Two of the 4 complete responders remain in remission > 15 months. Rash was the most common adverse event (17%; n = 3). The most common ≥ grade 3 treatment-emergent adverse events were rash and pneumonitis (11%; n = 2 each). Neither PD-L1 nor p-AKT expression were associated with outcomes. However, a higher relative frequency of CD4 + T lymphocytes pre-treatment was associated with improved PFS (hazard ratio, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.03-0.74)., Conclusion: Pembrolizumab demonstrated modest single-agent activity in relapsed or refractory T-cell lymphoma., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Lack of consensus for first-line marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) treatment and toxicities associated with currently available systemic therapies have inspired evaluation of immunotherapeutic agents yielding robust outcomes with improved tolerability. We previously reported durable efficacy with first-line lenalidomide and rituximab (R 2 ) in follicular lymphoma, MZL and small lymphocytic lymphoma with a subsequent long-term follow-up shown here in MZL patients. This phase 2 investigator-initiated study included previously untreated, stage III/IV MZL patients treated with lenalidomide 20 mg/day on days 1-21 and rituximab 375 mg/m 2 on day 1 of each 28-day cycle, continuing in responders for ≥6-12 cycles. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR); secondary endpoints were complete and partial response (CR, PR), safety, and progression-free survival (PFS). The ORR was 93% with 70% attaining CR/CR unconfirmed. At median follow-up of 75·1 months, median PFS was 59·8 months and 5-year OS was 96%. Most non-haematological adverse events (AE) were grade 1/2. Grade 3 haematological AEs were neutropenia (33%) and leucopenia (7%), and grade 4 were leucopenia (3%) and thrombocytopenia (3%). Two patients died of secondary malignancies; no treatment-related fatalities occurred. With extended follow-up, outcomes for MZL patients receiving R 2 were robust with no unexpected late or delayed toxicities., (© 2019 British Society for Haematology and John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Radiation fields for limited-stage nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (NLPHL) have shrunk over time; involved-site radiation therapy (ISRT) has replaced extended-field radiation therapy (EFRT) and involved-field radiation therapy (IFRT), but this has not been validated. The role of systemic therapy is unclear. We reviewed 71 stage I/II NLPHL patients and assessed progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), locoregional disease-free survival, and distant disease-free survival (DDFS). Median patient age was 39 years, and 61% had stage II disease. Thirty-six (51%) received radiation therapy (RT) only, 6 (8%) received systemic therapy only, and 29 (41%) received both. More patients receiving combined therapy had B symptoms ( P = .035) and stage II disease ( P = .001). In the RT-only group, 9 (25%) received EFRT, 13 (36%) received IFRT, and 14 (39%) received ISRT; in the combined-modality group, 3 (10%) received EFRT, 7 (24%) received IFRT, and 19 (66%) received ISRT. After a median follow-up of 6.2 years, 15 patients relapsed (13 distant, 2 locoregional). Five-year PFS and OS rates were 86% and 96% and did not differ by treatment. In the RT-only group, follow-up was shorter in the ISRT cohort (2.6 years vs 17.9 years [EFRT] and 8.5 years [IFRT], P < .01), but 5-year PFS did not differ by field size ( P = .20). Locoregional control rates were 100% for the RT-only and combined groups, and corresponding 5-year DDFS rates were 93% and 95% ( P = .95). Eight patients (11%) experienced a second malignancy (1 within RT field). Six patients died (1 from lymphoma). Use of limited ISRT fields does not appear to increase the risk of locoregional relapse, even when RT is given as single-modality therapy., (© 2019 by The American Society of Hematology.)

Purpose: Patients with indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma typically respond well to first-line immunochemotherapy. At relapse, single-agent rituximab is commonly administered. Data suggest the immunomodulatory agent lenalidomide could increase the activity of rituximab., Methods: A phase III, multicenter, randomized trial of lenalidomide plus rituximab versus placebo plus rituximab was conducted in patients with relapsed and/or refractory follicular or marginal zone lymphoma. Patients received lenalidomide or placebo for 12 cycles plus rituximab once per week for 4 weeks in cycle 1 and day 1 of cycles 2 through 5. The primary end point was progression-free survival per independent radiology review., Results: A total of 358 patients were randomly assigned to lenalidomide plus rituximab (n = 178) or placebo plus rituximab (n = 180). Infections (63% v 49%), neutropenia (58% v 23%), and cutaneous reactions (32% v 12%) were more common with lenalidomide plus rituximab. Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (50% v 13%) and leukopenia (7% v 2%) were higher with lenalidomide plus rituximab; no other grade 3 or 4 adverse event differed by 5% or more between groups. Progression-free survival was significantly improved for lenalidomide plus rituximab versus placebo plus rituximab, with a hazard ratio of 0.46 (95% CI, 0.34 to 0.62; P < .001) and median duration of 39.4 months (95% CI, 22.9 months to not reached) versus 14.1 months (95% CI, 11.4 to 16.7 months), respectively., Conclusion: Lenalidomide improved efficacy of rituximab in patients with recurrent indolent lymphoma, with an acceptable safety profile.

Stage I non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) is rare; prognostic impact of different histologic subtypes and treatment modality is still unclear. We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database to evaluate survival outcomes among adult patients (age ≥ 18 years, N = 58,230) diagnosed with stage I NHL of various histologic subtypes between 1998 and 2014. Five-year disease-specific survival of patients with stage I diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), follicular lymphoma (FL), marginal zone lymphoma (MZL), small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL), Burkitt lymphoma (BL), mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), and peripheral T cell lymphoma (PTCL) was 82%, 92%, 95%, 89%, 78%, 77%, and 77%, respectively. The median disease-specific survival was not reached in all histologic subtypes analyzed; however, there does not appear to be a plateau in disease-specific survival of patients with stage I NHL irrespective of subtypes. Although lymphoma was the most common cause of death (40.7%), death from other cancer (17.4%) and cardiovascular disease (13.6%) were also frequent. Chemotherapy appeared favorably associated with OS in patients with DLBCL, BL, and MCL while patients with FL, MZL, SLL, and PTCL who require chemotherapy for initial treatment showed shorter OS. Patients with stage I NHL have favorable disease-specific survival; however, no plateau was seen regardless of histologic subtypes thus suggesting that patients may need attention and follow-up even in aggressive lymphomas after 5 years of remission.

Background: Therapeutic approaches for B-cell malignancies continue to evolve, especially with regard to combination approaches. We assessed the safety and efficacy of the triplet ublituximab, umbralisib, and ibrutinib in patients with advanced B-cell malignancies., Methods: We did an open-label, phase 1 study with dose-escalation and dose-expansion phases, at five centres in the USA. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older with histologically confirmed lymphocytic leukaemia or relapsed or refractory B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, had measurable disease, adequate organ function, and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 2 or less. Patients with known CNS lymphoma, active hepatitis B or C infection, or HIV were excluded. In the dose-escalation cohort, patients were treated in cycles of 28 days with escalating doses of oral umbralisib (400, 600, or 800 mg) and fixed doses of intravenous ublituximab (900 mg) and oral ibrutinib (420 mg for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia; 560 mg for patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma) in a standard 3 × 3 design until disease progression or intolerance. In the dose-expansion phase, patients were given the recommended dose of the drug combination as determined from the dose-escalation phase. The primary endpoints were safety, dose-limiting toxicities, and the maximum tolerated dose of umbralisib, when given in combination with ublituximab and ibrutinib. Safety was assessed in patients who received at least one dose of study drug; activity was assessed in all patients who had at least one post-treatment efficacy measurement. The study is ongoing but no longer recruiting patients. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02006485., Findings: Between Sept 2, 2014, and Nov 6, 2017, we enrolled 46 patients: 24 in the dose-escalation cohort (n=14 chronic lymphocytic leukaemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma; n=10 B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma) and 22 in the dose-expansion cohort (n=9 chronic lymphocytic leukaemia or small lymphocytic lymphoma; n=13 B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma). 46 patients received at least one dose of study drug. The maximum tolerated dose of umbralisib was not reached. The recommended dose for the dose-expansion phase was umbralisib 800 mg orally once daily plus ibrutinib orally once daily and intravenous ublituximab 900 mg administered on days 1, 8, and 15 of cycle 1, day 1 of cycles 2-6, and on day 1 of cycles 9 and 12. 37 (84%) of 44 patients achieved an overall response (complete or partial response). The most common any-grade adverse events were diarrhoea (n=27 [59%]), fatigue (n=23 [50%]), infusion-related reaction (n=20 [43%]), dizziness (n=17 [37%]), nausea (n=17 [37%]), and cough (n=16 [35%]). Grade 3-4 adverse events were manageable with the most common being neutropenia (n=10 [22%]) and cellulitis (n=6 [13%]). Serious adverse events occurred in 11 (24%) of 46 patients and included rash (n=2 [4%]), pneumonia (n=2 [4%]), atrial fibrillation (n=2 [4%]), sepsis (n=2 [4%]), abdominal pain (n=1 [2%]), syncope (n=1 [2%]), cellulitis (n=1 [2%]), pneumonitis (n=1 [2%]), headache (n=1 [2%]), lung infection (n=1 [2%]), skin infection (n=1 [2%]), pleural effusion (n=1 [2%]), pericardial infusion (n=1 [2%]), upper gastrointestinal bleeding (n=1 [2%]), diarrhoea (n=1 [2%]), and weakness (n=1 [2%]). No deaths related to adverse events occurred., Interpretation: The combination of ublituximab, umbralisib, and ibrutinib seems to be tolerable and is associated with encouraging activity in advanced chronic lymphocytic leukaemia and B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma. This triplet combination will require further investigation in future studies to improve understanding of this novel, chemotherapy-free triplet combination in the management of these cancers., Funding: TG Therapeutics., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Rituximab plus chemotherapy has been shown to be effective in patients with advanced-stage, previously untreated follicular lymphoma; nevertheless, most patients will have a relapse. Combination immunotherapy with lenalidomide and rituximab is an immunomodulatory regimen that has shown promising activity in patients with indolent B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma., Methods: We conducted this multicenter, international, phase 3 superiority trial to evaluate rituximab plus lenalidomide, as compared with rituximab plus chemotherapy, in patients with previously untreated follicular lymphoma. Patients were randomly assigned to receive one of the two regimens, followed by maintenance monotherapy with rituximab. Treatment with rituximab plus lenalidomide consisted of 18 cycles of the two drugs, followed by rituximab maintenance therapy every 8 weeks for 12 cycles (six additional doses). Treatment with rituximab plus chemotherapy consisted of the investigator's choice of one of three rituximab-based regimens, followed by maintenance monotherapy with rituximab every 8 weeks for 12 cycles. The primary end points were complete response (confirmed or unconfirmed) at 120 weeks and progression-free survival., Results: A total of 1030 patients were randomly assigned to receive rituximab plus lenalidomide (513 patients) or rituximab plus chemotherapy (517 patients). The rate of confirmed or unconfirmed complete response at 120 weeks was similar in the two groups: 48% (95% confidence interval [CI], 44 to 53) in the rituximab-lenalidomide group and 53% (95% CI, 49 to 57) in the rituximab-chemotherapy group (P=0.13). The interim 3-year rate of progression-free survival was 77% (95% CI, 72 to 80) and 78% (95% CI, 74 to 82), respectively. A higher percentage of patients in the rituximab-chemotherapy group had grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (32% vs. 50%) and febrile neutropenia of any grade (2% vs. 7%), and a higher percentage of patients in the rituximab-lenalidomide group had grade 3 or 4 cutaneous reactions (7% vs. 1%)., Conclusions: Among patients with previously untreated follicular lymphoma, efficacy results were similar with rituximab plus lenalidomide and rituximab plus chemotherapy (with both regimens followed by rituximab maintenance therapy). The safety profile differed in the two groups. (Funded by Celgene; RELEVANCE ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT01476787 and NCT01650701 , and EudraCT number, 2011-002792-42 .).

Purpose The Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitor ibrutinib has demonstrated clinical activity in B-cell malignancies. The DAWN study assessed the efficacy and safety of single-agent ibrutinib in chemoimmunotherapy relapsed/refractory follicular lymphoma (FL) patients. Methods DAWN was an open-label, single-arm, phase II study of ibrutinib in patients with FL with two or more prior lines of therapy. Patients received ibrutinib 560 mg daily until progressive disease/unacceptable toxicity. The primary objective was independent review committee-assessed overall response rate (ORR; complete response plus partial response). Exploratory analyses of T-cell subsets in peripheral blood (baseline/cycle 3) and cytokines/chemokines (baseline/cycle 2) were performed for available samples. Results Between March 2013 and May 2016, 110 patients with a median of three prior lines of therapy were enrolled. At median follow-up of 27.7 months, ORR was 20.9% (95% CI, 13.7% to 29.7%, which did not meet the 18% lower-bound threshold for the primary end point). Twelve patients achieved a complete response (11%; 95% CI, 5.8% to 18.3%). Median duration of response was 19.4 months (range, 1 to ≥ 33 months), with a median progression-free survival of 4.6 months and a 30-month overall survival of 61% (95% CI, 0.51% to 0.70%). Lymphoma symptoms resolved in 67%. Seven of 32 patients who experienced initial radiologic progression responded upon continuing therapy (pseudoprogression). The most common adverse events were diarrhea, fatigue, cough, and muscle spasms; 48.2% of patients reported serious adverse events. In patients who experienced a response, regulatory T cells were downregulated at C3D1 ( P = .02), and Th1-promoting (antitumor) cytokines interferon-γ and interleukin-12 increased ( P ≤ .035). Conclusion With an ORR of 20.9%, ibrutinib failed to meet its primary efficacy end point in chemoimmunotherapy in patients with relapsed/refractory FL, although responses were durable and associated with a reduction in regulatory T cells and increases in proinflammatory cytokines.

Primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) is a rare and aggressive extranodal presentation of lymphoma; however, the data for outcomes of patients with subtypes other than diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) are limited. Therefore, we analyzed overall survival (OS) of adult patients diagnosed with PCNSL by histologic subtype between 1998 and 2014 using the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results. A total of 4375 patients were identified. The median age of the patients was 64 years (range: 18-96). DLBCL was the most common histology (N=3,091), followed by follicular lymphoma (FL, N=83), peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL, N=64), marginal zone lymphoma (MZL, N=63), Burkitt lymphoma (BL, N=27), small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL, N=22), Hodgkin lymphoma (HL, N=13) and others (N=1,012). The 5-year OS rates were 30% in DLBCL, 66% in FL, 33% in PTCL, 79% in MZL, 42% in BL, 38% in SLL and 45% in HL. Radiation alone showed similar OS compared to no treatment in DLBCL, BL and PTCL, while radiation alone was associated with similar OS to chemotherapy or chemo-radiation in FL and MZL. The outcomes of patients with PCNSL are unfavorable; with the exception of FL and MZL which can potentially show prolonged survival with surgical resection or radiation monotherapy., Competing Interests: CONFLICTS OF INTEREST Nothing to disclose.

We performed a retrospective analysis to identify risk factors and survival outcome for central nervous system (CNS) relapse of peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) by histologic type. Records of 600 PTCL patients diagnosed between 1999 and 2014 were analyzed including PTCL not otherwise specified (PTCL-NOS, 174 patients), angoimmunoblastic T-cell lymphoma (AITL, 144), ALK+anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL, 74), ALK-ALCL (103), extranodal NK-cell lymphoma (ENKL, 54), or others (51). With a median follow up of 57 months, 13 patients (4 PTCL-NOS, 1 AITL, 4 ALK+ALCL, 2 ALK-ALCL, 2 ENKL) experienced CNS relapse. One-year and 5-year cumulative incidence of CNS relapse were 1.5% (95%CI: 0.7-2.8%) and 2.1% (95%CI: 1.1-3.5%), respectively. The 5-year cumulative incidence of CNS relapse was 1.8% in PTCL-NOS, 0.7% in AITL, 5.4% in ALK+ALCL, 2.1% in ALK-ALCL and 3.7% in ENKL. Extranodal involvement >1 site was the only significant factor associated with higher chance of CNS relapse (HR: 4.9, 95%CI: 1.6-15.0, p = 0.005). Patients with ALK+ALCL who had extranodal involvement >1 (N = 19) had very high risk of CNS relapse with one year cumulative incidence of 17% (95%CI: 4%-37%), all occurring within six months after diagnosis. All patients with CNS relapse eventually died (median, 1.5 months; range, 0.1-10.1 months). CNS relapse in patients with PTCL is rare event but the risk varies by subtype. ALK+ALCL patients with extranodal involvement >1 site have a very high risk of early CNS relapse, and thus evaluation of CNS involvement at the time of diagnosis and possible CNS-directed prophylaxis may be considered.