Search

Background: Larger volumes of accidental air infused during medical care may end up as emboli while microbubbles of air are supposed to be absorbed and cause no harm. The aim of this autopsy study was to investigate if microbubbles of air accidently entering the bloodline may be detected as microemboli (ME) in tissue such as lungs, brain and heart. If so, do differences in prevalence exist between haemodialysis (HD) and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) patients. Methods: Included were data from 44 patients treated by medical healthcare before death. Twenty-five cases had been treated with chronic HD and 19 cases died from ALS. Since air in the bloodline activates coagulation, ME could appear. To discriminate between microbubbles caused by artificial contamination during autopsy versus microbubbles deposited in vivo, tissues were stained with a polyclonal fluorescent antibody against fibrinogen, fibrin and fragments E and D. Fluorescence staining was used to visualize ME counted within 25 microscopic fields (600x) of a tissue preparation. One tissue preparation was used if available from the lung, heart and frontal lobe of the brain and in five cases also the cerebellum. Results: Microbubbles can be verified at autopsy as ME in the lung, heart and brain in tissue from patients exposed to more extensive medical care. There were significantly more ME in the lungs versus the heart or brain. Women had fewer ME than men. The HD group had a higher median of ME per section than the ALS group (lung: 6 versus 3, P = .007; heart: 2.5 versus 1, P = .013; brain: 7.5 versus 2, P = .001) and had more sections with ME findings than the ALS group (P = .002). A correlation existed between the time on HD (months) and ME in the lungs. Conclusions: More ME were present in HD patients compared with those who suffered from ALS. Minimizing air contamination from syringes, infusions and bloodlines will decrease ME and subsequent tissue injury. Lay Summary Larger volumes of accidental air

Aims: To investigate if a single low-flux HD induces a rise in cardiac biomarkers and if a change in clinical approach may limit such mechanism. Material and methods: A total of 20 chronic HD patients each underwent three different study-dialyses. Dialyzers (low-flux polysulfone, 1.8 sqm) had been stored either dry or wet (Wet) and the blood level in the venous chamber kept low or high. Laboratory results were measured at baseline, 30 and 180 min, adjusted for the effect of fluid shift. Ultrasound measured microemboli signals (MES) within the return line. Results: Hemodialysis raised cardiac biomarkers (p < 0.001): Pentraxin 3 (PTX) at 30 min (by 22%) and at 180 min PTX (53%), Pro-BNP (15%), and TnT (5%), similarly for all three HD modes. Baseline values of Pro-BNP correlated with TnT (rho = 0.38, p = 0.004) and PTX (rho = 0.52, p < 0.001). The changes from pre- to 180 min of HD (delta-) were related to baseline values (Pro-BNP: rho = 0.91, p < 0.001; TnT: rho = 0.41, p = 0.001; PTX: rho = 0.29, p = 0.027). Delta Pro-BNP (rho = 0.67, p < 0.001) and TnT (rho = 0.38, p = 0.004) correlated with inter-dialytic-weight-gain (IDWG). Biomarkers behaved similarly between the HD modes. The least negative impact was with an IDWG <= 2.5%. Multiple regression analyses of the Wet-High mode does not exclude a relation between increased exposure of MES and factors such as release of Pro-BNP. Conclusion: Hemodialysis, independent of type of dialyzer storage, was associated with raised cardiac biomarkers, more profoundly in patients with higher pre-dialysis values and IDWG. A limitation in IDWG to <2.5% and prolonged ultrafiltration time may limit cardiac strain during HD, especially in patients with cardiovascular risk.

AIMS: To investigate if a single low-flux HD induces a rise in cardiac biomarkers and if a change in clinical approach may limit such mechanism. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 20 chronic HD patients each underwent three different study-dialyses. Dialyzers (low-flux polysulfone, 1.8 sqm) had been stored either dry or wet (Wet) and the blood level in the venous chamber kept low or high. Laboratory results were measured at baseline, 30 and 180 min, adjusted for the effect of fluid shift. Ultrasound measured microemboli signals (MES) within the return line. RESULTS: = 0.004) correlated with inter-dialytic-weight-gain (IDWG). Biomarkers behaved similarly between the HD modes. The least negative impact was with an IDWG ⩽ 2.5%. Multiple regression analyses of the Wet-High mode does not exclude a relation between increased exposure of MES and factors such as release of Pro-BNP. CONCLUSION: Hemodialysis, independent of type of dialyzer storage, was associated with raised cardiac biomarkers, more profoundly in patients with higher pre-dialysis values and IDWG. A limitation in IDWG to <2.5% and prolonged ultrafiltration time may limit cardiac strain during HD, especially in patients with cardiovascular risk., Bibliografiskt granskad

Introduction: Microbubbles of air may enter into patients during conventional hemodialysis, infusions of fluids, or by injections. The aim of this study was to investigate whether the air that enters the patient during hemodialysis can be detected in the lungs after death, and if so, whether this may be related to tissue damage. Methods: The material consisted of lung tissue from five chronic hemodialysis patients who died either during (two) or after hemodialysis (range 10 min from start until 3333 min after the last hemodialysis session); as reference group tissue was taken from seven patients who died due to amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. The lung tissue was investigated by microscopy after autopsy using a fluorescein-marked polyclonal antibody against fibrinogen as a marker for clots preformed before death. Results: All five hemodialysis patients had microbubbles of air in the lung tissue, whereas two of seven amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients had such findings (Fisher's test p = 0.0278, relative risk = 3.5, confidence interval: 1.08-11.3). There were more microbubbles of air/10 randomly investigated microscopic fields of tissue in the hemodialysis patients than the amyotrophic lateral sclerosis patients (Student's test, p < 0.05). All hemodialysis patients had a medium graded extent of pulmonary fibrosis that was not found in any of the ALS patients. The microbubbles of air were surrounded by fibrin as a sign of development of clots around the air bubbles while the patients were still alive. Conclusion: Exposure to microbubbles of air during various treatments such as hemodialysis may result in microemboli. Future studies should clarify whether microbubbles of air contribute to tissue scarring. We suggest preventive measures against the exposure to microbubbles of air during especially repeated exposures such as hemodialysis.

During hemodialysis (HD), blood that passes the dialysis device gets loaded with microbubbles (MB) of air that are returned to the patient without inducing an alarm. The aim with this study was to clarify if these signals are due to microembolies of air, clots, or artifacts, by histopathology of autopsy material of HD patients. These first results are from a patient on chronic HD. Due to pulmonary edema he was ultrafiltered. Within 30 minutes after the start, he suffered from a cardiac arrest and died. Autopsy verified the clinical findings. Microscopic investigation verified microembolies of air that were surrounded by fibrin in the lungs, brain, and heart. The study verified that MBs can enter the blood during HD and are trapped in the lungs. In addition, MBs pass the pulmonary capillaries and enter the arterial part of the body and are dispersed throughout the body. This can contribute to organ damage and be part of the poor prognoses seen in HD patients. Data support the importance to reduce MBs in the dialysis circuit.

XXXVIII Annual ESAO & IV Biennial IFAO Congress.

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown that micrometer-sized air bubbles are introduced into the patient during hemodialysis. The aim of this study was to investigate, in vitro, the influence of dialysis filters on the generation of air bubbles. METHODS: Three different kind of dialyzers were tested: one high-flux FX80 dry filter (Fresenius Medical Care AG&Co. KGaA, Bad Homburg, Germany), one low-flux F8HPS dry filter (Fresenius Medical Care AG&Co. KGaA, Bad Homburg, Germany) and a wet-stored APS-18u filter (Asahi Kasei Medical, Tokyo, Japan). The F8HPS was tested with pump flow ranging between 100 to 400 ml/min. The three filters were compared using a constant pump flow of 300 ml/min. Measurements were performed using an ultrasound Doppler instrument. RESULTS: In 90% of the series, bubbles were measured after the outlet line of the air trap without triggering an alarm. There were significantly more bubbles downstream than upstream of the filters F8HPS and FX80, while there was a significant reduction using the APS-18u. There was no reduction in the number of bubbles after passage through the air trap versus before the air trap (after the dialyzer). Increased priming volume reduced the extent of bubbles in the system. CONCLUSIONS: Data indicate that the air trap does not prevent air microemboli from entering the venous outlet part of the dialysis tubing (entry to the patient). More extended priming of the dialysis circuit may reduce the extent of microemboli that originate from dialysis filters. A wet filter may be favorable instead of dry-steam sterilized filters.

During hemodialysis blood - membrane interaction causes complement activation. During dialysis there may be an electrical current leakage to the dialyzer, especially if there is a broken ground or a defect in another electrical device coupled to the patient. This study investigated whether an electric current of 1.5 mA DC could alter blood membrane interaction as measured by changes in C3d in the blood. Such a high current leakage could occur because there is no protection in the dialysis machine (Class 1B) against auxiliary current leakage. Such a current could come from a defective external device in contact with the patient during hemodialysis. Materials: A dialysis machine (Fresenius 2008C) with a filled blood-line system containing about 350 ml whole blood from each of 8 different donors was used in vitro. Each of the eight test-runs also contained 1000 U added heparin. The dialysis procedure was performed using hemophan membranes (GFS +12, Gambro) with bicarbonate and potassium 3.0 (D210, Gambro) as dialysate. Two electric poles were placed in the blood line, before and after the dialyzer (connected in parallel) and the ground was placed at entry and exit of the dialysate fluid coming from the machine to the dialysis filter. C3d was measured before the start of “dialysis” and at 15, 30, 45 and 60 min, during dialysis. Thereafter the 1.5 mA current was switched on and additional samples were drawn at 75 and 90 min. The mean C3d values were calculated. Paired non-parametric statistical analyses were performed. Results: There was a significant and continuous increase in C3d as compared to the “predialysis” level. The increase during 0 to 30 minutes was greater than that from 30 to 60 minutes (p=0.018); the increase in C3d during 60 to 90 min, was greater than that from 30 to 60 min (p=0.018) and there was no difference between the 0 to 30 and the 60 to 90 min increases. Conclusions: A current, used in this study, was able to induce a blood membrane interaction du