Search

Rationale: Human lung transplantation is a therapeutic option for selected patients with advanced cardiopulmonary disease, but long-term survival is limited by chronic rejection. Persistent acute rejection and gastric aspiration have been implicated as risk factors but there is little or no evidence to date that they are associated.Objectives: We have tested the hypothesis that pepsin, a marker of gastric aspiration, is present in lung transplant recipients, and that high levels are associated with biopsy-diagnosed acute rejection and/or bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome.Methods: Levels of bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) pepsin were measured by ELISA in 36 lung transplant recipients, 4 normal volunteers, and 17 subjects with unexplained chronic cough.Measurements and Main Results: Our primary finding was that, compared with control subjects, BAL pepsin levels were elevated in stable lung transplant recipients, subjects with acute rejection, and subjects with bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome. Our secondary finding was that the highest levels were found in recipients with acute vascular rejection grade > or = A2 (median, 11.2; range, 5.4 - 51.7 ng/ml; normal median, 1.1; range, 0-2.3 ng/ml; p = 0.004).Conclusions: We have shown that elevated levels of pepsin, a biomarker of gastric aspiration, are consistently identified in the BAL of lung allografts. The highest levels were seen in patients with > or = grade A2 acute rejection. This provides further evidence supporting the possible role of aspiration in the development of overall allograft injury. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: A recent pilot study noted clinical benefit of macrolide therapy in the management of six lung transplant recipients with bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS), a condition previously regarded as irreversible. Objective: To examine the effect of low-dose macrolides on lung function in lung allograft recipients with established BOS and to assess whether this benefit is sustained. Methods: We retrospectively evaluated the effect of azithromycin (250 mg alternate days) on clinical status and lung function in 20 allograft recipients with established BOS, confirmed by decline in FEV[1] or FEF[25-75]; consistent high-resolution computed tomography findings; and exclusion of acute rejection, infection, or anastomatic complications. Azithromycin was introduced at mean 82 months after transplantation. BOS staging at initiation of treatment was BOS 3 (10), BOS 2 (2), BOS 1 (6), and BOS0-p (2). All patients were on maintenance immunosuppression comprising cell-cycle inhibitor, oral corticosteroids, and calcineurin inhibitor. Results: There was a significant increase in FEV[1] of median 110 ml (range,-70 to 730 ml) between baseline and 3 months of azithromycin therapy (p = 0.002). This improvement was sustained beyond 3 months in the majority of patients, who had initially benefited from azithromycin (up to 11 months follow up). Conclusions: This case series confirms the benefit of azithromycin in not only halting, but reversing the declining lung function seen in patients with BOS. This benefit appears to be maintained over time. Low-dose macrolides offer a new and exciting therapeutic strategy for the treatment of progressive BOS, and further clinical and translational mechanistic studies are required. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Nintedanib slows progression of lung function decline in patients with progressive fibrosing (PF) interstitial lung disease (ILD) and was recommended for this indication within the United Kingdom (UK) National Health Service in Scotland in June 2021 and in England, Wales and Northern Ireland in November 2021. To date, there has been no national evaluation of the use of nintedanib for PF-ILD in a real-world setting., Methods: 26 UK centres were invited to take part in a national service evaluation between 17 November 2021 and 30 September 2022. Summary data regarding underlying diagnosis, pulmonary function tests, diagnostic criteria, radiological appearance, concurrent immunosuppressive therapy and drug tolerability were collected via electronic survey., Results: 24 UK prescribing centres responded to the service evaluation invitation. Between 17 November 2021 and 30 September 2022, 1120 patients received a multidisciplinary team recommendation to commence nintedanib for PF-ILD. The most common underlying diagnoses were hypersensitivity pneumonitis (298 out of 1120, 26.6%), connective tissue disease associated ILD (197 out of 1120, 17.6%), rheumatoid arthritis associated ILD (180 out of 1120, 16.0%), idiopathic nonspecific interstitial pneumonia (125 out of 1120, 11.1%) and unclassifiable ILD (100 out of 1120, 8.9%). Of these, 54.4% (609 out of 1120) were receiving concomitant corticosteroids, 355 (31.7%) out of 1120 were receiving concomitant mycophenolate mofetil and 340 (30.3%) out of 1120 were receiving another immunosuppressive/modulatory therapy. Radiological progression of ILD combined with worsening respiratory symptoms was the most common reason for the diagnosis of PF-ILD., Conclusion: We have demonstrated the use of nintedanib for the treatment of PF-ILD across a broad range of underlying conditions. Nintedanib is frequently co-prescribed alongside immunosuppressive and immunomodulatory therapy. The use of nintedanib for the treatment of PF-ILD has demonstrated acceptable tolerability in a real-world setting., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: A.J. Simpson has received funding to his institution from Boehringer Ingelheim (BI) to undertake an educational meeting. A. West has received support from BI for speaking at or chairing educational events, and attendance and travel to educational meetings; and is part of an advisory board for BI and Avalyn Pharmaceuticals. A. John has received funding from BI to attend an educational event. A.M. Wilson has received grants from Aseptika, Brainomix and BASF, has received speakers’ fees from BI, has received support for attending meetings by Chiesi, and has institutional interests with Celgene Corporation, GSK and Insmed Inc. A. Crawshaw has received speakers’ fees from BI and AstraZeneca (AZ). A.U. Wells has undertaken advisory board activity and consultant work for BI, Roche and Veracyte. C.C. Huntley has received an honorarium for educational content from BI and sponsorship for conference attendance. D. Dosanjh has received a speaker's fee from BI, meeting attendance costs from AZ and is part of the advisory board for AZ, Gilead, BI and Synairgen. E. Renzoni has received institutional funding, honoraria for educational events and funding for conference attendance from BI, and is member of the advisory board for BI and Roche. F. Chua has received consulting fees, honoraria, support for conference attendance and is an advisory board member for BI. G. Saini has received institutional payment for educational presentation from BI. G. Dixon, H. Stone, L.M. Nicol and I.A. Forrest have received support for educational event attendance from BI. J.C.L. Rodrigues has received grant funding from NIHR, consulting fees from NHSx and HeartFlow, honoraria from Sanofi, Aidence and 4-C Research market research, meeting attendance support from Aidence and HeartFlow, leadership role in Heart and Lung Imaging LTD (HLH), stock in Radnet and shares in HLH. K. Tsaneva-Atanasova has financial support from EPSRC grant. M. Naqvi has received a grant from NHS Digital, honoraria from BI, AZ and Roche, support for meeting attendance from BI and advisory board membership for BI, and is ILD Pharmacist Network Chair and ILD-IN Co-chair. M.G. Jones has received grants from Royal Society, BI, NC3Rs, MRC, AAIR Charity and the British Lung Foundation. P.M. George has received an institutional grant from BI, honoraria from BI, Roche, Teva, Cipla and Brainomix, meeting attendance support from BI and Roche and has stock in Brainomix. P. Molyneaux has grant funding from AZ, consulting fees from Roche, BI, AZ, Trevi and Qureight, and honoraria from BI and Roche; and is an associate editor of this journal. P. Rivera-Ortega has received grant funding from MRC, institutional grant funding from BI, Roche, CSL Behring, Fibrogen, Vicore Pharma AB, Gilead Sciences and Galecto, consulting fees from BI and Roche, honoraria from BI, Roche and Respiratory Effectiveness Group (REG), support for meeting attendance from BI and REG, is a chair of the REG and member of the Global Writing Group Committee for REMAP-ILD. R.K. Coker has received honoraria from BI. S. Agnew has received honoraria from BI, support for meeting attendance from BI and is member of the BTS ILD registry advisory board. S.L. Barratt has received consulting fees and honoraria from BI. S. Hart has received research grant from BI, consulting fees from Trevi Therapeutics, honoraria and support for meeting attendance from BI and Chiesi, was Chair of the BTS Standard of Care Committee 2019–2022, and is a Trustee of Action for Pulmonary Fibrosis and an associate editor of this journal. S. Barth received honoraria from BI for educational meeting facilitating. T. Garfoot received support to attend the ILD IN annual conference. T. Gatheral has received speakers’ fees from BI. Conflict of interest: The remaining authors have no competing interests., (Copyright ©The authors 2024.)

Background: Interstitial lung disease is a known complication of rheumatoid arthritis, with a lifetime risk of developing the disease in any individual of 7·7%. We aimed to assess the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of pirfenidone for the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis-associated interstitial lung disease (RA-ILD)., Methods: TRAIL1 was a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial done in 34 academic centres specialising in interstitial lung disease in four countries (the UK, the USA, Australia, and Canada). Adults aged 18-85 years were eligible for inclusion if they met the 2010 American College of Rheumatology and European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology criteria for rheumatoid arthritis and had interstitial lung disease on a high-resolution CT scan imaging and, when available, lung biopsy. Exclusion criteria include smoking, clinical history of other known causes of interstitial lung disease, and coexistant clinically significant COPD or asthma. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive 2403 mg oral pirfenidone (pirfenidone group) or placebo (placebo group) daily. The primary endpoint was the incidence of the composite endpoint of a decline from baseline in percent predicted forced vital capacity (FVC%) of 10% or more or death during the 52-week treatment period assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Key secondary endpoints included change in absolute and FVC% over 52 weeks, the proportion of patients with a decline in FVC% of 10% or more, and the frequency of progression as defined by Outcome Measures in Rheumatoid Arthritis Clinical Trials (OMERACT) in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02808871., Findings: From May 15, 2017, to March 31, 2020, 231 patients were assessed for inclusion, of whom 123 patients were randomly assigned (63 [51%] to the pirfenidone group and 60 [49%] to the placebo group). The trial was stopped early (March 31, 2020) due to slow recruitment and the COVID-19 pandemic. The difference in the proportion of patients who met the composite primary endpoint (decline in FVC% from baseline of 10% or more or death) between the two groups was not significant (seven [11%] of 63 patients in the pirfenidone group vs nine [15%] of 60 patients in the placebo group; OR 0·67 [95% CI 0·22 to 2·03]; p=0·48). Compared with the placebo group, patients in the pirfenidone group had a slower rate of decline in lung function, measured by estimated annual change in absolute FVC (-66 vs -146; p=0·0082) and FVC% (-1·02 vs -3·21; p=0·0028). The groups were similar with regards to the decline in FVC% by 10% or more (five [8%] participants in the pirfenidone group vs seven [12%] in the placebo group; OR 0·52 [95% CI 0·14-1·90]; p=0·32) and the frequency of progression as defined by OMERACT (16 [25%] in the pirfenidone group vs 19 [32%] in the placebo group; OR 0·68 [0·30-1·54]; p=0·35). There was no significant difference in the rate of treatment-emergent serious adverse events between the two groups, and there were no treatment-related deaths., Interpretation: Due to early termination of the study and underpowering, the results should be interpreted with caution. Despite not meeting the composite primary endpoint, pirfenidone slowed the rate of decline of FVC over time in patients with RA-ILD. Safety in patients with RA-ILD was similar to that seen in other pirfenidone trials., Funding: Genentech., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests SKD reports grants and salary support from Brigham and Women's Hospital, during the study; grants, personal fees, and non-financial support from Boehringer Ingelheim; personal fees and non-financial support from Galaplagos; personal fees from Galecto, and Lupin Pharma; grants from Bristol Meyers Squibb; salary support from the Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation, and Royalties for Topics on systemic erythematous pneumonia- interstitial lung disease and myositis- interstitial lung disease from UpToDate, outside the submitted work. IG reports personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and personal fees from Ad Alta, Amplia, Accendatech, and Lassen, outside the submitted work. PFD served on an unpaid advisory committee at Boehringer Ingleheim, and reports receiving non-financial support for serving as a site-principal investigator for Bristol Myers and Genentech, outside the submitted work. RV reports grants from Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, and Sun Pharma, outside the submitted work. PGC reports grants from InterMune, outside the submitted work. KRF reports grants and personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim; personal fees from Roche/Genentech, Bellerophon, Respivant, Shionogi, DevPro, AstraZeneca, Pure Health, Horizon, Fibrogen, Sun Pharmaceuticals, Pliant, United Therapeutics, Arrowhead, Lupin, Polarean, Pure Tech, Trevi Pharmaceuticals, CSL Behring, Daewong, DevPro, Dispersol, Immumet, and NeRRe Therapeutics, outside the submitted work. LT reports personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim outside the submitted work. MBS reports grants from Boehringer Ingelheim, Veracyte, and Genentech; financial support from Genentech, United Therapeutics, Veracyte; honoraria from Boehringer Ingelheim, United Therapeutics, and Veracyte, and meeting and travel support from Genentech and the American College of Chest Physicians. NC reports personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim, Redex, Novartis, Liminal Biosciences, Vicor Pharma, Bridge Biotherapeutics, and Roche, outside the submitted work. DAL reports grants from Boehringer Ingelheim and grants and personal fees from Calyx, outside the submitted work; DAL has a patent issued on systems and methods for automatic detection and quantification of pathology using dynamic feature classification (US10706533B2). DCC reports that Roche/Genentech provided the investigational medicinal product free of charge during the study; and that he served as principal investigator for a trial site in a Roche sponsored study outside the submitted work, in which per patient fees were paid to the site. MK reports grants from Genentech, during the study; grants from Canadian Pulmonary Fibrosis Foundation and Canadian Institute for Health Research; an allowance as chief editor from European Respiratory Journal; grants and personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and Roche Canada; and personal fees from Horizon, Algernon, CSL Behring, and DevPro; and served as a site principal investigator for industry sponsored clinical trials (Roche and Boehringer Ingelheim); outside the submitted work. GR served as a consultant/steering committee member for IPF and PPF studies for Roche/Genentech and served on a data safety monitoring board for an IPF study (Avalyn), outside the submitted work. HJG reports receiving support to participate as a member of the Clinical Coordinating Center and coprincipal investigator, from Genentech, during the study. FAW is currently an employee at Avalyn. IOR reports grants from Genentech/Roche, during the conduct of the study and personal fees from Genentech/Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, and Immunomet, outside the submitted work. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Dysphagia occurs in multiple respiratory pathophysiologies, increasing the risk of pulmonary complications secondary to aspiration. Reflux associated aspiration and a dysregulated lung microbiome is implicated in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis (IPF), but swallowing dysfunction has not been described. We aimed to explore oropharyngeal swallowing in IPF patients, without known swallowing dysfunction., Methods: Fourteen consecutive outpatients with a secure diagnosis of IPF were recruited and the 10-item Eating Assessment Tool (Eat 10) used to assess patient perception of swallowing difficulty. Oropharyngeal swallowing was assessed in ten patients using Videofluoroscopy Swallow Studies (VFSS). The studies were rated using validated scales: Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS); standardised Modified Barium Swallow Impairment Profile (MBSImP)., Results: EAT-10 scores indicated frank swallowing difficulty in 4/14 patients. Videofluoroscopy Studies showed that 3/10 patients had airway penetration, and one aspirated liquid without a cough response. Median MBSImp for oral impairment was 5, range [3-7] and pharyngeal impairment 4, range [1-14] indicating, overall mild alteration to swallowing physiology., Conclusion: We conclude that people with IPF can show a range of swallowing dysfunction, including aspiration into an unprotected airway. To our knowledge, this is the first report on swallowing physiology and safety in IPF. We believe a proportion of this group may be at risk of aspiration. Further work is indicated to fully explore swallowing in this vulnerable group., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Galectin (Gal)-3 is a profibrotic β-galactoside-binding lectin that plays a key role in the pathogenesis of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and IPF exacerbations. TD139 is a novel and potent small-molecule inhibitor of Gal-3.A randomised, double-blind, multicentre, placebo-controlled, phase 1/2a study was conducted to assess the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of inhaled TD139 in 36 healthy subjects and 24 patients with IPF. Six dose cohorts of six healthy subjects were evaluated (4:2 TD139:placebo ratio) with single doses of TD139 (0.15-50 mg) and three dose cohorts of eight patients with IPF (5:3 TD139:placebo ratio) with once-daily doses of TD139 (0.3-10 mg) for 14 days.Inhaled TD139 was well tolerated with no significant treatment-related side-effects. TD139 was rapidly absorbed, with mean time taken to reach maximum plasma concentration ( C max ) values ranging from 0.6 to 3 h and a plasma half-life ( T 1/2 ) of 8 h. The concentration of TD139 in the lung was >567-fold higher than in the blood, with systemic exposure predicting exposure in the target compartment. Gal-3 expression on alveolar macrophages was reduced in the 3 and 10 mg dose groups compared with placebo, with a concentration-dependent inhibition demonstrated. Inhibition of Gal-3 expression in the lung was associated with reductions in plasma biomarkers centrally relevant to IPF pathobiology (platelet-derived growth factor-BB, plasminogen activator inhibitor-1, Gal-3, CCL18 and YKL-40).TD139 is safe and well tolerated in healthy subjects and IPF patients. It was shown to suppress Gal-3 expression on bronchoalveolar lavage macrophages and, in a concerted fashion, decrease plasma biomarkers associated with IPF progression., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: N. Hirani reports grants from Galecto Biotech, during the conduct of the study. Conflict of interest: A.C. MacKinnon reports personal fees from Galecto Biotech, outside the submitted work; and has a patent CA2,794,066 issued, a patent US13/832,672 issued and a patent WO/2014/067986 pending (all patents are fully owned by Galecto Biotech). Conflict of interest: L. Nicol reports grants from Galecto Biotech, during the conduct of the study; personal fees for lectures from Boehringer Ingelheim, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: P. Ford reports personal fees and nonfinancial support from Galecto, during the conduct of the study; and has a patent TD139 issued. Conflict of interest: H. Schambye reports personal fees from Galecto Inc, outside the submitted work; and has a patent WO/2016/180483 pending (fully owned by Galecto Biotech). Conflict of interest: A. Pedersen reports personal fees from Galecto Biotech, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: U.J. Nilsson has a patent CA2,794,066 issued, a patent US13/832,672 issued, a patent WO/2014/067986 pending, a patent WO/2005/113569 pending and a patent WO/2009/139719 pending (all patents are fully owned by Galecto Biotech). Conflict of interest: H. Leffler has a patent CA2,794,066 issued, a patent US13/832,672 issued, a patent WO/2014/067986 pending and a patent WO/2005/113569 pending (all patents are fully owned by Galecto Biotech). Conflict of interest: T. Sethi reports personal fees from Galecto Biotech, outside the submitted work; and has a patent CA2,794,066 issued, a patent US13/832,672 issued and a patent WO/2014/067986 pending (patents are fully owned by Galecto Biotech). Conflict of interest: S. Tantawi reports personal fees from Galecto Biotech, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: L. Gravelle reports personal fees from Galecto Biotech, outside the submitted work; and has a patent WO/2017/103109 pending (fully owned by Galecto Biotech). Conflict of interest: R.J. Slack reports personal fees from Galecto Biotech, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: R. Mills has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: U. Karmakar has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: D. Humphries has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: F. Zetterberg reports personal fees from Galecto Biotech, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: L. Keeling has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: L. Paul has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: P.L. Molyneaux has, via his institution, received industry-academic funding from AstraZeneca and has received speaker and consultancy fees from Boehringer Ingelheim and Hoffman-La Roche, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: F. Li has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: W. Funston has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: I.A. Forrest reports personal fees for consultancy and meeting attendance from Boehringer Ingelheim, personal fees for lectures and meeting attendance from Roche Ltd, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: A.J. Simpson has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M.A. Gibbons has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: T.M. Maher has, via his institution, received industry-academic funding from AstraZeneca and GlaxoSmithKline R&D, and has received consultancy or speaker fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Blade Therapeutics, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Galapagos, GlaxoSmithKline R&D, Indalo, Novartis, Pliant, Respivant, Roche and Samumed., (Copyright ©ERS 2021.)

Rationale: The impact of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) on patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) has not been established. Objectives: To assess outcomes in patients with ILD hospitalized for COVID-19 versus those without ILD in a contemporaneous age-, sex-, and comorbidity-matched population. Methods: An international multicenter audit of patients with a prior diagnosis of ILD admitted to the hospital with COVID-19 between March 1 and May 1, 2020, was undertaken and compared with patients without ILD, obtained from the ISARIC4C (International Severe Acute Respiratory and Emerging Infection Consortium Coronavirus Clinical Characterisation Consortium) cohort, admitted with COVID-19 over the same period. The primary outcome was survival. Secondary analysis distinguished idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis from non-idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis ILD and used lung function to determine the greatest risks of death. Measurements and Main Results: Data from 349 patients with ILD across Europe were included, of whom 161 were admitted to the hospital with laboratory or clinical evidence of COVID-19 and eligible for propensity score matching. Overall mortality was 49% (79/161) in patients with ILD with COVID-19. After matching, patients with ILD with COVID-19 had significantly poorer survival (hazard ratio [HR], 1.60; confidence interval, 1.17-2.18; P  = 0.003) than age-, sex-, and comorbidity-matched controls without ILD. Patients with an FVC of <80% had an increased risk of death versus patients with FVC ≥80% (HR, 1.72; 1.05-2.83). Furthermore, obese patients with ILD had an elevated risk of death (HR, 2.27; 1.39-3.71). Conclusions: Patients with ILD are at increased risk of death from COVID-19, particularly those with poor lung function and obesity. Stringent precautions should be taken to avoid COVID-19 in patients with ILD.

Background: Cough is a common, disabling symptom of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), which may be exacerbated by acid reflux. Inhibiting gastric acid secretion could potentially reduce cough. This study aimed to determine the feasibility of a larger, multicentre trial of omeprazole for cough in IPF, to assess safety and to quantify cough., Methods: Single-centre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled pilot trial of the proton pump inhibitor (PPI) omeprazole (20 mg twice daily for 3 months) in patients with IPF. Primary objectives were to assess feasibility and acceptability of trial procedures. The primary clinical outcome was cough frequency., Results: Forty-five participants were randomised (23 to omeprazole, 22 to placebo), with 40 (20 in each group) having cough monitoring before and after treatment. 280 patients were screened to yield these numbers, with barriers to discontinuing antacids the single biggest reason for non-recruitment. Recruitment averaged 1.5 participants per month. Geometric mean cough frequency at the end of treatment, adjusted for baseline, was 39.1% lower (95% CI 66.0% lower to 9.3% higher) in the omeprazole group compared with placebo. Omeprazole was well tolerated and adverse event profiles were similar in both groups, although there was a small excess of lower respiratory tract infection and a small fall in forced expiratory volume and forced vital capacity associated with omeprazole., Conclusions: A large randomised controlled trial of PPIs for cough in IPF appears feasible and justified but should address barriers to randomisation and incorporate safety assessments in relation to respiratory infection and changes in lung function., Competing Interests: Competing interests: JAS is a named inventor on a patent describing methods for detecting cough from sound recordings. The patent is owned by Manchester University Foundation Trust and licensed to Vitalograph, with whom JAS collaborates. She has received no royalties to date. None of the other authors have any interests to declare., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

After MDT work-up and review, gastro-oesophageal reflux and pulmonary aspiration were found to be common in IPF patients; surgery was recommended in only 10% http://ow.ly/rO3T30lU17o., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: None declared.

Background: Previous studies have shown that findings of computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) relate to outcome in pulmonary embolus (PE). These include clot burden as quantified using an obstruction index and markers of pressure overload such as right ventricle to left ventricle size ratio (RV/LV ratio). Little data exists correlating these findings with clinical presentation and biomarkers., Aim: To explore the link between clinical presentation and biomarkers with CTPA findings., Methods: Retrospective case note analysis of consecutive cases presenting to a large teaching hospital. An independent radiologist reviewed CTPAs and clot burden quantified using an obstruction index., Results: One hundred and seventy cases were identified and notes retrieved in 137 cases. (i), Clinical Presentation: correlation was seen between clot burden and systolic blood pressure (BP) (r = -0.299, P = 0.0006) and heart rate (r = 0.240, P = 0.0056). Median obstruction index was significantly higher in those with a presenting BP <90 mmHg [41.25% (95% CI 30-50) vs. 15% (95% CI 12.5-25), (P = 0.0004)]. Clot burden was significantly higher in patients with temperature of >37.5 degrees C [30% (95% CI 25.0-42.5) vs. 15% (95% CI 12.5-28.3), P = 0.02)] and (ii)Biomarkers: significant correlation between clot burden and D-dimer was seen (r = 0.36, P = 0.0001). Location of thrombus was associated with significant differences in D-dimer level. A subgroup of patients had cardiac biomarkers measured (n = 24). There was a statistically significant correlation between troponin I and clot burden (r = 0.412, P = 0.048) and RV/LV ratio (r = 0.699, P = 0.0013)., Discussion: These findings suggest that clinical parameters and biomarkers have a role in predicting the radiological severity of PE. These data support the need for further studies of risk stratification in patients presenting with acute PE.

Chronic allograft dysfunction, manifesting as bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS), is the major cause of morbidity and mortality in human lung transplant recipients. While alloimmunity has a definite role, there is increasing interest in overall allograft injury and subsequent inflammation and remodeling. This review deals with nonalloimmune factors that may potentiate alloimmune injury. We discuss infection and reflux/aspiration as examples of allograft injury, which may lead to chronic loss of graft function and BOS. Surgical and nonsurgical treatments aimed at preventing these insults and improving survival are considered. The need for further evidence, including randomized-controlled trials, to evaluate the role of medical and surgical therapies is emphasized by the current literature.

Background: The bronchial epithelium is a source of mediators that may play a role in the airway inflammation and remodeling of post-transplant obliterative bronchiolitis (OB). Traditional strategies have failed to have an impact on OB. Recent studies have suggested a role for azithromycin in managing the condition. In this study we aimed to determine the effect of azithromycin on LPS-mediated epithelial release of factors relevant to airway neutrophilia and remodeling in a unique population of primary bronchial epithelial cells (PBECs) derived from stable lung allografts., Methods: PBECs were established from bronchial brushings of stable lung transplant recipients and treated with lipopolysaccharide (LPS, 0.1, 1 and 10 microg/ml) for 48 hours. Interleukin-8 (IL-8), granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) protein levels were measured by Luminex analyzer. PBECs were then incubated with LPS and azithromycin, and protein levels were again determined., Results: LPS caused a significant increase in IL-8 and GM-CSF at concentrations of 1 and 10 microg/ml, with no effect on VEGF release. Azithromycin caused a significant decrease in the LPS-stimulated IL-8 and GM-CSF release., Conclusions: LPS upregulates release of IL-8 and GM-CSF from PBECs derived from stable lung allografts. Sub-microbicidal concentrations of azithromycin attenuate this and may, therefore, alleviate infection-driven neutrophilic airway inflammation and remodeling in the allograft airway.

Mechanisms other than classical alloimmunity are implicated in the pathogenesis of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS). It was hypothesised that antimicrobial peptides (AMPs), elements of the innate immune response, have a role in BOS pathogenesis. Pulmonary expression of the neutrophil-derived AMPs human cathelicidin (hCAP)-18/LL-37 and alpha-defensins (human neutrophil peptides (HNP) 1-3), and the epithelial cell-derived AMPs human beta-defensin (hBD)-2, elafin and secretory leukoprotease inhibitor (SLPI) were measured in stable lung transplant recipients and those with BOS. The relationship between airway pathogens and AMP levels was examined. Bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) was performed on 44 lung transplant recipients (30 stable, 14 with BOS). BAL was cultured for pathogens and ELISA for AMPs was performed. The presence of airway pathogens was associated with significantly increased levels of neutrophil-derived and epithelial-derived AMPs. When patients without pathogens in BAL fluid were analysed, eight recipients with BOS had elevated hCAP-18/LL-37 and HNP 1-3 compared with 25 stable recipients. hBD-2 and elafin levels were comparable in BOS and stable recipients, but SLPI levels were reduced in BOS. Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome is associated with elevated airway human cathelicidin 18/LL-37 and human neutrophil peptides 1-3 from activated neutrophils, even in the absence of pathogens. Together with reduced airway secretory leukoprotease inhibitor this may favour nonalloimmune airway injury with reduced antiprotease defence and increased neutrophil degranulation.

Obliterative bronchiolitis (OB), the major cause of chronic lung allograft dysfunction, is characterized by airway neutrophilia, inflammation, and remodeling, with progressive fibroproliferation and obliteration of small airways that ultimately leads to patient death. Statins have potential anti-inflammatory effects and have been demonstrated to confer a survival advantage in lung transplant patients. We postulated that the beneficial effects of simvastatin in lung transplantation are in part due to inhibition of the epithelial production of key mediators of neutrophil chemotaxis, inflammation, and airway remodeling. Our objective was to assess the effect of simvastatin on a unique population of primary bronchial epithelial cells (PBECs) derived from stable lung allografts, with specific reference to airway neutrophilia and remodeling. PBEC cultures were stimulated with IL-17 or transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta, with and without simvastatin. Supernatant levels of factors critical to driving airway neutrophilia and remodeling were measured. IL-17 upregulated IL-8, IL-6, granulocyte colony-stimulating factor, granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), and VEGF, whereas TGF-beta increased IL-6, GM-CSF, matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-2, and MMP-9. Simvastatin attenuated effects of both IL-17 and TGF-beta. We have demonstrated the ability of simvastatin to attenuate release of airway neutrophilic and remodeling mediators and to inhibit their upregulation by TGF-beta and IL-17. These data illustrate the potential of simvastatin to alleviate neutrophilic airway inflammation and remodeling in the transplanted lung and may have additional relevance to other neutrophilic airway conditions, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Background: Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS) remains the major cause of long-term morbidity and mortality after lung transplantation, and new therapeutic measures are needed. We speculated that cilomilast might reduce mediators of airway inflammation and angiogenesis from the airway epithelium, supporting a potential value in the treatment of BOS. We used an ex vivo primary bronchial epithelial cell culture (PBEC) model to investigate this hypothesis. Increasing evidence suggests the epithelium is central in stimulating both inflammatory and proliferative responses in the airway., Methods: Bronchial brushings were taken from 7 stable lung allograft recipients and were used to establish sub-confluent PBECs. The effect of incubation for 48 hours with 0.1 to 10 micromol/liter cilomilast on basal production of interleukin (IL)-8, IL-6, granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GMCSF), and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) were assayed by multiplex analyser., Results: There was a dose dependent fall in basal IL-8 and GMCSF levels with cilomilast. Median change for IL-8 was -25% (range, -66% to 5%; p = 0.035) at 1 micromol/liter , and -40% (range, -72% to -20; p = 0.022) at 10 micromol/liter. Median GMSCF change was -34% (range, -70% to 16%; p = 0.05) at 1 micromol/liter, and 37% (range, -80% to -8%; p = 0.04) at 10 micromol/liter. There were no effects on VEGF., Conclusion: The phosphodiesterase type IV inhibitor cilomilast reduced IL-8 and GMCSF release from PBECs. These cytokines are associated with the persistence of airway neutrophilic inflammation and airway remodelling seen in obliterative bronchiolitis. These ex vivo results suggest a potential for cilomilast in the treatment of BOS, which would need to be evaluated in appropriate clinical studies.

Long-term survival in lung transplantation is limited by the development of obliterative bronchiolitis, a condition characterised by inflammation, epithelial injury, fibroproliferation and obliteration of bronchioles leading to airflow obstruction. To investigate the role of the bronchial epithelium in the pathogenesis of obliterative bronchiolitis the current study aimed to establish primary bronchial epithelial cell cultures (PBEC) from lung allografts. Four to six bronchial brushings were obtained from sub-segmental bronchi of lung allografts. Cells were seeded onto collagen-coated plates and grown to confluence in bronchial epithelial growth medium. Bronchial brushings (n=33) were obtained from 27 patients. PBECs were grown to confluence from 12 out of 33 (39%) brushings. Failure to reach confluence was due to early innate infection. Bacteria were usually isolated from both bronchoalveolar lavage and culture media, but a separate population was identified in culture media only. Primary culture of bronchial epithelial cells from lung transplant recipients is feasible, despite a high rate of early, patient-derived infection. Latent infection of the allograft, identified only by bronchial brushings, may itself be a persistent stimulus for epithelial injury. This technique facilitates future mechanistic studies of airway epithelial responses in the pathogenesis of obliterative bronchiolitis.

Background: A biologically plausible link between gastro-oesophageal reflux (GOR), aspiration, and lung allograft dysfunction has been suggested, but there is no systematic evidence indicating the presence of gastric contents in the lung. We have tested the hypothesis that pepsin, as a marker of aspiration, is detectable in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid of allograft recipients who had not reported symptoms of GOR., Methods: Standardised 3 x 60 ml surveillance BAL fluid samples from 13 chronologically sequential stable lung allograft recipients without chronic rejection (10 patients treated with a prophylactic proton pump inhibitor) were studied. Lavage supernatants were assayed by an ELISA based on a monospecific goat antibody for pepsin/pepsinogen. Pepsin levels were compared with those from four normal volunteer controls., Results: Pepsin levels were measurable in all allograft recipients, in keeping with gastric aspiration (median 109 ng/ml (range 35-1375)). In the control group the pepsin levels were below the limit of detection. Treatment with a proton pump inhibitor was not correlated with pepsin levels. There was no correlation between BAL fluid neutrophils and pepsin levels., Conclusion: These data demonstrate lung epithelial lining fluid concentrations of pepsin in lung allograft recipients which are much higher than blood reference levels, with no detectable pepsin in controls. This provides direct evidence of gastric aspiration, which is potentially injurious to the allograft.

Background: Obliterative bronchiolitis in chronic rejection of lung allografts is characterised by airway epithelial damage and fibrosis. The process whereby normal epithelium is lost and replaced by fibroblastic scar tissue is poorly understood, but recent findings suggest that epithelial cells can become fibroblasts through epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT). It is hypothesised that EMT occurs in lung allografts and plays a potential role in airway remodelling., Methods: Sixteen stable lung transplant recipients underwent bronchoscopy with bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL), endobronchial biopsies, and bronchial brushings. Biopsy sections were stained for the fibroblast marker S100A4. Brushings were cultured on collagen, stained with anti-S100A4, and examined for further EMT markers including matrix metalloproteinase (MMP) zymographic activity and epithelial invasion through collagen coated filters., Results: A median 15% (0-48%) of the biopsy epithelium stained for S100A4 in stable lung transplant recipients and MMP-7 co-localisation was observed. In non-stimulated epithelial cultures from lung allografts, S100A4 staining was identified with MMP-2 and MMP-9 production and zymographic activity. MMP total protein and activity was increased following stimulation with transforming growth factor (TGF)-beta1. Non-stimulated transplant epithelial cells were invasive and penetration of collagen coated filters increased following TGF-beta1 stimulation., Conclusions: This study provides evidence of EMT markers in lung allografts of patients without loss of lung function. The EMT process may represent a final common pathway following injury in more common diseases characterised by airway remodelling.

Renal, hepatic, and lung allografts are compromised by aggressively deteriorating function. This chronic process is produced by an overall burden of organ damage, but the pathophysiology remains poorly understood. Rates of chronic rejection in the lung, for example, have not substantially improved over the last decade, despite new immunosuppressive drugs and improvements in surgical procedure. We present a hypothesis that epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition is a common cause of chronic allograft failure. Research in this area may provide insights into chronic rejection of kidney, liver, and lung allografts that impact on future therapeutic strategies.

Introduction: Chronic rejection is a major problem for all lung transplant programmes, which is functionally manifested by fixed airflow limitation, Bronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome (BOS). The inclusion of a Pre-BOS category, BOS(0 approximately p), in newly revised guidelines, recognizes the potential importance of early changes. We have previously demonstrated reticular basement membrane (Rbm) thickening in clinically stable lung transplant recipients free from BOS. The present study extends this, testing the hypothesis that inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) therapy will lead to a decrease in Rbm thickness in lung transplant recipients., Methods: A parallel group, bronchoscopic intervention study of clinically stable lung allograft recipients, free from BOS, but with evidence of airway inflammation. Following baseline assessment of Rbm thickening, subjects were randomized to 3 months of either chlorofluorocarbon-driven beclomethasone diproprionate (BDP) 400 microg b.i.d., or a formulation designed to yield at least an equivalent dose, hydrofluoroalkane-driven BDP, 200 microg b.i.d., Results: Three months treatment with a moderate dose of ICS, including a formulation designed for preferential small airway deposition, had no effect on Rbm thickening (13+/-3 vs. 14+/-5 microm post-ICS)., Conclusion: Our data would suggest that airway remodelling can occur early in lung allografts and is not affected by moderate dose ICS therapy. Longitudinal studies are required to describe the pathophysiological processes involved in BOS, and specifically to elucidate potential relationships between airway remodelling, airflow obstruction and allograft failure.

Inhaled epoprostenol (prostacyclin) may be used in the treatment of severe pulmonary hypertension, improving oxygenation and reducing pulmonary artery pressures. We have observed symptomatic benefits of epoprostenol in patients with congenital heart disease that extend beyond acute haemodynamic effects of the drug, which has a short biological half-life. The aim of this study was to examine the effects of epoprostenol in patients and normal subjects on exhaled nitric oxide (eNO), based on the hypothesis that the drug may alter the resting vasoconstrictor/vasodilator balance. Nine patients with pulmonary hypertension complicating left-to-right cardiac shunts and nine healthy controls received 100 microgram of nebulized epoprostenol. Exhaled eNO was measured, using a chemiluminescence method, before, immediately after and 18 h after nebulization. There was no significant difference between the two groups in baseline eNO or eNO immediately following nebulized epoprostenol. Epoprostenol produced a delayed elevation in eNO 18 h after nebulization in patients, but not in normal controls. This study supports the concept that epoprostenol, while having no effect on the normal pulmonary circulation, acts on the hypertensive circulation via a mechanism that may result in a delayed alteration of vasoconstrictor/vasodilator balance.