1. The importance of assessing the ghosting phenomenon in dynamic footprints when estimating stature – Forensic implications.
- Author
-
Švábová, Petra, Hanzelyová, Katarína, Chovancová, Mária, Masnicová, Soňa, and Beňuš, Radoslav
- Subjects
TOES ,FOOTPRINTS ,STATURE ,YOUNG adults ,LENGTH measurement ,CRIME scenes ,SEX (Biology) ,ESTIMATES - Abstract
• Ghosting occurred most frequently on the 1st and 2nd toe of the footprint. • Ghosting was present on all ten toes of the footprints in only 2.94% of participants. • Footprint measurements with ghosting are significantly higher. • More accurate estimates of stature are from measurements with ghosting. In cases where multiple footprints are found at a crime scene, it is unusual that all are static, and some are likely dynamic. Depending on how the footprint was made, we distinguish between dynamic and static footprints. A distinguishing feature that has only recently been associated with dynamic footprints is the fact that dynamic footprints differ from static footprints by the presence of additional markings around the back of the heel and the tops of the toe prints, the so-called ghosting phenomenon. The present study aims to analyse the ghosting phenomenon on dynamic footprints – its occurrence in relation to sex, laterality, and different areas of footprints as well as length features. Additionally, it aims to investigate the assessment of the ghosting phenomenon on dynamic footprints when estimating stature for biological profiling in the forensic field. The study sample comprised of 170 young adults aged 18 – 30 years of both biological sexes. Stature was measured and dynamic footprints were obtained where the ghosting phenomenon was analysed together with length measurements of the same footprint with and without ghosting. In the first and second toes of footprints, the ghosting phenomenon occurred most frequently in both sexes and in the sex-mixed group. Sex differences were not significant in ghosting occurrence on right and left footprints (p > 0.05), except for the area of the left fifth toe (p = 0.045). All the footprints' lengths with ghosting were significantly higher (p < 0.001) than those without ghosting. Statures calculated from footprint length measurements with ghosting predicted stature more accurately than statures calculated from the same footprint length measurements without ghosting. In the case of finding dynamic footprints at crime scenes, it is necessary to correctly identify and evaluate ghosting of the footprint. This comparison can be helpful in interpreting how ghosting should be taken into account when estimating a person's stature. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF