1. The Direct Impact Effect of Different Foot Orthotic Designs on the Plantar Loading of Patients with Structural Hallux Limitus: A Quasi-Experimental Study.
- Author
-
Martinez-Rico, Magdalena, Gijon-Nogueron, Gabriel, Ortega-Avila, Ana Belen, Roche-Seruendo, Luis Enrique, Climent-Pedrosa, Ana, Sanchis-Sales, Enrique, and Deschamps, Kevin
- Subjects
FOOT orthoses ,CHIEF financial officers ,DISPLACEMENT (Psychology) ,ARTIFICIAL rubber ,TOES ,FOOT ,SHOES - Abstract
Background: This study examines the effect of two types of custom-made foot orthoses (CFOs) in patients with structural hallux limitus (SHL). Methods: In this quasi-experimental, repeated measures study, 24 participants with SHL were sampled. Two CFOs—cut-out CFO and anterior stabilizer element (AFSE) CFO—were compared using minimalist SAGURO neoprene shoes: no foot orthoses (FO), cut-out CFO, and AFSE CFO. Plantar pressures and center of pressure (CoP) displacement were measured using a Podoprint
® platform. Results: Both CFOs shifted the CoP medially during midstance (p < 0.001 with AFSE CFO and p = 0.0036 with cut-out CFO). The AFSE CFO showed a more anterior CoP in midstance, while the cut-out CFO affected anterior CoP in midstance and pre-swing. The AFSE CFO significantly increased pressure in the second toe, lesser metatarsal heads (MTH), midfoot, and rearfoot. In contrast, the cut-out CFO decreased pressure in the second MTH and lesser toe regions, increasing pressure in the midfoot and heel. Both CFOs lowered the hallux/first MTH ratio compared to shod without CFO. Conclusions: The cut-out CFO led to medial and anterior CoP displacement, reducing lateral foot and hallux pressure while transferring loads to the first MTH. The AFSE CFO caused a similar shift by increasing loads on the first MTH. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF