Search

This paper describes the new TPTP format for representing interpretations. It provides a background survey that helped us ensure that the representation format is adequate for different types of interpretations: Tarskian, Herbrand, and Kripke interpretations. The needs of applications that use models are considered. The syntax and semantics of the new format is expounded in detail, with multiple examples. Verification of models is discussed. Some tools that support processing the new format are noted. The properties of interpretations represented in the new format are discussed.

Deciding formulas mixing arithmetic and uninterpreted predicates is of practical interest, notably for applications in verification. Some decision procedures consist in building by structural induction an automaton that recognizes the set of models of the formula under analysis, and then testing whether this automaton accepts a non-empty language. A drawback is that universal quantification is usually handled by a reduction to existential quantification and complementation. For logical formalisms in which models are encoded as infinite words, this hinders the practical use of this method due to the difficulty of complementing infinite-word automata. The contribution of this paper is to introduce an algorithm for directly computing the effect of universal first-order quantifiers on automata recognizing sets of models, for formulas involving natural numbers encoded in unary notation. This makes it possible to apply the automata-based approach to obtain implementable decision procedures for various arithmetic theories.

First-order logic fragments mixing quantifiers, arithmetic, and uninterpreted predicates are often undecidable, as is, for instance, Presburger arithmetic extended with a single uninterpreted unary predicate. In the SMT world, difference logic is a quite popular fragment of linear arithmetic which is less expressive than Presburger arithmetic. Difference logic on integers with uninterpreted unary predicates is known to be decidable, even in the presence of quantifiers. We here show that (quantified) difference logic on real numbers with a single uninterpreted unary predicate is undecidable, quite surprisingly. Moreover, we prove that difference logic on integers, together with order on reals, combined with uninterpreted unary predicates, remains decidable., Comment: This is the preprint for the submission published in CADE-29. It also includes an additional detailed proof in the appendix. The Version of Record of this contribution will be published in CADE-29

This volume contains the post-proceedings of the Seventeenth Logical and Semantic Frameworks with Applications (LSFA 2022), organised by the Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Brasil. Because of the COVID-19 pandemic, the meeting was held hybridly, on September 23-24, 2022. LSFA aims to bring together researchers and students interested in theoretical and practical aspects of logical and semantic frameworks and their applications. The covered topics include proof theory, type theory and rewriting theory, specification and deduction languages, and formal semantics of languages and systems.

The first iteration of the proof format used by the SMT solver veriT was presented ten years ago at the first PxTP workshop. Since then the format has matured. veriT proofs are used within multiple applications, and other solvers generate proofs in the same format. We would now like to gather feedback from the community to guide future developments. Towards this, we review the history of the format, present our pragmatic approach to develop the format, and also discuss problems that might arise when other solvers use the format., Comment: In Proceedings PxTP 2021, arXiv:2107.01544

SMT solvers generally tackle quantifiers by instantiating their variables with tuples of terms from the ground part of the formula. Recent enumerative approaches for quantifier instantiation consider tuples of terms in some heuristic order. This paper studies different strategies to order such tuples and their impact on performance. We decouple the ordering problem into two parts. First is the order of the sequence of terms to consider for each quantified variable, and second is the order of the instantiation tuples themselves. While the most and least preferred tuples, i.e. those with all variables assigned to the most or least preferred terms, are clear, the combinations in between allow flexibility in an implementation. We look at principled strategies of complete enumeration, where some strategies are more fair, meaning they treat all the variables the same but some strategies may be more adventurous, meaning that they may venture further down the preference list. We further describe new techniques for discarding irrelevant instantiations which are crucial for the performance of these strategies in practice. These strategies are implemented in the SMT solver cvc5, where they contribute to the diversification of the solver's configuration space, as shown by our experimental results.

Algebraic datatypes, and among them lists and trees, have attracted a lot of interest in automated reasoning and Satisfiability Modulo Theories (SMT). Since its latest stable version, the SMT-LIB standard defines a theory of algebraic datatypes, which is currently supported by several mainstream SMT solvers. In this paper, we study this particular theory of datatypes and prove that it is strongly polite, showing also how it can be combined with other arbitrary disjoint theories using polite combination. Our results cover both inductive and finite datatypes, as well as their union. The combination method uses a new, simple, and natural notion of additivity, that enables deducing strong politeness from (weak) politeness.

Satisfiability modulo theories (SMT) solvers have throughout the years been able to cope with increasingly expressive formulas, from ground logics to full first-order logic modulo theories. Nevertheless, higher-order logic within SMT is still little explored. One main goal of the Matryoshka project, which started in March 2017, is to extend the reasoning capabilities of SMT solvers and other automatic provers beyond first-order logic. In this preliminary report, we report on an extension of the SMT-LIB language, the standard input format of SMT solvers, to handle higher-order constructs. We also discuss how to augment the proof format of the SMT solver veriT to accommodate these new constructs and the solving techniques they require., Comment: In Proceedings PxTP 2017, arXiv:1712.00898

Quantifier-free nonlinear arithmetic (QF_NRA) appears in many applications of satisfiability modulo theories solving (SMT). Accordingly, efficient reasoning for corresponding constraints in SMT theory solvers is highly relevant. We propose a new incomplete but efficient and terminating method to identify satisfiable instances. The method is derived from the subtropical method recently introduced in the context of symbolic computation for computing real zeros of single very large multivariate polynomials. Our method takes as input conjunctions of strict polynomial inequalities, which represent more than 40% of the QF_NRA section of the SMT-LIB library of benchmarks. The method takes an abstraction of polynomials as exponent vectors over the natural numbers tagged with the signs of the corresponding coefficients. It then uses, in turn, SMT to solve linear problems over the reals to heuristically find suitable points that translate back to satisfying points for the original problem. Systematic experiments on the SMT-LIB demonstrate that our method is not a sufficiently strong decision procedure by itself but a valuable heuristic to use within a portfolio of techniques., Comment: Accepted into Proc. FROCOS 2017

The satisfiability problem in real closed fields is decidable. In the context of satisfiability modulo theories, the problem restricted to conjunctive sets of literals, that is, sets of polynomial constraints, is of particular importance. One of the central problems is the computation of good explanations of the unsatisfiability of such sets, i.e.\ obtaining a small subset of the input constraints whose conjunction is already unsatisfiable. We adapt two commonly used real quantifier elimination methods, cylindrical algebraic decomposition and virtual substitution, to provide such conflict sets and demonstrate the performance of our method in practice.