Search

Objective: There is a need for a widely accepted comprehensive disease activity measure for use in daily practice in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). For this reason, the 3-item Visual Analogue Scale (3VAS) and 4-item Visual Analogue Scale (4VAS) were developed. This study aimed to test construct validity and responsiveness of the 3VAS and 4VAS in a population of patients with newly diagnosed PsA receiving usual care., Methods: Components of the 3VAS (physician global, patient global, patient skin) and 4VAS (physician global, patient pain, patient joint, patient skin) were scored on 0-10 VAS scales. Agreement of low disease activity (LDA) state between 3VAS/4VAS and other composite measures was tested using Venn diagrams. Construct validity and responsiveness (3-month interval) were assessed using Spearman correlation coefficients and standardised response means (SRM) with effect sizes (ES), respectively, following hypothesis generation. Both 3VAS/4VAS were also compared with several patient-reported outcome measures., Results: Data from 629 patients were used. Both 3VAS (ES=0.48, SRM 0.52) and 4VAS (ES=0.48, SRM=0.50) showed responsiveness similar to Disease Activity in PSoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) and Disease Activity Score-28 (DAS28). Both measures had a strong correlation with DAPSA (r=0.80-0.87), Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS) (r=0.89) and Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3) (r=0.84-0.92). 3VAS and 4VAS had the highest agreement with PASDAS in categorising patients to LDA at 12 months., Conclusion: This is the first study assessing the performance of the 3VAS and 4VAS in an observational cohort of patients with early PsA. Both measures have promising performance characteristics, showing strong correlations and good discrimination with existing composite measures. The 4VAS may be the preferred version with better face validity., Competing Interests: Competing interests: WT has received research funding, consulting or speaker fees from AbbVie, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Janssen, GSK, MSD, Novartis, Ono Pharma, Pfizer and UCB., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Objectives: Achieving low disease activity (LDA) is important in patients with psoriatic arthritis. It is of value to know if health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of patients who reached musculoskeletal low disease activity can be further improved by additionally achieving remission of their psoriasis. So, the aim of this study was to assess HRQoL in patients with active psoriasis who reached disease activity in psoriatic arthritis (DAPSA) LDA after one year of follow-up., Methods: Data were collected from the Dutch south west Psoriatic Arthritis cohort. Musculoskeletal disease activity was measured using DAPSA. Patients who reached DAPSA-LDA after one year were divided based on reaching psoriasis remission (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index [PASI] <1). HRQoL and work productivity were compared between both groups., Results: After one year, 230 (44%) patients with active psoriasis at baseline reached DAPSA-LDA, of which 108 (47%) patients achieved psoriasis remission. The group of patients with active psoriasis (n=122, 53%) contained more men (p=0.023) and scored lower on the 12-item Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease questionnaire (p=0.012). On the Skindex-17 psychosocial subscale, 31% experienced moderate to high impairment and on the symptoms subscale 28% experienced a lot of symptoms. Work productivity did not differ between both groups., Conclusions: The majority of patients with DAPSA-LDA and active psoriasis after one year has a good HRQoL. However, a proportion of these patients still experiences considerable skin burden. We recommend rheumatologists to continue assessing and treating psoriasis to reduce skin burden in PsA patients who achieved musculoskeletal low disease activity.

Objective: Rheumatologists play a pivotal role in the management of patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Due to time constraints during clinic visits, the skin may not receive the attention needed for optimal patient outcome. Therefore, the aim of this study was to select a set of core questions that can help rheumatologists in daily rheumatology clinical practice to identify patients with PsA with a high skin burden., Methods: Baseline data from patients included in the Dutch South West Psoriatic Arthritis (DEPAR) cohort were used. Questions were derived from the Skindex-17 and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) questionnaires. Underlying clusters of questions were identified with an exploratory principal component analysis (PCA) with varimax rotation, after which a 2-parameter logistic model was fitted per cluster. Questions were selected based on their discrimination and difficulty. Subsequently, 2 flowcharts were made with categories of skin burden severity. Clinical considerations were specified per category., Results: In total, 413 patients were included. The PCA showed 2 underlying clusters: a psychosocial domain and a domain assessing physical symptoms. We selected these 2 domains. The psychosocial domain contains 3 questions and specifies 4 categories of skin burden severity. The physical symptoms domain contains 2 questions and categorizes patients in 1 out of 3 categories., Conclusion: We have selected a set with a maximum of 5 questions that rheumatologists can easily implement in their consultation to assess skin burden in patients with PsA. This practical guide makes the assessment of skin burden more accessible to rheumatologists and can aid in clinical decision making., (Copyright © 2022 by the Journal of Rheumatology.)

Objectives: Psoriasis impacts health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in PsA patients. However, this is not adequately measured with a general HRQoL questionnaire. The aim of this study was to quantify the degree of psoriasis evolution in PsA patients over the first year of follow-up and to evaluate whether the impact of psoriasis on HRQoL can be adequately measured with a dermatology-specific HRQoL questionnaire., Methods: Data were used from PsA patients in the Dutch south west Early Psoriatic Arthritis cohort. Psoriasis severity was measured with the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI). Dermatology-specific HRQoL was assessed with the Skindex-17 questionnaire. We used a Sankey diagram to illustrate the evolution of psoriasis severity during the first year of follow-up. To assess the association between psoriasis severity and the symptoms and psychosocial subscale of the Skindex-17, a linear regression analysis with hierarchical variable selection and zero-inflated negative binominal regression analysis were performed, respectively., Results: We included 644 patients; 109 (17%) patients had no psoriasis (PASI = 0), 456 (71%) had mild psoriasis (PASI < 7), 56 (9%) had moderate psoriasis (PASI 7-12) and 23 (4%) had severe psoriasis (PASI > 12). Psoriasis severity did not fluctuate much during the first year. PASI was significantly associated with both subscales of the Skindex-17 at baseline and 12 months., Conclusion: Psoriasis severity in PsA patients is mostly mild but impacts HRQoL when measured using a dermatology-specific HRQoL questionnaire. For optimal management of PsA patients, we recommend rheumatologists acquire information on skin burden by using a dermatology-specific HRQoL questionnaire., (© The Author(s) 2021. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Rheumatology.)

Objectives: We investigated whether local joint swelling recurs in the same joints over time in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who are treated to target., Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed RA participating in the Behandel-Strategieën, "treatment strategies" (BeSt) study (n=508) were followed for median 10 years while receiving Disease Activity Score (DAS) ≤2.4 steered treatment. Every 3 months 68 joints were assessed for the presence of swelling. We evaluated whether baseline local joint swelling was predictive for swelling in the same joint during follow-up using a multilevel mixed-effect logistic regression model. Different strategies were used to account for missing data. A permutation test was performed to assess if joint swelling was better predicted by baseline swelling of the joint itself than by baseline swelling of randomly selected other joints., Results: In 46% of the joints that were swollen at baseline, joint swelling later recurred at least once during follow-up. Joint swelling at baseline was statistically significantly associated with swelling in the same joint during follow-up (OR 2.37, 95% CI 2.30 to 2.43, p<0.001), and also specifically with recurrent swelling in the same joint (OR 1.73, 95% CI 1.37 to 1.59, p<0.001). Local joint swelling was better predicted by baseline swelling of that particular joint than by baseline swelling of other joints (p<0.001)., Conclusion: Joint swelling tends to recur locally in the joints swollen at RA onset. This suggests that local factors influence the manifestation of joint inflammation over time., Competing Interests: Competing interests: The original BeSt study was funded by a research grant from the Dutch College of Health Insurances with additional funding from Schering-Plough BV and Centocor Inc., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)

Background: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a chronic inflammatory autoimmune disease, predominantly affecting joints, which is initially treated with conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (csDMARDs). In RA patients with insufficient response to csDMARDs, the addition of prednisone or tocilizumab, a biological DMARD (bDMARD), to the medication has been shown to be effective in reducing RA symptoms. However, which of these two treatment strategies has superior effectiveness and safety is unknown., Methods: In this multicenter, investigator-initiated, open-label, randomized, pragmatic trial, we aim to recruit 120 RA patients meeting the 2010 ACR/EULAR classification criteria for RA, with active disease defined as a Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) > 10 and at least one swollen joint of the 28 assessed. Patients must be on stable treatment with csDMARDs for ≥ 8 weeks prior to screening and must have been treated with ≥ 2 DMARDs, of which a maximum of one tumor necrosis factor inhibitor (a class of bDMARDs) is allowed. Previous use of other bDMARDs or targeted synthetic DMARDs is not allowed. Patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either tocilizumab (subcutaneously at 162 mg/week) or prednisone (orally at 10 mg/day) as an addition to their current csDMARD therapy. Study visits will be performed at screening; baseline; and months 1, 2, 3, 6, 9, and 12. Study medication will be tapered in case of clinical remission (CDAI ≤ 2.8 and ≤ 1 swollen joint at two consecutive 3-monthly visits) with careful monitoring of disease activity. In case of persistent high disease activity at or after month 3 (CDAI > 22 at any visit or > 10 at two consecutive visits), patients will switch to the other strategy arm. Primary outcome is a change in CDAI from baseline to 12 months. Secondary outcomes are additional clinical response and quality of life measures, drug retention rate, radiographically detectable progression of joint damage, functional ability, and cost utility. Safety outcomes include tocilizumab-associated adverse events (AEs), glucocorticoid-associated AEs, and serious AEs., Discussion: This will be the first randomized clinical trial comparing addition of oral prednisone or of tocilizumab head to head in RA patients with insufficient response to csDMARD therapy. It will yield important information for clinical rheumatology practice., Trial Registration: This trial was prospectively registered in the Netherlands Trial Register on October 7, 2019 (NL8070). The Netherlands Trial Register contains all items from the World Health Organization Trial Registration Data Set.

Viral infections have been associated with a wide spectrum of muscle disorders, ranging from acute nonspecific myalgia to myositis. However, severe rhabdomyolysis, with or without accompanying acute renal failure (ARF), has been described only rarely. We report the fourth case in the literature of recent Coxsackie B virus infection complicated by severe rhabdomyolysis and ARF, necessitating temporary haemodialysis in a previously healthy young man. Although most Coxsackie B virus infections are asymptomatic, one should be aware of this potentially life-threatening complication of this virus. As illustrated with the present case, serological testing may reveal the diagnosis in a case of rhabdomyolysis after a viral illness.