Search

Introduction: Plasma cell leukemia (PCL) can occur de novo as primary PCL (pPCL), or in patients with prior diagnosis of multiple myeloma (MM) as secondary PCL (sPCL). In 2021, the diagnostic criteria have been revised, establishing a new cut-off of ≥5% plasma cells in the peripheral blood. Lacking specific clinical trials, PCL is treated similarly to MM; however, outcome for patients with PCL remains poor. Here, we report outcomes for patients with pPCL and sPCL in the era of novel agents. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis and identified 19 patients (11 pPCL, 8 sPCL) who have been treated for PCL between 2010 and 2022 at University Hospital Essen. Results: Patients with pPCL had a median overall survival (OS) of 37.8 months (95% CI: [15.4; 52.3] months) from diagnosis, with a median time to next treatment (TTNT) of 18.4 (2.0; 22.9) months. All patients were treated with a proteasome-inhibitor (PI)-based induction therapy, and the majority was consolidated with an autologous stem cell transplantation (SCT). Five of these patients received a tandem transplantation. Patients with sPCL had a median OS of only 1.5 months after diagnosis of PCL. Only 1 patient achieved a remission with daratumumab and subsequent allogenic SCT. Conclusion: With our study, we add evidence for a PI-based induction therapy followed by a consolidating autologous SCT for patients with pPCL and give further evidence that a tandem transplant concept might be beneficial. The diagnosis of sPCL remains devastating and needs new therapeutic approaches. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Young adults (YA) represent a minority among recipients of allogeneic haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). In order to describe the outcome of YA following HSCT in Germany, 9299 patients who were registered with the German Registry for Stem Cell Transplantation were included in this retrospective analysis of the years 1998–2019. The impact of the variables, such as patient age and sex, sex differences, stem cell source, donor type, conditioning, year of HSCT, the diagnosis, and the achieved remission status were tested in univariable and multivariable analysis for overall, event‐free and relapse‐free survival as well as for the cumulative incidences of non‐relapse and therapy‐related mortality. Altogether, the outcome of YA after HSCT improved over time and was determined by the underlying disease, the age at disease onset, stem cell source, and donor type. Patients were most likely to die from relapse, and survival of HSCT recipients after 10 years was reduced by more than half in comparison to the general population of YA. Deeper understanding of modifiable risk factors may be gained by studies comparing the outcome of YA post‐HSCT with that of children, adolescents and elderly patients. A deliberate and strong patient selection may further improve mortality rates. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We investigated the effect of center-specific variables on overall survival (OS) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (alloHCT) in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). Eligible were adult patients reported to DRST registry receiving first alloHCT for AML from a related or matched (>= 9/10 HLA-match) unrelated donor 2015-2021. Primary endpoint was OS at 12 months from alloHCT. Univariable and multivariable analyses after best subset selection was performed. Of 5328 patients, 83% received alloHCT in a high-volume center (≥40 alloHCT/year); 90% in a university hospital; 90% in a center performing alloHCT for ≥10 years; and 73% in a Joint Accreditation Committee IHCT-Europe and EBMT (JACIE) accredited center. 52% of the patients were in CR1, and ELN risk was adverse in 37% and intermediate in 42%. On multivariable analysis, center-specific factors predicting adverse 12-month OS were program duration.

Incidences of diseases treated with transplantation frequently peak at higher age. The contribution of age to total risk of transplantation has not been estimated amidst an aging society. We compare outcomes of 1,547 patients aged 70-79 years and 9,422 patients aged 60-69 years transplanted 1998-2018 for myeloid, lymphoid and further neoplasia in Germany. To quantify the contribution of population mortality to survival, we derive excess mortality based on a sex-, year- and agematched German population in a multistate model that incorporates relapse and graft-versus-host-disease (GvHD). Overall survival, relapse-free survival (RFS) and GvHD-free-relapse-free survival (GRFS) is inferior in patients aged 70-79 years, compared to patients aged 60-69 years, with 36% (95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 34-39%) versus 43% (41-44%), 32% (30- 35%) versus 36% (35-37%) and 23% (21-26%) versus 27% (26-28%) three years post-transplant (P<0.001). Cumulative incidences of relapse at three years are 27% (25-30%) for patients aged 70-79 versus 29% (29-30%) (60-69 years) (P=0.71), yet the difference in non-relapse mortality (NRM) (40% [38-43%] vs. 35% [34-36%] in patients aged 70-79 vs. 60-69 years) (P<0.001) translates into survival differences. Median OS of patients surviving >1 year relapse-free is 6.7 (median, 95% CI: 4.5-9.4, 70-79 years) versus 9 (8.4-10.1, 60-69 years) years since landmark. Three years after RFS of one year, excess NRM is 14% (95% CI: 12-18%) in patients aged 70-79 versus 12% [11-13%] in patients aged 60-69, while population NRM is 7% (6-7%) versus 3% (3-3%). Mortality for reasons other than relapse, GvHD, or age is as high as 27% (24-29%) and 22% (22-23%) four years after transplantation. In conclusion, survival amongst older patients is adequate after allogeneic stem cell transplantation.