Search

Free tissue flap transfer can be utilized for reconstruction following tumor resection. While flap failure occurs primarily within 72 h post-operation, late failure after day 7 is rare. We present the case of a 14-year-old with a late lower extremity free flap vascular compromise, along with the successful flap salvage.

ABSTRACT: Background: Free flap reconstructions are an important reconstructive option for soft tissue defects in mangled lower extremities. Microsurgery facilitates soft tissue coverage of defects that otherwise would result in amputation. However, the success rates of traumatic lower extremity free flap reconstructions remain lower than those in other locations. Nevertheless, post-free flap failure salvage strategies have rarely been addressed. Therefore, the current review aims to provide an overview of post-free flap failure strategies in lower extremity trauma and their subsequent outcomes. Methods: A search of Pubmed, Cochrane, and Embase databases was performed on June 9, June 2021 using the following medical subject headings (MeSH) search terms: ‘lower extremity’, ‘leg injuries’, ‘reconstructive surgical procedures’, ‘reoperation’, ‘microsurgery’ and ‘treatment failure’. This review was conducted in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Partial and total free flap failures after traumatic reconstruction were included. Results: Twenty-eight studies with a total of 102 free flap failures fulfilled the eligibility criteria. Following the total failure, a second free flap is the predominant reconstructive strategy (69%). In comparison to the failure rate of a first free flap (10%), the fate of a second free flap is less favorable with a failure rate of 17%. The amputation rate following flap failure is 12%. The risk of amputation increases between primary and secondary free flap failures. After partial flap loss, the preferred strategy is a split skin graft (50%). Conclusion: To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review on the outcome of salvage strategies after free flap failure in traumatic lower extremity reconstruction. This review provides valuable evidence to take into consideration in the decision-making regarding post-free flap failure strategies.

Vasopressor use in patients undergoing autologous free tissue transfer is generally discouraged by surgeons perioperatively. This stems from concerns about the increased risk of flap failure with their use. The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the evidence and quantify any harm or benefits associated with vasopressor use. A systematic review of the literature was undertaken using OVID Medline to search 13 databases. The search strategy used Boolean operators, text word searches, truncation symbols, and adjacency searching. Terms such as "free flap," "free tissue graft," and "free tissue transfer" were used along with a list of appropriate vasopressors. The primary outcome was free flap failure, on which a meta-analysis was performed. The search initially identified 1029 unique articles, which after title and abstract screening was reduced to 112, of which 15 remained after full-text screening for inclusion in the review and analysis. We analyzed data from 8427 flaps, with 6695 having received a vasopressor. Meta-analysis demonstrated that vasopressor use reduced the relative risk (RR) of free flap failure (RR: 0.70; 95% CI: 0.50–0.97; p = 0.03) but did not affect rates of other adverse events (RR: 0.81; 95% CI: 0.63–1.05; p = 0.11). Vasopressor use appears beneficial for autologous free tissue transfer, with evidence that it reduced the risk of flap failure without impacting the rates of other adverse events. The use of vasopressors should, therefore, be encouraged on a case-by-case basis, depending upon the general physiological needs of the patient. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Lower extremity wounds associated with fractures and bony defects often require secondary orthopedic procedures after flap coverage has been performed. In this study, we compare complications between muscle and fasciocutaneous flaps after secondary orthopedic procedures. A retrospective chart review study of all lower extremity soft tissue reconstructions by a single surgeon over seven years yielded a subgroup of patients who underwent secondary orthopedic procedures, including hardware removal, hardware revision, and bone grafting after flap reconstruction. Of 355 lower extremity, soft tissue reconstructions for orthopedic coverage performed in the time period studied, 102 patients underwent secondary orthopedic procedures after flap reconstruction. Of these, 54 received muscle flaps (52.94%), and 48 received fasciocutaneous flaps (47.06%). Using this subgroup of 102 patients, we compared muscle and fasciocutaneous flaps using three categories of wound complications following these secondary procedures: There were no superficial wounds requiring local wound care only in the muscle flap group (0%, n = 0) versus 4.17% (n = 2; p = 0.130) in the fasciocutaneous flap group. There were 2 lost flaps requiring surgical debridement and additional skin grafting in the muscle flaps group (3.70%) versus 2 (4.17%; p = 0.904) in the fasciocutaneous flap group. In the third category, flap loss requiring additional soft tissue reconstruction was 18.52% (n = 10) in the muscle group versus 2.08% (n = 1; p = 0.008) in the fasciocutaneous flap group. Our data support the existing literature indicating that fasciocutaneous flaps can tolerate secondary procedures better than muscle flaps and should initially be considered in patients with higher probability of needing additional orthopedic procedures after reconstruction. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The commonest cause of microvascular free flap failure is thrombosis at the anastomosis. Pharmacological antithrombotic therapies have been used to mitigate this risk, but they carry the risk of bleeding and haematoma formation. To justify any intervention, it is necessary to evaluate the benefits and balance of risks. This meta-analysis aims to quantify the value of systemic anticoagulation during head and neck free tissue reconstruction. We performed a systematic review on the impact of additional prophylactic antithrombotic therapy on head and neck (H&N) free tissue transfer (on top and above the use of low molecular weight heparin to prevent deep vein thrombosis). We carried a PRISMA-guided literature review, following registration with PROSPERO. All studies analysing the possible impact of prophylactic anticoagulants on free flap surgery in the head and neck were eligible. The primary outcome was perioperative free flap complications (perioperative thrombosis, partial or total free flap failure, thrombo-embolic events, or re-exploration of anastomosis). Secondary outcomes included haematoma formation or bleeding complications requiring further intervention. We identified eight eligible studies out of 454. These included 3531 free flaps for H&N reconstruction. None of the assessed interventions demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in free flap outcomes. Accumulative analysis of all anti-coagulated groups demonstrated an increased relative risk of free flap complications [RR 1.54 (0.73–3.23)] compared to control albeit not statistically significant (p = 0.25). Pooled analysis from the included studies showed that the prophylactic use of therapeutic doses of anticoagulants significantly (p = 0.003) increased the risk of haematoma and bleeding requiring intervention [RR 2.98 (1.47-6.07)], without reducing the risk of free flap failure. Additional anticoagulation does not reduce the incidence of free flap thrombosis and failure. Unfractionated heparin (UFH) consistently increased the risk of free flap complications. The use of additional anticoagulation as 'prophylaxis' in the perioperative setting, increases the risk of haematoma and bleeding. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The development of modern microvascular surgical techniques has enabled the reliable transfer of free vascularized tissue. This allowed for predictable reconstruction outcomes with excellent surgical success rates. However, devastating consequences of partial or total flap failure and subsequent loss may occur. This usually occurs in the first 48–72 h post-operatively. It is rare for flaps to fail in the late post-operative period and it remains poorly understood why flaps fail after day seven. We presented two patients in whom flap failure occurred after the seventh post-operative day (POD). Complete flap failure occurred after POD 9 and 27 in our cases. During the postoperative period, there was no evidence of early occlusion or insult to the vascular integrity such as venous/arterial compression. The cause of late flap failure was due to thrombophlebitis secondary to infection from the tracheostomy-neck fistula. This assumption was supported by recurrent failure of anastomoses revision. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: There is no clear consensus on the optimal surgical strategy for providing safe coverage in salvage free flap surgery after total free flap failure. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted to evaluate patients with total failure of the primary free flap in lower extremity reconstruction between 2000 and 2017. Results: In a cohort of 1.016 patients, we identified 43 cases of total flap failure (4.2%). A total of 30 patients received a salvage free flap with a success rate of 83.3% (25/30). One patient received a secondary salvage free flap. Overall limb salvage after primary free flap loss was 83.7% (36/43). Conclusions: Microsurgical management of free flap loss in the lower extremity is challenging and requires a decisive re-evaluation of risk factors and alternative strategies. This should include reconsidering the flap choice with a tendency towards traditional and safe workhorse flaps, a low-threshold switch to different recipient vessels, including arteriovenous (AV) loops, bypasses (especially in case of venous insufficiency) and back-up procedures, such as negative pressure wound therapy or dermal regeneration templates with skin grafting in cases of lower demand and critically ill patients. We derived one suggestion from our previous practice: replacing perforator flaps with axial pattern flaps ("safe workhorses"). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Flow couplers for venous anastomosis, which enable the invasive monitoring of free flaps during the postoperative period with a continuous venous signal audible immediately after completion of the anastomosis, have been reported to be reliable, sensitive, and specific as anastomotic flap monitoring adjuncts. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the reliability, sensitivity, specificity, and outcomes of surgical exploration, and the impact on free-flap survival of the venous anastomotic flow coupler for microvascular head and neck reconstruction in a consecutive series of patients. This is a retrospective review of consecutive patients treated in the department of oral and maxillofacial surgery who underwent reconstruction of a head and neck defect using venous anastomosis with a flow coupler-vascularised free flap between October 2015 and December 2020. A total of 189 patients had free-flap reconstruction of head and neck defects. We compared the venous flow coupler group (n = 72) with patients who had free flaps with hand-sewn anastomoses over the same period (n = 117). There were no false positive/negatives associated with the flow coupler as an implantable flap monitor. The flow coupler cohort had a significantly higher flap salvage rate compared with free flaps that were monitored clinically (p = 0.04). The venous flow coupler has been shown to be a reliable microvascular anastomotic and invasive flap monitor that enables accurate and timely detection of flap compromise and prompt, successful free-flap salvage. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: Surgical site infection (SSI) frequently occurs in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) after tumor resection and can lead to death in severe cases. Moreover, there is no definitive conclusion about the risk factors of SSI. Therefore, it is of great clinical significance to study the factors affecting the SSI. Methods: The HNC patients included in this study were all from the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery of the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University (CSU), and these patients received surgical treatment in the department from January 2018 to December 2019. The cross tabulation with chi-squared testing and multivariate regression analysis were applied to determine the risk factors of SSI. To identify the key risk factors of SSI, the caret package was used to construct three different machine learning models to investigate important features involving 26 SSI-related risk factors. Results: Participants were 632 HNC patients who underwent surgery in our department from January 2018 to December 2019. During the postoperative period, 82 patients suffered from SSI, and surgical site infection rate (SSIR) was about 12.97%. Multivariate logistic regression analysis shows that diabetes mellitus, primary tumor site (floor of mouth), preoperative radiotherapy, flap failure, and neck dissection (bilateral) are risk factors for SSI of HNC. Machine learning indicated that diabetes mellitus, primary tumor site (floor of mouth), and flap failure were consistently ranked the top three in the 26 SSI-related risk factors. Conclusion: Diabetes mellitus, primary tumor site (floor of mouth), flap failure, preoperative radiotherapy, and neck dissection (bilateral) are risk factors for SSI of HNC. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Investigate current practice patterns of head and neck microvascular reconstructive surgeons when removing an implantable Doppler after free flap surgery. Study Design: Cross‐sectional survey study. Methods: Survey distributed to head and neck microvascular reconstructive surgeons. Data regarding years performing free tissue transfer, case numbers, management of implantable Doppler wire, and complications were collected. Results: Eighty‐five responses were analyzed (38,000 cases). Sixty‐six responders (77.6%) use an implantable Doppler for postoperative monitoring, with 97% using the Cook‐Swartz Doppler Flow Monitoring System. Among this group, 65.2% pull the wire after monitoring was complete, 3% cut the wire, and 31.8% have both cut and pulled the wire. Of those who have cut and pulled the wire, 48% report cutting and pulling the wire with equal frequency, 43% formerly pulled the wire and now cut the wire, and 9% previously cut the wire but now pull the wire. Of those who pull the wire, there were two injuries to the pedicle requiring return to the operating for flap salvage, and one acute venous congestion. Of the nine who previously pulled the wire, six (67%) cited concerns with major bleeding/flap compromise as the reason for cutting the wire. Conclusion: In this study, most surgeons use an implantable Doppler for monitoring of free flaps postoperatively. In extremely rare instances, pulling the implantable Doppler wire has resulted in flap compromise necessitating revision of the vascular anastomosis. Cutting the wire and leaving the proximal portion in the surgical site has been adopted as a management option. Level of Evidence: 4 Laryngoscope, 132:554–559, 2022 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Virtual surgical planning (VSP) for jaw reconstruction with free fibula flap (FFF) became a routine procedure and requires computed tomography angiography (CTA) for preoperative evaluation of the lower limbs vascular system and the bone. The aim of the study was to assess whether the distribution and density of periosteal branches (PB) and septo-cutaneous perforators (SCP) of the fibular artery have an impact on flap success. Method: This retrospective clinical study assessed preoperative CTA of the infra-popliteal vasculature and the small vessel system of 72 patients who underwent FFF surgery. Surgical outcome of flap transfer includes wound healing, subtotal, and total flap loss were matched with the segmental vascular supply. Result: A total of 72 patients (28 females, 38.9 %; 44 males, 61.1 %) fulfilled the study inclusion criteria. The mean age was 58.5 (± 15.3 years). Stenoses of the lower limbs' vessel (n = 14) were mostly detected in the fibular artery (n = 11). Flap success was recorded in n = 59 (82.0%), partial flap failure in n = 4 (5.5%) and total flap loss in n = 9 (12.5%). The study found a mean number (± SD) of 2.53 ± 1.60 PBs and 1.39 ± 1.03 SCPs of the FA at the donor-site. The proximal FFF segment of poly-segmental jaw reconstruction showed a higher rate of PB per flap segment than in the distal segments. Based on the total number of prepared segments (n = 121), 46.7% (n = 7) of mono-, 40.4% (n = 21) of bi-, and 31.5 % (n = 17) of tri-segmental fibula flaps were at least supplied by one PB in the success group. Overall, this corresponds to 37.2% (45 out of 121) of all successful FFF. For total flap loss (n = 14), a relative number of 42.9% (n = 6) of distinct supplied segments was recorded. Wound healing disorder of the donor site was not statistically significant influenced by the detected rate of SCP. Conclusion: In general, a correlation between higher rates of PB and SCP and the flap success could not be statistically proved by the study sample. We conclude, that preoperative PB and SCP mapping based on routine CTA imaging is not suitable for prediction of flap outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background  The role of vasopressors has long been a subject of debate in microsurgery. Conventional wisdom dictates the avoidance of vasopressor use, due to concerns such as peripheral vasoconstriction, inducing vasospasm of the anastomoses, and leading to failure in perfusion. It has since become common practice in some centers to avoid intraoperative vasopressor use during free tissue transfer surgery. Recent studies have suggested that this traditional view may not be supported by clinical evidence. However, none of these studies have separated vasopressor use by method of administration. Methods  We conducted a retrospective review of our experience of vasopressor use in free flap surgery at a single high-volume center. The outcome measures were flap failure, flap-related complications and overall postoperative complications (reported using the Clavien–Dindo classification). Groups were compared using Chi-square or Fisher's Exact test where appropriate. Results  A total of 777 cases in 717 patients were identified. 59.1% of these had vasopressors administered intraoperatively. The overall failure rate was 2.2%, with 9.8% experienced flap-related complications. There was no difference in flap loss when vasopressors were administered, but an increased rate of microvascular thrombosis was noted (p  = 0.003). Continuous administration of vasopressors was associated with reduced venous congestion, whereas intermittent boluses increased risk of microvascular thrombosis. Conclusion  Our study confirms previous findings that intraoperative vasopressor use in free flap surgery is not associated with increased failure rate. Administering vasopressors continuously may be safer than via repeated boluses. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BackgroundVirtual surgical planning (VSP) for jaw reconstruction with free fibula flap (FFF) became a routine procedure and requires computed tomography angiography (CTA) for preoperative evaluation of the lower limbs vascular system and the bone. The aim of the study was to assess whether the distribution and density of periosteal branches (PB) and septo-cutaneous perforators (SCP) of the fibular artery have an impact on flap success.MethodThis retrospective clinical study assessed preoperative CTA of the infra-popliteal vasculature and the small vessel system of 72 patients who underwent FFF surgery. Surgical outcome of flap transfer includes wound healing, subtotal, and total flap loss were matched with the segmental vascular supply.ResultA total of 72 patients (28 females, 38.9 %; 44 males, 61.1 %) fulfilled the study inclusion criteria. The mean age was 58.5 (± 15.3 years). Stenoses of the lower limbs’ vessel (n = 14) were mostly detected in the fibular artery (n = 11). Flap success was recorded in n = 59 (82.0%), partial flap failure in n = 4 (5.5%) and total flap loss in n = 9 (12.5%). The study found a mean number (± SD) of 2.53 ± 1.60 PBs and 1.39 ± 1.03 SCPs of the FA at the donor-site. The proximal FFF segment of poly-segmental jaw reconstruction showed a higher rate of PB per flap segment than in the distal segments. Based on the total number of prepared segments (n = 121), 46.7% (n = 7) of mono-, 40.4% (n = 21) of bi-, and 31.5 % (n = 17) of tri-segmental fibula flaps were at least supplied by one PB in the success group. Overall, this corresponds to 37.2% (45 out of 121) of all successful FFF. For total flap loss (n = 14), a relative number of 42.9% (n = 6) of distinct supplied segments was recorded. Wound healing disorder of the donor site was not statistically significant influenced by the detected rate of SCP.ConclusionIn general, a correlation between higher rates of PB and SCP and the flap success could not be statistically proved by the study sample. We conclude, that preoperative PB and SCP mapping based on routine CTA imaging is not suitable for prediction of flap outcome.

Background: There is no clear consensus on the optimal surgical strategy for providing safe coverage in salvage free flap surgery after total free flap failure. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted to evaluate patients with total failure of the primary free flap in lower extremity reconstruction between 2000 and 2017. Results: In a cohort of 1.016 patients, we identified 43 cases of total flap failure (4.2%). A total of 30 patients received a salvage free flap with a success rate of 83.3% (25/30). One patient received a secondary salvage free flap. Overall limb salvage after primary free flap loss was 83.7% (36/43). Conclusions: Microsurgical management of free flap loss in the lower extremity is challenging and requires a decisive re-evaluation of risk factors and alternative strategies. This should include reconsidering the flap choice with a tendency towards traditional and safe workhorse flaps, a low-threshold switch to different recipient vessels, including arteriovenous (AV) loops, bypasses (especially in case of venous insufficiency) and back-up procedures, such as negative pressure wound therapy or dermal regeneration templates with skin grafting in cases of lower demand and critically ill patients. We derived one suggestion from our previous practice: replacing perforator flaps with axial pattern flaps (“safe workhorses”).

Purpose: Free flap reconstruction is a valuable technique to preserve function in oncological head and neck surgery. Postoperative graft thrombosis is a dreaded risk. This study aims to compare low-dose unfractionated heparin (UFH) and low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) in perioperative thrombosis prophylaxis. Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of 266 free flaps performed at our academic center. A comparison was made between 2 patient groups, based on their respective postoperative prophylaxis protocols either with UFH (n = 87) or LMWH (n = 179). Primary endpoints were the frequency of transplant thrombosis and the number of flap failures. Secondary endpoints were the occurrence of peri- and postoperative complications. Results: The flap survival rate was 96.6% and 93.3% for the groups UFH and LMWH, respectively (P = 0.280). The rate of postoperative bleeding requiring revision was 4.6% and 6.7% for each group, respectively (P = 0.498). We found a hematoma formation in 4.6% and 3.9% (P = 0.792). Conclusion: The free-flap survival rate using low-dose UFH seems to be equivalent to LMWH regimens without compromising the postoperative outcome. Consequently, for risk-adapted thrombosis prophylaxis, either LMWH or UFH can be administrated. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Even though the benefit of free tissue transfer is uncontested in complex reconstructive cases, vascular compromise and/or flap failure remain a challenge for the surgeon and identification of possible risk factors can aid in the preoperative planning. The aim of this study was to identify the individual risk factors leading to flap failure and/or vascular compromise in free tissue transfers in a single institution over a period of 10 years and to create an index predicting these problems, as well as finding predictors of other postoperative complications. Data from all the patients undergoing free tissue transfers between 2009 and 2018 were retrospectively analyzed (demographics, comorbidities, flap failure, vascular compromise, and other complications). The results from the univariate and multivariate analyses were used to create an index. A predictability index with three classes (low, moderate, and high risk) was calculated for each patient, based on defect etiology and the presence of coronary heart disease, diabetes, smoking, peripheral arterial vascular disease, and arterial hypertension. A patient with moderate-risk index had 9.3 times higher chances of developing vascular compromise than those in the low-risk group, while a high-risk index had 18.6 higher odds (p =0.001). American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification was found to be a predictor of complications in free tissue transfer (p =0.001). If patients at a high risk of vascular compromise could be identified preoperatively through this predictability index, patient counseling could be improved and the surgeon might adapt the reconstructive plan and choose an alternative reconstructive strategy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rapid identification of possible vascular compromise in free flap reconstruction to minimize time to reoperation improves achieving free flap salvage. Subjective clinical assessment, often complemented with handheld Doppler, is the golden standard for flap monitoring; but this lacks consistency and may be variable. Non-invasive optical methods such as near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) and hyperspectral imaging (HSI) could facilitate objective flap monitoring. A systematic review was conducted to compare NIRS with HSI in detecting vascular compromise in reconstructive flap surgery as compared to standard monitoring. A literature search was performed using PubMed and Embase scientific database in August 2021. Studies were selected by two independent reviewers. Sixteen NIRS and five HSI studies were included. In total, 3662 flap procedures were carried out in 1970 patients using NIRS. Simultaneously; 90 flaps were performed in 90 patients using HSI. HSI and NIRS flap survival were 92.5% (95% CI: 83.3–96.8) and 99.2% (95% CI: 97.8–99.7). Statistically significant differences were observed in flap survival (p = 0.02); flaps returned to OR (p = 0.04); salvage rate (p < 0.01) and partial flap loss rate (p < 0.01). However, no statistically significant difference was observed concerning flaps with vascular crisis (p = 0.39). NIRS and HSI have proven to be reliable; accurate and user-friendly monitoring methods. However, based on the currently available literature, no firm conclusions can be drawn concerning non-invasive monitoring technique superiority

Background: Studies carried out in 1998 by Khouri et al. established a benchmark for free flap survival. Whilst individual factors related to free flap survival have been examined since, there has been little contemporaneous data re-examining overall flap survival rates and factors related to complications to assess progress in the field and specifically European or UK practice. Methods: Six plastic surgery units from four regions within the South West UK regional collaboration group prospectively collected data on all free flap surgery performed in a 6-month period between October 2013 and April 2014. Results: Data on 264 free flaps were prospectively collected. Total flap failure was 2.7% and partial flap failure was 4.5%. Regression analysis identified obesity and previous recipient site radiotherapy as the most important factors in flap failure. The rate of intra-operative and post-operative flap thrombosis was 3.8% and 6.4%, respectively, and was associated with lower limb recipient site and surgeon grade. Post-operative haematoma occurred in 4.2%, associated with recipient site radiotherapy. Conclusions: Our study establishes a UK baseline for standards in free flap surgery. With the recent introduction of a UK Free Flap Surgery Registry, this baseline will support unit audit and improvements in free flap surgery. Level of evidence: Level III, risk/prognostic study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

• Pedicled flap reconstruction in the head and neck is still an alternative if free flaps are not possible. • Angiography of the subclavian artery is not a standard procedure in the surgical planning of pedicle flap harvesting. • In exceptional cases, we recommend angiography of the neck and thoracic vessels. • The application of a temporary pharyngostoma is still an option in extraordinary circumstances. Pedicled flap reconstruction still plays an essential role in head and neck surgery as an alternative to free grafts. Two standard methods are the pectoralis major and the deltopectoral flap, which are generally characterized by their reliable perfusion. This case describes bilateral arteriosclerosis of the subclavian artery as a possible cause of flap failure. We report on a 65-year-old patient with a multilevel carcinoma of the right pharynx. Due to the unique patient history, a free flap reconstruction was not possible. After resection of the primary, we performed reconstruction with a pedicled pectoralis major flap. Postoperatively, we observed necrosis of the pectoralis major flap. Secondary defect reconstructions were performed with a deltopectoral flap first from the right and then, in the case of necrosis, from the left side. Stenosing arteriosclerotic plaques of the subclavian artery on both sides were the cause of flap failure. Preoperative angiography of the subclavian artery is not a standard diagnostic procedure in the surgical planning of pedicled flap reconstruction in the head and neck region. In exceptional cases, we recommend angiographic imaging of the supplying vessels to make a more precise flap selection and avoid complications. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Surgeons have preferential ways of performing venous anastomosis in head and neck microsurgery. However, controversies exist regarding the superiority of each method. This study aims to determine the effects of these variables on the rates of thrombosis and flap failure, and propose an algorithm to be used as a facilitator in the decision-making process. A total of 208 microsurgical reconstructions on 199 patients from a single surgeon's data were evaluated. Selection of recipient vein (superficial vs. deep), style of anastomosis (end-to-end vs. end-to-side), number of outflows (one vs. two) and technique of anastomosis (hand-sewn vs. coupler) were compared. Selection was done according to the pre- and intraoperative plan, as well as, surgeon's clinical judgement. Outcomes were determined as rates of venous thrombosis and flap failure. Five patients (2.4%) had venous problems, leading to two partial and three total flap failures. Selection of the recipient vein, style and number of outflows did not affect the outcomes, whereas coupler use decreased the rates of venous thrombosis and flap failure (p=0.008). Although it is difficult to set dogmatic criteria to achieve consistent outcomes, coupler use in this study prevented flap failure. An algorithmic approach was proposed with the results of the data and literature to increase the success in microsurgical anastomosis. Surgeons should use algorithms and sound judgement with adherence to microsurgical principles to obtain the best results for each patient. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Microvascular free tissue transfer is a reliable method for reconstructive surgery. However, pedicle thrombosis remains a serious complication following free tissue transfer as no consensus has been reached on the optimal management of failing flaps. The purpose of this systematic review is to examine the current evidence on the use of thrombolytic drugs and their effects on microvascular flap salvage rates. A systematic literature search was performed using Medline, Embase, and, PubMed databases to identify scientific literature published between January 1987 and January 2019. This systematic review was performed in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Articles of English language studies reporting on free flap salvage procedures or protocols using thrombolytic drugs were included and reviewed by one author. Of 105 articles screened, 27 studies and case reports were included and qualified for data extraction. Overall, the level of evidence of the current literature is low. Thirteen retrospective studies tried to demonstrate a systemic approach for thrombolysis in flap salvage. The other 14 case reports presented clinical use of thrombolytic drugs to salvage free flaps. None of the thrombolytic agents presented had superior salvage outcomes. A review on the current literature did not provide satisfactory and consistent evidence for the optimal management of patients with microvascular thrombosis, since no consensus has been reached on the optimal management of failing flaps. Prospective randomized studies are needed regarding their indications, dosages, and methods of administration, efficacy, and safety. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background A 67-year-old man presented with abrupt failure of a pedicled vertical rectus abdominus myocutaneous (VRAM) flap 13 days postoperatively. Methods The patient underwent pelvic reconstruction with a pedicled VRAM flap following sacral chordoma and abdominoperineal resection. The flap remained well perfused and viable until postoperative day 13, at which point the patient was noted to become systemically unwell with fever, chills, and abdominal pain. This clinically coincided with prompt arterial and venous insufficiency of the VRAM flap. Results Computed tomography of the abdomen was ordered to rule out a pelvic collection and revealed an inflated Foley catheter in the bulbar urethra. This was associated with marked distention of the bladder and bilateral hydronephrosis. Direct compression of the deep inferior epigastric pedicle by the bladder neck was noted. Conclusion The case highlights the importance of considering bladder outlet obstruction and subsequent distention as a cause of pedicle compression and VRAM flap failure following pelvic reconstruction.

The reporting of the outcomes of flap reconstruction is often based on numerical success rates. Whilst this remains a useful variable with which to measure success, it is limited in its ability to reflect the complex processes involved. The lack of consistency in the categorisation of outcomes of flap reconstruction in the head and neck could potentially lead us to lose the opportunity to fully capture the implications of its success or failure, or both. We propose a classification that moves away from primarily reporting the results of its binary nature, and focuses more on the process of reconstruction, particularly in the head and neck. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: To examine the effects of vasopressors on free flap outcomes. Background: Most micro-surgeons avoid the use of vasopressors during free flap surgery due to concerns of vasoconstriction, which could potentially lead to vascular thrombosis and flap failure. Previous studies lack the statistical power to draw meaningful conclusions. Methods: All free flaps between 2004 and 2014 from a single institution were reviewed retrospectively. Vasopressors were given intraoperatively as an intravenous bolus when blood pressure dropped >20% from baseline. The timing of intraoperative vasopressor administration was divided into 3 phases: from anesthesia induction to 30 minutes before the start of flap ischemia (P1); end of P1 to 30 minutes after revascularization (P2); end of P2 to end of surgery (P3). Agents included phenylephrine, ephedrine and calcium chloride. Results: A total of 5671 free flap cases in 4888 patients undergoing head and neck, breast, trunk, or extremity reconstruction were identified. Vasopressors were used intraoperatively in 85% of cases. The overall incidence of pedicle compromise was 3.6%, with a flap loss rate of 1.7%. A propensity score matching analysis showed that intraoperative use of any agents at any time of surgery was not associated with increased overall pedicle compromise [51/ 1584 (3.2%) vs 37/792 (4.7%); P = 0.074] or flap failure rates [26/1584 (1.6%) vs 19/792 (2.4%); P = 0.209]. Rather, there was less risk of venous congestion [33/1584 (2.1%) vs 31/792 (3.9%); P = 0.010]. Conclusions: Intraoperative use of phenylephrine, ephedrine, or calcium chloride as an intravenous bolus does not increase flap compromise and failure rates in cancer patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The lack of uniformity of criteria for defining recipient-site infection after oral oncologic surgery with simultaneous reconstruction is problematic despite numerous studies on this issue. This study aimed to investigate the difference in the criteria for defining recipient-site infection after oral oncologic surgery with reconstruction.Methods: A Medline search was performed via PUBMED using the following combinations of key terms that were tagged in the title, abstract, or both: "surgical site infection-head neck," "surgical site infection-oral cancer," "antibiotic prophylaxis-head neck," and "surgical site infection-oral carcinoma." Search results were filtered between 2005 and 2017. Articles in which there was no mention of the criteria for definition of surgical-site infection were excluded.Results: The number of articles that met the inclusion criteria was 24. The lack of uniformity in the criteria for defining recipient-site infection in each article appeared to be attributable mainly to differences in whether an orocutaneous fistula and superficial incisional infection were regarded as recipient-site infection.Conclusion: Reconsideration of the categorization of orocutaneous fistula as infection, regardless of the etiology, and differentiation of superficial and deep incisional infections are necessary for correct assessment of recipient-site infection in oral oncologic surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary Autologous microsurgical flap reconstruction has become commonplace in most plastic surgery units, and the success rates of this procedure have markedly increased over recent years. However, the possibility of flap failure still needs to be considered. A review of the literature reveals that the critical period for flap-threatening complications is the first 24–48 post-operative hours; however, the window for the onset of these complications remains open for up to 7 days post-operatively. In this study, we focus on the timing of flap complications, aiming to elucidate the time period over which meticulous flap monitoring can positively contribute to flap salvage rates. The relevant literature on the study topic was collated and reviewed in conjunction with the senior author's case series, which consisted of a total of 335 free flaps used during a 2-year period for breast and head and neck reconstruction or limb trauma. Patients' series were then divided into groups according to the complications timing. The correlation between the timing of complications and the flap salvage rate was investigated among the groups. Overall analysis of both the literature and our own data on 335 free flaps showed a progressive reduction in flap salvage rate during post-operative days; the correlations between the times of complication onset and the flap salvage rates in all groups were significant up to the third post-operative day. The correlations between salvage rates and later complications were not significant. Our results suggest that hourly flap monitoring should be compulsory during the first 48 post-operative hours, but clinical monitoring four times daily should be sufficient thereafter. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]