Search

Dedifferentiated and Well-differentiated liposarcoma are characterized by a systematic amplification of the Murine Double Minute 2 (MDM2) oncogene. We demonstrate that p53-independent metabolic functions of chromatin-bound MDM2 are exacerbated in liposarcoma and mediate an addiction to serine metabolism to sustain tumor growth. However, the origin of exogenous serine remains unclear. Here, we show that elevated serine levels in mice harboring liposarcoma-patient derived xenograft, released by distant muscle is essential for liposarcoma cell survival. Repressing interleukine-6 expression, or treating liposarcoma cells with Food and Drugs Administration (FDA) approved anti-interleukine-6 monoclonal antibody, decreases de novo serine synthesis in muscle, impairs proliferation, and increases cell death in vitro and in vivo. This work reveals a metabolic crosstalk between muscle and liposarcoma tumor and identifies anti-interleukine-6 as a plausible treatment for liposarcoma patients. During tumorigenesis, liposarcoma has been reported to develop a dependence on serine metabolism but it is unclear how this high energetic demand is met. Here, the authors identify a crosstalk mechanism between tumor and distant muscle cells wherein liposarcoma cell-derived IL-6 drives muscle cell release of serine, in turn accelerating tumor growth. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: CIC‐rearranged sarcomas (CIC‐RS) represent the most frequent subset of "Ewing‐like" undifferentiated small round cell sarcomas. These tumors tend to be more aggressive than Ewing sarcomas. Moreover, treatment strategy can differ according to teams. The primary aim of this retrospective study was to describe the characteristics, treatments, and outcome for patients with CIC‐RS included in the French NETSARC+ database. Methods: Pediatric and adult patients from 13 French centers with a diagnosis of CIC‐RS were registered from October 2008 to March 2021. Patients and tumors characteristics were collected from the national network NETSARC+ database (http://netsarc.sarcomabcb.org). CIC‐RS diagnosis was pathologically and molecularly confirmed with a central review by expert pathologists. Two groups of patients were studied: those treated as classical Ewing sarcomas (cohort EwS) and those treated as high‐grade soft tissue sarcomas (cohort STS) according to ESMO and/or EpSSG guidelines. Survival was calculated using the Kaplan–Meier method and the log‐rank test was used to compare survival. Results: Among 79 patients, the male/female sex ratio was 0.7 and the median age at diagnosis was 27 years (range 2–87). With a median follow‐up of 37 months, 39 patients died of the disease. Median overall survival from diagnosis was 18 months, with no significant difference between both cohorts (p = 0.9). Nevertheless, when focusing on patients with metastatic disease at diagnosis (N = 21), all patients from cohort STS died of disease while some patients from cohort EwS were still alive and in complete remission. Conclusion: FSG experience confirms the aggressive clinical course of CDS patients regardless of chemotherapy regimen. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A combination of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is likely to be a therapeutic option for numerous oncological situations due to high frequency of oncogenic addiction and progress in precision oncology. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents a subtype of tumors for which oncogenic drivers are frequently involved. To the best of our knowledge, we report the first case of a patient treated with three different TKIs. Osimertinib and crizotinib were administered concurrently for an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated NSCLC developing a MET amplification as a resistance mechanism to osimertinib. Simultaneously, imatinib was administered for a metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor. The progression-free survival was 7 months for both tumors with this tritherapy. The use of therapeutic drug monitoring to assess plasma concentrations of each TKI was a powerful tool to manage the toxicity profile of this combination (creatine phosphokinase elevation) while preserving an optimal exposure to each TKI and treatment efficacy. We observed an imatinib over-exposition related to crizotinib introduction, probably explained by drug–drug interaction mediated by crizotinib enzymatic inhibition on cytochrome P-450 3A4. Posology adjustment due to therapeutic drug monitoring was probably involved in the good survival outcome of the patient. This tool should be used more routinely for patients treated by TKIs to prevent co-treatment interactions and, in particular, for patients receiving TKI combinations to obtain optimal therapeutic exposure and efficacy while reducing possible side-effects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The benefit of chemotherapy (CT) in rare bone sarcomas is not documented in prospective studies. Our retrospective study from the French sarcoma network for bone tumors ResOs was performed in adult patients (pts) from 1976 to 2014, with histologically verified diagnosis of leiomyosarcomas (LMS), undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS) or radiation‐associated sarcomas of bone. The median follow‐up was 4.7 years (95% CI: 3.7‐6.5). Clinical features, treatment modalities and outcomes were recorded and analyzed from 145 pts (median age 53 years [range 20‐87]). Site of disease was extremities (66%) or axial skeleton (34%), 111 (77%) presented with localized and potentially resectable disease. The most common histological subtypes were UPS (58%) and LMS (33%); 58% were high‐grade tumors. Surgery was performed in 127 pts. In the 111 localized pts, 28 pts (25%) underwent upfront surgery or exclusive radiotherapy (RT; >50 Gy) without CT, whereas 83 pts (75%) received either neoadjuvant (n = 26) or adjuvant CT (n = 13) or both (n = 44). Neoadjuvant and adjuvant CT was mostly doxorubicin‐based (95%/86%) and cisplatin‐based (67%/63%). R0 resection was achieved in 59 pts, and a good histological response in 15 patients (25%). Adjuvant RT was performed in 24 (22%) pts. For the whole cohort (n = 145), the 5‐year overall survival (OS) rate was 53% [42; 62]. In univariate analysis, age ≤ 60 was associated with a longer disease‐free survival (DFS) (P =.0436). Neoadjuvant and adjuvant CT tended to be associated with better DFS (P =.056) with no significant impact on OS in this retrospective series. What's new? Rarer types of primary bone sarcoma (non‐osteosarcoma, non‐chondrosarcoma, and non‐Ewing sarcoma) present a major diagnostic challenge, and are often excluded from clinical trials. In this study, the authors found that patients who had localized disease and were treated with both neo‐adjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy tended to have better disease‐free survival (DFS). However, there was no significant impact on overall survival (OS). The role of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiation therapy remains unclear, which highlights the need for prospective randomised trials in these uncommon bone malignancies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Treatment options for metastatic osteosarcomas are scarce. Following failure of standard first line therapy, patients who relapse present a challenging treatment dilemma, and have a poor prognosis. Surgical removal of all metastases is essential. A retrospective analysis of patients with metastatic osteosarcomas was conducted in 15 French Sarcoma Group centers. From January 2009 to December 2018, we identified 120 adult patients; 36 with synchronous and 84 with metachronous metastases with 74 males and 46 females. Mean age was 30 years (18‐53). Metastatic sites were lung, bone and other in 91, 11 and 24 patients, respectively. Mean time to first metachronous metastases was 22 months (4‐97). All patients except 13 (10.8%) with metachronous metastases received a first line systemic treatment for relapse, and 39 patients (32.5%) were included in a clinical trial. Eighty‐one patients (67.5%) had local treatment of distant metastases. Median progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 5.5 (95% CI 4.6‐6.4) and 20.5 months (95% CI 13.2‐27.7) respectively for the overall group. In multivariate analysis, more than five metastases, time to first metastases <24 months, were statistically significant negative prognostic factors for OS and PFS (P =.002, ≤.001 and P =.006, ≤.001, respectively). Surgery of metastases was associated with better prognosis on OS and PFS (P =.001 and.037, respectively). The presence of bone metastases was a negative prognostic factor on OS but not on PFS (P =.021). In reference sarcoma centers, relapsed osteosarcoma patients with more than one metastasis commonly receive more than one line of systemic therapy, and are included in clinical trial if available. What's new? About a third of osteosarcoma patients will develop metastases, usually with a poor prognosis. In this French study of adult osteosarcoma patients, the authors compared different treatment modalities, both systemic and localized. They also sought to define prognostic factors, both for patients who developed metastases after their initial treatment, and also for those with metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis. They found no significant difference in overall survival between these two groups. They also conclude that radical focal treatment of metastases is the only modality that allows long‐lasting survival. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: The optimal threshold of surgical margins for breast malignant phyllodes tumors (MPTs) and the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy were investigated. Patients and Methods: We conducted a multicenter nationwide retrospective study of all MPT cases with central pathological review within the French Sarcoma Group. Endpoints were local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS), and overall survival (OS) rates. Results: Overall, 212 patients were included in the study. All non-metastatic patients underwent primary surgical treatment, including 58.6% of conservative surgeries. An R0 resection was achieved in 117 patients (59.4%: 26.9% of patients with 1–2 mm margins, 12.2% of patients with 3–7 mm margins, 20.3% of patients with ≥ 8 mm margins). Ninety-four patients (45%) underwent a second surgery (SS) to obtain R0 margins, with a final mastectomy rate of 72.6%. Radiotherapy and chemotherapy were performed in 91 (43.1%) and 23 patients (10.9%), respectively, but were not associated with better outcomes. Mastectomy was significantly associated with better LRFS (p < 0.001). Margins of 0, 1, or 2 mm with SS were associated with better MFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.3, p = 0.005) and OS (HR 0.32, p = 0.005) compared with margins of 0–1–2 mm without SS. Wider margins (> 8 mm) were not superior to margins of 3–7 mm (3–7 mm vs. > 8 mm; HR 0.81, p = 0.69). Age (HR 2.14, p = 0.038) and tumor necrosis (HR 1.96, p = 0.047) were found to be poor prognostic factors and were associated with MFS. Conclusions: This study suggests that 3 mm margins are necessary and sufficient for surgical management of MPTs, and emphasizes the importance of SS to obtain clear margins in case of 0–1–2 mm margins. No impact of adjuvant chemotherapy or radiotherapy was detected in this study. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Metastatic phyllodes tumors have poor prognosis with median overall survival of 11.5 months. The objective of this study is to identify prognostic factors and the best options for management of metastatic malignant phyllode tumors (MMPTs). Patients and Methods: A multicentric retrospective study, including cases of MMPT from 10 sarcoma centers, was conducted. The primary end-point was overall survival (OS), and the secondary end-point was the clinical benefit of chemotherapy (CBCT) rate. Results: 51 MMPT patients were included. Median time from diagnosis to metastatic recurrence was 13 months. Management of MMPT consisted in surgery of the metastatic disease for 16 patients (31.3%), radiation therapy of the metastatic disease for 15 patients (31.9%), and chemotherapy for 37 patients (72.5%). Median follow-up was 62.1 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 31–80 months]. Median OS was 11.5 months (95% CI 7.5–18.7 months). On multivariate analysis, two or more metastatic sites [hazard ratio (HR) 2.81, 95% CI 1.27–6.19; p = 0.01] and surgery of metastasis (HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.14–0.78; p = 0.01) were independently associated with OS. The CBCT rate was 31.4% and 16.7% for the first and second lines. Polychemotherapy was not superior to single-agent therapy. Alkylating-agent-based chemotherapy, possibly associated with anthracyclines, was associated with a better CBCT rate than anthracyclines alone (p = 0.049). Conclusions: The results of this study emphasize the impact of the number of metastatic sites on survival of MMPT patients and the leading role of metastasis surgery in MMPT management. If systemic therapy is used, it should include alkylating agents, which are associated with a better clinical benefit. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]