Search

Polycystic kidney disease (PKD) is a condition typified by multiple renal cysts and renal enlargement. Classification is usually determined by mode of inheritance—autosomal dominant PKD (ADPKD) or autosomal recessive PKD (ARPKD). ARPKD frequently presents in fetal life, but here we report a rare case of a family with two siblings diagnosed with ADPKD manifesting in utero with novel genetic findings. During the first pregnancy, enlarged cystic kidneys were noted at the gestational age (GA) of 18 weeks, which became progressively larger and anyhdramnios ensued by GA of 25 weeks. The couple opted to terminate the pregnancy. The second pregnancy similarly presented with bilateral enlarged cystic kidneys, but amniotic fluid remained normal throughout and she delivered at GA of 36 weeks. Genetic testing revealed the fetus to be heterozygous in AD PKD1, which is known to cause ADPKD and heterozygous for a hypomorphic allele for ADPKD of uncertain significance. The fetus was also found to be heterozygous in the AR PKHD1 gene with a variant not previously described in the literature. Where fetal features consistent with ARPKD are identified in the setting of familial ADPKD, this fetal manifestation of ADPKD, resulting from combined variants in the PKD1 gene, should be considered.

In the prospective multicenter Genesis study, we developed a prediction model for Cesarean delivery (CD) in term nulliparous women. The objective of this secondary analysis was to determine whether the Genesis model has the potential to predict maternal and neonatal morbidity associated with vaginal delivery.The national prospective Genesis trial recruited 2,336 nulliparous women with a vertex presentation between 39 + 0- and 40 + 6-weeks' gestation from seven tertiary centers. The prediction model used five parameters to assess the risk of CD: maternal age, maternal height, body mass index, fetal head circumference and fetal abdominal circumference. Simple and multiple logistic regression analyses were used to develop the Genesis model. The risk score calculated using this model were correlated with maternal and neonatal morbidity in women who delivered vaginally: postpartum hemorrhage (PPH), obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI), shoulder dystocia, one- and five-minute Apgar score ≤ 7, neonatal intensive care (NICU) admission, cephalohematoma, fetal laceration, nerve palsy and fractures. The morbidities associated with spontaneous vaginal delivery were compared with those associated with operative vaginal delivery (OVD). The likelihood ratios for composite morbidity and the morbidity associated with OVD based on the Genesis risk scores were also calculated.A total of 1,845 (79%) nulliparous women had a vaginal delivery. A trend of increasing intervention and morbidity was observed with increasing Genesis risk score, including OVD (p 0.001), PPH (p 0.008), NICU admission (p 0.001), low Apgar score at one-minute (p 0.001) and OASI (p = 0.009). The morbidity associated with OVD was significantly higher compared to spontaneous vaginal delivery, including NICU admission (p 0.001), PPH (p = 0.022), birth injury (p 0.001), shoulder dystocia (p = 0.002) and Apgar score of7 at one-minute (p 0.001). The positive likelihood ratios for composite outcomes (where the OVD was excluded) increases with increasing risk score from 1.005 at risk score of 5% to 2.507 for risk score of50%.In women who ultimately achieved a vaginal birth, we have shown more maternal and neonatal morbidity in the setting of a Genesis nomogram-determined high-risk score for intrapartum CD. Therefore, the Genesis prediction tool also has the potential to predict a more morbid vaginal delivery.

Purpose Despite the rise of non-invasive screening tests for fetal aneuploidy, invasive testing during pregnancy remains the definitive diagnostic tool for fetal genetic anomalies. Results are rapidly available with polymerase chain reaction (PCR) tests, but cases have been reported whereby initial results were not confirmed after pregnancy termination and the fetal karyotype was ultimately normal. We sought to examine the potential discordance between PCR and karyotype for fetal aneuploidy. Methods The results from all amniocentesis and CVS tests performed over a 6-year period in a large tertiary level fetal medicine unit were reviewed. The results of PCR and karyotype were recorded and discrepancies examined. Pregnancy outcomes were also recorded. Results A total of 1222 invasive tests were performed (716 amniocentesis and 506 CVS). Within the cohort having amniocentesis, 11 had discrepant results (normal QF-PCR result but with a subsequent abnormal karyotype). There was 1 case among this group which QF-PCR should have identified. Within the CVS group, 7 patients had discrepant results. All had a diploid QF-PCR and would not have been identified as abnormal by it. Conclusion PCR can be reliably used to determine aneuploidy of chromosomes 13, 18, and 21. However, in cases of sex chromosome aneuploidy, its performance is less reliable and warrants waiting for a complete karyotype. Given such discordance, we advise waiting for karyotype for all invasive tests performed in the presence of a normal ultrasound before advising a patient of a diploid QF-PCR result or potentially terminating a normal pregnancy.

Maternal hyperoxygenation has been investigated as a potential diagnostic and therapeutic tool since the 1960s. Since then, it has been applied in many obstetric scenarios, both clinically and in the research setting. It is often administered without any determination of pre-hyperoxygenation maternal or fetal oxygen levels. Studies focussing on maternal oxygen therapy for the treatment of fetal growth restriction have been ongoing for over thirty years and there remains no clear evidence of benefit. Studies investigating the potential diagnostic or therapeutic role of maternal oxygen therapy in the setting of fetal congenital cardiac disease have reported varying success rates and some potentially worrying adverse effects. The purpose of this article is to review the effects of maternal hyperoxygenation on fetal and maternal health and to ascertain the safety of undertaking further clinical trials that employ the use of hyperoxygenation in pregnancy.

BACKGROUND Telemedicine offers a promising solution to the healthcare demands associated with the increasing prevalence of gestational diabetes (GDM). Due to near pervasive levels of smartphone ownership and advances in capabilities of information and communication technology, app-assisted healthcare can facilitate the remote surveillance of important parameters of GDM care. The maintenance of hospital oversight of patients engaging in app-based care is paramount to ensure identification of sub-optimal glycaemic control, compliance with self-monitoring schedules and provision of accurate and accessible educational resources. OBJECTIVE We sought to identify studies evaluating feedback performance of smartphone app-assisted healthcare programmes enabling the remote surveillance of gestational diabetes. The assessment and achievement of glycaemic control following adoption of such app-assisted healthcare delivery programmes was our primary outcome measure. Secondary outcomes included patient and staff satisfaction levels and cost effectiveness of app-based interventions. METHODS A comprehensive search of the electronic databases Pubmed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science and the Cochrane library was performed. Two independent reviewers screened the titles and subsequently selected and reviewed eligible studies. The initial search yielded 954 references. De-duplication and removal of irrelevant studies identified 105 studies for full text screening. Ultimately, 17 studies exploring feedback related app-assisted healthcare among 1891 patients with GDM met criteria for inclusion in the final review. RESULTS All seventeen reviewed studies facilitated direct uploading of glycaemic data from the glucometer to the smartphone app. Other variables captured by the described apps included diet and exercise patterns, blood pressure, ketonuria and heart rate. Bidirectional communication was the most commonly employed contact strategy between app-users and their hospital care teams. Feedback was facilitated through the app interface in an automated manner or by personal staff to patient messages in the remainder. Rates of adverse maternal or neonatal outcomes were not affected by app-users. Satisfaction with app-based management was overwhelmingly positive for both app-users and their obstetric diabetes teams. Economic assessment and resource utilisation were only explored in five studies, however, evidence in favour of benefit for app-assisted surveillance was the predominant outcome. CONCLUSIONS This scoping review provides a comprehensive overview of the availability and functionality of smartphone applications capable of the generation of remote feedback in the surveillance of women with gestational diabetes. The evidence collated by this review demonstrates equivalent or improved glycaemic control among women engaging in smartphone app-assisted healthcare for GDM surveillance. Incorporation of smartphone app-based surveillance is feasible and acceptable with beneficial effects envisaged from an economic and resource availability perspective.

The ability to predict the need for emergency Cesarean delivery holds the potential to facilitate birth choices. The objective of the RECIPE study (Reducing Emergency Cesarean delivery and Improving the Primiparous Experience) was to externally validate a Cesarean delivery risk prediction model. This model, developed by the Genesis study, identified five key predictive factors for emergency Cesarean delivery: maternal age, maternal height, BMI, fetal head circumference (HC) and fetal abdominal circumference (AC).This prospective, observational study was conducted in two tertiary referral perinatal centers. Inclusion criteria were as follows: primiparous women with a singleton, cephalic presentation fetus in the absence of fetal growth restriction (FGR), oligohydramnios, pre-eclampsia, pre-existing diabetes mellitus or an indication for planned Cesarean delivery. Between 38 + 0 and 40 + 6 weeks' gestational age, participants attended for prenatal assessment that enabled the determination of an individualized risk calculation for emergency Cesarean delivery during labour based on maternal height, BMI, fetal HC and AC, with crucially both participants and care providers being blinded to the resultant risk prediction score. Labor, delivery and postnatal outcomes were ascertained. Calibration and receiver operator curves were generated to determine the predictive capacity for emergency Cesarean delivery of the Genesis risk prediction model in this cohort.559 primiparous participants were enrolled from May 2017 to April 2019, of whom 142 (25 %) had an emergency Cesarean delivery during labour. Participants with a low predicted risk score (10 %) had a mean predicted rate of 8% (+/- standard deviation of 2%) and a similarly low actual observed rate of Cesarean delivery (8%). Participants with a high predicted risk (50 %) had a mean predicted Cesarean delivery rate of 64 % (+/- standard deviation of 9%) and also had a high actual observed Cesarean delivery rate (62 %). The calibration curve and receiver operating characteristic curve demonstrated that this validation study had comparable discriminatory power for emergency Cesarean delivery to that described in the original Genesis study. The Area Under the Curve (AUC) in Genesis was 0.69, whereas the AUC in RECIPE was 0.72, which reflects good predictive capacity of the risk prediction model.The accuracy of the Genesis Cesarean delivery prediction tool is supported by this validation study.

Background Supplemental oxygen is administered to pregnant women in many different clinical scenarios in obstetric practice. Despite the accepted uses for maternal hyperoxygenation, the impact of hyperoxia on maternal hemodynamic indices has not been evaluated. As a result, there is a paucity of data in the literature in relation to the physiological changes to the maternal circulation in response to supplemental oxygen. Objective The hemodynamic effects of oxygen therapy are under-recognized and the impact of hyperoxygenation on maternal hemodynamics is currently unknown. Using noninvasive cardiac output monitoring which employs transthoracic bioreactance, we examined the effect of brief hyperoxygenation on cardiac index, systemic vascular resistance, blood pressure, stroke volume, and heart rate in pregnant mothers during the third trimester, compared with those effects observed in a nonpregnant population subjected to the same period of hyperoxygenation. Study Design Hemodynamic monitoring was performed in a continuous manner over a 30-minute period using noninvasive cardiac output monitoring. Hyperoxygenation (O2 100% v/v inhalational gas) was carried out at a rate of 12 L/min via a partial non-rebreather mask for 10-minutes. Cardiac index, systemic vascular resistance, stroke volume, heart rate, and blood pressure were recorded before hyperoxygenation, at completion of hyperoxygenation, and 10 minutes after the cessation of hyperoxygenation. Two-way analysis of variance with repeated measures was used to assess the change in hemodynamic indices over time and the differences between the 2 groups. Results Forty-six pregnant and 20 nonpregnant women with a median age of 33 years (interquartile range, 26–38 years) and 32 years (interquartile range, 28-37 years) were recruited prospectively, respectively (P=.82). The median gestational age was 35 weeks (33–37 weeks). In the pregnant group, there was a fall in cardiac index during the hyperoxygenation exposure period (P=.009) coupled with a rise in systemic vascular resistance with no recovery at 10 minutes after cessation of hyperoxygenation (P=.02). Heart rate decreased after hyperoxygenation exposure and returned to baseline by 10 minutes after cessation of therapy. There was a decrease in stroke volume over the exposure period, with no change in systolic or diastolic blood pressure. In the nonpregnant group, there was no significant change in the cardiac index, systemic vascular resistance, stroke volume, heart rate, or systolic or diastolic blood pressure during the course of exposure to hyperoxygenation. Conclusion Hyperoxygenation during the third trimester is associated with a fall in maternal cardiac index and a rise in systemic vascular resistance without recovery to baseline levels at 10 minutes after cessation of hyperoxygenation. The hemodynamic changes that were observed in this study in response to hyperoxygenation therapy during pregnancy could counteract any intended increase in oxygen delivery. The observed maternal effects of hyperoxygenation call for a reevaluation of the role of hyperoxygenation treatment in the nonhypoxemic pregnant patient.

peer-reviewed Objective Increased fetal size is associated with shoulder dystocia during labor and subsequent need for assisted delivery. We sought to investigate if increased fetal adiposity diagnosed sonographically in late pregnancy is associated with increased risk of operative delivery. Methods This secondary analysis of the Genesis Study recruited 2392 nulliparous women with singleton pregnancy in cephalic presentation, in a prospective, multicenter study, to examine prenatal and intrapartum predictors of Cesarean delivery. Participants underwent ultrasound and clinical evaluation between 39 + 0 and 40 + 6 weeks' gestation. Data on fetal biometry were not revealed to patients or to their managing clinicians. A fetal adiposity composite of fetal thigh adiposity and fetal abdominal wall thickness was compiled for each infant in order to determine whether fetal adiposity > 90th centile was associated with an increased risk of Cesarean or operative vaginal delivery. Results After exclusions, data were available for 2330 patients. Patients with a fetal adiposity composite > 90th centile had a higher maternal body mass index (BMI) (25 ± 5 kg/m2 vs 24 ± 4 kg/m2; P = 0.005), birth weight (3872 ± 417 g vs 3585 ± 401 g; P 90th centile were more likely to require Cesarean delivery than were those with adiposity composite ≤ 90th centile (P 90th centile remained a risk factor for Cesarean delivery (P 90th centile was more predictive of the need for unplanned Cesarean delivery than was an estimated fetal weight > 90th centile (odds ratio, 2.20 (95% CI, 1.65–2.94; P 90th centile was not associated with an increased likelihood of operative vaginal delivery when compared with having an adiposity composite ≤ 90th centile (P = 0.37). Conclusions Fetuses with increased adipose deposition are more likely to require Cesarean delivery than are those without increased adiposity. Consideration should, therefore, be given to adding fetal thigh adiposity and abdominal wall thickness to fetal sonographic assessment in late pregnancy. Copyright © 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. ACCEPTED peer-reviewed

A diagnosis of type I or type 2 diabetes confers heightened risk for virtually every obstetric and perinatal complication, with the incidence of superimposed preeclampsia representing a particularly high-risk scenario. Over the past three decades, studies have investigated the role of aspirin in preeclampsia prevention, yielding some promising results for certain at-risk groups, yet unconvincing evidence of benefit among women with pre-pregnancy diabetes. The purpose of this review is to present the current evidence base for aspirin use in pregnancy as a means of mitigating preeclampsia risk in the setting of pregestational type I or type 2 diabetes. Meta-analysis data examining low-dose aspirin for preeclampsia prevention in at-risk and low-risk women has demonstrated modest benefit, but subanalyses of cohorts with diabetes have failed to demonstrate a beneficial effect. Evidence is emerging that indicates a benefit only among women who initiate aspirin therapy prior to 16 weeks’ gestation, and uncertainty exists surrounding the effective dose. In light of equipoise surrounding the potential role of aspirin for prevention of preeclampsia in women with diabetes, current research is targeted at determining clinical efficacy of aspirin in this high-risk obstetric population.

Background Persistent pulmonary hypertension of the newborn (PPHN) is a condition that occurs in 0.5–7 per 1000 live births and can result in significant cardiovascular instability in the newborn. It occurs when there is a failure of the normal circulatory transition in the early newborn period. Recent studies have shown that fetal pulmonary vasculature reacts to maternal hyperoxygenation (MH). The aim of the study is to assess if the in-utero response to MH can predict pulmonary hypertension in the early newborn period. Methods We will perform a prospective cohort study. It will evaluate the use of fetal echocardiographic Doppler assessment of the pulmonary vasculature prior to and following MH to predict fetuses that may develop pulmonary hypertension in the neonatal period. The study will be undertaken in the Rotunda Hospital, Dublin, Ireland. A fetal ultrasound and echocardiography will be performed on fetuses in the third trimester. Blood flow velocity waveforms will be recorded during periods of fetal quiescence. Pulsatility index (PI), Resistance index (RI), Peak systolic (PSV) and end diastolic velocity (EDV), time-averaged velocity (TAV), acceleration time (AT), and ejection time (ET) will be measured within the fetal distal pulmonary artery (PA). The acceleration-to-ejection time ratio (AT: ET) will be used to assess pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR). Doppler measurements will be taken at baseline and repeated immediately following MH for 10 min (O2 100% v/v inhalational gas) at a rate of 12L/min via a partial non-rebreather mask. Doppler waveform measurements from the umbilical artery (UAD), middle cerebral artery (MCA) ductus arteriosus (DA), aortic isthmus (AoI) and ductus venosus (DV) will also be obtained. After birth, a comprehensive neonatal functional echocardiogram will be performed within the first 24 hours of life. Discussion This study proposes to validate methods described to date in investigating the fetal pulmonary vascular response to MH, with expansion of the study subjects to include fetuses at risk of PPHN. Evaluation of the different at-risk subgroups will be informative in relation to the fetal circulatory adaptation close to term. Prediction of neonatal pulmonary hypertension may help guide the pharmacological and neonatal ICU strategies that optimise postnatal survival.

Abstract The reactivity of the pulmonary vascular bed to the administration of oxygen is well established in the post-natal circulation. The vasoreactivity demonstrated by the fetal pulmonary artery Doppler waveform in response to maternal hyperoxia has been investigated. We sought to investigate the relationship between the reactivity of the fetal pulmonary arteries to hyperoxia and subsequent neonatal cardiac function in the early newborn period. Methods This explorative study with convenience sampling measured pulsatility index (PI), resistance index (RI), acceleration time (AT), and ejection time (ET) from the fetal distal branch pulmonary artery (PA) at baseline and following maternal hyperoxygenation (MH). Oxygen was administered for 10 min at a rate of 12 L/min via a partial non-rebreather mask. A neonatal functional echocardiogram was performed within the first 24 h of life to assess ejection fraction (EF), left ventricular output (LVO), and neonatal pulmonary artery AT (nPAAT). This study was conducted in the Rotunda Hospital, Dublin, Ireland. Results Forty-six women with a singleton pregnancy greater than or equal to 31 weeks’ gestational age were prospectively recruited to the study. The median gestational age was 35 weeks. There was a decrease in fetal PAPI and PARI following MH and an increase in fetal PAAT, leading to an increase in PA AT:ET. Fetuses that responded to hyperoxygenation were more likely to have a higher LVO (135 ± 25 mL/kg/min vs 111 ± 21 mL/kg/min, p p = 0.03) in the early newborn period than those that did not respond to MH prenatally. These findings were not dependent on left ventricular size or mitral valve (MV) annular diameter but were related to an increased MV inflow. There was no difference in nPAAT. Conclusion These findings indicate a reduction in fetal pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) and an increase in pulmonary blood flow and left atrial return following MH. The fetal response to hyperoxia reflected an optimal adaptation to postnatal life with rapid reduction in PVR increasing measured cardiac output.

Contemporary approaches to monitoring quality of care in obstetrics often focus on comparing Cesarean Delivery rates. Varied rates can complicate interpretation of quality of care. We previously developed a risk prediction tool for nulliparous women who may require intrapartum Cesarean delivery which identified five key predictors. Our objective with this study was to ascertain if patient heterogeneity can account for much of the observed variation in Cesarean delivery rates, thereby enabling Cesarean delivery rates to be a better marker of quality of care.This is a secondary analysis of the Genesis study. This was a large prospective study of 2336 nulliparous singleton pregnancies recruited at seven hospitals. A heterogeneity score was calculated for each hospital. An adjusted Cesarean delivery rate was also calculated incorporating the heterogeneous risk score.A cut-off at the 90th percentile was determined for each predictive factor. Above the 90th percentile was considered to represent 'high risk' (with the exception of maternal height which identified those below the 10th percentile). The patient heterogeneous risk score was defined as the number of risk factors90th percentile (10th percentile for height). An unequal distribution of high-risk patients between centers was observed (p 0.001). The correlation between the Cesarean delivery rate and the patient heterogeneous risk score was high (0.76, p 0.05). When adjusted for patient heterogeneity, Cesarean delivery rates became closer aligned.Inter-institutional diversity is common. We suggest that crude comparison of Cesarean delivery rates between different hospitals as a marker of care quality is inappropriate. Allowing for marked differences in patient characteristics is essential for correct interpretation of such comparisons.

Objective This article evaluates the effect of low-dose aspirin on uterine artery (UtA) Doppler, placental volume, and vascularization flow indices in low-risk pregnancy. Study Design In this secondary analysis of the TEST randomized controlled trial, low-risk nulliparous women were originally randomized at 11 weeks to: (1) routine aspirin 75 mg; (2) no aspirin; and (3) aspirin based upon the preeclampsia Fetal Medicine Foundation screening test. UtA Doppler, three-dimensional (3D) placental volume, and vascularization flow indices were assessed prior to and 6 weeks postaspirin commencement. Results A total of 546 women were included (aspirin n = 192, no aspirin n = 354). Between first and second trimesters, aspirin use was not associated with a change in UtA Doppler, placental volume, or vascular flow indices. There was no significant difference in the change in UtA Doppler pulsatility index (PI) Z-scores or notching (PI Z-score –0.2 vs. –0.2, p = 0.17), nor was there a significant change in placental volume Z-score and vascular flow indices (volume Z-score change: 0.74 vs. 0.62, p = 0.34). Conclusion Low-dose aspirin commenced at 11 weeks in low-risk women does not appear to improve uterine and placental perfusion or placental volume. Any perceived effect on uteroplacental vasculature is not reflected in changes in placental volume nor uteroplacental flow as assessed by two-dimensional and 3D ultrasound.

To evaluate the capacity of the current system of obstetric risk stratification at the outset of pregnancy to predict severe adverse perinatal outcome.This retrospective cohort study of singleton pregnancies over a five year period (2009-2013) was performed at the Rotunda Hospital, Dublin, Ireland. High-risk or low-risk status was assigned retrospectively to a large consecutive cohort of women with a normally-formed singleton pregnancy on the basis of factors analyzed at the first prenatal hospital visit. The incidence of severe perinatal morbidity and mortality were compared between high- and low-risk groups to determine the predictive utility of risk stratification at the outset of pregnancy for severe perinatal morbidity.During the study period, 41,044 patients registered for prenatal care. 25,702;(63%) were deemed low-risk and 15,342;(37%) high-risk. Low-risk women were statistically more likely to be nulliparous (p 0.0001) and to have a spontaneous or operative vaginal delivery (p 0.0001). High-risk women were more likely to be multiparous and to undergo Caesarean delivery (p 0.0001). The perinatal mortality rate was 3.8 per-1000 in low-risk pregnancies and 6.1 per-1000 in the a priori high-risk group (p = 0.012). The incidence of severe neonatal encephalopathy (NNE) was 1.8 and 0.65 per-1000 in the low and high-risk groups respectively (p = 0.0025).Where low-risk status is assigned at registration, neonatal encephalopathy is more prevalent. This data is relevant for the design of prenatal care models and demonstrates that assignment of low obstetric risk on the basis of maternal or pre-pregnancy factors alone may erroneously be interpreted as conferring low-risk status to the fetus.

Objectives: Screening and diagnosis of gestational diabetes (GDM) has been a source of controversy. The prevalence has increased in line with an obesity epidemic and a trend towards delayed child-bearing. Treatment of even modest glycaemic impairment in pregnancy has been shown to be beneficial in preventing its clinical sequalae. However the cumbersome nature and timing of the oral glucose tolerance test coupled with debate around universal versus risk factor based screening have been problematic. This group aimed to investigate a panel of biomarkers which have shown promise in the literature to predict GDM from the first trimester in a group of high risk women. Methods: Serum samples were drawn on 248 women deemed at risk of GDM before 15 weeks' gestation to measure C-reactive protein, sex hormone binding globulin, adiponectin and 1,5 anhydroglucitol. Patients underwent an oral glucose tolerance test as per IADPSG criteria at 28 weeks' gestation. Multiple logistic regression was used to examine the link between incidence of GDM and early pregnancy serum biomarkers. Results: Adiponectin levels in the first trimester are independently linked to the risk of GDM. Serum adiponectin

Objective To determine whether the addition of placental growth factor (PlGF) measurement to current clinical assessment of women with suspected pre-eclampsia before 37 weeks' gestation would reduce maternal morbidity without increasing neonatal morbidity. Design Stepped wedge cluster randomised control trial from 29 June 2017 to 26 April 2019. Setting National multisite trial in seven maternity hospitals throughout the island of Ireland Participants Women with a singleton pregnancy between 20 +0 to 36 +6 weeks’ gestation, with signs or symptoms suggestive of evolving pre-eclampsia. Of the 5718 women screened, 2583 were eligible and 2313 elected to participate. Intervention Participants were assigned randomly to either usual care or to usual care plus the addition of point-of-care PlGF testing based on the randomisation status of their maternity hospital at the time point of enrolment. Main outcomes measures Co-primary outcomes of composite maternal morbidity and composite neonatal morbidity. Analysis was on an individual participant level using mixed-effects Poisson regression adjusted for time effects (with robust standard errors) by intention-to-treat. Results Of the 4000 anticipated recruitment target, 2313 eligible participants (57%) were enrolled, of whom 2219 (96%) were included in the primary analysis. Of these, 1202 (54%) participants were assigned to the usual care group, and 1017 (46%) were assigned the intervention of additional point-of-care PlGF testing. The results demonstrate that the integration of point-of-care PlGF testing resulted in no evidence of a difference in maternal morbidity—457/1202 (38%) of women in the control group versus 330/1017 (32%) of women in the intervention group (adjusted risk ratio (RR) 1.01 (95% CI 0.76 to 1.36), P=0.92)—or in neonatal morbidity—527/1202 (43%) of neonates in the control group versus 484/1017 (47%) in the intervention group (adjusted RR 1.03 (0.89 to 1.21), P=0.67). Conclusions This was a pragmatic evaluation of an interventional diagnostic test, conducted nationally across multiple sites. These results do not support the incorporation of PlGF testing into routine clinical investigations for women presenting with suspected preterm pre-eclampsia, but nor do they exclude its potential benefit. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02881073 .

Background: Preeclampsia, preterm birth and low birth weight represent key contributing factors to perinatal morbidity and mortality. Pregnancies complicated by type 1 and type 2 diabetes are at increased risk of these complications, which are purported to be largely attributed to placental dysfunction. Studies investigating a potential role for aspirin therapy in optimizing perinatal outcome have consistently failed to demonstrate a benefit among women with pre-existing diabetes, and yet widespread aspirin administration has become common practice in many centres. This study seeks to examine the effect of aspirin therapy, administered from the first trimester until 36 weeks gestation, on perinatal outcome in women with established pre-pregnancy diabetes. Our hypothesis is that aspirin therapy will reduce complications mediated by placental dysfunction, and improve perinatal outcomes. Methods: This phase III double-blinded, placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial will be conducted in seven tertiary-level perinatology centres in Ireland. Consenting participants who meet all eligibility criteria will be allocated randomly to either aspirin 150 mg once daily or matching placebo, commenced between 11 + 0 and 13 + 6 weeks. Allocation will take place electronically using software by Clininfo with randomization tables provided by the trial biostatistician. The primary outcome will be a composite clinical measure of placental dysfunction (preeclampsia, preterm birth before 34 weeks, birthweight below the 10th centile or perinatal mortality). This trial has been set up such that it is parallel in design and is a superiority study. No participants have been recruited yet. The trial has been registered with Eudra Clinical Trials - EudraCT Number 2018-000770-29. Funding for this trial was granted by the Health research Board (HRB) 1/9/2017(DIFA-2017-026). Discussion: Aspirin therapy has been investigated for the prevention of preeclampsia owing to its reduction on thromboxane production. Previous studies have failed to demonstrate a beneficial effect of aspirin on perinatal outcome amongst women with type I or type II diabetes. It is plausible that the failure to observe benefit to date, among the limited aspirin studies that have included participants with diabetes, may be a consequence of aspirin initiation too late in pregnancy to exert any effect on placentation. We believe that if aspirin is to be used for the prevention of placental dysfunction, it must be initiated before the second active phase of trophoblast invasion, which takes place from 14 weeks’ gestation onwards. No randomized trials investigating the role of aspirin in prevention of preeclampsia in pregnancies complicated by diabetes have previously initiated treatment in the first trimester, the gestational period at which it is most likely to exert an effect on placentation. Keywords: Aspirin, Pregnancy, Diabetes, Pre-eclampsia

Remote monitoring health data analysis holds the potential to reduce pregnancy complications, improve patients' quality of life, enhance the efficiency of healthcare delivery and reduce healthcare costs. In this paper, we present a method based on fuzzy inference systems to monitor pregnancies complicated by gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). The system is simple, fast, flexible and exploits domain expertise in assessing risk levels according to capillary glucose levels from women with GDM. We show that this approach generates an interpretable input, which is valuable in medical applications. To prove the capabilities of the system, we present prediction results from 50 real-world patients and show that the system obtains relevant glycaemic-control data comparable to current monitoring methods that rely on periodic face-to-face physician review. Our systems achieves 95% accuracy. Moreover, we show that the difference in predictions account for a more personalized treatment.

The objective was to evaluate whether routine aspirin 75 mg is more cost-effective than the Fetal Medicine Foundation screen-and-treat approach for preeclampsia prevention in low-risk nulliparous women. A health economic decision analytical model was devised to estimate the discounted net health and cost outcomes of routine aspirin versus Fetal Medicine Foundation screening test-indicated aspirin for a cohort of 100 000 low-risk nulliparous women. Both strategies were compared with no intervention. A subanalysis also compared disaggregated components of the algorithm. The analysis used data from hospital administration, literature, and a randomized controlled trial. Sensitivity analyses assessed the impact of aspirin adherence, test cost, and accuracy on study results. Presumed rates of preeclampsia were 3.75% with no intervention versus 0.45% with aspirin use. Results found that routine aspirin was the preferred strategy, in terms of greater health gains and larger cost savings. It provided 163 quality-adjusted life-years relative to no intervention, whereas the screen-and-treat policy achieved 108 quality-adjusted life-years. Routine aspirin would result in an estimated cost saving of €14.9 million annually relative to no intervention, whereas screen-and-treat approach would result in a smaller cost saving of €3.1 million. When the analysis was extended to consider alternative screen-and-treat strategies, routine aspirin remained the optimally cost-effective approach. In conclusion, routine aspirin use in low-risk nulliparous women has a greater health gain and cost saving compared with both the Fetal Medicine Foundation and other screen-and-treat approaches.

ObjectiveEvaluate the feasibility and acceptability of routine aspirin in low-risk women, compared with screening-test indicated aspirin for the prevention of pre-eclampsia and fetal growth restriction.DesignMulticentre open-label feasibility randomised controlled trial.SettingTwo tertiary maternity hospitals in Dublin, Ireland.Participants546 low-risk nulliparous women completed the study.InterventionsWomen underwent computerised randomisation to: Group 1—routine aspirin 75 mg from 11 until 36 weeks; Group 2—no aspirin and; Group 3—aspirin based on the Fetal Medicine Foundation screening test.Primary and secondary outcome measures(1) Proportion agreeing to participate; (2) compliance with protocol; (3) proportion where first trimester uterine artery Doppler was obtainable and; (4) time taken to issue a screening result. Secondary outcomes included rates of pre-eclampsia and small-for-gestational-age fetuses.Results546 were included in the routine aspirin (n=179), no aspirin (n=183) and screen and treat (n=184) groups. 546 of 1054 were approached (51.8%) and enrolled. Average aspirin adherence was 90%. The uterine artery Doppler was obtained in 98.4% (181/184) and the average time to obtain a screening result was 7.6 (0–26) days. Of those taking aspirin, vaginal spotting was greater; n=29 (15.1%), non-aspirin n=28 (7.9%), OR 2.1 (95% CI 1.2 to 3.6). Postpartum haemorrhage >500 mL was also greater; aspirin n=26 (13.5%), no aspirin n=20 (5.6%), OR 2.6 (95% CI 1.4 to 4.8).ConclusionLow-risk nulliparous women are open to taking aspirin in pregnancy and had high levels of adherence. Aspirin use was associated with greater rates of vaginal bleeding. An appropriately powered randomised controlled trial is now required to address the efficacy and safety of universal low-dose aspirin in low-risk pregnancy compared with a screening approach.Trial registration numberISRCTN (15191778); Post-results.

Background: 2·6 million pregnancies were estimated to have ended in stillbirth in 2015. The aim of the AFFIRM study was to test the hypothesis that introduction of a reduced fetal movement (RFM), care package for pregnant women and clinicians that increased women's awareness of the need for prompt reporting of RFM and that standardised management, including timely delivery, would alter the incidence of stillbirth.Methods: This stepped wedge, cluster-randomised trial was done in the UK and Ireland. Participating maternity hospitals were grouped and randomised, using a computer-generated allocation scheme, to one of nine intervention implementation dates (at 3 month intervals). This date was concealed from clusters and the trial team until 3 months before the implementation date. Each participating hospital had three observation periods: a control period from Jan 1, 2014, until randomised date of intervention initiation; a washout period from the implementation date and for 2 months; and the intervention period from the end of the washout period until Dec 31, 2016. Treatment allocation was not concealed from participating women and caregivers. Data were derived from observational maternity data. The primary outcome was incidence of stillbirth. The primary analysis was done according to the intention-to-treat principle, with births analysed according to whether they took place during the control or intervention periods, irrespective of whether the intervention had been implemented as planned. This study is registered with www.ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01777022.Findings: 37 hospitals were enrolled in the study. Four hospitals declined participation, and 33 hospitals were randomly assigned to an intervention implementation date. Between Jan 1, 2014, and Dec, 31, 2016, data were collected from 409 175 pregnancies (157 692 deliveries during the control period, 23 623 deliveries in the washout period, and 227 860 deliveries in the intervention period). The incidence of stillbirth was 4·40 per 1000 births during the control period and 4·06 per 1000 births in the intervention period (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0·90, 95% CI 0·75–1·07; p=0·23).Interpretation: The RFM care package did not reduce the risk of stillbirths. The benefits of a policy that promotes awareness of RFM remains unproven.Funding: Chief Scientist Office, Scottish Government (CZH/4/882), Tommy's Centre for Maternal and Fetal Health, Sands.

Increased duration of the second stage of labor provides clinical challenges in decision-making regarding the optimal mode of delivery that minimizes maternal and neonatal morbidity.In a large cohort of uncomplicated nulliparous singleton cephalic labors, we sought to examine the effect of increasing duration of second stage on delivery and perinatal outcome.The GENESIS Study recruited 2336 nulliparous patients with vertex presentation in a prospective double-blinded study to examine prenatal and intrapartum predictors of delivery. Metrics included maternal demographics, duration of second stage, mode of delivery, and associated maternal and neonatal outcomes. Indicators of morbidity included third- or fourth-degree tear, postpartum hemorrhage, neonatal intensive care unit admission, low Apgar scores, cord pH7.20 and a composite of birth injury that included cephalohematoma, fetal laceration, brachial plexus palsy, facial nerve palsy, and fetal fracture.Of 2336 recruited nulliparous participants, 1872 reached the second stage of labor and had complete data for analysis. Increased maternal age (P=.02) and birthweight (P.001) were found to be associated with a longer second stage. Increasing second stage duration was found to impact on mode of delivery, such that at1 hour duration the spontaneous vaginal delivery rate was 63% vs 24% at3 hours (P.001). Operative vaginal delivery increased from 35% at1 hour to 65% at3 hours (P.001). The rate of cesarean delivery increased with duration of the second stage from 1.2% at1 hour to 11% at3 hours (P.001). The rates of third- or fourth-degree tear increased with second stage duration (P=.003), as did postpartum hemorrhage (P.001). The composite neonatal birth injury rate increased from 1.8% at1 hour to 3.4% at3 hours. The maximum rate of birth injury was 6.5% at 2-3 hours (P.001). Multiple logistic regression analysis that controlled for maternal age and birthweight confirmed that operative vaginal delivery, perineal trauma, postpartum hemorrhage, and neonatal birth injury remained significantly more likely with increasing second stage duration.In a prospective cohort of nulliparous pregnancies, increasing duration of second stage of labor was associated with increased rates of operative vaginal and cesarean delivery. Although almost 90% of term nulliparous women with a second stage of labor3 hours will succeed in achieving a vaginal birth, this success comes at a maternal morbidity cost, with a 10% risk of severe perineal injury and an increasing rate of significant neonatal injury.

To establish if first or second trimester biometry is a useful adjunct in the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome in twin pregnancy.A consecutive cohort of 1028 twin pregnancies was enrolled for the Evaluation of Sonographic Predictors of Restricted growth in Twins (ESPRiT) study, a prospective study conducted at eight academic centers. Outcome data was recorded for 1001 twin pairs that completed the study. Ultrasound biometry was available for 960 pregnancies. Biometric data obtained between 11 and 22 weeks were evaluated as predictors of a composite of adverse perinatal outcome (mortality, hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy, periventricular leukomalacia, necrotizing enterocolitis, respiratory distress, or sepsis), preterm delivery (PTD) and birthweight discordance greater than 18% (18% BW). Outcomes were adjusted for chorionicity and gestational age using Cox Proportional Hazards regression.Differences in crown-rump length (CRL) were not predictive of adverse perinatal outcome. Between 14 and 22 weeks, a difference in abdominal circumference (AC) of more than 10% was the most useful predictor of adverse outcome, PTD and 18% or more BW discordance in all twins. Overall the strongest correlation was observed for intertwin differences in biometry between 18 and 22 weeks.Biometry in the early second trimester can successfully identify twin pregnancies at increased risk. Intertwin AC difference of greater than 10% between 14 and 22 weeks gestation was the best individual predictor of perinatal risk in all twins. Sonographic biometry in the early second trimester should therefore be utilized to establish perinatal risk, thus allowing prenatal care to be improved.

Background In contemporary practice many nulliparous women require intervention during childbirth such as operative vaginal delivery or cesarean delivery (CD). Despite the knowledge that the increasing rate of CD is associated with increasing maternal age, obesity and larger infant birthweight, we lack a reliable method to predict the requirement for such potentially hazardous obstetric procedures during labor and delivery. This issue is important, as there are greater rates of morbidity and mortality associated with unplanned CD performed in labor compared with scheduled CDs. A prediction algorithm to identify women at risk of an unplanned CD could help reduced labor associated morbidity. Objective In this primary analysis of the Genesis study, our objective was to prospectively assess the use of prenatally determined, maternal and fetal, anthropomorphic, clinical, and ultrasound features to develop a predictive tool for unplanned CD in the term nulliparous woman, before the onset of labor. Materials and Methods The Genesis study recruited 2336 nulliparous women with a vertex presentation between 39+0 and 40+6 weeks' gestation in a prospective multicenter national study to examine predictors of CD. At recruitment, a detailed clinical evaluation and ultrasound assessment were performed. To reduce bias from knowledge of these data potentially influencing mode of delivery, women, midwives, and obstetricians were blinded to the ultrasound data. All hypothetical prenatal risk factors for unplanned CD were assessed as a composite. Multiple logistic regression analysis and mathematical modeling was used to develop a risk evaluation tool for CD in nulliparous women. Continuous predictors were standardized using z scores. Results From a total enrolled cohort of 2336 nulliparous participants, 491 (21%) had an unplanned CD. Five parameters were determined to be the best combined predictors of CD. These were advancing maternal age (odds ratio [OR], 1.21; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.09 to 1.34), shorter maternal height (OR, 1.72; 95% CI, 1.52 to 1.93), increasing body mass index (OR, 1.29; 95% CI, 1.17 to 1.43), larger fetal abdominal circumference (OR, 1.23; 95% CI, 1.1 to 1.38), and larger fetal head circumference (OR, 1.27; 95% CI, 1.14 to 1.42). A nomogram was developed to provide an individualized risk assessment to predict CD in clinical practice, with excellent calibration and discriminative ability (Kolmogorov–Smirnov, D statistic, 0.29; 95% CI, 0.28 to 0.30) with a misclassification rate of 0.21 (95% CI, 0.19 to 0.25). Conclusion Five parameters (maternal age, body mass index, height, fetal abdominal circumference, and fetal head circumference) can, in combination, be used to better determine the overall risk of CD in nulliparous women at term. A risk score can be used to inform women of their individualized probability of CD. This risk tool may be useful for reassuring most women regarding their likely success at achieving an uncomplicated vaginal delivery as well as selecting those patients with such a high risk for CD that they should avoid a trial of labor. Such a risk tool has the potential to greatly improve planning hospital service needs and minimizing patient risk.