Search

Context: The leg acts as a linear spring during running and hopping and adapts to the stiffness of the surface, maintaining constant total stiffness of the leg-surface system. Introducing a substance (eg, footwear) may affect the stiffness of the leg in response to changes in surface stiffness. Objective: To determine if the type of athletic footwear affects the regulation of leg stiffness in dynamic activities. Design: Repeated-measures design. Setting: Motion analysis laboratory. Patients or Other Participants: Nine healthy adults (age = 28 +/- 6.8 years, mass = 71.6 +/- 12.9 kg) free from lower extremity injuries. Intervention(s): Subjects hopped at 2.2 Hz on a forceplate under 3 footwear conditions (barefoot, low-cost footwear, highcost footwear). Subjects ran on a treadmill at 2 speeds (2.23 m/s, 3.58 m/s) under the same footwear conditions. Main Outcome Measure(s): Limb stiffness was calculated from forceplate data. Kinematic data (knee and ankle angles at initial contact and peak joint excursion after contact) were collected during running. We calculated 1-way repeated-measures (stiffness) and 2-way (speed by footwear) repeated-measures analyses of variance (running kinematics) to test the dependent variables. Results: A significant increase in leg stiffness from the barefoot to the 'cushioned' shoe condition was noted during hopping. When running shod, runners landed in more dorsiflexion but had less ankle motion than when running barefoot. No differences were seen between the types of shoes. The primary kinematic difference was identified as running speed increased: runners landed in more knee flexion. At the ankle, barefoot runners increased ankle motion to a significantly greater extent than did shod runners as speed increased. Conclusions: Footwear influences the maintenance of stiffness in the lower extremity during hopping and joint excursion at the ankle in running. Differences in cushioning properties of the shoes tested did not appear to be significant. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Presents information on the use of prophylactic ankle braces by athletic trainers as a means of reducing the risk of ankle injuries. Effect of braces on foot biomechanics; Types of prophylactic braces; Efficiency of braces.

The objective of this study was to determine if posture during gait can be affected by position of the load. It was hypothesized that the front pack would result in postural changes in the gait cycle, compared to a similarly loaded backpack. Thirteen healthy adults, free of any injury, volunteered to participate in this study. Two dimensional video data were collected at 50 Hz using a MacReflex video system. A backpack and a front pack were compared using loads of 10 and 15% of body weight. Markers were placed on the ear, acromion, greater trochanter and lateral joint line of the knee, lateral malleolus and fifth metatarsophalangeal joint. Data were collected while the participants walked at 0.75 stride/s. The data were used to calculate joint angles and displacements during each gait cycle. There was a significant difference noted in angles of the hip flexion, with the backpack condition demonstrating a greater flexion in each stride than either the control or front pack. Both backpack and front pack conditions demonstrated a significant change in neck motion compared to the control condition. The results of the position analysis over time also revealed an increase in the forward head position when participants were wearing the backpack compared to either the control or the front pack condition. It was concluded that the use of a front pack results in a more upright posture in gait, when compared to a backpack carrying the same load.

Background: Running and hopping involve moving in a bouncing fashion during which the limbs behave as springs. The ability to alter the stiffness of these leg springs is essential to maintaining an efficient gait. Since the plantar surface of the foot is the only part of the body to encounter the ground during bipedal locomotion, it would seem logical that some aspect of the neurological functioning of the foot is responsible for transmission of information about the surface characteristics to the central nervous system, resulting in changes in leg stiffness., Methods: Ten subjects (9 males, 1 female) participated in this experiment. Lidocaine was injected inferior and posterior to the lateral malleolus in order to achieve tibial nerve block at the level of the ankle. Subjects hopped at 2.2 Hz on a force plate while data were collected at 1000 Hz. Data were analyzed for peak force and leg stiffness and compared using a repeated measures ANOVA., Findings: Tactile sensation, deep pressure sensation, and abductor hallucis activity displayed significant decreases following the injection, as did postural stability. Subjects demonstrated a significantly decreased leg stiffness after the nerve block (P<.01)., Interpretation: Plantar sensation has an effect on regulating leg mechanics in hopping. A loss of sensation in this region can exert a significant impact on the properties of the leg in gait, and future research should determine the specific pathways by which plantar feedback exerts this effect.

Much of the work describing support of the medial longitudinal arch has focused on the plantar fascia and the extrinsic muscles. There is little research concerning the function of intrinsic muscles in the maintenance of the medial longitudinal arch. Ten healthy volunteer adults served as subjects for this study, which was approved by the University Investigational Review Board. The height of the navicular tubercle above the floor was measured in both feet while subjects were seated with the foot in a subtalar neutral position and then when standing in a relaxed calcaneal stance. Subtalar neutral was found by palpating for talar congruency. Recordings of muscle activity from the abductor hallucis muscle were performed while the subjects maintained a maximal voluntary contraction in a supine position by plantarflexing their great toes. An injection of lidocaine (1% with epinephrine) was then administered by a Board-certified orthopedic surgeon in the region of the tibial nerve, posterior and inferior to the medial malleolus. Measurements were repeated and compared by using a paired t test. After the nerve block, the muscle activity was 26.8% of the control condition (P =.011). This corresponded with an increase in navicular drop of 3.8 mm. (P =.022). The observation that navicular drop increased when the activity of the intrinsic muscles decreased indicates that the intrinsic pedal muscles play an important role in support of the medial longitudinal arch.

During gait initiation (GI), decoupling of the center of mass and center of pressure allows the center of mass to fall forwards. Subjects initiated gait rapidly before and after tibial nerve block of the tibial nerve. Static single limb stability, stance limb ground reaction forces, electromyogram and temporal data were measured. It was hypothesized that postural stability would decrease post-block and that this would affect the kinetic and temporal properties of GI. Subjects had significantly decreased postural stability post-block and changes in normal gait kinetics, however, no changes were noted in ground reaction forces or relative temporal data of the GI task. The finding that GI was unaffected by diminished single leg postural instability suggests that GI is a pre-programmed task.