Picower Institute for Learning and Memory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Fong, Ming-fai, Finnie, Peter Sb, Kim, Taekeun, Thomazeau, Aurore, Kaplan, Eitan S, Cooke, Samuel F, Bear, Mark F, Picower Institute for Learning and Memory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Fong, Ming-fai, Finnie, Peter Sb, Kim, Taekeun, Thomazeau, Aurore, Kaplan, Eitan S, Cooke, Samuel F, and Bear, Mark F
© 2020 Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. Primary visual cortex (V1) is the locus of numerous forms of experience-dependent plasticity. Restricting visual stimulation to one eye at a time has revealed that many such forms of plasticity are eye-specific, indicating that synaptic modification occurs prior to binocular integration of thalamocortical inputs. A common feature of these forms of plasticity is the requirement for NMDA receptor (NMDAR) activation in V1.We therefore hypothesized that NMDARs in cortical layer 4 (L4), which receives the densest thalamocortical input, would be necessary for all forms of NMDAR-dependent and input-specific V1 plasticity.We tested this hypothesis in awake mice using a genetic approach to selectively delete NMDARs from L4 principal cells.We found, unexpectedly, that both stimulus-selective response potentiation and potentiation of open-eye responses following monocular deprivation (MD) persist in the absence of L4 NMDARs. In contrast, MD-driven depression of deprived-eye responses was impaired in mice lacking L4 NMDARs, as was L4 long-term depression in V1 slices. Our findings reveal a crucial requirement for L4 NMDARs in visual cortical synaptic depression, and a surprisingly negligible role for them in cortical response potentiation. These results demonstrate that NMDARs within distinct cellular subpopulations support different forms of experience-dependent plasticity.