Search

The Revised upper limb module (RULM) has been increasingly used in clinical trials and in clinical settings. The aim of this study was to use the 'shift analysis' to assess the patterns of lost or gained abilities for each item on the RULM in an untreated cohort, stratified by SMA type, age, SMN2 copy number, and motor functional status. The analysis was performed on 222 12-month paired assessments from 129 individuals (115 assessment from type II and 107 from type III) who had at least two assessments at yearly intervals. There was a loss of one or more activities in 54% in type II and in 29% type III. A gain of one or more activities was found in 42% type II and in 22% type III. There were concomitant gains and losses in 27% in SMA II and in 9% in SMA III. Our results, measuring the number of abilities that are lost or gained, provide an additional method of detecting changes that can be used for the interpretation of the longitudinal data collected in treated SMA individuals., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Giorgia Coratti reports personal fees from BIOGEN S.R.L. ITALIA, ROCHE, GENESIS PHARMA, NOVARTIS, Biologix, outside the submitted work. Dr Coratti is affiliated with an institution that receives funds for a SMA disease registry (ISMAR); Roberto de Sanctis reports personal fees from BIOGEN S.R.L. ITALIA, ROCHE and NOVARTIS outside the submitted work. Dr De Sanctis is affiliated with an institution that receives funds for a SMA disease registry (ISMAR); Maria C Pera reports personal fees from ROCHE outside the submitted work. Dr Pera is affiliated with an institution that receives funds for a SMA disease registry (ISMAR); Jacqueline Montes reports personal fees from BIOGEN S.R.L. and ROCHE, outside the submitted work. Dr Montes is affiliated with an institution that receives funds for a SMA disease registry (ISMAR); Amy Pasternak reports grants from SMA FOUNDATION, during the conduct of the study. Dr Pasternak is affiliated with an institution that receives funds for a SMA disease registry (ISMAR); Allan M Glanzman received travel/lodging and compensation from Biogen to serve on an advisory board, received licensing fees from Children's Hospital of Philadelphia for the CHOP-INTEND motor scale, institutional support from NOVARTIS, Biogen and Roche for trial training and/or outcome measure review, and personal compensation from ATOM International (Mallinckrodt Pharmaceuticals, Catabasis Pharmaceuticals, ReveraGen Biopharma) for trial training; Aspa Theraputics for outcomes consulting; and Audentes Therapeutics for outcome review. Dr Glanman is affiliated with an institution that receives funds for a SMA disease registry (ISMAR); Sally Dunaway Young reports grants from Stanford Univesity and Columbia University, during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Biogen, Roche/Genentech, Scholar Rock, Cure SMA, grants from SMA Foundation, outside the submitted work. Dr Dunaway Young is affiliated with an institution that receives funds for a SMA disease registry (ISMAR); Marika Pane reports personal fees from BIOGEN S.R.L., PTC, NOVARTIS, SAREPTA, outside the submitted work. Dr Pane is affiliated with an institution that receives funds for a SMA disease registry (ISMAR); Mariacristina Scoto was CO-PI for SMA REACH UK, during the conduct of the study; received personal fees from ROCHE as PI (jewelfish) and member of advisory board, outside the submitted work. Dr Scoto is affiliated with an institution that receives funds for a SMA disease registry (ISMAR); Sonia Messina reports personal fees from BIOGEN S.R.L., NOVARTIS, PTC THERAPEUTICS, SANTHERA, outside the submitted work. Dr Messina is affiliated with an institution that receives funds for a SMA disease registry (ISMAR); Adele D'Amico reports personal fees from BIOGEN S.R.L., SAREPTA, NOVARTIS, outside the submitted work. Dr D'Amico is affiliated with an institution that receives funds for a SMA disease registry (ISMAR); Emilio Albamonte reports personal fees from BIOGEN S.R.L. outside the submitted work. Dr Albamonte is affiliated with an institution that receives funds for a SMA disease registry (ISMAR); Francesca Bovis reports personal fees from BIOGEN outside the submitted work. Basil T Darras reports personal fees from Biogen, NOVARTIS, Roche, Pfizer, Sarepta, PTC, outside the submitted work. Dr Darras is affiliated with an institution that receives funds for a SMA disease registry (ISMAR); Enrico Bertini reports personal fees from BIOGEN S.R.L., NOVARTIS, ROCHE, outside the submitted work. Dr Bertini is affiliated with an institution that receives funds for a SMA disease registry (ISMAR); Dr Bertini was supported by the Italian Ministry of Health with Current Research funds, Ministry of Health and by Ricerca Finalizzata RF-2019-12370334. Valeria A Sansone reports personal fees from BIOGEN S.R.L, NOVARTIS, SANTHERA, SAREPTA, PTC, outside the submitted work. Dr Sansone is affiliated with an institution that receives funds for a SMA disease registry (ISMAR); John Day reports personal fees from NOVARTIS, ROCHE, BIOGEN S.R.L., Novartis, outside the submitted work. Dr Day is affiliated with an institution that receives funds for a SMA disease registry (ISMAR); Francesco Muntoni reports grants from Biogen, grants from Biogen, personal fees from Biogen, grants from NOVARTIS, personal fees from NOVARTIS, personal fees from Roche, during the conduct of the study; personal fees from Pfizer, grants from Sarepta, personal fees from Sarepta, personal fees from PTC, outside the submitted work. Dr Muntoni is affiliated with an institution that receives funds for a SMA disease registry (ISMAR); Dr Muntoni institutions receive registry funding (SMA REACH UK) from Biogen, Roche and Novartis; he also declares compensation for educational activities and advisory boards with Roche and Novartis; Darryl C. De Vivo reports personal fees from NOVARTIS, ROCHE, BIOGEN S.R.L., Cytokinetics Pharmaceuticals, outside the submitted work. Dr De Vivo is affiliated with an institution that receives funds for a SMA disease registry (ISMAR); Giovanni Baranello reports personal fees from NOVARTIS, ROCHE, BIOGEN S.R.L., Novartis, outside the submitted work. Dr Baranello is affiliated with an institution that receives funds for a SMA disease registry (ISMAR); Richard Finkel reports personal fees from NOVARTIS, ROCHE, BIOGEN S.R.L., Novartis, outside the submitted work. Dr Finkel is affiliated with an institution that receives funds for a SMA disease registry (ISMAR); Eugenio Mercuri reports personal fees from NOVARTIS, ROCHE, BIOGEN S.R.L., PTC THERAPEUTICS, SAREPTA, SANTHERA, SCHOLAR ROCK, outside the submitted work. Dr Mercuri is affiliated with an institution that receives funds for a SMA disease registry (ISMAR); Annemarie Rohwer, Irene Mizzoni, Simone Morando, Evelin Milev, Michela Catteruccia, Noemi Brolatti, Francesca Salmin, Matthew Civitello, Maria Sframeli, Zarazuela Zolkipli-Cunningham, Michio Hirano, Tina Duong, are affiliated with an institution that receives funding from BIOGEN, ROCHE and NOVARTIS for a SMA disease registry (ISMAR),, (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

Objective: We describe outcomes following onasemnogene abeparvovec monotherapy for patients with ≥four survival motor neuron 2 (SMN2) gene copies in RESTORE, a noninterventional spinal muscular atrophy patient registry., Methods: We evaluated baseline characteristics, motor milestone achievement, post-treatment motor function, use of ventilatory/nutritional support, and adverse events as of December 22, 2022., Results: At data cutoff, 19 patients in RESTORE had ≥four SMN2 copies and were treated with onasemnogene abeparvovec monotherapy (n=12 [63.2%] four copies; n=7 [36.8%] >four copies). All patients were identified by newborn screening and were reported as asymptomatic at diagnosis. Median age at onasemnogene abeparvovec administration was 3.0 months. Median time from treatment to last recorded visit was 15.4 months, with a range of post-treatment follow-up of 0.03-39.4 months. All 12 children who were assessed for motor development achieved new milestones, including standing alone (n=2) and walking alone (n=5). Five children reported one or more treatment-emergent adverse events (one Grade 3 or greater). No deaths or use of ventilatory/nutritional support were reported., Conclusions: Real-world findings from the RESTORE registry indicate that patients with ≥four SMN2 gene copies treated with onasemnogene abeparvovec monotherapy demonstrated improvements in motor function. Adverse events experienced by these patients were consistent with previously reported findings., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest EFT received personal compensation for consultancy from Novartis Gene Therapies, Inc., Biogen, Biologiz, Cytokinetics, Novartis, and Roche, and research funding from Biogen/Ionis and Roche. SQ-R has participated in clinical trials sponsored by Roche, Novartis and Biogen, and has received speaker and/or consulting fees from Biogen, Novartis Gene Therapies, Inc. (AveXis), Sanofi, UCB, and Roche. She has received research support from the European Commission, INSERM-Health Ministry, and the Association Française des Myopathies (AFM). She is the scientific coordinator of the Registre SMA FRANCE for the French neuromuscular network (FILNEMUS) (http://filnemus.fr) and coordinator of the Garches-Necker-Creteil Health Care Provider for the European Reference Network for Rare Neuromuscular Diseases (ERN EURO-NMD). LS has received personal compensation from Novartis Gene Therapies, Inc., Biogen, Inc., Cytokinetics, Scholar Rock, Biohaven, Akros Pharma, Roche, and Illumina, and research funding from Novartis Gene Therapies, Inc., Biogen, Dynacure, and Roche. JAP has received clinical trial funding from AveXis/Novartis, Biogen, PTC Therapeutics, Sarepta Therapeutics, Biohaven, Genentech, and Scholar Rock, and served as advisor/consultant for AveXis, Biogen, Genentech, and Scholar Rock. SA is a site principal investigator for clinical trials of Biogen, Novartis Gene Therapies, Inc., and Roche; has participated on advisory boards for Novartis Gene Therapies, Inc./Novartis, and Roche; received speaker's fees from Biogen, Novartis, and Roche; and received a research grant from Novartis Gene Therapies, Inc. AL has served on advisory boards for AveXis and Biogen and received research funding from Novartis and Genentech. RSF has received personal compensation for advisory board/data safety monitoring board participation from Novartis Gene Therapies, Inc., Biogen, Catabasis, Ionis, ReveraGen, Roche/Genentech, and Scholar Rock; editorial fees from Elsevier for co-editing a neurology textbook; license fees from the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia; and research funding from Novartis Gene Therapies, Inc., Biogen, Catabasis, ReveraGen, Roche/Genentech, and Scholar Rock., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Dominant missense mutations of the calcium-permeable cation channel TRPV4 cause Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT) type 2C and two forms of distal spinal muscular atrophy. These conditions are collectively referred to as TRPV4-related neuromuscular disease and share features of motor greater than sensory dysfunction and frequent vocal fold weakness. Pathogenic variants lead to gain of ion channel function that can be rescued by TRPV4 antagonists in cellular and animal models. As small molecule TRPV4 antagonists have proven safe in trials for other disease indications, channel inhibition is a promising therapeutic strategy for TRPV4 patients. However, the current knowledge of the clinical features and natural history of TRPV4-related neuromuscular disease is insufficient to enable rational clinical trial design. To address these issues, we developed a TRPV4 patient database and administered a TRPV4-specific patient questionnaire. Here, we report demographic and clinical information, including CMT examination scores (CMTES), from 68 patients with known pathogenic TRPV4 variants, 40 of whom also completed the TRPV4 patient questionnaire. TRPV4 patients showed a bimodal age of onset, with the largest peak occurring in the first 2 years of life. Compared to CMT1A patients, TRPV4 patients showed distinct symptoms and signs, manifesting more ambulatory difficulties and more frequent involvement of proximal arm and leg muscles. Although patients reported fewer sensory symptoms, sensory dysfunction was often detected clinically. Many patients were affected by vocal fold weakness (55%) and shortness of breath (55%), and 11% required ventilatory support. Skeletal abnormalities were common, including scoliosis (64%), arthrogryposis (33%), and foot deformities. Strikingly, patients with infantile onset of disease showed less sensory involvement and less progression of symptoms. These results highlight distinctive clinical features in TRPV4 patients, including motor-predominant disease, proximal arm and leg weakness, severe ambulatory difficulties, vocal fold weakness, respiratory dysfunction, and skeletal involvement. In addition, patients with infantile onset of disease appeared to have a distinct phenotype with less apparent disease progression based on CMTES. These collective observations indicate that clinical trial design for TRPV4-related neuromuscular disease should include outcome measures that reliably capture non-length dependent motor dysfunction, vocal fold weakness, and respiratory disease., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background and Objectives: Nusinersen has shown significant functional motor benefit in the milder types of spinal muscular atrophy (SMA). Less is known on the respiratory outcomes in patients with nusinersen-treated SMA. The aim of this study was to describe changes in respiratory function in pediatric patients with SMA type 2 and 3 on regular treatment with nusinersen within the iSMAc international cohort and to compare their trajectory with the natural history (NH) data published by the consortium in 2020., Methods: This is a 5-year retrospective observational study of pediatric SMA type 2 and nonambulant type 3 (age ≤18 years) treated with nusinersen. The primary objective was to compare the slopes of decline in forced vital capacity % predicted (FVC% pred.), FVC, and age when FVC dropped below 60% between the treated patients and a control group from the natural history cohort. Data on peak cough flow and the use of noninvasive ventilation (NIV) and cough assist were collected., Results: Data were available for 69 treated patients, 53 were SMA type 2 and 16 type 3. The mean (SD) age at first injection was 8.5 (3.2) and 9.7 (3.7) years, respectively. The median (interquartile range) treatment duration was 1 (0.7; 1.9) and 1.2 (0.9; 1.9) years, respectively. At the time of the first nusinersen injection, 24 of 52 (46%) patients with SMA type 2 and 2 of 16 (13%) patients with SMA type 3 were on NIV. Forty-three of 53 (81%) and 4 of 16 (25%) patients used cough device. FVC% pred. in treated patients with SMA type 2 declined annually by 2.3% vs 3.9% in NH ( p = 0.08) and in treated patients with type 3 by 2.6% vs 3.4% NH ( p = 0.59). Patients treated reached FVC <60% later than untreated (12.1 vs 10 years, p = 0.05). A higher percentage of treated vs untreated patients maintained FVC% pred. equal/above their baseline after 12 (65% vs 36%) and 24 (50% vs 24%) months, respectively. NIV use among treated did not significantly change throughout 1-year follow-up., Discussion: This study included the largest real-world cohort of pediatric patients with milder SMA types. The results suggest a positive role of nusinersen in delaying the respiratory decline in patients treated longer than 1 year when compared with natural history. Larger cohorts and longer observation are planned., Classification of Evidence: This study provided Class III evidence that nusinersen slows progression for patients with SMA types 2 and 3 compared with a natural history cohort., Competing Interests: F. Trucco reports participation to Scientific Advisory Boards for Roche UK and teaching initiatives for Biogen, Avexis, Roche, and BREAS. D. Ridout, I. Hughes, Z. Zolkipli-Cunningham, and M. Main report no disclosures. M. Scoto reports participation in Scientific Advisory Boards and teaching initiatives for Avexis, Biogen, and Roche. She is involved as an investigator in clinical trials from Avexis, Biogen, and Roche. In addition, she is the co-principal investigator of the SMA REACH UK clinical network, partially funded by Biogen and Roche. F. Muntoni reports participation in Scientific Advisory Boards and teaching initiatives for Biogen, Roche, and Novartis. He is member of the Rare Disease Scientific Advisory Board for Pfizer. He is involved as an investigator in clinical trials from Novartis, Biogen, and Roche. In addition, he is the principal investigator of the SMA REACH UK clinical network, partially funded by Biogen and Roche. E. Mercuri reports participation in Scientific Advisory Boards and teaching initiatives for Biogen, Roche, Scholar Rock, and Novartis. He is involved as an investigator in clinical trials from Novartis, Biogen, Scholar Rock, and Roche. In addition, he is the principal investigator of the Italian registry participating in iSMAc, partially funded by Biogen, Roche, and Novartis. R. Finkel reports participation in Medical and Scientific Advisory Boards on SMA topics with Novartis, Biogen, Ionis, Roche, Cure SMA, SMA Europe, SMA REACH UK, SMA Foundation, and MDA. Finkel participates as an investigator in SMA-related clinical trials sponsored or supported by Novartis, Biogen, Ionis, Roche, and Scholar Rock. Dr. D. De Vivo reports participation as a consultant in Medical and Scientific Advisory Boards and as an investigator with Novartis, Biogen, Ionis, Roche, PTC, Santhera, Scholar Rock, Sanofi, GliaPharm, Fulcrum Therapeutics, Sarepta, NS Pharma, SMA Foundation, Cure SMA, DoD, NIH, Glut1 Deficiency Foundation, and Hope for Children Research Foundation. B. Darras has served as an ad hoc Scientific Advisory Board member for Novartis, Biogen, Cytokinetics, Vertex, Genentech, Roche, and Sarepta; Steering Committee chair for Roche; and Data Safety Monitoring Board member for Amicus Inc. He has no financial interests in these companies. He has received research support from the NIH/National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, the Slaney Family Fund for SMA, the Spinal Muscular Atrophy Foundation, CureSMA, and Working on Walking Fund and has received grants from Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc, for the ENDEAR, CHERISH, CS2/CS12 studies; from Biogen for CS11; and from Cytokinetics, Sarepta Pharmaceuticals, PTC Therapeutics, Fibrogen, and Summit. O. Mayer reports participation in Advisory Boards for Roche, Biogen, and PTC Therapeutics. He is participating in SMA REACH and iSMAC, partially funded by Biogen. C. Bruno reports participation in Scientific Advisory Boards on SMA topics with Novartis, Biogen, and Roche and participates as a principal investigator in SMA-related clinical trials sponsored by Novartis, Biogen, Ionis, and Roche. S. Messina reports participation in Scientific Advisory Boards and teaching initiatives for Novartis, Biogen, and Roche. She is involved as an investigator in clinical trials from Novartis, Biogen, Scholar Rock, and Roche. M. Pane reports participation in Scientific Advisory Boards and teaching initiatives for Novartis and Biogen. V.A. Sansone provides intellectual support in Advisory Boards and teaching activities for Biogen, Santhera, Sarepta, PTC, Dyne, Triplet, and Novartis. A. D'Amico reports participation in Scientific Advisory Board for Novartis, Roche, and Novartis and teaching initiatives for Biogen. She is also involved as an investigator in clinical trials from Novartis, Biogen, and Roche. In addition, she is an investigator of the Italian registry participating in iSMAc, partially funded by Biogen. E.S. Bertini reports participation in Scientific Advisory Boards for Novartis, Roche, Novartis, and PTC and teaching initiatives for Biogen. He is also involved as an investigator in clinical trials from Novartis, Biogen, Roche, and Novartis. In addition, he is an investigator of the Italian registry participating in iSMAc, partially funded by Biogen. C. Marini-Bettolo reports participation in Scientific Advisory Boards and teaching initiatives for Novartis, Biogen, and Roche. She is involved as an investigator in clinical trials from Novartis. In addition, she is principal investigator for the UK SMA patient registry funded by SMA UK. A. Childs reports participation in Advisory Boards for Novartis, Roche, Biogen, Santhera, and PTC Therapeutics. She is principal investigator for clinical trials supported by Sarepta, Santhera, and PTC Therapeutics. She is participating in SMA REACH and iSMAC, partially funded by Biogen. M. Ong reports participation in Advisory Boards or received consultation fees for Novartis, Roche, Biogen, and CSL Behring. She is participating in SMA REACH and iSMAC, partially funded by Biogen. Dr. A. Mayhew reports participation in Scientific Advisory Boards and teaching initiatives for Biogen and Roche. She is involved as an evaluator at site and acts as an independent consultant to train evaluators in clinical trials from Novartis, Biogen, and Roche. In addition, she is the principal investigator at Newcastle for the SMA REACH UK clinical network, partially funded by Biogen and by SMA UK. J. Montes reports participation as a consultant and on Scientific Advisory Boards for Biogen, Ionis, Roche, and Scholar Rock. G. Coratti reports consultant activities for Novartis, Biogen, Roche, Biologix, and Genesis Pharma. She is involved as a clinical evaluator in clinical trials from Novartis, Biogen, Scholar Rock, and Roche. R. De Sanctis reports consultant activities for Biogen and Roche. He is involved as a clinical evaluator in clinical trials from Novartis, Biogen, Scholar Rock, and Roche. L. Servais reports consultancy/board attendance/lectures for Novartis, Biogen, Roche, Scholar Rock, and BioHaven. A. Majumdar reports participation in Advisory Boards for Novartis, Roche, Biogen, Santhera, and PTC Therapeutics. He is principal investigator for clinical trials supported by Wave Therapeutics. He is participating in SMA REACH and iSMAC, partially funded by Biogen. D. Parasuraman reports participation in Advisory Boards for Roche, Biogen, Sarepta and has had support from PTC Therapeutics. He is principal investigator for clinical trials supported by Roche. He is participating in SMA REACH and iSMAC, partially funded by Biogen. V. Gowda reports participation in Advisory Boards or received consultation fees for Novartis, Roche, Biogen, PTC therapeutics, Wave Life Sciences, Pfizer, and Sarepta Therapeutics. She is participating in SMA REACH and iSMAC, partially funded by Biogen. FT, CB, EB, AD, EM, and MP are members of the ERN NMD (European Reference Networks). Full disclosure form information provided by the authors is available with the full text of this article at Neurology.org/cp., (© 2024 American Academy of Neurology.)

Background: The natural history of spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is well understood, with progressive muscle weakness resulting in declines in function. The development of contractures is common and negatively impacts function. Clinically, joint hypermobility (JH) is observed but is poorly described, and its relationship with function is unknown. Methods : Lower-limb ROM (range of motion) assessments of extension and flexion at the hip, knee, and ankle were performed. ROMs exceeding the published norms were included in the analysis. The functional assessments performed included the six-minute walk test (6 MWT) and the Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale-Expanded (HFMSE). Results: Of the 143 participants, 86% ( n = 123) had at least one ROM measure that was hypermobile, and 22% ( n = 32) had three or more. The HFMSE scores were inversely correlated with hip extension JH (r = -0.60, p = 0.21; n = 6) and positively correlated with knee flexion JH (r = 0.24, p = 0.02, n = 89). There was a moderate, inverse relationship between the 6 MWT distance and ankle plantar flexion JH (r = -0.73, p = 0.002; n = 15). Conclusions: JH was identified in nearly all participants in at least one joint in this study. Hip extension, knee flexion and ankle plantar flexion JH was associated with function. A further understanding of the trajectory of lower-limb joint ROM is needed to improve future rehabilitation strategies.

Background and Objectives: Vamorolone is a dissociative agonist of the glucocorticoid receptor that has shown similar efficacy and reduced safety concerns in comparison with prednisone in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). This study was conducted to determine the efficacy and safety of vamorolone over 48 weeks and to study crossover participants (prednisone to vamorolone; placebo to vamorolone)., Methods: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled and prednisone-controlled clinical trial of 2 doses of vamorolone was conducted in participants with DMD, in the ages from 4 years to younger than 7 years at baseline. The interventions were 2 mg/kg/d of vamorolone and 6 mg/kg/d of vamorolone for 48 weeks (period 1: 24 weeks + period 2: 24 weeks) and 0.75 mg/kg/d of prednisone and placebo for the first 24 weeks (before crossover). Efficacy was evaluated through gross motor outcomes and safety through adverse events, growth velocity, body mass index (BMI), and bone turnover biomarkers. This analysis focused on period 2., Results: A total of 121 participants with DMD were randomized. Vamorolone at a dose of 6 mg/kg/d showed maintenance of improvement for all motor outcomes to week 48 (e.g., for primary outcome, time to stand from supine [TTSTAND] velocity, week 24 least squares mean [LSM] [SE] 0.052 [0.0130] rises/s vs week 48 LSM [SE] 0.0446 [0.0138]). After 48 weeks, vamorolone at a dose of 2 mg/kg/d showed similar improvements as 6 mg/kg/d for North Star Ambulatory Assessment (NSAA) (vamorolone 6 mg/kg/d-vamorolone 2 mg/kg/d LSM [SE] 0.49 [1.14]; 95% CI -1.80 to 2.78, p = 0.67), but less improvement for other motor outcomes. The placebo to vamorolone 6 mg/kg/d group showed rapid improvements after 20 weeks of treatment approaching benefit seen with 48-week 6 mg/kg/d of vamorolone treatment for TTSTAND, time to run/walk 10 m, and NSAA. There was significant improvement in linear growth after crossover in the prednisone to vamorolone 6 mg/kg/d group, and rapid reversal of prednisone-induced decline in bone turnover biomarkers in both crossover groups. There was an increase in BMI after 24 weeks of treatment that then stabilized for both vamorolone groups., Discussion: Improvements of motor outcomes seen with 6 mg/kg/d of vamorolone at 24 weeks of treatment were maintained to 48 weeks of treatment. Vamorolone at a dose of 6 mg/kg/d showed better maintenance of effect compared with vamorolone at a dose of 2 mg/kg/d for most (3/5) motor outcomes. Bone morbidities of prednisone (stunting of growth and declines in serum bone biomarkers) were reversed when treatment transitioned to vamorolone., Trial Registration Information: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03439670., Classification of Evidence: This study provides Class I evidence that for boys with DMD, the efficacy of vamorolone at a dose of 6 mg/kg/d was maintained over 48 weeks.

Background: Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a neuromuscular disorder characterised by progressive motor function decline. Motor function is assessed using several functional outcome measures including the Revised Hammersmith Scale (RHS)., Objective: In this study, we present longitudinal trajectories for the RHS in an international cohort of 149 untreated paediatric SMA 2 and 3 patients (across 531 assessments collected between March 2015 and July 2019)., Methods: We contextualise these trajectories using both the Hammersmith Functional Motor Scale Expanded (HFMSE) and Revised Upper Limb Module (RULM). At baseline, this cohort included 50% females and 15% of patients had undergone spinal fusion surgery. Patient trajectories were modelled using a natural cubic spline with age, sex, and random effects for each patient., Results: RHS and HFMSE scores show similar trends over time in this cohort not receiving disease modifying therapies. The results confirm the strong correlation between the RHS and RULM previously observed in SMA types 2 and 3a. Scoliosis surgery is associated with a reduction of 3 points in the RHS, 4.5 points in the HFMSE for the SMA 2 population, and a reduction of 11.8 points in the RHS, and 13.4 points in the HFMSE for the SMA 3a populations. When comparing the RHS and RULM, there is a lower correlation in the type 3a's than the type 2 patients. In the SMA 2 population, there is no significant difference between the sexes in either the RHS or HFMSE trajectories. There is no significant difference in the RULM trajectory in the SMA 2 or 3a participants by sex., Conclusions: This study demonstrates that the RHS could be used in conjunction with other functional measures such as the RULM to holistically detect SMA disease progression. This will assist with fully understanding changes that occur with treatments, further defining trajectories and therapy outcomes.

Background: Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) and related dystrophinopathies are neuromuscular conditions with great unmet medical needs that require the development of effective medical treatments., Objective: To aid sponsors in clinical development of drugs and therapeutic biological products for treating DMD across the disease spectrum by integrating advancements, patient registries, natural history studies, and more into a comprehensive guidance., Methods: This guidance emerged from collaboration between the FDA, the Duchenne community, and industry stakeholders. It entailed a structured approach, involving multiple committees and boards. From its inception in 2014, the guidance underwent revisions incorporating insights from gene therapy studies, cardiac function research, and innovative clinical trial designs., Results: The guidance provides a deeper understanding of DMD and its variants, focusing on patient engagement, diagnostic criteria, natural history, biomarkers, and clinical trials. It underscores patient-focused drug development, the significance of dystrophin as a biomarker, and the pivotal role of magnetic resonance imaging in assessing disease progression. Additionally, the guidance addresses cardiomyopathy's prominence in DMD and the burgeoning field of gene therapy., Conclusions: The updated guidance offers a comprehensive understanding of DMD, emphasizing patient-centric approaches, innovative trial designs, and the importance of biomarkers. The focus on cardiomyopathy and gene therapy signifies the evolving realm of DMD research. It acts as a crucial roadmap for sponsors, potentially leading to improved treatments for DMD.

Background: The CHOP-INTEND is an established outcome measure used to assess motor function in young and weak SMA patients previously validated in type I infants older than 3 months., Objective: The aim of our study was to assess the maturation of the CHOP-INTEND scores in a group of healthy infants, establishing which items of the scale can be reliably used in individuals younger than 3 months., Methods: This is a prospective observational study. The whole cohort was divided into 5 age groups. Each of the 16 CHOP-INTEND items was analyzed looking at the frequency distribution of the scores in each age subgroup. An item was considered developmentally appropriate when > 85% of the infants achieved a full score., Results: our study includes 61 assessments collected < 2 weeks, 25 at 2-4 weeks, 20 at 5-8 weeks, 25 at 9-12 weeks and 20 at 13-17 weeks. Eight of the 16 items were developmentally appropriate already in the first week and another by the end of the first month. The remaining 7 items had more variable responses in the first three months and full scores were consistently achieved only after the third month., Conclusions: Our findings suggest that the CHOP-INTEND can be used before the age of 3 months, but the results should be interpreted with caution, considering which items are developmentally appropriate at the time of testing. This will also help to establish whether the changes observed following early treatments are a sign of efficacy or at least partly reflect maturational aspects.

Background: Long-term, real-world effectiveness and safety data of disease-modifying treatments for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) are important for assessing outcomes and providing information for a larger number and broader range of SMA patients than included in clinical trials., Objective: We sought to describe patients with SMA treated with onasemnogene abeparvovec monotherapy in the real-world setting., Methods: RESTORE is a prospective, multicenter, multinational, observational registry that captures data from a variety of sources., Results: Recruitment started in September 2018. As of May 23, 2022, data were available for 168 patients treated with onasemnogene abeparvovec monotherapy. Median (IQR) age at initial SMA diagnosis was 1 (0-6) month and at onasemnogene abeparvovec infusion was 3 (1-10) months. Eighty patients (47.6%) had two and 70 (41.7%) had three copies of SMN2, and 98 (58.3%) were identified by newborn screening. Infants identified by newborn screening had a lower age at final assessment (mean age 11.5 months) and greater mean final (SD) CHOP INTEND score (57.0 [10.0] points) compared with clinically diagnosed patients (23.1 months; 52.1 [8.0] points). All patients maintained/achieved motor milestones. 48.5% (n = 81/167) experienced at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (AE), and 31/167 patients (18.6%) experienced at least one serious AE, of which 8/31 were considered treatment-related., Conclusion: These real-world outcomes support findings from the interventional trial program and demonstrate effectiveness of onasemnogene abeparvovec over a large patient population, which was consistent with initial clinical data and published 5-year follow-up data. Observed AEs were consistent with the established safety profile of onasemnogene abeparvovec.

We sought to devise a rational, systematic approach for defining/grouping survival motor neuron-targeted disease-modifying treatment (DMT) scenarios. The proposed classification is primarily based on a two-part differentiation: initial DMT, and persistence/discontinuation of subsequent DMT(s). Treatment categories were identified: monotherapy add-on, transient add-on, combination with onasemnogene abeparvovec, bridging to onasemnogene abeparvovec, and switching to onasemnogene abeparvovec. We validated this approach by applying the classification to the 443 patients currently in the RESTORE registry and explored the demographics of these different groups of patients. This work forms the basis to explore the safety and efficacy profile of the different combinations of DMT in SMA., (© 2023 The Authors. Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Neurological Association.)

Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT) due to GJB1 variants (CMTX1) is the second most common form of CMT. It is an X-linked disorder characterized by progressive sensory and motor neuropathy with males affected more severely than females. Many reported GJB1 variants remain classified as variants of uncertain significance (VUS). In this large, international, multicentre study we prospectively collected demographic, clinical and genetic data on patients with CMT associated with GJB1 variants. Pathogenicity for each variant was defined using adapted American College of Medical Genetics criteria. Baseline and longitudinal analyses were conducted to study genotype-phenotype correlations, to calculate longitudinal change using the CMT Examination Score (CMTES), to compare males versus females, and pathogenic/likely pathogenic (P/LP) variants versus VUS. We present 387 patients from 295 families harbouring 154 variants in GJB1. Of these, 319 patients (82.4%) were deemed to have P/LP variants, 65 had VUS (16.8%) and three benign variants (0.8%; excluded from analysis); an increased proportion of patients with P/LP variants compared with using ClinVar's classification (74.6%). Male patients (166/319, 52.0%, P/LP only) were more severely affected at baseline. Baseline measures in patients with P/LP variants and VUS showed no significant differences, and regression analysis suggested the disease groups were near identical at baseline. Genotype-phenotype analysis suggested c.-17G>A produces the most severe phenotype of the five most common variants, and missense variants in the intracellular domain are less severe than other domains. Progression of disease was seen with increasing CMTES over time up to 8 years follow-up. Standard response mean (SRM), a measure of outcome responsiveness, peaked at 3 years with moderate responsiveness [change in CMTES (ΔCMTES) = 1.3 ± 2.6, P = 0.00016, SRM = 0.50]. Males and females progressed similarly up to 8 years, but baseline regression analysis suggested that over a longer period, females progress more slowly. Progression was most pronounced for mild phenotypes (CMTES = 0-7; 3-year ΔCMTES = 2.3 ± 2.5, P = 0.001, SRM = 0.90). Enhanced variant interpretation has yielded an increased proportion of GJB1 variants classified as P/LP and will aid future variant interpretation in this gene. Baseline and longitudinal analysis of this large cohort of CMTX1 patients describes the natural history of the disease including the rate of progression; CMTES showed moderate responsiveness for the whole group at 3 years and higher responsiveness for the mild group at 3, 4 and 5 years. These results have implications for patient selection for upcoming clinical trials., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain.)

Recessive SH3TC2 variants cause Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease type 4C (CMT4C). CMT4C is typically a sensorimotor demyelinating polyneuropathy, marked by early onset spinal deformities, but its clinical characteristics and severity are quite variable. Clear relationships between pathogenic variants and the spectrum of disease manifestations are to date lacking. Gene replacement therapy has been shown to ameliorate the phenotype in a mouse model of CMT4C, emphasizing the need for natural history studies to inform clinical trial readiness. Data, including both genetic information and clinical characteristics, were compiled from the longitudinal, prospective dataset of the Inherited Neuropathy Consortium, a member of the Rare Diseases Clinical Research Network (INC-RDCRN). The Charcot Marie Tooth Neuropathy Score (CMTNS), Examination Score (CMTES) and the Rasch-weighted CMTES (CMTES-R) were used to describe symptoms, neurological examinations and neurophysiological characteristics. Standardized response means were calculated at yearly intervals and a mixed model for repeated measures was used to estimate the change in CMTES and CMTES-R over time. Fifty-six individuals (59% female), median age 27 years (range 2-67 years) with homozygous or compound heterozygous variants in SH3TC2 were identified, including 34 unique variants, 14 of which have not previously been published. Twenty-eight participants had longitudinal data available. While there was no significant difference in the CMTES in those with protein truncating versus non-protein truncating variants, there were significant differences in the mean ulnar nerve compound muscle action potential amplitude, the mean radial sensory nerve action potential amplitude, and in the prevalence of scoliosis, suggesting the possibility of a milder phenotype in individuals with one or two non-protein-truncating variants. Overall, the mean value of the CMTES was 13, reflecting moderate clinical severity. There was a high rate of scoliosis (81%), scoliosis surgery (36%), and walking difficulty (94%) among study participants. The CMTES and CMTES-R appeared moderately responsive to change over extended follow-up, demonstrating a standardized response mean of 0.81 standard deviation units or 0.71 standard deviation units, respectively, over 3 years. Our analysis represents the largest cross-sectional and only longitudinal study to date, of the clinical phenotype of both adults and children with CMT4C. With the promise of upcoming genetic treatments, these data will further define the natural history of the disease and inform study design in preparation for clinical trials., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Guarantors of Brain. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background and Objectives: The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of body mass index (BMI) on disease progression over 2 years in children with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease (CMT)., Methods: BMI was classified in 242 participants aged 3-20 years with CMT enrolled in the Inherited Neuropathy Consortium, using the International Obesity Task Force (based on adult BMI values, kg/m 2 ) criteria. Groups were categorized as severely underweight (BMI <17 kg/m 2 ), underweight (BMI ≥17 to <18.5 kg/m 2 ), healthy weight (BMI ≥18.5 to <25 kg/m 2 ), overweight (BMI ≥25 to <30 kg/m 2 ), and obese (BMI ≥30 kg/m 2 ). Disease severity was assessed using the CMT Pediatric Scale (CMTPedS), a clinical outcome assessment of disability (0-44 points, mild to severe)., Results: At baseline, compared with individuals being of a healthy weight (mean CMTPedS 15.48, SD 9.22), children who were severely underweight (mean CMTPedS difference 9.03, 95% CI 0.94-17.12; p = 0.02), underweight (mean CMTPedS difference 5.97, 95% CI 0.62-11.31; p = 0.02), or obese (mean CMTPedS difference 7.96, 95% CI 1.03-14.88; p = 0.015) exhibited greater disability. At 2 years, compared with individuals being of a healthy weight (mean CMTPedS 17.53, SD 9.41), children who were severely underweight exhibited greater disability (mean CMTPedS difference 9.27, 95% CI 0.90-17.64; p = 0.02). Over the 2-year periods, the mean CMTPedS for the whole sample deteriorated by 1.72 points (95% CI 1.09-2.38; p < 0.001), with severely underweight children progressing at the fastest rate (mean CMTPedS change of 2.3, 95% CI 1.53-6.13; p = 0.21). In children who did not have a change in BMI categories over 2 years (69% of sample), CMTPedS scores deteriorated faster in those who were severely underweight (mean CMTPedS change 6.40 points, 95% CI 2.42-10.38; p = 0.01) than those of healthy weight (mean CMTPedS change 1.79 points, 95% CI 0.93-2.69; p < 0.001). For children who changed BMI categories (31% of sample), CMTPedS scores deteriorated faster in children who became overweight/obese (mean CMTPedS change 2.76 points, 95% CI 0.11-5.41; p = 0.031)., Discussion: Children with CMT who were severely underweight, underweight, or obese exhibited greater disability at baseline. Over the 2-year period in those whose BMI remained stable, severely underweight children deteriorated at the fastest rate. For children who changed BMI categories over the 2 years, CMTPedS scores deteriorated faster in children who became overweight/obese. Interventions that maintain or improve BMI toward healthy weight may reduce disability in children with CMT., (© 2023 American Academy of Neurology.)