Search

Salvatore Sardo,1 Giustino Varrassi,2 Mario Scartozzi,3 Maria Caterina Pace,4 Vittorio Schweiger,5 Stefano Tamburin,6 Mario Musu,1 Gabriele Finco1 1Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, Monserrato, Italy; 2Paolo Procacci Foundation, Rome, Italy; 3Medical Oncology Unit, University Hospital and University of Cagliari, Monserrato, Italy; 4Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, University of Napoli, Napoli, Italy; 5Department of Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy; 6Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, Verona, ItalyCorrespondence: Salvatore Sardo, Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, Monserrato, Italy, Email salvatore.sardo@unica.itIntroduction: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity (CIPN) affects nearly 70% of cancer patients after chemotherapy, causing sensory, motor, autonomic dysfunction, and neuropathic pain. The Desirability of Outcome Ranking (DOOR) framework is proposed as a better way to assess preventive or therapeutic interventions for CIPN.Methods: A survey was conducted among Italian healthcare professionals and researchers affiliated to the Italian Chapter of the International Association for the Study of Pain (AISD) to identify the most important outcomes in clinical management and research.Results: Among the 73 respondents, 61 qualified for the survey, with an overall response rate of 1.2%. The vast majority were physicians (77%), most of whom were anesthesiologists (47.5%). The results showed that pain, survival, sensory impairment, motor impairment, and quality of life were consistently ranked as the most important outcomes, but there was significant disagreement in the outcomes relative ranking, making it difficult to develop a DOOR algorithm. The study also revealed that clinicians commonly use structured interviews to evaluate patients with CIPN, and the most prescribed drugs or supplements were palmitoylethanolamide, pregabalin, gabapentin and alpha lipoic acid as preventive agents and pregabalin, palmitoylethanolamide, duloxetine, gabapentin, and amitriptyline as therapeutic agents. However, many of these drugs have not been clinically proven to be effective for CIPN.Discussion: This study suggests that the implementation of a DOOR framework for CIPN using healthcare professionals is more difficult than expected, given the significant disagreement in our respondents’ ranking of outcomes. Our work provides interesting topics for future research in CIPN, but its limitations include a small sample size, a low response rate, and a possible selection bias.Keywords: neuropathic pain, peripheral neuropathy, cancer, taxane, Desirability of Outcome Ranking, survey, chemotherapy induced peripheral neuropathy

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a chronic and progressive degenerative disease that affects joint structures, such as the hips, knees, and hands, involving the articular cartilage, subchondral bone, ligaments, capsule, and synovium. OA is characterized by a progressive degeneration of the joint structures, resulting in pain and decreased quality of life. Local and systemic risk factors pave the way for OA development. Different phenotypes may be identified, but three main molecular mechanisms define the endotypes: the bone-driven endotype, the synovitis-driven endotype, and the cartilage-driven endotype. The hallmark of OA pathophysiology involves more than just mechanical degradation; it includes the release of pro-inflammatory mediators, such as interleukins and TNF-a, which elucidates the significant roles of metabolic syndrome, diabetes, and cellular senescence in its development. OA is distinguished by a clinical presentation that varies significantly between people and is marked by pain, stiffness, and functional impairments. The clinical course can be split into Pre-OA, Early OA, Evident OA, and End-Stage. Depending on the stage of the disease, OA diagnosis frequently necessitates a complex strategy that combines clinical evaluation to detect joint tenderness, range of motion, and joint swelling or abnormalities, medical history assessment, imaging modalities, and laboratory investigations. There is no known treatment for OA, and different therapies are usually evaluated based on the stage of the disease to minimize pain and stiffness while maintaining joint function. Treatments are divided into the reduction of modifiable risk factors, pharmacologic therapies, rehabilitation, complementary therapies, interventional pain procedures, and surgery. OA clinical heterogeneity underlines the importance of prevention, early diagnosis, and identifying the phenotype and endotype to tailor the treatment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Salvatore Sardo,1,2 Maura Galletta,2 Erica Coni,3 Cesar Ivan Aviles Gonzalez,1 Ilenia Piras,4 Giorgio Pia,4 Maurizio Evangelista,5 Mario Musu,1,2 Gabriele Finco1,2 1Anesthesia and Intensive Care Unit, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy; 2Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy; 3RN-BC, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy; 4ATS Sardegna, ASSL Cagliari SS, Cagliari, Italy; 5Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Cattolica University, Rome, ItalyCorrespondence: Maura GallettaDepartment of Medical Sciences and Public Health, University of Cagliari, Highway 554 (exit for Sestu), Monserrato 09042, Cagliari, ItalyTel +39 070-675-3108Email maura.galletta@gmail.comPurpose: The aim of this prospective study was to assess the behavior of emergency department (ED) nurses with regard to pain and their role in pain management in a real-life clinical setting.Methods: A total of 509 consecutive patients were enrolled during a 6-week period. A case-report form was used to collect data on nurses’ approaches to pain, time to analgesia provision, and patient-perceived quality of analgesia.Results: Triage nurses actively inquired about pain in almost every case, but they did not estimate pain intensity in a third of patients. In the majority of cases, triage nurses did not report pain-related findings to the physician, who was the only professional that could prescribe analgesia to patients. The assignment of the color-coding of triage by nurses appears to be related to the perceived severity of the clinical case and a more comprehensive evaluation of pain. More than half of patients were at least fairly satisfied with analgesia.Conclusion: Pain is increasingly screened during triage, but its comprehensive assessment and management still lack systematic application. We believe that further education and implementation of analgesia protocols may empower nurses to manage ED patients’ pain more effectively and in a more timely manner.Keywords: emergency, ED, nurse, oligoanalgesia, pain, triage

Carla Galvani,1 Paola Caramaschi,1 Paolo Mura,2 Antonella Paladini,3 Alba Piroli,3 Elisa Arnaudo,4 Lucia De Franceschi,5 Maurizio Evangelista,6 Alice Pari,4 Giovanna Ongaro,1 Gabriele Finco,2 Anna Ciannameo,4 Antonio Carletto,1 Giustino Varrassi,3,7 Domenico Biasi1 1Rheumatology Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy; 2Anesthesia, Intensive Care and Pain Therapy Unit, Department of Medical Science “M. Aresu”, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy; 3Department of MESVA, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy; 4Department of Internal Medicine, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy; 5Internal Medicine Unit, Department of Medicine, University of Verona, Verona, Italy; 6Emergency Department, Institute of Anesthesia, Resuscitation and Pain Medicine, Catholic University of Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy; 7Paolo Procacci Foundation, Rome, Italy Background: Chronic pain is a key symptom in fibromyalgia (FM), and its management is still challenging for rheumatologists in daily practice. FM patients show psychological and psychiatric manifestations, going from mood and emotional disorders to depression and alexithymia that negatively impact their quality of life, limiting their daily activities. Since pharmacological strategies have a limited efficacy in FM pain, alternative or complementary non-pharmacological approaches have been introduced in the clinical management of FM. Patients and methods: This is a retrospective study on FM patients (n=52) treated with a novel integrated postural counseling (PC) rehabilitation program carried out by a counselor physiotherapist. The clinical impact of PC was evaluated by 1) a semi-structured interview using an ad hoc modified questionnaire McGill Illness Narrative Interview (MINI) 1 to obtain data on pain management by highlighting everyday experience of living with pain and 2) an FM impact questionnaire (FIQ) total score. Results: Two main structures of narrative emplotment of FM illness were recognized: 1) the cumulative life narrative structure (46.15%) and 2) the broken life (53.85%) narrative structure. Baseline FIQ score was 77.38±7.77, and it was significantly reduced after PC to 39.12±13.27 (P

Paolo Mura,1 Elisabetta Serra,1 Franco Marinangeli,2 Sebastiano Patti,3 Mario Musu,1 Ilenia Piras,3 Maria Valeria Massidda,1 Giorgio Pia,3 Maurizio Evangelista,4 Gabriele Finco1 1Department of Medical Sciences “M. Aresu”, University of Cagliari, Cagliari, Italy; 2Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Medicine, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy; 3Department of Emergency Medicine, Santissima Trinità Hospital, Cagliari, Italy; 4Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Cattolica University, Rome, Italy Aim: Pain represents the most frequent cause for patient admission to emergency departments (EDs). Oligoanalgesia is a common problem in this field. The aims of this study were to assess prevalence and intensity of pain in patients who visited a second-level urban ED and to evaluate the efficacy of pharmacological treatment administered subsequent to variations in pain intensity. Methods: A 4-week prospective observational study was carried out on 2,838 patients who visited a second-level urban ED. Pain intensity was evaluated using the Numeric Rating Scale at the moment of triage. The efficacy of prescribed analgesic therapy was evaluated at 30 and 60 minutes, and at discharge. Data concerning pain intensity were classified as absent, slight, mild, or severe. Pain was evaluated in relation to the prescribed therapy. Results: Pain prevalence was 70.7%. Traumatic events were the primary cause in most cases (40.44%), followed by pain linked to urologic problems (13.52%), abdominal pain (13.39%), and nontraumatic musculoskeletal pain (7.10%). Only 32.46% of patients were given pharmacological therapy. Of these, 76% reported severe pain, 19% moderate, and 5% slight, and 66% received nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or paracetamol, 4% opioids, and 30% other therapies. A difference of at least 2 points on the Numerical Rating Scale was observed in 84% of patients on reevaluation following initial analgesic therapy. Conclusion: Pain represents one of the primary reasons for visits to EDs. Although a notable reduction in pain intensity has been highlighted in patients who received painkillers, results show that inadequate treatment of pain in ED continues to be a problem. Keywords: pain, emergency department, oligoanalgesia, pain treatment, pain assessment, NSAIDs, opioids, methoxyflurane, traumatic pain, abdominal pain

Emergency or postoperative pain often represents an authentic challenge in patients who were already on opioid treatment for chronic pain. Thus, their management requires not only the physician’s ability to treat acute pain, but also competence in switching the opioid that lost efficacy. Different aspects should be considered, such as opioids titration, switching, association and equianalgesia. The objective of this paper is to provide a narrative review, which has been elaborated and discussed among clinicians through an iterative process involving development and review of the draft during two web-based meetings and via email. This expert opinion aims to facilitate the correct opioid use through appropriate practices with a focus on pain treatment in emergency and postoperative pain. Equianalgesia tables were reviewed and integrated by clinicians and researchers with expertise in anesthesia, postoperative medicine, intensive care, emergency medicine pharmacology and addiction medicine. Special populations (liver/kidney failure, elder, pediatric, pregnancy/lactation) are discussed in detail along with other critical scenarios, such as: (i) rapid pain worsening in chronic pain (aggravating pain due to disease progression or tolerance development to analgesic therapy); (ii) acute pain on maintenance treatment; and (iii) pain management of complicated patients in emergency care. Extended and updated equianalgesia tables and conversion rates for 17 different opioid formulations (of 9 different molecules) are presented as follows. Opioids remain the class that best suits clinical needs of emergency and post-operative medicine. However, it should be stressed that equianalgesia can be affected by drug-to-drug interactions and pharmacological imprecision, in a complex field where clinical experience may be the main guiding principle. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Since the reports in Wuhan (China), in December 2019, of the first cluster of cases of pneumonia caused by the new Coronavirus called 2019-nCoV or SARS-CoV-2, there has been a pandemic spread of the infection. By now, we have no specific therapy to counteract this emergency. The latest epidemiological data suggest that children are just as likely as adults to get infected by the virus. Most of them show mild clinical pictures or are completely asymptomatic, but there is an increased risk for severe disease in infancy (<12 months of age) and in children with underlying medical conditions. In this article, research achievements on the treatment of pediatric SARS-CoV-2 infection are examined. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]