Search

Abstract: Objective: The objective of the present study was to assess whether patients unable to perform a preoperative maximal stair climbing test had an increased incidence of morbidity and mortality after major lung resection compared to patients who were able to exercise. Methods: Three hundred and ninety one patients submitted to pulmonary lobectomy or pneumonectomy for lung cancer were analyzed. Forty-five of these patients were unable to perform a preoperative maximal stair climbing test for underlying comorbidities. Unadjusted and propensity score case matched comparisons were performed between patients who could and who could not perform a preoperative stair climbing test. Multi-variable analyses were then performed to identify predictors of morbidity and mortality, and were validated by bootstrap bagging. Results: Patients who could not perform the stair climbing test had similar morbidity rates (31.1 vs. 35.6%, respectively, P=0.7), but higher mortality rates (15.6 vs. 4.4%, respectively, P=0.08) and deaths among complicated patients (50 vs. 12.5%, respectively, P=0.025), compared to propensity score matched patients who could perform the stair climbing test. Logistic regression analyses showed that the inability to perform the stair climbing test was an independent and reliable predictor of mortality (P=0.005) but not of morbidity (P=0.2). Conclusions: Patients unable to perform a preoperative maximal exercise test had an increased risk of mortality after major lung resection. Half of these patients did not survive postoperative complications, due to their decreased aerobic reserve caused by physical inactivity which made them unable to cope with the increased oxygen demand. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Objective: To identify predictors of postoperative exercise oxygen desaturation (EOD) in patients submitted to lobectomy or pneumonectomy for lung carcinoma. Patients and methods: A consecutive series of 227 patients with non-small cell lung cancer submitted to lobectomy or pneumonectomy from January 2000 through October 2002 were prospectively analyzed. Maximal stair-climbing tests were performed preoperatively (the day before the operation) and postoperatively (on average, 9.2 days after operation) in room air for all patients. A fall in oxygen saturation during the exercise below 90% was termed ‘desaturation’. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify predictors of postoperative EOD. Results: Thirty-five patients (15.4%) developed postoperative EOD. After multivariate analysis, the only independent predictor of postoperative EOD resulted a reduction in oxygen saturation during the preoperative exercise (P=0.0004). Conclusions: Patients with a reduction in oxygen saturation during the preoperative exercise test are at increased risk to develop a postoperative EOD below 90%. A postoperative exercise test should be performed in all these patients. Should EOD be confirmed, an intermittent home oxygen therapy is recommended in order to facilitate recovery from operation and improve the quality of life. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

Carcinoid tumours are known to occur frequently in the gastrointestinal and respiratory tracts. A primary carcinoid tumour of the kidney is an extremely rare entity and only 40 cases have been reported in the literature. As a consequence, very little is known about its real histogenesis, and its prognosis and clinicopathological patterns are not precisely defined. We report a case of primary carcinoid tumour of the kidney found in a middle-aged woman treated by nephrectomy, along with a thorough review of the literature concerning this kind of neoplasm.

Over the past three decades, non-operative management has been shown to be an effective therapeutic option in hemodynamically stable patients. We retrospectively reviewed the last 7 years of our experience with the non-operative management of blunt abdominal traumas. From January 1998 to July 2005, 123 patients with blunt abdominal traumas and injuries to the spleen, liver and pancreas were admitted to our hospital. Fifty-eight of them (47.2%) were submitted to non-operative management; 5 (8.6%) presented associated splenic and hepatic injuries. We performed non-operative treatment for 27 splenic injuries (33.7% of all splenic injuries), 32 hepatic injuries (62.7% of all hepatic injuries) and 3 pancreatic injuries (75% of all pancreatic injuries). There was no mortality and no complications. We submitted one haemodynamically stable patient who presented a grade V hepatic injury and "contrast pooling" at abdominal CT scan to angiography and transarterial embolisation; this patient was successfully managed non-operatively. The overall success rate of non-operative management was 98.5%. The only non-operative management failure was a patient with both splenic and hepatic injuries. The success rate for injuries to the spleen was 96.3%, to the liver 96.9% and to the pancreas 100%. We conclude that hemodynamically stable patients suffering intra-abdominal injury can be safely managed non-operatively.

The colorectal cancer presents with bowel obstruction in 10%-30% of patients. Established treatment of this evolutive condition, until 15 years ago, was emergency surgery. Primary resection with or without ileostomy, staged resection, Hartmann's procedure, or definitive colostomy are the therapeutical options. There is ongoing controversy on the best procedure to apply, because the choice depends on the patient's condition, age, electrolyte imbalances, nutritional status, obstructional grade, comorbidity and surgeon's attitude. However, the obstruction and the emergency operation add risk of complications and mortality instead of elective surgery. The efficacy of self-expanding metal stent to solve the obstruction had recently changed the management of malignant luminal obstruction: it is safe, effective, with very low mortality, low morbidity and also cheap. In the inoperable cases it represents the first line therapy avoiding the colostomy. In the operable patients, instead of two-step surgery, the SEMS had to be preferred because is a one-time and election surgery and avoid colostomy too, even if temporary. SEMS versus emergency primary surgery, without randomized and controlled study, allows a safer single-staged surgery. Finally it improves the quality of life avoiding colostomy, and reducing operative risk. We present two different use of SEMS: the palliation in inoperable patient and the "bridge to surgery" in critical obstructed patient.

Solid pseudopapillary tumours of the pancreas (SPTP) are a distinct clinico-pathological entity that differs from the other cystic pancreatic neoplasms in the young age of onset, the almost exclusive incidence in the female sex and the low degree of malignancy. SPTP is a rare neoplasm that has shown a progressive increase of incidence, passing from 0.17%-2.7% of all exocrine tumours of the pancreas in the 1980's, to 6% in recent reports in 2003. In addition, it accounts for about 5% of cystic neoplasms of the pancreas. With the present paper, in the world literature, updated to August 2005, 887 cases have been described in 248 articles. The histogenesis of these epithelial neoplasms remains uncertain though it is likely that they originate from pluripotent immature pancreatic cells. The tumour is generally of large size and invariably presents a capsule. The diagnosis in most cases is based on compressive symptoms, pain or finding of a palpable mass, while in about 20% of the patients the finding is occasional during abdominal imaging performed for other pathologies. CT and MR are not always sufficient to differentiate with certainty between this type of tumour and other cystic neoplasms of the pancreas such as pseudocysts, parasitic cysts and congenital cysts. Cytological examination in most cases permits the diagnosis of SPTP. The malignancy of these neoplasms is attenuated and local with capsular invasion, lymp-node spread and, only rarely, liver and peritoneal metastases. The surgical treatment has to be radical since the malignancy can only be defined by postoperative histological examination. The treatment consists of three possible options: duodenocephalopancreatectomy, intermediate pancreatectomy, and distal pancreatectomy with or without splenectomy. Intraoperative histological examination is mandatory for the diagnostic confirmation and for the evaluation of negativity of the pancreatic resection margins. Survival after radical resection is excellent. Moreover, in forma metastasizing to the liver an aggressive attitude may be still curative and assure longer survival. The Authors report their experience with three female patients with an average age 18 years (28,19 and 8 years) operated on between 1995 and 2000 for SPTP. Two of the patients were asymptomatic and the finding of the tumour was occasional. The third patient presented jaundice and abdominal pain. The average diameter of the tumours was 6 cm (4, 7 and 7 cm). In all three cases tumour marker values (CEA, Ca19-9, alphaFP) were normal. Only in one case was the preoperative diagnosis correct. The surgical treatment depended on the location of the neoplasms: for the two tumours in the head, in one case an enucleoresection was performed in relation to an exophytic location, while, in the other, a duodenocephalopancreatectomy was performed. In the somatopancreatic tumour a distal splenopancreatectomy was performed. Only in one case (the DCP) the capsule and the surrounding parenchyma were infiltreted by neoplasm. In all cases there was immunohistochemical positivity for alpha1-antitrypsin and for neuron-specific enolase. Neither mortality nor operative morbidity were observed. Follow-up with CT found no relapses in any of the three patients after 5, 7 and 10 years, respectively, after the operation.