Search

Many complex mechatronic systems consist of multiple interconnected dynamical subsystems, which are designed, developed, analyzed, and manufactured by multiple independent teams. To support such a design approach, a modular model framework is needed to reduce computational complexity and, at the same time, enable multiple teams to develop and analyze the subsystems in parallel. In such a modular framework, the subsystem models are typically interconnected by means of a static interconnection structure. However, many complex dynamical systems exhibit position-dependent behavior (e.g., induced by translating interfaces) which cannot be not captured by such static interconnection models. In this paper, a modular model framework is proposed, which allows to construct an interconnected system model, which captures the position-dependent behavior of systems with translating interfaces, such as linear guide rails, through a position-dependent interconnection structure. Additionally, this framework allows to apply model reduction on subsystem level, enabling a more effective reduction approach, tailored to the specific requirements of each subsystem. Furthermore, we show the effectiveness of this framework on an industrial wire bonder. Here, we show that including a position-dependent model of the interconnection structure 1) enables to accurately model the dynamics of a system over the operating range of the system and, 2) modular model reduction methods can be used to obtain a computationally efficient interconnected system model with guaranteed accuracy specifications.

Complex mechatronic systems are typically composed of interconnected modules, often developed by independent teams. This development process challenges the verification of system specifications before all modules are integrated. To address this challenge, a modular redesign framework is proposed in this paper. Herein, first, allowed changes in the dynamics (represented by frequency response functions (FRFs)) of the redesigned system are defined with respect to the original system model, which already satisfies system specifications. Second, these allowed changes in the overall system dynamics (or system redesign specifications) are automatically translated to dynamics (FRF) specifications on module level that, when satisfied, guarantee overall system dynamics (FRF) specifications. This modularity in specification management supports local analysis and verification of module design changes, enabling design teams to work in parallel without the need to iteratively rebuild the system model to check fulfilment of system FRF specifications. A modular redesign process results that shortens time-to-market and decreases redesign costs. The framework's effectiveness is demonstrated through three examples of increasing complexity, highlighting its potential to enable modular mechatronic system (re)design.

This paper proposes a balancing-based model reduction approach for an interconnection of passive dynamic subsystems. This approach preserves the passivity and stability of both the subsystems and the interconnected system. Hereto, one Linear Matrix Inequality (LMI) per subsystem and a single Lyapunov equation for the entire interconnected system needs to be solved, the latter of which warrants the relevance of the reduction of the subsystems for the accurate reduction of the interconnected system, while preserving the modularity of the reduction approach. In a numerical example from structural dynamics, the presented approach displays superior accuracy with respect to an approach in which the individual subsystems are reduced independently., Comment: 6 pages, 4 figures, to appear in Proceedings of IFAC World Congress 2023

In this work, a modular approach is introduced to select the most important eigenmodes for each component of a composed structural dynamics system to obtain the required accuracy of the reduced-order assembly model. To enable the use of models of complex (structural) dynamical systems in engineering practice, e.g., in a design, optimization and/or control context, the complexity of the models needs to be reduced. When the model consist of an assembly of multiple interconnected structural components, component mode synthesis is often the preferred model reduction method. The standard approach to component mode synthesis for such system is to select the eigenmodes of a component that are most important to accurately model the dynamic behavior of this component in a certain frequency range of interest. However, often, a more relevant goal is to obtain, in this frequency range, an accurate model of the assembly. In the proposed approach, accuracy requirements on the level of the assembly are translated to accuracy requirements on component level, by employing techniques from the field of systems and control. With these component-level requirements, the eigenmodes that are most important to accurately model the dynamic behavior of the assembly can be selected in a modular fashion. We demonstrate with two structural dynamics benchmark systems that this method based on assembly accuracy allows for a computationally efficient selection of eigenmodes that 1) guarantees satisfaction of the assembly accuracy requirements and 2) results in most cases in reduced-order models of significantly lower order with respect to the industrial standard approach in which component eigenmodes are selected using a frequency criterion.

One of the most popular methods for reducing the complexity of assemblies of finite element models in the field of structural dynamics is component mode synthesis. A main challenge of component mode synthesis is balancing model complexity and model accuracy, because it is difficult to predict how component reduction influences assembly model accuracy. This work introduces an approach that allows for the translation of assembly model accuracy requirements in the frequency domain to the automatic selection of the cut-off frequencies for the model-order reduction (MOR) of components. The approach is based on a mathematical approach for MOR for coupled linear systems in the field of systems and control. We show how this approach is also applicable to structural dynamics models. We demonstrate the use of this approach in the scope of component mode synthesis (CMS) methods with the aim to reduce the complexity of component models while guaranteeing accuracy requirements of the assembly model. The proposed approach is illustrated on a mechanical, three-component structural dynamics system for which reduced-order models are computed that are reduced further compared to reduction using standard methods. This results in lower simulation cost, while maintaining the required accuracy.

Models of complex systems often consist of multiple interconnected subsystem/component models that are developed by multi-disciplinary teams of engineers or scientists. To ensure that such interconnected models can be applied for the purpose of simulation and/or control, a reduced-order model for the interconnected dynamics is needed. In the scope of this paper, we pursue this goal by subsystem reduction to warrant modularity of the reduction approach. Clearly, by reducing the complexity of the subsystem models, not only the accuracy of the subsystem models is affected, but, consequently, also the accuracy of the interconnected model. It is typically difficult to predict a priori how the interconnected model accuracy is affected precisely by the subsystem reduction. In this work, we address this challenge by introducing a top-down approach which enables the translation of given accuracy requirements of the interconnected system model to accuracy requirements at subsystem model level, by using mathematical tools from robust performance analysis. This allows for the independent reduction of subsystem models while guaranteeing the desired accuracy of the interconnected model. In addition, we show how this top-down approach can be used to significantly reduce the interconnected model in an illustrative structural dynamics case study.

Many complex engineering systems consist of multiple subsystems that are developed by different teams of engineers. To analyse, simulate and control such complex systems, accurate yet computationally efficient models are required. Modular model reduction, in which the subsystem models are reduced individually, is a practical and an efficient method to obtain accurate reduced-order models of such complex systems. However, when subsystems are reduced individually, without taking their interconnections into account, the effect on stability and accuracy of the resulting reduced-order interconnected system is difficult to predict. In this work, a mathematical relation between the accuracy of reduced-order linear-time invariant subsystem models and (stability and accuracy of) resulting reduced-order interconnected linear time-invariant model is introduced. This result can subsequently be used in two ways. Firstly, it can be used to translate accuracy characteristics of the reduced-order subsystem models directly to accuracy properties of the interconnected reduced-order model. Secondly, it can also be used to translate specifications on the interconnected system model accuracy to accuracy requirements on subsystem models that can be used for fit-for-purpose reduction of the subsystem models. These applications of the proposed analysis framework for modular model reduction are demonstrated on an illustrative structural dynamics example.