Search

Summary: The COVID‐19 pandemic has imposed substantial burdens on clinicians and there is a need to better understand the impact on mental health and well‐being. This scoping review investigates the prevalence of mental health concerns in anaesthetists, risk and protective factors for mental well‐being, and anaesthetists' pandemic‐related concerns and support. We searched online databases for articles published between January 2020 and May 2022, using search terms related to: anaesthesia; burnout, well‐being, mental health or stress; and COVID‐19. We identified 20 articles comprising 19 different populations of anaesthetists (n = 8680) from 14 countries. Studies identified the prevalence of the following condition in anaesthetists: burnout (14–59%); stress (50–71%); anxiety (11–74%); depression (12–67%); post‐traumatic stress (17–25%); psychological distress (52%); and insomnia (17–61%). Significant risk factors for poorer mental health included: direct COVID‐19‐related issues (fear of self and family exposure to infection; requirement for quarantine); practitioner health factors (insomnia; comorbidities); psychosocial factors (loneliness; isolation; perceived lack of support at home and work); demographic factors (female gender; non‐white ethnicity; LGBTQIA+); and workplace factors (redeployment outside area of clinical practice; increased work effort; personal protective equipment shortages). Protective factors identified included: job satisfaction; perceived organisational justice; older age; and male sex. Anaesthetists' self‐reported concerns related to: personal protective equipment; resource allocation; fear of infection; fear of financial loss; increased workload; and effective communication of protocols for patient treatment. Support from family, colleagues and hospital management was identified as an important coping mechanism. Findings from this review may support the design of interventions to enhance anaesthetists' psychological health during pandemic conditions and beyond. Future research should include consistent psychological outcome measures and rigorous experimental design beyond cross‐sectional studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Background: Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty (UPPP) and coblation channeling of the tongue (CCT) are oropharyngeal surgeries used to treat obstructive sleep apnea syndrome. The extent to which UPPP and CCT affect pharyngeal swallow has not been determined. We therefore conducted a novel case series study employing high‐resolution impedance manometry (HRIM) to quantify the swallowing‐related biomechanics following UPPP and/or CCT surgery. Methods: Twelve patients who underwent UPPP+CCT or CCT only were assessed an average 2.5 years postsurgery. Swallow function data were compared with ten healthy controls. All patients completed the Sydney swallow questionnaire (SSQ). Pharyngeal pressure‐flow analysis of HRIM recordings captured key distension, contractility and pressure‐flow timing swallow parameters testing 5, 10, and 20 mL volumes of thin and thick fluid consistencies. Key Results: Postoperative patients had more dysphagia symptoms with five returning abnormal SSQ scores. Swallowing was biomechanically altered compared to controls, consistent with diminished swallowing reserve, largely driven by elevated hypopharyngeal intrabolus pressure due to a reduced capacity to open the upper esophageal sphincter to accommodate larger volumes. Conclusions & Inferences: Patients who have undergone UPPP and/or CCT surgery appear to have a deficiency in normal modulation of the swallowing mechanism and a reduced swallowing functional reserve. We speculate that these changes may become relevant in later life with the onset of age‐related stressors to the swallowing mechanism. This case series strikes a note of caution that further studies are needed to determine the role of preoperative swallow assessment in patients undergoing UPPP and/or CCT surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]