Search

The drafting of the Circumstantiated Term of Occurrence (TCO) by the Military Police (PM) represents the guarantee of fundamental rights, provided for in the Constitution, of access to public security and justice for citizens. The study sought to present the legal provision for the drawing up of the TCO by the Military Police; the history of the implantation and operationalization of the TCO by the Military Police of the State of Goiás; and analyze the numbers of the records, separating by nature of the criminal offenses that were registered via TCO, in the State of Goiás, between the years 2018 and 2021. The main results showed that the debates about the legality of the PM ended with the judgments of the Actions Unconstitutionality Directives (ADIs) No. 3807 and No. 5637; the history of the implementation of the TCO by PMGO marks the Provision 18/15 of the TJGO, the operationalization advanced from 2018; the numbers of TCOs drawn up expose not only statistical data, but social problems that deserve debate by the government and organized civil society. The operationalization of the TCO by PMGO evidences compliance with the principles provided for in Law 9099/95, namely: procedural economy, orality, celerity, informality and simplicity. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Crime against property in rural areas can jeopardize farmer's development conditions given to the losses of assets that are fundamental either for their livelihoods or for agricultural production. This study aims to describe and compare the crimes of robbery and theft in Cristalina; quantify, classify and describe the property losses of assets stolen; and describe the circumstances in which crime occurred and their impact on farmers. The research was based on police records (report of occurrences) of crimes of robbery and theft against rural properties in the municipality of Cristalina in the years 2017 and 2018. The results show that: in robbery, the subtraction of specific goods, such as vehicles, firearms and cell phones occurred in greater numbers, while in thefts, goods such as energy transformers and assets directly linked to agricultural production are in greater quantity. Patrimonial losses are greater in thefts. The conditions and circumstances of the robbery are characterized by aggressiveness and by tshe number of perpetrators (average of 3); in theft, the subtraction of energy transformers is representative. The property loss is relatively high for the farmers, potentially jeopardizing their livelihoods as well as their farming activity, both in robbery and theft crimes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]