Carvalho, Pedro H V, Latack, Brooke C, Ferraz, Marcos V C, Nolasco, Lester J R P, Meireles, Willi R, Oliveira, Heitor O M, and Zinn, Richard A
The objective of the current study was to evaluate the effects of tannin and monensin supplementation in feedlot diets and breed (Holstein vs. Angus × Holstein) on growth performance, energetic efficiency, and carcass characteristics. Eighty purebred Holstein calves (HOL; initial body weight (BW) = 130 ± 5 kg) and 80 Angus × Holstein calves (AXH; initial BW = 129 ± 6 kg) were blocked by initial BW and randomly assigned to 40 pens. Dietary treatments consisted of a steam-flaked corn-based diet supplemented with (1) no feed additive (CON); (2) 30 mg of monensin/kg of dry matter (DM; MON; Rumensin 90, Elanco, Greenfield, IN); (3) 1.5 g tannin)/kg of DM (TAN; ByPro, 70% condensed tannin, SilvaFeed, Indunor, S.A., Buenos Aires, Argentina); (4) M + T, the combination of MON plus TAN dietary treatments. Data were analyzed as a randomized complete block in a 2 × 4 factorial arrangement of treatments, using pens as experimental units. There were no interactions (P> 0.05) between feed additives and breed. Supplemental MON increased (P≤ 0.04) initial 112-d BW and gain efficiency. However, there were no dietary treatment effects (P> 0.10) on overall growth performance. Monensin supplementation decreased (P= 0.04) minimum daily ruminal temperature compared with other dietary treatments during July, but TAN did not affect ruminal temperature. Holstein steers had greater (P= 0.04) overall DM intake compared with AXH, with no difference (P= 0.19) in overall ADG, leading to increased (P< 0.01) gain efficiency for AXH compared with HOL. Dietary net energy for maintenance and gain, based on growth performance, were greater (P≤ 0.01) for AXH vs HOL. Compared with HOL, AXH steers had greater (P≤ 0.01) carcass weight, dressing percentage, kidney, pelvic, and heart fat, 12th rib fat thickness, longissimus area, and preliminary yield grade. Holstein steers had lower (P≤ 0.04) minimum average ruminal temperature during June compared with AXH, with no differences (P≥ 0.14) between breeds during July or August. Results indicate that feed additives did not appreciably affect steer growth performance and carcass characteristics, but crossbred AXH steers had greater growth performance, efficiency of dietary energy utilization, and carcass quality measures compared with HOL. This study observed a reduction (4.7%) in maintenance energy expenditure in AXH compared with HOL, implying in maintenance energy coefficient of 0.086 vs 0.082 for HOL and AXH, respectively.Calf-fed concentrate-based finishing diets for 328 d beef × dairy cross (Angus × Holstein) steers were more efficient than calf-fed Holstein steers in the feedlot. Tannin and monensin supplementation did not affect overall growth performance.Effects of tannin and monensin supplementation on growth performance, energetic efficiency, and carcass characteristics were evaluated in Holstein and Angus × Holstein steers. The investigation used a factorial design to access the impacts of both feed additives and breed on the study’s parameters. Tannin supplementation did not affect growth performance. There were no dietary treatment effects on overall steer growth performance. Calf Holstein steers were fed with grain diet based. Holstein steers had greater overall DM intake than Angus × Holstein steers, but breed did not affect average daily gain. Thus, gain efficiency was greater for Angus × Holstein vs Holstein steers. There was no effect of dietary treatment on carcass measures. Compared with Holsteins, Angus × Holstein steers had greater carcass weight, dressing percentage, internal and external fat, longissimus area, and marbling score than Holstein steers. The current study suggests that monensin and tannin supplementation did not affect overall steer growth performance and carcass characteristics. Compared with Holsteins, crossbred Angus × Holstein steers had increased growth performance and carcass quality measures.