Search

Objective: The objective of this review was to evaluate the effectiveness of diaphragmatic breathing for reducing physiological and psychological stress in adults 18 years and over., Introduction: Stress has reached epidemic proportions globally. Unidentified sequela of physiological and psychological stress can result in anxiety, depression, heart disease, cancer, immunologic conditions and death. There is a high cost associated with the treatment of stress related health conditions in the United States and worldwide. Many treatments are pharmacologic and cannot be self-initiated. Therefore, it is critical to identify evidence-based, low-cost, non-pharmacologic, self-administered interventions that can mitigate physiological and psychological stress., Inclusion Criteria: This review considered adults 18 years and over engaged in diaphragmatic breathing as an isolated intervention to reduce physiological and psychological stress. There were no exclusions based on physical or psychological conditions. The comparator was no treatment or usual treatment, which may constitute ordinary breathing., Methods: The comprehensive literature search included published and unpublished studies in English from the beginning of the databases through January 2018. The databases searched included: PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Embase, PsycINFO, ProQuest Nursing and Allied Health and Health Source: Nursing/Academic Edition. The recommended JBI approach to critical appraisal, study selection, data extraction and data synthesis was used., Results: Three studies met the criteria for review: one randomized controlled trial and two quasi-experimental studies. Statistical pooling was not possible due to clinical and methodological heterogeneity of interventions and outcome measures of the included studies. All three studies demonstrated the effectiveness of diaphragmatic breathing on reducing stress. One study showed improvement in the biomarkers of respiratory rate and salivary cortisol levels, one showed improvement in systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and one study showed an improvement in the stress subscale of the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales-21 (DASS-21) after implementation of a diaphragmatic breathing intervention. Although there were limitations across the studies, such as sample size, and length and duration of the intervention over time, ranging from one 20-minute intervention to nine months, the studies demonstrated that diaphragmatic breathing had a positive effect on lowering physiological and psychological stress., Conclusions: The evidence suggests that diaphragmatic breathing may decrease stress as measured by physiologic biomarkers, as well psychological self-report tools. Given the benefits of diaphragmatic breathing on stress reduction, ongoing research is needed to continue to establish the evidence-base for this self-administered, low-cost, non-pharmacologic intervention.

Review Question: What is the effectiveness of diaphragmatic breathing on physiological and psychological stress in adults?

Deviation from normal bowel function in the pediatric population is often a cause for concern for parents and caregivers, prompting numerous visits to a primary care provider. Constipation is a common and challenging issue in children that can have an adverse impact on their psychosocial and emotional well-being as well as quality of life. This article provides practical strategies for diagnosing, treating, and preventing constipation in children.

Gout is a disorder of purine metabolism that primarily occurs in adult males. Elevated plasma uric acid concentrations (hyperuricemia) cause deposits of urate crystals in joint spaces causing severe, repeated attacks of arthritis.

Falls in older adults are a major public health concern and can often have fatal results. Practitioners need to be aware of assessment and diagnostic techniques to prevent falls in older adults.

Corneal abrasion is a common eye injury that occurs in all age-groups. A focused history and physical exam can identify patients with corneal abrasions and improve intervention time. Minor corneal abrasions usually heal within 48 hours without complications or eye damage.

Abdominal pain is a common complaint encountered in primary care and in the ED. Varying levels of pain dictate the immediacy of the intervention. Time is vital when making the decision to initiate therapeutic interventions. A comprehensive assessment with physical exam and diagnostic studies is required.

Crohn disease (CD) is an autoimmune disease that affects people across the lifespan. Patients with CD are predisposed to other autoimmune illnesses, such as psoriasis or arthritis, and suffer from complications including infection and malnutrition. This article will focus on the diagnosis and treatment of CD.

An integral part of an advanced practice nursing student's education is to partner with a clinical preceptor. Developing strategies to balance busy clinical practice and preceptor responsibilities can foster a positive mentoring experience.

Review Question/objective: The objective of this review is to identify the effectiveness of group visits for patients with heart failure (HF) on knowledge, quality of life, self-care behaviors, and hospital readmissions., Research Questions: BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) continues to be a major health burden throughout the world. There are currently over 5.7 million Americans, 15 million Europeans, and 277,800 Australians living with HF. These numbers are expected to double by 2040. Patients and caregivers perform the majority of HF care in the home. Patients with HF need to learn to be successful in self-managing their condition to lessen the burden of symptoms such as fatigue, dyspnea, and edema.Patient education is the primary process used to increase knowledge of self-care practices for patients with HF. Patients with HF need to follow a complex medical regimen while adhering to a low sodium diet and prescribed fluid restrictions. In addition patients monitor their physical condition daily for exacerbation of symptoms or signs of fluid overload. Education, behavior modification, and skill development are necessary for a patient with HF to be successful in self-managing their condition.Most HF education occurs during one-on-one visits between the patient and the health care provider in an examination room during a regular clinic visit. However, there is usually limited time to address all of the needed education topics in an in-depth, meaningful manner with information the patient can take home and utilize in their daily routines.Group visits provide an alternative venue to provide care for this complex patient population. A group visit is an interactive process between a health care provider and a small group of patients and their caregivers who usually share a common medical concern. The participants of group visits can benefit from the knowledge and experiences of the other participants while providing support and encouragement to each other as they learn to cope with living with a chronic condition.The process of the group visit was first developed in 1991 by Dr. John C. Scott at the Kaiser Permanente system in Colorado, United States. Dr. Scott and a nurse held monthly group visits lasting 60 minutes with a group of 15 to 20 patients to manage their complex medical conditions. The group visit model can vary across settings, including from 6-20 patients over a 1-2 hour period with varying times devoted to education and discussion of health concerns. The group visit typically incorporates a one-on-one physical examination with a physician or nurse practitioner in conjunction with a group discussion and medical management. Group visits have shown to be beneficial in improving patient outcomes for conditions such as diabetes, hypertension, and other chronic illness.The goal of group visits for patients with HF is to increase patient knowledge and self-care abilities, while improving self-efficacy. Self-care incorporates the decision making process a patient undergoes when deciding on a course of action to maintain stability as a result of a change in symptoms. Improved self-care can improve symptoms, which will likely result in an increase in quality of life and a reduction in hospitalizations related to decompensation. Quality of life (QOL) refers to a patient's perception of the impact of a health condition and treatment on the patient's health status and can be measured with valid and reliable tools such as the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) or the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ). Self-care abilities can be measured using an instrument such as the Self-Care Heart Failure Index (SCHFI). HF knowledge can be measured using an instrument such as the Atlanta Heart Failure Knowledge Test. Group visits can be used to continue to optimize medication therapy while providing a forum for knowledge acquisition and fostering support.A search of the Cochrane Library of Systematic Reviews, the Joanna Briggs Library of Systematic Reviews, MEDLINE, and CINAHL did not identify any previously conducted systematic reviews on the effectiveness of group visits on outcomes for patients with heart failure. Therefore, this review seeks to identify studies evaluating the effectiveness of group visits for patients with heart failure on patient knowledge, quality of life, self-care behaviors, and hospital readmissions.

Background: The prevalence of diabetes mellitus is ubiquitous. Complications and costs of diabetes are rising and are depleting limited resources. It is imperative for healthcare professionals and patients alike to confront this chronic condition by exploring new interventions. An innovative health care delivery model has emerged in the last 25 years in the form of the group medical visit. Group medical visits can range from of six to twenty patients scheduled together with time allotted for individual care as well as in the group setting., Objectives: The review objective was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to synthesize the best available evidence related to effectiveness of group medical visits on HbA1c, blood pressure and cholesterol measurements/levels for adult patients with type II diabetes in outpatient settings., Search Strategy: A three-step literature search for studies in English language from 1990 to 2010 was conducted utilising (a) a primary search of Medline, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, (b) a secondary search of non-indexed databases, and (c) a search of the grey literature. In addition, a manual review of the reference lists of all identified reports and articles was performed to identify additional studies., Inclusion Criteria: All randomised and quasi-experimental studies of adult patients (>18) with type II diabetes mellitus seen in outpatient health settings were considered if they met one or more of the following diagnostic outcome measurements: haemoglobin A1c, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, and low density lipoprotein cholesterol., Critical Appraisal, Data Collection and Analysis: Each of the eligible articles was reviewed by two independent reviewers. Disagreements between the reviewers were resolved through discussion, or with a third reviewer. Studies that met the inclusion criteria were assessed for methodological quality using the JBI standardized critical appraisal tools. Data extraction was undertaken using the standardised data extraction tool from JBI-MAStARI., Main Results: The search strategy identified 2,040 articles in the published and unpublished literature. Of these, 11 randomised controlled trials and 4 quasi-experimental trials met the inclusion criteria and represented 2240 patients included in the final review.There are clear benefits of group medical visits for patients' HbA1c levels which are consistent in the post-intervention and change from baseline effect sizes. The most significant effect observed is with the change from baseline results. Some evidence suggests post-intervention and change from baseline systolic blood pressure improvement at the nine to twelve month interval and change from baseline improvement at the 4 year timeframe. There is no evidence that group visits improve LDL cholesterol values of the group visit participants., Conclusions: Group medical visits should be considered by clinicians as an effective non-pharmacologic intervention that can have a positive impact on biologic markers such as haemoglobin A1c and systolic blood pressure., Implications for Practice: The evidence suggests that the most powerful model of Group medical visits (GMV) is when a clinician prescriber is present during or immediately after GMV sessions for medication reconciliation or individual patient needs., Implications for Research: Future research should include this GMV intervention in randomised controlled trials across different health systems and socio-economic and ethnic groups.