Search

Key Points Question: Is the Skin and UV Neoplasia Transplant Risk Assessment Calculator (SUNTRAC) tool valid for guiding skin cancer screening in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs)? Findings: This prognostic study found good prognostic discrimination in a European cohort of 3421 SOTRs. The observed skin cancer incidences were similar to those predicted from the US SOTR population for each risk group. Meaning: These findings suggest that the SUNTRAC tool can be transported to different populations to stratify SOTRs into distinct skin cancer risk groups and identify those at a very high risk, opening the door to efficient and effective preventive measures.This prognostic study assesses the Skin and UV Neoplasia Transplant Risk Assessment Calculator (SUNTRAC) tool to validate it in different populations of solid organ transplant recipients.Importance: The Skin and UV Neoplasia Transplant Risk Assessment Calculator (SUNTRAC) tool has been developed in the US to facilitate the identification of solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) at a higher risk of developing skin cancer. However, it has not yet been validated in populations other than the one used for its creation. Objective: To provide an external validation of the SUNTRAC tool in different SOTR populations. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective external validation prognostic study used data from a prospectively collected cohort of European SOTRs from transplant centers at teaching hospitals in the Netherlands (1995-2016) and Spain (2011-2021). Participants were screened and followed up at dermatology departments. Data were analyzed from September to October 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures: The discrimination ability of the SUNTRAC tool was assessed via a competing risk survival analysis, cumulative incidence plots, and Wolbers concordance index. Calibration of the SUNTRAC tool was assessed through comparison of projected skin cancer incidences. Skin cancer diagnoses included squamous cell carcinoma, basal cell carcinoma, melanoma, and Merkel cell carcinoma. Results: A total of 3421 SOTRs (median age at transplant, 53 [quartile 1: 42; quartile 3: 62] years; 2132 [62.3%] men) were assessed, including 72 Asian patients (2.1%), 137 Black patients (4.0%), 275 Latinx patients (8.0%), 109 Middle Eastern and North African patients (3.2%), and 2828 White patients (82.7%). With a total of 23213 years of follow-up time, 603 patients developed skin cancer. The SUNTRAC tool classified patients into 4 groups with significantly different risks of developing skin cancer during follow-up. Overall, the relative rate for developing skin cancer estimated using subdistribution hazard ratios (SHRs) and using the low-risk group as the reference group, increased according to the proposed risk group (medium-risk group: SHR, 6.8 [95% CI, 3.8-12.1]; P

Background and objectives:Spain is in a situation of indefinite lockdown due to the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. One of the consequences of this lockdown is delays in medical and surgical procedures for common diseases. The aim of this study was to model the impact on survival of tumor growth caused by such delays in patients with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and melanoma. Material and methods: Multicenter, retrospective, observational cohort study. We constructed an exponential growth model for both SCC and melanoma to estimate tumor growth between patient-reported onset and surgical excision at different time points. Results: Data from 200 patients with SCC of the head and neck and 1000 patients with cutaneous melanoma were included. An exponential growth curve was calculated for each tumor type and we estimated tumor size after 1, 2, and 3 months of potential surgical delay. The proportion of patients with T3 SCC (diameter > 4 cm or thickness > 6 mm) increased from 41.5% (83 patients) in the initial study group to an estimated 58.5%, 70.5%, and 72% after 1, 2, and 3 months of delay. Disease-specific survival at 2, 5, and 10 years in patients whose surgery was delayed by 3 months decreased by 6.2%, 8.2%, and 5.2%, respectively. The proportion of patients with ultrathick melanoma (> 6 mm) increased from 6.9% in the initial study group to 21.9%, 30.2%, and 30.2% at 1, 2, and 3 months. Five- and 10-year disease-specific survival both decreased by 14.4% in patients treated after a potential delay of 3 months. Conclusions:In the absence of adequate diagnosis and treatment of SCC and melanoma in the current lockdown situation in Spain, we can expect to see to a considerable increase in large and thick SCCs and melanomas. Efforts must be taken to encourage self-examination and facilitate access to dermatologists in order to prevent further delays. Este estudio ha sido financiado parcialmente por una beca concedida por la Fundación Piel Sana de la Academia Española de Dermatología y Venereología. J.C. se encuentra parcialmente financiado por el proyecto PI18/00587 (Instituto de Salud Carlos III (ISCIII), cofinanciación FEDER. Yes Antecedentes y objetivos: La pandemia del coronavirus SARS-CoV-2 ha provocado un confinamiento indefinido. Una posible consecuencia de esta situación es un retraso en los procedimientos asistenciales de las enfermedades oncológicas. El objetivo de este estudio es estimar el hipotético impacto en la supervivencia que tendría el aumento del tamaño tanto para los carcinomas de células escamosas (CCE) como de los melanomas. Material y método: Estudio observacional retrospectivo de cohorte multicéntrico. Se desarrolló un modelo de crecimiento exponencial para cada tumor basado en el tiempo de evolución que refiere el paciente. Resultados:Se incluyeron un total de 200 pacientes con CCE localizados en la cabeza y el cuello y 1.000 pacientes con melanoma cutáneo. Se calculó una curva de crecimiento exponencial para cada tumor y se estimó el tamaño del tumor tras 1, 2 y 3 meses tras el diagnóstico. En la muestra, los CCE mayores de 4cm o >6mm de grosor (definidos como T3) pasaron de 83 (41,5%) en el grupo de estudio real a una estimación del 58,5, 70,5 y 72% tras 1, 2 y 3 meses de retraso quirúrgico estimado, respectivamente. Se estimó una disminución de la supervivencia específica de enfermedad (SEE) de un 6,2, 8,2 y 5,2% a los 2, 5 y 10 años, respectivamente, tras 3 meses de retraso. Para los melanomas ultragruesos (>6mm de Breslow) pasaron del 6,9% en el grupo de estudio al 21,9, 30,2 y 30,2% tras 1, 2 y 3 meses de demora. La SEE a los 5 y 10 años del grupo de estudio descendió un 14,4% en ambos tiempos. Conclusiones:En ausencia de un adecuado diagnóstico y tratamiento de los pacientes con CCE y melanoma en la actual situación de confinamiento en España, podemos llegar a asistir a un considerable aumento de los casos de CCE y melanomas gruesos y de gran tamaño. Se deben fomentar los esfuerzos para promocionar la autoexploración y facilitar el acceso a los dermatólogos para no aumentar la demora de estos pacientes.

Background Systemic therapeutic management of post-transplant Kaposi sarcoma (KS) is mainly based on 3 axes: reduction of immunosuppression, conversion to mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitors, chemotherapy, or a combination of these. Objective To obtain an overview of clinical strategies about the current treatment of KS. Methods We conducted a multicenter retrospective cohort study including 145 solid organ transplant recipients diagnosed with KS between 1985 and 2011 to collect data regarding first-line treatment and response at 6 months. Results Overall, 95%, 28%, and 16% of patients had reduction of immunosuppression, conversion to mTOR inhibitor, and chemotherapy, respectively. Patients treated with chemotherapy or mTOR inhibitor conversion were more likely to have visceral KS. At 6 months, 83% of patients had response, including 40% complete responses. Limitations The retrospective design of the study. Conclusion Currently available therapeutic options seem to be effective to control KS in most patients. Tapering down the immunosuppressive regimen remains the cornerstone of KS management.