Search

Despite novel cellular and immunomodulatory therapies, allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) remains a treatment option for lymphoid malignancies. Post-transplant cyclophosphamide (PTCY) is increasingly employed for graft vs. host disease (GVHD) prophylaxis. This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of PTCY in reduce intensity (RIC) HSCT for patients with lymphoid neoplasms compared to sirolimus with tacrolimus (SIR/TAC). The primary endpoint was to compare grade III-IV acute GVHD, severe chronic GVHD, and relapse-free survival (GRFS) between the two GVHD prophylaxis strategies. This study, conducted from January 2012 to December 2020, included 171 consecutive patients (82 in the PTCY and 89 in the SIR/TAC group). Results revealed a significantly decreased incidence of moderate and severe forms of chronic GVHD in PTCY cohort (5.8% [95% CI, 1.8 to 13.1]) versus the SIR/TAC cohort (39.6% [95% CI, 29.3 to 49.7] (p < 0.001)). Other outcomes, including GRFS (PTCY [45.9% (95% CI, 35.8-58.7)] and SIR/TAC groups [36.8% (95% CI, 28-48.4)], (p = 0.72)), non-relapse mortality (NRM), relapse and overall survival (OS) were similar in both groups. Interestingly, the failure to achieve GRFS was mainly attributed to GVHD in the SIR/TAC group, while disease relapse was the primary reason in the PTCY cohort., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

Background: Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) is a cause of late morbidity and nonrelapse mortality (NRM) after allogenic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT). Although studies evaluating haploidentical allo-HSCT (haplo-HSCT) using posttransplant cyclophosphamide (PTCy) demonstrate lower cGVHD rates, comprehensive data describing the clinical profile, risk factors, or outcomes of cGVHD within this platform are scarce., Methods: We conducted a retrospective multicenter analysis of 389 consecutive patients who underwent haplo-HSCT PTCy in 7 transplant centers of the Spanish Group Grupo Español de Trasplante Hematopoyético y Terapia Celular (GETH-TC) between 2008 and 2020 describing incidence, clinical profile, risk factors, and cGVHD outcomes., Results: Ninety-five patients of 389 developed cGVHD. Our data revealed that the incidence and severity of cGVHD are lower than those reported for HLA-identical transplantation with conventional prophylaxis and that the strongest predictor for cGVHD was previous acute GVHD ( P  = 0.031). Also, recipient age ≥60 y ( P  = 0.044) was protective against cGVHD. Moreover, patients with moderate cGVHD had longer event-free survival at 3 y than other patients ( P  = 0.016) and a lower relapse rate at 3 y ( P  = 0.036)., Conclusions: Our results support the fact that the incidence and severity of cGVHD are lower than those reported for HLA-identical transplantation with conventional prophylaxis. In this series, patients who develop moderate cGVHD after haplo-HSCT PTCy had a higher overall survival and event-free survival, and lower relapse, suggesting higher graft-versus-leukemia effect. Although this is the largest series focused on characterizing cGVHD in haplo-HSCT PTCy, further prospective studies are needed to confirm the findings., Competing Interests: The authors declare no funding or conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Background: Allogeneic haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) markedly reduces HIV reservoirs, but the mechanisms by which this occurs are only partly understood. In this study, we aimed to describe the dynamics of virological and immunological markers of HIV persistence after allo-HSCT., Methods: In this prospective observational cohort study, we analysed the viral reservoir and serological dynamics in IciStem cohort participants with HIV who had undergone allo-HSCT and were receiving antiretroviral therapy, ten of whom had received cells from donors with the CCR5Δ32 mutation. Participants from Belgium, Canada, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands, Spain, Switzerland, and the UK were included in the cohort both prospectively and retrospectively between June 1, 2014 and April 30, 2019. In the first 6 months after allo-HSCT, participants had monthly assessments, with annual assessments thereafter, with the protocol tailored to accommodate for the individual health status of each participant. HIV reservoirs were measured in blood and tissues and HIV-specific antibodies were measured in plasma. We used the Wilcoxon signed-rank test to compare data collected before and after allo-HSCT in participants for whom longitudinal data were available. When the paired test was not possible, we used the Mann-Whitney U test. We developed a mathematical model to study the factors influencing HIV reservoir reduction in people with HIV after allo-HSCT., Findings: We included 30 people with HIV with haematological malignancies who received a transplant between Sept 1, 2009 and April 30, 2019 and were enrolled within the IciStem cohort and included in this analysis. HIV reservoirs in peripheral blood were reduced immediately after full donor chimerism was achieved, generally accompanied by undetectable HIV-DNA in bone marrow, ileum, lymph nodes, and cerebrospinal fluid, regardless of donor CCR5 genotype. HIV-specific antibody levels and functionality values declined more slowly than direct HIV reservoir values, decaying significantly only months after full donor chimerism. Mathematical modelling suggests that allogeneic immunity mediated by donor cells is the main viral reservoir depletion mechanism after massive reservoir reduction during conditioning chemotherapy before allo-HSCT (half-life of latently infected replication-competent cells decreased from 44 months to 1·5 months)., Interpretation: Our work provides, for the first time, data on the effects of allo-HSCT in the context of HIV infection. Additionally, we raise the question of which marker can serve as the last reporter of the residual viraemia, postulating that the absence of T-cell immune responses might be a more reliable marker than antibody decline after allo-HSCT., Funding: amfAR (American Foundation for AIDS Research; ARCHE Program), National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, and Dutch Aidsfonds., Competing Interests: Declaration of interests AB reports grants from Gilead Sciences and participating on the advisory board of ViiV Healthcare. AW reports funding for this manuscript from the American Foundation for AIDS Research (amfAR) and Aidsfunds; grants from Gilead and NOW; consulting fees from ViiV Healthcare/GSK, MSD, and Gilead Sciences; participating on the board of the Dutch Federation of Medical Microbiology, the board of the European Society for Translational Antiviral Research, chair on the IAS-USA mutations work group, the Committee of ZonMW (Dutch research organization) Research, and the Committee of the Dutch Federation for Long Covid; and received funding from Ark. AS-C reports funding for this manuscript from amfAR; grants from ANRS, the National Institutes of Health (NIH), Institute Pasteur, and MSDAVENIR; honoraria from MSD, ViiV Healthcare, and Gilead Sciences; and is chair of the Scientific and Medical Committee of Sidaction. B-EOJ reports consulting fees from Gilead Sciences, ViiV Healthcare, and Merck Sharp & Dohme; honoraria from Gilead Sciences and ViiV Healthcare; travel expenses for attending meetings from Gilead; and is scientific secretary for the German AIDS Society. BR reports honoraria from Gilead Sciences, Janssen, and ViiV Healthcare; payment for advice from ViiV Healthcare; and travel expenses for attending meetings and travel from ViiV Healthcare and Gilead Sciences. GH reports travel expenses for attending the meeting and travel for the HIV Persistence Workshop 2022. JB reports receiving honoraria from AbbVie, Pfizer, and Gilead Sciences; and travel expenses for attending meetings from AbbVie, Pfizer, and Gilead Sciences. JK reports grants from Novartis and Miltenyi Biotech; royalties from GADETA and Miltenyi Biotech; a patent with GADETA; and holds stock interest in GADETA. JM-P reports funding for this manuscript from amfAR. JSZW reports funding for this manuscript from The German Center for Infection Research, EU H2020 Research and Innovation Programme, HW & J Hector Foundation, the German Research Foundation, The Hamburg Investment and Development Bank, and amfAR; and honoraria from Nobite, GSK, and Gilead Sciences. JTS reports funding for this manuscript from the NIH and National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases. LB report grants from Abbvie and Gilead Sciences; consulting fees from Abbvie and Gilead Sciences; and honoraria from AbbVie and Gilead Sciences. LV reports receiving grants from ViiV Healthcare and Gilead Sciences; and consulting fees from ViiV Healthcare and Gilead Sciences. MJG and GA declare being an employee of Ragon Institute of Mass General, MIT, and Harvard during the study; and an employee of Moderna afterwards. MNi reports receiving consulting fees from Gilead Sciences; and honoraria for lectures from ViiV Healthcare. All other authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved, including those for text and data mining, AI training, and similar technologies.)

The outcomes of patients with acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) presenting relapse after allogeneic stem cell transplant (allo-SCT) are poor, with few data available in this setting., Objective and Methods: To evaluate the outcomes of patients with ALL presenting relapsed after allo-SCT, we performed a retrospective study including 132 from 11 centres in Spain., Results: Therapeutic strategies consisted of palliative treatment (n = 22), chemotherapy (n = 82), tyrosine kinase inhibitors (n = 26), immunotherapy with inotuzumab and/or blinatumumab (n = 19), donor lymphocyte infusions (n = 29 pts), second allo-SCT (n = 37) and CAR T therapy (n = 14). The probability of overall survival (OS) at 1 and 5 years after relapse was 44% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 36%; 52%) and 19% (95% CI: 11%; 27%). In the 37 patients undergoing a second allo-SCT, the 5-year estimated OS probability was 40% [22%; 58%]. Younger age, recent allo-SCT, late relapse, 1st complete remission at 1st allo-SCT and chronic graft-versus-host disease confirmed their positive impact on survival in the multivariable analysis., Conclusion: Despite the poor prognosis of patients with ALL presenting relapse after a first allo-SCT, some can be satisfactorily rescued and a second allo-SCT still remains a valid option for selected patients. Moreover, emerging therapies really might improve ALL patients outcome when relapsing after an allo-SCT., (© 2023 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Graft-versus-host disease is the main cause of morbidity and mortality after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. First-line treatment is based on the use of high doses of corticosteroids. Unfortunately, second-line treatment for both acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease, remains a challenge. Ruxolitinib has been shown as an effective and safe treatment option for these patients. Seventy-nine patients received ruxolitinib and were evaluated in this retrospective and multicenter study. Twenty-three patients received ruxolitinib for refractory acute graft-versus-host disease after a median of 3 (range 1-5) previous lines of therapy. Overall response rate was 69.5% (16/23) which was obtained after a median of 2 weeks of treatment, and 21.7% (5/23) reached complete remission. Fifty-six patients were evaluated for refractory chronic graft-versus-host disease. The median number of previous lines of therapy was 3 (range 1-10). Overall response rate was 57.1% (32/56) with 3.5% (2/56) obtaining complete remission after a median of 4 weeks. Tapering of corticosteroids was possible in both acute (17/23, 73%) and chronic graft-versus-host disease (32/56, 57.1%) groups. Overall survival was 47% (CI: 23-67%) at 6 months for patients with aGVHD (62 vs 28% in responders vs non-responders) and 81% (CI: 63-89%) at 1 year for patients with cGVHD (83 vs 76% in responders vs non-responders). Ruxolitinib in the real life setting is an effective and safe treatment option for GVHD, with an ORR of 69.5% and 57.1% for refractory acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease, respectively, in heavily pretreated patients.

The prognosis for adult acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) is poor. Only 20-30% of patients will be cured with conventional chemotherapy. Haematopoietic progenitor transplantation is thus an attractive option in these patients. Even if allogeneic transplantation allows a better control of the disease, autologous transplantation remains an important alternative for patients lacking a suitable donor or when allogeneic transplants imply excessive risk. Relapse is the main drawback of autologous transplants, but many strategies are being explored to overcome this problem. We focus here on transplant modality, the source of haematopoietic progenitors, and the best timing to apply the procedure. Also reviewed are the current situation and future strategies for improving results in this setting, such as ex vivo purging; immunotherapy and maintenance chemotherapy.